Phase I study of 3-weekly docetaxel, capecitabine and oxaliplatin combination chemotherapy in patients with previously untreated advanced gastric cancer

Purpose

Adding docetaxel to cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (DCF) significantly improved clinical efficacy in advanced gastric cancer (AGC). To further improve the efficacy and tolerability, we substituted oxaliplatin for cisplatin and capecitabine for 5-FU in the DCF regimen and performed a phase I study to determine the recommended dose (RD) and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of docetaxel, capecitabine and oxaliplatin (DXO) combination in patients with AGC.

Materials and methods

Previously untreated patients with histologically proven metastatic AGC and ECOG performance status 0–2 were enrolled. Docetaxel and oxaliplatin were administered i.v. on day 1. Capecitabine was administered orally bid on days 1–14. Each cycle was repeated every 3 weeks. DLTs were evaluated during the first two cycles of treatment.

Results

Twenty-one patients were enrolled: 15 patients in dose-escalation phase and 6 patients in the extension at the RD. Median age was 50 years (range 21–65 years). At dose level 3 (60 mg/m² docetaxel, 1,000 mg/m² capecitabine, 100 mg/m² oxaliplatin), 1 diarrhea (DLT) was found among 6 patients while at dose level 4 (60 mg/m² docetaxel, 800 mg/m² capecitabine, 130 mg/m² oxaliplatin), 2 DLTs (febrile neutropenia and diarrhea) were observed among 3 patients. Therefore, the dose level 3 was determined as RD. DLTs include grade 3 diarrhea and febrile neutropenia. Cumulative (all cycles) grade 3/4 toxicity included neutropenia (75%), leucopenia (50%), febrile neutropenia (25%), diarrhea (17%), and neuropathy (17%). Of 14 patients with measurable lesions, 11 achieved partial response and 3 showed stable disease.

Conclusion

The RD of the DXO regimen in patients with AGC is capecitabine 1,000 mg/m² twice daily on days 1–14, in combination with decetaxel 60 mg/m² (day 1) and oxaliplatin 100 mg/m² (day 1) repeated every 3 weeks. The DXO regimen seems to have promising activity and offers an easy alternative to DCF. The toxicities appear to be still substantial, but manageable.     

Biweekly docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (DCF) chemotherapy for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a phase I dose-escalation study

Background and purpose

The optimal chemotherapeutic protocol for the treatment of esophageal cancer has not yet been established. A dose-escalation study of docetaxel combined with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) was performed to determine the optimal dose in patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Patients and method

We studied a total of 18 patients who had previously untreated thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with T4 tumors and/or metastasis. The patients received an infusion of docetaxel at different dose levels (levels 1, 2, 3: 30, 35, 40 mg/m², respectively) and an infusion of cisplatin (40 mg/m²) on days 1 and 15 plus a continuous infusion of 5-FU (400 mg/m²/day) on days 1–5 and 15–19.

Results

Dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) included febrile neutropenia and leukopenia. DLT occurred in 2 of 6 patients at level 1, 2 and in 3 of 6 patients at level 3. The response rate was 88.9%, including a complete response rate of 33.3%.

Conclusions

To minimize toxicity and maximize dose intensity, we elected to investigate a biweekly regimen. The maximum tolerated dose was level 3, and the recommended dose was determined to be docetaxel 35 mg/m² with cisplatin 40 mg/m² plus 5-FU 400 mg/m², administered biweekly. This regimen was tolerable and highly active. A phase II study has been started.     

Sequential chemotherapy with cisplatin, leucovorin, and 5-fluorouracil followed by docetaxel in previously untreated patients with metastatic gastric cancer: a phase II study

Background

The combination of docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) has demonstrated a survival advantage over cisplatin and 5-FU, but with substantial hematological toxicity. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of a sequential regimen with cisplatin, leucovorin, and 5-FU (PLF) followed by docetaxel in metastatic gastric cancer patients.

