Reminiscence and vivid personal memories across adulthood

This study examined reminiscence functions and vivid (i.e., landmark) personal memories in nine samples ranging from the teens to the nineties. Participants (n = 198) ranging in age from 18-95 years completed the Reminiscence Functions Scale (Webster, 1997) and described a vivid personal memory which was subsequently rated for frequency of recall, emotional valence, time of occurrence, impact, and thematic content. Reminiscence results showed that older adults tend to reminiscence more for social functions while younger adults tend to reminisce more for self functions. Older adults reported vivid memories that were less intimate and less negative although adults of all ages showed the "reminiscence bump." Significant relationships were also obtained between the content of vivid memories described and the patterns of general reminiscence behaviors.     

The Portuguese Version of the Immunosuppressant Therapy Adherence Scale (ITAS) among Liver Transplant Recipient Patients: Translation and Psychometric Properties

Introduction and aim. Transplant recipients are chronically ill patients who rely on medical treatment throughout life to achieve positive results. Despite that, medication nonadherence after liver transplantation is extremely common. The self-report, one of several methods for measuring adherence, is easy to apply and low cost. Thus, this study aims to translate and validate the Immunosuppressant Therapy Adherence Instrument (ITAS) in Brazilian Portuguese for liver transplant recipients.Material and methods. A total of 139 liver transplant recipients were selected from a general hospital, who were assessed by using the Portuguese version of ITAS. The scale was translated based on the model proposed by Wild, et al. and its psychometric properties were assessed.Results. The average Cronbach’s a coefficient was 0.830. ITAS and Basel Assessment of Adherence with Immunosuppressive Medications Scale (BAASIS) presented significant correlation, with a Spearman’s p coefficient = 0.300 (S = 309,580; p < 0.001). The area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve was 0.638 (95% CI: 0.557 – 0.715). Factor analysis results indicated that the carelessness factor model was the optimal model, and the factor “feeling worse” was the lowest.Conclusion. The Portuguese version of ITAS has adequate psychometric properties to measure adherence to immunosuppressant therapy.     

Validation of a Brazilian Portuguese Version of the Walking Estimated-Limitation Calculated by History (WELCH)

Background

The Walking Estimated-Limitation Calculated by History (WELCH) questionnaire has been proposed to evaluate walking impairment in patients with intermittent claudication (IC), presenting satisfactory psychometric properties. However, a Brazilian Portuguese version of the questionnaire is unavailable, limiting its application in Brazilian patients.

Objective

To analyze the psychometric properties of a translated Brazilian Portuguese version of the WELCH in Brazilian patients with IC.

Methods

Eighty-four patients with IC participated in the study. After translation and back-translation, carried out by two independent translators, the concurrent validity of the WELCH was analyzed by correlating the questionnaire scores with the walking capacity assessed with the Gardner treadmill test. To determine the reliability of the WELCH, internal consistency and test-retest reliability with a seven-day interval between the two questionnaire applications were calculated.

Results

There were significant correlations between the WELCH score and the claudication onset distance (r = 0.64, p = 0.01) and total walking distance (r = 0.61, p = 0.01). The internal consistency was 0.84 and the intraclass correlation coefficient between questionnaire evaluations was 0.84. There were no differences in WELCH scores between the two questionnaire applications.

Conclusion

The Brazilian Portuguese version of the WELCH presents adequate validity and reliability indicators, which support its application to Brazilian patients with IC.     

Quality of life assessment in HIV-infection: validation of the European Portuguese version of WHOQOL-HIV

The assessment of quality of life (QOL) in HIV infection has emerged as being vital to research and clinical practice. This assessment is also a challenge due to the specific characteristics of the infection, the increased availability of therapeutics, as well as the epidemiological variability inherent to HIV infection. The purpose of this study was to investigate the psychometric properties of the European Portuguese version of the World Health Organization's QOL Instrument in HIV Infection (WHOQOL-HIV) and to test its performance in a sample of HIV-infected patients. The European Portuguese version of WHOQOL-HIV was administered in a sample of 200 HIV-positive patients. The patients also completed the Portuguese versions of Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI). The WHOQOL-HIV showed quite an acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's α ranged from 0.86 to 0.95 across domains). Convergent validity with BDI and BSI was satisfactory for all domains (all r>0.50; p<0.001). Moreover, correlations between domains and between domains and overall QOL were all statistically significant (p<0.001). The reliability and validity studies of the European Portuguese version of the WHOQOL-HIV revealed good psychometric characteristics, which allows for the use of this version of WHOQOL in our country, and cross-cultural comparability.     

