Intra-abdominal injury following blunt trauma. Identifying the high-risk patient using objective risk factors

The initial physical examination is frequently unreliable in identifying patients with blunt trauma at high risk for having serious intra-abdominal injury. Intra-abdominal injury may be associated with specific injuries or risk factors, but the usefulness of such objective clinical criteria in predicting intra-abdominal injury has not previously been determined. The presence or absence of each of 11 clinical indicators and their association with serious intra-abdominal injury were analyzed in 3223 patients with blunt trauma. Linear and logistic regressions were used to determine which factors were significant predictors of an increased probability of intra-abdominal injury. Arterial base deficit less than -3 mEq/L, major chest injury, hypotension, and pelvic fractures were found to significantly increase the chance of intra-abdominal injury. Early diagnostic evaluation of the abdomen using diagnostic peritoneal lavage or computed tomography should be strongly considered in patients with blunt trauma who present with these associated factors.     

Selective monitoring of patients with suspected blunt cardiac injury

Blunt chest trauma can result in cardiac injury with consequent dysrhythmias, valve malfunction, or frank rupture. Typically, patients with blunt chest trauma and suspected cardiac injury have required cardiac monitoring for 48 to 72 hours. Predicting which patients with blunt chest trauma are not at risk for cardiac complications would obviate many patient-hours of monitoring in the intensive care unit. This series examines the sensitivity of two-dimensional surface echocardiography in predicting cardiac complications. Over a 24-month period, 115 patients were admitted with blunt chest trauma and prospectively evaluated for cardiac injury with admission electrocardiograms, serial creatine kinase isoenzyme studies, and two-dimensional echocardiography. Thirty-one patients (27%) had abnormal two-dimensional echocardiograms. In 8 (25.8%) of these patients, cardiac complications requiring treatment developed. Eighty-four patients (73%) had normal two-dimensional echocardiograms, and a cardiac complication requiring treatment developed in only 1 (1.2%) of them. Of the 9 patients who required treatment of cardiac complications, 3 had normal admission electrocardiograms and only 1 had elevated levels of the myocardial-specific isoenzymes of creatine kinase. We believe two-dimensional echocardiography is a sensitive test for evaluating cardiac injury resulting from blunt chest trauma and is helpful in selecting those patients who require monitoring in the intensive care unit.     

Pneumoperitoneum in polytraumatized patients without perforated hollow viscera

Bowel and mesenteric injuries from blunt abdominal trauma are infrequent and difficult to diagnose. A finding of pneumoperitoneum on computed tomography is useful, although not specific. In associated blunt chest trauma gas can reach the peritoneal cavity through congenital or post-traumatic diaphragmatic interruptions. Two cases of pneumoperitoneum following associated blunt chest and abdominal trauma are reported. In both patients laparotomy did not show bowel perforation and conservative treatment could have been provided.     

False-negative plain cervical spine x-rays in blunt trauma

Although considered very accurate, false-negative plain cervical radiographs of blunt trauma patients will occur with potentially devastating complications. We sought to define the population of patients who fall into this category and the overall accuracy of adequate three-view cervical spine radiography in the blunt trauma population. A retrospective search was carried out of blunt trauma patients entered into our trauma registry. All patients with the ICD-9 codes indicating cervical spine injury with a negative three-view cervical spine radiograph reading had their charts and radiographs reviewed. Institutional statistics for blunt cervical trauma evaluation and injury were obtained from the trauma registry. Fifty-eight of 936 blunt trauma patients (6.2%) were diagnosed with cervical spine injury over the 9-month study period. Of 649 patients with adequate three-view plain radiographs, three patients were identified with negative plain radiographs and significant cervical spine injury, a false-negative rate of 0.5 per cent. Sensitivity was 90.3 per cent, specificity was 96.3 per cent, positive predictive value was 54.9 per cent, and negative predictive value was 99.5 per cent. Three-view plain radiograph series of the cervical spine remains a highly sensitive and specific test for cervical spine injury following blunt trauma. However, the fact that we identified three patients with significant fractures after negative plain radiographs suggests that serious consideration of computed tomography must be applied in treating symptomatic, high-risk blunt trauma patients when plain radiographs do not reveal an injury.     

