Severity of diabetic retinopathy and its relationship with age at onset of diabetes mellitus in India: A multicentric study

Purpose:To present clinical profile and risk factors of sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy (STDR) among people with age of onset of diabetes (AOD) <25 versus ≥25 years.Methods:A retrospective chart analysis of consecutive patients with diabetic retinopathy (DR) n = 654) treated at 14 eye care centers across India between 2018 and 2019 was performed. Patients were divided into two groups, Group 1: AOD <25 years and Group 2: AOD ≥25 years. DR and diabetic macular edema (DME) were classified using the International Clinical Classification of DR severity scale. STDR included severe nonproliferative DR (NPDR), proliferative DR (PDR), and moderate to severe DME. A multilevel mixed-effects model was used for comparison between two groups: 1) Patients with DR and AOD <25 years and 2) Patients with DR and AOD ≥25 years. Bivariate and multivariate regression analyses were used to evaluate risk factors between the two groups.Results:A total of 654 patients were included, 161 (307 eyes) in AOD <25 and 493 (927 eyes) in AOD >25 group. There was a higher prevalence of PDR with high-risk characteristics in AOD <25 group (24% vs. 12%) at baseline and 12-month follow-up (25% vs. 6%); P < 0.001. Systolic hypertension and poor glycemic control were risk factors in both groups, with no difference in these modifiable risk factors between groups.Conclusion:People with youth-onset DM are likely to present with severer form of STDR despite similar modifiable risk factors. Therefore, strict control of systolic blood pressure, glycemic status, and regular screening for DR are recommended to reduce the risk of STDR irrespective of the age of onset of diabetes.     

Prevalence of diabetic retinopahty in India: Results from the National Survey 2015-19

Purpose:Diabetes mellitus (DM) and diabetic retinopathy (DR) contribute to ocular morbidity and are emerging as diseases with significant public health impact. Our aim was to assess the countrywide prevalence of DR and sight-threatening DR (STDR) among persons with diabetes and to evaluate the coverage of DR examinations among them.Methods:The present survey was planned to estimate the burden of DR in the population aged ≥50 years for assisting in the planning and prioritization of diabetic eye services. For this survey, 21 districts with a high prevalence of DM were selected among the 31 districts where the national blindness and visual impairment survey was conducted. The total sample size was 63,000 people aged 50 years and above. DR was assessed by dilated fundus examination with indirect ophthalmoscope and was graded according to Scottish DR grading. STDR included severe nonproliferative DR, proliferative DR, and clinically significant macular edema.Results:The prevalence of diabetes in the surveyed population was 11.8%. Among them, one-third were newly diagnosed DM, that is, diagnosed at the time of the survey. The study revealed that the prevalence of DR among persons with diabetes was 16.9%, the prevalence of STDR was 3.6%, and the prevalence of mild retinopathy was 11.8%. Risk factors for DR in the current study were duration of diabetes (>10 years, OR 4.8, 95% CI: 3.3–6.9), poor glycemic control (≥200 mg/dL, OR: 1.5, 95% CI: 1.2–1.7) and insulin treatment (OR: 2.6, 95% CI: 1.7–4.1).Conclusion:The current study highlights the substantial burden of DM and DR in India and the critical need to adopt a coordinated and multisectoral approach to reduce their prevalence. There is a need for early identification of persons with diabetes and their routine screening for DR along with availability of treatment facilities.     

