Deficient prepulse inhibition of acoustic startle in Hooded-Wistar rats compared with Sprague-Dawley rats

1. Prepulse inhibition of acoustic startle has been suggested as a model of sensorimotor gating and central sensory information processing. Prepulse inhibition is impaired in patients with schizophrenia and responses can be restored by antipsychotic drug treatment. In the present study, startle and prepulse inhibition of startle were compared in different rat strains. 2. Sprague-Dawley rats showed robust inhibition of startle responses by increasing intensities of prepulse delivered just before the startle stimulus. In contrast, at both 4 and 10 weeks of age, rats of the Hooded-Wistar line had markedly reduced prepulse inhibition, although startle responses were not different. 3. Treatment with the dopamine receptor agonist apomorphine (0.1 mg/kg) or the N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist MK-801 (0.1 mg/kg) caused disruption of prepulse inhibition in Sprague-Dawley rats. In Hooded-Wistar rats, apomorphine further reduced the already low level of prepulse inhibition, but MK-801 treatment had no significant effect. This suggests that the impaired prepulse inhibition in Hooded-Wistar rats could be caused by changes in glutamatergic activity and/or NMDA receptors in these rats. 4. In photocell cages, spontaneous exploratory activity and inner zone activity were significantly lower in Hooded-Wistar rats than in Sprague-Dawley rats. Similarly, on the elevated plus-maze, Hooded-Wistar rats showed a lower propensity to visit the open arms. In contrast, amphetamine (0.5 mg/kg)-induced locomotor hyperactivity, an animal model of psychosis, was enhanced in Hooded-Wistar rats. 5. These data suggest that the Hooded-Wistar line could be a useful genetic animal model to study the interaction of glutamatergic and dopaminergic mechanisms in anxiety and schizophrenia.     

The effect of zotepine, risperidone, clozapine and olanzapine on MK-801-disrupted sensorimotor gating

Dizocilpine (MK-801; 0.3 mg/kg i.p.)-induced disruption in prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle response (PPI) can be preferentially restored by “atypical” antipsychotics. In contrast, some findings indicate that not all of the “atypical” antipsychotics, such as clozapine and risperidone, are effective in restoring the NMDA antagonist-induced deficits in PPI.

In our study, we evaluated the effect of four different “atypical” antipsychotic drugs on deficits in PPI induced by MK-801. Zotepine and risperidone have high affinities to D2-like and 5-HT_2A receptors, while clozapine and olanzapine have multipharmacological profiles with the highest affinities to serotonin 5-HT_1A,2A/2C receptors and muscarinic receptors.

Results have shown that MK-801 disrupted PPI and increased the ASR in rats. Our results showed no effect of zotepine (1 and 2 mg/kg) and risperidone (0.1 and 1 mg/kg) on disrupted PPI by MK-801. Administration of clozapine (5 and 10 mg/kg) and olanzapine (2.5 and 5 mg/kg) restored the deficits in PPI induced by MK-801. Additionally, we found a decrease of approximately 46% in PPI after administration of clozapine (5 mg/kg) and olanzapine (2.5 and 5 mg/kg) without MK-801 treatment.

In summary, the four “atypical” antipsychotics had different efficacies to restore the disrupted PPI by MK-801. Only clozapine and olanzapin restored the MK-801-induced deficits in PPI.     

Effects of haloperidol and clozapine on prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle response and the N1/P2 auditory evoked potential in man.

