Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus compared with cyclosporine microemulsion in primary simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation: 1-year results of a large multicenter trial

BACKGROUND: Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPK) transplantation has become an accepted therapy for type 1 diabetic patients with end-stage renal disease. This open-label, multicenter study compared the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus with the microemulsion (ME) formulation of cyclosporine in a clinical setting. The 1-year results are reported here. METHODS: The study was conducted in 10 European centers and one center in Israel. One hundred three patients were randomly assigned to tacrolimus and 102 to cyclosporine-ME. All patients received concomitant rabbit anti-T-cell globulin induction therapy, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and short-term cortico-steroids. The initial daily oral doses were 0.2 mg/kg for tacrolimus, 7 mg/kg for cyclosporine-ME, and 2 to 3 g for MMF. RESULTS: The 1-year incidence of biopsy-proven kidney or pancreas acute rejection was lower with tacrolimus (27.2%) than with cyclosporine-ME (38.2%; P = 0.09). Pancreas graft survival at 1 year was 91.3% with tacrolimus and 74.5% with cyclosporine-ME (P <0.0005). Renal graft survival was similar in the two study groups. There were no significant treatment-related differences in pancreatic or renal graft function. In total, 34 patients switched treatment from cyclosporine-ME to tacrolimus, but only 6 patients receiving tacrolimus required alternative therapy. Mean doses of MMF at 1 year were also lower in the tacrolimus group (1.36 vs. 1.67 g/day; P = 0.007). CONCLUSION: These findings support the use of tacrolimus therapy for uremic patients with type 1 diabetes who are undergoing SPK transplantation.     

Pharmacokinetic profiling of cyclosporine microemulsion during the first 3 weeks after simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation

The optimal effect of therapy with cyclosporine (CsA) seeks to minimize undesirable side effects while maximizing immunosuppression. This balance, depends on CsA exposure, which may be characterized by the area under the concentration-time-curve (AUC). Therefore, we tested the pharmacokinetic profile of microemulsion CsA as a superior approach to guide clinical immunosuppression after de novo simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantations. We examined 10 consecutive pancreas-kidney recipients with type 1 diabetes and end-stage renal disease. All patients were treated with a regimen consisting of CsA, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and prednisone. Full (9-point) pharmacokinetic studies (C0, C1, C2, C3, C4, C6, C8, C10, C12) were performed on week 1 and during week 3 to examine CsA pharmacokinetic profiles. Mean AUC0-12 of 4431 +/- 2400 microg x h/L at week 1 remained stable at week 3 (5119 +/- 1190 microg x h/L). The C6 sampling time displayed the best correlation with AUC0-12 (r2 = 0.881), followed by C3 (r2 = 0.758). Our preliminary data after simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation support the hypothesis that C3 or C6 sampling is a more accurate predictor of the AUC0-12 than C0. The combination of two samplings, namely C3 + C6 (r2 = 0.938) or C2 + C6 (r2 = 0.955) proved excellent prediction of exposure after simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation.     

Corticosteroid withdrawal in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation: a 3-year report

Corticosteroids are an important element of immunosuppressive protocols, but their long-term use has detrimental effects on patient health, requiring eventual discontinuation. Herein, we present an evaluation of the safety and feasibility of corticosteroid withdrawal based on the findings of the Euro-SPK001 study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this prospective, multicenter study, 205 simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplant recipients were randomized to immunosuppressive treatment with either tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (n = 103) or cyclosporine microemulsion (CsA-ME) and MMF (n = 102). All patients received concomitant rATG induction therapy, MMF, and short-term corticosteroids. RESULTS: Corticosteroid withdrawal was successful in the majority of in-study patients: 66% tacrolimus and 73% cyclosporin-ME. In-study patients selected for corticosteroid withdrawal experienced fewer pancreatic or kidney graft losses and fewer episodes of acute rejection compared with out-of-study patients or those continuing corticosteroid therapy. Acute rejection episodes occurred after corticosteroid withdrawal in two patients who had a previous rejection and in five patients who were rejection free before corticosteroid withdrawal. No rejection episodes were associated with graft loss or immediate serious consequences. Overall, corticosteroid withdrawal was achieved with an increase in both MMF and tacrolimus dosage. CONCLUSION: Corticosteroid withdrawal was successful in the majority of in-study patients. A long-term survey of corticosteroid withdrawal in SPK transplantation with multifactorial analyses is necessary to confirm these early results and to evaluate possible positive effects on glucose metabolism and hypertension.     

