The impact of gender and age matching for long-term graft survival in living donor renal transplantation

In renal transplantation, donor age and allograft size are known to have an important influence on the outcome of the graft reflecting functional renal mass. Women tend to have smaller kidneys with 17% fewer nephrons than male kidneys. The number of glomeruli per kidney as well as the mean glomerular volume closely correlate with kidney weight and negatively correlate with subject age. We evaluated the impact of gender and age matching in living-donor renal transplantation on long-term graft survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four groups were discerned among 614 renal transplants, according to donor and recipient gender: Group 1 was male donor to male recipient; Group 2 was male donor to female recipient; Group 3 was female donor to male recipient; and Group 4 was female donor to female recipient. We analyzed long-term graft survival and risk factors between the four groups as well as according to age matching. Statistical significance was determined by the Kaplan-Meier method and log rank test (P < .05). RESULT: The graft survival rates at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years were 92.62%, 88.13%, 82.37%, and 76.07%, respectively. The risk factors affecting long-term graft survival were donor age, donor gender, acute rejection rate, and HLA-DR matching. Among the four groups, the graft survival rates of Group 3 (female donor to male recipient) were significantly different from the other groups (P = .0165). Also, the long-term graft survival rates according to age differences were significantly different between older donors than recipients and younger donors than recipients in each group (P = .0213). CONCLUSION: The importance of inadequate renal mass is magnified in high-risk recipients. Age matching could perhaps improve the results of transplantation, particularly when kidneys from older donors are used. Consideration of age and gender as criteria for the choice of donors and recipients may be considered in organ allocation.     

The impact of sex and age matching for long-term graft survival in living donor renal transplantation

BACKGROUND: Deficient functional renal mass leads to progressive renal injury owing to the detrimental effects of glomerular hyperfiltration. Therefore, renal transplant mass is an important determinant of outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 614 living donor renal transplantations performed from 1979 to 2002. Patients were divided into 4 groups according to donor-recipient gender differences: group 1 (male to male), group 2 (male to female), group 3 (female to male), and group 4 (female to female). We analyzed the clinical and immunological data to compare the 4 groups with respect to long-term graft survival, age gender, acute rejection episodes an HLA matching. We used the Kaplan-Meier method with the log-rank test to assess graft survival. RESULTS: The actuarial graft survival rate was 86.24% at 5 years for donors younger than 50 years of age compared with 73.15% for those older than 50 years (P = .0000). The graft survival from younger donors than recipients was 85.23% at 5 years compared with 80.35% for older donors (P = .0213). The graft survival of group 3 (female donor to male recipient) was 75.12% at 5 years compared with 85.72%, 85.33%, and 83.16% for groups 1, 2, and 4, respectively (P = .0165). The main parameters significantly associated with graft survival were donor age (P = .0000), acute rejection episode (P = .0000), donor gender (P = .0215). HLA-DR matching (P = .0516), and donor and recipient age matching (P = .0213). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that the sex and age matching between donors and recipients should be considered as a criterion in the choice of donor and recipient pairs for living donor renal transplantation.     

Influence of pretransplant pregnancy on survival of renal allografts from living donors

BACKGROUND: The presence of a small number of cells of donor origin in organ transplant recipients (microchimerism) may influence allograft survival and may induce tolerance. Postpartum women may be microchimeric to offspring hematopoietic cells up to 27 years. We hypothesized that mothers receiving renal allografts from offspring would have better graft survival compared with either fathers receiving allografts from offspring, or mothers receiving allografts from nonoffspring donors. METHODS: We analyzed 1803 living related kidney transplants from the UNOS database performed between January 1, 1990, and December 31, 1995, for mothers and fathers who received grafts from offspring with one haplotype match. We also compared these mothers with parous females receiving a kidney from nonoffspring donors (spouse and other biologically related or unrelated family members). A multivariate logistic regression method was used to analyze the effect of donor type, as well as other recipient, donor, and transplant characteristics, on graft and patient survival. RESULTS: Mothers receiving one haplotype-matched offspring renal allografts did not have better graft survival at 1 or 3 years posttransplant compared with fathers receiving similar grafts. There was also no difference in graft or patient survival between mothers receiving kidney grafts from either offspring or nonoffspring donors. Graft survival in mothers with multiple pregnancies was poorer than those with a single pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: It is possible that persistent microchimerism of fetal cells in maternal circulation may, for some mothers, cause a detectable improvement in graft or patient survival. Comparison of female and male recipients from the UNOS database did not reveal any differences in outcomes. If mothers are tolerant to their offspring, our results indicate that this microchimerism may not improve renal allograft or patient survival in offspring donor to maternal recipient combinations. Lastly, more sensitive pretransplant cross-match assays may need to be implemented in multiparous women, given our results.     

