Phase II trial of etoposide, doxorubicin (Adriamycin), and cisplatin (EAP regimen) in advanced gastric cancer

Ten previously untreated patients with gastric cancer were treated with etoposide, 120 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.) on days 4, 5, and 6, Adriamycin, 20 mg/m2 i.v. on days 1 and 7, and cisplatin, 40 mg/m2 i.v. on days 2 and 8 (EAP). Etoposide, 240 mg/m2 on days 4, 5, and 6, was administered orally instead of intravenously in alternating cycles, and pharmacokinetic studies were performed in those who had previously undergone gastrectomy or who had tumor infiltrating the stomach to determine oral bioavailability. Nine patients had advanced measurable gastric cancer, and one patient had an elevated carcinoembryonic antigen after surgery for synchronous gastric and colon cancer. The median age was 54 years (range 38-69), and the median Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status was 2 (range 0-3). Nine of 10 patients had poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma. Twenty-four cycles were administered to 10 patients, and hematologic data were available for 23 courses. ECOG grade 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia developed in 19 (83%) and 8 (53%) courses, respectively. Thirteen courses (54%) were complicated by fever requiring parenteral antibiotics. Two patients (20%) died due to neutropenic sepsis. The profound myelotoxicity observed in our study prompted us to terminate the investigation prior to completing accrual. The oral bioavailability of etoposide was 21% and 36% in the two patients who had had prior gastrectomy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Preoperative chemotherapy in locally advanced and nonresectable gastric cancer: a phase II study with etoposide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin

Thirty-four patients with locally advanced, nonresectable gastric cancer (staged by laparotomy) received etoposide, Adriamycin (doxorubicin; Adria Laboratories, Columbus, OH), and cisplatin (EAP). Thirty-three patients were evaluable for response and toxicity. Second-look surgery with removal of residual tumor by gastrectomy and lymphadenectomy was performed in case of complete/partial remission (CR/PR) after EAP. After successful resection (R0- and R1-resection), two cycles of EAP were administered for consolidation therapy. Patients refusing reoperation received up to six cycles of EAP. The response rate (CR/PR) after EAP was 70% (23/33), including a 21% (7/33) rate of clinical CRs (CCRs). Two patients had minor remission (MR)/no change and seven had progressive disease. There was one early death. Nineteen of 23 responders (5 CCRs, 14 clinical PRs [CPRs]) and one patient with MR underwent second-look surgery. Five CCRs were pathologically confirmed; 10 patients with CPR were without evidence of disease (NED) after resection. In three patients (CPR), R1-resections (microscopically tumor-cell positive proximal margin) were performed; two patients are disease-free, 22+ and 33+ months after consolidation chemotherapy. In two patients, the tumor was again considered nonresectable. Twenty patients were disease-free after EAP +/- surgery +/- consolidation chemotherapy. Toxicity was primarily hematologic. Leukopenia and thrombocytopenia of World Health Organization (WHO) grade 3 occurred in 30% and 9%, respectively and grade 4 in 18% and 9% of the patients, respectively. There was no increased peri- or postoperative morbidity. After a median follow-up of 20 months for disease-free patients, the relapse rate is 60% (12/20). The median survival time for all patients is 18 months and for disease-free patients 24 months. EAP is highly effective in locally advanced gastric cancer, and offers a chance for surgery with curative intention in patients with an otherwise fatal prognosis.     

Phase II study of a combination of mitomycin,doxorubicin and cisplatin in advanced sarcomas

Summary In all 63 patients were treated monthly with a combination of mitomycin, doxorubicin, and cisplatin, and 27 (43%) experienced objective regression of their advanced sarcomas during a 3-month trial. The observed regression rate is numerically higher than any previously observed at our institution.     

A phase II study of the combination of etoposide and cisplatin in the therapy of advanced gastric cancer

Forty-eight patients with advanced gastric cancer and measurable areas of malignant disease were treated with etoposide (130 mg/m2/day X 3 days) plus cisplatin (45 mg/m2day on days 2 and 3). Both drugs were given by constant intravenous infusion and repeated every 4 weeks. Common toxic reactions included nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, alopecia, peripheral neuropathy, leukopenia, and thrombocytopenia. Most patients experienced severe but reversible toxic reactions. In 46 evaluable patients an overall objective regression rate of 28% was obtained with a median duration of regression of 4 months. Regression rates were only modestly reduced among patients with prior chemotherapy exposure (21%). Whereas this combination of etoposide and cisplatin does not appear to offer any major advantage over other single and combination regimens in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer, it shows definite activity and its lack of cross-resistance with other commonly used agents for this disease could indicate a possible role in new combination or sequential chemotherapy approaches. As an interesting sidelight, we found that 21% of our patients had elevated human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) levels, and among this group regression rates were higher than in HCG-negative patients. It would be of interest to extend these observations in other gastric carcinoma studies involving cisplatin regimens.     