Methods

Treatment consisted of 4 cycles of biweekly PLF (cisplatin 50?mg/m² as a 30-min infusion on day 1, leucovorin 200?mg/m² in a 2-h infusion, and 5-FU 2,800?mg/m² in a 48-h continuous infusion starting on day 1) followed, in cases of response or stable disease, by 3 cycles of docetaxel (75?mg/m², every 3?weeks).

Results

Thirty-four patients were enrolled, with an average age of 64?years (range 34–69). The main cumulative grade 3–4 toxicities were: neutropenia (38.2%), febrile neutropenia (11.8%), and fatigue (14.7%). After the planned 7 cycles of treatment, the overall response rate was 38.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 21.9–54.6), with 3 complete and 10 partial responses. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 4.8 and 10.6?months, respectively.

Conclusions

For patients with metastatic gastric cancer, the sequential administration of cisplatin, leucovorin, 5-FU, and docetaxel may be an effective palliative option and offers a far more favorable toxicity profile than the simultaneous use of docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-FU.     

Phase I clinical trial of hepatic arterial infusion of cisplatin in combination with intravenous liposomal doxorubicin in patients with advanced cancer and dominant liver involvement

Purpose

We conducted a phase I study of hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) cisplatin and systemic chemotherapy in patients with advanced cancer and dominant liver involvement.

Methods

Patients were treated with HAI cisplatin 100–125 mg/m² (and 3,000 IU heparin) intraarterially and liposomal doxorubicin (doxil) 20–35 mg/m² IV (day 1) every 28 days. A “3 + 3” study design was used.

Results

Thirty patients were treated (median age, 56 years). Diagnoses were breast cancer (n = 11), colorectal cancer (n = 8), ocular melanoma (n = 4), and other (n = 7). The median number of prior therapies was 5. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was at the 100/35 mg/m² level. Dose-limiting toxicities were Grade 4 neutropenia (2 of 4 patients), and Grade 4 thrombocytopenia (n = 1) at the cisplatin 125 mg/m² and systemic doxil 35 mg/m² dose level. The most common toxicities were nausea/vomiting and fatigue. Of 24 patients evaluable for response, 4 (17%) had a partial response (PR) and 7 (29%) had stable disease (SD) for ≥4 months. Of the 11 patients with breast cancer, 3 (27%) had a PR and 5 (45%) had SD for ≥4 months. Of 4 patients with ocular melanoma, 1 had a PR and 1 SD for 4 months. One patient with hepatocellular carcinoma had SD for 4 months. Of 12 evaluable patients treated at the MTD, 2 (17%) had a PR and 5 (42%) had SD.

Conclusion

The MTD was HAI cisplatin 100 mg/m² and systemic doxil 35 mg/m². This regimen demonstrated antitumor activity, especially in breast cancer.     

A phase I study of paclitaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil (TCF) for advanced gastric cancer

Purpose

A phase I study of TCF therapy, which consists of paclitaxel (TXL: Taxol^®) + cisplatin (CDDP) + 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), in advanced gastric cancer patients was performed to determine the recommended dose (RD) for a phase II study by checking the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of 5-FU above the fixed dose of TXL and CDDP.

Methods

The doses of TXL and CDDP were fixed at 80 and 25 mg/m², respectively, while that of 5-FU was increased by 100 mg/m² in each cohort from 300 mg/m² (level 1) to a maximum of 600 mg/m² (level 4). One cycle consisted of administration of these agents once per week for 3 weeks, every 4 weeks.

Results

A total of twelve eligible patients were included in this study. At level 1, two of three cases showed grade 3 leukopenia. At level 2, one of three cases showed grade 4 neutropenia (recovered within 3 days), and another one case showed grade 3 neutropenia. At level 3, one of three cases showed grade 3 neutropenia, and at level 4, one of three cases showed grade 4 neutropenia (recovered within 3 days), with grade 3 neutropenia in the other two cases. Even at the highest dose administered, none of the patients showed DLT. Moreover, no non-hematological toxicity judged to be DLT was observed through all levels. Six of the twelve patients had measurable disease, and the overall response rate was 83%.

