Triplet chemotherapy combination with gemcitabine,cisplatin and ifosfamide in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: phase II study

A phase II study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the combination GIP (gemcitabine, ifosfamide, and cisplatin) for the treatment of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Thirty patients with stage III B/IV NSCLC were treated with a combination of GIP. Patients received gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 administered intravenously on days 1 and 8, ifosfamide 3,500 mg/m2 on day 2, and cisplatin 80 mg/m2 on day 2, repeated every 21 days. Two of the 30 patients (7%) showed a complete response and 14 patients (46%) showed a partial response. The overall response rate was 53%. The estimated median survival for all patients was 60 weeks. All patients enrolled onto the study were eligible for toxicity assessment. Toxicities were treatable and included World Health Organization grade III or IV leukopenia (29%), thrombocytopenia (18%), anemia (7%) and nausea, and vomiting (6%). Febrile neutropenia occurred in 3 of 30 patients. There were no treatment-related deaths. The combination therapy of GIP is active, well tolerated, and easy to administer on an outpatient basis in advanced NSCLC.     

A phase II trial of the combination of gemcitabine, ifosfamide and cisplatin in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVE: This phase II trial was designed to assess the efficacy and toxicity profile of the combination of gemcitabine, ifosfamide and cisplatin (GIP) in the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients included in the study were those with surgically unresectable or metastatic NSCLC, with bidimensionally measurable disease, a Karnofsky performance status > 60, and who had not received previous chemotherapy. Treatment consisted of 1000 mg/m(2) gemcitabine on days 1 and 8, 3 g/m(2) ifosfamide on day 1, and 50 mg/m(2) cisplatin on day 1, administered in 21-day cycles. A maximum of six cycles were administered. RESULTS: Between March 1996 and December 1997, 60 patients were included in the study (37 stage III and 23 stage IV), of which 59 were evaluated for response. An objective response was obtained in 43% of patients (3% complete and 40% partial responses), whereas 22% had stable disease. The median survival time for the whole group was 52 weeks (65 weeks in patients with stage III, and 35 weeks in stage IV). The most frequent toxicity was haematological, 56% of patients presented grade 3 or 4 myelotoxicity in one of the cycles, although only seven episodes of febrile neutropenia were recorded in the 255 cycles administered. CONCLUSIONS: The GIP regimen attains response rates similar to those obtained with the gemcitabine plus cisplatin combination used in advanced NSCLC, and had an acceptable toxicity profile.     

Gemcitabine, ifosfamide, cisplatin (GIP) for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase II study of the italian oncology group for clinical research (GOIRC)

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the activity and the toxicity of the combination of gemcitabine with ifosfamide and cisplatin (GIP) in chemonaive patients with advanced non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Eighty chemonaive patients with Stage IIIB-IV NSCLC were treated with the combination of gemcitabine 1 g/m(2) on Days 1 and 8, ifosfamide 2 g/m(2) on Day 1 and cisplatin 80 mg/m(2) on Day 2. Cycles were administered on an outpatient basis every 3 weeks. Hematologic toxicity was the main side effect; Grade III-IV thrombocytopenia was observed in 54 (67%) patients and Grade III-IV leucopenia in 44 (55%) patients, with 4 episodes of febrile neutropenia and 1 toxic death. Thirteen patients received platelet transfusions and 38 were transfused with packed red cells. All patients were evaluable for response. The overall response rate was 54% (95% confidence interval 43 to 65%) with 1 complete response. In patients with Stage IIIB and IV disease, response rates were 58% and 52%, respectively. Median time to progression was 40 weeks (range 0-114) and median overall survival was 12 months (16.6 months for stage IIIB and 10.4 months for stage IV). Median and minimum follow-up were 19 and 12 months, respectively. The GIP combination shows a response rate and overall survival of clinical interest. Hematologic toxicity was the main toxic effect, especially in patients with low performance status. This regimen will be tested in a Phase III randomized trial.     

