A new poly-2-methoxyethylacrylate-coated cardiopulmonary bypass circuit possesses superior platelet preservation and inflammatory suppression efficacy

BACKGROUND: Poly-2-methoxyethylacrylate (PMEA) is a new coating material, and several studies have revealed that PMEA-coated cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) circuits have good biocompatibility. This study sought to compare this biocompatibility with those of heparin-coated and noncoated circuits. METHODS: Forty-five patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting were randomly assigned to PMEA-coated (group P, n = 15), heparin-coated (group H, n = 15), or noncoated (group N, n = 15) circuit groups. Clinical data and the following markers were analyzed: (1) platelet preservation by number of platelets; (2) complement (C) activation by C3a and C4a levels; (3) inflammatory response by interleukin-6 (IL-6) and interleukin-8 (IL-8) levels. RESULTS: Platelet numbers were significantly preserved in group P compared with groups N and H. Postoperative blood loss did not differ among the groups. During CPB, C3a values were significantly lower in group H (536 +/- 145 ng/mL) than in group P (1,458 +/- 433 ng/mL, p < 0.01) and group N (1,815 +/- 845 ng/mL, p < 0.01). The C4a values did not differ 60 minutes after CPB initiation among the groups. The IL-6 and IL-8 levels were significantly lower in group P and group H than in group N. CONCLUSIONS: The PMEA coating was superior to heparin coating and noncoating in preserving platelets, and was equivalent to heparin coating in terms of the perioperative clinical course and inhibition of inflammatory cytokines, but slightly inferior in reducing complement activation.     

Heparin-coated Cardiopulmonary Bypass Circuits in Coronary Bypass Surgery

Abstract: Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is a nonphysiologic environment for an organism. The damage of blood components may also lead to organ dysfunction, sometimes recognized as postperfusion syndrome. One possible way to diminish the risk of these complications would be to reduce the thorombogenicity and to improve the biocompatibility of the artificial surfaces by using a heparin-coated CPB circuit. In this study, we compared a heparin-coated CPB circuit with a noncoated CPB circuit in terms of biocompatibility in 20 patients undergoing elective coronary bypass surgery. We employed a Dura-flo II (n = 10) as a heparin-coated CPB circuit and a Univox IC (n = 10) as control subjects. Ten patients (Group C) were operated on using the heparin-coated CPB circuit. A total of 10 patients were given heparin in a reduced dose (2.0 mg/kg), and additional heparin was given if the activated clotting time (ACT) was below 400 s. The control group also included 10 patients (Group NC), who were operated on with noncoated devices. They received 2.5 mg/kg of heparin, and additional heparin was given if the ACT was below 450 s. All patients had normal coagulation parameters and did not receive blood transfusion. We measured complement activation levels (C3a, C4a), platelet count, thrombin-antithrombin III complex levels, D-dimer levels, and ACT during CPB and respiratory index postoperatively. The concentration of C3a in group NC was significantly higher than that in group C. Platelet reduction in group NC was significantly greater than that in group C. There were no significant differences in the remaining parameters between the 2 groups. We concluded that heparin-coated CPB circuits improved biocompatibility by reducing complement activation and platelet consumption and enabled us to reduce the dose of heparin required for systemic heparinization.     

Effects of Heparin Coating of Cardiopulmonary Bypass Circuits on In Vitro Oxygen Free Radical Production During Coronary Bypass Surgery

Abstract During cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) oxygen free radicals (OFR) are formed, which can mediate reactions damaging tissue components. Blood contact with artificial surfaces during CPB leads to an activation of leukocytes, which are one of the sources of the OFR. Heparin coating of the CPB circuit reduces granulocyte activation. In the present study, the heparin-coated circuits with noncoated cardiotomy reservoirs (Group HC) were compared with noncoated, otherwise similar CPB sets (Group C). In each group, 8 patients were operated on for coronary revascularization. The release of granulocyte granule proteins myeloperoxidase (MPO) and lac-toferrin (LF) was evaluated. Production of OFR in the whole blood and in the granulocyte suspension were measured by chemiluminescence (CL). In both groups the whole blood CL declined during CPB. The whole blood CL induced by serum-opsonized zymosan, when enhanced by luminol, was significantly lower in Group HC at 45 min after CPB start (68 ± 6% of initial values in Group HC vs. 87 ± 6% in Group C, mean ± SEM) and 30 min after protaminization (54 ± 6% of initial values in Group HC vs. 72 ± 6% in Group C, mean ± SEM), and CL was significantly higher in Group HC at CPB end (83 ± 5% of initial values in Group HC vs. 67 ± 5% in Group C, mean ± SEM) when enhanced by lucigenin. CL of isolated granulocytes showed no significant differences between the groups. Release of MPO at CPB end and of LF 45 min after start of CPB and at CPB end were significantly lower in the heparin-coated CPB circuits.     