Conclusions

Although the MTD level was not determined, based on the observed efficacy and the results of other clinical trials, the recommended doses of TXL, CDDP, and 5-FU for the TCF regimen were set as 80, 25, and 600 mg/m², respectively, and a phase II study to investigate the clinical effectiveness and safety of this regimen has now begun.     

Concurrent chemoradiation followed by adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma in Korea

Purpose

Concomitant approach using cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) has shown an excellent local control rate and significantly reduced distant metastasis in patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). However, optimal schedule and dosing of chemotherapy still need to be developed to reduce distant metastasis. This retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy, toxicity, and tolerability of a concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT) regimen using cisplatin and 5-FU followed by adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in patients with locoregioanlly advanced NPC.

Methods

Forty-three NPC patients who had AJCC stage T3/T4 or N2/N3 and M0 disease were evaluated. The chemotherapy during CCRT consisted of cisplatin (75 mg/m² on day 1) plus 5-FU (750 mg/m²/day on day 1–5), delivered every 4 weeks for two cycles. Three cycles of AC were given with cisplatin (75 mg/m²), epirubicin (37.5 mg/m²) on day 1, and bleomycin (7.5 mg/m² bolus iv. on day 1 followed by 9 mg/m² on day 1–5 by continuous infusion) every 3 weeks.

Results

The overall response rate after CCRT was 95% (22 CRs and 19 PRs in 43) and 100% (16 CRs and 8 PRs in 24) after AC. Grade 3/4 neutropenia, mucositis, and weight loss were observed during CCRT phase in 18, 44, and 26% of patients, respectively. AC caused grade 3/4 neutropenia and emesis in 12.5 and 20.8% of patients, respectively.

Conclusions

CCRT regimen using cisplatin and 5-FU followed by three cycles of BEC chemotherapy was effective in locally advanced NPC patients, with acceptable and reversible acute toxicities.     

Sunitinib combined with pemetrexed and cisplatin: results of a phase I dose-escalation and pharmacokinetic study in patients with advanced solid malignancies, with an expanded cohort in non-small cell lung cancer and mesothelioma

Purpose

To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety and tolerability of sunitinib plus pemetrexed and cisplatin for advanced solid malignancies.

Methods

Using a 3 + 3 dose-escalation design, patients received oral sunitinib (37.5 or 50 mg) qd on a continuous daily dosing (CDD) schedule or Schedule 2/1 (2 weeks on, 1 week off treatment) plus pemetrexed (400 or 500 mg/m² IV) and cisplatin (75 mg/m² IV) q3w up to 6 cycles.

Results

Sunitinib 37.5 mg/pemetrexed 400 mg/m²/cisplatin 75 mg/m² CDD (n = 5) was not tolerated. Lower doses on this schedule were not explored. The Schedule 2/1 MTD (n = 15) was sunitinib 37.5 mg/pemetrexed 500 mg/m²/cisplatin 75 mg/m², based on one dose-limiting toxicity (myocardial infarction) out of six patients. The MTD was further studied in an expansion cohort of 10 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients and one mesothelioma patient. There were no clinically significant drug–drug interactions. Cumulative myelosuppression was problematic: the median relative dose intensity (% actual/intended) across all cycles was 61 % for sunitinib, 78 % for pemetrexed, and 74 % for cisplatin. Four of eight NSCLC patients in the dose-escalation and expansion cohorts at the Schedule 2/1 MTD who were evaluable for efficacy had stable disease ≥8 weeks, and the one patient with mesothelioma had a partial response.

Conclusions

In patients with advanced solid malignancies, sunitinib was not tolerated at 37.5 mg CDD with standard pemetrexed and cisplatin doses. Dose reductions were often needed due to cumulative myelosuppression following cycle 1. The MTD showed modest antitumor activity.     