Measuring the character strength of wisdom

This study examined the psychosocial correlates and psychometric properties of the Self-Assessed Wisdom Scale (SAWS). Seventy-three men and 98 women ranging in age from 17-92 years (Mean age = 42.77) completed an expanded, 40-item version of the SAWS, the Loyola Generativity Scale, and the Experiences in Close Relationships Scale. A new definition of wisdom is provided which is operationalized with the SAWS. Results indicated that the SAWS has excellent reliability (test-retest = .838; Cronbach's Alpha = .904). Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor analyses confirmed the five hypothesized dimensions of wisdom and the total SAWS score correlated in predicted directions with generativity (r(169) = .448; p < .01) and attachment avoidance (r(169) = -.239, p < .01) demonstrating construct validity.     

A cross-sectional validation study of the Swedish version of SWAL-QOL

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Swedish version of the Swallowing Quality of Life questionnaire (SWAL-QOL). The study design was cross-sectional and the study was performed in patients with subjective oropharyngeal dysphagia due to head and neck (H&N) cancer (n?=?85) or neurological disease (n?=?30) and in a sample of age- and gender-matched controls (mean age?=?63?years, 57% males) without subjective dysphagia (n?=?115). The Short-Form 36 (SF-36) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) questionnaires were used for assessment of convergent and discriminant validity. The Swedish version of SWAL-QOL was well accepted, the response rate was high (>90%), and the number of missing items were very low (<1%). Overall, the questionnaire showed good to excellent psychometric properties, including floor and ceiling effects (range?=?0-16 and 0-21%), internal consistency [Cronbach's α?>?0.70 for all domains except Eating Duration (0.69) and Sleep (0.68)], test-retest reliability (intraclass correlations?=?0.75-0.98) and convergent and discriminant validity as assessed by correlations between SWAL-QOL and SF-36 and HADS. SWAL-QOL also proved able to differentiate between dysphagic and nondysphagic patients (P?相似文献   

Duke Activity Status Index for Cardiovascular Diseases: Validation of the Portuguese Translation

Background

The Duke Activity Status Index (DASI) assesses the functional capacity of patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD), but there is no Portuguese version validated for CVD.

Objectives

To translate and adapt cross-culturally the DASI for the Portuguese-Brazil language, and to verify its psychometric properties in the assessment of functional capacity of patients with CVD.

Methods

The DASI was translated into Portuguese, then checked by back-translation into English and evaluated by an expert committee. The pre-test version was first evaluated in 30 subjects. The psychometric properties and correlation with exercise testing was performed in a second group of 67 subjects. An exploratory factor analyses was performed in all 97 subjects to verify the construct validity of the DASI.

Results

The intraclass correlation coefficient for test-retest reliability was 0.87 and for the inter-rater reliability was 0.84. Cronbach''s α for internal consistency was 0.93. The concurrent validity was verified by significant positive correlations of DASI scores with the VO₂max (r = 0.51, p < 0.001). The factor analysis yielded two factors, which explained 54% of the total variance, with factor 1 accounting for 40% of the variance. Application of the DASI required between one and three and a half minutes per patient.

Conclusions

The Brazilian version of the DASI appears to be a valid, reliable, fast and easy to administer tool to assess functional capacity among patients with CVD.     

Validation of a Chinese version of the Medical Outcomes Study Family and Marital Functioning Measures in patients with SLE

The objective was to validate a Chinese translation of the Medical Outcomes Study Family and Marital Functioning Measures (FFM and MFM) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Chinese-speaking SLE patients (n = 69) completed a self-administered questionnaire containing the FFM and MFM and assessing demographic and socio-economic status twice within a 2 week period. SLE activity, disease-related damage and quality of life were assessed using the BILAG, SLICC/ACR Damage Index and SF-36 Health Survey, respectively. Scale psychometric properties were assessed through factor analysis, Cronbach's alpha, quantifying test-retest differences and known-groups construct validity. Factor analysis identified 1 factor corresponding to the FFM and 2 factors corresponding to the MFM. Internal consistency for the FFM was excellent (alpha = 0.92) while that for the MFM was acceptable (alpha = 0.62). Mean (s.d.) test-retest differences were 0.06 (1.54) points for the FFM and 0.03 (2.08) points for the MFM. 11 and 10 of 13 a priori hypotheses relating the FFM and MFM, respectively, to demographic, disease and quality of life variables were confirmed, supporting the construct validity of these scales. The Chinese FFM and MFM are valid and reliable measures of family and marital functioning in Chinese-speaking SLE patients, with psychometric properties very similar to the source English version.     

