Effects of interpleurally administered bupivacaine 0.5% on opioid analgesic requirements and endocrine response during and after cholecystectomy: a randomized double-blind controlled study

In 30 patients undergoing cholecystectomy, a randomized double-blind saline-controlled study was performed using interpleural 0.5% bupivacaine with or without epinephrine (5 micrograms.ml-1) in combination with 0.8% halothane inspired concentration in oxygen. The aim of the study was to investigate whether interpleural 0.5% bupivacaine could decrease the intraoperative opioid requirements and attenuate the metabolic endocrine response to surgical stress. Patients were randomly allocated to one of three groups: Group 1: 0.5% bupivacaine; Group 2: 0.5% bupivacaine with epinephrine (5 micrograms.ml-1); and Group 3: saline. The interpleural catheter was inserted after induction of anesthesia in the spontaneously breathing patient. The study drug was injected 30 min prior to surgery. Peak plasma bupivacaine concentrations in the respective groups were 1.30 +/- 0.78 and 1.16 +/- 0.48 micrograms.ml-1. In all patients concentrations were below suggested convulsive level. Two patients in Group 1 and two in Group 2 required intraoperative fentanyl (0.1 mg each). In contrast, eight patients in the saline group received an average of 0.21 mg (range 0.1 +/- 0.4 mg) fentanyl (P less than 0.05). Postoperatively, a second dose of the study drug was given. Subsequently, pain was assessed using a visual analog score and a verbal rating scale. Pain scores decreased significantly 30 min after the interpleural injection in both bupivacaine groups and remained unchanged in the saline group (P less than 0.05). Pain management by means of interpleural bupivacaine was successful in 17 of the 20 patients. In the saline group seven out of ten patients needed additional analgesics (P less than 0.05). Cortisol levels increased in response to surgery in all groups: maximum levels in Groups 1, 2 and 3 were: 1.09 +/- 0.29, 1.11 +/- 0.20 and 1.19 +/- 0.16 mumol.l-1, respectively. Plasma glucose concentrations increased significantly in all groups: maximum levels in Groups 1, 2 and 3 were: 7.6 +/- 1.3, 7.3 +/- 1.7 and 8.3 +/- 1.7 mmol.l-1, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Continuous interpleural infusion of bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia after surgery with flank incisions: a double-blind comparison of 0.25% and 0.5% solutions.

Postoperative analgesia, as assessed by visual analogue scale scores (0-10) and patient-controlled analgesia morphine requirements, pulmonary function (forced vital capacity and forced expiratory volume in 1 s), and plasma bupivacaine concentrations were studied in patients receiving interpleural blockade with bupivacaine after surgery with a flank incision. Two groups of 10 patients received either 0.5% or 0.25% bupivacaine, both with epinephrine (5 micrograms/mL). Pain relief was initiated when patients had visual analogue scale scores greater than or equal to 4. Patients received 21 mL of bupivacaine 0.25% or 0.5% in a double-blind fashion. One hour later, a continuous infusion of 5 mL/h of the study solution was started. At the same time, patient-controlled analgesia became accessible to the patients. The onset time of pain relief and the area under the visual analogue scale score-time curves over the first 8 h were similar in both groups. Patient-controlled analgesia morphine use was also similar in the 0.25% (21.3 +/- 14.6 mg) and 0.5% (21.0 +/- 16.0 mg) groups (mean +/- SD). In both groups, forced vital capacity and forced expiratory volume in 1 s improved significantly within 60 min (P less than 0.05). Peak plasma concentrations (Cmax) and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) over 24 h were higher (P less than 0.001) in the 0.5% group (Cmax, 1.47 +/- 0.37 micrograms/mL; AUC, 1511 +/- 323 micrograms.mL-1.min) than those in the 0.25% group (Cmax, 0.55 +/- 0.22 micrograms/mL; AUC, 680 +/- 118 micrograms.mL-1.min) (mean +/- SD).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Clinical evaluation of clonidine added to lidocaine solution for epidural anesthesia

