Survival in patients with permanent pacemakers.

Atrioventricular block I has a benign natural course, and permanent pacing is not warranted. Second-degree AV block, including both type I and type II, can have an ominous course, especially in older patients with underlying heart disease. One study claims that the prognosis in patients with second-degree AV block, irrespective of type, is improved by permanent pacing. In spite of lack of controlled studies it has been convincingly shown that VVI pacing prolongs life in patients with high-grade AV block. Two studies suggest that atrial synchronous pacing in patients with congestive heart failure and high-grade AV block might improve their survival. Studies comparing survival with different pacing modes in patients with sinus node disease support the hypothesis that physiologic pacing can improve survival. Prophylactic pacemaker implantation even in symptomatic patients with chronic bifascicular block does not seem to protect them from sudden death.     

Development of sinus node disease in patients with AV block: implications for single lead VDD pacing

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the incidence of sinus node disease after pacemaker implantation for exclusive atrioventricular (AV) block. DESIGN: 441 patients were followed after VDD (n = 219) or DDD pacemaker (n = 222) implantation for AV block over a mean period of 37 months. Sinus node disease and atrial arrhythmias had been excluded by Holter monitoring and treadmill exercise preoperatively in 286 patients (group A). In 155 patients with complete AV block, a sinus rate above 70 beats/min was required for inclusion in the study (group B). Holter monitoring and treadmill exercise were performed two weeks, three months, and every six months after implantation. Sinus bradycardia below 40 beats/min, sinoatrial block, sinus arrest, or subnormal increase of heart rate during treadmill exercise were defined as sinus node dysfunction. RESULTS: Cumulative incidence of sinus node disease was 0.65% per year without differences between groups. Clinical indicators of sinus node dysfunction were sinus bradycardia below 40 beats/min in six patients (1.4%), intermittent sinoatrial block in two (0.5%), and chronotropic incompetence in five patients (1.1%). Only one of these patients (0.2%) was symptomatic. Cumulative incidence of atrial fibrillation was 2.0% per year, independent of the method used for the assessment of sinus node function and of the implanted device. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing pacemaker implantation for isolated AV block, sinus node syndrome rarely occurs during follow up. Thus single lead VDD pacing can safely be performed in these patients.     

Pacing therapy in the elderly

Bradycardia due to sinus node dysfunction and atrioventricular block is more commonly observed in the elderly. Aging is associated with progressive fibrosis in both the sinus node and atrioventricular conduction system (AV node, His bundle, right and left bundles). In the absence of reversible causes implantation of a permanent pacemaker is often required in the patient with symptomatic bradycardia. For elderly patients with sinus node dysfunction, pacing modes that preserve atrioventricular synchrony are associated with a reduced incidence of atrial fibrillation and improved quality of life. For patients with atrioventricular block, the importance of preserving atrioventricular synchrony in the elderly is controversial and is currently being evaluated.     

AAI pacing mode: When is it indicated and how should it be achieved?

AAI pacing offers better hemodynamic characterstics than dual-chamber pacing and is the optimal mode for patents with sick sinus syndrome without AV conduction disorders. AAI pacing may be achieved by single-chamber atrial, by programming a dual-chamber pacemaker to the AAI mode, or by programming a dual-chamber pacemaker to DDD mode with a long AV delay. The annual incidence of AV block development in patients with sick sinus syndrome is low, probably 1-5%, but there is no method of detecting patients immune to future development of AV block. Chronotropic is often present in patients with sick sinus but the value of additional rate response is not yet established. Our recommendations for the choice of the method of pacing are discussed.     