Five-year follow-up of a trial comparing Tacrolimus and cyclosporine microemulsion in liver transplantation

We evaluate 5-year results of a prospective randomized trial that compared cyclosporine microemulsion (CsA-me) and Tacrolimus (Tac) for primary immunosuppression. One hundred one adult patients undergoing liver transplantation were randomized to receive Tac (n = 50) or CsA-me (n = 51). The most frequent indication for the procedure was cirrhosis due to virus C followed by alcoholism. Survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 86%, 75%, and 72%, respectively; there was no significant difference between CsA-me versus Tac arms. Acute rejection occurred in 30 cases (30%), independent of the type of primary immunosuppression. Serious adverse events were reported significantly more among patients under CsA-me (48 episodes) than under Tac (32 episodes). Nineteen patients were switched to the other calcineurin inhibitor. The switch was much more frequent from CsA-me to Tac (n = 15; 29.4%), mainly because of lack of efficacy (n = 10; 19.6%). There were no cases of chronic rejections in the Tac arm. Four patients were switched from Tac to CsA-me for side effects; only 1 remains alive, after treatment was changed from CsA-me to an antimetabolite. There were no statistical differences in renal dysfunction, diabetes, hypertension, neurologic disorders, new-onset malignancies, or infections. There were no differences in survival or rejection among the intention-to-treat groups. Serious adverse events, total patients with switch of calcineurin inhibitor, as well as switches due to lack of efficacy, were statistically more frequent under CsA-me. Tacrolimus seems to be a more appropriate drug to be used for primary immunosuppression in liver transplantation.     

Excellent short-term results with steroid-free maintenance immunosuppression in low-risk simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation

HYPOTHESIS: Steroid avoidance is possible in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation with the use of newer immunosuppressive agents and induction therapy. DESIGN: A retrospective consecutive case review. SETTING: A university tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Medical records of 40 consecutive patients who underwent pancreas-kidney transplantation from November 2000 to July 2002 were reviewed. INTERVENTION: The immunosuppression protocol used in this series of patients consisted of Thymoglobulin induction combined with mycophenolate mofetil, tacrolimus, and sirolimus for maintenance immunosuppression. Steroids were used as pretreatment only, given with Thymoglobulin, and were typically discontinued by postoperative week 1. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Graft and patient survival rates, rejection rates of the kidney or pancreas, infection rates, and surgical complication rates. RESULTS: Patient, kidney, and pancreas survival rates were 95.0%, 92.5%, and 87.5%, respectively. Biopsy-proven pancreas rejection rates at 1 and 3 months' posttransplantation were 2.5%. Kidney rejection rates at 1 and 3 months were 2.5%. Steroids were given only to patients with documented transplant rejection. Surgical and medical complications were no different from earlier protocols. CONCLUSIONS: Immunosuppression protocols that do not include maintenance steroids have shown minimal rejection in the first 3 months and equivalent patient and graft survival rates compared with protocols that use steroids. The potential beneficial long-term impact of steroid avoidance will require further study.     

Experience with simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation.

With refinements in surgical techniques and increased clinical experience, there has been a resurgence of interest in vascularized pancreas transplantation. From December 1986 to April 1988, 30 whole-organ vascularized pancreas transplants with pancreatico duodenocystostomy were performed simultaneously with renal transplantation. The recipient population consisted of 20 men and ten women, with a mean age of 34.7 years (range of 25-53 years). The mean duration of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) was 22.6 years (range of 10-37 years). The mean pancreas preservation time was 8.7 hours (range 3-19 years). All patients were immediately insulin-independent. Simultaneous pancreas-kidney engraftment was performed to both iliac fossae via a lower midline incision (n = 28) or through a bilateral lower abdominal incision (n = 2). The mean operating time was 5.9 hours, and packed cell transfusion requirement was 1.3 units. The mean length of hospital stay was 27.4 days. Recipients averaged 2.3 admissions (1-7), with ten patients (34.4%) requiring only one hospital admission. Postoperative immunosuppression consisted of cyclosporine, prednisone, azathioprine, and Minnesota antilymphoblast globulin (MALG). A total of 49 episodes of rejection occurred in 26 patients. Actuarial patient survival rate at two years is 96.3%. The kidney and pancreas survival rates for the same time interval is 94.0% and 84.0%, respectively. Mean serum creatinine at present is 1.75 mg/dl. In conclusion, renal transplantation in concert with pancreas transplantation has a dramatic positive impact on pancreas allograft survival. Combined engraftment does not appear to jeopardize renal allograft functional survival. In view of these results, simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation appears to be the treatment of choice for Type I diabetic patients.     