The effects of clonidine added to lidocaine solution used for epidural anesthesia were assessed in 92 women scheduled for surgery and premedicated with diazepam 10 mg po. Patients received 18 ml 2% lidocaine with clonidine 5 micrograms.ml-1 (group C-5, n = 26), with clonidine 10 micrograms.ml-1 (group C-10, n = 20), with epinephrine 5 micrograms.ml-1 (group E, n = 26), or plain (group P, n = 20). No significant difference in the number of segments of analgesia was found at any observation period among the four groups of patients. The decreases in mean blood pressure (BP) observed 20 min after epidural injection in those given clonidine (5 +/- 8% for C-5, 10 +/- 11% for C-10, mean +/- SD) were similar to those given plain lidocaine (7 +/- 12%) but significantly less than those given epinephrine (18 +/- 12%, P less than 0.01 vs. C-5 or P). The response of BP to ephedrine given for restoring BP during anesthesia was not attenuated in patients who received epidural clonidine. Heart rate (HR) decreased significantly in patients given clonidine 10 micrograms.ml-1 (7 +/- 8%, P less than 0.01), but not in those given clonidine 5 micrograms.ml-1, whereas HR increased significantly in those given lidocaine plain or with epinephrine (10 +/- 8% and 28 +/- 14%, respectively, P less than 0.01). The incidence of sinus bradycardia was similar among the four groups of patients. Significant differences were also observed in sedation score between clonidine groups and groups P or E; sedation appeared approximately 10-20 min after epidural injection in both clonidine groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Post-thoracotomy analgesia and serum concentration of epidurally administered morphine; a pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study

Twenty patients who underwent thoracotomy were given 2mg of epidural morphine postoperatively. Serum morphine concentrations were determined, analyzed pharmacokinetically, and compared with the degree of analgesia obtained. Excellent analgesia was attained in 11 patients and fair analgesia in the remaining 9 patients. Onset of analgesia was at 15.8 +/- 4.8 mins and 24.7 +/- 3.5 mins in the excellent and fair analgesia groups, respectively. This difference in time was statistically significant (P less than 0.05). There was no significant difference in the duration of analgesia between the two groups. Maximal concentration (Cmax) was calculated to be 38.5 +/- 4.2 ng.ml-1 in the excellent analgesia group and 25.7 +/- 4.3 ng.ml-1 in the fair group. The area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) in the fair group was approximately 20% of that in the excellent group. It is concluded that serum morphine levels correlated with analgesic effect in patients receiving epidural morphine after thoracotomy.     

A randomized, double-blind comparison of the effects of interpleural bupivacaine and saline on morphine requirements and pulmonary function after cholecystectomy

The effect of interpleural bupivacaine and saline placebo on morphine requirements and pulmonary function after cholecystectomy was investigated. Twenty-six patients were randomly assigned on postoperative day 1 to receive either 20 ml preservative-free saline (group 1) or 20 ml 0.5% bupivacaine with epinephrine, 5 micrograms/ml (group 2) through an interpleural catheter. Adequacy of pain relief was determined by the amount of morphine used by the patient following interpleural injection. Morphine use via a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) system was recorded for several hours before and after interpleural injection. All patients had a forced vital capacity (FVC) and FEV1 measurement immediately before and 1 h after interpleural injection. Mean hourly PCA morphine use ranged from 1.6 to 2.8 mg for the 6 h prior to interpleural treatment for groups 1 and 2. There was no difference in PCA use between the groups during this time. Group 1 patients did not reduce PCA morphine use after interpleural saline. Patients in group 2, however, significantly reduced PCA morphine use after interpleural bupivacaine. Mean PCA morphine use for group 2 was 0.38 +/- 0.15 mg/h (mean +/- SE) (81% reduction vs. control) for the first 2 h after bupivacaine (P less than 0.05). Mean PCA use in group 2 was 0.52 +/- 0.2 mg/h (73% reduction vs. control) for the third hour after bupivacaine (P less than 0.05). At the fourth and fifth hours after bupivacaine injection, mean PCA morphine use was not significantly different from that in group 1. FVC and FEV1 did not improve after interpleural saline.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Effect of epidural clonidine on analgesia and pharmacokinetics of epidural fentanyl in postoperative patients