Contraction of the orbicularis oculi muscle in response to a sudden loud sound (acoustic startle response) and the N1/P2 component of the auditory evoked potential are both attenuated when a brief low-intensity stimulus is presented 30-500 ms before the 'startle-eliciting' stimulus (prepulse inhibition). Here, we report the effects of the 'conventional' antipsychotic drug haloperidol and the 'atypical' antipsychotic clozapine on these responses. Fifteen males (aged 19-54 years) participated in four sessions at 7-day intervals, in which they received clozapine 3 mg, clozapine 6 mg, haloperidol 3 mg and placebo, according to a balanced double-blind design. Electromyographic (EMG) responses of the orbicularis oculi muscle and N1/P2 auditory evoked potentials were recorded in a 20-min session, 3 h after treatment. Subjects received 40 trials in which 1-kHz sounds were presented: (i) 40 ms, 115 dB ('pulse alone' trials) and (ii) 40 ms, 85 dB, followed after 120 ms by 40 ms, 115 dB ('prepulse/pulse' trials). Mean amplitudes of the EMG response and the N1/P2 potential were derived from the pulse-alone trials and, in each case, percentage prepulse inhibition was calculated. Serum prolactin was measured after each treatment, and autonomic (heart rate, blood pressure, salivation) and psychological (visual analogue self-ratings of mood and alertness, critical flicker fusion frequency) measures were taken before and after each treatment. Clozapine 6 mg significantly reduced the amplitude of the EMG response without altering its inhibition by prepulses. Clozapine 6 mg did not affect the amplitude of the N1/P2 potential, but significantly attenuated prepulse inhibition of that response. Clozapine 3 mg and haloperidol had no significant effect on either response. Clozapine 3 mg and 6 mg, but not haloperidol, reduced subjective alertness and critical flicker fusion frequency. Clozapine 6 mg reduced salivation. Haloperidol, but not clozapine, elevated serum prolactin levels. These results confirm that prepulse inhibition of the startle response and of the N1/P2 complex have different pharmacological sensitivities. The abililty of clozapine to attenuate the startle response may reflect its sedative action. The basis of the abililty of clozapine to suppress prepulse inhibition of the N1/P2 potential remains uncertain.     

D1 and D2 dopamine receptor antagonists reverse prepulse inhibition deficits in an animal model of schizophrenia

The amplitude of the acoustic startle response is decreased if the startle stimulus is preceded by a nonstartle eliciting stimulus. This sensorimotor gating phenomenon, known as prepulse inhibition, is diminished in schizophrenic individuals. In rats, the dopamine agonist apomorphine disrupts prepulse inhibition and this disruption is reversed by classical and atypical antipsychotics. Furthermore, the ability of antipsychotics to reverse the apomorphine disruption is correlated with clinical potency and D₂ receptor affinity. In the present study, the role of the D₁ receptor in prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle response was studied; the effects of the D₁ receptor antagonist SCH 23390 were examined and compared to the effects of the D₂ receptor antagonist eticlopride. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were placed into a startle chamber and presented with auditory stimuli consisting of either 95 or 105 dB noise bursts presented alone or preceded by a 75 dB noise burst. Trials consisting of no stimulus and the 75 dB prepulse stimulus alone were also included. These six trial types (ten each) were randomly presented within a 35-min session. Rats treated with 2.0 mg/kg apomorphine (SC) demonstrated a significant disruption of prepulse inhibition compared to vehicle controls. Pretreatment with the D₁ antagonist SCH 23390 (0.01, 0.05, 0.1 mg/kg SC) or the D₂ antagonist eticlopride (0.01, 0.05, 0.1 mg/kg SC) attenuated the disruptive effects of apomorphine. These results indicate that selective blockade of either the D₁ or D₂ receptor subtype is sufficient in reversing the sensorimotor gating deficits produced by apomorphine. The effects of eticlopride and SCH 23390 on prepulse inhibition in saline-treated rats were also examined. Each antagonist produced a dose-related facilitation of prepulse inhibition, suggesting that endogenous DA acting at either receptor subtype plays a role in the tonic modulation of sensorimotor gating.     

Cannabidiol reverses MK-801-induced disruption of prepulse inhibition in mice.

Cannabidiol, a nonpsychoactive constituent of the Cannabis sativa plant, has been reported to act as an agonist of the vanilloid 1 channel in the transient receptor potential family (TRPV1) and also to inhibit the hydrolysis and cellular uptake of the endogenous cannabinoid anandamide. Cannabidiol has also been reported to have potential as an antipsychotic. We investigated the effect of cannabidiol on sensorimotor gating deficits in mice induced by the noncompetitive NMDA receptor antagonist, MK-801. Sensorimotor gating is deficient in psychotic disorders such as schizophrenia and may be reliably measured by prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the startle response in rodents and humans. MK-801 (0.3-1 mg/kg i.p.) dose dependently disrupted PPI while cannabidiol (1-15 mg/kg i.p.), when administered with vehicle, had no effect on PPI. Cannabidiol (5 mg/kg i.p.) successfully reversed disruptions in PPI induced by MK-801 (1 mg/kg i.p.), as did the atypical antipsychotic clozapine (4 mg/kg i.p.). Pretreatment with capsazepine (20 mg/kg i.p.) prevented the reversal of MK-801-induced disruption of PPI by cannabidiol, providing preliminary evidence that TRPV1 receptors are involved in the reversal of MK-801-induced sensorimotor gating deficits by cannabidiol.     