Erstversorgung bei Thoraxtrauma

Thoracic trauma, most often associated with other serious injuries, is the main cause of death in the first 45 years of life. The percentage of chest injuries in multiple trauma, mainly from blunt impact, has remained relatively constant at 80% during the last 30 years. Isolated thoracic injuries comprise only 25% of all trauma cases, 90% of chest injuries are due to blunt impact, while penetrating injuries make up 5-10%. Since 25% of deaths from trauma are attributable to chest injuries, they determine the survival rate in multiple trauma to a significant extent. The pattern of chest injuries is variable, frequently in different combinations comprising rib cage and diaphragm, lung parenchyma, airway and mediastinal organs. This article details the immediate simultaneous diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in the prehospital phase, management in the emergency room, the relative importance of computed tomography, ultrasound examination and endoscopy in the primary diagnostic evaluation and the principles of anaesthetic management of thoracic trauma.     

The diagnostic dilemma of traumatic rupture of the diaphragm

BACKGROUND: Traumatic rupture of diaphragm is caused by blunt or penetrating trauma. Early diagnosis is difficult, and complications such as visceral herniation may arise. A 10-year evaluation of all diagnostic procedures used in patients with surgically proved traumatic rupture of the diaphragm is presented. METHODS: A review of all patients with surgically proved diaphragmatic injury from 1988 to 1998 was conducted. All diagnostic methods were analyzed in terms of their ability to identify diaphragmatic rupture. RESULTS: During the study period, 31 patients with a mean age of 34 years were treated. Of these patients, 20 sustained blunt trauma and 11 experienced penetrating trauma. The initial chest x-ray was diagnostic for 6 of the 31 patients, nonspecific for 15 of the patients, and normal for 10 of the patients. In no case was sonography diagnostic. Thoracoabdominal computed tomography (CT), performed in 22 of the patients, led to diagnosis for 5 patients and unspecific findings for 17 patients. Statistical analyses showed no significant difference between initial chest x-ray and thoracoabdominal CT. No significant difference between blunt or penetrating trauma or between left-side and right-side ruptures could be recognized with any diagnostic tool. CONCLUSIONS: All the diagnostic methods investigated in this study showed unsatisfying results, and traumatic rupture of the diaphragm seems to remain a diagnostic dilemma. Endoscopic techniques not tested in this study and discussed controversially may offer a good chance for early diagnosis and repair of the injured diaphragm.     

Supplemental emergent chest computed tomography in the management of blunt torso trauma

The efficacy of conventional chest X-ray (CXR) in comparison to chest computed tomography (CCT) in acutely injured blunt trauma patients was examined. Over a 21-month period, 50 patients underwent CXR and CCT according to a standard protocol, and their films and records were reviewed retrospectively. Hemo- and/or pneumothorax (HPTX) was noted in 12 patients (five by CXR, 12 by CCT). Pulmonary contusion (PC) was identified in ten patients (four by CXR, ten by CCT). Three additional false positive PC were diagnosed by CXR. Therapy changes based upon CCT findings occurred in seven of seven HPTX and five of six PC. The two imaging techniques were complementary in detecting fractures. Atelectasis was a common CCT finding (58% incidence). Chest X-ray is less sensitive than chest computed tomography in the detection of HPTX (42% vs. 100%) and PC (40% vs. 100%). Emergent chest computed tomography is recommended in stable patients with: 1) blunt high-energy torso trauma, 2) "cross-body" injury pattern, and/or 3) a mechanism of injury suggestive of chest trauma.     

家兔闭合性胸部创伤早期影像学检查的诊断价值

目的探讨放射性核素显象、胸部CT和X线检查对家兔闭合性胸部创伤的早期诊断价值. 方法建立单侧胸部撞击伤动物模型,采用单光子发射计算机断层显象(SPECT)、胸部CT和X线片对闭合性胸部创伤进行早期诊断,并与病理解剖结果进行对照观察. 结果伤后30分钟伤侧肺感兴趣区致伤部位/心脏部位(ROI2/ROI1)比值立即升高,至伤后6小时达到高峰;对侧肺相对应部位/心脏部位(ROI3/ROI1)比值缓慢升高,至伤后6小时达到高峰,但仍小于伤侧肺,双侧肺之间比较差别具有显著性意义(P＜0.01). 结论胸部X线片检查仍是诊断胸部创伤最基本的方法,但对严重的胸部创伤和多发伤患者应尽早做胸部CT检查,SPECT对肺挫伤有较高的诊断价值.CT对肺挫伤的诊断敏感性优于X线片,但对渗出和水肿则不如SPECT灵敏、准确. 因此,对严重胸部创伤、多发伤患者,急诊检查应采用CT,以尽快明确诊断.     