Epidural clonidine produces postoperative analgesia in patients and potentiates opioid analgesia in animals. The aim of the current study was to assess the effect of epidural clonidine on the plasma concentrations and analgesic effect of fentanyl after epidural administration. Twenty ASA physical status 2 or 3 patients recovering from abdominal surgery were allocated randomly to receive either epidural fentanyl (100 micrograms in 10 ml isotonic saline; EF group) or epidural fentanyl (same dose) plus epidural clonidine (150 micrograms; EF + C group) in isotonic saline solution. Analgesia was assessed over a period of 12 h after epidural injection. Venous samples were obtained until 360 min after epidural injection for radioimmunoassay determination of plasma fentanyl concentration. Onset of analgesia was similar in the two groups of patients (13 +/- 6 and 13 +/- 3 min, respectively, after injection), but duration was more than doubled in the patients receiving clonidine (543 +/- 183 vs. 250 +/- 64 min). Peak plasma fentanyl concentrations (Fmax) and the time to reach Cmax (Tmax) were comparable in the two groups (0.29 +/- 0.15 ng.ml-1 at 16.2 +/- 14.8 min in the EF group and 0.27 +/- 0.11 ng.ml-1 at 8.3 +/- 5.5 min in the EF + C group), as were plasma concentrations at each definite time of measurement. Drowsiness and hypotension were noticed in the EF + C group. Thus, epidural clonidine appears to prolong epidural fentanyl analgesia without affecting its plasma concentration.     

Epinephrine does not prolong the analgesia of 20 mL ropivacaine 0.5% or 0.2% in a femoral three-in-one block.

We tested the effect of epinephrine added to 20 mL ropivacaine 0.5% and 0.2% on postoperative analgesia via a femoral catheter after total knee replacement. Forty-one patients undergoing total knee replacement under combined peripheral block/general anesthesia were randomly allocated to two groups. After insertion of a femoral catheter, 21 patients in the Ropivacaine-Epinephrine (ROPI-EPI) group received 20 mL ropivacaine 0.5% plus epinephrine 1:200,000, whereas 20 patients in the Ropivacaine group (ROPI) received 20 mL plain ropivacaine 0.5%. Thereafter, a sciatic block with 30 mL bupivacaine 0.5% plus epinephrine 1:200,000 was performed in all patients, followed by general anesthesia. After surgery, patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with ropivacaine 0.2% plus epinephrine 1:200,000 for Group ROPI-EPI and plain ropivacaine 0.2% for Group ROPI was available via the femoral catheter (200 mL ropivacaine 0.2% +/- epinephrine, bolus 20 mL, lockout 120 min). The patients were instructed to use PCA when the knee pain score was >3 cm. The interval between the initial ropivacaine injection and the first PCA injection determined the duration of 20 mL ropivacaine 0.5% +/- epinephrine, whereas the interval between the first and second PCA injection determined the duration of 20 mL ropivacaine 0.2% +/- epinephrine. The average duration of ropivacaine 0.5% was 657 +/- 345 min for the ROPI-EPI group and 718 +/- 423 min for the ROPI group (NS), whereas for ropivacaine 0.2%, the average duration was 409 +/- 245 min for the ROPI-EPI group and 419 +/- 339 min for the ROPI group (not significant). We conclude that epinephrine does not influence the duration of analgesia of the ropivacaine concentrations investigated. IMPLICATIONS: We evaluated the effect of epinephrine on the duration of analgesia of 20 mL ropivacaine 0.5% or 0.2% injected in femoral three-in-one block for pain relief after total knee replacement. Our results show that epinephrine does not alter the duration of analgesia of the two solutions investigated.     

