共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 0 毫秒
1.
目的:探讨阿立哌唑对抗精神病药所致闭经的精神分裂症患者的影响.方法:69例抗精神病药引起闭经的女性精神分裂症患者,随机分为A组(单用阿立哌唑治疗)34例和B组(用其他抗精神病药联合中药血府逐瘀汤治疗)35例,观察疗程3个月.于治疗前、治疗后1、2、3个月测定血清催乳素浓度,并评定闭经的疗效.结果:治疗后两组血清催乳素浓... 相似文献
2.
BackgroundPoor adherence to antipsychotic drugs is a major problem in schizophrenia management and one of the most important risk factors for relapse and hospitalization. To date, there is little evidence on persistence predictors with long-acting injectable antipsychotics, especially with aripiprazole once-monthly (AOM). This study () aimed to describe the impact of demographic and clinical characteristics on persistence with AOM treatment in real-world setting.MethodsThis was an observational, retrospective, non-interventional study that included adult patients with schizophrenia who were initiated on AOM during a schizophrenia-related hospitalization. Data were retrospectively collected from patients’ medical records. The primary variable was persistence with AOM, measured as the number of days from AOM initiation up to all-cause AOM discontinuation during the first six months after treatment index.Results140 patients were enrolled and 91 fulfilled the selection criteria. Six months after AOM initiation, 65 (71.4%) patients were still receiving AOM treatment, whereas 26 (28.6%) were not. The mean (standard deviation) time to AOM treatment discontinuation in the first six months was 138.1 (6.8) days, with most of the patients discontinuing at the first 28 days. The risk of AOM discontinuation in the first six months increases 1.05-fold annually since schizophrenia diagnosis (p=0.003); moreover, this risk increases 2.86-fold in patients with concomitant schizophrenia medication at AOM initiation compared to patients without concomitant schizophrenia treatments (p=0.02).ConclusionsMain factors predicting persistence with AOM treatment at six months in clinical practice are fewer years since schizophrenia diagnosis and not receiving concomitant schizophrenia treatments at AOM initiation. NCT03130478相似文献
3.
阿立哌唑对精神分裂症患者生活质量的影响 总被引:5,自引:1,他引:5
王刚平 《临床精神医学杂志》2006,16(6):360-361
目的:比较阿立哌唑与利培酮对精神分裂症患者生活质量的影响。方法:60例精神分裂患者随机平分为两组各30例,分别给予阿立哌唑和利培酮治疗。疗程8周。用生活质量综合评定问卷-74(GQOLI-74)、阳性与阴性症状量表(PANSS)及副反应量表(TESS)评定疗效及不良反应。结果:阿立哌唑与利培酮均能显著提高精神分裂症患者生活质量,但阿立哌唑在改善GQOLI-74总分、躯体健康及社会功能维度优于利培酮。结论:阿立哌唑治疗有利于提高精神分裂症患者生活质量。 相似文献
4.
目的:探讨阿立哌唑对抗精神病药物所致的老年精神分裂症患者高催乳素血症的影响.方法:63例抗精神病药所致高催乳素血症的老年精神分裂症患者随机分为研究组(33例)和对照组(30例).两组沿用原有抗精神病药物,研究组加用阿立哌唑5 mg/d持续12周.分别于入组前、入组4、8、12周末检测血清催乳素水平,同时采用简明精神病评定量表(BPRS)和治疗中出现的症状量表(TESS)评定精神病性症状及药物不良反应. 结果:入组4、8、12周末研究组血清催乳素水平较入组前及对照组显著降低(P均<0.05);对照组入组前后血清催乳素水平差异无统计学意义(P均>0.05).两组人组前后BPRS、TESS评分差异无统计学意义(P均>0.05). 结论:阿立哌唑可有效降低抗精神病药物所致老年精神分裂症患者血清催乳素水平增高,且并未增加药物不良反应. 相似文献
5.