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of a European Portuguese version of the 8-item Morisky medication adherence scale

Introduction and Objective

The 8-Item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8) is one of the most widely used instruments to assess medication adherence, but a validated European Portuguese version of MMAS-8 does not exist. Our aim was to develop and validate a European Portuguese version of the MMAS-8.

Development and preliminary testing of a Paediatric Version of the Haemophilia Activities List (pedhal)

Summary. Worldwide, children with haemophilia suffer from limitations in performing activities of daily living. To measure such limitations in adults a disease‐specific instrument, the Haemophilia Activities List (HAL), was created in 2004. The aim of this study was to adapt the HAL for children with haemophilia and to assess its psychometric properties. The structure and the main content were derived from the HAL. Additionally, items of the Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire and the Activity Scale for Kids were considered for inclusion. This version was evaluated by health professionals (n = 6), patients (n = 4), and parents (n = 3). A pilot test in a sample of 32 Dutch children was performed to assess score distribution, construct validity (Spearman’s rho) and reproducibility. Administration of the p edhal was feasible for children from the age of 4 years onwards. The p edhal scores of the Dutch children were in the high end of the scale, reflecting a good functional status. Most subscales showed moderate associations with the joint examination (rho = 0.42–0.63) and moderate‐to‐good associations with the physical function subscale of the CHQ‐50 (rho = 0.48–0.74). No significant associations were found for the p edhal and the subscales mental health and behaviour, except for the subscales leisure and sport and mental health (rho = 0.47). Test–retest agreement was good. The p edhal is a promising tool, but further testing in populations with a higher level of disability is warranted to study the full range of its psychometric properties.     

蒙特利尔认知评估量表在健康体检人群中的应用

目的研究蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA)在健康体检人群中的分布特征。方法选择1350例健康体检者,采用北京版MoCA对受试者进行认知功能测评。最终777例进入分析,按年龄分为:<65岁组175例,65⁶9岁组200例,7069岁组200例,70⁷4岁组145例,7574岁组145例,75⁷9岁组124例,≥80岁组133例;按受教育年限分为:≤12年组153例和1379岁组124例,≥80岁组133例;按受教育年限分为:≤12年组153例和13²0年组624例。结果不同年龄组、不同受教育年限组MoCA总分比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。多元线性回归方程显示,年龄与MoCA总分呈负相关(β=-0.639,P=0.000),受教育年限与MoCA总分呈正相关(β=0.741,P=0.000)。以均数-1.5倍标准差为轻度认知障碍筛查的参考值,筛查值范围分别为:<65岁组≤25分,6520年组624例。结果不同年龄组、不同受教育年限组MoCA总分比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。多元线性回归方程显示,年龄与MoCA总分呈负相关(β=-0.639,P=0.000),受教育年限与MoCA总分呈正相关(β=0.741,P=0.000)。以均数-1.5倍标准差为轻度认知障碍筛查的参考值,筛查值范围分别为:<65岁组≤25分,65⁶9岁组≤24分,7069岁组≤24分,70⁷4岁组≤24分,7574岁组≤24分,75⁷9岁组≤23分,≥80岁组≤19分;≤12年组≤20分,1379岁组≤23分,≥80岁组≤19分;≤12年组≤20分,13²0年组≤24分。结论在健康体检人群中,用MoCA进行认知功能障碍患者的筛查界值不同,尤其在低文化程度和高龄人群更需注意。     

Cross-cultural adaptation of the caregiver contribution to heart failure self-Care into Brazilian Portuguese and content validation