Knowledge,attitude, and practice patterns and the purported reasons for delayed presentation of patients with sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy at a tertiary eye-care facility in Central India: A questionnaire-based study

Purpose:To identify the reasons for delayed presentation among patients with sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy (STDR) and to assess their knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) patterns in context to diabetes mellitus (DM) and diabetic retinopathy (DR).Methods:Single-center, cross-sectional, questionnaire-based KAP survey. All consecutive cases of STDR who presented to our tertiary eye care facility from June 2020 to November 2020 were recruited. The KAP scoring survey tool was incorporated into the questionnaire to help evaluate and represent the patient''s disease.Results:170 patients with STDR were enrolled in the study. The mean age of patients was 54 ± 9.34 years (Range: 21–70 years); 110 patients (64.7%) were between 41 and 60 years; 131 patients (76%) had DM for more than 5 years. The STDR changes were more prevalent in patients with an educational qualification of high school or less (n = 142; 83.5%). Fifty-two patients (30.6%) had been informed regarding the detrimental effect of diabetes on the eyes and were recommended to consult an ophthalmologist by the treating physician. Of these, 24 (46.15%) patients were educated about retinal changes due to diabetes. Eighty-five (50%) patients in our study had good knowledge about DM; 13 (7.6%) patients had good knowledge about DR. For patients not compliant for follow-ups with the treating physician, the use of “home glucometers for self-monitoring (n = 60, 35.3%) was the most prevalent reason. The main reason for poor compliance for undergoing a dilated fundus examination by the ophthalmologist was “Had good vision, so didn’t feel the need” in 143 (90.5%) patients.Conclusion:The absence of visual complaints, lack of knowledge, and failure to undergo a dilated fundus examination in the past were the prevalent risk factors in patients presenting with STDR. Knowledge/practice about DR was poor among the patients with STDR. The treating physicians and ophthalmologists were the most common sources for patient education.     

Clinical correlation of diabetic retinopathy with nephropathy and neuropathy

Purpose:To evaluate the presence of nephropathy and neuropathy in patients with diabetic retinopathy (DR) and to correlate the severity of DR to that of diabetic nephropathy and diabetic neuropathy.Methods:This prospective noninterventional hospital-based study included 57 consecutive cases of DR of either sex, presenting to the eye OPD between January 2019 and November 2020 with minimum 5-year duration of Type 1 and 2 DM. Complete ophthalmic examination was done and DR was classified according to early treatment diabetic retinopathy study classification. Severity of diabetic nephropathy was based on urine albumin creatinine ratio and estimated glomerular filtration rate. Severity of diabetic neuropathy was based on nerve conduction velocity.Results:The study was conducted on 57 patients of whom patients 45 were males and 12 were females. Mild nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy was present in 22 patients, moderate in 14 patients, severe in 18 patients, and proliferative diabetic retinopathy in 3 patients. In our study, group 30 patients of DR presented without clinically significant macular edema (CSME) and 27 patients presented with CSME. The distribution of severity of DR according to CSME was observed to be statistically significant (P<<0.05). The association of severity of DR with severity of diabetic nephropathy was observed to be statistically significant (P<<0.05). The association of severity of DR with that of diabetic neuropathy was inconclusive.Conclusion:The association of severity of DR with severity of diabetic nephropathy and diabetic neuropathy can be used as a marker for future chronic kidney diseases progression and also to prognosticate neurological outcomes in diabetic patients.     

Clinical profile and magnitude of diabetic retinopathy: An electronic medical record–driven big data analytics from an eye care network in India

Purpose:This study aimed to describe the clinical profile and magnitude of diabetic retinopathy (DR) in patients presenting to a multitier eye hospital network in India.Methods:This cross-sectional hospital-based study included 263,419 individuals with diabetes mellitus (DM) presenting between February 2012 and February 2021 (9-year period). The data were collected using an electronic medical record (EMR). Patients with a clinical diagnosis of DR in at least one eye were included in the analysis. Severe nonproliferative DR/proliferative DR/diabetic macular edema (DME) were considered sight-threatening DR (STDR).Results:In the study period, 25% (n = 66,913) were new patients diagnosed with DR. The majority of patients were males (70%). The mean age of the patients was 57 ± 10 years. The risk factors for DR were increased age: 30 to 50 years (odds ratio [OR] = 2.42), and 51 to 70 years (OR = 3.02), increased duration of DM: 6 to 10 years (OR = 2.88) and >10 years (OR = 6.52), blindness (OR = 2.42), male gender (OR = 1.36), lower socioeconomic status (OR = 1.43), and rural habitation (OR = 1.09). STDR was seen in 58% (n = 38,538) of examined patients. Risk factors for STDR were increased age 31 to 50 years (OR = 3.51), increased duration of DM: 6 to 10 years (OR = 1.23) and >10 years (OR = 1.68), blindness (OR = 3.68), male gender (OR = 1.12), and higher socioeconomic status (OR = 1.09).Conclusion:Every fourth person with DM was found to have DR, and every second person with DR had STDR in this study cohort. These real-world big data might provide greater insight into the current status of DR. Additional big data from similar EMR-based sources will help in planning and resource allocation.     