Lidocaine hydrocarbonate and lidocaine hydrochloride for cesarean section: transplacental passage and neonatal effects

Twenty-six patients, ASA physical status 1, scheduled for elective cesarean section, were divided at random into two groups and received via an epidural catheter 20 ml of 2.2% lidocaine hydrocarbonate (17.3 mg.ml-1 lidocaine base) with 5 micrograms.ml-1 epinephrine freshly added (Group CO2 = 13 patients) or 20 ml of 2% lidocaine hydrochloride (17.3 mg.ml-1 lidocaine base) also with 5 micrograms.ml-1 epinephrine freshly added. Following clampage of the umbilical cord (at 40.1 +/- 4.9 min after the injection of lidocaine for the CO2 group and at 41.0 +/- 5.4 min for the HCl group), serum concentrations of lidocaine were measured both in the mother and in the umbilical vein. All newborns were examined by the same blinded pediatrician with Apgar scores at 1, 5 and 10 min and with Neurobehavioral Adaptive Capacity Scores (NACS) at 15 min, 2 h and 24 h. The concentrations of lidocaine in the serum were comparable in both groups: in the mothers 8.61 +/- 1.48 mumol.l-1 for the CO2 group vs 8.04 +/- 2.36 mumol.l-1 for the HCl group and in the newborns 3.86 +/- 0.84 mumol.l-1 for the CO2 group vs 3.92 +/- 0.95 mumol.l-1 for the HCl group. The ratio of umbilical vein to maternal vein concentrations of lidocaine was also similar in both groups: 0.45 +/- 0.07 for the CO2 group vs 0.54 +/- 0.24 for the HCl group. The percentage of newborns with a normal NACS (score > or = 35/40) was equal in both groups, i.e. 91% at 15 min and 2 h of life and 100% at 24 h of life.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

The pharmacokinetics and maternal and neonatal effects of epidural lidocaine in preeclampsia

The pharmacokinetics and maternal and neonatal effects of epidural lidocaine were compared in ten preeclamptic and five normotensive women undergoing cesarean section at 36-40 weeks of gestation. Lumbar epidural anesthesia was achieved using 15-20 ml of 2% lidocaine without epinephrine. Serial venous samples for lidocaine levels were drawn from all the mothers during the procedure and up to 6 hr after the initial injection. Umbilical venous and arterial samples were drawn at delivery for measurement of neonatal acid-base status and lidocaine levels. There were no significant differences between normotensive and preeclamptic patients in the total dose of lidocaine, peak maternal plasma concentration, volume of distribution, maternal elimination half-life and umbilical vein/maternal vein ratios. The calculated area under the concentration time curve in preeclamptic patients (18.5 +/- 4.7 micrograms X hr X ml-1) was significantly greater than in normotensive mothers (14.1 +/- 1.3 micrograms X hr X ml-1) (P less than 0.02). Total maternal body clearance in preeclamptic patients (24.5 +/- 7.1 L/hr) was significantly lower than in normotensives (31.1 +/- 4.4 L/hr) (P less than 0.05). Neonatal outcome as evaluated by Apgar scores, umbilical arterial and venous blood gas tensions, umbilical vein/maternal vein ratios, and early neonatal neurobehavior scores at 4 hr and 24 hr after birth were similar in the two groups. The results indicate that the total maternal body clearance of lidocaine is prolonged in preeclampsia, and repeated administration of lidocaine can result in higher blood levels than in normotensive parturients.     

Continuous intercostal blockade with lidocaine after thoracic surgery. Clinical and pharmacokinetic study