Co-administration of 5-HT6 receptor antagonists with clozapine, risperidone, and a 5-HT2A receptor antagonist: effects on prepulse inhibition in rats

Rationale

Some novel antipsychotics manifest antagonistic activity at serotonin-6 receptors; however, little is known about the role of 5-HT6 receptors in ameliorating sensory gating deficits.

Objective

We evaluated the effects of the combined administration of the 5-HT6 receptor antagonist SB 271046 with clozapine and haloperidol, as well as the co-administration of SB 271046 or SB 399885 with risperidone and the 5-HT2A antagonist M100907, to overcome the deficits induced by MK-801 in the prepulse inhibition (PPI) test.

Results

MK-801 (0.1 mg/kg) produced reliable PPI deficits. Administration of SB 271046 (6 and 9 mg/kg), SB 399885 (3 and 6 mg/kg), clozapine (2.5 mg/kg), haloperidol (0.1 and 0.2 mg/kg), risperidone (0.25–1 mg/kg), and M100907 (0.5 and 1 mg/kg) did not affect the MK-801-induced deficits, but the administration of clozapine (5 mg/kg) did reverse the effects of MK-801. In MK-801-treated rats, the co-administration of inactive doses of clozapine (2.5 mg/kg) and SB 271046 (6 mg/kg) reversed the PPI impairments compared to animals that were administered inactive doses of either clozapine or SB 271046 alone. Co-administration of risperidone (1 mg/kg) or M100907 (0.5 mg/kg) with SB 271046 (6 mg/kg) or SB 399885 (3 mg/kg) also attenuated the MK-801-induced PPI deficits. In contrast, joint administration of haloperidol and SB 271046 had no effect on the PPI deficit.

Conclusion

The present results suggest that the 5-HT6 receptors may play adjunctive roles in antipsychotic drug action, and that the combination of 5-HT2A and 5-HT6 antagonism may represent an important element in the pharmacological profile of antipsychotic drugs.     

Antagonism of phencyclidine-induced deficits in prepulse inhibition by the putative atypical antipsychotic olanzapine

Prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the startle reflex provides an operational measure of sensorimotor gating. Deficits in PPI are observed in schizophrenia patients and can be modelled in animals by administration of noncompetitive NMDA antagonists such as phencyclidine (PCP) or dizocilpine (MK-801). Previous studies indicate that the atypical antipsychotic clozapine restores PPI in PCP-treated animals while the typical antipsychotic haloperidol does not. Olanzapine (LY170053) is a novel putative atypical antipsychotic that shares many pharmacological and behavioral properties with clozapine. The present study assessed the ability of olanzapine (0, 1.25, 2.5, 5.0 or 10.0 mg/kg) to antagonize deficits in PPI produced by PCP (1.5 mg/kg) and dizocilpine (0.1 mg/kg). At the two highest doses, olanzapine significantly increased PPI in PCP- and dizocilpine-treated animals without affecting PPI or baseline startle reactivity by itself. These results support the notion that olanzapine is functionally similar to clozapine and may have utility as an atypical antipsychotic agent.     