Efficacy and toxicity of concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with advanced oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma

Purpose

The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and toxicity of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with docetaxel, cisplatin (CDDP) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (TPF regimen) or with CDDP, 5-FU, methotrexate and leucovorin (PFML regimen) in previously untreated patients with advanced oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC).

Methods

Fifty-six eligible patients with stage III or IV oropharyngeal SCC were treated with CCRT. Forty-four patients were men and 12 were women, and the average age of the patients was 58.8?years (range, 37?C72?years). In the TPF group, patients received CCRT with the TPF regimen [docetaxel (50?mg/m², day 1), CDDP (60?mg/m², day 4) and a continuous 5-FU infusion (600?mg/m²/day, days 1?C5)]. In the PFML group, patients received CCRT with the PFML regimen [CDDP (60?mg/m², day 4), a continuous 5-FU infusion (600?mg/m²/day, days 1?C5), methotrexate (30?mg/m², day 1) and leucovorin (10?mg/m²/day, days 1?C5)]. The total radiation dose was between 66.6 and 70.2?Gy.

Results

The overall 5-year survival rate was 64.6% in all patients, 68.6% in the resectable group and 47.4% in the unresectable group. The 5-year disease-specific survival rate was 72.2% in all patients, 78.1% in the resectable group and 47.7% in the unresectable group. Regarding clinical stage, the 5-year disease-specific survival rates were 91% in stage III, 72% in stage IVa and 44% in stage IVb.

Conclusion

CCRT with TPF or PFML regimen for advanced oropharyngeal SCC is tolerable and effective, especially in patients with resectable disease.     

Phase I/II study of intraperitoneal docetaxel plus S-1 for the gastric cancer patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis

Purpose

We designed a phase I/II trial of intraperitoneal (IP) docetaxel plus S-1 to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose (RD) and to evaluate its efficacy and safety in gastric cancer patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC).

Methods

Patients with PC confirmed by laparoscopy or laparotomy received IP docetaxel on days 1 and 15 and S-1 (80 mg/m²) on days 1–14 every 4 weeks.

Results

In the phase I part (n = 12), each cohort received escalating doses of docetaxel (35–50 mg/m²); the MTD was determined to be 50 mg/m² and the RD was determined to be 45 mg/m². Dose-limiting toxicities included grade 3 febrile neutropenia and grade 3 diarrhea. In the phase II part (n = 27), the median number of courses was 4 (range 2–11). The 1-year overall survival (OS) rate was 70 % (95 % confidence interval 53–87 %). The overall response rate was 22 % and peritoneal cytology turned negative in 18 of 22 (81 %) patients. The most frequent grade 3/4 toxicities included anorexia (19 %), neutropenia (7 %), and leukopenia (7 %).

Conclusion

IP docetaxel plus S-1 is active and safety in gastric cancer patients with PC.     

Biweekly docetaxel,fluorouracil, leucovorin,oxaliplatin (TEF) as first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer and adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction: safety and efficacy in a multicenter cohort

Background

Docetaxel–cisplatin-5-FU chemotherapy is superior to 5-FU-cisplatin in terms of response rate and survival in advanced gastric cancer (AGC), but is more toxic. Oxaliplatin is better tolerated than cisplatin, which it can effectively replace in this setting. We hypothesize that incorporating docetaxel into a simplified FOLFOX regimen should be a tolerable and effective option in first-line treatment of AGC.

Methods

Data were collected at six  French centers from patients with metastatic or local AGC who received docetaxel, fluorouracil, leucovorin, or oxaliplatin (TEF) as first-line treatment. TEF was administered as follows: docetaxel (50 mg/m²), oxaliplatin (85 mg/m²), and leucovorin (40 mg/m²) on day 1, and 5-FU continuous infusion for 48 h (2400 mg/m²) every 2 weeks.

