Preemptive Living Donor Renal Transplantation: A Single-Center Experience

Renal transplantation is considered preemptive if it occurs before initiation of dialysis. In our experience and in the literature, preemptive transplantation has been shown not only to reduce the costs of renal replacement therapy but also to avoid the long-term adverse effects of dialysis. Preemptive renal transplantation therefore is associated with better survival of both the allograft and the recipient. Our aim was to evaluate the outcomes of preemptive renal transplantation experience at our center. Since 1985, 1385 renal transplantations have been performed at our center. We retrospectively analyzed the 16/1385 recipients (11 male, 5 female) of overall mean age of 28.5 ± 15 years who underwent preemptive procedures. The causes of end-stage renal failure were focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (n = 5), vesicular ureteral reflux (n = 4), Berger disease (n = 2), polycystic renal disease (n = 2), and others (n = 3). Ten patients were adults, the remaining six, children. The mean creatinine clearance and plasma creatinine levels of the recipients before renal transplantation were 13.5 ± 8.5 mL/min and 6.7 ± 2.4 mg/dL, respectively. All renal transplantations were performed from living related donors. The mean preoperative serum creatinine levels, mean glomerular filtration rate, and creatinine clearance rates of the donors were 0.8 ± 0.1 mg/dL, 61.6 ± 6.5 mL/min, and 112.5 12 mL/min, respectively. Two episodes of acute cellular rejection and one of humoral rejection occurred during a mean follow-up of 48.7 ± 14 months (range = 25-76 months). The two patients who experienced graft losses due to humoral rejection or chronic rejection were retransplanted 2 and 48 months thereafter, respectively. At this time all patients are alive with good renal function. In conclusion, our single-center results are promising for preemptive renal transplantation as the optimal, least-expensive mode of treatment for end-stage renal disease.     

Utilization of elderly donors in living related kidney transplantation

Kidney transplantation has become the treatment of choice for end-stage renal disease. However, its application is limited due to inadequate organ supply, mainly because many dialysis patients do not have suitable living donors. The increasing discrepancy between organ supply and demand has forced many transplant centers to consider using organs procured from marginal donors. The aim of this study was to investigate whether utilization of kidneys from living related elderly donors is safe for the recipients in the long term. We analyzed the clinical results of 296 consecutive recipients of living related renal transplants, among whom 44 recipients received kidneys from donors over 60 years of age. By the end of 12 months, the mean serum creatinine level of the recipients who were transplanted from the older donors was higher (1.55 +/- 0.45 mg/dL) than that from other donors (1.21 +/- 0.3 mg/dL), but the difference was not significant (P = .08). In the long term (60 months), the graft function was similar (1.88 +/- 0.55 vs 1.52 +/- 0.38) for both groups. The similarity in outcomes of ideal versus older donors as shown less in the present series has encouraged us to utilize elderly living donors. We concluded that transplantations performed from the elderly donors yielded similar results to those of conventional donors. The long waiting list for transplantation, the treatment of choice for end-stage renal disease, should encourage us to be more flexible about donor selection.     

Preemptive kidney transplant from deceased donors: an advantage in relation to reduced waiting list