BackgroundThe Caregiver Contribution to Heart Failure Self-Care (CACHS) is a Canadian instrument that assesses caregivers’ (CGs) contributions to heart failure (HF) patients’ self‐care, but a Brazilian version was lacking.AimsTo adapt CACHS into Brazilian Portuguese and to estimate the content validity of the adapted version.MethodsA psychometric study of cross-cultural adaptation and content validation was conducted. Linguistic equivalence was assessed by eight professional experts. Content validity was assessed by an expert professional panel (n=8; for clarity, theoretical relevance and practical relevance) and a CG panel (n=46; for cognitive debriefing of the adapted instrument). In the cultural adaptation, the items were considered equivalent if experts reached an agreement ≥80%. In the content validation, the items were considered acceptable if content validity coefficients (CVC) were ≥0.70.ResultsThe translated version was considered consistent with the original CACHS by the authors. In the second round of linguistic equivalence assessment, all items achieved 100% agreement, except for one item, which presented 75% agreement in conceptual equivalence. The CVC in the first and second rounds of content validity assessment by experts was 0.80 to 0.90. During cognitive testing, the CGs requested explanations on three items, which were reformulated. All CGs then understood the Brazilian version of CACHS, named CACHS – Versão Brasileira (CACHS-Br).ConclusionsCACHS-Br is equivalent to the original version and provided satisfactory evidence of content validity. Further psychometric testing of this version should allow for the measurement of the CG contributions to HF self-care in Brazil.     

Test-retest reliability of a German language multidimensional assessment instrument in elderly probands

Most geriatric assessment instruments have been developed in the English language. Translated versions might differ in their psychometric properties. We analyzed the test-retest reliability and internal consistency of a German instrument for multidimensional geriatric assessment that was based on a newly developed English version. A group of 100 over 75-year-old community-dwelling persons (mean age 83.0 years, 81% women) in Hamburg (n = 26) and Ulm (n = 51), Germany, and Berne (n = 23), Switzerland was interviewed twice by the same trained interviewers with a one week interval. We administered questions on general health, chronic disorders, basic and instrumental activities of daily living, urinary incontinence, nutrition, falls, pain, the social support/network and preventive care measures. In addition, the Functional Status Questionnaire, the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly, the Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index, the Visual Function Questionnaire, the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly and the Geriatric Depression Scale were administered. Cohen's kappa was good to excellent (0.64 < or = kappa < or = 0.89) with only three exceptions (pain questions, kappa = 0.53; questions on preventive care services, kappa = 0.51; and one of the questions on recent falls, kappa = 0.44). Cronbach alpha (internal consistency) was good to excellent for all domains (0.76 < or = alpha < or = 0.95). The study results confirm good test-retest reliability of the German version of this multidimensional geriatric assessment instrument. Adapted versions of this instrument can be used for different purposes, e.g., preventive home visits, outpatient geriatric assessments or epidemiological studies in older persons.     

Deutsche Adaptation der “Activities-Specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale„ zur Erfassung der sturzassoziierten Selbstwirksamkeit

The present study investigates the psychometric properties and the factorial structure of the German adaptation of the Activities-Specific Balance Confidence (ABC) scale (Powell & Myers, 1995) for the evaluation of falls-related self-efficacy in community-dwelling older adults. The German adaptation of the ABC using a forward-backward procedure was administered to 113 older adults (age 68.9+/-8.5 years). The following internationally accepted instruments were used for validation: The Short Form Health Survey SF 36, the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), the Trail Making Test and the Letter Number Sequencing Test, and motor tests (balance, strength, mobility). The internal consistency (0.91-0.95) as well as the test-retest reliability of the subscales was excellent (0.94-0.98). The correlation coefficients with the validation instruments ranged between 0.33 and 0.58. Significant differences in the ABC-D scores were found in older adults with and without falls. Older adults with a recent fall history scored lower on the ABC-D than older adults without a recent fall history. To conclude, the German version of the ABC has properties analogous to the original English version and is apparently useful in assessing falls-related self-efficacy.     

Quality of life of asthmatic children and adolescents: Portuguese translation,adaptation, and validation of the questionnaire “Pediatric Quality of Life (PedsQL) Asthma Module”