Efficacy of a new coating material, PMEA, for cardiopulmonary bypass circuits in a porcine model

BACKGROUND: A new coating material, poly-2-methoxyethyl acrylate (PMEA), was developed to improve the biocompatibility of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) circuits. METHODS: To investigate the efficacy of the PMEA coating for CPB circuits, we compared PMEA-coated circuits (group P, n = 6) with uncoated circuits (group C, n = 6) and heparin (covalent-bonded heparin, Hepaface)-coated circuits (group H, n = 6) in a porcine CPB model. RESULTS: Platelet counts were significantly preserved in groups P and H compared with those in group C (P versus C, p < 0.05). The plasma levels of thrombin-antithrombin complex and bradykinin were significantly lower at 120 minutes in groups P and H than in group C (thrombin-antithrombin: P versus C, p < 0.05; bradykinin: P versus C, p < 0.05). The amount of fibrinogen adsorbed onto the hollow fibers was markedly less in group P than in groups C and H. CONCLUSIONS: The PMEA coating was equal to heparin coating in preventing reactions induced by CPB circuits, and might be superior to heparin coating in suppressing the adsorption of plasma proteins such as fibrinogen. Thus, PMEA coating may be a suitable means for improving the biocompatibility of CPB circuits.     

Adsorption of inflammatory cytokines using a heparin-coated extracorporeal circuit

Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) surgeries cause an increase in plasma inflammatory cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) along with whole-body inflammatory responses. The inflammatory responses during a CPB treatment are reduced when using a heparin-coated extracorporeal circuit. Because many cytokines, growth factors, and complements are known to interact with heparin, the reduction of inflammatory responses by a heparin-coated circuit is likely to depend on this heparin-binding nature of the inflammatory cytokines. In this study, the inflammatory cytokines, TNF-alpha and IL-6, in fetal bovine serum (FBS) bound to a heparin-agarose beads (heparin beads)-column and the adsorptions were competitively inhibited on addition of heparin in a concentration-dependent manner. TNF-alpha in FBS required a higher concentration of heparin (50% concentration inhibition [IC50] > 20microg/ml) to inhibit adsorption to the heparin beads-column compared with IL-6, probably because of a stronger interaction between TNF-alpha and heparin-beads. TNF-alpha and IL-6 concentrations in human heparinized blood significantly increased after a CPB treatment. Although the adsorbed amount of IL-6 onto the heparin-coated circuit was low (less than 6% of free circulating IL-6), a significant amount of TNF-alpha adsorbed onto the circuit (23.9-755% of free circulating TNF-alpha). Therefore, the adsorption of inflammatory cytokines, especially TNF-alpha, onto the inner heparin-coated surface of an extracorporeal circuit may partly account for a reduction in inflammatory responses.     

Heparin-coated cardiopulmonary bypass circuits reduce blood cell trauma. Experiments in the pig

Blood cell trauma and postoperative bleeding remain important problems in cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). We compared heparin-coated with non-coated circuits in the pig. Twenty animals were perfused for 2 h at normothermia using membrane oxygenators (Bentley Bos 50). Two groups were studied. In the non-coated group (NC, n = 11) the CPB circuits used were without a heparin coating. This group had systemic heparinization of 400 IU/kg to maintain an ACT (activated clotting time) of over 400 s during CPB. In the coated group (C, n = 9), all surfaces exposed to blood in the CPB circuits were heparin-coated. This group had the heparin dose reduced to 25% (100 IU/kg) without further administration regardless of ACT. During CPB, group C displayed shorter ACT (per definition), higher platelet count, platelet adhesion and lower fibrinolysis and haemolysis (P less than 0.05) as compared to group NC. No thromboembolic events were detected during CPB. Three animals in group NC and 4 animals in group C were weaned from CPB and protaminized. Four hours postoperatively, the leucocyte consumption was two-fold greater and blood loss about four-fold greater in group NC as compared with group C (P less than 0.05). Perfusion with heparin-coated surfaces reduces blood cell trauma. The decreased postoperative blood loss observed in group C is probably explained by the reduced dosages of heparin and protamine.     

