Long-term mortality outcome of victims of major trauma

Introduction

Although trauma is associated with major acute morbidity and mortality, its long-term outcome is less well defined. We sought to define the rate of readmission to hospital and long-term mortality of victims of major trauma.

Patients and Methods

All Calgary Health Region residents presenting to the regional trauma program with an injury severity score (ISS) ≥12 between April 1, 2002 and March 31, 2006 were included. Readmission to hospital within one-year and deaths occurring on or before September 30, 2008 were identified using regional and provincial databases.

Results

A total of 2652 incident major trauma episodes occurred among 2630 residents; the median age was 41.3 [interquartile range (IQR); 23.1-59.2] years, 1,915 (72%) were male, the median ISS was 19 (IQR; 16-25), and 717 (27%) required intensive care unit admission. Among 2350 survivors to hospital discharge, 537 readmissions occurred (median length of stay 4.0; IQR; 1.6-7.5 days) among 386 patients within one-year of the incident trauma episode, and 323 (60%) required surgery. Re-admitted patients were older, had higher ISS, had longer initial admission length of stay, and were less likely to have sports related injuries. Two hundred and fifteen (8%) of 2350 survivors to hospital discharge died during the median study follow-up duration of 1543 (IQR; 1181-1934) days. Case-fatality rates for 28 days, 90 days, and 365 days were 304 (11%), 327 (12%), and 370 (14%), respectively. Among survivors to 28 days (n = 2348), 66 (3%) suffered delayed one-year mortality (i.e. death occurred between 28 days and 365 days post-trauma). Age ≥65 years of age, initial hospitalisation for ≥28 days, and unintentional falls were independently associated with delayed one-year mortality.

Conclusions

Patients with major trauma are at risk for both acute and delayed adverse outcomes.     

Applicability of the trimodal distribution of trauma deaths in a Level I trauma centre in the Netherlands with a population of mainly blunt trauma

BACKGROUND: Death due to trauma is assumed to follow a trimodal distribution. Since 1995 measures have been taken to regulate organisations involved in trauma care systems in the Netherlands. In estimating the effect of this system we have evaluated the time of death distribution in the University Medical Centre Utrecht (UMCU). STUDY DESIGN: Prospectively collected databases of all trauma victims between January 1996 and December 2005 were retrospectively reviewed. All traumatic deaths were included. Cause of death was divided into exsanguination, thorax, CNS, organ failure, pneumonia, other and unknown. RESULTS: Nine thousand eight hundred and five patients were admitted after trauma; of these patients 659 (6.7%) died. Blunt trauma occurred in 615/659 (93.3%) patients. The temporal distribution did not show a trimodal distribution. One predominant peak was observed, /=14 days, 28% and 29%, respectively. CONCLUSION: No trimodal distribution was confirmed. Only one predominant peak, with a rapid decline, was observed within the first hour after trauma. Even analysed for different causes of death, the trimodal distribution could not be demonstrated. In particular death due to CNS injury showed a complete absence of any peaks.     

Morbidity and mortality after distal pancreatectomy for trauma: A critical appraisal of 107 consecutive patients undergoing resection at a Level 1 Trauma Centre

Background

This study evaluated 30-day morbidity and mortality and assessed pancreas-specific complications in patients with major pancreatic injuries who underwent a distal pancreatectomy.

Study design

Records of 107 consecutive patients who underwent a distal pancreatectomy at a Level 1 Trauma Centre in Cape Town between January 1982 and December 2011 were reviewed. Primary endpoints were postoperative morbidity and death. Complications were graded according to the Clavien–Dindo severity classification and the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definitions.

Results

A total of 107 patients [94 men, median age 26, median RTS 7.8, 69 penetrating injuries (63 gunshot wounds, 6 stabs wounds), 38 blunt injuries] underwent distal pancreatectomy. Overall mortality was 12%, 16% for gunshot injuries, 8% for blunt trauma and 0% in patients who had stab wounds. Eighty patients had a post-operative complication. A pancreatic leak (n = 26) was the most common pancreatic related complication. Median postoperative stay in 28 patients with no or grade I complications was 9 days; in 11 patients with grade II complications was 18 days; in 14 grade IIIa, 31 days; in 19 grade IIIb, 38 days; in 8 grade IVa, 33 days in 14 grade IVb, and in 13 grade V the duration of postoperative stay was 14 ± 39.4 days.