Effects of phencyclidine and phencyclidine biologs on sensorimotor gating in the rat

Prepulse inhibition of the startle response occurs when a weak prestimulus precedes a startling stimulus and decreases the resulting reflex response. Prepulse inhibition provides a measure of sensorimotor gating that is readily assessed in humans and animals. As in event-related-potential models of sensory gating, prepulse inhibition is decreased in schizophrenic patients. In the present study, prepulse inhibition was measured in rats following injections of the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonists phencyclidine, ketamine, and (+)-5-methyl-10,11-dihydro-5H-dibenzo(a,d)-cyclohepten-5,10-imine (MK-801). Startle was elicited by two different noise intensities or by air-puffs (tactile) and was inhibited by weak acoustic prepulse stimuli presented 100 msec before the startle stimuli. The different eliciting stimuli produced different levels of startle in both control and drug-treated animals, startle being increased by phencyclidine and MK-801. Both phencyclidine (3.0 to 10.0 mg/kg) and MK-801 (0.3 to 1.0 mg/kg) significantly reduced the amount of acoustic prepulse inhibition whereas ketamine did not. These results demonstrate that putative noncompetitive NMDA antagonists disrupt sensorimotor gating in rats and suggest that their effects may provide a model of the deficits in sensory gating exhibited by schizophrenic patients.     

(+/-) Ketamine-induced prepulse inhibition deficits of an acoustic startle response in rats are not reversed by antipsychotics

Prepulse inhibition (PPI) is the reduction in the startle response caused by a low intensity non-startling stimulus (the prepulse) which is presented shortly before the startle stimulus and is an operational measure of sensorimotor gating. PPI is impaired in psychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia. Ketamine, a non-competitive N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist has been shown to induce schizophrenia-like behavioural changes in humans and PPI deficits in rats, which can be reversed by antipsychotics. Thus, ketamine-induced PPI deficits in rats may provide a translational model of schizophrenia. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of antipsychotic drugs and drugs known to alter the glutamate system upon ketamine-induced PPI deficits in rats. Rats were habituated to the PPI procedure [randomized trials of either pulse alone (110 dB/50 ms) or prepulse + pulse (80 dB/10 ms)]. Animals were assigned to pre-treatments based on the level of PPI on the last habituation test and balanced across startle chambers. Ketamine (1-10 mg/kg s.c; 15 min ptt) increased startle amplitude and induced PPI deficits at 6 and 10 mg/kg. PPI deficits induced by ketamine at 6 mg/kg were not attenuated by clozapine (2.5-10 mg/kg s.c.; 60 min ptt), risperidone (0.1-1 mg/kg i.p.; 60 min ptt), haloperidol (0.1-1 mg/kg i.p.; 60 min ptt), lamotrigine (3-30 mg/kg p.o.; 60 min ptt), or SB-271046-A (5-20 mg/kg p.o.; 2 hour ptt) nor potentiated by 2-methyl-6-(phenylethynyl)-pyridine (3-10 mg/kg i.p.; 30 min ptt). These results suggest that under these test conditions ketamine-induced PPI deficits in rats is relatively insensitive and does not represent a translational model for drug discovery in schizophrenia.     

Chronic treatment with haloperidol diminishes the phencyclidine-induced sensorimotor gating deficit in rats

Prepulse inhibition is a model in which a weak subthreshold stimulus (prepulse), presented to an individual before a strong stimulus (pulse), inhibits a startle response to the latter. A deficit of prepulse inhibition induced by dopaminomimetics and antagonists of NMDA receptors has been suggested as an animal model of the sensorimotor deficit in schizophrenia. The aim of the present study was to examine the effect of chronic treatment with the classic neuroleptic haloperidol on the disruption of prepulse inhibition induced by the uncompetitive antagonist of NMDA receptors phencyclidine (PCP, 5mg/kg sc). Haloperidol in a dose of 1mg/kg/day was given to rats in drinking water for 3 months. The PCP-induced reduction in prepulse inhibition was not reversed by short-term (4-day) haloperidol administration. In contrast, long-term treatment with haloperidol (6 weeks or 3 months) diminished the PCP-induced effect. The present study suggests that the improvement in sensorimotor gating in the PCP model in rats by prolonged treatment with haloperidol may reflect its antipsychotic action. Received: 13 October 1997 / Accepted: 14 January 1998     

Time course of the attenuation effect of repeated antipsychotic treatment on prepulse inhibition disruption induced by repeated phencyclidine treatment