Factors protecting against diabetic retinopathy in a geriatric Indian cohort

Purpose:Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a potentially sight-threatening complication of diabetes mellitus. The majority of cases are in older adults. This study aims to evaluate modifiable and nonmodifiable protective factors against DR in a geriatric Indian population.Methods:This retrospective observational study uses data from a multitiered ophthalmology network to evaluate several demographic and clinical variables against diabetic retinopathy and visual acuity.Results:Our data show that high myopia, the female sex, and no cataract surgery are associated with lower prevalence of DR (OR = 0.21, 0.65, and 0.76, respectively; P < 0.001). We also found that among those with DR, people categorized as payers, retirees, and those living in urban or metropolitan areas have better visual acuity (OR = 0.65, 0.65, 0.83, and 0.73, respectively; P < 0.001). Among those with DR, females, presence of cataracts, and no cataract surgery had lower associations with sight-threatening DR (STDR) (OR = 0.68, 0.37, and 0.76, respectively; P < 0.001). Prevalence of DR decreased in older age groups while controlling for DM duration.Conclusion:It is probable that high myopia, the female sex, and better glycemic control are protective against DR and STDR in our study cohort of adults over 60 years of age. It is possible that occupations involving manual labor, delayed cataract surgery, and living past the age of 70 are also protective against DR.     

Impact of age-related macular degeneration on diabetic retinopathy: An electronic health record based big data analysis from a tertiary eye centre in South India

Purpose:To determine whether the presence of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) decreases the risk of diabetic retinopathy.Methods:This was a retrospective, case-cohort study performed in patients with a systemic diagnosis of diabetes at a tertiary health care center from May 2011 to April 2020. A total of 43,153 patients (1,024 AMD patients and 42,129 non-AMD patients) were included in the analysis. A total of 1,024 age and diabetes mellitus (DM) duration-matched controls were chosen from the non-AMD group for risk factor analysis. The severity of diabetic retinopathy was compared between the patients with AMD and the patients without AMD.Results:Out of the enrolled 43,153 diabetic patients, 26,906 were males and 16,247 were females. A total of 1,024 patients had AMD and 42,129 had no AMD. The mean age of the cohort was 58.60 ± 0.09 years. The overall prevalence of DR was noted to be 22.8% (9,825 out of 43,153 eyes). A significantly lower prevalence of diabetic retinopathy (DR) (23% in non-AMD, 11.4% in AMD, OR = −0.43, P < 0.001), non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) (12% in non-AMD, 8.2% in AMD, OR = −0.66, P < 0.001), and proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) (11% in non-AMD, 3.2% in AMD, OR = −0.27, P < 0.001) was seen in the AMD patients. No significant difference was seen between the dry and wet AMD. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, the lower age, absence of AMD, and male gender were associated with a higher risk of PDR.Conclusion:The presence of AMD was noted to statistically reduce the risk of DR. Our results may be useful in the field of resource allocation and awareness of DR.     