Conclusions

Overall mortality for distal pancreatectomy was 12%. Pancreatic leak was a common cause of morbidity. Length of hospitalisation increased with increasing Clavien–Dindo severity grading. There was a significant difference in the duration of hospitalisation in patients with no or grade I complications compared to those with grade II–IV injuries (p < 0.05).     

A modified Kampala trauma score (KTS) effectively predicts mortality in trauma patients

BackgroundMortality prediction in trauma patients has relied upon injury severity scoring tools focused on anatomical injury. This study sought to examine whether an injury severity scoring system which includes physiologic data performs as well as anatomic injury scores in mortality prediction.MethodsUsing data collected from 18 Level I trauma centers and 51 non-trauma center hospitals in the US, anatomy based injury severity scores (ISS), new injury severity scores (NISS) were calculated as were scores based on a modified version of the physiology-based Kampala trauma score (KTS). Because pre-hospital intubation, when required, is standard of care in the US, a modified KTS was calculated excluding respiratory rate. The predictive ability of the modified KTS for mortality was compared with the ISS and NISS using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.ResultsA total of 4716 individuals were eligible for study. Each of the three scores was a statistically significant predictor of mortality. In this sample, the modified KTS significantly outperformed the ISS (AUC = 0.83, 95% CI 0.81–0.84 vs. 0.77, 95% CI 0.76–0.79, respectively) and demonstrated similar predictive ability compared to the NISS (AUC = 0.83, 95% CI 0.81–0.84 vs. 0.82, 95% CI 0.80–0.83, respectively).ConclusionsThe modified KTS may represent a useful tool for assessing trauma mortality risk in real time, as well as in administrative data where physiologic measures are available. Further research is warranted and these findings suggest that the collection of physiologic measures in large databases may improve outcome prediction.     

The presence of the adult respiratory distress syndrome does not worsen mortality or discharge disability in blunt trauma patients with severe traumatic brain injury

PURPOSE: To evaluate the prevalence of the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) among blunt trauma patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) and to determine if ARDS is associated with higher mortality, morbidity and worse discharge outcome. METHODS: Blunt trauma patients with TBI (head abbreviated injury score (AIS)> or =4) who developed predefined ARDS criteria between January 2000 and December 2004 were prospectively collected as part of an ongoing ARDS database. Each patient in the TBI+ARDS group was matched with two control TBI patients based on age, injury severity score (ISS) and head AIS. Outcomes including complications, mortality and discharge disability were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Among 362 TBI patients, 28 (7.7%) developed ARDS. There were no differences between the two groups with respect to age, sex, ISS, Glasgow coma score (GCS), head, abdomen and extremity AIS. The TBI+ARDS group had significantly more patients with chest AIS> or =3 (57.1% versus 32.1%, p=0.03). There was no difference with respect to overall mortality between the TBI+ARDS group (50.0%) and the TBI group (51.8%) (OR 0.79: 95% CI 0.31-2.03, p=0.63). There was no significant difference with respect to discharge functional capacity between the two groups. There were significantly more overall complications in the TBI+ARDS group (42.9%) compared to the TBI group (16.1%) (OR 3.66: 95% CI 1.19-11.24, p=0.02). The TBI+ARDS group had an overall mean intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay of 15.6 days, versus 8.4 days in the TBI group (p<0.01). The TBI+ARDS group had significantly higher hospital charges than the TBI group ($210,097 versus $115,342, p<0.01). CONCLUSION: The presence of ARDS was not associated with higher mortality or worse discharge disability. It was, however, associated with higher hospital morbidity, longer ICU and hospital length of stay.     

A predictive model of early mortality in trauma patients

Background

Rapid thrombelastography (rTEG) is a real-time whole-blood viscoelastic coagulation assay. We hypothesized that admission rTEG and clinical data are independent predictors of trauma-related mortality.

Methods

Prospective observational data (patient demographics, admission vital signs, laboratory studies, and injury characteristics) from trauma patients enrolled within 6 hours of injury were collected. Mann–Whitney U test and analysis of variance test assessed significance (P ≤ .05). Logistic regression analyses determined the association of the studied variables with 24-hour mortality.

Results

Seven hundred ninety-five trauma patients were enrolled, of which 55 died within 24 hours of admission. Admission variables which independently predicted 24-hour mortality were as follows: Glasgow Coma Scale ≤8, hemoglobin <11 g/dL, international normalized ratio >1.5, Ly30 >8%, and penetrating injury (P < .05). This 5-variable model's area under the receiver operator characteristic curve was .88. The Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test was .90.