Prevalence of atrial fibrillation and stroke in paced patients without prior atrial fibrillation: A prospective study

Background: Several reports suggest that the incidence of stroke and atrial fibrillation is reduced in patients receiving physiologic pacemakers, compared with patients receiving a ventricular pacemaker. Hypothesis: The study was undertaken to address the impact of different pacing modalities on the incidence of stroke and atrial fibrillation. Methods: We prospectively analyzed 210 consecutive patients. Those with previous episodes of cerebral ischemia and/ or atrial fibrillation were excluded from the study. The study population included 100 patients paced for total atrioventricular (AV) block or second-degree AV block (type II Mobitz) and 110 patients paced for sick sinus syndrome (SSS). The pacing mode was randomized. All patients underwent a brain computed tomography (CT) scan at the date of enrollment and after 1 and 2 years. Patients were followed for 2 years, and the incidence of atrial fibrillation and stroke was evaluated. Results: The incidence of atrial fibrillation was 10% at 1 year and 11% at 2 years. Comparing the different pacing modalities, we reported an increase in the incidence of atrial fibrillation in patients receiving ventricular pacing (p<0.05). On the other hand, no difference was found between patients paced for AV block and those paced for SSS. At the end of follow-up, we reported 29 cases of cerebral ischemia: 9 patients had AV block while 20 had SSS (p<0.05). Comparing the different pacing modalities, there was an increase in the incidence of stroke in patients receiving ventricular pacing (p< 0.05). Conclusion: There was an increase in the incidence of stroke and atrial fibrillation in patients with ventricular pacing.     

Prevalence, circumstances, mechanisms, and risk stratification of sudden cardiac death in unipolar single-chamber ventricular pacing.

BACKGROUND. Permanent cardiac pacing is well established for the improvement of prognosis and quality of life in patients with severe bradycardia. However, sudden cardiac death still remains an unresolved problem, as it occurs in approximately 20-30% of paced patients. This 2-year follow-up study was directed at prospectively assessing prevalence, circumstances, and mechanisms of sudden death in 2,021 permanently paced patients. METHODS AND RESULTS. During the observation period, 220 patients (11%) died (mean pacing interval, 50.5 +/- 7 months). Lethal cerebrovascular events in 66 of 220 patients (30%) and sudden death in 49 of 220 patients (23%) were the two most frequently reported modes of death. Nonsudden (first year, 20%; subsequent years, 6.9%; p less than 0.01) and sudden death mortality rate (4% versus 1.8%, p less than 0.05) were highest during the first year. Mortality was unrelated to the patient's activity status at the time of death. Sudden cardiac death occurred more often in male patients (increased risk, 1.7 versus female patients; p less than 0.001) and patients younger than 60 years of age (5.2 versus patients older than 60 years, p less than 0.001). Patients with severe bradycardia (sudden death rate, 28%), severe atrioventricular block (25%), or atrial fibrillation with low ventricular rate (25%) before pacemaker implantation were more likely to suffer from sudden cardiac death than patients with previous syncopal attacks (sudden death rate, 15%) or sick sinus syndrome (17%). The highest incidence of sudden death was observed in patients with bifascicular and trifascicular bundle branch block. In this group, 35% of patients died suddenly during the follow-up period compared with 18% of patients without bundle branch block. In a subsequent study in 90 consecutive patients with various types of bundle branch block, undersensing of up to 13% of ectopic ventricular beats occurred in patients with bifascicular block. Pacing-induced tachyarrhythmias and ventricular fibrillation were documented in 10% of undersensed ectopic ventricular beats as well as in the setting of atrial fibrillation associated with ventricular arrhythmias. CONCLUSIONS. Young age, male sex, and a severely diseased heart indicated by the presence of bifascicular and trifascicular bundle branch block are the strongest predictive clinical parameters for sudden cardiac death, especially in the first year after pacemaker implantation.     