The efficacy and the side effects of a continuous infusion of lidocaine in the fifth intercostal space for the management of postoperative pain after lateral thoracotomy were evaluated in 20 adults. An indwelling catheter was inserted in the appropriate intercostal space before thoracotomy closure. After recovery from general anesthesia, a loading dose of 3 mg/kg of 1.5% lidocaine with epinephrine 1:160,000 was injected through the catheter, followed by a continuous infusion of 1% lidocaine without epinephrine at a rate of 1 mg.kg-1.h-1 for 54 h. In seven patients pharmacokinetic data were obtained. Pain, assessed by visual continuous analog scale, decreased from a median score of 8 (range, 7-10) to a score of 5 (range, 2-7) 20 min after the loading dose of lidocaine and continued to decrease until the end of the study (P = 0.0001). Complete cutaneous analgesia, assessed by pinprick test, was seen in a median of three thoracic spinal segments (range, 0-6) with partial cutaneous analgesia in seven segments (range, 6-9) 40 min after the loading dose, and levels that remained unchanged for 54 h (P = 0.0001). Peak lidocaine serum concentrations, 1.9 +/- 0.7 micrograms/mL, were present 9 +/- 3 min after injection of the loading dose. Serum concentrations of lidocaine under steady state conditions averaged 4.8 +/- 0.9 micrograms/mL (range, 3.5-5.8 micrograms/mL). This level under steady state conditions, though below the toxic level, suggests that additional bolus injection of lidocaine during the course of infusion might result in potentially toxic serum levels of lidocaine.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Interpleural analgesia after thoracotomy

We examined the effects of the following variables on interpleural analgesia after thoracotomy: addition of epinephrine to local anesthetic, thoracostomy drainage, two-catheter placement, and location of catheter tips. Twenty patients were randomized to have one catheter (paravertebral tip location) or two catheters (paravertebral and lateral thoracic wall tip locations). Interpleural catheters were sutured to the parietal pleura by the surgeon at time of wound closure. Patients were then randomly assigned to receive 20 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine through the single catheter or 10 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine with or without 1:200,000 epinephrine through each of the two catheters while supine. Bupivacaine concentrations in whole blood and in thoracostomy drainage fluid were assayed by gas chromatography. Actual content of bupivacaine in the drainage fluid was calculated. Degree of analgesia was assessed by verbal numerical pain scores over the first 4 h and opioid demand thereafter. Addition of epinephrine to bupivacaine did not influence the degree of analgesia. Approximately 30%-40% of any administered dose of bupivacaine was lost via the thoracostomy tube over a 4-h period. There was no correlation between the true initial dose (100 mg minus thoracostomy drainage) and Cmax. Use of two catheters resulted in significantly less opioid requirements after an initial 8-h period. Failure to achieve adequate interpleural analgesia in postthoracotomy patients may be related to loss of anesthetic via thoracostomy drainage, presence of extravasated blood and tissue fluid in the pleural space, and possibly sequestration and channeling of flow of local anesthetic by restricted motion of an operated lung.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Interscalene brachial plexus blockade with lidocaine in chronic renal failure - a pharmacokinetic study

Plasma lidocaine concentrations, latency of onset, and duration of anaesthesia, were determined after interscalene brachial plexus block in 16 patients presenting for elective upper limb surgery. Eight patients had normal renal function and eight had chronic renal failure, as determined by creatinine clearance. Significantly higher plasma lidocaine levels were recorded ten minutes after infiltration in patients with chronic renal failure (p less than 0.05). Cmax plasma levels for normal patients (5.6 +/- 1.1 micrograms.ml-1) and for patients with chronic renal failure (6.6 +/- 1.6 micrograms.ml-1) were not significantly different. The latency of onset and duration of anaesthesia were similar in both groups. One per cent lidocaine solution may be administered to patients with normal and impaired renal function to provide effective brachial plexus blockade for short surgical procedures.     

Accuracy of laser Doppler capillary flow measurements for predicting blood loss from skin incisions in pigs