Phase II study of combination therapy with high-dose cisplatin, etoposide, and mitomycin in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

Forty-six patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were treated with a combination of high-dose cisplatin, etoposide, and mitomycin. Thirty-four patients (74%) had a performance status of 1, and 39 patients (85%) had adenocarcinoma. Of the 42 patients evaluable for response and toxicity, four achieved a partial response (10%); no patient achieved a complete response. Seven patients who had received prior chemotherapy showed no major response. The median survival of all 42 patients was 23 weeks. Myelosuppression was the major dose-limiting toxicity for this regimen, and 12 of 46 patients (26%) developed neutropenic fever requiring hospitalization and parenteral antibiotics. Of the 12 patients with severe neutropenic fever, one patient died because of toxicity. Nonhematologic toxicities, including azotemia, peripheral neuropathy, nausea, vomiting, and hearing loss were transient and modest. We conclude that high-dose cisplatin combined with etoposide and mitomycin is a relatively toxic regimen with a low response rate. Further evaluation of the combination as given in this trial is not warranted.     

Phase II study of cisplatin in advanced esophageal cancer and gastric cancer

Twenty-four patients with advanced gastric cancer and 4 patients with advanced esophageal cancer were treated with cisplatin at a dose of 80-100 mg/m2 for one day or 10-20 mg/m2 for 5 consecutive days every 3-4 weeks. As for gastric cancer, 21 of 24 were evaluable for this study according to the criteria of the Japan Society for Cancer Therapy. Four of 21 patients (19%) showed partial response (PR), 7 displayed no change (NC), and 10 evidenced progressive disease (PD). Among 4 PR cases, only one had effective primary lesion. As for esophageal cancer, all 4 patients were evaluable, while 2 showed no change (NC) and another 2 exhibited progressive disease (PD). Gastrointestinal toxicity occurred in 20 patients despite the use of anti-emetic drugs. Nephrotoxicity and hematological toxicity were observed in 14 patients and 22 patients, respectively. These did not impede the continuous treatment except one case of hematological toxicity. It was concluded that cisplatin is more effective for the metastatic lesion of gastric cancer than primary lesion.     

A phase II study of etoposide, doxorubicin, and carboplatin in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer

Many phase II studies have reported improved response rates with severe toxicity of etoposide, doxorubicin (Adriamycin), and cisplatin in advanced gastric cancer. In an attempt to obtain a better regimen with high efficacy and less toxicity, a combination regimen of etoposide, doxorubicin, and carboplatin (EAC) had been developed and evaluated in this phase II study. Forty-six patients with advanced gastric cancer were enrolled in the study. The treatment consisted of doxorubicin 20 mg/m2 given intravenously on days 1 and 7, etoposide 70 mg/m2 intravenously on days 4, 5, and 6, and carboplatin 200 mg/m2 intravenously on days 2 and 8. Therapy was repeated every 4 weeks. Patients who had stable disease or who responded, received an additional two to six cycles of therapy. Among 45 patients evaluable for response and toxicity, there was a 49% objective response rate, including 7% complete remission and 42% partial response. There was 11% stable disease and 27% progressive disease. Among 11 patients with lymph node metastasis only after a curative gastrectomy, there was an 82% objective response rates with 27% having complete remission and 55% having partial response. The median follow-up was 16 months. The median survival duration of all 45 patients was 11 months. The median time to progression was 5 months. The main toxicity was myelosuppression, with a high incidence of 82% leukopenia but only 9% of grades III to IV. Gastrointestinal toxicity was mild, with a low incidence of 42% nausea and vomiting and only 2% of grades III to IV. There were no chemotherapy-related deaths. With mild and tolerable toxicity, the EAC regimen in our study has active antitumor activity in advanced gastric cancer, which may have a positive influence on long-term survival time. It has a high efficacy, especially in patients with lymph node metastasis only after a curative gastrectomy. This regimen deserves further clinical studies for testing activity and toxicity in advanced gastric cancer.     