Risk Factors for Graft Survival After Liver Transplantation from Donation After Cardiac Death Donors: An Analysis of OPTN/UNOS Data

Due to increasing use of allografts from donation after cardiac death (DCD) donors, we evaluated DCD liver transplants and impact of recipient and donor factors on graft survival. Liver transplants from DCD donors reported to UNOS were analyzed against donation after brain death (DBD) donor liver transplants performed between 1996 and 2003. We defined a recipient cumulative relative risk (RCRR) using significant risk factors identified from a Cox regression analysis: age; medical condition at transplantation; regraft status; dialysis received and serum creatinine. Graft survival from DCD donors (71% at 1 year and 60% at 3 years) were significantly inferior to DBD donors (80% at 1 year and 72% at 3 years, p < 0.001). Low-risk recipients (RCRR < or = 1.5) with low-risk DCD livers (DWIT < 30 min and CIT < 10 h, n = 226) achieved graft survival rates (81% and 67% at 1 and 3 years, respectively) not significantly different from recipients with DBD allografts (80% and 72% at 1 and 3 years, respectively, log-rank p = 0.23). Liver allografts from DCD donors may be used to increase the cadaveric donor pool, with favorable graft survival rates achieved when low-risk grafts are transplanted in a low-risk setting. Whether transplantation of these organs in low-risk recipients provides a survival benefit compared to the waiting list is unknown.     

Retroactive application of the new kidney allocation system to renal transplants performed in the ECD/SCD era

The kidney allocation system (KAS) aims to improve deceased donor kidney transplant outcomes by matching of donor allografts and kidney recipients using the kidney donor risk index (KDRI) and recipient estimated post‐transplant survival (EPTS) indices. In this single‐center study, KAS was retroactively applied to 573 adult deceased donor kidney transplants (2004–2012) performed in the extended criteria/standard criteria donor (ECD/SCD) era. Donor KDRI and recipient EPTS were calculated, and transplants were analyzed to identify KAS fits. These were defined as allocation of top 20% allografts to top 20% recipients and bottom 80% allografts to bottom 80% recipients. On retroactive calculation, 70.2% of all transplants fit the KAS. Transplants that fit the KAS had inferior 1‐ and 5‐yr patient survival (95.5% vs. 98.8%, p = 0.048, and 83.4% vs. 91.7%, p = 0.018) and similar 1‐ and 5‐yr graft survival compared to transplants that did not fit the KAS (91.3% vs. 94.1%, p = 0.276, and 72.7% vs. 73.9%, p = 0.561). While EPTS correlated with recipient survival (HR = 2.96, p < 0.001), KDRI correlated with both recipient (HR = 3.56, p < 0.001) and graft survival (HR = 3.23, p < 0.001). Overall, retroactive application of the KAS to transplants performed in the ECD/SCD era did not identify superior patient survival for kidneys allocated in accordance with the KAS.     

The influence of increased age and age matching on graft survival after first cadaveric renal transplantation.

We examined the influence of donor and recipient age as well as close donor and recipient age matching by analysis of the actuarial survival of 397 consecutive first cadaveric renal transplants carried out in the years 1987 to 1990. Graft failure was defined as return to dialysis, transplant nephrectomy, or death of the recipient from any cause. Overall 1-, 2-, and 3-year actuarial graft survival was 87, 84, and 79%. No effect on graft survival in adult patients was seen of advanced age of either donor or recipient. The source of the donor whether from within or outside the North Western Regional Health Authority did not influence outcome whatever the donor age. Results from patients in whom the donor was within 5 years of the recipient's age were no different from those obtained when the age difference was greater than 5 years. These data do not support the hypothesis that close age matching influences graft survival. Age matching need not be used as a recipient selection criterion. As neither recipient nor donor age influenced early graft survival, consideration should be given to increasing the average age of both donors and recipients.     

Transplant recipient renal function is donor renal mass- and recipient gender-dependent.