Antagonism of prepulse inhibition (PPI) deficits produced by psychotomimetic drugs has been widely used as an effective tool for the study of the mechanisms of antipsychotic action and identifying potential antipsychotic drugs. Many studies have relied on the acute effect of a single administration of antipsychotics, whereas patients with schizophrenia are treated chronically with antipsychotic drugs. The clinical relevance of acute antipsychotic effect in this model is still an open question. In this study, we investigated the time course of repeated antipsychotic treatment on persistent PPI deficit induced by repeated phencyclidine (PCP) treatment. After a baseline test with saline, male Sprague-Dawley rats were repeatedly injected with either vehicle, haloperidol (0.05 mg/kg), clozapine (5.0 or 10.0 mg/kg), olanzapine (2.0 mg/kg), risperidone (1.0 mg/kg) or quetiapine (10 mg/kg), followed by PCP (1.5 mg/kg, sc) and tested for PPI once daily for 6 consecutive days. A single injection of PCP disrupted PPI and this effect was maintained with repeated PCP injections throughout the testing period. Acute clozapine, but not other antipsychotic drugs, attenuated acute PCP-induced PPI disruption at both tested doses. With repeated treatment, clozapine and quetiapine maintained their attenuation, while risperidone enhanced its effect with a significant reduction of PCP-induced disruption toward the end of treatment period. In contrast, repeated haloperidol and olanzapine treatments were ineffective. The PPI effects of these drugs were more conspicuous at a higher prepulse level (e.g. 82 dB) and were dissociable from their effects on startle response and general activity. Overall, the repeated PCP-PPI model appears to be a useful model for the study of the time-dependent antipsychotic effect, and may help identify potential treatments that have a quicker onset of action than current antipsychotics.     

Effects of cannabinoid receptor ligands on psychosis-relevant behavior models in the rat

Abstract Rationale. Marijuana is known to have psychotropic effects in humans. In this study, we used rat models of sensorimotor gating, hyperactivity and stereotypy to explore whether CB₁ receptor stimulation or blockade induces behavioral changes consistent with psychotomimetic or antipsychotic agents, respectively. Objectives. We determined whether (a) the cannabinoid agonist CP 55940 decreased pre-pulse inhibition (PPI) as might be expected from a psychotomimetic agent, and (b) the selective CB₁ receptor antagonist, SR 141716A, had any effect on PPI on its own or following disruptions by psychotomimetic agents. In addition, we investigated the effects of SR 141716A on elevated levels of hyperactivity and stereotypy elicited by d-amphetamine. Methods. These studies were conducted in rats using standard methodologies for determination of PPI following acoustic stimuli, and d-amphetamine-induced hyperactivity and stereotypies. Results. Decreased startle responses to 120 dB stimuli were observed in rats treated with CP 55940 (0.1 mg/kg IP) in the absence and presence of a 73 dB pre-pulse. These effects were reversed by SR 141716A (5 and 10 mg/kg, respectively). SR 141716A (0.1, 5, 10 mg/kg) had no effect on PPI on its own or following disruptions by apomorphine, d-amphetamine or MK-801. Conversely, in separate experiments different antipsychotic agents reversed disruptions in PPI induced by d-amphetamine (haloperidol), apomorphine (haloperidol or clozapine) or MK-801 (clozapine or olanzapine). In addition, unlike haloperidol, SR 141716A (5 mg/kg) did not reverse d-amphetamine-mediated increases in hyperactivity or stereotypy. Conclusions. The CP 55940-mediated decreases in startle amplitude confound assessment of the effects of CB₁ receptor activation on PPI. The failure of SR 141716A to reverse disruptions in PPI, hyperactivity or stereotypy induced by non-cannabinoid psychotomimetic agents suggests that blockade of the CB₁ receptor on its own is not sufficient for antipsychotic therapy. Electronic Publication     

The effects of subchronic haloperidol on intact and dizocilpine-disrupted sensorimotor gating