Phase I-II study of gemcitabine and paclitaxel in pretreated patients with stage IIIB-IV non-small cell lung cancer

Gemcitabine and paclitaxel are among the most active new agents in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and are worth considering for second-line chemotherapy. In this phase I–II study, we combined gemcitabine and paclitaxel for second-line treatment of advanced NSCLC. Gemcitabine doses were kept fixed at 1000 mg/m² on day 1 and 8, and paclitaxel doses were escalated from 90 mg/m² on day 1 of the 21-day cycle. Thirty-seven patients were treated at six different dose levels. Grade 4 neutropenia was dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), since it occurred in two out of six patients treated at paclitaxel 240 mg/m²; the paclitaxel dose level just below (210 mg/m²) was selected for phase II evaluation. Non-hematologic toxicity was mild. One complete response (CR) (3%) and 13 partial responses (PR) (36%) were observed in 36 evaluable patients for an overall response rate of 39% (95% C.I., 23–57%). Median duration of response was 35 weeks (range, 8–102). All of the observed objective responses occurred in the 19 patients who had previously responded to the first-line therapy. Median survival was 40 weeks (range, 8–108 weeks). The combination of gemcitabine and paclitaxel is a feasible, well-tolerated, and active scheme for second-line treatment of advanced NSCLC; further evaluation, at least in selected patients, such as those previously responding to first-line chemotherapy, is definitely warranted.     

Phase II study of regimen of gemcitabine and cisplatin in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND: Cisplatin-based chemotherapy is the standard treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Many novel drugs, including gemcitabine, navelbine, paclitaxel and docetaxel have been used in combination with cisplatin. Of these drugs, gemcitabine is reported to have a high response rate and acceptable toxicity. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin. METHODS: Thirty-two patients with NSCLC, who met the selection criteria from June 1998 to January 1999, were enrolled. All of them were confirmed by histology and were in an advanced stage, i.e. stage IIIB with pleural effusion or stage IV. Cisplatin at a dose of 80 mg/m2 was given monthly on day 15, in combination with gemcitabine at a dose of 1000 mg/m2 administered on days 1, 8 and 15 of the 28-day cycle. RESULTS: Of the 32 assessable patients, two showed complete remission and 11 achieved partial remission. The overall response was 40.6% (95% CI, 24.8-56.4%). The median time to disease progression was 7.2 months (95% CI, 4.87-9.53 months). The major hematological toxicity was neutropenia. Seven patients (22.9%) developed grade 3 and 4 neutropenia, but none developed febrile neutropenia. One patient (3.1%) had grade 3 thrombocytopenia. One patient (3.1%) developed grade 3 anemia. Nausea and vomiting were seen in 12 patients (37.5%). CONCLUSIONS: The regimen of combined gemcitabine with cisplatin is safe and effective. With this combination, a lower dose of cisplatin seems to have an efficacy similar to that in previous reports.     

A phase II study of a novel gemcitabine plus cisplatin regimen administered every three weeks for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Background: The aim of this study was to determine the clinical activity and toxicity of a novel chemotherapy combination regimen of gemcitabine plus cisplatin, administered every three weeks, in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Patients and methods: Twenty-six previously untreated stages III (14) and IV (12) patients were included. Gemcitabine was administered on days 1 and 8 at a dose of 1250 mg/m² and cisplatin was administered at a dose of 100 mg/m² on day 1, every 21 days.Results: Twenty-five patients were evaluable for response. One patient achieved a complete response, and 16 patients partial responses. The overall response rate was 65.3% (95% CI: 45%–82%). The main toxicity was hematological: neutropenia NCIC-CTC grade 3–4 in 54% of the patients, and thrombocytopenia grade 3–4 in 23%. The non-hematological toxicity was mild and tolerable. Only 13% of gemcitabine injections were dose-reduced or omitted due to toxicity. The actual dose-intensity of gemcitabine was 715 mg/m²/week, and 31 mg/m²/week for cisplatin. These figures represent the 86% and 93% of the theoretical dose intensity of both drugs, respectively. With a median follow-up of 10 months (range 7–13), 17 patients are still alive and nine have died. The median overall survival is 12 months.Conclusion: This novel combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin administered every three weeks is well tolerated and induces a remarkably high response rate. The regimen proves more interesting than the four-week schedules, particularly regarding patients who are candidates for local therapy.     