Objective: The objectives of the study were to translate, validate, and verify the psychometric properties of the Portuguese version of the instrument “Pediatric Quality of Life Asthma Module” (PedsQL Asthma) culturally adapted for the Brazilian culture. Methods: After being translated to Portuguese and being culturally adapted, the questionnaire was answered by 200 asthmatic children and adolescents (aged 2–18) as well as the adults responsible for them. Validation required the use of the following instruments: PedsQL Asthma Children (applied to children and adolescents), PedsQL Asthma Parents (applied to adults responsible for children and adolescents), Pediatric Asthma Quality of Life (PAQLQ), Asthma Control Test (ACT) or Childhood Asthma Control Test (C-ACT), as well as socioeconomic and personal information questionnaires. A group of 45 clinically stable children repeated the questionnaires 15–60 days after answering the first questionnaire. Results: Correlations between the scores of PedsQL Children and PedsQL Parents (r = 0.67), PedsQL Children and PAQLQ (r = 0.66), and PedsQL Parents and PAQLQ (r = 0.64) were moderate and significant. Correlations were higher for men (r = 0.72) when analyzing the children's and parents’ answers to PedsQL according to gender. The 5- to 7-year-old age group had the strongest correlations with PAQLQ (r = 0.79). Cronbach's alpha coefficient for PedsQL Children and Parents had values of 0.85 and 0.87, respectively. A high concordance was observed in both tests at different times, with kappa values of 0.89 and 0.87 for PedsQL Children and Parents, respectively. Conclusion: The instrument used in this study was considered valid, consistent, and reproducible and has acceptable psychometric properties for the Brazilian population.     

A comparison of the psychometric properties of three cigarette withdrawal scales

AIMS: To compare the psychometric properties of three cigarette withdrawal scales. DESIGN: An internet cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Each of 4,644 current (44%), former (49%) and never smokers (7%) completed the three scales via the internet. A subsample completed the scales again after 14 days (n=1309), and indicated their smoking status after 42 days (n=1431). MEASUREMENTS: The Cigarette Withdrawal Scale (CWS), the Wisconsin Withdrawal Scale (WWS) and the Minnesota Withdrawal Form (MWF). FINDINGS: All three scales covered the main elements in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual version IV (DSM-IV) and the International Classification of Diseases version 10 (ICD-10) definitions of tobacco withdrawal, but WWS did not cover weight gain. Factor analyses indicated that only six factors were present in WWS, instead of the expected seven factors. Cronbach's alpha coefficients (0.76-0.93) were high for all scales. Test-retest coefficients were in the range of 0.66-0.86 for CWS and WWS, but were somewhat lower for some MWF items (range 0.52-0.80). In 324 ex-smokers who had quit smoking 31 days or less before baseline, craving predicted relapse at 14-day follow-up (CWS: odds ratio=1.53 per point, P=0.003; WWS: odds ratio=1.40, P=0.04; MWF: odds ratio=1.49, P=0.002). In 34 baseline smokers who had quit smoking by 14-day retest, an increase in craving (WWS and MWF), depressed mood (MWF) and difficulty concentrating (WWS) between baseline and retest predicted relapse at 42-day follow-up. In terms of construct validity, scales performed similarly, but performance on some key tests (e.g. withdrawal will increase post-cessation) were inadequate, due perhaps to methodological limitations. CONCLUSIONS: No scale showed a decisive advantage over the others. MWF has the advantage of brevity.     

Erfassung der Gleichgewichtsf?higkeit bei selbstst?ndig lebenden Erwachsenen

The purpose of this study was to validate the German translation of the originally English Fullerton Advanced Balance Scale (FAB-D). The 10-item test battery is a performance-based measure that addresses the multiple dimensions of balance. The German FAB-D using a forward-backward procedure was examined by a sample of n = 96 community dwelling older adults (71,6 ± 7,5 years of age) who had reported no history of a fall in the previous 6 months (non-fallers) and 66 older adults (age 75,3 ± 7,3 years of age) who reported falling one or more times (recurrent fallers). The following internationally accepted instruments were used for validation: The Berg-Balance-Scale (BBS), the Activities-Specific Balance Confidence (ABC-D) scale, the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE), the Trail-Making-Test (TMT), and motor tests (balance, strength, mobility). Explorative and confirmative factor analysis showed the best fit for a one dimensional solution. Cronbach's alpha of the German version of the FAB-D was 0.988. Test-retest reliability for the total score was 0.965 and ranged from 0.86-0.88 for individual items. The scales correlate with convergent measures assessing postural control and falls-related confidence (BBS, r = 0.685; Timed-Up-and-Go-Test, r = -0.632; ABC-D, r = 0.561). Criterion validity of the FAB-D was established by statistically significant correlations between the total scale, and the subdimensions of the SF-36 (physical 0.52, mental 0.38), the PASE (0.29), the TMT A (-0.30) and B (-0.41), the Chair Rising Test (0.59) and the 10 m walk (normal velocity -0.49; fast velocity -0.56). Significant differences in the FAB-D scores were found in older adults with (30,3 ± 8,6) and without falls (36,1 ± 4,2). Older adults with a recent fall history scored lower on the FAB-D than older adults without a recent fall history. To conclude, the German version of the FAB-D has properties analogous to the original English version and is apparently useful in assessing the multiple dimensions of balance in community dwelling older adults.     