The effect of both donor renal mass and gender on renal function, in both gender recipients, was examined. Qualifying consecutive living-donor renal transplants (n = 730) were stratified into 4 donor-recipient groups: female-female (n = 177), male-female (n = 151), female-male (n = 240), male-male (n = 162). Groups were equivalent in age, race, body mass index (BMI), match, ischemia time, operative time, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Female recipients had lower serum creatinine (Cr(s)). Male recipients had higher Cr(s) wherever they received a female allograft. Male recipients of male kidneys had a higher eGFR than all other groups for 3 years. Renal function of the recipient correlated with the renal mass of the donor within each group. Male and female kidneys functioned equivalently in the female-recipient environment. Large nephron-mass male donor kidneys function more poorly in female recipients. The male kidney loses 15-20 ml/min eGFR in the female host. The diminished graft function may be related to androgen deprivation. Female and male donor kidneys function equivalently in the male recipient if adjusted for renal mass transplanted. Female kidneys improve eGFR by 7-10 ml/min by being transplanted into a male environment. Donor renal mass and gender affect recipient graft function Expectations of ultimate recipient renal function should take into account both the gender and mass disparity of the donor-recipient pair.     

Pediatric liver and kidney transplantation with allografts from DCD donors: A review of UNOS data

INTRODUCTION: Donation after cardiac death (DCD) is recognized as an important source of allografts to bridge the growing disequilibrium between the number of donors and recipients. Current transplant experience with DCD organs has focused on the adult recipient population, however little is known about the pediatric recipient experience. While there is increasing acceptance of these grafts in adults, transplant centers appear reluctant to use these grafts in the pediatric population. METHODS: We reviewed the United Network for Organ Sharing database from 1995-2005 to determine the national experience with pediatric recipients of DCD organs. RESULTS: Among 4026 renal transplants performed in children 18 years and younger, 26 (0.6%) received a renal allograft from a DCD donor. Ten (38.5%) received kidney allografts from pediatric donors (age < or = 18) and 16 (61.5%) from adult donors (age > 18 years). Graft survival at one and five years was 82.5%, 74.3% for kidneys from DCD donors compared to 89.6%, 64.8% from brain dead donors (DBD) (P = 0.7). Among 4991 liver transplants, 19 (0.4%) were from DCD donors. Sixteen patients (84.2%) received livers from pediatric donors and three (15.8%) from adult donors. Graft survival at one and five years was 89.2%, 79.3% for livers from DCD, compared to 75.6%, 65.8% for DBD (P = 0.3). CONCLUSION: The use of DCD donors in the pediatric population is very limited; however graft survival is comparable to DBD grafts. Although pediatric centers may have been reluctant to utilize this donor source, this limited experience demonstrates that the select use of DCD organs can produce acceptable and durable graft survival in the pediatric population.     

Transplantation of single pediatric kidneys into adult recipients

AIM: To evaluate the outcome of single pediatric kidneys transplanted into adult recipients. METHODS: A retrospective single-center review was performed of transplants from donors less than 5 years of age. Outcomes were compared with recipients of grafts from donors 18 to 45 years transplanted during the same time period. RESULTS: Thirty single renal transplants from pediatric donors and 117 transplants from adult donors between 18 and 45 years of age were performed during the study period. The mean age of the pediatric donors was 2.9 +/- 0.8 years versus 31.5 +/- 8.9 years for adult donors (P < .001). The mean age of the recipients of pediatric donors was 41.9 +/- 13 years versus 48 +/- 12.6 years for recipients of adult grafts (P = .020). The mean recipient weight of pediatric donors was 55.9 +/- 7.8 kg versus 78.0 +/- 17.7 kg for recipients of adult donors (P < .001). Sixty-six percent of pediatric donor recipients were of female gender compared to only 36% of adult donor recipients (P = .005). Death-censored actuarial graft survivals at 1 and 4 years for recipients of pediatric donor grafts were 90% and 85% compared to 93% and 85% for recipients of adult donor grafts (P = NS). The mean calculated creatinine clearances of adult donor graft recipients at 1 and 4 years posttransplantation were 70.8 +/- 26.5 and 73.7 +/- 27.2 mL/min, respectively, compared to 50.3 +/- 20.1 and 56.3 +/- 21.4 mL/min for pediatric donor grafts (P < .01 at 1 and 4 years). CONCLUSION: The use of single pediatric donor kidneys provides an excellent opportunity to safely expand the donor pool.     

