Profile of sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy and its awareness among patients with diabetes mellitus attending a tertiary care center in Kashmir,India

Purpose:To study the profile of sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy (STDR), its association with various factors affecting it, and awareness of diabetic retinopathy (DR) among patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) attending a tertiary care center in Kashmir.Methods:In this prospective cross-sectional study, 625 consecutive patients with DM were assessed for STDR. Demographic/clinical data were obtained. Early treatment diabetic retinopathy study (ETDRS) criteria were used to grade fundus photographs. Severe nonproliferative DR, proliferative DR, and/or macular edema were classified as STDR. Optical coherence tomography was used to confirm the diagnosis of macular edema.Results:The mean age of patients was 56.36 ± 9.29 years. The male-to-female ratio was 0.92:1. The majority (99.36%) of patients had type 2 DM. STDR was seen in 208 (33.28%) patients. Non-sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy (NSTDR) was seen in 173 (27.68%) patients. Eye care was sought by 313 (50.08%) patients for the first time. STDR had a significant association with difficulty in accessing the health care facilities, duration of diabetes, uncontrolled diabetes, presence of other diabetes complications, use of insulin, and hypertension (P < 0.05 for all). Awareness that diabetes can affect eyes showed a significant association with age, gender, educational status, duration of diabetes, glycemic status, DR, and STDR (P < 0.001 for all).Conclusion:STDR is a common complication in diabetes and is duration- and glycemic control-dependent. Understanding the factors associated with STDR can help in making strategies for its prevention. Spreading awareness regarding STDR at the community level in the Kashmir valley is crucial in this regard.     

Clinical profile and magnitude of diabetic retinopathy: An electronic medical record–driven big data analytics from an eye care network in India

Purpose:This study aimed to describe the clinical profile and magnitude of diabetic retinopathy (DR) in patients presenting to a multitier eye hospital network in India.Methods:This cross-sectional hospital-based study included 263,419 individuals with diabetes mellitus (DM) presenting between February 2012 and February 2021 (9-year period). The data were collected using an electronic medical record (EMR). Patients with a clinical diagnosis of DR in at least one eye were included in the analysis. Severe nonproliferative DR/proliferative DR/diabetic macular edema (DME) were considered sight-threatening DR (STDR).Results:In the study period, 25% (n = 66,913) were new patients diagnosed with DR. The majority of patients were males (70%). The mean age of the patients was 57 ± 10 years. The risk factors for DR were increased age: 30 to 50 years (odds ratio [OR] = 2.42), and 51 to 70 years (OR = 3.02), increased duration of DM: 6 to 10 years (OR = 2.88) and >10 years (OR = 6.52), blindness (OR = 2.42), male gender (OR = 1.36), lower socioeconomic status (OR = 1.43), and rural habitation (OR = 1.09). STDR was seen in 58% (n = 38,538) of examined patients. Risk factors for STDR were increased age 31 to 50 years (OR = 3.51), increased duration of DM: 6 to 10 years (OR = 1.23) and >10 years (OR = 1.68), blindness (OR = 3.68), male gender (OR = 1.12), and higher socioeconomic status (OR = 1.09).Conclusion:Every fourth person with DM was found to have DR, and every second person with DR had STDR in this study cohort. These real-world big data might provide greater insight into the current status of DR. Additional big data from similar EMR-based sources will help in planning and resource allocation.     

Severity of diabetic retinopathy and its relationship with age at onset of diabetes mellitus in India: A multicentric study

Purpose:To present clinical profile and risk factors of sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy (STDR) among people with age of onset of diabetes (AOD) <25 versus ≥25 years.Methods:A retrospective chart analysis of consecutive patients with diabetic retinopathy (DR) n = 654) treated at 14 eye care centers across India between 2018 and 2019 was performed. Patients were divided into two groups, Group 1: AOD <25 years and Group 2: AOD ≥25 years. DR and diabetic macular edema (DME) were classified using the International Clinical Classification of DR severity scale. STDR included severe nonproliferative DR (NPDR), proliferative DR (PDR), and moderate to severe DME. A multilevel mixed-effects model was used for comparison between two groups: 1) Patients with DR and AOD <25 years and 2) Patients with DR and AOD ≥25 years. Bivariate and multivariate regression analyses were used to evaluate risk factors between the two groups.Results:A total of 654 patients were included, 161 (307 eyes) in AOD <25 and 493 (927 eyes) in AOD >25 group. There was a higher prevalence of PDR with high-risk characteristics in AOD <25 group (24% vs. 12%) at baseline and 12-month follow-up (25% vs. 6%); P < 0.001. Systolic hypertension and poor glycemic control were risk factors in both groups, with no difference in these modifiable risk factors between groups.Conclusion:People with youth-onset DM are likely to present with severer form of STDR despite similar modifiable risk factors. Therefore, strict control of systolic blood pressure, glycemic status, and regular screening for DR are recommended to reduce the risk of STDR irrespective of the age of onset of diabetes.     