Treatment of advanced gastric cancer with the combination fluorouracil,leucovorin, etoposide,and cisplatin: a phase II study of the ONCOPAZ cooperative group

A phase II study was performed to assess the efficacy and toxicity of the combination of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), leucovorin (LV), etoposide, and cisplatin (FLEP) in patients with advanced gastric carcinoma. A total of 46 consecutive, previously untreated patients with unresectable, measurable gastric carcinoma were treated with 300 mg/m² LV, 100 mg/m² etoposide, 500 mg/m² 5-FU, and 30 mg/m² cisplatin on days 1–3 every 28 days. All courses were given on an outpatient basis. A total of 169 courses of treatment were given. In all, 18 of the 46 patients (39%) had an objective response [95% confidence interval (CI), 25%–54%] and 2 (4%) patients experienced a clinical complete response. The median duration of response was 5 months. The main side effects were hematological and gastrointestinal. Grade 3–4 toxicity was encountered as follows: leukopenia, in 9.5% of the courses; anemia, in 3%; thrombocytopenia, in 3%; nausea/vomiting, in 4%; and diarrhea, in 5%. Hospitalization due to fever and granulocytopenia was required in 5 patients, 3 of whom died of sepsis. In conclusion, FLEP shows moderate activity in patients with advanced gastric carcinoma, albeit at the cost of a high degree of toxicity. For this reason we do not recommend its use.     

Phase II study of docetaxel and cisplatin combination chemotherapy in metastatic gastric cancer

Purpose: Docetaxel, as a single agent, has demonstrated activity in patients with advanced gastric cancer and cisplatin has shown lack of overlapping toxicities with docetaxel. Therefore, we conducted a phase II study to assess the efficacy and the toxicity of a combination regimen of docetaxel plus cisplatin in patients with advanced gastric cancer who have never been treated with palliative chemotherapy. Methods: Ninety-two patients with metastatic gastric cancer were enrolled from April 2000 to March 2004. Patients with histologically confirmed gastric adenocarcinoma, at least one bi-dimensionally measurable lesion, no prior palliative chemotherapy and at least 6 months from the end of adjuvant chemotherapy were eligible for study entry. Docetaxel 75 mg/m² and cisplatin 75 mg/m² were given on day 1. The cycle was repeated every 3 weeks. The objective response was evaluated after three cycles of chemotherapy. Toxicity was assessed according to the National Cancer Institute common toxicity criteria scale version 2.0. Results: In total, 401 cycles were administered, with a median of 5 cycles per patient (range 1–9 cycles). The median age was 56 years (range 31–76). Eighty-six patients were evaluable for treatment response. The objective response rate was 43.5% (95% CI, 33.4–53.6) with one complete response and 39 partial responses. Twenty patients (21.7%) had stable disease and 26 patients (28.3%) had a progression. The median time to progression was 7.0 months (95% CI, 5.0–9.0) and the median overall survival was 11.5 months (95% CI, 9.5–13.4). The chemotherapy was generally well tolerated and the most common grade 3–4 toxicities were neutropenia (17.4%), nausea/vomiting (13.0%) and diarrhea (7.6%). Conclusion: The combination chemotherapy of docetaxel with cisplatin in advanced gastric cancer was tolerable for most patients and showed a promising antitumor activity as a first-line therapy.Keon Woo Park and Jin Seok Ahn contributed equally to this work.     

Ifosfamide, cisplatin and etoposide combination in locally advanced inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase II study