Improvement of kidney transplant regraft results by using trauma death donors

Patients who have lost a transplanted kidney are widely recognized as high-risk patients for retransplantation. We have found a profound difference in cadaver kidney regraft survival associated with the age and sex of the donor. Kidneys from male cadaver donors yielded significantly higher graft survival rates than kidneys from female donors. The difference in graft survival at one year was 7% for all first transplants (n = 2974), 14% if the recipient was sensitized, and 18% in 688 patients being regrafted. The difference was even more striking in regraft recipients of kidneys from young male donors (72% one-year graft survival) as compared with recipients of kidneys from older female donors (44% one-year graft survival). The donor age and sex effects correlated well with the cause of donor death. Young male donors accounted for 59% of trauma deaths whereas older female donors made up only 7%. Nontrauma donors, on the other hand, were 38% older female and 14% younger male. The survival of trauma-death donor kidneys in regrafted patients was 69% at one year and 37% for nontrauma donor kidneys, a 32% difference (P less than 0.001). These results indicate that regraft survival could be significantly increased through the use of cadaver kidneys from trauma death donors.     

Renal transplantations performed using non-heart-beating organ donors: going back to the future?

BACKGROUND: As more expanded-criteria organ donors are used to bridge the widening gap between organ supply and demand, non-heart-beating (NHB) donors will become increasingly important. The purpose of this study was to analyze renal transplant outcomes using this source of cadaveric (CAD) organs and compare the results with heart-beating organ sources. METHODS: Data from 98,698 adult CAD renal transplant recipients and 34,531 living donor renal transplant recipients registered in the U. S. Renal Data System database between January 1993 and June 2000 were analyzed. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to compare graft and patient survival rates between NHB, CAD, and living donor transplant recipients. Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify risk factors for NHB donor recipients, while adjusting for potential confounding variables. RESULTS: Recipients of NHB donor organs experienced nearly twice the incidence of delayed graft function (DGF) compared with heart-beating donors (42.4% vs. 23.3%, respectively). NHB donor transplants experienced comparable allograft survival when compared with CAD transplants at 6 years (73.2% vs. 72.5%, respectively; P=NS); patient survival was greater at 6 years for NHB compared with CAD renal transplant recipients (80.9% vs. 77.8%, respectively; P=NS). Significant factors for allograft loss for NHB donor organ recipients included the following: organ used for repeat transplants; DGF; donor age older than 35 years; and head trauma as a cause of initial injury (relative risk 2.74, 1.90, 1.78, and 1.41, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Although exhibiting elevated DGF rates, allograft and patient survival rates of transplants from NHB donor sources are equivalent to those from conventional CAD sources. Donor age, recipient transplant number, female recipient, mechanism of injury, and DGF were the most pertinent variables leading to poor outcomes.     

Gender disparity of living donor renal transplantation in East China

Gender disparity among living kidney donors is common world wide, which demonstrates different social and economic problems in different countries. However, few data are available for China. Therefore, we retrospectively analyzed all 139 living donor renal transplants performed in our center between 2003 and 2010. The annual number of living donor renal transplants increased from six to 26 cases per year during the observation period. Among them, 69.2% of all kidney donors were females, whereas 79.5% of the recipients were male. The average age of recipients was 34.1 ± 7.6 yr and 94% (110/117) were younger than 44 yr. In contrast, 53% (62/117) of all donors were “middle‐aged” (45–59 yr) with an average donor age of 47.8 ± 9.2 yr. The first‐degree relatives accounted for the majority of the donor pool, as the most common donor‐recipient combination consisted of mother to son. In conclusion, there was a male and young preponderance among recipients, and a female and middle‐aged one among donors of living kidney transplants in our transplant center, which might be related to socio‐cultural as well as economic factors.     

Improving utilization of deceased donor kidneys by matching recipient and graft survival

Younger renal transplant recipients often outlive their allografts, whereas older recipients often die before their allograft fails. Thus, our aim was to assess the utility of matching recipient and graft survival to improve allocation of deceased donor kidneys. We reviewed the records of 49,206 patients (United Network for Organ Sharing, 1995-2002). Donor grafts were stratified by Deceased Donor Score (DDS). We observed a disparity between recipient survival and renal graft survival which contributed to an annual gap between supply and demand of renal transplants. Utilization of DDS and distribution of marginal kidneys to older recipients would improve allocation.     