Failure to initiate early insulin therapy – A risk factor for diabetic retinopathy in insulin users with Type 2 diabetes mellitus: Sankara Nethralaya-Diabetic Retinopathy Epidemiology and Molecular Genetics Study (SN-DREAMS,Report number 35)

Context:Insulin users have been reported to have a higher incidence of diabetic retinopathy (DR).Aim:The aim was to elucidate the factors associated with DR among insulin users, especially association between duration, prior to initiating insulin for Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) and developing DR.Results:Insulin users had more incidence of DR (52.9% vs. 16.3%, P < 0.0001) and sight threatening DR (19.1% vs. 2.4%, P < 0.0001) in comparison to insulin nonusers. Among insulin users, longer duration of DM (odds ratio [OR] 1.12, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.00–1.25, P = 0.044) and abdominal obesity (OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.02–1.29, P = 0.021) was associated with DR. The presence of DR was significantly associated with longer duration (≥5 years) prior to initiating insulin therapy, overall (38.0% vs. 62.0%, P = 0.013), and in subjects with suboptimal glycemic control (32.5% vs. 67.5%, P = 0.022).Conclusions:The presence of DR is significantly associated with longer duration of diabetes (>5 years) and sub-optimal glycemic control (glycosylated hemoglobin <7.0%). Among insulin users, abdominal obesity was found to be a significant predictor of DR; DR is associated with longer duration prior to initiating insulin therapy in Type 2 DM subjects with suboptimal glycemic control.     

Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in self-reported diabetics among various ethnic groups and associated risk factors in North-East India: A hospital-based study

Purpose:To describe the prevalence and severity of diabetic retinopathy (DR) among different ethnic groups of North-East India and to study the associated risk factors.Methods:In this hospital based cross sectional study 7,133 individuals among the age group of 20-79 years, attending the OPD, were screened for presence of Diabetes Mellitus (DM) (HbA1c >7% or previously diagnosed). Among them, 780 (10.94%) had diabetes; they were evaluated for presence of any retinopathy (based on fundus photograph and fluorescein angiography), its grade (based on International DR severity scale), and risk factors. DR patients were further grouped into different ethnicities (Assamese, Bengali, minor tribes, and other immigrants).Results:Of the 780 patients with diabetes, 58 patients had type 1 DM and 722 patients had type 2 DM. The overall prevalence of DR was 30.0% with vision-threatening retinopathy and maculopathy being 10.00% and 4.49%, respectively. The prevalence of retinopathy range was the highest in the immigrants’ group (50.00% among type 1 DM and 44.93% among type 2 DM) and lowest in the tribal''s groups (16.67% among type 1 DM and 22.35% among type 2 DM). The risk factors showing significant association with DR were longer diabetes duration, older age, family history of diabetes, higher HbA1c level, associated hypertension, hypertriglyceridemia, and pregnancy state (P value <0.05).Conclusion:Every third patient with diabetes had some form of DR with Vision Threatening DR (VTDR) affecting every tenth patient. There was also a wide variation in the prevalence of DR among ethnic groups and this difference could not be attributed to variation in the known measurable risk factors among different ethnic groups, thus signifying the role of ethnicity in occurrence and severity of DR.     

Does myopia decrease the risk of diabetic retinopathy in both type-1 and type-2 diabetes mellitus?