Biocompatibility of Heparin-Coated Circuits in Pediatric Cardiopulmonary Bypass

Abstract: In this study, we evaluated the biocompatibility of heparin-coated circuits in pediatric cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Eight patients were divided into 2 groups: the control group (Group C) and heparin-coated group (Group H). In Group H, CPB circuits, including the arterial pump, oxygenator, and cannulas were heparin-coated. Before, during, and after CPB, blood samples were obtained to assess the platelet counts (Plat), α2-plasmin plas-minogen inhibitor complex (PIC), thrombin-antithrombin III complex (TAT), C3 activation products (C3a), inter-leukin (IL)-6, IL-8, and polymorphonuclear neutrophil leukocyte (PMN) elastase. There was no significant difference in Plat, PIC, or TAT between groups. Group H showed significantly low levels of C3a (during and after CPB), PMN elastase (during CPB), and IL-6 (after CPB). These data demonstrated that in pediatric CPB, heparin-coated CPB circuits reduced the activation of complements and the production of PMN elastase and IL-6, suggesting the superior biocompatibility of the heparin-coated circuits.     

Reducing hemostatic activation during cardiopulmonary bypass: a combined approach

Interventions such as heparin-coated circuits, epsilon-aminocaproic acid, and reduced shed blood reinfusion have shown mixed results when applied individually for limiting hemostatic activation during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). We compared coagulation and fibrinolytic activation during conventional CPB (control) (CTRL) using noncoated circuits, no antifibrinolytics, and open cardiotomy with a combined strategy (HAC) that used heparin-coated circuits, epsilon-aminocaproic acid, and closed cardiotomy. Blood samples were drawn before, during, and after CPB for primary coronary bypass grafting surgery from 9 CTRL patients and 10 HAC patients. Thrombin-antithrombin complex and fibrinopeptide A levels (markers of thrombin and fibrin generation) were reduced in the HAC versus CTRL group after 30 min of CPB (P < 0.05). Average tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) levels were significantly lower in the HAC group by 30 min on CPB (P < 0.05), resulting in preservation of plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI)-1 during CPB (P < 0.05). D-Dimer, a measure of intravascular fibrin formation and removal, was reduced in the HAC group during and after CPB (P < 0.005). Overall, the combined strategy was associated with a reduction in CPB-induced increases in markers of thrombin generation, fibrin formation, tPA release, and fibrin degradation and better preservation of PAI-1. IMPLICATIONS: A combined approach during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) that uses heparin-coated circuits, epsilon-aminocaproic acid, and limited reinfusion of shed pericardial blood is associated with reduced activation of the coagulation and fibrinolytic systems that typically occurs during conventional CPB.     

In vivo comparison study of FDA-approved surface-modifying additives and poly-2-methoxyethylacrylate circuit surfaces coatings during cardiopulmonary bypass

The purpose of this double-blind prospective and randomized study was to examine the effects of surface-modifying additives (SMAs) and poly-2-methoxyethylacrylate (PMEA) circuits on platelet count, platelet function (Sonoclot), postoperative chest tube drainage volume, peri- and postoperative blood product use, extubation time, and intensive care time. Terumo noncoated, Terumo-coated (PMEA), Cobe noncoated, and Cobe coated (SMA) circuits were evaluated to find the most cost-effective way to improve patient outcomes. We aimed to find if an additional charge for a coated CPB circuit would be recovered by reducing other patient costs (blood transfusions, intensive care unit time, and bring back postoperative bleeding). An initial literature review revealed the comparison of PMEA circuits vs. noncoated circuits and SMA circuits vs. noncoated circuits in both adult and porcine models. Both SMA- and PMEA-coated circuits decreased platelet consumption, platelet factor release, and the overall perioperative inflammatory response while on cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). The question not answered in an initial search was simply, "which coated circuit is best for the patient: SMA or PMEA?" Research comparing the above coated circuits each other was not found. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board. Thirty patients were scheduled for elective coronary artery bypass grafting and/ or valvular repair or replacement surgery. These 30 patients were randomized as 10 patients to Terumo X-Coating (PMEA surface coating) (CT), 10 patients to Cobe Smart-X coating (SMA surface coating; CC), 5 patients to Terumo noncoated tubing (NCT), and 5 patients to Cobe noncoated tubing (NCC). Informed consent was obtained from each patient before surgery. The data showed no statistically significant relationship between platelet counts, platelet function (Sonoclot), postoperative chest tube drainage volume, peri- and postoperative blood products, intensive care unit time, or total hospital length of stay. Analysis revealed statistically significant clinical associations of extubation time and protamine dose with treatment group. This study provided evidence that SMA- and PMEA-coated circuits do not improve platelet consumption or decrease blood product use for patients undergoing CPB. There was statistical significance with a reduction in extubation time and total protamine requirement needed to return activated clotting time (ACT) to baseline post-CPB. Although the use of SMA and/or PMEA circuits during CPB has clinical benefit to the CPB patient, an additional charge for the specialty circuit may not be realized.     

