Discogenic pain in acute nonspecific low-back pain

Acute nonspecific low-back pain is characterized by the sudden onset and severe unendurable low-back pain without radicular pain or neurological deficit in the lower extremities. The study was carried out using 55 patients who visited our hospital for acute nonspecific low-back pain, who exhibited degeneration on T2-weighted MR images, and underwent intradiscal injection of local anesthetics,steroid and contrast medium. Intervertebral disc sites with an obvious enhanced region in the posterior annulus of the disc on enhanced T1-weghted MR images was selected for intradiscal injection. When no enhaced region was detected, the most severely degenerated disc on T2-weighted MR images was selected. Acute nonspecific low-back pain with an improvement rate of 70% or higher 5min after injection was judged to be discogenic. The clinical characteristics and pathogenesis of discogenic acute nonspecific low-back pain were investigated. Forty of the 55 patients (73%) had discogenic acute nonspecific low-back pain. As for the characteristics of patients, the mean age was 37 years, and onset occurred upon casual daily movements in 18 patients (45%). Nineteen patients (48%) had bilateral low-back pain, and 29 patients (73%) had no tenderness in the paravertebral muscles. On plain X-ray radiograms, degeneration of the disc was normal or mild in 36 patients(91%). On the discograms, a radial tear extending to the posterior annulus was noted in all patients, but epidural leakage was seen only in six patients (15%). The degree of disc degeneration on T2-weighted MR images (Gibsons classification) was grade 3 in 30 patients (75%). Gadolinium-DTPA enhanced T1-weighted MR images showed an obvious enhanced region in the posterior annulus of the intervertebral disc in 19 patients (48%). As for the clinical characteristics of discogenic acute nonspecific low-back pain, the relatively young adult patients had no tenderness in the paravertebral muscles, and showed moderately degererated intervertebral discs. The pathogenesis of discogenic acute nonspecific low-back pain is mostly considered to be a re-rupture in an asymptomatic ruputured region in the posterior annulus, repaired by granulation tissue, in a moderately degenerated intervertebral disc with a radial tear.     

Myofascial pain in patients with postthoracotomy pain syndrome

OBJECTIVE: Postthoracotomy pain syndrome is generally considered to be neuropathic pain due to intercostal nerve injury. However, nonneuropathic pain can also occur following thoracic surgery. We present a series of cases with postthoracotomy pain syndrome in which myofascial pain was thought to be a causative component of postthoracotomy pain syndrome. CASE REPORT: Twenty-seven patients (17 men and 10 women) were treated with trigger point injections, intercostal nerve blocks, and/or epidural blocks. Clinical criteria were used to diagnose the myofascial pain. A visual analogue scale was used, and sensory disturbances were recorded before and after treatment. A trigger point in a taut muscular band within the scapular region, which we diagnosed as myofascial pain, was observed in 67% of the patients. The existence of this trigger point significantly increased the rate of success for the treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Postthoracotomy pain may result, at least in part, from a nonneuropathic origin (myofascial pain). It is recommended that each patient be examined in detail to determine whether there is a trigger point in a taut muscular band within the scapular region. If found, this point is suggested as a good area for anesthetic injection.     

Improvement in physician pain perception with using pain scales

Background and aims

Acute pain is the most common reason for visits to the emergency department (ED). The underuse of analgesics occurs in a large proportion of ED patients. The physician’s accurate assessment of patients’ pain is a key element to improved pain management. The purpose of this study was to assess if physicians’ perception of pain can improve with looking at the pain score of the patient marked on VAS.

Study design

This was a single-center, cross-sectional prospective observational study, that took place in an academic ED.

Methods

All adult ED patients presenting with a painful condition were enrolled to the study. In the first phase of the study, the physician rated his/her opinion about the patient’s pain on a 100 mm VAS, in a blinded fashion to the patient’s pain score. In the second phase, the physician rated his/her opinion after looking at the pain scale marked by patient.

Results

587 patients (295, in first and 292, in second phase) were enrolled. The groups were not statistically different for demographic data. The physician’s perception of pain was lower than the patient’s pain score at both phases of the study. Insight of the patient’s pain score on VAS increased the physician’s pain perception significantly (p?=?0.03). During the second phase, physicians ordered significantly more analgesic medications to the patients (p?=?0.03).