Purpose:To study the relationship between the severity of myopia and the severity of diabetic retinopathy (DR) in individuals with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM).Methods:This retrospective study was conducted using data from electronic medical records from a multicentric eyecare network located in various geographic regions of India. Individuals with type 1 or type 2 DM were classified according to their refractive status. Severe nonproliferative DR (NPDR), PDR, or presence of clinically significant macular edema (CSME) with any type of DR was considered as vision-threatening diabetic retinopathy (VTDR).Results:A total of 472 individuals with type-1 DM (mean age 41 ± 10 years) and 9341 individuals with type-2 DM (52 ± 9 years) were enrolled. Individuals with a hyperopic refractive error had a significant positive association with the diagnosis of VTDR (odds ratio (OR) 1.26; 95%CI 1.04–1.51, P = 0.01) and moderate nonproliferative DR (OR 1.27; 95%CI 1.02–1.59, P = 0.03) in type-2 DM; however, no significant association was found in type-1 DM. After adjusting for age, gender, anisometropia, and duration of diabetes, the presence of high myopia (< - 6 D) reduced the risk of VTDR in type 2 DM (OR 0.18; 95% CI 0.04–0.77, P = 0.02), but no association was found in type 1 DM. Mild and moderate myopia had no significant association with any forms of DR in both type-1 and type-2 DM.Conclusion:Hyperopic refractive error was found to increase the risk of VTDR in persons with type 2 DM. High-myopic refractive error is protective for VTDR in type 2 DM, but not in type-1 DM.     

Relationship between diabetic retinopathy and diabetic peripheral neuropathy - Neurodegenerative and microvascular changes

Purpose:To determine the relationship between diabetic retinopathy (DR) and diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN), and their associated risk factors.Methods:We conducted a cross-sectional analysis on 500 patients who attended the Endocrinology department at a quaternary health care center in Kerala between November 2017 and April 2018. Patients above the age of 30 years with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) were included. They underwent a detailed medical history, dilated fundus examination for DR, assessment and grading of DPN, and blood investigations. Among these, 49 randomly selected patients without DR had peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and ganglion cell inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) assessed by optical coherence tomogram. RNFL and GCIPL changes in different grades of neuropathy were evaluated.Results:Out of 500 patients, 303 (60.6%) were males and 197 (39.4%) were females. Prevalence of DR was 48% and DPN 71.8%. Risk factors for the development of DR included duration of DM >15 years, HbA1c (glycated hemoglobin) greater than 6.5%, serum creatinine more than 1.5 mg/dl, and the presence of DPN. There was a statistically significant association between DR and DPN. There was significant thinning of GCIPL in patients with moderate to severe neuropathy without DR.Conclusion:There is a significant association between DR and DPN and their severities. There are early changes in inner retinal layers of diabetic patients without microvascular changes of DR. These neurodegenerative changes parallel DPN in the course of DM. Our study stresses the importance of multidisciplinary approach in the management of diabetes and its complications.     

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) among 40 years and older Saudi population with diabetes in Riyadh governorate,Saudi Arabia – A population based survey

PurposeTo present the prevalence and determinants of diabetic retinopathy (DR) among more than 40 years old Saudi population.MethodsA population based survey was conducted in Riyadh district between 2014 and 2017. All Saudi aged >40 years suffering from diabetes and confirmed in the diabetes register of the Primary Health Center (PHC) were the study population. Representative sample was examined. The Best corrected Visual acuity (BCVA), anterior and posterior segment assessment was performed. Digital fundus camera captured the retinal images. DR was graded into No DR, Non-proliferative DR (Mild, Moderate, Severe) and proliferative DR (PDR). Diabetic macular edema (DME) was separately noted. Sight Threatening Diabetic Retinopathy (STDR) included PDR and/or DME.ResultsWe examined 890 persons. The age sex adjusted prevalence of DR was 44.7% (95% CI 44.1 – 45.3). The DR among male was significantly higher than in females. [RR = 1.4 (95% CI 1.02 – 1.8)]. The DR in 60 plus population was higher compared to 40 to 60 years old diabetics [RR = 1.64 (95% CI 1.6 – 1.7), P < 0.001]. The crude prevalence of STDR was 12.4% (95% CI 9.1 – 15.7). Among diabetic with DR, bilateral and unilateral Severe Visual Impairment (SVI) rate were 1% and 1.8%. The coverage of retinal laser treatment for STDR was 6.1%.ConclusionsThe DR among diabetics is high among adult Saudi population. Both DR and STDR were more in males. Visual disabilities among DR cases were few. For early detection and timely management the services need urgent attention.     