Heparin-Coated Cardiopulmonary Bypass Circuit: Clinical Effects in Pediatric Cardiac Surgery

OBJECTIVES: Heparin-coated cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) circuits have been reported to reduce complement activation and the inflammatory response associated with CPB. We retrospectively compared patients utilizing heparin-coated perfusion circuits with those using noncoated circuits to determine the clinical effects of the different circuits in pediatric cardiac surgery. METHODS: Between July 1995 and July 1997, 203 patients weighing < 10 kg underwent cardiac surgery, 153 patients using heparin-coated bypass circuits and 50 patients using noncoated circuits. The 50 patients operated on with the noncoated circuit (Group N) were matched to 100 patients operated on with coated circuits (Group H) in age, weight, and type of procedure. Urine output during bypass, blood products used after bypass, postoperative ventilation days, hospital stay, morbidity, and mortality were compared between these groups. RESULTS: Body weight, perfusion time, and procedure time were not different between the two groups. Urine output during bypass was notably greater in Group H than in Group N (11.3 +/- 10.5 mL/kg per hour vs 4.8 +/- 3.1 mL/kg per hour, respectively, p < 0.0001). Postoperative mechanical ventilation markedly decreased in Group H (Group H vs N = 2.8 +/- 2.7 days vs 5.1 +/- 7.5 days, respectively, p < 0.05). Red blood cell usage, hospital stay, morbidity, and mortality were not statistically different, although there was a tendency toward decreased transfusion of red cell and platelets in Group H (Group H vs N = 61.2 +/- 121.1 mL/kg vs 102.0 +/- 176.7 mL/kg, respectively, in red cell, p = 0.15; and Group H vs N = 7.9 +/- 13.7 mL/kg vs 13.2 +/- 24.5 mL/kg, respectively, in platelets, p = 0.16). CONCLUSIONS: Patients operated on with the use of heparin-coated circuits had increased urine output during bypass and required less time postoperatively on the ventilator. These results suggest a reduction in the acute inflammatory response, capillary leakage, and overall systemic edema. We now routinely use coated circuits on all pediatric pump cases.     

Improvement of bypass circuit biocompatibility: comparison and combination of heparin-coated circuit and nitric oxide gas infusion

OBJECTIVES: Nitric oxide (NO) gas infusion to the oxygenator, as well as heparin-coated bypass circuits, have been reported to attenuate blood activation induced by the interaction with the artificial surfaces of an extracorporeal bypass circuit. Using a mock circulation model, we compared the effect of each and also evaluated the effect of their combination on attenuating bypass-induced blood activation. METHODS: A miniature closed bypass circuit was primed with diluted fresh human blood and perfused for 180 minutes using a centrifugal pump. NO gas (0, 50, or 100 ppm) was infused to the oxygenator sweep gas of either a non-heparin-coated or a heparin-coated circuit. Platelet counts, beta-thromboglobulin, platelet factor 4, complement-3 activation products and granulocyte elastase were measured at 0, 30, 60, 120, and 180 minutes after starting the perfusion. RESULTS: One hundred ppm of NO was statistically equivalent to the heparin-coated circuit for attenuating bypass-induced blood activation, and a combination of the two significantly surpassed the results of either modification alone. Fifty ppm of NO alone provided only a slight attenuation of blood activation as compared with the non-heparin-coated circuit, though the difference was not significant. A combination of 50 ppm NO and the heparin-coated circuit did not significantly enhance the effects of the heparin-coated circuit alone. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of NO gas infusion and heparin-coated circuits appears to be a useful and promising modification for enhancing the attenuation of bypass-induced blood activation, though the optimal dose of NO infusion in terms of effectiveness and adverse effects to the whole body remains to be established.     