BACKGROUND: Preemptive living donor kidney transplantation is associated with better allograft and recipient survival. However, it remains unclear whether preemptive transplantation from deceased donors is beneficial too. An increased number of deceased donors has reduced the waiting list in our hospital in the last years allowing preemptive deceased donor kidney transplantation (PDDKT). AIM: We compared our experience with preemptive transplantation with patients who underwent dialysis before transplantation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-three PDDKT, including 77.5% male patients of overall mean age of 48 +/- 14 years, were performed in our hospital between January 1999 and December 2004 (8% of transplantations). We compared the outcomes of these patients with those of renal transplants in subjects who had undergone dialysis. The donors for both groups had similar characteristic; they were paired donor kidneys in most cases. RESULTS: The types of donors in both groups were: non-heart-beating (49%), heart-beating deceased (27%) or en bloc pediatric (24%). The serum creatinine of the recipients was 6.9 +/- 1.8 mg/dL prior to transplantation, and the creatinine clearance was 14.6 +/- 3.6 mL/min (estimated by the Cockroft-Gault formula). The Charlson comorbidity index adapted for patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (ACKD) was 0.8 +/- 0.2 in the preemptive group versus 1.7 +/- 0.4 in the dialysis group (P < .05). Delayed graft function rates were 0% versus 25% in preemptive vs dialysis groups, respectively. No differences in 1-month or 1-year renal function as determined by serum creatinine were observed between the groups. We did not observe differences in the incidence of acute rejection or 1- and 2-year graft and patient survivals. CONCLUSION: PDDKT is the treatment of choice for ACKD. It is associated with less delayed graft function and similar 2-year graft and patient survivals than kidney transplantation after dialysis. The Charlson index reflected less comorbidity among patients with PDDKT, a finding that must influence long-term outcomes.     

Living donor kidney transplantation from the elderly donor

PURPOSE: The organ shortage has led to increasing acceptance of living donation in all transplant centers. Although the risk of impaired long-term outcome seems to be greater using elderly donors, these organs are not generally refused for transplantation. We report our experience with 25 living donor kidney transplantations from donors older than 60 years. METHODS: Between 1995 and 2004, 124 living donor procedures were performed in our center from 83 related and 41 unrelated donors. Twenty-five donors (19 female, 6 male) were 60 years or older (mean, 65.3 +/- 3.9 years). The recipient included (10 females and 15 males) showed a higher degree of variance in age (46.1 +/- 14.6 years). The immunosuppressive protocol was cyclosporine (CyA)-based regimen in related cases and tacrolimus-based in unrelated cases. RESULTS: We transplanted 16 left and 9 right kidneys from older donors. The mean cold ischemia time was 171 +/- 64 minutes with a second warm ischemia time of 24 +/- 6 minutes. Severe arteriosclerosis made vascular reconstruction by graft interposition necessary in two recipients. The acute rejection rate was 20%. Two patients (8%) required dialysis in the early postoperative course, whereas initial function was excellent in 22 patients (88%). The mean serum creatinine concentration after 12 months was 1.6 +/- 0.3 mg/dL (n = 24) and 2.0 +/- 0.7 mg/dL (n = 16) at 4 years. In comparison, the mean creatinine concentration after 4 years in donors under 60 years was 1.6 +/- 0.9 mg/dL. Our analysis showed no significant difference in long-term graft function comparing young versus old donors in the setting of living donor transplants. CONCLUSION: Using living donors older than 60 years for transplantation is a feasible and safe option. The difference in long-term creatinine between young and old donors was not significant.     

Preemptive Kidney Transplantation—A Team Experience in Uruguay

Kidney transplantation is the best treatment for end-stage chronic renal disease. In Uruguay, the prevalence of patients on dialysis is 757 patients per millon inhabitants, plus 316 alive with a functioning renal graft. We install a preemptive renal transplantation program. Twenty-five patients received grafts without dialysis from 2004 to 2013, 5 receiving their 2nd transplantation and 17 from cadaveric donors, with 7.4 ± 7.7 months in the waiting list. At 24 months, patients' survival rate was 100% and the grafts' 97%, with a serum creatinine of 1.4 ± 0.6 mg%. The developed programs of dialysis and renal health care contributed install our preemptive kidney transplantation. Kidney transplantation should be proposed to selected patients with chronic renal failure as primary therapy of substitution of renal function.     