Conclusions

This 5-variable model provides a rapid prediction of 24-hour mortality. The inclusion of rTEG Ly30 demonstrates the association of fibrinolysis with outcome and may support the early use of antifibrinolytic therapies.     

Lactate: early predictor of morbidity and mortality in patients with severe burns

A severe burn results in a devastating and unique derangement called burn shock. Historically, resuscitation has been guided by a combination of basic laboratory values, invasive monitoring and clinical findings, but the optimal guide to the endpoint of resuscitation remains controversial. One-hundred sixty-six patients, who were admitted to our Burn Unit, were enrolled in this prospective study. Resuscitation of these patients was undertaken according to the current standard of care. Parkland formula was used as a first approximation of acquired fluid administration rates and fluid administration was adapted in order to meet clinical needs. The aim of this study was to evaluate if plasma lactate is a useful parameter to estimate the severity of a burn shock. One of the main objectives was to evaluate, if the lactate clearance adds additional information. The results of this study indicate that the initial lactate level (Day 0) is a useful parameter to separate survivors from non-survivors.

Moreover, a significant marker of shock and resuscitation was observed in evaluating the lactate clearance on Day 1. A better chance of survival occurs when resuscitation results in a lactate clearance to normal values within 24 h (survival was 68% if the lactate reached normal values, compared to 32% if the lactate level remained supra-normal).

In summary, we believe that measuring lactate and lactate clearance may help to detect critically injured patients either for adequacy of treatment, or selection of other therapeutic options.     

The effectiveness of orthopaedic trauma theatres in decreasing morbidity and mortality: a study of 701 displaced subcapital hip fractures in two trauma centres

In countries with universal health care systems patients frequently wait days for their "emergency" surgery. A general trend in orthopaedic traumatology is the advent of daily, dedicated orthopaedic trauma theatres. Availability of trauma theatres is believed to decrease morbidity and mortality, but this remains unproven. A retrospective review comparing morbidity and mortality outcomes between two similar level-one trauma centres (one without a dedicated trauma room system) was undertaken. We reviewed 701 elderly patients receiving hemiarthroplasties for displaced subcapital hip fractures over a 76-month period. Patients were similar between centres in terms of age, gender ratio and comorbidities. Statistically significant differences were found favouring the dedicated trauma room system with approximately half the operative delay and post-operative morbidity. A trend towards decreased mortality was also seen. This study supports the use of regular orthopaedic trauma theatres in tertiary care institutions.     

The role of cardiac morbidity in short- and long-term mortality in injured older patients who survive initial resuscitation

BACKGROUND: Elderly patients are an increasingly larger group of injured trauma care patients. Comorbidities influence outcome. Little is known of short- and long-term mortality in the elderly who survive initial resuscitation. METHODS: Short- and long-term mortality was retrospectively analyzed in 363 consecutively injured patients (Injury severity score >15) surviving more than 3 days after admission to a level 1 trauma center (including 197 patients >60 years). Cardiac morbidity was the focus. RESULTS: Survival to hospital discharge was similar comparing older patients with the entire group. Mortality increased incrementally with age. In older patients, cardiac morbidity was observed in 28% (fatal in 7); 2-year mortality was 36% (older group) and 60% (patients sustaining cardiac complications). Most elderly (80%) were discharged to long-term care. CONCLUSIONS: Elderly who survive initial resuscitation are as likely to survive to discharge as younger patients, but long-term survival is significantly lower as age increases. Cardiac morbidity is associated with higher long-term mortality. Most elderly are discharged to long-term care.     