Conclusion

The physicians’ perception of the patients’ pain differs significantly from the pain that the patient is experiencing. VAS helps to bring the physicians impression of pain perception to the level of pain that the patient is actually experiencing and resulted in ordering more analgesics to the patients. Implementation of a pain assessment tool can raise the physician’s perception of the pain and may improve pain management practices and patient satisfaction.

     

Characteristics of pain and pain management in the elderly

A COMMON SYMPTOM: Pain is a common and underestimated problem in older people who are likely to suffer from many acute and chronic conditions. DIFFICULT ASSESSMENT: Clinical assessment of pain often depends on the patient's ability to communicate his or her experience. If self-assessment of pain is not possible, behavioral hetero-evaluation instruments have been built for easy pain assessment by caregivers. ADJUSTED PAIN MANAGEMENT: As for younger patients, the most common strategy for pain management is the use of analgesic drugs. Special care should be taken however when such drugs are initiated in the elderly because increased sensitivity, prolonged drug half-life and adverse effects and drug interactions are more likely.     

Repeatability of pain drawings in a low back pain population

STUDY DESIGN: This is a prospective test-retest repeatability study. OBJECTIVE: The primary purpose of this study was to determine the test-retest repeatability, using a variety of scoring methods, of pain drawings in a group of chronic low back pain patients. The intraevaluator repeatability for the methods requiring subjective interpretation was also evaluated. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Pain drawings have been used in a variety of applications, including documentation of symptom location, as a tool for diagnosis and as a psychological screening tool. Accordingly, there have been several methods described for interpreting the drawings and several groups have investigated evaluators' abilities to replicate their interpretation. However, there has been less investigation of patients' consistency in completing the drawings. METHODS: The intraevaluator repeatability was determined for the two scoring methods requiring subjective interpretation by the evaluator rescoring the drawings 2 weeks after the initial scoring. To determine repeatability, drawings were completed on two occasions by 75 patients. Patients who indicated on a questionnaire that there had been no change in their pain location since their first clinic visit (the day the first drawing was completed) were included in the study. This subgroup consisted of 45 patients who completed pain drawings on two occasions separated by a mean of 244.2 days (range, 26-1197 days). Repeatability was assessed for several scoring methods described in the literature: penalty point system, overall visual inspection, body regions, and a grid method. RESULTS: Patients were consistent in completing the drawings, assessed by the various scoring methods. The worst repeatability values were for some of the sensation types. DISCUSSION: As reported by others, the intraevaluator repeatability was high. The results of this study, finding acceptable repeatability for most scoring methods for pain drawing completed on occasions separated by a relatively long period of time, support that the pain drawing is a stable instrument for use in chronic back pain patients.     

Back pain in childhood

Sixty-one children with back pain presented to the authors' department between 1978 and 1984, accounting for less than 2% of referrals in this age group. Approximately 50% had serious spinal disease, yet clinical findings could be unreliable in distinguishing such patients. In the absence of compelling physical signs, children with normal radiographs, white cell count, and sedimentation rate can be treated symptomatically and observed for some months before more invasive investigations are considered.     

Assessing pain in children

Acute pain is one of the most common experiences a child will have as a result of injury, illness or medical procedures. It is associated with anxiety, fear, stress and distress. Despite this, acute pain in a child is often inadequately assessed, managed and treated. The paediatric experience of acute pain involves the interaction of physiological, psychological, behavioural, developmental and situational factors. The subjectivity and multidimensional nature of pain requires clinicians to approach pain assessment using a combination of a child’s verbal report in conjunction with behavioural observation and physiological measures. Recognizing, treating and reassessing are essential components of acute pain assessment. Wherever possible a proactive approach should be adopted, where pain assessment is integrated into the holistic admission procedure rather than performed in isolation when the child is in pain. To provide effective pain management in children, healthcare professionals should use age and developmentally appropriate pain assessment tools, anticipate painful experiences and intervene accordingly. This article describes pain assessment tools for the management of acute pain in infants and children (excluding neonates).     