胰肾联合移植的排斥反应

目的　探讨胰肾联合移植术后的排斥反应。方法　对我院施行的 3例胰肾联合移植的病人 ,采用FK5 0 6 MMF Perid Zenapax四联免疫治疗方案 ,通过床边彩超及Cr、BUN、血糖等来监测移植物的排斥反应。对排斥反应采用激素冲击疗法 ,对激素不敏感者采用OKT3治疗。结果　3例患者中有 2例出现排斥反应 ,其发生率达 6 6 % ;在出现排斥反应时 ,首先表现为低热、全身不适 ,尿量减少 ,血Cr、BUN升高 ,彩超示移植物血流阻抗升高 ,之后才是血糖升高。结论　胰肾联合移植中 ,排斥反应与多种因素有关 ,移植肾对移植胰具有保护作用 ,肾脏可以作为监测胰腺排异的窗口 ,彩超检查可以作为筛选移植物排异反应的手段。     

Complication rate of pancreas retransplantation after simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation compared with pancreas after kidney transplantation

Simultaneous pancreas kidney transplantation is currently the state of the art therapy for patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus and diabetic nephropathy. Up to 30% of patients loose the pancreas with a kidney graft that continues to function. Under those conditions, isolated pancreas retransplantation can be indicated. We compared the outcome of these patients with the outcome of patients undergoing primary pancreas after kidney transplantation. From 1998 to 2005, we performed 205 pancreas transplantations. Three patients were considered for isolated pancreas retransplantation; to date, two have received a new organ. One was retransplanted twice. In two cases, the reasons for the initial graft loss in the retransplantation group were pancreatitis with hemorrhagic bleeding and in the third case severe rejection. After retransplantation two of three patients lost their graft owing to bleeding and venous thrombosis. One of three organs was successfully transplanted and the patient does not require insulin. During the same time, three pancreas after kidney transplantations were performed; all are doing well und are free of insulin. The study despite the small number of cases shows a high complication rate after pancreas retransplantation. Nevertheless, pancreatic retransplantation should be considered in selected patients.     

Greater early pancreas graft loss in women compared with men after simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND: Gender differences in graft survival has been reported after some types of organ transplantation, but not after pancreas transplantation. This study compares graft survival between women and men after simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPK). METHODS: All first time SPK (n = 163) transplants (109 M/54 F) performed between 1989 and 2000 at University of Nebraska Medical Center, where data was available, were analyzed for overall graft and patient survival. Graft failure was then subdivided into early (<6 months), and late (>6 months), and compared between women and men. RESULTS: The 5-yr pancreas and kidney graft survival rates for all SPK recipients was 86% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 81-92%] and 87% (95% CI = 82-93%), respectively. While overall pancreas graft survival in women was similar to men (p = 0.16), early pancreas graft failure was greater in women than men (p = 0.010) with no one cause for failure predominant. There was no gender difference in late pancreas graft failure or in early, or late kidney graft failure in the same recipients. The gender difference was unexplained by differences in age, immunosuppression, body mass index (BMI), or diabetes duration between women and men. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report of a gender difference in pancreas graft survival after SPK with greater early (<6 months) pancreas graft failure in women than men. With no gender difference in kidney graft failure in the same individuals, gender differences in immune responses are unlikely to be the cause. Multiple variables likely contribute.     