Single-pass lead VDD pacing system in children and adolescents: report of twenty-four patients

The dual-chamber pacing systems allow for AV synchrony, but generally require the placement of two separate transvenous leads. Single-lead atrioventricular synchronous pacing system (VDD) using single-pass leads has been accepted as therapeutic alternative for atrioventricular block with normal sinus node function. The aim of this study is to evaluate clinical performance of single-pass lead VDD pacing systems in 24 consecutive patients in a ten-year period. The study group includes 17 (70.8%) male and 7 (28.8%) female patients.The mean age and mean weight during pacemaker implantation was 10.4 +/- 3.8 years (4-17 years) and 30 +/- I I kg (13.5-55 kg), respectively. The patients have been followed for 7-84 months (median 42 months). The percentage of atrial sensing-ventricular pacing changed from 75 to 99.9% at the last control. During the follow-up period, pacing mode was changed to VVIR due to complete loss of AV synchrony in five patients (21%). Four of them had underlying cardiac disease. In these patients loss of AV synchrony might be related to cardiac enlargement/abnormal cardiac anatomy or small atrial dipole-ventricular tip length. Despite the loss of AV synchrony in post surgical AV block or dilated cardiomyopathy, single-lead VDD pacing systems can be successfully used in children with complete AV block and normal sinus node function. Patients and lead selection should be taken into consideration for the maintenance of AV synchrony.     

Pre-implant determinants of adequate long-term function of single lead VDD pacemakers.

AIMS: An inherent limitation of single lead VDD pacing is the inability to stimulate the atria. Reprogramming and upgrading the pacemaker system may be required when sinus node dysfunction, atrial undersensing, or atrial fibrillation develop. We evaluated whether routine clinical information is sufficient to select patients to benefit in long-term from VDD pacing. METHODS AND RESULTS: We collected data on 12-lead and monitored electrocardiograms and routine clinical information at implantation of a VDD pacing system in 350 consecutive patients with grade II or III atrioventricular conduction block. The age at implantation was 74.5 +/- 8.0 years, and the follow-up lasted 1.5 +/- 1.5 years. The cumulative maintenance of VDD pacing mode was 91.%. Loss of VDD mode was due to permanent atrial fibrillation in 16 (4.6%), sinus node dysfunction in six (1.7%). atrial undersensing in 11 (3.1%). Chronic atrial fibrillation developed in 23% of patients who had heart enlargement in chest x-ray and a history of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation or flutter. A criterion of normal sinus rate at implantation sufficiently predicted adequate sinus node function. Poor atrial sensing was not predicted by pre-implant characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: According to our data, adequate sinus-driven atrial rate and no history of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and cardiac enlargement predict maintenance of the VDD pacing mode in elderly patients treated for heart block. Routine information available at implantation is sufficient to guide acceptance of single lead VDD pacing therapy.     

Comparative survival following permanent ventricular and dual-chamber pacing for patients with chronic symptomatic sinus node dysfunction with and without congestive heart failure

To determine whether survival following permanent ventricular demand pacing differs from survival following permanent dual-chamber pacing in patients with symptomatic sinus node dysfunction (unexplained sinus bradycardia, subsidiary rhythms, sinus arrest, sinoatrial block, or the bradycardia/tachycardia syndrome), we followed 79 patients who received a VVI pacemaker (group 1) and 49 patients who received a DVI or DDD pacemaker (group 2) for 1 to 5 years. There was no significant difference in sex distribution, mean age, or the incidence of coronary heart disease, hypertension, valvular heart disease, diabetes mellitus, stroke, or renal failure between groups 1 and 2. Overall, the predicted cumulative survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 89%, 82%, and 74%, respectively, for group 1 and 94%, 86%, and 78%, respectively, for group 2. In patients with preexistent congestive heart failure (CHF), predicted cumulative survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 78%, 69%, and 57%, respectively, for group 1 (n = 23) and 90%, 83%, and 75%, respectively, for group 2 (n = 16). Five-year predicted cumulative survival was significantly lower in group 1 patients with CHF than in group 2 patients with CHF (p less than 0.03). There was no significant difference in 5-year cumulative survival rates between groups 1 and 2 in patients without CHF. The results suggest that permanent dual-chamber pacing enhances survival to a greater extent than permanent ventricular demand pacing in patients with chronic symptomatic sinus node dysfunction and CHF.     