The development of gemcitabine and carboplatin in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer

Gemcitabine plus carboplatin is a widely used regimen for the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This two drug combination is effective, with a favorable safety profile, and is well tolerated in the outpatient setting. Gemcitabine/carboplatin prolongs survival compared with gemcitabine alone, but with greater hematological toxicity. The combination regimen appears to be superior to or equally effective as other regimens including mitomycin, ifosfamide and cisplatin (MIC), cisplatin/vinblastine, gemcitabine/paclitaxel, paclitaxel/carboplatin and gemcitabine/cisplatin. Gemcitabine combined with carboplatin is associated with more hematological toxicity, but the incidence of non-hematological toxicity is often significantly lower. Gemcitabine/carboplatin also improves patient quality of life, supporting its use in treating patients with advanced NSCLC in the outpatient setting.     

A phase II trial of tamoxifen, ifosfamide, epirubicin, and cisplatin combination chemotherapy for inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer

A phase II trial of tamoxifen, ifosfamide, epirubicin, and cisplatin (TIEP) chemotherapy was conducted in patients with chemonaive inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to assess response and toxicity. From October 1997 to August 1998, 19 patients were treated. The treatment schema included tamoxifen 60 mg twice daily by mouth on days 1 to 3, ifosfamide 3 g/m2 intravenous infusion (IV) 60 minutes with mesna on day 2, epirubicin 50 mg/m2 IV bolus on day 2, and cisplatin 60 mg/m2 IV 60 minutes on day 2 every 4 weeks for up to six cycles. All patients were evaluable for response and toxicity. The major toxicity was myelosuppression; grade 3 or 4 leukopenia or neutropenia occurred in 14 of 19 (73.7%) patients during treatment, and 6 patients (31.6%) experienced fever in association with the neutropenia; no toxic deaths occurred. Grade 3 anemia occurred in six patients (31.6%) during the treatment. Grade 3 or 4 nausea/vomiting occurred in only one patient. Toxicities other than neutropenia and anemia were minimal. After two cycles of treatment, 9 of 19 patients attained a partial response (47.4%, 95% confidence interval 24.9%-69.9%) in this study. The median time to disease progression was 6 months and median survival time was 12 months. We conclude that TIEP is an active combination regimen with an acceptable toxicity profile in Chinese patients with inoperable NSCLC.     

Phase I study with dose escalation of gemcitabine and cisplatin in combination with ifosfamide (GIP) in patients with non-small-cell lung carcinoma

Gemcitabine (G) and cisplatin (P) are active reference agents in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Ifosfamide (I) has also been approved for NSCLC treatment. This phase I trial aimed to determine the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), maximum tolerated dose [maximum tolerated dosage (MTD)], and recommended dose (RD) of a GIP combination in patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC. In this study, one cycle of chemotherapy combined the following: ifosfamide: 3 g/m2 fixed dose (24-hour intravenous infusion) combined with mesna, day 1; gemcitabine: starting dose 1,000 mg/m2/d, escalating by 250 mg/m2 increments, days 1 and 15; cisplatin: starting dose 80 mg/m2, subsequently 100 mg/m2, day 15; in cohorts of at least 3 patients. Cycles were repeated every 28 days and no hematopoietic growth factors were administered. DLT was evaluated after the first chemotherapy cycle. Thirty-three patients (30 men, 3 women) with stage III (14 patients)/IV (19 patients) NSCLC were treated at eight dose levels, receiving 109 cycles of chemotherapy. Neutropenia was the only DLT reported. Although the MTD was not reached at the highest tested dose level, the RD chosen corresponds to the full doses of the GP3000 doublet standard (G: 3,000 mg/m2; P: 100 mg/m2 per cycle) every 28 days. Nonhematologic toxicities were mainly grade I-II. Relative dose intensities of G, I, and P at the RD were 96%, 98%, and 96%, respectively. Sixteen of 33 patients with measurable/evaluable disease had an objective response including two complete responses. In conclusion, GIP chemotherapy is safe and appears to be active in patients with NSCLC. The RD is gemcitabine: 1,500 mg/m2 days 1 and 15; ifosfamide: 3 g/m2 day 1; cisplatin: 100 mg/m2 day 15. A confirmatory phase II study is currently under way, before a phase III trial of GIP versus GP.     