Usefulness of Multidetector Computed Tomography for the Initial Assessment of Blunt Abdominal Trauma Patients

Background The prompt detection and accurate localization of abdominal injuries are difficult. Some diagnostic modalities, including laboratory tests, ultrasound, and diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL) were used to evaluate patients with blunt abdominal trauma, with various advantages and pitfalls. We aimed to evaluate the risk and benefit of using multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) as an initial assessment tool for proper diagnosis and treatment planning of patients with blunt abdominal trauma. Methods Two hundred fifty-two patients with blunt abdominal trauma were prospectively enrolled. Multidetector computed tomography was performed during resuscitation. The risk and benefit of using MDCT in the diagnosis and planning of treatment were analyzed. Results The time required for a MDCT examination averaged 10.2 minutes. Of the studies done, 224 revealed abdominal injuries. Of those, 34 were performed in patients with unstable hemodynamic status without adverse effect. Prompt diagnosis and proper treatment were given according to the MDCT findings. A total of 43 (17.1%) MDCTs showed contrast extravasation. Active bleeding was confirmed in all and treated with transarterial embolization (30) or surgery (13). Another 58 patients sustained bowel, mesenteric, or pancreatic injuries (BMPI) necessitating laparotomy. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of MDCT in identifying patients with active bleeding or BMPI were all 100%. Conclusions Multidetector computed tomography was useful as a second line initial assessment tool to identify injuries and determine treatment planning in blunt abdominal trauma patients. No increased risk was found if the facility is readily available, the protocol is well designed, and the patient is well prepared.     

Defining the role of computed tomography in blunt abdominal trauma: use in the hemodynamically stable patient with a depressed level of consciousness

HYPOTHESIS: Controversy exists regarding the use of diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL) vs computed tomography (CT) in the evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma. It has been suggested that one role for DPL is to diagnose bowel injuries in hemodynamically stable patients with an unreliable abdominal examination result. Our hypothesis is that CT is specific and sensitive for diagnosing hollow viscus injuries and is therefore an appropriate diagnostic modality in the hemodynamically stable blunt trauma patient with an unreliable abdominal examination result due to a depressed level of consciousness. DESIGN: Retrospective consecutive case review. SETTING: An urban level II trauma center. PATIENTS: The medical records of 1388 consecutive patients admitted between January 1, 1991, and December 31, 2000, were reviewed. Inclusion criteria included blunt trauma patients who were hemodynamically stable (defined as a systolic blood pressure >90 mm Hg) with unreliable abdominal examination results secondary to a depressed level of consciousness (Glasgow Coma Scale score <11). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Hollow viscus injury diagnosed by CT and missed diagnosis of hollow viscus injury by CT. RESULTS: Of 1388 patients who met entry criteria, 87 had hollow viscus injuries; CT identified 85 of these injuries. Computed tomography diagnosed intestinal injury with a sensitivity of 97.7%, specificity of 98.5%, and an overall accuracy of 99.4%. CONCLUSION: At our institution, CT is a reliable and accurate diagnostic modality when used to evaluate hollow viscus injuries in the hemodynamically stable blunt trauma patient with an unreliable abdominal examination result due to a depressed level of consciousness.     

Incidence and management of occult hemothoraces

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the incidence of and associated management outcomes of occult hemothorax in blunt trauma patients. The increased use of computed thoracic tomography for the evaluation of the multiply injured blunt trauma patient has led to an increase in the identification of these hemothoraces and management dilemmas. METHODS: A retrospective review of blunt trauma patients with occult hemothoraces was performed. Patients were divided into 2 groups: chest tube versus no chest tube. Outcomes and complications for the 2 groups were defined. Data included demographics, Injury Severity Score, length of stay, need for mechanical ventilation and thoracic consult, pneumonia, and empyema. The size of the occult hemothorax was measured on the computed thoracic tomography. RESULTS: Eighty-eight patients (21.4%) had a total of 107 occult hemothoraces. Patients in the chest tube group were more likely to have a higher Injury Severity Score and an associated occult pneumothorax and to have smaller hemothoraces. CONCLUSIONS: Occult pneumothoraces occur in a significant proportion of the multiply injured blunt trauma population. Small, isolated, occult hemothoraces can be managed safely in the stable patient.     

Diagnosis of myocardial contusion. Quantitative analysis of single photon emission computed tomographic scans.