Permanent and temporary pacemaker implantation after orthotopic heart transplantation

PURPOSE:To determine the indication for and incidence and evolution of temporary and permanent pacemaker implantation in cardiac transplant recipients. METHODS: A retrospective review of 114 patients who underwent orthotopic heart transplantation InCor (Heart Institute USP BR) between March 1985 and May 1993. We studied the incidence of and indication for temporary pacing, the relationship between pacing and rejection, the need for pemanent pacing and the clinical follow-up. RESULTS: Fourteen of 114 (12%)heart transplant recipients required temporary pacing and 4 of 114 (3.5%) patients required permanent pacing. The indication for temporary pacing was sinus node dysfunction in 11 patients (78.5%) and atrioventricular (AV) block in 3 patients (21.4%). The indication for permanent pacemaker implantation was sinus node dysfunction in 3 patients (75%) and atrioventricular (AV) block in 1 patient (25%). We observed rejection in 3 patients (21.4%) who required temporary pacing and in 2 patients (50%) who required permanent pacing. The previous use of amiodarone was observed in 10 patients (71.4%) with temporary pacing. Seven of the 14 patients (50%) died during follow-up. CONCLUSION: Sinus node dysfunction was the principal indication for temporary and permanent pacemaker implantation in cardiac transplant recipients. The need for pacing was related to worse prognosis after cardiac transplantation.     

Long-term clinical performance of AAI pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome: a comparison with dual-chamber pacing.

AIMS: In this clinical study, we compared two groups of age-matched patients, AAI and DDD, to evaluate the clinical benefits of AAI pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome (SSS) and normal atrioventricular (AV) conduction. METHODS AND RESULTS: Ninety-five patients with SSS implanted with AAI pacemakers were compared with 101 SSS patients implanted with DDD pacemakers. Mortality, chronic atrial fibrillation, lead survival rates, and reoperation rates were compared by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Eight AAI devices were switched to DDD due to high-degree (grade 2-3) AV block. The incidence of high-degree AV block was 1.104%/year, with a freedom rate of 88.6% at 10 years. There were no significant differences between the two groups in survival rates (87.8% in AAI vs. 93.4% in DDD at 10 years), freedom from atrial fibrillation (93.6% vs. 90.6%), or freedom from reoperation (71.3% vs. 76.3%). On the other hand, lead failure was twice as frequent in the DDD group than in the AAI group (relative risk=2.045, P=0.0382). CONCLUSION: AAI pacing, a simple system using a single lead and single-chamber pacemaker, can achieve a clinical outcome similar to that of the DDD mode in patients with SSS and normal AV conduction.     

Long-term management of bradyarrhythmias following open heart surgery: surgical A-V block and sick sinus syndrome after surgery for secundum atrial septal defects treated with permanent cardiac pacing

Postoperative clinical findings from 25 patients with surgical A-V block and 12 with SSS following surgery for ASD who received permanent pacemakers were analyzed in order to consider the long-term management of postoperative bradyarrhythmias. Surgical A-V block: Episodes of Adams-Stokes were observed in 11/25 patients before pacemaker implantation, and in 6 of these (55%) the onset of episodes occurred more than a year after open heart surgery. Of 8 cases for which ECG's during Adams-Stokes were available, 2 had bifascicular or trifascicular block which progressed to complete A-V block below the His bundle. The 6 others (75%) had ventricular tachycardia or ventricular flutter-fibrillation during Adams-Stokes. 2 of these had blocks above the His bundle. 4/25 had improvement of complete A-V block within a month. Following pacemaker implantation, 3 died of heart failure and 3 of sudden death. 5 year survival was 70%. Therefore, surgical A-V block requires careful long-term management, and the presence of ventricular tachyarrhythmias as well as the location of block are important predictors of patient risk. SSS after surgery for ASD: 10/12 patients had Adams-Stokes, of which 6 (60%) had initial onset over 5 years after surgery, and 9 had paroxysmal atrial flutter and fibrillation which coincided with the onset of Adams-Stokes. 3 of 7 patients (42%) for whom preoperative ECG's were available had sinus bradycardia. Thus, SSS after ASD surgery may be preceded by preoperative deterioration of sinus node function and succeeded by late onset of Adams-Stokes, necessitating pre- and postoperative assessment of sinus node function. The presence of atrial tachyarrhythmias also serves as an important indicator of the severity of SSS after ASD surgery. The onset of Adams-Stokes varied by patient over a wide range of time, emphasizing the need for careful long-term follow-up. Clinical symptoms and prognosis were affected by tachyarrhythmias as well as the severity of the bradycardia. Therefore, the presence of ventricular/atrial tachyarrhythmias is an important factor in the long-term management of postoperative bradyarrhythmias.     