目的:比较奥氮平和阿立哌唑对精神分裂症患者体质量、血浆神经肽Y及瘦素水平的影响。方法:60例精神分裂症患者随机分为奥氮平组和阿立哌唑组各30例分别治疗8周。在治疗前、治疗后4周和8周测定两组体质量、血浆神经肽Y和瘦素水平并进行治疗前后比较。结果:奥氮平组在治疗4周和8周时体质量(F=287.207,F=506.777)、血浆神经肽Y水平(F=725.697,F=5152.624)明显高于治疗前(P均=0.000);瘦素水平治疗4周时与治疗前差异无统计学意义(F=3.908,P=0.058),治疗8周时高于治疗前(F=1589.726,P=0.000)。阿立哌唑组治疗4周和8周时体质量(F=2.810,F=1.819)、血浆神经肽Y(F=0.232,F=0.376)及瘦素水平(F=0.975,F=1.295)与治疗前比较差异无统计学意义(均P0.05)。奥氮平组治疗4周和8周时体质量的变化与神经肽Y的变化明显正相关(r=0.632,r=0.576;均P0.001),与瘦素的变化无相关(r=0.254,r=0.085;P均0.05)。逐步回归分析显示,奥氮平组神经肽Y变化进入以体质量变化为因变量的回归方程,治疗4周和8周时,神经肽Y变化可以解释体质量变化变异的40.0%和33.1%。结论:与阿立哌唑相比,奥氮平能显著增加精神分裂症患者体质量;血浆神经肽Y水平的变化可能是体质量增加的原因之一。 相似文献
6.
阿立哌唑对首发精神分裂症患者代谢的影响 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
目的:探讨阿立哌唑对精神分裂症患者泌乳素、血糖和体质量的影响。方法:用随机方法将100例精神分裂症患者分成阿立哌唑组、利培酮组和氯氮平组,治疗12周。于治疗前和治疗4、8、12周,采用放射免疫法测量泌乳素、血糖和体质量。结果:治疗前后泌乳素、血糖水平和体质量,阿立哌唑组无明显变化,利培酮组和氯氮平组治疗后显著增加,并且与阿立哌唑组比较差异具有显著统计学意义(P<0.05或P<0.01)。结论:阿立哌唑对精神分裂症患者的泌乳素、血糖和体质量影响较小。 相似文献
7.
8.
《The world journal of biological psychiatry》2013,14(2-2):502-505
Clozapine is still the gold standard in treatment-resistant schizophrenia. However, a substantial amount of patients do not fully recover on clozapine monotherapy. Though there is still a lack of randomised controlled studies of combination strategies in treatment-resistant schizophrenia, they are widely used. Aripiprazole is a relatively new therapeutic option due to its partial D2 agonism. Both clozapine and aripiprazole, though having a generally favourable side-effect profile, may lead to insufficient response and might provoke side effects in monotherapy. We report the case of four patients in whom we observed a distinct clinical improvement with respect to positive and negative symptoms without major side effects under a combination of clozapine and aripiprazole. The combination of clozapine action and aripiprazole-mediated D2 receptor regulation could be responsible for the described favourable effects and for the increase of D2 receptor blockade after adding aripiprazole to clozapine observed in one patient. A combination of clozapine and aripiprazole may be an effective therapeutic strategy for some schizophrenic patients, leading to a good response with respect to positive and negative symptoms without the occurrence of major side effects. 相似文献
9.
目的:探讨阿立哌唑、舒必利对精神分裂症患者生活质量的影响.方法:对70例精神分裂症患者随机分为两组,分别给予阿立哌唑和舒必利治疗.疗程3个月.用阳性症状与阴性症状量表(PANSS)评定精神症状,用世界卫生组织编制的生活质量量表(WHOQOL-100)评定生活质量.结果:治疗3个月后,阿立哌唑对精神分裂症阳性症状、阴性症状的改善和舒必利相似,两组间 PANSS 评分差异无显著性.阿立哌唑组 WHOQOL-100 各领域除精神支柱外均明显改善,在生活领域、心理领域、独立性领域、社会关系领域较舒必利有显著改善.结论:阿立哌唑组患者生活质量优于舒必利组. 相似文献
10.
阿立哌唑治疗精神分裂症临床观察 总被引:26,自引:1,他引:26
以阿立哌唑治疗精神分裂症患者40例,报告如下。1对象和方法为我院2004年10月至2005年3月门诊患者,符合中国精神障碍分类与诊断标准第3版精神分裂症或分裂样精神病诊断标准;年龄15~59岁;排除器质性疾病,药物或酒依赖,妊娠、哺乳期妇女;阳性与阴性症状量表(PANSS)总分≥60分。共4 相似文献
11.