Rationale: Reversal of deficits in prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the startle reflex in rats is considered a preclinical screen for potential antipsychotics. Whereas acutely administered antipsychotics consistently reverse apomorphine-induced deficits in PPI, some antipsychotics, including haloperidol, are unable to reverse deficits in PPI produced by non-competitive NMDA antagonists such as phencyclidine or dizocilpine (MK-801). Acute administration of antipsychotics tends to facilitate baseline PPI. However, the effect is generally not large enough in magnitude nor reliable enough to be considered a useful preclinical screen for antipsychotic activity. Objective: Because the clinical effects of antipsychotics typically require subchronic administration, this study tested the hypothesis that reversal of NMDA antagonist-induced deficits in PPI by antipsychotics require subchronic administration. A second aim of this study was to determine if subchronic administration of an antipsychotic produces a more potent facilitation of baseline PPI than acute administration. Methods: Rats received a subcutaneous injection of 0, 0.025, 0.1 or 0.5 mg/kg haloperidol for 16 consecutive days. On day 16, half the rats in each haloperidol dose group received a second subcutaneous injection consisting of either dizocilpine (0.1 mg/kg) or saline. Results: None of the haloperidol doses tested had a significant effect on baseline PPI. The 0.1 mg/kg dose of haloperidol diminished but did not completely reverse dizocilpine-induced disruption of PPI. The other doses had no significant effect. Conclusions: These results suggest that time course factors may partially modify the effects of haloperidol on dizocilpine-induced disruption of PPI but not its effect on baseline PPI. Received: 4 December 1998 / Final version: 19 April 1999     

Systemic administration of MK-801 produces an abnormally persistent latent inhibition which is reversed by clozapine but not haloperidol

Abstract Rationale. Latent inhibition (LI) refers to retarded conditioning to a stimulus as a consequence of its inconsequential pre-exposure, and disrupted LI in the rat is considered to model an attentional deficit in schizophrenia. Blockade of NMDA receptor transmission, which produces behavioral effects potentially relevant to schizophrenic symptomatology in several animal models, has been reported to spare LI. Objectives. To show that systemic administration of the non-competitive NMDA antagonist MK-801 will lead to an abnormally persistent LI which will emerge under conditions that disrupt LI in controls, and that this will be reversed by the atypical neuroleptic clozapine but not by the typical neuroleptic haloperidol, as found for other NMDA antagonist-induced models. Methods. LI was measured in a thirst-motivated conditioned emotional response (CER) procedure by comparing suppression of drinking in response to a tone in rats which previously received 0 (non-pre-exposed) or 40 tone exposures (pre-exposed) followed by two (experiment 1) or five (experiments 2–5) tone – foot shock pairings. Results. MK-801 at doses of 0.1 and 0.2 mg/kg reduced conditioned suppression while no effect on suppression was seen at the 0.05 mg/kg dose. At the latter dose, intact LI was seen with parameters that produced LI in controls (40 pre-exposures and two conditioning trials). Raising the number of conditioning trials to five disrupted LI in control rats, but MK-801-treated rats continued to show LI, and this abnormally persistent LI was due to the action of MK-801 in the conditioning stage. MK-801-induced LI perseveration was unaffected by both haloperidol (0.1 mg/kg) and clozapine (5 mg/kg) administered in conditioning, and was reversed by clozapine but not by haloperidol administered in pre-exposure. Conclusion. MK-801-induced perseveration of LI is consistent with other reports of perseverative behaviors, suggested to be particularly relevant to negative symptoms of schizophrenia, following NMDA receptor blockade. We suggest that LI perseveration may model impaired attentional set shifting associated with negative symptoms of schizophrenia. Moreover, the finding that the action of MK-801 on LI and the action of clozapine are exerted in different stages of the LI procedure suggests that the MK-801-based LI model may provide a unique screening tool for the identification of novel antipsychotic compounds, whereby the schizophrenia-mimicking LI abnormality is drug-induced, but the detection of the antipsychotic action is not dependent on the mechanism of action of the pro-psychotic drug. Electronic Publication     