Ventricular fibrillation induced by rapid atrial rates in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

AIMS: To describe the mechanisms of induction of ventricular fibrillation (VF) by rapid atrial rates in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). METHODS: Electrophysiological studies, management and follow-up in three patients with HCM with VF induced by atrial pacing. RESULTS: In one patient, spontaneous sinus tachycardia triggered VF. In another patient, VF occurred after verapamil infusion during rapid atrial fibrillation, and in the remaining patient there was no clinical VF. In all three patients, short runs of atrial pacing (cycle length 272-380 ms) induced VF, and QRS widening preceded fibrillation in all patients. Marked ventricular electrogram fragmentation was documented in one patient during atrial pacing and in another patient during late ventricular extra-stimuli. Hypotension was associated with sinus tachycardia in one patient. The two patients developing clinical VF underwent atrioventricular (AV) junctional ablation; a ventricular defibrillator was implanted in one, and a mode-switching dual-chamber pacemaker in the other. No arrhythmic events occurred during 34- and 35-month follow-up, respectively. In the other patient, postatrial fibrillation pauses caused syncope, and he is asymptomatic 52 months after implantation of a dual-chamber pacemaker. CONCLUSIONS: Rapid atrial rates can trigger VF in some patients with HCM, probably through a combination of electrophysiological and ischaemic mechanisms. AV junctional ablation may prevent VF in selected cases.     

Pacing Mode and Long-Term Survival in Elderly Patients with Congestive Heart Failure: 1980-1985

Dual-chamber pacing may improve short-term hemodynamics and functional class in some patients with congestive heart failure, even in the absence of conventional indications for pacemaker implantation. However, the impact of different pacing modes on survival of patients with congestive heart failure is controversial. In this retrospective study we analyzed survival data from 546 elderly patients, aged 70 years and older, who underwent implantation of a permanent dual-chamber (DDD, n = 62, DVI, n = 102) or single-chamber (VVI) pacemaker (n = 382) between 1980 and 1985. Survival was further analyzed according to the presence or absence of congestive heart failure, and pacemaker mode (DDD vs. DVI vs. VVI). Overall, dual-chamber pacing (DDD and DVI) was associated with a more favorable long-term outcome when compared with single-chamber ventricular pacing, although differences were only significant for DDD pacing (P = 0.002). When patients with and without preexisting congestive heart failure were analyzed separately, survival following dual-chamber pacing (DDD and DVI) was significantly better than survival following single-chamber pacing in patients without congestive heart failure (P = 0.03), but not in patients with preexisting heart failure (P = 0.139). When patients were analyzed according to the electrophysiological indication for pacemaker implantation, overall survival of patients with AV block (P = 0.0025) but not sinus node dysfunction (P = 0.346) was improved with dual-chamber pacing. This survival advantage in patients with AV block following dual-chamber pacing was lost in the presence of heart failure P = 0.11). These findings suggest that dual-chamber pacing, in particular DDD pacing, improves the survival in elderly patients without preexisting congestive heart failure. In contrast to the short-term hemodynamic improvement observed in selected patients with congestive heart failure, dual-chamber pacing in elderly patients with congestive heart failure, paced for conventional indications, is not associated with improved survival when compared with single-chamber ventricular pacing.     