Development and validation of a new simplified anatomic trauma mortality score

BackgroundMost trauma mortality prediction scores are complex in nature. GAP (Glasgow Coma Scale, Age, Systolic blood pressure) and mGAP (mechanism, Glasgow Coma Scale, Age, Systolic blood pressure) scores are relatively simple scoring tools. However, these scores were not validated in low and middle income countries including Malaysia and its accuracies are influenced by the fluctuating physiologic parameters. This study aims to develop a relevant simplified anatomic trauma scoring system for the local trauma patients in Malaysia.MethodA total of 3825 trauma patients from 2011 to 2016 were extracted from the Hospital Sultanah Aminah Trauma Surgery Registry. Patients were split into a development sample (n = 2683) and a validation sample (n = 1142). Univariate analysis is applied to identify significant anatomic predictors. These predictors were further analyzed using multivariable logistic regression to develop the new score and compared to existing score systems. The quality of prediction was determined regarding discrimination using sensitivity, specificity and receiver operating characteristic [ROC] curve.ResultsExisting simplified score systems (GAP & mGAP) revealed areas under the ROC curve of 0.825 and 0.806. The newly developed HeCLLiP (Head, cervical spine, lung, liver, pelvic fracture) score combines only five anatomic components: injury involving head, cervical spine, lung, liver and pelvic bone. The probabilities of mortality can be estimated by charting the total score points onto a graph chart or using the cut-off value of (>2) with a sensitivity of 79.2 and specificity of 70.6% on the validation dataset. The HeCLLiP score achieved comparable values of 0.802 for the area under the ROC curve in validation samples.ConclusionHeCLLiP Score is a simplified anatomic score suited to the local Malaysian population with a good predictive ability for trauma mortality.     

Preventability of trauma deaths in a Dutch Level-1 trauma centre

Background

Monitoring the quality of trauma care is frequently done by analysing the preventability of trauma deaths and errors during trauma care. In the Academic Medical Center trauma deaths are discussed during a monthly Morbidity and Mortality meeting. In this study an external multidisciplinary panel assessed the trauma deaths and errors in management of a Dutch Level-1 trauma centre for (potential) preventability.

Methods

All patients who died during or after presentation in the trauma resuscitation room in a 2-year period were eligible for review. All information on trauma evaluation and management was summarised by an independent research fellow. An external multidisciplinary panel individually evaluated the cases for preventability of death. Potential errors or mismanagements during the admission were classified for type, phase and domain. Overall agreement on (potential) preventability was compared between the external panel and the internal M&M consensus.

Results

Of the 62 evaluated trauma deaths one was judged as preventable and 17 were judged as potentially preventable by the review panel. Overall agreement on preventability between the review panel and the internal consensus was moderate (Kappa 0.51). The external panel judged one death as preventable compared with three from the internal consensus. The interobserver agreement between the external panel members was also moderate (Kappa 0.43). The panel judged 31 errors to have occurred in the (potential) preventable death group and 23 errors in the non-preventable death group. Such errors included choice or sequence of diagnostics, rewarming of hypothermic patients, and correction of coagulopathies.

Conclusions

The preventable death rate in the present study was comparable to data in the available literature. Compared to internal review, the external, multidisciplinary review did not find a higher preventable death rate, although it provided several insights to optimise trauma care.     

Intensive care unit design and mortality in trauma patients

Background

The architecture of medical care facilities ca affect the safety of a patient, but it is unknown if the architecture affects outcomes. We hypothesized that patients in rooms who are more visible from the central nursing station would experience better outcomes than those patients in less visible rooms.

Materials and methods

A total of 773 patients admitted to the trauma intensive care service over a 12-mo period were retrospectively evaluated. Outcomes were hospital mortality and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS). The unit is designed with a bank of high-visibility rooms (HVRs) directly across from the nursing station and two side sections of low-visibility rooms (LVRs). No formal triage occurs, but patients are prioritized to HVRs as available.

Results

Patients in the HVRs had a 16% mortality (52 of 320); meanwhile, the patients in the LVRs experienced an 11% mortality (49 of 448, P = 0.03). ICU mortality did not differ significantly when controlling for age, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), Head Abbreviated Injury Score, and the Injury Severity Score (ISS) (P = 0.076). Age, CCI, Head Abbreviated Injury Score, and ISS did individually correlate with mortality (age: P = 0.0008; CCI: P = 0.017; and ISS: P < 0.0001). Visibility was not a predictor of ICU LOS or complications among survivors (mean ICU HVR LOS = 4.8 d; mean ICU LVR LOS = 4.7; P = 0.88, n = 661). Only ISS was a significant predictor of ICU LOS and complications (P < 0.0001).

Conclusions

Trauma patient room placement within the ICU does not relate to mortality rate significantly when corrected for patient acuity. Instead, variables such as age, ISS, and CCI are associated with mortality. A policy of placing more critically ill patients in HVRs may prevent increased mortality in high-acuity patients.     