The use of "marginal" donors for organ transplantation. The influence of donor age on outcome

The influence of donor age on outcome was studied in the recipients of 12,131 cadaveric renal allografts, 3026 heart allografts, and 2913 liver allografts with followup information in the UNOS data base for transplants performed between 10/1/87 and 12/31/89. For recipients of kidney transplants, donors of ages 6-15 had significantly better 1-year graft survival than donors of ages 56-65, but the difference was only 7.0%. Donors of age greater than 65 actually did better than donors ages 56-65, but donors less than or equal to 5 were less satisfactory. Kidneys from older donors survived as well as kidneys from younger donors in patients with repeat transplants, diabetes, black race, age over 45, O HLA or 5 and 6 HLA matches, delayed graft function, shared kidneys and PRA greater than 50. For kidney recipients, multifactorial analysis by Cox regression showed that donor age was less important than the use of ALG, donor race, diabetes or peak PRA in ages 16-45, delayed function, repeat transplant, and HLA match. Recipients of heart transplants from donors ages 45-55 had 1-year graft survival that was 8.4% less than recipients of hearts from donors age 16-45. However, 32.7% of heart patients died during the first 12 months after listing without benefit of a transplant. Liver transplant recipients of donor ages 16-45 had 10.8% better 1-year graft survival than recipients of donors greater than 45, but a greater percentage of older donors were transplanted to high risk and older recipients. Tragically, 24.3% of patients listed for liver transplantation died within 12 months without a transplant. This analysis shows that satisfactory graft survival can be achieved using older donors and that age in itself should not be a barrier to organ donation, providing that organ function is normal and that specific disease of the organ is absent.     

Gender-related differences of renal mass supply and metabolic demand after living donor kidney transplantation

Kidney donation from female donors to male recipients has been reported to be associated with decreased allograft survival. Whether there was a gender-related inadequacy between donor nephron supply and recipient functional demand was investigated in this study. One hundred ninety-five living donor kidney transplant recipients that had neither ischemic injury, episode of rejection, nor any complication were included. Weights and heights of both donors and recipients were recorded to calculate body surface area, lean body weight, and body mass index. The donated kidney was weighed just after cold flush, and the recipient's serum creatinine (Scr) was measured on a daily basis post-operatively. When the recipient's Scr reached the baseline, a 24-h urine was collected for the amount of proteinuria (Upr), creatinine excretion (Ucr) and creatinine clearance (Ccr) calculation. The effect of donor and recipient gender was analysed by independent sample t-test. On average, male donors and recipients were heavier and taller than females. However, the mass of kidneys donated from men and women were not statistically different. The gender-related differences in post-transplant Scr and Ucr of recipients were associated with the differences in the parameters of metabolic demands of recipients rather than with the weight of implanted kidney (renal mass supply) or with pre-operative renal functions of donors (functional supply). The early graft function is not determined by donor gender. The effect of recipient gender on the graft function depends on the metabolic demands, which are higher in male recipients.     

Impact of donor age on survival and fibrosis progression in patients with hepatitis C undergoing liver transplantation using HCV+ allografts.

Studies have suggested that the use of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-positive (HCV+) donor allografts has no impact on survival. However, no studies have examined the effect that HCV+ donor histology has upon recipient and graft survival. We evaluated the clinical outcome and impact of histological features in HCV patients transplanted using HCV+ livers. We reviewed all patients transplanted for HCV at our institution from 1988 to 2004; 39 received HCV+ allografts and 580 received HCV-negative (HCV-) allografts. Survival curves compared graft and patient survival. Each HCV+ allograft was stringently matched to a control of HCV- graft recipients. No significant difference in survival was noted between recipients of HCV+ livers and controls. Patients receiving HCV+ allografts from older donors (age > or =50 yr) had higher rates of graft failure (hazard ratio, 2.74) and death rates (hazard ratio, 2.63) compared to HCV- allograft recipients receiving similarly-aged older donor livers. Matched case-control analysis revealed that recipients of HCV+ allografts had more severe fibrosis post-liver transplantation than recipients of HCV- livers (P = 0.008). More advanced fibrosis was observed in HCV+ grafts from older donors compared to HCV+ grafts from younger donors (P = 0.012). In conclusion, recipients of HCV+ grafts from older donors have higher rates of death and graft failure, and develop more extensive fibrosis than HCV- graft recipients from older donors. Recipients of HCV+ grafts, regardless of donor age, develop more advanced liver fibrosis than recipients of HCV- grafts.     