Pacemaker hemodynamics: Clinical implications

Our review of the current literature and experience in caring for pacemaker patients suggests that a consideration of hemodynamics is a logical way to approach pacemaker selection and programming. Multiple clinical factors enter into the selection of a pacemaker or pacemaker programming settings in each case. It appears that in patients with sinus node disease, atrial-inhibited or dual-chamber pacing provides the best chance for preventing the development of chronic atrial fibrillation with its attendant risks of embolism and stroke. It is clear that AV synchrony has beneficial hemodynamic effects at rest in most patients. The results of Labovitz would suggest that in patients with marked left atrial enlargement, this may be less so. The results of Stewart et al would further suggest that in patients with retrograde VA conduction, dual-chamber pacing is preferable. Retrograde VA conduction can be intermittent and this makes it difficult to use its absence on a single test to decide on the type of pacemaker to use. It appears that baseline left ventricular function does not determine the relative improvement in cardiac output observed with AV synchrony or rate-adaptive pacing. However, in patients with severe congestive heart failure even a small improvement in cardiac output may result in significant clinical improvement. Studies have shown that in any given patient, there may be an optimal AV interval at rest. In general, this ranges from 100 to 150 milliseconds. In normal individuals the optimal AV interval shortens with increased heart rate during exercise in a predictable and linear fashion. The hemodynamic benefits of a shortened AV interval with faster heart rates in pacemaker patients have not yet been shown. Intuitively, however, this would appear to be a desirable approach and will probably be added to the design of future generations of dual-chamber pacemakers. Studies of the effect of different pacing modes on secretion of atrial natriuretic factor are intriguing and may contribute more to our understanding of pacing hemodynamics in the future. During exercise, heart rate increase is more important than AV synchrony and this has been shown by several studies. Thus, in active patients with chronotropic incompetence due to sick sinus syndrome, the addition of rate-adaptive pacing is important. Because single-chamber rate-adaptive atrial pacing leaves the patient exposed to the risk of future development of AV block and DDD pacing does not provide chronotropic support, it is likely that the new rate-adaptive dual-chamber (DDDR) devices will be used in a significant number of these patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Patient with sick sinus syndrome and implanted dual-chamber pacemaker with reduced P-wave duration following low interatrial septal pacing: Case report

Introduction:A dual-chamber pacemaker (DDD/R) for a sinus node disease is sometimes referred to as a physiological pacemaker as it maintains atrioventricular synchrony, however several clinical trials have proved its inferiority to a nonphysiological single-chamber ventricular back-up pacing.Patient concerns:A subject of the study is a 74-year-old woman with a sick sinus syndrome (SSS) and a previously implanted physiological DDD/R pacemaker. The SSS was diagnosed because of patient''s very slow sinus rhythm of about 36 bpm, and due to several episodes of dizziness. After the DDD/R implantation the percentage of atrial pacing approached 100%, with almost none ventricular pacing.Diagnoses:Sick sinus syndrome, complete Bachmann''s bundle block, atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter.Interventions:The patient was previously implanted with a physiological DDD/R pacemaker. Several years after the implantation, the atrial fibrillation was diagnosed and the pulmonary vein isolation was then performed by cryoablation. During the follow-up after pulmonary vein isolation, the improvement of mitral filling parameters was assessed using echocardiography. Shortly thereafter the patient developed the persistent paroxysm of a typical atrial flutter which was successfully terminated using a radiofrequency ablation. No recurrence thereof has been observed ever since (24 months).Outcomes:The atrial electrode of the pacing system was implanted within the low interatrial septal region that resulted in a reduced P-wave duration compared to native sinus rhythm P-waves. The said morphology was deformed because of the complete Bachmann bundle block. That approach, despite a nonphysiological direction of an atrial activation, yielded relatively short P-waves (paced P-wave: 179 ms vs intrinsic sinus P-wave: 237 ms). It also contributed to a significantly shorter PR interval (paced PR: 204 ms vs sinus rhythm PR: 254 ms).Conclusions:The authors took into consideration different aspects of alternative right atrial pacing sites. This report has shown that in some patients with a sinus node disease, low interatrial septal pacing can reduce the P-wave duration but does not prevent from the development of atrial arrhythmias.     