Predicting factors for major trauma patient mortality analyzed from trauma registry system

ObjectiveWe investigated the predictors of mortality in major trauma patients using a trauma registry system database.MethodsData were obtained from the trauma registry of a level I trauma center for all patients aged ≥18 years admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) between January 1, 2006 and December 31, 2013. Models were adjusted for patient demographics, injury mechanism, preexisting comorbidity, Glasgow coma scale (GCS), injury severity score (ISS), emergency department (ED) and ICU procedures, surgical procedures, and complications. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to determine predictors of mortality and odds ratios of its associated factors.ResultsIn total, 1561 patients met the inclusion criteria. The overall mortality rate was 13.4%. After controlling for all variables in a logistic regression model, the factors associated with increased mortality risk (P < 0.05) were age ≥ 45 years; ISS > 24; GCS score < 8 and 8–12; fall accident; preexisting comorbidity of renal insufficiency; ED cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) procedures; ICU blood transfusion; and cardiovascular, respiratory, digestive system and infection complications.ConclusionOur data showed some predictors of patient mortality after major trauma, most of which were determined during the trauma event. Only those treatment complications may be improved when performing the treatment procedures.     

Predictors of blunt abdominal aortic injury in trauma patients and mortality analysis

ObjectiveBlunt abdominal aortic injury (BAAI) occurs in less than 0.1% of blunt traumas. A previous multi-institutional study found an associated mortality rate of 39%. We sought to identify risk factors for BAAI and risk factors for mortality in patients with BAAI using a large national database. We hypothesized that an Injury Severity Score of 25 or greater, and thoracic trauma would both increase the risk of mortality in patients with BAAI.MethodsThe Trauma Quality Improvement Program (2010-2016) was queried for individuals with blunt trauma. Patients with and without BAAI were compared. Covariates were included in a multivariable logistic regression model to determine mechanisms of injury, examination findings, and concomitant injuries associated with increased risk for BAAI. An additional multivariable analysis was performed for mortality in patients with BAAI.ResultsFrom 1,056,633 blunt trauma admissions, 1012 (0.1%) had BAAI. The most common mechanism of injury was motor vehicle accident (MVA; 57.5%). More than one-half the patients had at least one rib fracture (54.0%), or a spine fracture (53.9%), whereas 20.8% had hypotension on admission and 7.8% had a trunk abrasion. The average length of stay was 13.4 days and 24.6% required laparotomy, with 6.6% receiving an endovascular repair and 2.9% an open repair. The risk of death in those treated with endovascular vs open repair was similar (P = .28). On multivariable analysis, MVA was the mechanism associated with the highest risk of BAAI (odds ratio [OR], 4.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.87-5.65; P < .001) followed by pedestrian struck (OR, 4.54; 95% CI, 3.47-5.92; P < .001). Other factors associated with BAAI included hypotension on admission (OR, 3.87; 95% CI, 3.21-4.66; P < .001), hemopneumothorax (OR, 3.67; 95% CI, 1.16-11.58; P < .001), abrasion to the trunk (OR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.15-1.94; P = .003), and rib fracture (OR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.25-1.70; P < .001). The overall mortality rate was 28.0%. Of the variables examined, the strongest risk factor associated with mortality in patients with BAAI was hemopneumothorax (OR, 12.49; 95% CI, 1.25-124.84; P = .03) followed by inferior vena cava (IVC) injury (OR, 12.05; 95% CI, 2.80-51.80; P < .001).ConclusionsIn the largest nationwide series to date, BAAI continues to have a high mortality rate with hemopneumothorax and IVC injury associated with the highest risk for mortality. The mechanism most strongly associated with BAAI is MVA followed by pedestrian struck. Other risk factors for BAAI include rib fracture and trunk abrasion. Providers must maintain a high suspicion of injury for BAAI when these mechanisms of injury, physical examination or imaging findings are encountered.     

The Malawi trauma score: A model for predicting trauma-associated mortality in a resource-poor setting