Prevalence of diabetic retinopahty in India: Results from the National Survey 2015-19

Purpose:Diabetes mellitus (DM) and diabetic retinopathy (DR) contribute to ocular morbidity and are emerging as diseases with significant public health impact. Our aim was to assess the countrywide prevalence of DR and sight-threatening DR (STDR) among persons with diabetes and to evaluate the coverage of DR examinations among them.Methods:The present survey was planned to estimate the burden of DR in the population aged ≥50 years for assisting in the planning and prioritization of diabetic eye services. For this survey, 21 districts with a high prevalence of DM were selected among the 31 districts where the national blindness and visual impairment survey was conducted. The total sample size was 63,000 people aged 50 years and above. DR was assessed by dilated fundus examination with indirect ophthalmoscope and was graded according to Scottish DR grading. STDR included severe nonproliferative DR, proliferative DR, and clinically significant macular edema.Results:The prevalence of diabetes in the surveyed population was 11.8%. Among them, one-third were newly diagnosed DM, that is, diagnosed at the time of the survey. The study revealed that the prevalence of DR among persons with diabetes was 16.9%, the prevalence of STDR was 3.6%, and the prevalence of mild retinopathy was 11.8%. Risk factors for DR in the current study were duration of diabetes (>10 years, OR 4.8, 95% CI: 3.3–6.9), poor glycemic control (≥200 mg/dL, OR: 1.5, 95% CI: 1.2–1.7) and insulin treatment (OR: 2.6, 95% CI: 1.7–4.1).Conclusion:The current study highlights the substantial burden of DM and DR in India and the critical need to adopt a coordinated and multisectoral approach to reduce their prevalence. There is a need for early identification of persons with diabetes and their routine screening for DR along with availability of treatment facilities.     

Factors protecting against diabetic retinopathy in a geriatric Indian cohort

Purpose:Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a potentially sight-threatening complication of diabetes mellitus. The majority of cases are in older adults. This study aims to evaluate modifiable and nonmodifiable protective factors against DR in a geriatric Indian population.Methods:This retrospective observational study uses data from a multitiered ophthalmology network to evaluate several demographic and clinical variables against diabetic retinopathy and visual acuity.Results:Our data show that high myopia, the female sex, and no cataract surgery are associated with lower prevalence of DR (OR = 0.21, 0.65, and 0.76, respectively; P < 0.001). We also found that among those with DR, people categorized as payers, retirees, and those living in urban or metropolitan areas have better visual acuity (OR = 0.65, 0.65, 0.83, and 0.73, respectively; P < 0.001). Among those with DR, females, presence of cataracts, and no cataract surgery had lower associations with sight-threatening DR (STDR) (OR = 0.68, 0.37, and 0.76, respectively; P < 0.001). Prevalence of DR decreased in older age groups while controlling for DM duration.Conclusion:It is probable that high myopia, the female sex, and better glycemic control are protective against DR and STDR in our study cohort of adults over 60 years of age. It is possible that occupations involving manual labor, delayed cataract surgery, and living past the age of 70 are also protective against DR.     

The All India Ophthalmological Society - Academic and Research Committee pan-India diabetic retinopathy project “Fixing the missing link”: Prevalence data from West Bengal

Purpose:The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of diabetic retinopathy (DR) and its risk factors among diabetic patients in rural and urban West Bengal (WB).Methods:Patients were screened in the physician''s clinic by a team of ophthalmologist, optometrist and counsellor. Demographic details, diabetic control, compliance to eye checkup, awareness regarding diabetic blindness, and visual acuity were recorded using a questionnaire. DR was graded both by indirect ophthalmoscopy and fundus photo taken with a portable fundus camera.Results:A total of 1553 subjects were screened over 39 camps across 14 districts of WB over 17 months. The prevalence of DR was 21.51%, with a significant difference between rural (26.55%) and urban (13.89%) areas (P < 0.01). No significant difference with gender was seen (P = 0.99). Presence and grade of DR were related to age, loss of vision, diabetic age, diabetic control, awareness of diabetic blindness and last eye checkup.Conclusion:This study provides the first major prevalence data from WB, and gives valuable insight regarding modifiable risk factors for DR. It is also the first DR study in India to be conducted in the physician''s clinic. The study results emphasise the need to “fix the missing link” between ophthalmologists and treating physicians to win the battle against DR.     

Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in self-reported diabetics among various ethnic groups and associated risk factors in North-East India: A hospital-based study

Purpose:To describe the prevalence and severity of diabetic retinopathy (DR) among different ethnic groups of North-East India and to study the associated risk factors.Methods:In this hospital based cross sectional study 7,133 individuals among the age group of 20-79 years, attending the OPD, were screened for presence of Diabetes Mellitus (DM) (HbA1c >7% or previously diagnosed). Among them, 780 (10.94%) had diabetes; they were evaluated for presence of any retinopathy (based on fundus photograph and fluorescein angiography), its grade (based on International DR severity scale), and risk factors. DR patients were further grouped into different ethnicities (Assamese, Bengali, minor tribes, and other immigrants).Results:Of the 780 patients with diabetes, 58 patients had type 1 DM and 722 patients had type 2 DM. The overall prevalence of DR was 30.0% with vision-threatening retinopathy and maculopathy being 10.00% and 4.49%, respectively. The prevalence of retinopathy range was the highest in the immigrants’ group (50.00% among type 1 DM and 44.93% among type 2 DM) and lowest in the tribal''s groups (16.67% among type 1 DM and 22.35% among type 2 DM). The risk factors showing significant association with DR were longer diabetes duration, older age, family history of diabetes, higher HbA1c level, associated hypertension, hypertriglyceridemia, and pregnancy state (P value <0.05).Conclusion:Every third patient with diabetes had some form of DR with Vision Threatening DR (VTDR) affecting every tenth patient. There was also a wide variation in the prevalence of DR among ethnic groups and this difference could not be attributed to variation in the known measurable risk factors among different ethnic groups, thus signifying the role of ethnicity in occurrence and severity of DR.     

Foveal slope measurements in diabetic retinopathy: Can it predict development of sight-threatening retinopathy? Sankara Nethralaya Diabetic Retinopathy Epidemiology and Molecular Genetics Study (SN-DREAMS II,Report no 8)

Aim:

The aim was to assess the foveal slope configuration in subjects with type 2 diabetes in a population-based study.

Materials and Methods:

A subset of 668 subjects from Sankara Nethralaya Diabetic Retinopathy (DR) Epidemiology and Molecular Genetics Study II, a population-based study, were included in the current study. All the subjects underwent comprehensive ophthalmic evaluation including spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Foveal thickness was assessed in five central early treatment DR study quadrants from the three-dimensional scan and foveal slope was calculated in all the four quadrants.

Results:

Subjects with sight-threatening DR (STDR) had significantly shallow foveal slope in inferior quadrant (STDR: 7.33 ± 6.26 vs. controls: 10.31 ± 3.44; P = 0.021) when compared to controls and in superior (STDR: 7.62 ± 5.81 vs. no DR: 9.11 ± 2.82; P = 0.033), inferior (STDR: 7.33 ± 6.26 vs. no DR: 8.81 ± 2.81; P = 0.048), and temporal quadrants (STDR: 6.69 ± 5.70 vs. no DR: 7.97 ± 2.33; P = 0.030) when compared to subjects with no DR. Foveal slope was significantly shallow among the older age groups in subjects with no DR (P < 0.001) and non-STDR (P = 0.027). Average foveal slope in the diabetic subjects was independently and significantly correlated with increase in age (r = −0.241; P < 0.001) and central subfield thickness (r = −0.542; P < 0.001).

Conclusion:

Changes in foveal slope were seen with increasing age; however, in diabetes these segmental slope changes can be seen in late DR (STDR).     