Results

Forty-one patients were enrolled. Performance status was grade 0 and 1 in respectively 27 and 58 % of patients; 17 patients had adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction; 37 patients had metastatic disease, 22 had a poorly differentiated or diffuse type. Objective response rate was 66 %, with a complete response in two patients (5 %). Median progression-free survival and overall survival were respectively 6.3 and 12.1 months. Tolerability was acceptable with no treatment-related deaths. The most frequent grade 3–4 toxicities were neutropenia (30 %) and neuropathy (12.5 %). Curative intent surgery after response to TEF was performed in seven patients (17 %).

Conclusion

TEF is an effective first-line treatment with an acceptable toxicity profile for patients with AGC. It may allow curative resection in initially unresectable patients. TEF should now be evaluated in prospective randomized trials.     

Phase I trial of dose escalation of capecitabine combined with fixed docetaxel in previously treated patients with non-small cell lung cancer

Objective

Capecitabine combined with docetaxel have demonstrated antitumor synergy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Due to absence of phase I trial in China, we conducted this study to define the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of capecitabine with fixed docetaxel for Chinese patients with previously treated NSCLC.

Methods

Previously treated patients with NSCLC were entered into this study. Escalating doses of capecitabine with fixed docetaxel were administered in a modified Fibonacci sequence. The initial doses were capecitabine 625 mg/m², bid, on days d5?Cd18, and docetaxel 30 mg/m² on days 1 and 8, respectively. The regimen was repeated every 21 days. If no dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was observed, the next dose level was applied. The procedures were repeated until DLT appeared. The MTD was declared to be one dose level below the level at which DLT appeared.

Results

Eighteen patients received 67 cycles at capecitabine of level I (1250 mg/m², divided into 625 mg/m², bid) and level II (1500 mg/m², 750 mg/m², bid). The most common toxicities were neutropenia, hand and feet syndrome, fatigue and nausea. Eight DLTs occurred in 5 patients in the whole group, including 1 DLT in dose level I and 7 DLTs in dose level 2. Since 4 of 6 patients in level II experienced DLTs, we declared thus level I was MTD.

Conclusion

MTD of our phase I trial was capecitabine of 1250 mg/m²/d combined with docetaxel of 30 mg/m²/wk. This combination regimen was well tolerated for previously treated patients with NSCLC. The efficacy of this schedule is currently being further evaluated in a prospective phase II trial.     

A phase I dose-escalation trial of 2-deoxy-d-glucose alone or combined with docetaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors

Purpose

This phase I trial was initiated to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the glycolytic inhibitor, 2-deoxy-d-glucose (2DG) in combination with docetaxel, in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Methods

A modified accelerated titration design was used. 2DG was administered orally once daily for 7 days every other week starting at a dose of 2 mg/kg and docetaxel was administered intravenously at 30 mg/m² for 3 of every 4 weeks beginning on day 1 of week 2. Following the completion of dose escalation, cohorts of patients were then treated with 2DG for 21 days or every day of each 4-week cycle for up to 12 cycles.

Results

Thirty-four patients were enrolled: 21 on every other week, 6 on a 21 of 28-day cycle and 7 on the continuous 2DG dosing schedule. There were no dose-limiting toxicities which met the MTD criteria. The most common adverse events were fatigue, sweating, dizziness and nausea mimicking the hypoglycemic symptoms expected from 2DG administration. Therefore, 63 mg/kg was selected as the clinically tolerable dose. The most significant adverse effects noted at 63–88 mg/kg doses were reversible hyperglycemia (100 %), gastrointestinal bleeding (6 %) and reversible grade 3 QTc prolongation (22 %). Eleven patients (32 %) had stable disease, 1 patient (3 %) partial response and 22 patients (66 %) progressive disease as their best response. There was no PK interaction between 2DG and docetaxel.

Conclusion

The recommended dose of 2DG in combination with weekly docetaxel is 63 mg/kg/day with tolerable adverse effects.     

A phase II trial of modified weekly irinotecan and cisplatin for chemotherapy-naïve patients with metastatic or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus

Purpose

This phase II study assessed the efficacy and toxicity profile of a modified weekly irinotecan and cisplatin for chemotherapy-naïve patients with metastatic/recurrent esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SQCC).