Impact of the Great Eastern Japan Earthquake on Transplant Renal Function in Iwaki City,Fukushima

Tokiwa-kai group is a urologic and dialysis institution complex located in Iwaki city, Fukushima, Japan, and has performed renal transplantation since 1997. Although water is mandatory for renal transplant recipients, the water supply did not work for approximately a month after the earthquake in Iwaki city. Moreover, after the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear accident struck Iwaki city, there was a critical shortage of food and medical supplies, including immunosuppressant drugs. Therefore, we investigated the impact of the Great Eastern Japan Earthquake on transplant renal function. We followed 30 patients who underwent renal transplantation before the Great Eastern Japan Earthquake. There were 19 males and 11 females with a mean age of 47 years. All recipients were not injured by the earthquake or the tsunami. Of the 30 recipients, 1 lost his renal graft at 12 months after the earthquake, and 1 has deterioration of graft function with a serum creatinine level of 5.5 mg/dL. Their creatinine levels before the earthquake were 2.79 mg/dL and 3.78 mg/dL, respectively. The other recipients have good graft function with a mean creatinine level of 1.5 mg/dL. All recipients did not experience any rejection episode after the earthquake. The shortage of water and food after the Great Eastern Japan Earthquake exacerbated the renal graft function, especially in the recipients with the lower graft function.     

Cadaveric renal transplantation: the Chennai experience

Transplantation of human organs is undoubtedly one of the greatest medical breakthroughs of this century. However, few Indian patients are able to benefit from this medical advance. It is estimated that in India every year over 152,000 people are diagnosed to have end-stage renal failure needing renal transplantation. The Transplantation of Human Organs Act passed by the Indian parliament in 1994 was subsequently ratified by the state legislature of Tamil Nadu in May 1995. It accepted brain death as a form of death and prohibited commerce in organs. The first cadaveric kidney transplant in Sri Ramachandra medical college was performed in 1995 with 68 cadaveric kidney transplants thereafter. The mean age of the donors was 36 +/- 12.8 years. The mean cold ischemia time was 5.6 +/- 3.2 hours. As many as 14 donors displayed acute renal failure (serum creatinine more than 1.2 mg/dL). Immediate graft function was established in 34 patients (50%). Four had graft rupture, two of which were successfully repaired. Postoperatively 12 patients (17.6%) displayed delayed graft function requiring dialysis. During the first year, 18 patients (26.4%) experienced acute rejection episodes, of which 14 were cellular and four vascular rejection types. As many as eight patients were lost to follow-up within one year; the mean follow-up time was 968 +/- 86 days. Patient survival at 1 year was 88.2% and that of the graft 73.5%. The 5-year patient and graft survival rates were 61.7% and 58.8%, respectively. The mean serum creatinine of patients currently followed is 2.2 +/- 0.86 mg/dL. The rate of cadaver kidney transplantation in India is low despite initiatives by our university to promote donation. Creating a positive public attitude, early brain death identification, and certification, prompt consent for organ donation, adequate hospital infrastructure, and support logistics are prerequisites for successful organ transplantation.     

Sirolimus experience in heart transplantation

INTRODUCTION: Sirolimus is a potent, nonnephrotoxic immunosuppressant with antiproliferative activity in nonimmune cells. Recent data support the conversion in late renal failure secondary to calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs), with limited experience in de novo regimens in patients with predictive factors of postoperative renal impairment. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated our experience of sirolimus-based immunosuppression administered to 25 heart transplant recipients. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 25 heart transplant recipients who received sirolimus included 17 conversions due to late CNI-related chronic renal dysfunction, six patients with a de novo regimen, and two patients who developed posttransplant pulmonary neoplasms. The conversion from CNI to sirolimus was started with 2 mg, with an average time after transplantation of 78 +/- 43 months and a mean baseline serum creatinine level of 2.1 +/- 0.45 mg/dL. The mean clinical follow-up was 17 +/- 9 months postconversion, and included echocardiography and laboratory studies. In the de novo group successive endomyocardial biopsies were performed during the first semester. RESULTS: Serum creatinine fell from 2.1 +/- 0.45 mg/dL to 1.8 +/- 0.51 mg/dL (P = .012). Mean sirolimus levels were 15 +/- 9 ng/mL (doses 2.2 +/- 0.4 mg). This improvement continued until 3 months (creatinine 1.5 +/- 0.35 P < .01)/sirolimus levels 11.7 +/- 5 ng/mL [1.9 +/- 0.7 mg]), with maintenance at 6 months (1.58 +/- 0.3 mg/dL/14 +/- 4 ng/mL [1.85 +/- 0.7 mg]) and 1-year postconversion (1.53 +/- 0.39 mg/dL; P = .019/10.7 +/- 2.5 ng/mL [1.5 +/- 0.7 mg]). De novo, after a mean follow-up of 13 months (range 3 to 35), sirolimus appeared to increase the incidence of a moderate histological grade of rejection without hemodynamic compromise. Side effects were common (63%), including peripheral edema, skin eruptions, and pericardial effusion. Only one patient discontinued treatment, due to intestinal intolerance. Four patients died during follow-up: two because of lung neoplasms and two because of progressive graft vessel disease. CONCLUSION: Sirolimus improved late CNI-related chronic renal dysfunction. Kidney function was preserved using a de novo CNI-free immunosuppressive regimen for recent cardiac transplant recipients.     