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) among 40 years and older Saudi population with diabetes in Riyadh governorate,Saudi Arabia – A population based survey

PurposeTo present the prevalence and determinants of diabetic retinopathy (DR) among more than 40 years old Saudi population.MethodsA population based survey was conducted in Riyadh district between 2014 and 2017. All Saudi aged >40 years suffering from diabetes and confirmed in the diabetes register of the Primary Health Center (PHC) were the study population. Representative sample was examined. The Best corrected Visual acuity (BCVA), anterior and posterior segment assessment was performed. Digital fundus camera captured the retinal images. DR was graded into No DR, Non-proliferative DR (Mild, Moderate, Severe) and proliferative DR (PDR). Diabetic macular edema (DME) was separately noted. Sight Threatening Diabetic Retinopathy (STDR) included PDR and/or DME.ResultsWe examined 890 persons. The age sex adjusted prevalence of DR was 44.7% (95% CI 44.1 – 45.3). The DR among male was significantly higher than in females. [RR = 1.4 (95% CI 1.02 – 1.8)]. The DR in 60 plus population was higher compared to 40 to 60 years old diabetics [RR = 1.64 (95% CI 1.6 – 1.7), P < 0.001]. The crude prevalence of STDR was 12.4% (95% CI 9.1 – 15.7). Among diabetic with DR, bilateral and unilateral Severe Visual Impairment (SVI) rate were 1% and 1.8%. The coverage of retinal laser treatment for STDR was 6.1%.ConclusionsThe DR among diabetics is high among adult Saudi population. Both DR and STDR were more in males. Visual disabilities among DR cases were few. For early detection and timely management the services need urgent attention.     

Failure to initiate early insulin therapy – A risk factor for diabetic retinopathy in insulin users with Type 2 diabetes mellitus: Sankara Nethralaya-Diabetic Retinopathy Epidemiology and Molecular Genetics Study (SN-DREAMS,Report number 35)

Context:Insulin users have been reported to have a higher incidence of diabetic retinopathy (DR).Aim:The aim was to elucidate the factors associated with DR among insulin users, especially association between duration, prior to initiating insulin for Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) and developing DR.Results:Insulin users had more incidence of DR (52.9% vs. 16.3%, P < 0.0001) and sight threatening DR (19.1% vs. 2.4%, P < 0.0001) in comparison to insulin nonusers. Among insulin users, longer duration of DM (odds ratio [OR] 1.12, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.00–1.25, P = 0.044) and abdominal obesity (OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.02–1.29, P = 0.021) was associated with DR. The presence of DR was significantly associated with longer duration (≥5 years) prior to initiating insulin therapy, overall (38.0% vs. 62.0%, P = 0.013), and in subjects with suboptimal glycemic control (32.5% vs. 67.5%, P = 0.022).Conclusions:The presence of DR is significantly associated with longer duration of diabetes (>5 years) and sub-optimal glycemic control (glycosylated hemoglobin <7.0%). Among insulin users, abdominal obesity was found to be a significant predictor of DR; DR is associated with longer duration prior to initiating insulin therapy in Type 2 DM subjects with suboptimal glycemic control.     

Aqueous Humor Biomarkers of Retinal Glial Cell Activation in Patients With or Without Age-Related Cataracts and With Different Stages of Diabetic Retinopathy

PurposeTo clarify the expression of biomarkers of retinal glial cell activation in the aqueous humor (AH) of patients with and without age-related cataracts (ARCs) at different stages of diabetic retinopathy (DR).MethodsPatients were stratified by the presence of ARCs and then grouped by the presence of diabetes mellitus (DM), nonproliferative DR (NPDR), proliferative DR (PDR), and controls. Water channel aquaporin 1 (AQP1), water channel aquaporin 4 (AQP4), inwardly rectifying potassium channel 4.1 (Kir4.1), and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) were assayed in AH samples by ELISAs.ResultsWe enrolled 82 patients. The AQP1 concentration was higher in AH from cataract control patients than in control patients without cataracts (P < 0.05). The APQ1 concentration was also higher in patients with DM, NPDR, and PDR than in controls (P < 0.05). The concentrations of AQP4 and GFAP were significantly increased in patients with NPDR and PDR (P < 0.05) but not in patients with DM. Kir4.1 concentration was significantly decreased in patients with NPDR and PDR (P < 0.05), but the decrease in patients with DM did not reach significance. There were no differences in AQP4, Kir4.1, and GFAP between patients with and without ARCs.ConclusionsIncreased AQP1 in AH may be a biomarker for ARCs in patients without diabetes and a biomarker for retinal glial cell activation in patients with diabetes without cataracts. AQP4, Kir4.1, and GFAP levels in AH suggested that retinal glial cell activation was affected by the progression of DR.     