BackgroundGlobally, traumatic injury is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in low-income countries. Current tools for predicting trauma-associated mortality are often not applicable in low-resource environments due to a lack of diagnostic adjuncts. This study sought to derive and validate a model for predicting mortality that requires only a history and physical exam.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of all patients recorded in the Kamuzu Central Hospital trauma surveillance registry in Lilongwe, Malawi from 2011 through 2014. Using statistical randomization, 80% of patients were used for derivation and 20% were used for validation. Logistic regression modeling was used to derive factors associated with mortality and the Malawi Trauma Score (MTS) was constructed. The model fitness was tested.Results62,354 patients are included. Patients are young (mean age 23.0, SD 15.9 years) with a male preponderance (72%). Overall mortality is 1.8%. The MTS is tabulated based on initial mental status (alert, responds to voice, responds only to pain or worse), anatomical location of the most severe injury, the presence or absence of a radial pulse on examination, age, and sex. The score range is 2–32. A mental status exam of only responding to pain or worse, head injury, the absence of a radial pulse, extremes of age, and male sex all conferred a higher probability of mortality. The ROC area under the curve for the derivation cohort and validation cohort were 0.83 (95% CI 0.78, 0.87) and 0.83 (95% CI 0.75, 0.92), respectively. A MTS of 25 confers a 50% probability of death.ConclusionsThe MTS provides a reliable tool for trauma triage in sub-Saharan Africa and helps risk stratify patient populations. Unlike other models previously developed, its strength is its utility in virtually any environment, while reliably predicting injury- associated mortality.     

Timing of mortality in pediatric trauma patients: A National Trauma Data Bank analysis

Background/purpose

The classic “trimodal” distribution of death has been described in adult patients, but the timing of mortality in injured children is not well understood. The purpose of this study was to define the temporal distribution of mortality in pediatric trauma patients.

Perioperative hypotension and discharge outcomes in non-critically injured trauma patients,a single centre retrospective cohort study

BackgroundThere is a lack of information on the effect of age on perioperative care and outcomes after minor trauma in the elderly. We examined the association between perioperative hypotension and discharge outcome among non-critically injured adult patients.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective study of non-critically ill patients (ISS <9 or discharged within less than 24 h) who received anaesthesia care for surgery and Recovery Room care at a level-1 trauma centre between 5/1/2012 and 11/30/2013. Perioperative hypotension was defined as systolic blood pressure (SBP) <90 mmHg (traditional measure) for all patients, and SBP <110 mmHg (strict measure) for patients ≥65 years. Poor outcome was defined as death or discharge to skilled nursing facility/hospice.Results1744 patients with mean ISS 4.4 across age groups were included; 169 (10%) were ≥65 years. Among patients ≥ 65 years, intraoperative hypotension occurred in >75% (131/169, traditional measure) and in >95% (162/169, strict measure); recovery room hypotension occurred in 2% (4/169) and 29% (49/169), respectively. Mean age-adjusted anaesthetic agent concentration (MAC) was similar across age groups. Opioid use decreased from 9.3 (SD 5.7) mg/h morphine equivalents in patients <55 years to 6.2 (SD 4.0) mg/h in patients over 85 years. Adjusted for gender, ASA score, anaesthesia duration, morphine equivalent/hr, fluid balance, MAC and surgery type, and using traditional definition, older patients were more likely than patients <55 to experience perioperative hypotension: aRR 1.21, 95% CI 1.11–1.30 for 55–64 and aRR 1.19, 95% CI 1.07–1.32 for ages 65–74. Perioperative hypotension was associated with poor discharge outcome (aRR 1.55; 95% CI 1.04–2.31 and aRR 1.87; 95% CI 1.17–2.98, respectively).ConclusionDespite age related reduction in doses of volatile anaesthetic and opioids administered during anaesthesia care, and regardless of hypotension definition used, non-critically injured patients undergoing surgery experience a large perioperative hypotension burden. This burden is higher for patients 55–74 years and older and is a risk factor for poor discharge outcomes, independent of age and ASA status.     

Diagnostic performance of serial haematocrit measurements in identifying major injury in adult trauma patients