Influence of donor and recipient gender on early graft function after living donor kidney transplantation

Long-term effects of donor and recipient gender on the outcome of living donor kidney transplantation have been examined but the impact on early graft function is less certain. In this study, we analyzed age, gender, body weight, height, body surface area (BSA), and lean body weight (LBW) of both donors and recipients. Preoperatively we collected 24-hour urine samples to measure creatinine excretion from donor and postoperatively we determined when the recipient serum creatinine (Scr) reached baseline levels. Variables included were ischemic times, kidney graft weight, duration of dialysis, cause of end-stage renal disease (ESRD), degree of HLA match, and mismatch, types of immunosuppression (cyclosporine or FK506, dual or triple), and episodes of acute rejection. The variables were analyzed by independent sample t tests and chi-square statistics using SPSS. Values of P < .05 were considered significant. Male patients of both donors and recipients were significantly taller and heavier (higher BSA and LBW) than female. Urinary 24-hour creatinine excretion was greater in male patients whether donors or recipients. There were no statistical differences in graft weight or creatinine clearance based on the gender of the donor or recipient. The creatinine of male donors or recipients was higher than that of females. The other variables were not significantly different. In conclusion, the effect of donor or recipient gender on early graft function depends on the metabolic demands, which are higher in male recipients.     

Outcomes of Pancreas Transplantation in the United States Using Cardiac-Death Donors

Organs donated after cardiac death (DCD) are used to expand the donor pool. We analyzed the outcomes in the United States of pancreatic transplantation of organs from DCD donors performed between 1993 and 2003.
We used the OPTN/UNOS Registry to compare outcomes of primary pancreas allografts from DCD donors and donors after brain death (DBD). The primary endpoints were graft failure and patient death. A national survey regarding the use of DCD donors in pancreas transplantation was conducted among the directors of pancreas transplant centers.
Data were obtained on 47 simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplants (SPK) and 10 solitary pancreas transplants from DCD donors and on 2431 SPK and 1607 solitary pancreas transplants from DBD donors. Recipients of a SPK transplants from DCD and DBD donors had equivalent patient and graft survival rates at 1, 3 and 5 years. For recipients of SPK transplants, the wait for organs from DCD donors was significantly shorter than that for organs from DBD donors. SPK recipients of organs from DCD donors had longer hospital stays than did recipients of organs from DBD donors. With renal allografts, the incidence of delayed graft function was almost four times higher with organs from DCD donors than with organs from DBD donors.
Selective use of organs from DCD donors is safe for pancreas transplantation.     

Improved patient and primary renal allograft survival in uremic diabetic recipients

From January 1968 to December 1981, 470 uremic diabetic patients received primary renal allografts at the University of Minnesota. Until 1979, the patient and graft survival rates were less good in diabetic than in nondiabetic recipients. Since 1979, the results in diabetics have been at least equal to those achieved in nondiabetic patients. Two-year actuarial patient and graft survival rates in diabetic renal allograft recipients were, respectively, 71 and 66% from 1968 to 1976 (n = 156), 78 and 64% from 1976 to 1979 (n = 187), and 88 and 82% from 1979 to 1981 (n = 127). Improved survival rates were seen in all donor source and recipient age categories. For comparison, the 2-year patient and graft survival rates in nondiabetic renal allograft recipients who received transplants between 1979 and 1981 (n = 162) were 92 and 79%. Changes associated with improved survival rates included performance of pretransplant splenectomy on all patients except those receiving grafts from HLA-identical siblings, deliberate transfusions of blood from greater than or equal to 5 random donors at least 1 month before transplantation, intensive insulin therapy for diabetic management post-transplant, and less vigorous treatment of repetitive rejection episodes. The current results show that diabetic recipients are no longer at higher risk than nondiabetics for graft or patient loss, at least during the first 2 years after transplantation.     

Kombinierte Nieren-Pankreas-Transplantation

BACKGROUND: Differences in graft survival due to gender have been reported after transplantation of the kidney, liver, and heart. However, little is known about the role of donor and recipient gender in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation. METHODS: Single-centre analysis was performed of first simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantations performed between 1994 and 2005 at the Bochum Transplant Center in Germany (n=218). RESULTS: Recipients of female donor organs exhibited acute organ rejections earlier and more frequently (P<0.05). Male recipients of organs from male donors had a lower risk of acute rejection than recipients of female donor organs (P<0.05). In addition to female donor gender, higher donor age and early kidney dysfunction were risk factors for perioperative rejection (P<0.05). Long-term kidney and pancreas function was best in male-donor-to-female-recipient transplants over the time periods of 7 and 3 years, respectively (P<0.05). Risk factors of long-term organ failure were: the need of revision laparotomy, organ rejection, and early postoperative organ dysfunction (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: This is the first report of graft function after simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation looking specifically at gender differences with respect to donor and recipient. There was an increased risk of organ rejection of female donor organs.