Phase II study of tamoxifen, ifosfamide, epirubicin and cisplatin combination chemotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer failing previous chemotherapy

We conducted a phase II study of tamoxifen, ifosfamide, epirubicin, and cisplatin (TIEP) chemotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who had failed previous chemotherapy, in order to assess the response and toxicity of TIEP. Between November 1997 and May 1999, 25 patients were treated. Twelve of the 25 patients (48%) had been previously treated with cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy. TIEP doses were tamoxifen 60 mg oral twice daily on days 1-3; ifosfamide 2.4 g/m(2) intravenous infusion (IV) 60 min with mesna on day 2; epirubicin 40 mg/m(2) IV bolus on day 2; and cisplatin 50 mg/m(2) IV 60 min on day 2 every 4 weeks for up to six cycles. Seventy one cycles were given to 25 patients, with a median of three cycles (range one to six cycles). All patients were evaluable for toxicity profile and response rate. As expected, the major toxicity was myelosuppression. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurred in 15 patients (60%) during treatment, as well as in 31% of the total courses. Febrile neutropenia occurred in two patients. No toxic death occurred in this study. Grade 3 thrombocytopenia occurred in five patients with five cycles. Toxicities other than myelosuppression were few and mild in severity. After two cycles of treatment, five of 25 patients (20%) had a partial response (95% confidence interval 4.3-35.7%). Among 12 patients previously treated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy, three patients (25%) achieved a partial response. The median time to disease progression was 4.9 months and median survival was 7.7 months. The response rate and median survival were better than in our previous study of salvage chemotherapy with ifosfamide, 5-FU, and leucovorin; and with ifosfamide, epirubicin, 5-FU, and leucovorin. In conclusion, TIEP appears to be an active combination regimen with an acceptable toxicity profile in Chinese patients with NSCLC who have failed previous chemotherapy.     

Phase II trial of cisplatin and gemcitabine in advanced squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck

Background: To evaluate the toxicity profile and efficacy of cisplatin combined with gemcitabine in patients with irresectable locally recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.Patients and methods: Gemcitabine was given at a dose of 800 mg/m2 on days 1, 8 and 15, plus cisplatin at a dose of 50 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8; every four weeks.Results: Twenty-four patients with a median age of 59 years (range 42–74) were included. All patients were evaluable for toxicity and 22 patients were assessable for response. Eleven cases had advanced recurrent locoregional disease while 13 patients had metastatic disease. One CR (4.7%) and four PR (18%) were observed, for an overall response rate of 22.7% (95% CI: 8%–42%). The main toxicity was hematological: neutropenia grade 3–4 in 28% of the cycles and thrombocytopenia grade 3–4 in 16%. The most significant non-hematological toxicity was asthenia grade 2–3 in 24% of the cycles.Conclusions: This cisplatin plus gemcitabine combination schedule has a favourable toxicity profile with a discrete activity in patients with locally recurrent or metastatic squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck.     

Phase II study of vinorelbine/ifosfamide/cisplatin for the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE:: to evaluate the combination of vinorelbine, ifosfamide and cisplatin(VIP) in patients with advanced nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS:: Seventy-six untreated patients with stages IIIB-IV NSCLC; thechemotherapy regimen consisted of vinorelbine (25 mg/sqm ondays 1 and 8), ifosfamide (3 g/sqm on day 1 with uroprotectivemesna), and cisplatin (80 mg/sqm on day 1). The cycles wereadministered on an out patient basis every 3 weeks. RESULTS:: Leukopenia was the most frequent toxicity: grades 3–4neutropenia was observed in 26% of the cycles and 19 episodesof febrile neutropenia were reported in 289 evaluable courses.Filgrastim 5 µg/kg was administered in 27% of the courses.Sixty-seven of 76 patients were evaluable for response: theoverall response rate was 51% (95% confidence interval 35%–%)with 2 complete responses (3%) and 32 (48%) partial responses.No significant differences in response rate were observed accordingto histology or stage of disease. The median time to progressionwas 6 months (range 1 to 29+) and the median overall survival10 months (range 1–33+). CONCLUSION:: The combination of vinorelbine, ifosfamide and cisplatin inthe dose and schedule employed in this trial shows an interestingresponse rate with acceptable toxicities. This regimen shouldbe tested in the multimodality therapy of stage IIIA/B NSCLC. vinorelbine, ifosfamide, cisplatin, non-small-cell, lung cancer     