Knowledge and awareness about diabetes mellitus and diabetic retinopathy in suburban population of a South Indian state and its practice among the patients with diabetes mellitus: A population-based study

Context:Ocular complications due to diabetes mellitus (DM) were on the rise despite good literacy levels in South India.Aims:To assess the knowledge and attitude toward DM and diabetic retinopathy of the general population in a suburban town of South India.Results:In this study, 6211 people (3528 [56.8%] women and 2683 [43.2%] men) with a mean age of 55.6 ± 11.7 years (range 21-98 years) were included. Good knowledge and positive attitude were observed in 3457 (55.6%) and 3280 (52.8%) people. Among 1538 (25.4%) people known to have DM, only 619 (40.7%) had good knowledge, 828 (53.8%) had a positive attitude, and 886 (57.6%) had good practice patterns. Although half of them followed general diabetic care, only 9.6% had undergone screening for retinopathy. Literacy showed a significant association with good KAP (P < 0.001 each) in general population and those with DM. Overall, women had significantly better knowledge (P < 0.001).Conclusions:Better literacy, especially among women, is contributory to better public awareness; however, the trend for poor practice patterns needs to be radically changed with aggressive public motivation emphasizing on the necessity of retinopathy screening and periodic follow-ups.     

Prevalence and Associated Factors of Diabetic Retinopathy among Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients in Brunei Darussalam: A Cross-sectional Study

PurposeTo determine the prevalence of diabetic retinopathy (DR) and the factors associated with retinopathy among type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) patients in Brunei Darussalam.MethodsCross-sectional study of all type 2 DM patients who attended diabetic eye screening over a 3-month period at one of four government hospitals. We assessed association between DR with the following variables: age, sex, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), duration of DM, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and microalbuminuria.ResultsThere were 341 patients (female, 58.9%; mean age, 55.3 ± 11.9 years) with a mean duration of DM of 9.4 ± 7.4 years and mean serum HbA1c of 8.4% ± 1.9%. The overall prevalence of any DR was 22.6% (95% confidence interval, 18.8–27.1) with prevalence rates of 4.1% (95% confidence interval, 2.1–6.4) for proliferative DR and 9.7% (95% confidence interval, 6.8–13.2) for vision-threatening DR. Multivariate analysis showed that DR was significantly associated with certain age groups (reduced in older age groups), longer duration of DM (11 years or more), poor control (HbA1c >9.0%) and presence of any microalbuminuria.ConclusionsDR affects one in five patients with DM in Brunei Darussalam, comparable to rates reported for other Asian populations. It is especially worrying that one in ten patients with DM had vision-threatening DR. DR was significantly associated with longer duration of DM, poor control and presence of microalbuminuria but reduced in older age groups. It is important to advocate good control right from the time of diagnosis of DM and institute timely and effective management of retinopathy. DR was significantly associated with longer duration of DM, poor control of diabetes, and presence of microalbuminuria but reduced in older age groups.     

Screening for obstructive sleep apnea in a diabetic retinopathy clinic in a tertiary care center

Purpose:To screen for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in patients presenting to diabetic retinopathy (DR) clinic and to correlate its presence with the severity of DR.Methods:A prospective, cross-sectional study of diabetes mellitus patients in retina clinic of a tertiary care referral center, North India (January 2019–March 2020). All were subjected to STOP-Bang Questionnaire and Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) score. Patients at high OSA risk (STOP-Bang score ≥5 and ESS score ≥10) were referred to Department of Otorhinolaryngology (sleep clinic) for polysomnography. Based on Apnea Hypopnea Index (AHI), OSA was graded as mild (AHI = 5–14/h), moderate (AHI = 15–30/h), and severe (AHI >30/h). Statistical analysis was done using three models of outcome measures: (1) “No DR” versus “any DR,” (2) “Less severe DR” versus “More severe DR,” and (3) “No diabetic macular edema (DME)” versus “DME.”Results:Of 362 patients screened, 18 (4.97%) had OSA (11 mild, 5 moderate, and 2 severe). Though OSA did not show a significant association with various outcome measures, patients with moderate–severe OSA had higher odds in developing “any DR” (OR = 7.408; 95% CI = 0.533–102.898), “more severe DR” (OR = 1.961; 95% CI = 0.153–25.215), and “DME” (OR = 2.263; 95% CI = 0.357–14.355), on multiple logistic regression.Conclusion:Ours is the first screening study of OSA in DR patients in India, the diabetes capital of the world. We detected OSA in 4.97% of patients in a DR clinic, with an increased risk of “any DR,” “more severe DR,” and “DME” in the presence of moderate–severe OSA.     