This study assesses the clinical applicability of laser Doppler capillary flow measurements for predicting blood loss from a surgical incision. To produce a wide range of blood flows, we injected lidocaine 1%, lidocaine 1% plus octapressin (0.03 IU.ml-1), and lidocaine 1% plus epinephrine (5 micrograms.ml-1) subcutaneously into three separate sites on the flank of each animal (N = 6). Laser Doppler flow measurements were made before and 10 minutes after injection Subcutaneous injection of lidocaine tended to increase cutaneous blood flow (96 +/- 13 to 153 +/- 30 mV, mean +/- SE, P = 0.09). Blood flow tended to decrease after injection of lidocaine with epinephrine (101 +/- 13 to 57 +/- 10 mV, P = 0.03) or octapressin (108 +/- 20 to 58 +/- 11 mV, P = 0.08). Laser Doppler measurements were higher after the injection of plain lidocaine than after that of lidocaine with either epinephrine or octapressin (P = 0.004). A standard incision was performed at each site and blood loss measured over the subsequent 10 minutes. Laser Doppler measurements correlated with the amount of bleeding from the surgical incision (R = 0.69, P less than 0.001). We conclude that the laser Doppler is a useful tool for evaluating the ability of subcutaneously injected local anesthetics (vasodilators) or vasoconstrictors to alter bleeding from skin incisions.     

Labor analgesia with epidural bupivacaine plus fentanyl: enhancement with epinephrine and inhibition with 2-chloroprocaine

Epidural injection of drug combinations may decrease toxicity by decreasing the dose of each component, but may also result in detrimental drug interactions. In this study interactions among bupivaciane, fentanyl, epinephrine, 2-chloroprocaine, and lidocaine for epidural analgesia during labor were examined. In part 1 of the study, healthy parturients received in a random manner either 10 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine with 5 micrograms/ml fentanyl (n = 50), or 10 ml of this combination with 3.33 micrograms/ml freshly added epinephrine (n = 50). Epinephrine prolonged the median duration of pain relief (180 vs. 138 min, P less than 0.05) without affecting duration of first or second stages of labor, or neonatal Apgar scores. Blood pressure decreased slightly more in those receiving epinephrine, although the incidence of hypotension requiring treatment did not differ between groups. Part 2 of the study evaluated the possibility that local anesthetic used for confirming catheter tip location may interfere with the analgesic action of this bupivacaine-fentanyl-epinephrine (BFE) combination. In 50 additional parturients, a test dose of either 2-chloroprocaine (n = 25) or lidocaine (n = 25) was injected through the epidural catheter and was followed by injection of the BFE mixture. The lidocaine test dose group had a greater duration of analgesia than the 2-chloroprocaine test dose group (median duration of 164 vs. 91 min, P less than 0.05). The authors conclude that the addition of epinephrine 3.33 micrograms/ml significantly increases the duration of analgesia obtained from 0.25% bupivacaine with 5 micrograms/ml fentanyl. However, prior injection of 2-chloroprocaine, but not lidocaine, significantly decreases the duration of analgesia achieved with this BFE mixture.     

Analgesic effects of interpleural bupivacaine with fentanyl for post-thoracotomy pain

OBJECTIVE: The analgesic effect of bupivacaine/fentanyl with epinephrine given interpleurally after thoracotomy was investigated in a randomized placebo and intravenous controlled study. DESIGN: Prospective clinical study. SETTING: University teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status II and III patients scheduled for posterolateral thoracotomy with general anesthesia. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly divided into 4 groups to receive either 0.5% bupivacaine/1.5 microg/kg of fentanyl with 5 microg/mL of epinephrine (n = 15, group IPBF), 0.5 % bupivacaine with 5 microg/mL of epinephrine (n = 15, group IPB), or saline (n = 15, group IPS) in a total volume of 15 to 20 mL in 60 seconds by an interpleural catheter placed at the end of surgery by direct vision. The same volume of bupivacaine 0.25% and 1.5 microg/kg of fentanyl with 5 microg/mL of epinephrine to group IPBF, bupivacaine 0.25% with 5 microg/mL of epinephrine to group IPB or saline to group IPS was injected through the interpleural catheter every 6 hours for 48 hours postoperatively. Intravenous fentanyl (n = 15, group IVF) and interpleural saline groups received 1.5 microg/kg of fentanyl intravenously at the first complaint of pain. All patients also received patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with fentanyl for 48 hours postoperatively. Metamizol sodium was used as a rescue analgesic. MEASUREMENTS and MAIN RESULTS: Adequacy of pain relief was evaluated with the "Prince Henry Pain Scale" and visual analog pain scale. Fentanyl consumption via PCA and complications were evaluated for 48 hours. Visual analog scale scores were significantly higher in the interpleural saline group at 4 and 12 hours (6.6 +/- 1.2 and 5.0 +/- 2.1, respectively) postoperatively. Significantly more patients in the IPBF group had lower pain scores during coughing and deep breathing. Fentanyl consumption via PCA device was significantly higher in the intravenous fentanyl group (1,069 +/- 96.9 microg) than the interpleural groups (577.3 +/- 72.2 microg, 651.1 +/- 61.9 microg, and 601.0 +/- 22.6 microg in IPBF, IPB, and IPS groups, respectively). CONCLUSION: It is concluded that total fentanyl consumption via PCA decreased in all interpleural groups, but pain during coughing and deep breathing was significantly reduced in only the interpleural bupivacaine/fentanyl with epinephrine group.     