Quantitative evaluation of heparin-coated versus non-heparin-coated bypass circuits during cardiopulmonary bypass

The extracorporealization of blood activates various elements of the fibrinolytic, coagulation, and complement systems. It is theorized that advancements in biocompatibility ameliorate many of the changes leading to improved patient management. The purpose of this study was to determine if heparin-coated circuit (HCC) utilization during cardiopulmonary bypass enhances patient outcomes in a cost-effective manner. A search of the English medical literature was completed to identify all clinical, prospective, randomized trials comparing HCC and non-HCC in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting or valvular surgery. Twenty-six papers consisting of a sample size of 1515 patients were identified and included in the study parameters. The study distinguished between Duraflo II and Carmeda coating techniques and matched papers with different heparin loading doses, as well as use of a heparin-coated cardiotomy. Study parameters were matched for all papers and analyzed according to the availability of data. Statistically significant benefits of HCC were found in postoperative blood loss, time in the ICU, end bypass C3a, time to extubation, end bypass lactoferrin, and end platelet count, but not with respect to postoperative chest tube drainage, red blood cell transfusions, and end bypass TAT complex, D-dimers, and BTG. Data comparing the use of coated or uncoated cardiotomy utilization failed to demonstrate a benefit to heparin coating. Several immunological variables were ameliorated when Carmeda HCC was utilized, although data were insufficient to establish a cost-benefit analysis. In conclusion, heparin-coated circuitry provided statistically better results when compared to noncoated circuitry.     

Changes in Platelet, Granulocyte, and Complement Activation During Cardiopulmonary Bypass Using Heparin-coated Equipment

Abstract: The effects of heparin-coated cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) systems on platelet, granulocyte, and complement activation were investigated during cardiopulmonary bypass. Thirty patients underwent coronary artery bypass surgery with a heparin-coated (Carmeda Bio-Active Surface, CBAS, Medtronic, U.S.A.) CPB system (HC group, n = 10), a heparin-coated oxygenator and uncoated CPB circuit (HO group, n = 10), or an uncoated system (UC group, n = 10). In the HO group, plasma C3a (1667 ± 632 ng/ml) and C4a (1088 ± 319 ng/ml) concentrations were significantly (p < 0.05) lower than in the UC group (2846 ± 1045 ng/ml and 1494 ± 480 ng/ml, respectively) 10 min after the administration of protamine, but there were no significant differences in the platelet or granulocyte counts. In the HC group, granulocyte elastase concentrations 120 min after the onset of CPB (365 ± 177 μg/L) and 10 min after the administration of protamine (676 ± 314 μg/L) were significantly (p < 0.05) lower than in the other 2 groups (820 ± 341 and 893 ± 303 μg/L and 1365 ± 595 and 1,258 ± 622 μg/L). In addition, the increase in the plasma C3a concentration in the HC group 60 (p < 0.05) and 120 min after the onset of CPB (p < 0.05) was significantly less than in the other 2 groups. The C3a and C4a concentrations 10 min after the administration of protamine were significantly (p < 0.005 and p < 0.05) less in the HC group than in the UC group. Platelet counts 10 min after the administration of protamine were significantly higher (p < 0.05) and plasma β-throm-boglobulin concentrations during CPB were significantly lower in the HC group than in the other 2 groups 5 (p < 0.05), 60, and 120 min (p < 0.005) after the onset of CPB. Postoperative blood loss during the first 12 h in the HC group was significantly (p < 0.05) less than that in the UC group. The heparin-coated oxygenator and uncoated CPB circuit reduced complement activation but demonstrated no significant effects on the platelet and granulocyte systems. However, the heparin-coated CPB circuit (with all components making blood contact) reduced platelet, granulocyte, and complement activation and significantly reduced postoperative blood loss. Therefore, heparin coating of CPB systems improves biocompatibility.     

Biocompatibility of poly2methoxyethylacrylate coating for cardiopulmonary bypass.