Dopaminergic stimulation disrupts sensorimotor gating in the rat

Prepulse inhibition is a cross-species phenomenon in which reflex responses to discrete sensory events are modified by weak prestimulation. In experiments designed to investigate the neuropharmacological mechanism of this form of information processing, and its relevance to schizophrenic psychopathology, apomorphine (0.125–4.0 mg/kg) and d-amphetamine (0.5–4.0 mg/kg) were administered to rats in an attempt to modify prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle response. Rats were presented with 40 ms, 118 dB[A] acoustic pulses which were intermittently preceded by a weak 80 dB[A] acoustic prepulse. Both apomorphine and d-amphetamine induced a significant loss of prepulse inhibition, as reflected by increased pulse-preceded-by-prepulse versus pulse-alone startle magnitudes. Haloperidol (0.1 mg/kg), a specific D2 dopamine receptor antagonist, prevented the effects of 2.0 mg/kg apomorphine on prepulse inhibition, while having little effect by itself. An additional study investigated the effects of chronic intermittent administration of 2.5 mg/kg d-amphetamine. Rats given amphetamine for 8 consecutive days also displayed a loss of prepulse inhibition, with no evidence of tolerance. Finally, prepulse inhibition was examined under high- and low-intensity startle stimulus conditions; apomorphine (1.0 mg/kg) induced a loss of prepulse inhibition under both intensity conditions in approximately equal proportion. The results of these studies suggest a connection between sensorimotor gating, as measured by prepulse inhibition, and dopaminergic overactivity, supporting suggestions that information processing deficits in schizophrenia may be responsible for some psychotic symptoms and their effective treatment by antipsychotic D2 dopamine antagonists.     

Apomorphine-induced disruption of prepulse inhibition that can be normalised by systemic haloperidol is insensitive to clozapine pretreatment

Rationale Prepulse inhibition (PPI) of startle refers to the phenomenon in which a weak prepulse attenuates the startle response to a succeeding intense stimulus. PPI can be disrupted by systemic apomorphine in animals, and reduced PPI has been consistently reported in schizophrenia patients. The ability of the atypical antipsychotic clozapine to reverse apomorphine-induced PPI deficit has been demonstrated in the rat, but has not yet been tested in the mouse. The present study was designed to fill this gap.Objective and results We investigated the efficacy of clozapine in reversing apomorphine-induced (2.0 or 2.5 mg/kg, SC) PPI deficit in C57BL6 mice. Clozapine failed to restore PPI disruption in apomorphine-treated mice in two independent laboratories across two dose ranges (1–3 mg/kg, IP, or 3–30 mg/kg, PO), whereas the typical antipsychotic haloperidol (1 mg/kg,IP) completely normalised PPI performance.Conclusions Unlike the rat, apomorphine-induced PPI disruption in mice might be instrumental in distinguishing between typical and atypical antipsychotic drugs. This also lends further support to the suggestion that the neuropharmacology of PPI is not identical in the two rodent species.     

The involvement of sigma and phencyclidine receptors in the action of antipsychotic drugs.

An atypical antipsychotic drug clozapine and a selective sigma antagonist BMY 14802 were significantly less effective in the behavioural experiments (against apomorphine, d-amphetamine and MK-801), as well in the radioligand binding studies against 3H-spiperone (dopamine2-receptors) and 3H-haloperidol (sigma receptors) in the rat brain, as compared to a typical antipsychotic compound haloperidol. Contrary to haloperidol and BMY 14802, clozapine was a relatively selective antagonist of MK-801-induced motor excitation in the mouse. A nearly 3-fold lower dose of clozapine was needed to block the effect of MK-801 (6.4 mumol/kg) as compared to the action of amphetamine (17 mumol/kg). Haloperidol and clozapine, but not BMY 14802, antagonized apomorphine-induced aggressiveness in the rat. After long-term treatment (for 15 days) with BMY 14802 (10 mg/kg daily), haloperidol (0.5 mg/kg daily) and clozapine (10 mg/kg daily) the motor depressant effect of apomorphine (0.15 mg/kg) was reversed. Chronic haloperidol treatment, but not administration of BMY 14802 and clozapine, increased the number of dopamine2-receptors in the rat brain. BMY 14802 caused upregulation of sigma receptors in frontal cortex, whereas haloperidol induced the opposite change in cerebellum. Repeated treatment with clozapine significantly augmented the motor stimulating effect of MK-801 in rats. Simultaneously with a behavioural change the density of 3H-TCP binding sites in the rat forebrain was elevated after long-term treatment with clozapine, probably indicating the involvement of PCP binding sites at NMDA channel in the action of clozapine.     