Prior studies from our institution have shown that single photon emission computed tomography is sensitive (100%) in predicting patients at risk for serious arrhythmias. However, the positive predictive value is low (15% to 20%). The purpose of this study was to determine if quantitative analysis of single photon emission computed tomographic defects could improve predictive value. One hundred seventy-five patients with positive single photon emission computed tomographic scans were studied. One hundred two patients developed arrhythmias, 42 of which were ventricular. Arrhythmias were associated with all defect loci and all defect sizes. The incidence of arrhythmias did increase with increasing size. Patients were at risk for arrhythmias up to 72 hours after trauma. The value of single photon emission computed tomography is its ability to predict patients at risk for arrhythmias. This study shows that any single photon emission computed tomographic defect, regardless of location or size, is a significant predictor of arrhythmias.     

The trend of using computed tomography in the detection of acute thoracic aortic and branch vessel injury after blunt thoracic trauma: single-center experience over 13 years

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to review the trend of using chest computed tomography (CT) and aortography in evaluating patients with blunt thoracic trauma. METHODS: A total of 85 patients who had blunt aortic injury diagnosed by chest CT, aortography, or both were included in this study. RESULTS: Aortography was the dominant modality before 1998, and the use of chest CT has increased to 50% of patients with aortic injuries as of 2001. Isolated aortic, branch vessel, or combined injuries were found in 71 (84%), 11 (13%), and 3 (4%) patients, respectively. All 14 patients with branch vessel injuries were diagnosed by aortography. Ninety-eight percent of patients with aortography were true-positives, and 20% of patients with chest CT had indirect signs of aortic injury. CONCLUSION: Our institution has increased the use of chest CT to evaluate blunt thoracic trauma. Patients with indirect signs of aortic injuries shown on chest CT require further evaluation. In our experience, angiography remains the optimal diagnostic modality for evaluating aortic branch vessel injuries.     

Comparison of multiplane transesophageal echocardiography and contrast-enhanced helical CT in the diagnosis of blunt traumatic cardiovascular injuries

BACKGROUND: Multiplane transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and helical computed tomography (CT) of the chest have been validated separately against aortography for the diagnosis of acute traumatic aortic injuries (ATAI). However, their respective diagnostic accuracy in identifying blunt traumatic cardiovascular lesions has not been compared. METHODS: During a 3-yr period, 110 consecutive patients with severe blunt chest trauma (age: 41 +/- 17 yr; injury severity score: 34 +/- 14) prospectively underwent TEE and chest CT as part of their initial evaluation. Results of both imaging methods were interpreted independently by experienced investigators and subsequently compared. All cases of subadventitial acute traumatic aortic injury were surgically confirmed. RESULTS: Seventeen patients had vascular injury and 11 had cardiac lesions. TEE and CT identified all subadventitial disruptions involving the aortic isthmus (n = 10) or the ascending aorta (n = 1) that necessitated surgical repair. In contrast, CT only depicted one disruption of the innominate artery. TEE detected injuries involving the intimal or medial layer, or both, of the aortic isthmus in four patients with apparently normal CT results who underwent successful conservative treatment. All cardiac injuries but two were identified only by TEE. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with severe blunt chest trauma, TEE and CT have similar diagnostic accuracy for the identification of surgical acute traumatic aortic injuy. TEE also allows the diagnosis of associated cardiac injuries and is more sensitive than CT for the identification of intimal or medial lesions of the thoracic aorta.     

Treatment strategy of cardiac rupture due to blunt trauma

Cardiac trauma is common in blunt injuries of the chest. However, survival after a cardiac rupture is not common, and only a certain percentage of the patients reach the hospital alive. We report on 3 cases of successful treatment of cardiac rupture due to blunt trauma; one by emergency surgical repair, and the others, conservative medical treatment. Echocardiography and computed tomography demonstrated pericardial effusion in all cases, and emergency pericardial drainage was performed. Gas analyses of arterial blood and pericardial effusion were made simultaneously. When the oxygen saturation levels of the pericardial effusion were lower than those of the arterial blood, we suspected the cardiac injury to be right-sided. When they were almost at the same level, we suspected it to be left-sided. Simultaneous gas analysis of arterial blood and pericardial effusion is considered to be an easy and useful diagnostic method to decide not only treatment strategy, but also operative approach and procedure in patients suffering from cardiac tamponade following cardiac injuries.     

Computed tomographic evaluation to exclude traumatic aortic disruption.