Single center results of simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation in patients with type 2 diabetes

Studies have found similar outcomes of Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney transplantation (SPKT) in patients with Type 2 (T2D) and Type 1 diabetes (T1D). However, there are scarce data evaluating the association of recipient factors such as age, BMI, or pretransplant insulin requirements with outcomes, thus the criteria for the optimal recipient selection remains unclear. In this study, 284 T1D and 39 T2D patients, who underwent SPKT between 2006 and 2017 with 1 year of follow-up at minimum, were assessed for potential relationship of pretransplant BMI and insulin requirements with posttransplant diabetes and pancreatic graft failure. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed similar rates of freedom from posttransplant diabetes (94.7% T2D vs. 92.3% T1D at 1 yr, and 88.1% T2D vs. 81.1% T1D at 5 yrs) and graft survival (89.7% T2D vs. 90.4% T1D at 1 yr, and 89.7% T2D vs. 81.2% T1D at 5 yrs). There was no significant association between BMI or pretransplant insulin requirements with posttransplant diabetes occurrence in either T1D (p = .10, .43, respectively) or T2D (p = .12, .63) patients in the cohort; or with graft failure (T1D: p = .40, .09; T2D: p = .71, .28). These observations suggest a less restricted approach to selective use of SPKT in patients with T2D.     

Cytomegalovirus infection in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation

INTRODUCTION: In this open-label multicenter study, 205 simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplant recipients between 1998 and 2000 were randomly assigned to tacrolimus or cyclosporine-microemulsion (ME). All patients received concomitant rATG induction therapy, mycophenolate mofetil and short-term corticosteroids. We report the 3-year data related to the occurrence, severity and effect of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections. The type of CMV prophylaxis and treatment was at the discretion of the investigator. RESULTS: The overall incidence of CMV infection was 34% with no difference in incidence between the tacrolimus and cyclosporine-ME treatment arms. Statistically significant fewer CMV infections occurred among patients who received ganciclovir (22%) than those who did not receive prophylaxis (42%; P = .0075) or were treated with acyclovir (43%; P = .0066). The CMV infection rate according to donor recipient CMV serological status was: D-/R- group 11%, which was lower than the D-/R+ group at 40% (P = .0035), the D+/R+ group at 37% (P = .0024), or the D+/R- group at 52% (P = .00001). Among the last three groups, the infection rate was lower in patients on ganciclovir than those with no prophylaxis or on acyclovir (22% vs 64%; P = .00001). The incidence of acute rejection episodes was higher among patients without ganciclovir prophylaxis. No difference was observed in actuarial patient, kidney, or pancreas survival rates between patients with versus without infection. CONCLUSIONS: Ganciclovir prophylaxis effectively prevented CMV infection in SPK transplant recipients, especially in higher risk groups. An effect of CMV prophylaxis on the incidence of rejection is possible.     

肠道-腔静脉引流的胰肾联合移植术

目的 探讨肠道-下腔静脉引流的胰肾联合移植术的手术操作及临床效果.方法 对3例慢性肾衰竭合并2型糖尿病患者施行肠道-腔静脉引流的胰肾联合移植术,3例均为首次移植,年龄52、58、58岁.每日胰岛素用量20～55 U.供体切取均采用多器官联合切取.热缺血时间8～12 min,供体修整均采用肝总动脉与胃十二指肠动脉端-端吻合以重建十二指肠动脉弓,利用供体髂总静脉延长供体门静脉,切除供体脾脏.以供体髂内动脉与供肾动脉端-端吻合备用.受者手术采用右下腹经腹直肌切口,游离腔静脉下段及右侧髂外动静脉,取动脉延长之供肾,将供肾静脉与受者髂外静脉行端-侧吻合,将供体髂总动脉与受者髂外动脉行端-侧吻合,供体髂外动脉(残端修整成斜面)以动脉夹暂时夹闭备用,十字切开侧腹膜,将供肾埋入,输尿管经腹膜外隧道牵至膀胱底行膀胱输尿管吻合术,胰腺移植采用供体门静脉与受者下腔静脉行端-侧吻合,腹腔干-肠系膜上动脉之腹主动脉袖片与供体髂外动脉残端吻合,开放血流后行供体十二指肠与受体小肠侧侧吻合并关闭十二指肠残端.术后保留胃肠减压,待患者胃肠道功能恢复后拔除.每4 h测血糖、每6 h测血清及胰周引流液淀粉酶1次,每日超声监测胰腺及肾脏血流,生长抑素0.1 mg皮下注射8 h 1次,2周后停用.免疫诱导采用抗胸腺细胞免疫球蛋白减激素方案.结果 3例患者手术过程顺利,手术时间分别为7.5、8.0及10.0 h,术中失血量300～500 ml,仅1例术中输注浓缩红细胞2 U.术后1～3 d内完全停用胰岛素.术后3～7 d内移植肾功能恢复正常.实验室检查SCr分别为86、98及112μmol/L.1例术后10 d出现消化道出血,考虑为肠道吻合口出血;停用抗凝药.给予止血药及输血6 U治疗后1 d出血停止.3例随访2～6个月,无排斥反应发生,空腹及餐后血糖正常.结论 利用供体髂动脉搭桥的方法进行的胰肾同侧联合移植术手术操作简单,创伤较小而且仪使用一侧髂血管,对于左侧髂动脉硬化严重的患者仍可施行该术式.因而扩大了受者的范围;为患者保留一侧髂血管,为今后再次肾移植创造了条件.同时腔静脉引流的胰肾联合移植术使供体门静脉与脾静脉的夹角更符合生理角度,可能减少脾静脉血栓形成的发生率.     