Does myopia decrease the risk of diabetic retinopathy in both type-1 and type-2 diabetes mellitus?

Purpose:To study the relationship between the severity of myopia and the severity of diabetic retinopathy (DR) in individuals with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM).Methods:This retrospective study was conducted using data from electronic medical records from a multicentric eyecare network located in various geographic regions of India. Individuals with type 1 or type 2 DM were classified according to their refractive status. Severe nonproliferative DR (NPDR), PDR, or presence of clinically significant macular edema (CSME) with any type of DR was considered as vision-threatening diabetic retinopathy (VTDR).Results:A total of 472 individuals with type-1 DM (mean age 41 ± 10 years) and 9341 individuals with type-2 DM (52 ± 9 years) were enrolled. Individuals with a hyperopic refractive error had a significant positive association with the diagnosis of VTDR (odds ratio (OR) 1.26; 95%CI 1.04–1.51, P = 0.01) and moderate nonproliferative DR (OR 1.27; 95%CI 1.02–1.59, P = 0.03) in type-2 DM; however, no significant association was found in type-1 DM. After adjusting for age, gender, anisometropia, and duration of diabetes, the presence of high myopia (< - 6 D) reduced the risk of VTDR in type 2 DM (OR 0.18; 95% CI 0.04–0.77, P = 0.02), but no association was found in type 1 DM. Mild and moderate myopia had no significant association with any forms of DR in both type-1 and type-2 DM.Conclusion:Hyperopic refractive error was found to increase the risk of VTDR in persons with type 2 DM. High-myopic refractive error is protective for VTDR in type 2 DM, but not in type-1 DM.     

Diabetes onset at an earlier age and high HbA1c levels as risk factors of diabetic retinopathy

AIM:To assess the effect of age at diabetes onset and uncontrollable high Hb A1 c levels on the development of diabetic retinopathy(DR)among Chinese type 2 diabetes mellitus(DM)patients.METHODS:This was a cross-sectional survey of diabetic patients in Subei district,China.Data covering physical measurements,fasting blood-glucose(FBG),glycosylated hemoglobin(Hb A1 c),blood lipid,urinary albumin/creatinine ratio(UACR),ocular fundus examination,and diabetes treatment records were collected.An independent sample t-test were used to analyze differences.A Logistic regression analysis was applied to study the independent risk factors of DR.RESULTS:A total of 1282 patients with type 2 DM were enrolled,and 191 cases had DR(14.9%).The age at diabetes onset,education level,alcohol consumption,Hb A1 c level,UACR level,and hypoglycemic drugs were independent influencing factors for DR.The older the onset of diabetes,the less likely to develop DR(OR:0.958,95%CI:0.942-0.975,P=0.000).Patients were then divided in terms of age at diabetes onset as follows:<50 y,50-59 y,60-69 y,and≥70 y.Compared with diabetes onset age<50 y,50-59 y(OR:0.463,95%CI:0.306-0.699,P=0.000),60-69 y(OR:0.329,95%CI:0.203-0.535,P=0.000)and≥70 y(OR:0.232,95%CI:0.094-0.577,P=0.002)were at a lower risk of DR.The prevalence of DR was highest in patients with diabetes onset age<50 y(29.5%,P<0.05).The Hb A1 c level(8.67±1.97)%and proportion of insulin injection(52.5%)in patients with diabetes onset<40 y were higher than in patients with older diabetes onset age(P<0.05).CONCLUSION:Diabetes onset at an earlier age and uncontrollable high Hb A1 c level could be independent risk factors for DR.     