Traumatic aortic disruption from blunt trauma remains a lethal injury. The role of computed tomographic (CT) scanning in the diagnosis of traumatic aortic disruption (TAD) has been debated and varying results have been reported. We reviewed our experience with 133 consecutive cases of blunt trauma with abnormal findings on chest x-ray films of sufficient concern to require further evaluation for TAD. Of the 105 patients who underwent CT scanning as the initial evaluation, 11 (10%) required aortography (Ao) for diagnosis; seven had TAD. Twenty-eight patients with highly suggestive signs of TAD underwent Ao as the initial diagnostic test; five had TAD. Ten of the 12 patients (83%) undergoing surgical repair had good results; one died of exsanguination at surgery and the other suffered a profound neurologic injury. Follow-up by phone or chart review at 6 months to more than 5 years after injury revealed no late mortalities from unrecognized TAD. We conclude that high quality CT evaluation of patients with worrisome chest x-ray films following blunt trauma can be used to exclude TAD in the majority of cases. Aortography is reserved for cases in which there is a high clinical suspicion of TAD and for those patients in whom TAD cannot be confidently excluded by CT scanning.     

Myocardial contusion: when does it have clinical significance?

A retrospective review of 53 patients with blunt chest trauma admitted to a monitored hospital bed demonstrated a single elderly patient with multiple injuries who developed dysrhythmias requiring treatment. The remainder of the relatively young group had no significant cardiac sequelae. We conclude that the routine use of expensive monitoring and extensive diagnostic tests in the young blunt chest trauma victim should be reconsidered.     

Emergency operation for traumatic thoracic aortic rupture diagnosed by enhanced chest computed tomography; report of a case

Thoracic aortic injury caused by blunt chest trauma is often fatal. Although aortography had been inevitable for thoracic surgery until recently, image of computed tomography (CT) is often superior to aortogram nowadays. We present a case of 64-yaer-old man with blunt chest trauma by traffic accident, who was successfully diagnosed and operated without invasive aortography. Thoracic aortic rupture was suspected by plain chest X-ray. His enhanced CT showed the localized leakage of contrast media near the arterial ligament of aortic arch. Because his condition was critically ill, operation was performed immediately without aortography. There found Y-shaped tear at the distal aortic arch, and was replaced with a prosthetic graft. Operation was performed under left heart bypass using heparin-coated circuit and centrifugal pump. We would stress that the enhanced chest CT is sufficiently diagnostic in thoracic aortic trauma like the present case.     

Posttraumatic aneurysm of the brachiocephalic trunk: a rare injury

We report on a posttraumatic aneurysm of the brachiocephalic trunk, something which is rather rare. The injury was caused by blunt chest trauma following a car accident. Computed tomography could not find the brachiocephalic lesion. In patients with fractures of the upper ribs after blunt chest trauma, angiography should be done to exclude severe injuries of the aorta and brachiocephalic vessels.     

The use of chest computed tomography versus chest X-ray in patients with major blunt trauma

INTRODUCTION: Computed tomography (CT) scans are often used in the evaluation of patients with blunt trauma. This study identifies the clinical features associated with further diagnostic information obtained on a CT chest scan compared with a standard chest X-ray in patients sustaining blunt trauma to the chest. METHODS: A 2-year retrospective survey of 141 patients who attended a Level 1 trauma centre for blunt trauma and had a chest CT scan and a chest X-ray as part of an initial assessment was undertaken. Data extracted from the medical record included vital signs, laboratory findings, interventions and the type and severity of injury. RESULTS: The CT chest scan is significantly more likely to provide further diagnostic information for the management of blunt trauma compared to a chest X-ray in patients with chest wall tenderness (OR=6.73, 95% CI=2.56, 17.70, p<0.001), reduced air-entry (OR=4.48, 95% CI=1.33, 15.02, p=0.015) and/or abnormal respiratory effort (OR=4.05, 95% CI=1.28, 12.66, p=0.017). CT scan was significantly more effective than routine chest X-ray in detecting lung contusions, pneumothoraces, mediastinal haematomas, as well as fractured ribs, scapulas, sternums and vertebrae. CONCLUSION: In alert patients without evidence of chest wall tenderness, reduced air-entry or abnormal respiratory effort, selective use of CT chest scanning as a screening tool could be adopted. This is supported by the fact that most chest injuries can be treated with simple observation. Intubated patients, in most instances, should receive a routine CT chest scan in their first assessment.