Choroidal thickness in diabetic patients of Indian ethnicity

Purpose:To evaluate choroidal thickness (CT) change in various grades of diabetic retinopathy (DR) in comparison to age-matched healthy subjects.Methods:This prospective observational study included 227 eyes of 125 subjects with diabetes (study group: 58 females) and 197 eyes of 110 age-matched healthy subjects (control group: 66 females). Collected data included age, gender, duration of diabetes, glycemic control, comprehensive ocular examination, fundus photography, and CT measurement on spectral domain ocular coherence tomography using enhanced depth imaging.Results:Mean age in the study group was 57.0 ± 9.37 years (43–73 years). The mean age was 41.48 ± 5.43 years in the control group. Subjects with diabetes with (252.8 ± 55.6 microns) and without (261.71 ± 51.8 microns) retinopathy had significantly thinner choroids when compared to the control group (281.7 ± 47.7 microns; P = 0.032). Seventy-four of 227 eyes did not have any evidence of DR, 89 eyes had features of nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR), and 33 eyes had treatment naïve proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). Thirty-one PDR eyes had received previous laser photocoagulation. Subjects with diabetes without retinopathy had a greater subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT) than subjects with diabetes with retinopathy (P < 0.001). Eyes with PDR (243.9 ± 56.2 microns) had thinner SFCT than those with NPDR (238.98 ± 111.23 microns). There was no difference in the SFCT between treated (laser photocoagulation done; 251.784 ± 103.72 microns) and treatment naïve PDR (258.405 ± 89.47 microns, P = 0.23).Conclusions:Control eyes had greater SFCT compared to subjects with diabetes, with and without retinopathy. The thinning progressed with increasing severity of DR. Choroidal thinning may contribute to DR pathogenesis.     

Regional variation in diabetic retinopathy and associated factors in Spectrum of Eye Disease in Diabetes (SPEED) study in India—Report 5

Purpose:To study the zonal variations in diabetic retinopathy (DR) and associated factors in people with known type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) attending large eye care facilities in different regions of India.Methods:In this cross-sectional eye-care facility-based study, India was divided into five zones; large eye care facilities with a good referral base and offering an entire range of care for patients with DR were invited. First-time T2DM attendees aged ≥18 years were recruited. All subjects received a comprehensive systemic and ophthalmic examination. DR and systemic diseases were classified as per the international/national standards. Findings were compared between the zones and with the national average.Results:Fourteen eye-care facilities (15% public) from five zones participated. In the cohort of 11,173 people, there were more males (59%); the average age was above 45 years, and in 57%, DM had been diagnosed more than 5 years earlier. Compared with the overall study population, the proportion of people with any DR, sight-threatening DR, and blind were higher in the east zone (42.5%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 40.2–44.8; 24.3%, 95% CI 22.3–26.3, and 11.5%, respectively); diabetic macular edema was more frequent in the south zone (12.2%, 95% CI 11.2–13.2); people with moderate-to-severe visual impairment were more in the west zone (32.1%) and higher proportion of people in the south-central zone had systemic hypertension (56.8%, 95% CI 54.8–58.9).Conclusion:The zonal variation in DR and related vision loss could be related to variable health-seeking behavior, availability, and confidence in the available services.     

Diabetic retinopathy, visual impairment and ocular status among patients with diabetes mellitus in Yemen: A hospital-based study

Background:

We present a series of patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) who attended an eye hospital in Sana, Yemen during 2004.

Aim:

To determine the magnitude and risk factors of diabetic retinopathy (DR).

Design:

Cross-sectional study.

Materials and Methods:

Ophthalmologists assessed vision, ocular pressure, ocular media and posterior segment to note ocular manifestations among patients with DM. DR was graded by using bio-microscope and Volk lens. The prevalence and 95% confidence interval of ocular complications of DM were calculated. Risk factors of DR like age, sex, duration of diabetes and hypertension were evaluated.