Assessment of retinal neurodegeneration with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography: a systematic review and meta-analysis

ObjectivesTo comprehensively assess diabetic retinopathy neurodegeneration (DRN) as quantified by retinal neuronal and axonal layers measured with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) in subjects with diabetes mellitus (DM).MethodsArticles on the topic of examining macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (m-GCIPL), macular retinal nerve fibre layer (m-RNFL), macular ganglion cell complex (m-GCC), and peripapillary RNFL (p-RNFL) measured with SD-OCT in DM subjects without DR (NDR) or with non-proliferative DR (NPDR) were searched in PubMed and Embase up to November 31, 2019. Standardized mean difference (SMD) as effect size were pooled using random-effects model.ResultsThirty-six studies searched from online databases and the CUHK DM cohort were included in the meta-analysis. In the comparison between NDR and control, macular measures including mean m-GCIPL (SMD = −0.26, p = 0.003), m-RNFL (SMD = −0.26, p = 0.046), and m-GCC (SMD = −0.28; p = 0.009) were significantly thinner in the NDR group. In the comparison between NPDR and NDR, only mean p-RNFL was significantly thinner in the NPDR group (SMD = −0.27; p = 0.03), but not other macular measures.ConclusionsThinning of retinal neuronal and axonal layers at macula as measured by SD-OCT are presented in eyes with NDR, supporting DRN may be the early pathogenesis in the DM patients without the presence of clinical signs of DR. In the future, these SD-OCT measures may be used as surrogates of DRN to stratify DM patients with a high risk of DR, and may be used as a therapeutic target if neuroprotection treatment for DR is available.Subject terms: Retinal diseases, Eye abnormalities     

Relationship between diabetic retinopathy and diabetic peripheral neuropathy - Neurodegenerative and microvascular changes

Purpose:To determine the relationship between diabetic retinopathy (DR) and diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN), and their associated risk factors.Methods:We conducted a cross-sectional analysis on 500 patients who attended the Endocrinology department at a quaternary health care center in Kerala between November 2017 and April 2018. Patients above the age of 30 years with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) were included. They underwent a detailed medical history, dilated fundus examination for DR, assessment and grading of DPN, and blood investigations. Among these, 49 randomly selected patients without DR had peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and ganglion cell inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) assessed by optical coherence tomogram. RNFL and GCIPL changes in different grades of neuropathy were evaluated.Results:Out of 500 patients, 303 (60.6%) were males and 197 (39.4%) were females. Prevalence of DR was 48% and DPN 71.8%. Risk factors for the development of DR included duration of DM >15 years, HbA1c (glycated hemoglobin) greater than 6.5%, serum creatinine more than 1.5 mg/dl, and the presence of DPN. There was a statistically significant association between DR and DPN. There was significant thinning of GCIPL in patients with moderate to severe neuropathy without DR.Conclusion:There is a significant association between DR and DPN and their severities. There are early changes in inner retinal layers of diabetic patients without microvascular changes of DR. These neurodegenerative changes parallel DPN in the course of DM. Our study stresses the importance of multidisciplinary approach in the management of diabetes and its complications.     

Incidence and Progression of Diabetic Retinopathy in Urban India: Sankara Nethralaya-Diabetic Retinopathy Epidemiology and Molecular Genetics Study (SN-DREAMS II), Report 1

Purpose: To evaluate the 4-year incidence and progression of and risk factors for diabetic retinopathy (DR) in an Indian population.

Methods: From a cross-sectional study of 1425 subjects with diabetes, 911 (63.9%) returned for 4-year follow-up. After excluding 21 with ungradable retinal images, data from 890 subjects were analyzed. Participants underwent examinations based on a standard protocol, which included grading of retinal photographs.

Results: The incidences of DR, diabetic macular edema (DME), and sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy (STDR) were 9.2%, 2.6%, and 5.0%, respectively. In subjects with DR at baseline, the incidence of DME and STDR had increased (11.5% and 22.7%, respectively). 1-step and 2-step progressions of DR were seen in 30.2% and 12.6% of participants, respectively, and 1-step and 2-step regressions were seen in 12.0% and 1.8%, respectively. Incident DR, DME, and STDR were associated with higher systolic blood pressure (odds ratio, OR, 1.21, 2.11 and 1.72, respectively, for every 10 mmHg increase). Incident DR and DME were associated with increasing duration of diabetes (OR 2.29 and 4.77, respectively, for every 10-year increase) and presence of anemia (OR 1.96 and 10.14, respectively). Incident DR was also associated with higher hemoglobin A1c (OR 1.16 for every 1% increase). Variables associated with 1-step progression were every 10 mg/dL increase in serum total cholesterol (OR 15.65) as a risk factor, and 10 mg/dL increase in serum triglyceride (OR 0.52) as a protective factor.

Conclusions: The incidences of STDR and DME were higher in people with pre-existing DR than in those without DR at baseline.