Dengue in renal transplant patients: a retrospective analysis

We reviewed the impact of dengue in 27 renal transplant recipients (9 females and 18 males) at a mean of 63 (6-287) months after transplantation. Their mean age was 37+/-14 years and all were first transplantations (21 live donors, 6 deceased donors). Twenty-six were dengue fever cases and one had dengue hemorrhagic fever. Symptoms were: fever (100%), muscular pain (90%), malaise (75%), and headache (68%). Eight (29%) patients were admitted to hospital with one death. All other cases had full recovery. Mean serum creatinine before dengue was 1.4+/-0.6 mg/dL, increased to a mean peak of 1.9+/-1.2 mg/dL (P<0.001), and returned to baseline after recovery (1.6+/-0.82 mg/dL, P=NS). After a mean follow-up of 39+/-18 months, four patients lost their grafts due to chronic allograft nephropathy and four died, due to infectious causes not related to dengue. The first episode of dengue in transplanted patients resembled a flu-like syndrome, as in the general population. It did not cause long-term damage to either the patient or the graft.     

Rapid Resolution of Proteinuria of Native Kidney Origin Following Live Donor Renal Transplantation

To assess the contribution of the protein content of urine from the native kidneys to post-transplant proteinuria, we prospectively studied 14 live donor transplant recipients with a pre-transplant random urine protein to creatinine ratio (UPr:Cr) >0.5. Seven patients received preemptive transplants, and seven patients were on dialysis pre-transplant (with residual urine output). Resolution of proteinuria was defined as UPr:Cr < 0.2. Immunosuppression consisted of tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and corticosteroids. Anti-hypertensive drugs that might reduce proteinuria were avoided during the study. The serum creatinine was 8.7 +/- 0.7 mg/dL pre-transplant, and the nadir post-transplant serum creatinine was 1.4 +/- 0.1 mg/dL. The pre-transplant UPr:Cr ranged between 0.5 and 9.2 (mean = 2.9 +/- 0.6). The UPr:Cr decreased to <0.2 in all 14 patients at a mean of 4.5 weeks post-transplant (range 1-10 weeks). In conclusion, in live donor renal transplant recipients with immediate graft function, proteinuria of native kidney origin resolves in the early post-transplant period. After the immediate post-transplant period, proteinuria cannot be attributed to the native kidneys, and work up for proteinuria should focus on the allograft.     

Impact of adequate dialysis before transplantation on development of chronic renal allograft dysfunction in 3-year posttransplant period