Weekly gemcitabine and cisplatin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: A phase II study

Background: The combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin has proven effective in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the optimal schedule for administration of the two drugs has not yet been determined. In this study we evaluated the activity and toxicity of a weekly gemcitabine and cisplatin schedule.Patients and methods: Thirty-six untreated patients with stage IIIB–IV NSCLC entered the study. Treatment consisted of gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 i.v. and cisplatin 35 mg/m2 i.v., both given weekly on days 1, 8, and 15, followed by one week of rest.Results: Ninety-seven courses (273 weekly administrations) were delivered. The median dose-intensity was 612 mg/m2 per week for gemcitabine (82%) and 21 mg/m2 per week for cisplatin (80%). All 36 of the patients were evaluable for toxicity, and 30 for response. Partial remissions were observed in 12 patients, for an overall response rate of 40% (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 22.5%–57.5%). Most of the partial remissions were seen in IIIB patients (54% of the stage IIIB and 22% of the stage IV patients responded). According to the intent-to-treat principle, the response rate was 33.3% (12 of 36 patients). The median response duration was 9.9 months (range 4–23) and the median survival time 11.8 months (range 1–24). World Health Organization (WHO) grade 3–4 myelotoxicity was: thrombocytopenia in nine patients (25%), neutropenia in six (16.6%) and anemia in six (16.6%); there was very little additional major toxicity.Conclusions: This regimen appears to be active and to have a favourable toxicity profile.     

Preoperative chemotherapy with cisplatin in combination with docetaxel and gemcitabine in locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Despite surgery, both locoregional and distant disease controls remain poor in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Preoperative chemotherapy has become an accepted treatment but no established regimen exists. Our objective was to define the activity and feasibility of cisplatin in combination with docetaxel and gemcitabine in stage III NSCLC followed by surgery or radiotherapy. Thirty-two chemotherapy-naive patients with NSCLC (59% stage IIIAN2, 41% stage IIIB) received cisplatin 75 mg/m² on day 1, gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m² on days 1 and 8, and docetaxel 20 mg/m² on days 1, 8 and 15. Patients received induction chemotherapy (3 cycles) before re-evaluation, followed by thoracotomy or thoracic radiotherapy. Radiographic response was 50% and stable disease at computed tomography (CT) scan was observed in 30% of patients. Thirty patients were evaluable for response; thoracotomy was performed in 16 patients (53%) and resection was complete in 8 patients (27%). Grade 3/4 neutropenia, the main hematologic toxicity, occurred in 53% of patients but only 3 patients required hospitalization due to neutropenic fever. Severe non-hematologic toxicity was uncommon. There were 3 treatment-related deaths. To date, 22% of patients remain alive and disease-free with a median follow-up of 13 months. Median survival for all recruited patients was 14 months, with an estimated 1-year survival rate of 60%. The combination of cisplatin/docetaxel/gemcitabine is a welltolerated regimen. Although it has potential serious toxic effects, high response rates and manageable toxicity justify its use in further trials. The Spanish Lung Cancer Group (SLCG) is currently performing a trial with this regimen in stage III disease.     

吉西他滨联合顺铂治疗30例非小细胞肺癌

目的:评价吉西他滨联合顺铂治疗非小细胞肺癌的疗效及毒副作用。方法:30例晚期非小细胞肺癌,初治14例,复治16例,采用吉西他滨1000mg/m2,第1、8天静脉滴注。顺铂:80mg/m2,分3天静脉滴注,21天为1个周期,至少连用2个周期。结果:部分缓解(PR)14例,无变化(NC)13例,病变进展(PD)3例,有效率为46.67%。主要毒副反应为骨髓抑止、恶心和呕吐等。结论:吉西他滨联合顺铂对治疗非小细胞肺癌有较好的临床疗效,毒副反应轻,易耐受。     