The systemic inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) may contribute to the development of postoperative complications. Heparin-coated circuits and poly2methoxyethylacrylate (PMEA)-coated circuits have been developed to reduce the risk of such complications. We compared the biocompatibility of these circuits. Twelve patients scheduled to undergo elective coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with CPB were assigned to CPB with a PMEA-coated circuit (PMEA-coated group, n=6) or a heparin-coated circuit (heparin-coated group, n=6). The plasma concentrations of the following inflammatory markers were measured before CPB and just after, 4 hours after, and 24 hours after the termination of CPB: cytokines (interleukin [IL]-6, IL-8, IL-10), complement factor (C3a), polymorphonuclear elastase (PMNE), and coagulofibrinolytic factors (thrombin-antithrombin III complex [TAT], D-dimer). Postoperative clinical response was evaluated on the basis of respiratory index, blood loss, and the postoperative and preoperative body-weight percent ratio. There were no significant differences between the groups in the plasma concentrations of IL-6, IL-10, C3a, PMNE, TAT, or D-dimer. Plasma IL-8 concentrations were below the assay detection limits at all time points in both groups. Clinical variables did not differ significantly between the groups. In conclusion, PMEA-coated CPB circuits are as biocompatible as heparin-coated CPB circuits and prevent postoperative organ dysfunction in patients undergoing elective CABG with CPB.     

Phosphorylcholine-Coated Circuits Improve Preservation of Platelet Count and Reduce Expression of Proinflammatory Cytokines in CABG: A Prospective Randomized Trial

Abstract   Background: The interaction of blood with foreign artificial surfaces during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) has been recognized as a major stimulus in evoking a systemic inflammatory and metabolic response. Phosphorylcholine (PC) is a new-generation coating material designed to ameliorate biocompatibility and thereby to reduce the detrimental interactions of CPB. We studied the effects of PC-coated perfusion circuits on platelet function and the humoral and cellular response to CPB. Methods: Thirty patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting were randomized to PC-coated (PC group, n = 15) and noncoated (control group, n = 15) circuit groups. Clinical data, total blood loss, and pre- and postoperative platelet counts were recorded and IL-6 and TNF-α, CD41a, CD42b, and CD62p were measured at induction of anesthesia, after the initiation of CPB and at termination of CPB. Results: There was a significantly improved preservation of platelet count following CPB in the PC group (p = 0.028), which was sustained over a period of 72 hours. The use of PC-coated circuits further resulted in a significant attenuation of TNF-α and IL-6 expression (p < 0.05 and p < 0.01); however, we were unable to detect any differences in clinical outcomes. Conclusions: Despite similar clinical outcome, the obvious reduction of cytokine expression and improved preservation of platelet count suggest superior biocompatibility of PC-coated circuits.     

The effects of heparin coated circuits on pulmonary injury. A clinical study

AIM: Heparin-coated circuits have dramatic effects on the coagulation cascade, but their role on complement activation has not been clearly defined. In this clinical study the effect of heparin-coated circuits on static lung compliance and pulmonary vascular resistance is described. METHODS: Thirty patients were randomly divided into two groups: with either a heparin-coated circuit or an identical but non-coated circuit control group. In the heparin-coated group, all the blood contacting surfaces were treated with immobilized heparin (Duraflo II.) RESULTS: Early postoperative pulmonary function is determined with measurements of static lung compliance, pulmonary vascular resistance and arterial blood gases. Static lung compliance was significantly better in the heparin coated (HC) group in the early postoperative period (p=0.001). Pulmonary vascular resistance was significantly lower in the heparin-coated (HC) group in the early postoperative period (p=0.001). CONCLUSION: We believe that the method of heparin binding may play a role in its diminished effect on complement activation, but the general augmentation of the circuit's biocompatibility may explain its beneficial effect on pulmonary vascular resistance and static lung compliance.     