INTRODUCTION: Transplantation is the preferred treatment modality for many patients with end-stage renal diseases. Despite all the efforts, allograft dysfunction remains the most important cause of graft loss. Finding new factors that improve graft survival is mandatory. METHODS: This prospective study included 93 patients transplanted between April 1999 and July 2000. The duration of dialysis prior to transplantation was analyzed with respect to the values before and up to 3 years posttransplantation, including blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine, and blood pressure (BP) using 1-month intervals and triglyceride, cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein and high-density lipoprotein at 3-month intervals. In this study, graft dysfunction was defined as serum creatinine >1.8 mg/dL. Hypertension was defined as BP > 140/90 on two occasions or treatment with antihypertensive medications. Patients in the hypertensive group were divided into controlled versus uncontrolled hypertensives. RESULTS: The mean BUN and creatinine values of the patients prior to transplantation was 90 +/- 30 and 10.4 +/- 4, respectively. The patients had been on dialysis for an average of 4.7 years. Development of renal allograft dysfunction did not show any relationship to the duration of dialysis ptt. Patients with higher BUN and creatinine levels before transplantation experienced more episodes of renal allograft dysfunction in the 3-year posttransplant period (P < .05 for both BUN and creatinine). The relationship between BUN and creatinine prior to transplantation and risk of renal allograft dysfunction was more powerful among the group of uncontrolled hypertensives. CONCLUSION: Intensive dialysis prior to transplantation may exert positive effects on long-term graft function and survival.     

Preemptive living donor kidney transplantation: do the benefits extend to all recipients?

BACKGROUND: Preemptive kidney transplantation (prior to the institution of dialysis) avoids the morbidity and mortality of dialysis; however, detailed studies of high-risk patients are lacking. The aim of the current study was to compare recent outcomes of preemptive (P) versus nonpreemptive (NP) living donor kidney transplantation with an emphasis on high-risk recipients. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 438 sequential solitary living donor kidney transplants at our institution between January 2000 and December 2002. In all, 44% were preemptive. NP recipients were dialyzed for 21+/-36 months (range 1-312 months). RESULTS: Overall, three-year patient survival was similar in the NP and P groups. When stratified by diabetes and age >65 years, P and NP recipients again showed similar survival. Death-censored three-year graft survival was better in the P group (97% vs. 90%, P=0.01), but was not significant by multivariate analysis. Delayed graft function was more frequent in NP vs. P (10% vs. 4%; P=0.01), but other early complications were similar including: acute rejection, 16% vs. 11% (P=0.11); primary nonfunction, 3% vs. 2% (P=0.38); and wound complications, 19% vs. 17% (P=0.54). Glomerular filtration rate at three years was similar in the two groups (53+/-23 preemptive vs. 52+/-20 ml/min nonpreemptive; P=0.37). CONCLUSION: With prompt referral and workup, preemptive kidney transplantation can be performed successfully in a large percentage of renal allograft recipients. Preemptive transplantation avoids unnecessary dialysis and should be emphasized as initial therapy for many patients with end-stage renal disease.     

Anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody sequential immunosuppressive induction therapy in renal transplants with high risk of delayed graft function

There is little experience on the use of monoclonal antibodies that block the high-affinity interleukin-2 receptor (basiliximab and daclizumab) in sequential therapy in renal transplants with risk of delayed graft function. This study sougth to test the efficacy and safety of the substitution of anticalcineurins with two doses of basiliximab or daclizumab in the immediate posttransplant period for recipients at risk of delayed renal graft function. Immunosuppression consisted of steroids, mycophenolate mofetil, and two doses of basiliximab (20 mg/day) on days 0 and 4 posttransplant or daclizumab (1 mg/kg per day) on days 0 and 15 posttransplant. Anticalcineurins were not administered until the beginning of graft function. Among 49 recipients (mean age 63.5 +/- 10.5 years), 40 received a kidney from a donor over 60 years of age, three from a non-heart-beating donor, and six from donors with an acute elevation of serum creatinine to 2.4 +/- 0.86 (1.7-3.7). At a mean follow-up of 14.2 +/- 8.4 months, five patients experienced acute rejection episodes. Only 15 patients needed posttransplant dialysis (2.7 +/- 1.6). In 11 patients, cyclosporine (CsA) was introduced at 6 +/- 2.9 days posttransplant and in 37, tacrolimus on 8.6 +/- 3.6 days posttransplant. The incidence of kidney graft loss was 16.3%. Patient survival was 96%. Thirty-nine recipients are alive with functioning grafts, with mean serum creatinine of 1.4 mg/dL. In conclusion, substitution for anticalcineurins with interleukin-2-receptor blockade in the immediate posttransplant period for patients at risk of delayed graft function minimizes nephrotoxicity and reduces tubular necrosis, without increasing the risk of an acute rejection episode.     