A phase III randomised trial comparing sequential chemotherapy using cisplatin-based regimen and paclitaxel to cisplatin-based chemotherapy alone in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to determine whether in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the sequential administration of cisplatin-based chemotherapy and paclitaxel (Taxol) is superior to a cisplatin-based chemotherapy, followed by paclitaxel as salvage treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 485 chemotherapy naive patients with advanced NSCLC were treated with three courses of GIP (gemcitibine + ifosfamide + cisplatin), consisting of cisplatin 50 mg/m(2) on day 1, ifosfamide 3 g/m(2) on day 1 and gemcitabine 1 g/m(2) on days 1 and 8. Patients with nonprogressive disease were then randomised to further similar courses of GIP or courses of paclitaxel (225 mg/m(2) over 3 h every 3 weeks). RESULTS: Objective response or nonprogression after induction GIP occurred in 174 and 115 patients, respectively. After randomisation, there were 140 patients in the GIP arm and 141 in the paclitaxel arm. In terms of postrandomisation survival, there was no statistically significant difference (P = 0.17) between the two arms. Median times were 9.7 [95% confidence interval (CI) 7.8-11.6] and 11.9 (95% CI 9.4-14.3) months for paclitaxel and GIP, respectively. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that sex and haemoglobin were independent prognostic factors. After adjustment for these factors, the observed hazard ratio was 0.81 (95% CI 0.63-1.04) in favour of GIP (P = 0.10). Toxicity was tolerable; there was a significantly higher rate of grades III/IV thrombocytopenia with GIP and more alopecia with paclitaxel. CONCLUSION: Sequential chemotherapy using cisplatin-based regimen followed by paclitaxel does not result in better outcome than cisplatin-based chemotherapy using taxane as salvage treatment.     

低剂量持续静脉滴注吉西他滨一线治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床研究

背景与目的:目前已将吉西他滨联合顺铂作为晚期非小细胞肺癌的一线化疗方案,吉西他滨的常规使用剂量和方法是1000mg/m2半小时静脉滴注,第1、8天,每3周为一个疗程。本研究旨在评价低剂量吉西他滨持续6h静脉滴注联合顺铂一线治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的有效性和安全性。方法:48例经病理和/或细胞学检查确诊、未经化疗的晚期非小细胞肺癌患者,采用吉西他滨250mg/m2持续静脉滴注6h,第1、8天,顺铂75mg/m2,每3周为一疗程,连续使用2疗程以上。结果:48例患者中46例可评价疗效,所有患者可评价不良反应。完全缓解率2.2%,部分缓解率30.3%,总有效率为32.5%,中位治疗至进展时间为5.1个月,中位生存时间为10.2个月,1年生存率36.6%。白细胞减少发生率为60.4%,血小板减少发生率为39.5%,Ⅲ～Ⅳ度的白细胞和血小板减少发生率分别为20.8%和12.5%。结论:低剂量吉西他滨持续6h静脉滴注联合顺铂一线治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌疗效确切、不良反应轻。     

Gemcitabine and vinorelbine as second-line therapy in non-small-cell lung cancer after prior treatment with taxane+platinum-based regimens