Methods

The eligibility criteria included histologically confirmed esophageal SQCC, no prior chemotherapy, adequate organ functions and written informed consent. Patients received irinotecan 65 mg/m² plus cisplatin 30 mg/m² on days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks.

Results

Thirty-two patients were assessed for response and toxicity. Ten patients achieved a partial response (31.3%; 95% CI, 16.0–50.0%). With a median follow-up of 19.0 months, median progression-free and overall survival was 4.4 and 9.6 months, respectively, with a 1-year survival rate of 27.4%. Grade (G) 3/4 neutropenia was observed in 50.0% of the patients, which was the most common cause of dose reduction or therapy delay. G3 non-hematologic toxicity included seven (21.9%) asthenias, four (12.5%) diarrheas, and one (3.1%) nausea/vomiting, but no G4 non-hematologic toxicity was observed.

Conclusions

This modified weekly irinotecan and cisplatin failed to ameliorate hematologic toxicity and to improve efficacy. However, easy administration and favorable non-hematologic toxicity as well as modest anti-tumor activity against metastatic or recurrent esophageal SQCC can make this regimen a potential treatment option, given the complexity of administration and toxicity of conventional infusional 5-FU and cisplatin.     

Sunitinib in combination with docetaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors: a phase I dose-escalation study

Purpose

Sunitinib in combination with docetaxel enhances antitumor activity in xenograft models of human breast and non-small cell lung cancer. We assessed the maximum tolerated doses (MTDs), safety, pharmacokinetic profiles, and preliminary efficacy of sunitinib plus docetaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Methods

In this phase I study, successive patient cohorts received sunitinib 25, 37.5, or 50 mg/day for 4 weeks of a 6-week cycle (Schedule 4/2, 4 weeks on, 2 weeks off) or for 2 weeks of a 3-week cycle (Schedule 2/1, 2 weeks on, 1 week off) with docetaxel 60 or 75 mg/m² IV q21d to determine the MTDs of this treatment combination.

Results

Fifty patients enrolled: 10 on Schedule 4/2 and 40 on Schedule 2/1. MTDs were established as sunitinib 25 mg on Schedule 4/2 with docetaxel 60 mg/m² q21d, and as sunitinib 37.5 mg on Schedule 2/1 with docetaxel 75 mg/m² q21d. On Schedule 2/1, the most frequent dose-limiting toxicity was neutropenia (±fever; grade [G]3/4, n = 5) and the most common G3/4 non-hematologic adverse event (AE) was fatigue (G3, n = 8). Hematologic AEs were managed with growth factor support in 11 of 23 (48%) patients treated at Schedule 2/1 MTD. Three patients achieved a partial response at the Schedule 2/1 MTD. There were no pharmacokinetic drug–drug interactions with either schedule.

Conclusions

Oral sunitinib 37.5 mg/day on Schedule 2/1 with docetaxel 75 mg/m² IV q21d is a clinically feasible regimen with a manageable safety profile, no pharmacokinetic drug–drug interactions, and shows antitumor activity in patients with advanced solid tumors.     

Carboplatin with weekly docetaxel and ifosfamide in advanced head and neck cancers: a phase I Brown University Oncology Group dose escalation study (HN-93)

Purpose

A phase I study was performed to determine the maximally tolerated dose of carboplatin, ifosfamide, and docetaxel in advanced head and neck cancers.

Methods

Carboplatin (week 1) was administered with weekly docetaxel and ifosfamide for 3 weeks in an every 4-week cycle. Restaging was done after two cycles, while dose level escalation was done in cohorts of three patients.

Results

Fifteen patients (recurrent/metastatic disease, n = 8; bulky locally advanced disease, n = 7) were enrolled. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed. Toxicities included grade 3 neutropenia and anemia (n = 2, each), and grade 2 thrombocytopenia (n = 3). The final level of carboplatin AUC = 6 (week 1) with docetaxel 30 mg/m² per week and ifosfamide 1,000 mg/m² per week was chosen for further evaluation.