Kidney-Alone Transplantation in Diabetic Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease

From January 1989 to December 1995, 5 diabetic patients with end-stage renal disease (1 woman, 4 men) underwent kidney-alone transplantation. The mean age of the recipients at the time of transplantation was 37.4 years (range, 32 to 43). Graft function and glucose tolerance was evaluated for 5 to 72 months after surgery. Postoperative complications were seen in 2 patients; nonspecific subcutaneous infections and an asymptomatic partial allograft infarction. All renal allografts were functioning 1 year after transplantation, with a mean serum creatinine level of 1.10mg/dL (range, 0.8 to 1.8mg/dL), and a mean urinary protein level of 1 7.8mg/dL (range, 5 to 27mg/dL). The postoperative daily dose of insulin was higher than the preoperative dose, while the level of glycated hemoglobin (HbA_1c) increased after surgery and peaked 6 months after transplantation; 1 year after transplantation it had reverted to the preoperative level. As long as the diabetic complications of the renal allograft recipients are not severe, the short-term survival and the renal function of diabetic patients with end-stage renal disease improves after kidney-alone transplantation, which is still the standard method of treatment in Japan.     

One hundred percent patient and kidney allograft survival with simultaneous liver and kidney transplantation in infants with primary hyperoxaluria: a single-center experience

BACKGROUND: Combined liver-kidney transplantation is the definitive treatment for end-stage renal disease caused by primary hyperoxaluria type I (PH1). The infantile form is characterized by renal failure early in life, advanced systemic oxalosis, and a formidable mortality rate. Although others have reported on overall results of transplantation for PH1 covering a wide age spectrum, none has specifically addressed the high-risk infantile form of the disease. METHODS: Six infants with PH1 underwent simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation at our center between May 1994 and August 1998. Diagnosis was made at 5.2+/-3.3 months of age, they were on dialysis for 11.8+/-2.3 months, and they underwent transplantation at 14.8+/-3.0 months of age when they weighed 10.6+/-1.7 kg. RESULTS: At a mean follow-up of 6.4+/-1.7 years (range, 3.9-8.1 years), we report 100% patient and kidney allograft survival. There were no cases of acute tubular necrosis. Long-term kidney allograft function remained stable in all patients, with serum creatinine values of less than 1.1 mg/dL and a mean creatinine clearance of 99 mL/min/1.73 m2 at follow-up. Those who received combined hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis pretransplant had lower posttransplant urinary oxalate values than those receiving peritoneal dialysis alone. There was improvement in growth and psychomotor and mental developmental scores after transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: Combined liver-kidney transplantation for the infantile presentation of PH1 is associated with excellent outcome when the approach includes early diagnosis and early combined transplantation, aggressive pretransplant dialysis, and avoidance of posttransplant renal dysfunction.     

Outcomes After Transplantation of Deceased-Donor Kidneys with Rising Serum Creatinine

The increasing number of candidates for kidney transplantation and relatively unchanged deceased-donor pool has led to expansion in the criteria for donor acceptability. Outcomes of kidneys from donors with progressively rising creatinine values have not been reported. Patients transplanted between September 2003 and August 2006 with kidneys from donors with peak creatinine levels >2.0 mg/dL were stratified into two groups based on the terminal creatinine and evaluated for outcome: (1) falling creatinine (FC)(n= 27), terminal creatinine at least 0.2mg/dL less than peak, and (2) rising creatinine (RC)(n=24), terminal creatinine = peak. The mean terminal creatinine was significantly higher in the RC group (3.2 +/- 1.3 mg/dL) compared to the FC group (1.9 +/- 0.9 mg/dL)(p<0.0001). Peak creatinine values were similar (RC, 3.2 +/- 1.3; FC, 3.1 +/- 1.3; p=0.6521) between the two groups. Rates of delayed graft function (RC, 24%; FC 32%; p=0.7881) and mean creatinine at follow-up (RC, 1.6 +/- 0.6, FC 1.6 +/- 0.4; p=0.3533) were not significantly different. With a mean follow-up of 287 +/- 274 days, allograft survival was 92% in the RC recipients and 89% in the FC recipients. Under certain conditions, kidneys from donors with rising serum creatinine can be used safely with reasonable early outcomes.     