Groin pain in athletes

Groin pain in athletes is not infrequently a cause of frustration and aggravation to both doctor and patient. Complaints in the groin region can prove difficult to diagnose, particularly when they are of a chronic nature. These injuries are seen more commonly in sports that require specific use (or overuse) of the proximal musculature of the thigh and lower abdominal muscles. Some of the more common sports would be soccer, skiing, hurdling, and hockey. The differential diagnosis can cover a rather broad area of possibilities. Most common groin injuries are soft-tissue injuries, such as muscular strains, tendinitis, or contusions. More difficult areas to pinpoint are such entities as osteitis pubis, nerve entrapment, the so-called "sports hernia," or avulsion fractures, to name but a few. The evaluation of such patients includes a familiarity with the sport and possible mechanism of injury (i.e., taking a careful history), meticulous physical examination of the groin, abdomen, hips, spine, and lower extremities. Diagnostic examinations may or may not prove helpful in formulating a final diagnosis. Some patients may be required to undergo procedures, such as laparoscopic evaluation of the region to obtain adequate information that allows a proper diagnosis and treatment plan. This article describes many of the possible causes of groin pain in athletes. The list is quite lengthy, and only the more common problems will be discussed in detail. Presented, in part, at the American Hernia Society annual meeting in the Riverside Hilton, New Orleans, LA, USA in May 2001.     

Back pain in athletes

The athlete with back pain presents a clinical challenge. Self-limited symptoms must be distinguished from persistent or recurrent symptoms associated with identifiable pathology. Athletes involved in impact sports appear to have risk factors for specific spinal pathologies that correlate with the loading and repetition demands of specific activities. For example, elite athletes who participate in longer and more intense training have higher incidence rates of degenerative disk disease and spondylolysis than athletes who do not. However, data suggest that the recreational athlete may be protected from lumbar injury with physical conditioning. Treatment of athletes with acute or chronic back pain usually is nonsurgical, and symptoms generally are self-limited. However, a systematic approach to the athlete with back pain, involving a thorough history and physical examination, pertinent imaging, and treatment algorithms designed for specific diagnoses, can facilitate symptomatic improvement and return to play. There are no reliable studies examining the long-term consequences of athletic activity on the lumbar spine.     

Neuropathic pain in children

The International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) defines neuropathic pain as being caused by a lesion or dysfunction of the nervous system. Characteristics that would define neuropathic pain and differentiate it from other types of pain include: pain and sensory symptoms that persist beyond the healing period; presence, in variable degree, of neurological sensory signs manifesting as negative and positive sensory phenomena; presence, in variable degree, of other neurological signs, including motor, manifesting as negative and positive motor phenomena or autonomic signs. Many of the conditions causing neuropathic pain in adults are rare in children, but some forms of neuropathic pain do affect children and adolescents as complex regional pain syndrome or phantom limb pain. Treatment strategies that have demonstrated to be efficacious in adults have been extrapolated to be used in children, including medications, nerve blocks, physical therapy, and behavioral medicine. A multidisciplinary program that combines all of these approaches provides the best chance of relief.     

Low-back pain in athletes

While most occurrences of low-back pain in athletes are self-limited sprains or strains, persistent, chronic, or recurrent symptoms are frequently associated with degenerative lumbar disc disease or spondylolytic stress lesions. The prevalence of radiographic evidence of disc degeneration is higher in athletes than it is in nonathletes; however, it remains unclear whether this correlates with a higher rate of back pain. Although there is little peer-reviewed clinical information on the subject, it is possible that chronic pain from degenerative disc disease that is recalcitrant after intensive and continuous nonoperative care can be successfully treated with interbody fusion in selected athletes. In general, the prevalence of spondylolysis is not higher in athletes than it is in nonathletes, although participation in sports involving repetitive hyperextension maneuvers, such as gymnastics, wrestling, and diving, appears to be associated with disproportionately higher rates of spondylolysis. Nonoperative treatment of spondylolysis results in successful pain relief in approximately 80% of athletes, independent of radiographic evidence of defect healing. In recalcitrant cases, direct surgical repair of the pars interarticularis with internal fixation and bone-grafting can yield high rates of pain relief in competitive athletes and allow a high percentage to return to play. Sacral stress fractures occur almost exclusively in individuals participating in high-level running sports, such as track or marathon. Treatment includes a brief period of limited weight-bearing followed by progressive mobilization, physical therapy, and return to sports in one to two months, when the pain has resolved.