Addition of clonidine to 0.5% lidocaine for intravenous locoregional anesthesia

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the effect of the addition of clonidine to lidocaine on postoperative pain after intravenous regional anaesthesia. STUDY DESIGN: Double blind prospective study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-five patients were randomly allocated to two groups: group 1 (n = 25) receiving 3 mg.kg-1 of lidocaine 0.5% added to saline and group 2 (n = 20) receiving 3 mg.kg-1 of lidocaine 0.5% added to clonidine (150 micrograms). Postoperative analgesia was assessed using a visual analogue pain score (VAPS) and the time to first analgesic request. The incidence of side effects after tourniquet release was noted. Analysis of variance, Kruskall Wallis and chi 2 tests were used for statistical analysis. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Age, ASA class, duration and type of surgery, tourniquet time and sensory block duration were comparable for the two groups. The time to first antalgic request after deflation of tourniquet was similar in the two groups (38 +/- 15 min versus 44 +/- 19 min), while VAPS score was lower (p < 0.05) in the clonidine group (5.2 versus 6.8). The incidence of side effects was comparable in the two groups. CONCLUSION: The addition of clonidine (150 micrograms) to lidocaine for intravenous regional anaesthesia improved postoperative analgesia but in a limited and short-lasting manner.     

Interpleural or thoracic epidural analgesia for pain after thoracotomy. A double blind study

The analgetic effect of bupivacaine given epidurally or interpleurally after thoracotomy was investigated in a randomized, double blind, placebo controlled study. 32 patients with both an epidural and an interpleural catheter, were randomized to receive either interpleural or epidural analgesia. The interpleural group was given bupivacaine 5 mg ml^-1 with 5 microgram epinephrine as a 30 ml interpleural bolus, followed by a continuous infusion starting at a rate of 7 ml per hour and epidurally a bolus of 0.9% NaCl followed by a continuous infusion of 0.9% NaCl. The epidural group was given bupivacaine 3.75 mg–ml^-1 with 5 microgram epinephrine as a 5 ml epidural bolus, followed by a continuous infusion starting at a rate of 5 ml per hour and interpleurally a bolus of 0.9% NaCl followed by a continuous infusion of 0.9% NaCl. The draining tubes were clamped during the injection of the interpleural bolus and 15 min afterwards. Adequacy of pain relief was evaluated with the Prins–Henry pain scale. Morphine requirement was registered, there was no difference between the groups in painscores or need for additional morphine.     

Intrapleural analgesia for postthoracotomy pain and blood levels of bupivacaine following intrapleural injection