The assessment of craving: psychometric properties, factor structure and a revised version of the Alcohol Craving Questionnaire (ACQ)

AIMS: The goal of the present study was to examine the psychometric properties and factor structure of the Alcohol Craving Questionnaire (ACQ). DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: The German version of the ACQ was administered to a sample of 243 alcohol-dependent or alcohol-abusing subjects. A subgroup of the sample (n = 46) completed the German translation of the Obsessive Compulsive Drinking Scale (OCDS) and the ACQ a second time. MEASUREMENTS: To validate the factor models, confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) were carried out. Examination of the psychometric properties of the ACQ included the analysis of the item characteristics to exclude non-sensitive items, an exploratory factor analysis of the remaining items and calculation of internal consistency, test-retest reliability and convergent validity. FINDINGS: Neither of the two models showed a satisfactory correspondence. An exploratory factor analysis of a revised version of the ACQ (ACQ-R), based on the psychometric properties of the items, revealed two stable factors ('urge and intention to drink alcohol' and 'reinforcement') with high internal consistency, test-retest reliability and convergent validity. The model fit was also excellent in the CFA. CONCLUSIONS: The ACQ-R is a reliable and valid instrument to assess alcohol craving. However, the ACQ-R lacks items related to loss of control. Therefore a multi-dimensional assessment, e.g. the combination of the ACQ-R and the OCDS, is recommended.     

Cannabis expectancies in substance misusers: French validation of the Marijuana Effect Expectancy Questionnaire

The aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the French version of the Marijuana Effect Expectancy Questionnaire (48 items) and study the cannabis expectancies according to the patterns of substance use and psychiatric disorders (DSM-IV). A sample of 263 subjects (average age 33.1 years [SD = 8.7], 56% men) consisting of cannabis users (n = 64), psychiatric inpatients (n = 175, most of whom were hospitalized for withdrawal), and a control group (n = 24) completed the questionnaire. Internal reliability was good (α= .87) and temporal reliability was satisfactory, with 24 of 48 items having a significant κ ≥ .41. Factor analysis showed four main factors that explained 42.1% of the total variance. The women feared Cognitive Impairment and Negative Effects, and Negative Behavioral Effects more than the men. The onset age of cannabis use, onset age of abuse, abuse and dependence were associated with fewer negative expectancies. Cannabis dependents differed from abusers by more Relaxation and Social Facilitation expectancies. Patients with major depressive episodes, panic disorder, social anxiety disorder, or posttraumatic stress disorder feared negative effects the most. Schizophrenic patients expected more Perceptual Enhancement and Craving. The French version of the Marijuana Effect Expectancy Questionnaire has good psychometric properties and is valid to assess cannabis expectancies in adolescents and adults with substance use disorders.     

Factors burdening the caregiving relatives of community-dwelling disable Japanese people

AIM: This study examined the factors associated with burdens on the primary caregivers of community-dwelling disabled people. METHODS: Participants were 78 disabled people (40 men, 38 women; mean age 77.8+/-11.5 years) who received home-based physical therapy and/or occupational therapy, and their 78 caregivers (20 men, 58 women; mean age 66.8+/-10.2 years). The caregiver burden was assessed using the short version of the Japanese version of the Zarit Caregiver Burden Interview (J-ZBI_8). In addition, the primary caregivers completed questionnaires about burdens arising from supporting the activities of daily living (ADL) using a visual analogue scale, available social support, subjective well-being, and the Motor Fitness Scale. The performance of the disabled subjects was assessed using the Bedside Mobility Scale and the Barthel Index. The disabled subjects and the caregivers were divided into higher burden (J-ZBI_8 score, 10 points and over) and lower burden groups (J-ZBI_8 score, 9 points and under) to compare the group differences in the measurements. RESULTS: The disabled participants in the lower burden group (n=41) showed significantly higher Bedside Mobility Scale scores and Barthel Index scores than those in the higher burden group (n=37). The primary caregivers in the higher burden group showed significantly higher burden due to supporting the ADL, lower subjective well-being, and lower social support as compared to those in the lower-burden group. CONCLUSION: The burden levels of the primary caregivers relating to the mobility and ADL of their recipients were assessed. The caregivers with higher burden showed less social support and low subjective well-being.