The impact of heparin-coated cardiopulmonary bypass circuits on pulmonary function and the release of inflammatory mediators

Reduction of the inflammatory reaction with the use of heparin coating has been found during and after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). The question remains whether this reduced reaction also decreases the magnitude of CPB-induced pulmonary dysfunction. We therefore evaluated the effects of a heparin-coated circuit versus a similar uncoated circuit on pulmonary indices as well as on inflammatory markers of complement activation (C3b/c), elastase-alpha(1)-antitrypsin complex, and secretory phospholipase A(2) (sPLA(2)) during and after CPB. Fifty-one patients were randomly assigned into two groups undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting with either a heparin-coated (Group 1) or an uncoated (Group 2) circuit. During CPB, a continuous positive airway pressure of 5 cm H(2)O and a fraction of inspired oxygen (FIO(2)) of 0.21 were maintained. Differences in favor of the coated circuit were found in pulmonary shunt fraction (P < 0.05), pulmonary vascular resistance index (P < 0.05), and PaO(2)/FIO(2) ratio (P < 0.05) after CPB and in the intensive care unit. During and after CPB, the coated group demonstrated lower levels of sPLA(2). After CPB, C3b/c and the elastase-alpha(1)-antitrypsin complex were significantly less in the coated group (P < 0.001). The coated circuit was associated with a reduced inflammatory response, decreased pulmonary vascular resistance index and pulmonary shunt fraction, and increased PaO(2)/FIO(2) ratio, suggesting that the coated circuit may have beneficial effects on pulmonary function. The correlation with sPLA(2), leukocyte activation, and postoperative leukocyte count suggests reduced activation of pulmonary capillary endothelial cells. IMPLICATIONS: Heparin coating of the extracorporeal circuit reduces the inflammatory response during cardiopulmonary bypass. Analysis of indices of pulmonary function indicates that use of heparin coating may result in less impaired gas exchange.     

Safety of heparin-coated circuits in primates during deep hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the biologic impact of heparin-coated circuits without systemic heparinization during deep hypothermia. Baboons (n=6) were placed on a heparin-coated pediatric closed-circuit cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) system and cooled to 18 degrees C. A control group (n=7) underwent similar protocol with a non heparin-coated circuit and received systemic heparin. Either low flow at 0.5 L/min/m 2 (n=8; 4 in each group) or circulatory arrest (n=5; 2 in experimental group and 3 in control group) was used during deep hypothermia. Samples for complete blood count (CBC), hepatic and renal function tests, activated clotting time (ACT) and thrombelastogram (TEG) were obtained before, during, and after bypass. Cerebral blood flow was measured using Xenon-133 and autopsies were performed to assess end-organ damage. The ACT returned to baseline in both groups, and renal and hepatic function were within normal limits. There was no significant difference between the TEG values between the groups post bypass. Fibrin split products were absent and fibrinogen levels were normal in both groups following bypass. Cerebral blood flows were equivalent in both groups before and after bypass, although in the heparin-coated group cerebral blood flows were significantly higher during CPB. There were no brain histologic changes in the heparin-coated group and one focal cortical infarct in the control group. This study suggests that hypothermia induced a state of anticoagulation that did not result in thrombus formation or end organ dysfunction during CPB with a heparin-coated circuit.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Heparin-coated circuits reduce the formation of TNFα during cardiopulmonary bypass

Background: Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) causes a systemic intlammatory response. TNFα, which is a major inflammatory mediator, has been found in the circulation during and after CPB. Although previous studies have shown that heparin coating of the extracorporeal circuits reduces complement and granulocyte activation, and the inflammatory response, the possible effect of heparin coating on TNFα formation and the inflammatory response has not been fully investigated.
Methods: Eighteen patients scheduled for coronary artery bypass grafting were divided randomly into two groups. One group of patients had extracorporeal perfusion using heparin coated circuits (HC group, n = 9). The other group had extra-corporeal perfusion using an identical circuit that was not coated (UC group, n = 9). Blood samples were drawn before, during, and after CPB for measurement of plasma TNFα, plasma IL-8, neutrophil count, and neutrophil elastase.
Results: Plasma levels of TNFα increased during CPB in the UC group but not in the HC group. Plasma concentrations of IL-8 increased similarly during and after CPB in both groups. Coating the circuits with heparin did not affect the levels of IL-8. In both groups, the neutrophil count increased after the release of the aortic cross clamp and remained elevated for three days. In the HC group, however, the increase of neutrophil count was significantly lower compared with the UC group. Plasma concentrations of neutrophil elastase were significantly increased during and after CPB in both groups. However, the levels of elastase were significantly lower at certain time points in the HC group.
Conclusion: From these observations, we conclude that heparin coating of the extracorporeal circuits reduces the TNFα formation during CPB, which may reduce neutrophil activation.