Treatment options in patients with recurrent non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remain limited as a result of the poor activity of older agents after platinum-based therapy. The present phase II study aimed to evaluate the combination of gemcitabine and vinorelbine in patients with relapsed NSCLC after pretreatment with taxane+platinum-based regimens, since gemcitabine has demonstrated activity in that setting and the combination has been well tolerated in previous phase I/II studies. Patients with advanced NSCLC (stages III/IV), World Health Organization (WHO), Performance Status (PS) < or = 2, prior platinum+taxane-based chemotherapy and unimpaired haematopoietic and organ function were eligible. Chemotherapy was administered as follows: vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2) followed by gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2), both administered on days 1 and 8, recycled every 3 weeks. 40 patients were entered and 39 were evaluable for response and all 40 for toxicity: median age was 61 years (range 50-72 years), median PS=1 (range 0-2), gender ratio=37 males/3 females, stages at initial diagnoses were IIIA=2, IIIB=14, IV=24. Metastatic sites included: lymph nodes: 23, bone: 4, liver: 5, brain: 4, lung nodules: 9, adrenals: 8, pleural effusion: 4. 22 patients had prior paclitaxel/ifosfamide/cisplatin treatment. Objective responses were; partial response (PR): 9/40 (22.5%), stable disease (SD): 13/40 (32.5%) and progressive disease (PD) 18/40 (45%). The median time-to-progression (TTP) was 4.5 months (range 1-17 months) and median survival 7 months (range 2-17+ months). 1-year survival was 17%. Grade 3 neutropenia was seen in 33% of patients. There was no grade 4 neutropenia and no episodes of febrile neutropenia. No grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia or grade 3/4 other non-haematological toxicities were observed. The combination of gemcitabine/vinorelbine is active and well tolerated in patients with advanced NSCLC failing prior taxane/platinum therapy. This regimen represents a tolerable and effective combination to apply in the palliative treatment of relapsed NSCLC.     

Ifosfamide, vinorelbine and gemcitabine in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. A phase I study

The objective of this phase I study was to identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and toxicity of a three drug, platinum-free regimen, including gemcitabine, ifosfamide and vinorelbine, in the treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). 33 chemotherapy-na?ve patients with histologically confirmed, unresectable NSCLC, received fixed doses of ifosfamide (1500 mg/m2 days 1-3 with mesna) and vinorelbine (25 mg/m2 days 3 and 8). The gemcitabine dose was escalated from 500 to 1200 mg/m2 on days 3 and 8 every third week. The escalation was stopped at dose level 4 (gemcitabine 1200 mg/m2) since all 3 patients of this cohort showed dose-limiting thrombocytopenia and/or neutropenia at treatment cycle 1. The dose recommended for phase II trials is: gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 and vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 given on days 3 and 8 plus ifosfamide 1500 mg/m2 on days 1-3. An encouraging response rate of 50% (95% confidence interval (CI): 32-68%) was observed in 32 patients evaluated. Our results show that ifosfamide, vinorelbine and gemcitabine can be safely administered as outpatient chemotherapy for NSCLC. Myelosuppression is the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of this regimen with no major subjective side-effects observed.     

A dose-escalation study of irinotecan (CPT-11) in combination with cisplatin in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer previously treated with a docetaxel-based front line chemotherapy

Purpose: A phase I study was conducted to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of a CPT-11 plus cisplatin combination as salvage treatment in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients and methods: Twenty-two patients with histologically confirmed NSCLC, who had failed taxotere-based front-line chemotherapy, were enrolled. The patients’ median age was 61 years, 19 (86%) were male, and 17 (77%) had a performance status (World Health Organization (WHO)) 0–1. CPT-11 was administered as a 60-min i.v. infusion at a fixed dose of 100 mg/m² on day 1 and at escalating doses on day 8, starting from 100 mg/m² with increments of 10 mg/m² ; cisplatin was administered at a fixed dose of 80 mg/m² on day 8, 2 h after CPT-11 administration. Treatment was repeated every 3 weeks. Results: At the dose of CPT-11 120 mg/m² , three out of four enrolled patients presented DLTs (grade 4 neutropenia, febrile neutropenia and delayed diarrhea); the addition of G-CSF at this level did not permit further dose-escalation. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was observed in 12 (18%) cycles, febrile neutropenia in four (6%), and grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia in four (6%). Grade 3/4 diarrhea was seen in six (29%) patients, and grade 2/3 nausea and vomiting in 12 (57%). Neurotoxicity grade 2 was observed in six (29%) patients and grade 3 in one (5%). Other toxicities were mild. The MTD was CPT-11 100 mg/m² on day 1 and 110 mg/m² on day 8 in combination with CDDP 80 mg/m² on day 8. Among 12 patients evaluable for response, partial response was achieved in two (16.7%) patients and stable disease in five (41.7%). Conclusion: The combination of CPT-11 and cisplatin has substantial but manageable toxicity and marginal activity as salvage treatment of patients with NSCLC who have failed taxotere-based front-line chemotherapy; further investigation is warranted to define its precise role in the second-line setting.