Statistical Analysis:

Univariate and multivariate analysis.

Results:

Our series comprised 350 patients suffering from DM. The duration of diabetes was ≥15 years in 101 (29%) patients. Physician was treating 108 DM patients with insulin. The prevalence of DR was 55% (95% CI 49.6–60.1). The proportions of background diabetic retinopathy (BDR), preproliferative diabetic retinopathy (PPDR), proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) and diabetic macular edema were 20%, 13%, 17% and 22% respectively. The prevalence of blindness among DM patients was 16%. The prevalence of cataract and glaucoma was 34.3% and 8.6%. Duration of DM was the predictor of DR. One-fifth of the patients had sight-threatening DR and needed laser treatment.

Conclusions:

DR was of public health magnitude among our patients. An organized approach is recommended to address DR in the study area.     

Anemia and Diabetic Kidney Disease Had Joint Effect on Diabetic Retinopathy Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes

PurposeWhether the association between diabetic kidney disease (DKD) and diabetic retinopathy (DR) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is leveraged by anemia remains unclear. This study is to evaluate the joint effect of DKD and anemia on DR.MethodsData were collected from electronic medical records of 1389 patients with T2DM in the Yiwu Central Hospital of Zhejiang Province from 2018 to 2019. Based on retinal examination findings, patients were classified as without diabetic retinopathy (non-DR), non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR), and proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). Odds ratio (OR) from multinomial logistic regression models adjusting for potential risk factors of DR were used to evaluate associations of DKD, renal function measures, and anemia with risk of NPDR and PDR. Path analysis was performed to help understand the association of DKD and hemoglobin (Hb) with DR.ResultsThe study included 901 patients with non-DR, 367 patients with NPDR and 121 patients with PDR. Both high DKD risk and abnormal renal function measures were significantly associated with PDR. Anemia was associated with increased risk of NPDR (OR = 1.75, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.18–2.58) and PDR (OR = 3.71, 95% CI = 2.23–6.18). DKD severity and anemia had joint effect on NPDR (OR = 2.29, 95% CI = 1.32–3.96) and PDR (OR = 11.31, 95% CI = 5.95–21.51). These associations were supported by path analysis.ConclusionsDKD severity, abnormal estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and urinary albumin/creatinine ratio (UACR) were associated with increased risk of DR in patients with T2DM, and anemia had joint effect on these associations. Improving Hb level may decrease the risk of DR in patients with T2DM.     

Proliferative diabetic retinopathy in long-term diabetic patients with and without clinical osteoarthritis

Objective

To determine whether some long-term diabetic patients with coexisting clinical osteoarthritis (OA) are less likely to develop diabetic retinopathy (DR) than other diabetic patients and whether there is a relation between the timing of the clinical OA onset and DR.

Design, setting, and participants

Retrospective case–control study of 85 osteoarthritic patients with 20 years or more diabetes (A/DM) control group and of 85 non-osteoarthritic diabetic patients (NoA/DM) matched for age, race, duration, and type of diabetes. Digital fundus photographs were graded for retinopathy in masked manner.

Results

Glycosylated hemoglobin, hypertension, and smoking showed no significant difference. Twelve out of 85 patients (12.9%) in A/DM group developed proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) whereas 79/85 (92.9%) NoA/DM patients developed PDR (P<0.001). The onset of OA symptoms was known in 80/85 of the A/D patients, including 47 patients with onset before or at the same year as DM and 33 patients with relative onset after the year of DM. All the 10 patients with PDR (10/33) developed OA subsequent to their initiation for diabetic treatment while 0/47 A/DM patients with the onset of osteoarthritic symptoms present before or the same year as their onset of diabetes developed PDR (P<0.001).

Conclusion

Our study suggests that in long-term DM, PDR was significantly associated with the absence of concomitant clinical OA. This observation was highly significant if the onset of the arthritis was the same year or before the onset of the diabetes.     