From March 1993 to February 1997, 43 eligible patients with inoperable stage IIIA (ten patients) and stage IIIB (33 patients), histologically confirmed NSCLC received 3 courses of the ICE combination (ifosfamide 1.5 g m(-2) and mesna 750 mg m(-2) two times a day, cisplatin 25 mg m(-2) and etoposide 100 mg m(-2), all administered intravenously (i.v.) on days 1-3 every 3 weeks) with G-CSF support. After three cycles, patients were submitted to radical surgery or received two additional courses of the ICE regimen and/or curative radiotherapy. Grade 3-4 neutropenia occurred in 21% of 114 evaluable courses, but was of short duration, leading to neutropenic fever in 5% of the courses. Severe thrombocytopenia and anaemia were observed in 13% and 3% of the courses respectively. Non-haematological toxicity was generally mild with only two episodes of reversible renal impairment. The overall response rate after three chemotherapy courses was 69% (28 partial responses, one complete response). Ten patients (8/10 patients in stage IIIA, 2/33 patients in stage IIIB) underwent radical surgery. Median TTP for patients not undergoing surgery (n = 33) was 8 months (range 3-34+); median DFS for patients rendered NED by surgery (n = 10) was 26 months (range 1-54+). Median OS for the entire group was 12.5 months (range 2-57+). The ICE regimen is active in locally advanced NSCLC with acceptable toxicity and warrants further exploration as induction chemotherapy in larger series.     

Phase II study with etoposide in previously untreated advanced breast cancer

Summary A phase II study was carried out to evaluate the efficacy and safety of etoposide used as first-line chemotherapy for patients with advanced breast carcinoma. A total of 20 patients received 230 mg/m² i.v. etoposide per day for 3 days (total, 690 mg/m² per course) every 4 weeks. A total of 95 courses were given. Observed responses included 3 partial remissions (PR) and 14 cases of stable disease (NC). The median duration of response was 6 (PR) and 5.6 months (NC). Contrary to the severe hematological toxicity in heavily pretreated patients described in previous studies, no substantial problems were observed in this trial. No dose reduction was necessary, and only once did leukopenia lead to a 1-week delay in therapy. An increase in platelets up to a maximum of 685,000/mm³ was seen in all patients, particularly in those with bone metastases. No relation to the quality of remission or pretreatment was seen. Nausea, vomiting, and fatique were mild and transient, but alopecia occurred in all cases. One patient developed nonfatal anaphylactic shock after etoposide treatment.     

Phase II study of the combination of vinorelbine and cisplatin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Purpose To evaluate the efficacy and safety of combination chemotherapy with cisplatin and vinorelbine for the treatment of previously untreated patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Patients and methods Eligible patients were those with measurable NSCLC. They were treated with two or more cycles of a regimen consisting of vinorelbine 25 mg/m² on days 1 and 8 and cisplatin 80 mg/m² on day 1 every 3 weeks.Results A total of 45 patients were enrolled. The response rate was 51.1% (23/45; 95% CI 35.8% to 66.3%). The median survival was 286 days with a 1-year survival rate of 40%. The median number of treatment cycles was 2. The major toxic effect was neutropenia of grade 3 or higher (84%). Nonhematological toxicities, including vomiting (62%), were mild (grade 2 or less). There were no treatment-related deaths.Conclusion The high response rate and good tolerability proved this combination therapy to be a safe and effective treatment for advanced NSCLC.This work was supported in part by a grant-in-aid from the Ministry of Health and Welfare (Tokyo, Japan) and from the Second Term Comprehensive 10-Year Strategy for Cancer Control.     

Phase II study of weekly paclitaxel,cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil for advanced gastric cancer

Background  

Our previous phase I study provided evidence that weekly paclitaxel, cisplatin, and bolus 5-fluorouracil (weekly PCF) was effective and well tolerated in patients with advanced gastric cancer. This study was conducted to confirm the efficacy and toxicity of weekly PCF.     

First line combination chemotherapy with cisplatin and etoposide in advanced ovarian cancer

Thirty-one consecutive patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer entered a phase II study with cisplatin and etoposide combination chemotherapy. None of them had received prior chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Most patients had advanced (88%) or far advanced (61%) disease. All 31 patients are evaluable for toxicity which was significant and led to removal of five (16%) patients from the study. Of the 23 patients evaluable for response there were four clinical complete (CR) and eight partial (PR) responders for a total clinical response rate of 52% of evaluable patients and 39% of all patients. Eight patients (four clinical CR and four good PR) have undergone second look laparotomy with pathological CR in one of the clinical CR patients. Median survival time for responders and non-responders is 19 and 8 months respectively. The results obtained appear to be inferior to other cisplatin based combinations. Although this could be attributed to the unusually high proportion of patients with bulky disease and stage IV patients, we feel that the study suggests that etoposide did not add any benefits for this patient population to cisplatin as a single agent.     