Factors associated with hyperhomocysteinemia after renal transplantation

Recent studies show that clinically stable renal transplant recipients have an increased prevalence of hyperhomocysteinemia (hyperHcy), but the mechanism of this disorder has not yet been elucidated. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the factors associated with hyperHcy after a successful renal transplantation. In 106 stable renal transplant recipients, total serum Hcy level (tHcy), folate, total protein, serum creatinine concentration, creatinine clearance, lipid status, body weight (BW), body mass index (BMI), and body fat (BF) were determined. The mean doses of cyclosporine, prednisolone, and azathioprine (mg/kg/day) were recorded. The mean serum tHcy level was significantly higher in renal transplant patients than in healthy controls (22.02 +/- 8.02 versus 13.0 +/- 3.3 micromol/ L; p < 0.001), and the incidence of patients with hyperHcy was 82%. Comparison of the group of 20 patients with tHcy level <15 micromol/L and the group of 86 patients with tHcy level >15 micromol/L revealed that the latter was significantly older, heavier, had been longer on dialysis before renal transplantation, and had older donors and poorer renal graft function. Significant correlation was found between tHcy level and recipient age, dialysis duration, BW, creatinine clearance, serum creatinine, and folate concentration. However, multivariate analysis indicated that creatinine clearance (p = 0.025) and BW (p = 0.03) were the only determinants of elevated total Hcy level in renal transplant recipients. HyperHcy persists after successful kidney transplantation in the majority of renal transplant recipients, and its appearance is primarily associated with creatinine clearance and body weight.     

Conversion to sirolimus from cyclosporine may induce nephrotic proteinuria and progressive deterioration of renal function in chronic allograft nephropathy patients

Antiproliferative and non-nephrotoxic properties of sirolimus have been exploited for treatment of patients with chronic graft dysfunction. In this paper we point to the possible association of nephrotic syndrome and renal impairment with rapid conversion from cyclosporine (CsA) to sirolimus in patients with chronic nephropathy. Five male patients, ages 34 to 56 years, with chronic renal failure in the course of glomerulonephritis, were transplanted between 1997 and 1999. For the first 49 to 65 months, the immunosuppressive regimen consisted of CsA, azathioprine (AZA), and prednisone. Thereafter, due to chronic nephropathy evidenced by biopsy, conversion to sirolimus was performed with sharp withdrawal of CsA. The serum creatinine level prior to conversion was 1.9 +/- 0.3 mg/dL. Trace to 86 mg/dL proteinuria was found in 3 patients, while 2 patients had about 200 mg/dL. After 2 to 4 months of sirolimus treatment the proteinuria progressed (558 +/- 183 mg/dL); edema, hypoproteinemia, hypoalbuminemia, and hyperlipidemia developed; and the serum creatinine increased to 3.5 +/- 0.8 mg/dL. Biopsies performed in three patients revealed new pathologic changes. After 4 to 5 months, we performed reconversion to calcineurin inhibitor. Proteinuria decreased to 0 to 150 mg/dL; nevertheless the serum creatinine was continuously rising. Six to 15 months after the conversion, 3 patients returned to dialysis. The fourth patient, who was earlier reconverted, has a serum creatinine level of 2.0 mg/dL after 15 months. In conclusion, conversion from CsA to sirolimus may induce nephrotic syndrome with progressive deterioration of renal function. Converted patients require careful monitoring of proteinuria and renal function. Early reconversion to calcineurin inhibitor may prevent progressive deterioration of graft function.     