Etiological spectrum of irreversible blindness in Kashmir in North India

Purpose:To determine the etiological spectrum of irreversible blindness in Kashmir Valley in India.Methods:Patients presenting to a tertiary care hospital in Kashmir, India, with unilateral or bilateral blindness from April 2019 to March 2020 were included in this cross-sectional study. Blindness was defined using the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. All subjects had a complete ophthalmologic examination and information was gathered regarding their demographic profile, nature of ocular disorder whether primary or secondary and laterality, if the ocular involvement was unilateral.Results:248 patients were enrolled in the study. The mean age of the patients was 57.17 years. The male: female ratio was 2.17:1. The commonest cause of unilateral or bilateral blindness was glaucoma (22.58%) followed by diabetic retinopathy (DR) (17.74%). Unilateral blindness was seen in 78.62% of the patients. Unilateral blindness occurred mainly due to glaucoma (16.41%), DR (14.87%), age-related macular degeneration (13.33%), and trauma (pellet injury: 10.76%, non-pellet injury: 10.25%). The major causes of bilateral blindness were glaucoma (45.28%), DR (28.30%), and hereditary/congenital retinal diseases (16.98%). Socioeconomic status and educational status were significantly associated (P < 0.05 each) while age, gender, place of residence, and occupation were not significantly associated (P > 0.05 each) with the number of eyes affected by blindness.Conclusion:Glaucoma and DR are the foremost causes of irreversible blindness in Kashmir. Public health plans aimed at encouraging good health education of patients should be developed in this region. Moreover, patients should be screened effectively for glaucoma and diabetes at the level of primary health care facilities.     

直接检眼镜在社区糖尿病视网膜病变筛查中的临床意义

目的:探讨直接检眼镜在社区糖尿病视网膜病变(diabetic retinopathy,DR)筛查中的临床价值.方法:将社区糖尿病患者265例快速散瞳后,使用直接检眼镜进行眼底检查,DR阳性者转诊上级医院进行荧光眼底血管造影(fluorescence fundus angiography,FFA)检查.结果:糖尿病患者265例中,DR患者79例,阳性率为29.8％,其中非增生型(non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy,NPDR)患者46例,增生型(proliferative diabetic retinopathy,PDR)患者33例,阳性率分别17.4％和12.5％.DR阳性患者转诊后均经FFA确诊,其中,3例NPDR确诊为PDR,22例DR患者接受了激光治疗.结论:使用直接检眼镜对社区糖尿病患者进行常规检查,可以提高DR早期发现率,在社区医生中普及检眼镜检查技术非常必要.     

Diabetic care initiatives to prevent blindness from diabetic retinopathy in India

It is estimated that 65 million (17%) of 382 million persons with diabetes mellitus (DM) globally reside in India. While globally 35% persons with DM have diabetic retinopathy (DR), this proportion is reportedly lower in India, other countries in South Asia and China. We reviewed published data from 2008 onwards from PubMed, which ascertained DR in population-based representative samples. We also reviewed the risk factors for DR, on awareness regarding eye complications and on accessing an eye examination. Thirteen research studies have reported on the prevalence of DR among persons with DM; this prevalence was lower than the global level in China, India, and Nepal. Eleven studies reported DR risk factors association. The duration of diabetes and level of glycemic control were universally acknowledged DR risk factors. We identified 7 studies in the Asia region that researched the level of awareness about diabetes eye complications and the practice of accessing an eye examination. Excepting 1 study in China, others reported a significant proportion being aware that diabetes leads to eye complications. But the awareness was not translated into a positive practice-most studies reported only 20–50% of the persons with diabetes actually having had their eyes examined. The present review highlights the observation that the risk factors for DR need an integrated diabetic care pathway where the eye care team has to work in close collaboration and partnership with a diabetic care team has to reduce the risk of blindness from DR.