胰肾联合移植的外科技术探讨

目的 探讨胰液空肠引流式胰肾联合移植的外科技巧和临床应用.方法 中山大学附属第一医院2005年1月-2009年6月共施行了10例胰肾同期联合移植术(SPK),供体胰、十二指肠和肾均采用腹部多器官联合切取方式获得,经腹主动脉、肠系膜上静脉对胰腺及十二指肠同时快速灌注降温.移植胰的外分泌采用胰十二指肠一空肠内引流吻合方式.术后早期均以抗CD25单克隆抗体进行免疫诱导治疗,采用他克莫司、霉酚酸酯及皮质激素预防排斥反应.结果 10例移植手术均获得成功.供体胰十二指肠和肾的热缺血时间为(5.9±2.6)min;移植肾平均冷缺血时间为(5.2±2.2)h,移植胰平均冷缺血时间为(9.3±3.6)h.术后3例出现移植胰伤口感染,经治疗后3～12周愈合.2例出现胰十二指肠一空肠吻合口出血,均经保守治疗止血而治愈.未发生与胰液引流相关的外科并发症.1年内3例发生了急性排斥反应,2例经激素冲击和抗淋巴细胞球蛋白治疗而被逆转;1例顽固性急排患者术后39 d在持续肾脏替代治疗过程中并发脑血管意外死亡.其余9例均痊愈,随访6～12个月,完全停用胰岛素.结论 获取质量良好的供体器官及合理血管整形,是保证胰肾联合移植成功的前提;改进的胰液空肠外分泌引流术式的方法是可靠的.     

Experience with steroid-free maintenance immunosuppression in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation

INTRODUCTION: Steroid avoidance is possible in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation with the use of newer immunosuppressive agents and induction therapy. We undertook a retrospective consecutive case review of patients treated at a university tertiary referral center. METHODS: Medical records of 44 consecutive patients receiving a pancreas-kidney transplant from November 2000 to September 2002 were reviewed. The immunosuppression protocol used in this series of patients consisted of thymoglobulin induction, combined with mycophenolate mofetil, tacrolimus, and sirolimus for maintenance immunosuppression. Steroids were used only while thymoglobulin was given and were typically discontinued by postoperative week 1. Main outcome measures included graft and patient survival rates, rejection rates of the kidney or pancreas, infection rates, and surgical complication rates. RESULTS: All 44 patients received a kidney-pancreas transplant with systemic venous anastomosis and enteric drainage of the pancreas. Patient kidney, and pancreas survival rates were 95.6%, 93.2%, and 88.7%, respectively. Biopsy-proven pancreas rejection rates at 1 and 6 months posttransplant were 2.3% and 2.3%. Kidney rejection rates at 1 and 6 months were 2.3% and 4.6%. Reasons for patient loss included one death from sepsis and one cardiovascular death. Reasons for kidney loss besides death included a thrombotic microangiopathy. Reasons for pancreas loss included three thromboses, one mild rejection/infection, and one duodenal segment leak with infection. All patients who have been free of rejection have been off steroids for the duration of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Newer immunosuppression protocols without maintenance steroids are possible with minimal rejection in the first 3 months and equivalent patient and graft survival rates compared with earlier protocols utilizing steroids. The potential beneficial long-term impact of steroid avoidance will require further study.     