Conclusions

This novel regimen of carboplatin with weekly docetaxel and ifosfamide has a favorable toxicity profile and is active in this setting. Phase II study results are awaited.     

Triplet combination with paclitaxel, cisplatin and 5-FU is effective in metastatic and/or recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Purpose

Platinum-based chemotherapy is the recognized first-line treatment for metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). However, no standard treatment regimens have been established. This phase II study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a paclitaxel, cisplatin and 5-FU combination in metastatic and/or recurrent NPC.

Methods

Patients with evaluable metastatic and/or recurrent NPC were entered into this study. Treatment consisted of paclitaxel at a dose of 135 mg/m² on day 1, cisplatin 25 mg/m²/day from day 1 to day 3 and 5-FU-continuous infusion for 120 h at a variable dosage from 600 to 1,000 mg/m²/day according to prior radiation. This regimen was repeated every 3 weeks.

Results

A total of 95 patients were enrolled; 92 patients were evaluable for response. The overall response and disease control rates were 78.9 and 93.6 %, respectively. At a median follow-up of 24.8 months, the respective median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival were 22.7 months (95 % CI 18.6–26.9 months) and 8.6 months (95 % CI 7.7–9.5 months). Toxicities were moderate and manageable. Grade 3/4 toxicities included leucopenia (14.7 %), neutropenia (17.9 %), anemia (3.2 %), thrombocytopenia (6.4 %), nausea (4.2 %), vomiting (9.5 %), stomatitis (9.5 %), diarrhea (3.2 %), aminotransferase (2.2 %) and sensory neuropathy (3.2 %).

Conclusion

Triplet combination chemotherapy with paclitaxel, cisplatin and 5-FU is an effective and safe option in the front-line treatment for recurrent and/or metastatic NPC. The encouraging results with high response rate and long OS suggest that this regimen might be especially considered where tumor shrinkage is required.     

A phase I trial of S-1 with concurrent radiotherapy in patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer

Background

The purpose of this phase I trial of S-1 chemotherapy in combination with pelvic radiotherapy for locally recurrent rectal cancer was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), recommended dose (RD), and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of S-1.

Methods

We enrolled 9 patients between April 2005 and March 2009. Radiotherapy (total dose, 60 Gy in 30 fractions) was given to the gross local recurrent tumor and pelvic nodal metastases using three-dimensional radiotherapy planning. We administered oral S-1 twice a day on days 1–14 and 22–35 during radiotherapy. The dose of S-1 was initially 60 mg/m²/day and was increased to determine the MTD and RD for this regimen.

Results

DLT appeared at dose level 2 (70 mg/m²/day) in 2 patients, who experienced grade 3 enterocolitis and consequently required suspension of S-1 administration for longer than 2 weeks. Hematological toxicity was mild and reversible. At the initial evaluation, complete regression and partial regression were seen in 1 patient (11%) and 2 patients (22%), respectively.

Conclusion

This phase I trial of S-1 chemotherapy with pelvic radiotherapy for locally recurrent rectal cancer revealed that the MTD for S-1 was 70 mg/m²/day and the RD was 60 mg/m²/day.     

Randomized trial of weekly docetaxel and cisplatin combined with concurrent 3DCRT in patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer

Objective

This randomized controlled clinical study was to assess and compare the efficacy and safety of two chemoradiotherapy regimens [cisplatin + 5-fluorouracil + 3 dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) and cisplatin + weekly docetaxel + 3DCRT] in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Methods

A total of seventy-four patients with clinical stages IIB to IIIB esophageal squamous cell carcinoma were enrolled. Chemotherapy for PF group comprised 5-fluorouracil at days 1–5 (250 mg/m²/d) and cisplatin (20 mg/m²) at days 1–3 of every 28-day cycle; full treatment course included 2 cycles. Chemotherapy for DP group comprised docetaxel (20 mg/m²) and cisplatin (20 mg/m²) at days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29, and 36. Both groups treated with concurrent 60 Gy 3DCRT at 200 cGy/d.