The atypical antipsychotic,remoxipride, blocks phencyclidine-induced disruption of prepulse inhibition in the rat

The effect of various typical (haloperidol) and atypical (clozapine, raclopride, remoxipride) antipsychotics on phencyclidine (PCP)-induced disruption of sensorimotor gating was tested in rats using an acoustic startle paradigm. Clozapine (4–40 µmol/kg), haloperidol (1–5 µmol/kg) and raclopride (1–12 µmol/kg) failed to reverse PCP-induced disruption of prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the acoustic startle response. In contrast, remoxipride (12–60 µmol/kg) caused a dose-dependent block of this effect. PCP-induced disruption of PPI is a widely accepted animal model of a corresponding behavioural deficit observed in schizophrenia although little evidence has been presented that it is in fact sensitive to antipsychotic agents. The present results indicate that remoxipride behaves in a unique way in this model compared to clozapine, haloperidol and raclopride.     

The Involvement of Sigma and Phencyclidine Receptors in the Action of Antipsychotic Drugs

Abstract: An atypical antipsychotic drug clozapine and a selective sigma antagonist BMY 14802 were significantly less effective in the behavioural experiments (against apomorphine, d-amphetamine and MK-801), as well in the radioligand binding studies against ³H-spiperone (dopamine₂-receptors) and ³H-haloperidol (sigma receptors) in the rat brain, as compared to a typical antipsychotic compound haloperidol. Contrary to haloperidol and BMY 14802, clozapine was a relatively selective antagonist of MK-801-induced motor excitation in the mouse. A nearly 3-fold lower dose of clozapine was needed to block the effect of MK-801 (6.4 μmol/kg) as compared to the action of amphetamine (17 μmol/kg). Haloperidol and clozapine, but not BMY 14802, antagonized apomorphine-induced aggressiveness in the rat. After long-term treatment (for 15 days) with BMY 14802 (10 mg/kg daily), haloperidol (0.5 mg/kg daily) and clozapine (10 mg/kg daily) the motor depressant effect of apomorphine (0.15 mg/kg) was reversed. Chronic haloperidol treatment, but not administration of BMY 14802 and clozapine, increased the number of dopamine₂-receptors in the rat brain. BMY 14802 caused upregulation of sigma receptors in frontal cortex, whereas haloperidol induced the opposite change in cerebellum. Repeated treatment with clozapine significantly augmented the motor stimulating effect of MK-801 in rats. Simultaneously with a behavioural change the density of ³H-TCP binding sites in the rat forebrain was elevated after long-term treatment with clozapine, probably indicating the involvement of PCP binding sites at NMDA channel in the action of clozapine.     

Effects of haloperidol and clozapine on sensorimotor gating deficits induced by 5-hydroxytryptamine depletion in the brain

Evidence is increasing for a role of brain 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) systems in schizophrenia. We previously showed that brain 5-HT depletion causes disruption of prepulse inhibition, a measure of sensorimotor gating that is deficient in schizophrenia. Antipsychotic treatment has been reported to reverse these deficits in patients with schizophrenia. The present study was designed to investigate the ability of antipsychotic drugs to reverse prepulse inhibition deficits caused by lesions of the brain 5-HT system in rats. In male Sprague-Dawley rats, selected parts of the brain 5-HT systems were lesioned by micro-injection of the 5-HT neurotoxin 5,7-dihydroxytryptamine into the dorsal raphe nucleus (DRN) or median raphe nucleus (MRN). The effects of antipsychotic drugs on lesion-induced changes in prepulse inhibition were examined 2 weeks after the surgery. There was significant disruption of prepulse inhibition in the MRN-lesioned group compared to sham-operated controls. This deficiency in prepulse inhibition was restored by clozapine (1 and 5 mg kg(-1)) treatment, and by treatment with a relatively high dose of haloperidol (0.25 mg kg(-1)). There was no significant effect of the DRN lesions on prepulse inhibition compared with sham-operated controls. These results indicate that 5-HT depletion in MRN-innervated brain structures leads to disruption of prepulse inhibition. Treatment with both antipsychotic drugs, haloperidol and clozapine, significantly increased prepulse inhibition in these animals back to the level seen in sham-operated controls. The present findings highlight the importance of the 5-HT systems in cognitive models of schizophrenia.