Determination of occult haemorrhage is an essential part of trauma assessment. We evaluated the diagnostic utility of decreasing haematocrit (DeltaHct) in detecting major injury. Additionally, we tested the correlation between the volume of infused intravenous fluid (IVF) and DeltaHct. METHODS: Prospective observational study at a level one trauma centre. Inclusion criteria: Patients with suspected major injury. exclusion criteria: Patients who received blood transfusion in the first 4 h, and those who deceased or were transferred to other units before the completion of the observation period (4 h). We measured IVF and DeltaHct at 4 h after triage. We classified patients as having minor or major injury on the basis of injury severity score > or =15. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve was used to test the diagnostic performance of DeltaHct in identifying major injury. We tested the operating characteristics of DeltaHct cut-off values of 5 and 10 in detecting major injury. We also measured the correlation of IVF and DeltaHct in a subgroup of patients with low potential for blood loss (ISS<3) to account for possibility of haemodilution. RESULTS: Four hundred and ninety-four patients (convenience sample) were enrolled (age 36+/-17 years, 82% male, 57% blunt trauma). Sixty-three patients (13%) had major injury. The area under the ROC curve for DeltaHct was not significantly different from the unity line (p=0.20). DeltaHct-4 h>5 points had a sensitivity of 40% (95% CI, 29-52%), specificity of 94% (95% CI, 92-96%), likelihood ratio for a positive test (LR+) of 7.1 (95% CI, 4.4-11.7), and likelihood ratio for a negative test (-LR) of 0.64 (95% CI, 0.52-0.78) in identifying major trauma. DeltaHct-4 h>10 points had sensitivity of 16% (95% CI, 9-27%), specificity of 95% (95% CI, 92-0.96%), +LR of 3.0 (95% CI, 1.5-5.9), and -LR of 0.89 (95% CI, 0.80-0.99). In our subgroup analysis, we detected no significant correlation (p=0.09) between the IVF and DeltaHct-4 h. CONCLUSIONS: DeltaHct-4 h>5 or 10 points is suggestive of major injury (high specificity and +LR). However, the failure to drop the Hct cannot be used to rule out major injury (low sensitivity and -LR).     

Factors affecting anatomical region of injury, severity, and mortality for road trauma in a high-income developing country: Lessons for prevention

Objectives

To study the factors affecting anatomical region of injury, severity, and mortality among road users in United Arab Emirates so as to improve preventive measures.

Methods

Data of the Trauma Registry of Al Ain city were collected prospectively over 3 years (2003-2006) at the main trauma hospital. For traffic injuries, the following were assessed: gender, nationality, road user type, anatomical region(s) of injury, systolic blood pressure on admission, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), Injury Severity Score (ISS), and mortality. Analysis included frequencies, cross-tabulations, and logistic regression.

Results

There were 1070 patients, 89% male, 25% UAE nationals, and with a mean age of 31 years. Expatriates, mainly from non-Arabic speaking, low-income countries, accounted for 88% of injured pedestrians, whilst nationals were overrepresented among vehicle occupants (29%), and motorcyclists 37%. Injuries of the extremities and head were frequent among pedestrians, motorcyclists, and bicyclists, whilst head and spine injuries were most common among front and rear vehicle occupants and drivers. The median ISS was five for pedestrians and four for all other road user types, including rear vehicle occupants. The mean hospitalisation was 9.7 days; 13% of patients were admitted to ICU with mean stay of 6.5 days. Overall mortality was 4%; pedestrians accounted for 61% of deaths. Predictors of mortality were GCS (p < 0.001), ISS (p < 0.01) and systolic blood pressure on admission (p < 0.03).

Conclusions

Head injury was a major factor affecting mortality, followed by injury severity and hypotension. To reduce injury incidence and severity, legislation and education are needed to ensure use of seat belts by all vehicle occupants including rear passengers, high-visibility devices by other road users, helmets by motorcyclists and bicyclists, protective clothing and boots for motorcyclists, and traffic engineering for pedestrians.     

Characterisation of orthopaedic trauma admitted to adult level 1 trauma centres

BACKGROUND: Despite the vast number of traumatic injuries that are orthopaedic in nature, comprehensive epidemiological data that characterise orthopaedic trauma are limited. The aim of this study was to investigate the nature of orthopaedic trauma admitted to adult Level 1 Trauma Centres. METHODS: Data were obtained from the Victorian Orthopaedic Trauma Outcomes Registry (VOTOR), which includes all patients with orthopaedic trauma admitted to the two adult Level 1 Trauma Centres in Victoria (Australia). Information was collected from the medical record and hospital databases on patients' demographics and injury event, diagnoses and management. RESULTS: Data were analysed on 784 patients recruited between August 2003 and March 2004. Patients were mainly young (<65 years) (70.7%), male (59.1%) and injured in a transport collision (51.3%). Fractures of the femur (23.7%) and spine (23.5%) were the most common injuries and were predominately managed with operative (87.6%) and conservative (78.8%) methods, respectively. Differences in most parameters were evident between younger (<65 years) and older (> or =65 years) patients. CONCLUSIONS: This study presents epidemiological data on patients with orthopaedic trauma who were admitted to adult Level 1 Trauma Centres. This information is critical for the future monitoring and evaluation of the outcomes of orthopaedic trauma.