Results

Seventy-four patients were enrolled and 71 completed the planned treatment, with a follow-up rate of 95.94%. Short-term curative effect was not statistically significant between the two groups (P = 0.471). The 2-year survival rates were 65.7% and 61.1%, respectively (P = 0.806), 5 years survival rates were 34.29% and 27.78%, respectively (P = 0.221), and there was no significant difference by Fisher test (P = 0.734). As common side effects, incidence rates of radioactive esophagitis and hematological toxicity were lower in DP group.

Conclusion

For locally advanced esophageal cancer patients, current chemoradiotherapy with chemotherapy regimen of weekly docetaxel plus cisplatin has equal curative effect with 5-fluorouracil plus cisplatin, but well-tolerated by reducing side effects such as radioactive esophagitis and bone marrow suppression.     

FOLFIRI as second-line chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer: a GISCAD multicenter phase II study

Purpose

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the activity and the tolerability of the FOLFIRI regimen, administered as second-line chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer after the failure of a gemcitabine-based regimen.

Methods

Patients with locally advanced/metastatic disease who received a first-line chemotherapy (one line only) with gemcitabine ± platinoid (cisplatin, oxaliplatin) and who had measurable disease conform with the RECIST criteria were eligible for the study. FOLFIRI consists of irinotecan 180 mg/m² iv on day 1, leucovorin (l-form) 200 mg/m² iv on day 1 and 2, 5-FU 400 mg/m² iv bolus on days 1 and 2, and 5-FU 600 mg/m² iv by ci for 22 h on days 1 and 2, repeated every 2 weeks. The primary end point was the response rate.

Results

Among the 50 enrolled patients, 4 partial responses (PR) (8 %) and 14 stable diseases were observed, for a disease control rate of 18/50 (36 %). Forty-one patients (82 %) have been pretreated with cisplatin/oxaliplatin+gemcitabine as first-line chemotherapy. The median progression-free and overall survivals were 3.2 and 5 months, respectively. The 6-month survival rate was 32 %. Grade 3–4 neutropenia and diarrhea occurred in 10 (20 %) and 6 (12 %) patients, respectively.

Conclusion

The FOLFIRI regimen showed a modest clinical activity in this quite heavily pretreated patients’ population with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer with a manageable toxicity profile.     

Phase II study of docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-FU induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer

Purpose

This study sought to determine the feasibility and safety of induction chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) triple combination chemotherapy (TPF) followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC).

Methods

Patients with advanced NPC were treated with three cycles of induction chemotherapy. Docetaxel (70 mg/m²) and cisplatin (75 mg/m²) were given on day 1, followed by 5-FU (1,000 mg/m²) as a continuous infusion for 4 days. After induction chemotherapy, cisplatin was given at a dose of 100 mg/m² every 3 weeks with radiotherapy.

Results

Thirty-three patients were enrolled; all patients were stage III (n = 4, 12.1%) or IV (n = 29, 87.9%). Among the patients, 32 patients completed both induction TPF therapy and CCRT, with responses as follows: five patients (15.2%) achieved a complete response (CR), and 27 patients (81.8%) a partial response (PR). At 6 weeks after CCRT, 23 patients (69.7%) had a CR and 9 patients (27.3%) a PR. The 3-year progression-free survival was 75.6% and the 3-year overall survival was 86.1%. Neutropenia (72.7%), febrile neutropenia (9.1%), and nausea (9.1%) were the most severe toxicities (grade 3–4) during induction chemotherapy, and mucositis (39.4%), fatigue (15.2%), and nausea (9.1%) were the most common toxicities (grade 3–4) during CCRT.

Conclusions

Although most patients had stage IV NPC, the TPF induction chemotherapy followed by CCRT showed promising activity with manageable toxicity. These results demonstrated the possibility of effective treatment with the aim of not only a palliative, but also a curative, approach to the treatment of advanced NPC.