Inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysms.

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysms (IAAA) are a variant of aortic aneurysm characterised by extensive peri-aneurysmal fibrosis, thickened walls and dense adhesions and represent between 3 and 10% of all abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). Surgery is technically challenging and is still associated with an increased morbidity and mortality. Controversy exists about aetiology and pathogenesis. METHODS: We review the literature on the current theories, the available imaging modalities and the current thinking on management of IAAA. A Medline database search was performed. Articles were cross-referenced. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Aneurysm development is multifactorial with important genetic and environmental factors. The literature supports the theory that IAAA arise from the same antigenic stimulus that is responsible for the non-IAAA, representing one extreme of an inflammatory spectrum. The results after open repair have improved and there is now little difference in the mortality between non-IAAA and IAAA repair. However, there is likely to be a role for endovascular stenting in IAAA management and this requires further study. It is clear that closer follow-up of patients after IAAA repair with either technique is necessary to monitor the inflammatory process. No evidence-based follow-up protocol exists but three to six-monthly monitoring of renal function and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) for 24 months post-repair would seem a reasonable regime.     

Elective surgery for small abdominal aortic aneurysms.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Surgical repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm has become more frequent and the mortality associated with elective surgery has been reduced, but the overall mortality for ruptured aneurysm remains unacceptably high. The dilemma for the vascular surgeon is whether to operate early and electively on asymptomatic small aneurysms, less than 5 cm in diameter, or to delay surgery, adopting a wait-and-see attitude. The purpose of this retrospective study was to review a recent 5-year experience of elective aneurysm surgery, with special emphasis on the perioperative outcome of surgical repair of asymptomatic small aneurysms, in order to evaluate whether early mortality and morbidity justify an aggressive approach. METHODS: The report concerns a series of 141 consecutive patients who underwent aneurysm repair for small (n = 65, group I) and large aneurysms (n = 76, group II). For each group, the age, sex, risk factors and associated diseases, operative and aortic cross-clamping times, estimated blood loss, blood transfusion volume, type of operation and graft, perioperative morbidity and mortality, and causes of death were recorded and compared. RESULTS: The majority of patients were males. The mean age of the patients was lower in group I than in group II. No statistically significant difference was found from the comparison of the risk factors and associated diseases in groups I and II. The mean operating time was 82 minutes in group I, 98 minutes in group II, and the aortic cross-clamping time was also shorter in group I (37 min versus 52 min), whereas blood loss was greater, with a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05). The operative mortality rate was higher in group II than in group I (1.3% versus 0%, P = NS). CONCLUSIONS: Elective small aneurysm repair is recommended in good-risk patients for the following reasons: (i) the operative mortality and morbidity rates are lower in small than in large aneurysm patients, and (ii) the small aneurysm repair is technically easier and safer to perform. In addition, there are two other considerations that are more difficult to quantify, but may support an aggressive approach: the cost-benefit ratio is better with early diagnosis and elective surgery, before an emergency operation is required, and personal choice and psychological reasons can induce patients to prefer early elective repair to periodic monitoring by ultrasound or computed tomography scans.     

False abdominal aortic and iliac aneurysms.

A case of late postoperative false abdominal aortic an iliac aneurysms complicated by malposition of the inferior vana cava is presented and attention is drawn to its presentation, diagnosis and management. Several factors assumed to be responsible for the formation of the false aneurysms 7 years after the previous grafting operation are discussed.     

Surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysms associated with malignancy

(Received for publication on June 20, 1997; accepted on Jan. 6, 1998)     

Outcome after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Difference between men and women.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate short- and long-term outcome after open repair for ruptured and non-ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) with special emphasis on the difference between men and women. DESIGN: Single center retrospective study. Time and cause of death were determined from hospital charts, the National Bureau of Statistics and the Department for National Health and Welfare. Materials. Eight hundred and forty-six patients were followed-up, 597 were operated on for non-ruptured and 249 for ruptured aneurysms. METHODS: Case fatality was analyzed by multiple logistic regression considering year of surgery, age at surgery, and gender as covariates. The mortality rate for patients surviving 60 days after surgery was compared with the mortality in the general population by calculating the standardised mortality ratio (SMR). Mortality was also stratified according to gender and type of surgery. RESULTS: The SMR for patients surviving 60 days after surgery was significantly increased. SMR was significantly higher for women than for men. There was no statistically significant difference in SMR between patients operated for rupture compared to those operated for non-ruptured aneurysms. CONCLUSIONS: Women with AAA have a poorer outcome than women in the general population. This finding may relate to the large number of risk factors present in this patient sub-group.     

Prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysms in over 65-year-old men with inguinal hernias

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) in over 65-year-old men who have inguinal hernias and discuss if pre-operative selective screening of this population is appropriate.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A prospective study on 70 consecutive male patients with an age range of 65–88 years (mean, 74 years) who were referred to a single vascular consultant''s out-patient clinic with an inguinal hernia were screened for the presence of an AAA with an ultrasound scan before hernia repair over a period of 3 years.

RESULTS

Two patients were found to have an AAA measuring 3.8 cm and 6.0 cm giving an AAA prevalence of 3% (exact 95% confidence interval = 0–10%).

CONCLUSIONS

This study does not demonstrate an increased AAA prevalence in over 65-year-old male patients with inguinal hernias, scanned pre-operatively when compared to screening programmes. Selective screening of this cohort cannot be justified on this evidence.     

Homocysteine and abdominal aortic aneurysms

There is evidence to suggest that increased levels of homocysteine play a significant role in vascular disease. It has been suggested that lowering homocysteine levels by dietary folate supplementation may reduce the risk of stroke and coronary heart disease. It is plausible that homocysteine may also play a role in the pathogenesis of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) and that patients with this disease may benefit from folate supplementation. Our objective was to review the published work with regard to the role of homocysteine in the pathogenesis of AAA. Searches were carried out in published work in English with the keywords 'abdominal aortic aneurysm' and 'homocysteine'. There is evidence from in vitro and animal model studies that activation of metalloproteinases by homocysteine can influence aortic wall structure. Several case-control studies report an association between increased levels of homocysteine and the presence of an AAA. There are conflicting genotypic data concerning the association between methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene variants and AAA. Although there is evidence for an association between homocysteine and AAA, it is not strong enough to conclude that it plays a causal role in the pathogenesis of AAA. Further research is needed, given the potential benefit that simple vitamin supplementation may have for patients with AAA.     

Inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysms

In a series of 517 operations for abdominal aortic aneurysm from 1971 to 1988 there were 45 cases (8.7%) with an inflammatory aneurysm with a typical thick glistening whitish fibrous layer. Almost two-third of the patients had rather severe chronic or acute progressive pain in the abdomen, the back or the flank. Unilateral (7) or bilateral (2) hydronephrosis due to ureteral compression occurred in 9 patients (20%). A diagnosis of inflammatory aneurysm was made preoperatively only in 10 patients. In 8 of the 9 patients with hydronephrosis ureterolysis was done, unilaterally (6) or bilaterally (2). After ureterolysis all had complete resolution of the hydronephrosis. Preoperative diagnostic methods are excretory urography, showing medial deviation, ultrasonography and CT-scanning of the abdominal aorta. All patients with an inflammatory aneurysm should undergo aortic replacement to prevent rupture and achieve pain relief. Ureterolysis in cases of hydronephrosis is strongly recommended and may be performed safely and with excellent results.     

Familial abdominal aortic aneurysms

The case histories of three brothers, the only siblings of one family, all of whom underwent surgery for the treatment of a previously asymptomatic ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm, are recorded. The possibility of underlying constitutional and hereditary factors is discussed and the suggestion of a primary familial incidence of atheromatous, nondissecting aortic aneurysm is raised.     

Laparoscopic surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysms

Background: Laparoscopic surgery for infrarenal aortic aneurysms is based on the principle of retroperitoneal exclusion of the aneurysm sac with aortofemoral or aortoiliac bypass. Methods: Of 22 patients who met the selection criteria, 20 successfully underwent laparoscopic aortic surgery at Morristown Memorial Hospital between February and October 1997. Technical elements and steps of this operation are described and illustrated. Results: Within 30 days of surgery, 2 patients died and 9 had various major and minor perioperative complications. As a group, the laparoscopic patients had less postoperative pain, needed fewer hours of ventilator support, had shorter intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital lengths of stay, and resumed diet and normal activity earlier than the historical norms for patients undergoing transabdominal or retroperitoneal aortic resections at the same institution. Conclusions: These early observations suggest that the laparoscopic treatment of infrarenal abdominal aneurysms may have several significant potential benefits. Long-term results and randomized prospective studies with patients matched by risk stratification will be needed to confirm these impressions. Received: 23 June 1997/Accepted: 11 December 1997