An epidural type catheter was placed in the pleural space under direct vision before the closure of the chest in 24 patients who underwent thoracotomy for various types of lung or aortic surgery. All patients received intrapleural injections of 20 ml of 0.5 per cent bupivacaine with or without epinephrine as initial pain therapy. Patients also received subsequent doses of a similar volume of 0.375 per cent bupivacaine with epinephrine 1:200,000 up to four times a day for a maximum duration of seven days. Good pain relief was achieved in patients who underwent lateral and posterior thoracotomies. No pain relief was achieved in patients who underwent anterior thoracotomy or in patients in whom there was excessive bleeding in the pleural space. Bupivacaine blood concentrations were measured in 11 patients following the initial dose of 20 ml of 0.5 per cent bupivacaine (with epinephrine 1:200,000 in five of the 11 patients). The mean peak plasma concentration of bupivacaine when used with epinephrine was 0.32 +/- 0.02 microgram.ml-1. The mean peak plasma concentrations of bupivacaine when used without epinephrine was 1.28 +/- 0.48 microgram.ml-1. Our present data show that intrapleural analgesia is useful in the management of postoperative pain in patients who undergo thoracotomy. Our data also show that there is a significant decrease in peak plasma concentrations of bupivacaine when epinephrine is added to the solution (P less than 0.05).     

Hemodynamic and blockade effects of high/low epinephrine doses during axillary brachial plexus blockade with lidocaine 1.5%: A randomized, double-blinded study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Although epinephrine commonly is added to local anesthetics for regional anesthesia, rarely it may cause undesirable hemodynamic side effects. This study compared the hemodynamic and blockade effects of 25 and 200 microg epinephrine during axillary brachial plexus blockade with lidocaine 1.5%. METHODS: Sixty American Society of Anesthesiologist classification I or II patients were divided randomly into 3 groups. Patients in group 1 received 5 mL of saline containing 25 microg epinephrine and then 35 mL of 1.5% lidocaine; patients in group 2 received 5 mL of saline alone and then 200 microg of epinephrine mixed with 35 mL of 1.5% lidocaine; patients in group 3 received 5 mL of saline alone and then 35 mL of 1.5% lidocaine. Hemodynamic data were measured for 1 to 10 minutes at 1-minute intervals after axillary injection. The duration time of motor and sensory block was recorded. RESULTS: Complete anesthesia was achieved in 85% of patients in groups 1 and 3 and 90% in group 2. Motor block duration was significantly longer in group 2 than in groups 1 and 3 (P <.05). There were no significant differences in analgesia between groups 1 and 2. Analgesia duration was significantly longer in groups 1 and 2 than in group 3 (P <.05). Heart rate from the 3rd to 6th minute was higher in group 2 than in groups 1 and 3 (P <.05). Systolic arterial pressure from the 3rd to 5th minute and diastolic arterial pressure from 2nd to 6th minute were higher in group 2 than in groups 1 and 3 (P <.05). CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose epinephrine offers more stable hemodynamics and similar blockade, and thus may be beneficial for patients undergoing forearm and hand surgery who are at risk for tachycardia and/or hypertension.     

Comparison between clonidine and epinephrine admixture to lidocaine in brachial plexus block.

The admixture of clonidine or epinephrine to lidocaine for brachial plexus block was studied with regard to duration of block, postoperative analgesia, and plasma concentrations of lidocaine. Thirty-three patients of ASA physical status I and II received an admixture of either clonidine (150 micrograms; n = 15) or epinephrine (200 micrograms; n = 18) to 40 mL of 1% lidocaine in a randomized, double-blind fashion. Bone surgery predominated in those patients receiving clonidine and soft-tissue surgery in those receiving epinephrine (P less than 0.05). Onset and duration of block were not different between the groups. With the admixture of clonidine, fewer patients were completely pain free for greater than 12 h (13.3%) and pain scores (visual analogue scale 0-10) were higher 6 h after the block (median 4; range 0-6) than with epinephrine (61.1%; median 2; range 0-7, respectively; P less than 0.05). In patients who had received clonidine, peak plasma concentrations of lidocaine were higher (10.29 +/- 2.96 mumol/L) and occurred earlier (23.7 +/- 9.3 min; mean +/- SD) than in those treated with epinephrine (6.9 +/- 1.71 mumol/L; 72.5 +/- 56.2 min; P less than 0.05). This indicates the absence of a local vasoconstrictor effect of clonidine and implies a reduced margin of safety with regard to local anesthetic toxicity. Although clonidine does not offer advantages compared with epinephrine, it may be a useful adjunct to local anesthetics in those patients in whom the administration of epinephrine is contraindicated.