阿立哌唑与利培酮治疗精神分裂症对照研究 总被引:3,自引:0,他引:3
目的:比较阿立哌唑与利培酮对精神分裂症的疗效及安全性。方法:选取70例精神分裂症患者,随机分为阿立哌唑组36例,利培酮组34例,分别给予阿立哌唑和利培酮治疗,疗程8周。在治疗前及治疗1、2、4、6、8周末分别采用阳性与阴性症状量表(PANSS)、治疗中出现的症状量表(TESS)对两组进行评定。并于治疗前、中、后检查催乳素水平。结果:两组治疗后PANSS评分均有显著下降。阿立哌唑组的锥体外系不良反应、体质量增加及月经失调均较利培酮组少而轻,对催乳素水平没有影响。结论:2药对精神分裂症均有较好的疗效,起效快,不良反应小。 相似文献
12.
阿立哌唑与利培酮治疗精神分裂症研究 总被引:2,自引:0,他引:2
目的:评价阿立哌唑治疗精神分裂症的疗效及不良反应。方法:64例精神分裂症患者,随机分为两组,分别给予阿立哌唑与利培酮治疗8周。采用阳性与阴性症状量表(PANSS)、治疗中出现的症状量表(TESS)评定疗效及不良反应。结果:阿立哌唑组显效率为78.1%,利培酮组为75.0%。利培酮组锥体外系反应稍高于阿立哌唑组。结论:阿立哌唑与利培酮疗效相似,锥体外系反应比利培酮少,是一种有效、安全的抗精神病药物。 相似文献
13.
Anthony H. Barnett Helen L. Millar Jean-Yves Loze Gilbert J. l’Italien Marc van Baardewijk Martin Knapp 《European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience》2009,259(4):239-247
Patients with schizophrenia experience elevated rates of morbidity and mortality, largely due to an increased incidence of
cardiovascular disease and diabetes. There is increasing concern that some atypical antipsychotic therapies are associated
with adverse metabolic symptoms, such as weight gain, dyslipidaemia and glucose dysregulation. These metabolic symptoms may
further increase the risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) and diabetes in this population and, subsequently, the cost of treating
these patients’ physical health. The STAR study showed that the metabolic side effects of aripiprazole treatment are less
than that experienced by those receiving standard-of-care (SOC). In a follow-up study the projected risks for diabetes or
CHD, calculated using the Stern and Framingham models, were lower in the aripiprazole treatment group. Assuming the risk of
diabetes onset/CHD events remained linear over 10 years, these risks were used to estimate the difference in direct and indirect
cost consequences of diabetes and CHD in schizophrenia patients treated with aripiprazole or SOC over a 10-year period. Diabetes
costs were estimated from the UKPDS and UK T2ARDIS studies, respectively, and CHD costs were estimated using prevalence data from the Health Survey of England and the
published literature. All costs were inflated to 2007 costs using the NHS pay and prices index. The number of avoided diabetes
cases (23.4 cases per 1,000 treated patients) in patients treated with aripiprazole compared with SOC was associated with
estimated total (direct and indirect) cost savings of £37,261,293 over 10 years for the UK population. Similarly, the number
of avoided CHD events (3.7 events per 1,000 treated patients) was associated with estimated total cost savings of £7,506,770
over 10 years. Compared with SOC, aripiprazole treatment may provide reductions in the health and economic burden to schizophrenia
patients and health care services in the UK as a result of its favourable metabolic profile. 相似文献
14.
目的:比较奥氮平与阿立哌唑治疗精神分裂症的疗效与安全性。方法:100例精神分裂症患者随机分为两组,每组各50例。分别给予奥氮平和阿立哌唑治疗,疗程8周。采用阳性与阴性症状量表(PANSS)、临床疗效总评量表疾病严重程度(CGI-SI)、治疗中出现的症状量表(TESS)评定疗效及不良反应。结果:两组PANSS总分及CGI-SI评分均较治疗前显著下降(P均<0.01)。奥氮平组显效率76.0%,阿立哌唑组显效率72.0%,两组疗效相仿(P>0.05)。奥氮平组嗜睡、体质量增加、血脂升高的不良反应均明显高于阿立哌唑组(P<0.01);阿立哌唑组锥体外系反应、失眠、兴奋或激越均明显高于奥氮平组(P<0.01)。结论:奥氮平和阿立哌唑对精神分裂症的疗效相当,安全性较高。 相似文献
15.