Results of en bloc renal transplants of pediatric deceased donors into adult recipients

Various strategies have evolved to expand the donor pool due to the extreme shortage of organs. Herein we reviewed our experience with en bloc pediatric kidney transplantation since 1998. METHODS: From January 1998 to December 2004, nine adult patients underwent kidney transplantation using en bloc kidneys from donors <5 years old (range, 1 to 4). The mean age of the recipients was 45.1 years (range, 34 to 57). RESULTS: In recipients of en bloc pediatric transplantation, cold ischemia time ranged from 14 to 26.2 hours (mean, 21.3 hours). Mean serum creatinine at 3, 6, and 12 months after transplantation was 1.53 +/- 0.57, 1.27 +/- 0.27, and 1.15 +/- 0.26 mg/dL compared with 1.93 +/- 1.35, 1.81 +/- 1.17, and 1.73 +/- 0.85 (P = .08) in recipients of single kidneys from ideal cadaveric donors (UNOS criteria, n = 368). Patient and graft survival at 1 year were 88.8% compared with 91.2% and 85% with ideal donors (P = NS), respectively. Three cases required additional surgery. There was one death due to a cerebral vascular accident. CONCLUSION: The present study confirmed the excellent results achieved with transplantation using en bloc kidneys from young donors.     

Eurotransplant Senior Program 'old for old': results from 10 patients

More frequently there is the need for renal transplantation of older patients. Against the background of an increasing number of old donors and recipients, Eurotransplant Leiden started the Eurotransplant Senior Program (ESP) 'old for old' in 1999. The ESP works with donors and recipients both over 65 yr. The kidneys are transplanted with short cold ischaemia time regardless of the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) compatibility. Compatibility of blood groups, negative crossmatch and less than 5% cytotoxic antibodies are required. First experiences from 10 patients at Heinrich Heine University hospital are reported here. The course of 10 transplanted patients is described from January 1999 until November 1999 (28.4+/-15.8 wk). Age of donor and recipient, cause of dialysis and concomitant diseases from recipients, function of the transplanted kidney and complications are analysed. Immunosuppression consisted initially of cyclosporin A, mycophenolic acid and steroids. The results of these 10 patients were compared to 14 patients who were transplanted according to the ordinary Eurotransplant criteria (Eurotransplant Kidney Allocation System) in the same period of time. Kidneys from six donors (70.5+/-3.3 yr) were transplanted to 10 different recipients (66.9+/-2.2 yr). The control group consisted of 14 patients (47.6+/-14.4 yr) who received kidneys from 14 donors (48.3+/-10.1 yr). One double kidney transplantation was performed in the senior group, i.e. two kidneys from a marginal donor were transplanted to one recipient ('two in one'). In the ESP group, cold ischaemia time was reduced by 5 h and mean of HLA mismatches was more than doubled. Mean length of hospitalisation of ESP and control groups was 47.2+/-28.2 and 34.2+/-11.6 d, respectively. Intraoperatively, no complications were seen, post-operative care was performed on a normal ward. ESP patients suffered more often from delayed graft function, which led to further need for haemodialysis for 11.2 d. Finally, 9 of 10 patients acquired a satisfactory renal graft function. A total of 13 biopsies were performed in eight cases. Altogether seven acute rejections in 6 patients were found (four interstitial, one vascular, one interstitial+vascular, one clinical). The 9 patients with sufficient renal graft function were discharged with a mean serum creatinine level of 2.3+/-0.5 mg/dL (control: 1.9+/-0.8 mg/dL). Comparing these 10 recipients to a control group consisting of 14 patients, the results are comparable and encouraging. In conclusion, the short-term results of the ESP are promising. Nevertheless, the post-operative care requires more attention due to several complications. Though the HLA compatibility was not considered, all rejections were coped with effectively. Quality of life was improved.