Indications for dual-chamber cardioverter defibrillators at implant and at 1 year follow-up: a retrospective analysis in the single-chamber defibrillator era.

AIM: This retrospective four-centre study assessed the current indications for dual-chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) at implant and during a medium-term follow-up period in a group of patients treated by single-chamber ICD in the pre dual-chamber ICD era. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study population consisted of 153 consecutive patients (127 males, mean age 58 +/- 6 years) treated by single-chamber ICD for ventricular tachycardia and/or ventricular fibrillation. Definite indications for having a dual-chamber ICD included the presence of sinus node dysfunction and of second- or third-degree atrioventricular (AV) block, while possible indications were represented by paroxysmal atrial fibrillation or flutter and first-degree AV block. At implant, dual-chamber ICD would appear definitely indicated in 10.5% of cases, and possibly indicated in an additional 17.5% of cases. During 12 +/- 10 months follow-up, such percentages remained stable (11 and 19.5%, respectively). Inappropriate ICD intervention was documented in five of 13 patients (38%), with episodes of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation or flutter. CONCLUSION: In this non-selected study population, a dual-chamber ICD would have potentially benefited approximately 30% of the patients. During medium-term follow-up, there was no progression towards increasing dual-chamber ICD indications. The 15% cumulative incidence of paroxysmal atrial tachyarrhythmias justifies the activation of dedicated detection algorithms.     

Feasibility of dual-chamber (DDD) pacing via a single-pass (VDD) pacing lead employing a floating atrial ring (dipole): case series, future considerations, and refinements

The objective of this study was to assess the feasibility of DDD pacing from a standard single-pass VDD pacemaker system. Over the past 2 decades significant advances have been made in the development of single-pass VDD pacing systems. These have been shown in long-term prospective studies to effectively preserve atrioventricular (AV)synchrony in patients with AV block and normal sinus node function. What remains problematic is the development of a single-pass pacing system capable of DDD pacing. Such a lead configuration would be useful in those patients with peripheral venous anomalies and in younger patients with congenital anomalies, which may require lead revisions in the future. In addition, with the increased use of resynchronization (biventricular pacing) therapy, the availability of a reliable single-pass lead will minimize operative time, enhance patient safety, and minimize the amount of hardware within the heart. The feasibility of DDD pacing via a Medtronic Capsure VDD-2 (Model #5038) pacing lead was evaluated. Twenty patients who presented with AV block and normal sinus node function were recruited for this study. Atrial pacing thresholds and sensitivities were assessed intraoperatively in the supine position with various respiratory maneuvers. Five patients who agreed to participate in long-term follow-up received a dual-chamber generator and were evaluated periodically over a 12-month period. Mean atrial sensitivity was 2.35 +/- 0.83 mV at the time of implantation. Effective atrial stimulation was possible in all patients at the time of implantation (mean stimulation threshold 3.08 +/- 1.04 V at 0.5 ms [bipolar], 3.34 +/- 0.95 V at 0.5 ms [unipolar]). Five of the 20 patients received a Kappa KDR701 generator, and atrial electrical properties were followed up over a 1-year period. There was no significant change in atrial pacing threshold or incidence of phrenic nerve stimulation over the 1-year follow-up. A standard single-pass VDD pacing lead system was capable of DDD pacing intraoperatively and during long-term follow-up. Despite higher than usual thresholds via the atrial dipole, pacemaker telemetry revealed < 10% use of atrial pacing dipole over a 12-month period, which would minimally deplete the pacemaker's battery. In addition, the telemetry confirmed appropriate sensing and pacing of the atrial dipole throughout the study period. At this time such systems can serve as back-up DDD pacing systems with further refinements required to optimize atrial thresholds in all patients.