目的:探讨阿立哌唑与利培酮治疗首发精神分裂症的疗效和安全性。方法:将148例首发精神分裂症患者随机分为阿立哌唑组75例和利培酮组73例。以阳性与阴性症状量表(PANSS)减分率评定疗效同时评定社会功能缺陷筛选表(SDSS)和治疗中出现的症状量表(TESS),以SDSS评定社会功能,用TESS评定不良反应。结果:阿立哌唑组与利培酮组在痊愈率、显效率、PANSS评分与SDSS评分差异无统计学意义(P均〉0.05)。阿立哌唑组在体质量增加、内分泌失调与锥体外系方面少于利培酮组,而在兴奋激越与恶心呕吐多于利培酮组,差异均具有统计学意义(P均〈0.05)。结论:阿立哌唑与利培酮治疗首发精神分裂症长期疗效均好,阿立哌唑不良反应较少,依从性高。 相似文献
16.
阿立哌唑与氯氮平治疗精神分裂症对照研究 总被引:14,自引:1,他引:14
目的:探讨阿立哌唑与氯氮平对首发精神分裂症患者的临床疗效及安全性。方法:对64例精神分裂症患者随机分为两组,分别给予阿立哌唑与氯氮平治疗,疗程8周。用阳性与阴性症状量表(PANSS)和副反应量表(TESS)评定疗效和不良反应。结果:两组疗效差异无显著性(P>0.05),阿立哌唑不良反应显著少于氯氮平(P<0.01)。结论:阿立哌唑是一种安全有效的抗精神病药。 相似文献
17.
目的:探讨阿立哌唑联合丙戊酸镁缓释片治疗精神分裂症患者攻击行为的疗效及安全性。方法:70例有攻击行为的精神分裂症患者随机分为合用药组和单用药组,各35例,分别给予阿立哌唑联合丙戊酸镁缓释片与单一阿立哌唑治疗,疗程6周。用阳性与阴性症状量表(PANSS)、外显攻击行为量表(修订版)(MOAS)和治疗中出现的症状量表(TESS)评定疗效和不良反应。结果:治疗后两组PANSS评分及MOAS评分较治疗前均显著下降(P均〈0.01);以合用药组PANSS总分及阳性症状分、MOAS总分较单用药组下降显著(P〈0.05或P〈0.01);两组不良反应差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结论:阿立哌唑联合丙戊酸镁缓释片治疗精神分裂症攻击行为疗效好,安全性高。 相似文献
18.
A review of aripiprazole in the treatment of patients with schizophrenia or bipolar I disorder 下载免费PDF全文
Leslie Citrome 《Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment》2006,2(4):427-443
Aripiprazole has been approved by regulatory agencies for the treatment of schizophrenia and bipolar I disorder. Although it is a dopamine partial agonist, it also has substantial binding affinity for the serotonin 5HT2A receptor. Several double-blind randomized clinical trials have established the efficacy and tolerability of aripiprazole within the dose range of 10–30 mg/day for schizophrenia, and 15–30 mg/day for manic or mixed states associated with bipolar I disorder. Relatively few comparative trials with other second-generation antipsychotics have been published for schizophrenia, with none available for bipolar disorder. The evidence so far suggests that in terms of efficacy for schizophrenia, aripiprazole is superior to placebo and haloperidol (long term), similar to perphenazine and risperidone, and inferior to olanzapine. Its tolerability profile in patients with schizophrenia appears superior to haloperidol, perphenazine, risperidone, and olanzapine. Efficacy in treating manic or mixed states was established in placebo-controlled trials. Among some patients with bipolar disorder, akathisia and gastrointestinal (GI) complaints can emerge at the start of treatment; however, the GI symptoms were time-limited in many instances. Appropriate dosing may also be important in individualizing therapy to improve tolerability, with lower starting doses becoming more important when adding to, or switching from, another antipsychotic. Aripiprazole appears to have a low propensity for weight gain, a favorable metabolic profile, and no association with hyperprolactinemia. 相似文献
19.
阿立哌唑治疗首发精神分裂症对照研究 总被引:11,自引:1,他引:11
目的:探讨阿立哌唑治疗首发精神分裂症的疗效和不良反应。方法:分别以阿立哌唑与氯丙嗪治疗首发精神分裂症各30例,采用阳性与阴性症状量表(PANSS)、副反应量表(TESS)评定疗效和不良反应。结果:阿立哌唑组有效率83.3%,显效率70.0%,氯丙嗪组有效率80.0%,显效率66.7%。两组疗效相仿,但阿立哌唑对阴性症状的改善优于氯丙嗪,且不良反应少于氯丙嗪。结论:阿立哌唑是一种安全有效的抗精神病药,尤其有助于阴性症状的改善。 相似文献