Phase II study of cisplatin, etoposide and paclitaxel in locally advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of gastric/gastroesophageal junction

BACKGROUND: Unresectable and metastatic gastric cancers carry a poor and dismal prognosis. Several phase II studies have identified effective anticancer drugs. AIMS: To evaluate safety and efficacy of low-dose cisplatin, etoposide and paclitaxel (CEP) based combination chemotherapy in locally advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of gastric/gastroesophageal junction. SETTING AND DESIGN: Prospective single-arm phase II study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-three patients were enrolled onto this study, out of which, all but one received cisplatin 15 mg/m 2, etoposide 40 mg/m 2 and paclitaxel 50 mg/m 2, given on day 1 and 4 every week for three weeks in a 28-day cycle. Survival analysis was done using SPSS program. RESULTS: Median age of group was 56 years. Twenty-five were males. Twenty-nine had metastatic/inoperable disease and four patients had recurrent disease. Liver was the commonest metastatic site seen in 15 patients. With a median of 2 cycles per patient, a total of 76 cycles was administered. Grade III or IV toxicity were seen in 11 (35%) patients; diarrhea, 5 patients; vomiting, 3 patients; and neutropenia, 7 patients, 5 of whom also had fever). One patient died of neutropenic fever. Best responses, seen in 32 evaluable patients, were 2 CR (6.1%), 21 PR (63%) and 3 SD (9.2%). Four patients were considered operable after chemotherapy. With median follow-up of 11 months in surviving patients, median OS was 10 months and PFS was 8 months. Median OS was 13 months in responders versus 8 months in nonresponders (P =0.04). Seven patients survived> 12 months. CONCLUSION: Combination of low-dose CEP shows good clinical response and an acceptable toxicity profile in advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of gastric/gastroesophageal cancers. Whether addition of 5 FU or capecitabine adds to the benefit should be explored. This may be tested with other standard/conventional protocols in a randomized fashion.     

Phase II study of capecitabine and irinotecan combination chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer

The present study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a combination regimen of capecitabine plus irinotecan in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Patients with previously untreated metastatic or recurrent, measurable gastric cancer received oral capecitabine 1000 mg m(-2) twice daily from day 1 to 14 and intravenous irinotecan 100 mg m(-2) on days 1 and 8, based on a 3-week cycle. Forty-one patients were enrolled in the current study, among whom 38 were assessable for efficacy and 40 assessable for toxicity. Three complete responses and 16 partial responses were confirmed, giving an overall response rate of 46.3%. At a median follow-up of 269 days, the median time to progression and overall survival were 5.1 and 8.6 months, respectively. Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in four patients and grade 3 febrile neutropenia was observed in two patients. Grade 3 diarrhoea and grade 2 hand-foot syndrome occurred in six patients and eight patients, respectively. The combination of capecitabine and irinotecan was found to be well tolerated and effective in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Accordingly, this regimen can be regarded as one of first-line treatment options for advanced gastric cancer.     

Phase II study of the modified regimen of etoposide, leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil for patients with advanced gastric cancer

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of the treatment of advanced gastric cancer is not very good. The response rate to the original etoposide--leucovorin--5-fluorouracil (ELF) treatment is 53% with tolerable side effects. Whether increasing the dose intensity by prolonging the duration of infusion with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) from 3 to 5 days for advanced or metastatic gastric cancer patients would enhance the efficacy but not increase side effects is still unknown. METHODS: Thirty-six advanced or metastatic gastric cancer and chemotherapy-naive patients with measurable or evaluable diseases were scheduled to receive intravenous etoposide 100 mg/m2/day on days 2-4, LV 300 mg/m2/day intravenously and 5-FU 500 mg/m2/day intravenously on days 1-5, every 4 weeks. All patients who received at least two courses of chemotherapy were evaluated for tumor response, survival and response duration and toxicity according to the WHO criteria. RESULTS: Thirteen patients showed a response, including five with complete response (CR). The overall response rate was 36% (95% confidence interval, CI, 20-52%) in the whole group and 46% (95% CI 28-66%) in the 28 patients with measurable disease. The median progression-free interval and overall median survival time were 5 and 7 months, respectively. The most frequent toxicity was alopecia (grade I/II 56.3%). The incidence of grade III or greater myelosuppression was 5.9%. No treatment-related death occurred. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of the modified ELF by increasing the dosages of 5-FU and LV is not superior to the results of the original regimen, yet it is a relatively safe and tolerable combination regimen for advanced gastric cancer.