Tacrolimus in induction immunosuppressive treatment in renal transplantation: comparison with cyclosporine

The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy and safety of induction immunosuppression therapies based on tacrolimus or cyclosporine (CsA) in kidney transplantation. The 240 kidney allograft recipients were divided into two groups: group 1 (n=94) received tacrolimus (.01 mg/kg per day), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF, 2 g/d), and steroids (30 mg/d); and group 2 (n=146) CsA (6 mg/kg per day), MMF (2 g/d), and steroids (30 mg/d). Antilymphocyte serum was administered in cases of acute tubular necrosis. The acute rejection rate was higher among group 2 (30.6%) compared with group 1 patients (12.2%) (P=.001). There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of age, gender, body surface area, serologic virus markers (in donor and recipient), baseline creatinine levels, cause of death, HLA incompatibilities, response to acute tubular necrosis, and number of dialysis sessions. We conclude that both immunosuppressive regimens are effective and safe in kidney transplantation. The survival rates of patients and grafts were similar, but the incidence and degree of acute rejection events were reduced in group 1; this finding may forecast a decreased incidence of chronic renal allograft nephropathy.     

Initial Australasian experience with portal-enteric drainage in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation

Background: Pancreas–kidney transplantation is currently the most effective method to re‐establish euglycaemia in insulin‐dependent diabetics with associated renal failure. The standard technique employed has been bladder drainage of exocrine secretions coupled with systemic venous drainage (‘systemic‐bladder’ (SB) drainage). The more physiological technique, enteric exocrine with portal venous drainage (‘portal‐enteric’ (PE) drainage), has been utilized sparingly in the past as a result of fears of technical complications. This paper compares the Monash Medical Centre experience with both techniques. Methods: A total of 68 simultaneous pancreas–kidney transplantations were performed at Monash Medical Centre from 1991 until 2004. The first 37 received SB drainage. Since March 2001, 27 have received PE drainage. This retrospective study compared the SB group (n= 37) with the PE group (n= 27), with a 2‐year follow‐up, examining a number of surgical outcomes. Results: Two‐year patient (94.3 versus 96.0%), kidney (89.2 versus 85.2%), pancreas (77.9 versus 71.4%) and event‐free (73.0 versus 67.7%) survivals were all similar between the SB and PE groups, respectively. Although surgery took longer in PE subjects (4 h : 47 min ± 0:48 versus 5 h : 16 min ± 1:00; P= 0.045), less intraoperative transfusions were required (1.3 ± 1.43 versus 0.52 ± 0.90; P= 0.024). Length of hospital stay and time to insulin independence were similar. Pancreas graft thrombosis rates were similar (10.8% SB versus 7.4% PE, P= 0.497). Conclusions: PE drainage is a safe and viable method for pancreas transplantation, which can be performed with excellent outcomes. An increased rate of complications with PE drainage has not been demonstrated in this series.     

Pancreas-after-kidney transplantation: an increasingly attractive alternative to simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND: Historically, the clinical acceptability of pancreas-after-kidney (PAK) transplantation has been hampered by relatively high acute rejection rates and lower pancreas graft survival rates when compared with the more commonly performed simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplantation. The purpose of this study was to compare PAK transplantation to SPK transplantation in the Thymoglobulin induction era. METHODS: The authors reviewed all bladder-drained PAK (n=47) transplants receiving rabbit antithymocyte globulin induction from June 1998 to June 2002 and compared them with SPK (n=25) transplants during the same time period at their institution. The authors retrospectively studied data on demographics, patient survival, graft (pancreas and kidney) survival, complications, and biopsy-proven rejection episodes. RESULTS: The actuarial 1-year patient survival was 93% for the PAK group versus 100% for the SPK group (P =not significant [NS]). The actuarial 1-year pancreas graft survival was 87% for the PAK group versus 92% for the SPK group (P =NS). Waiting time for PAK was significantly shorter than for SPK (6.3 +/- 5.2 vs. 16.2 + -13.7 months, P <0.05). Clinical acute rejection rates were similar in the two groups (4.3% for PAK vs. 4.0% for SPK). PAK recipients demonstrated a greater decline in renal function after transplantation compared with SPK. A multivariate analysis failed to elucidate the cause. CONCLUSIONS: Newer immunosuppressive regimens allow PAK transplant patients to achieve immunologic outcomes similar to SPK transplant patients. Although the shorter waiting time and the ability to use living-donor kidneys make PAK an increasingly attractive alternative to SPK transplantation, its effect on renal allograft function deserves further attention.