Pulmonary rehabilitation

Pulmonary rehabilitation programs use multidisciplinary teams to optimize physical and social functioning of patients with chronic respiratory impairment. These programs provide rehabilitation in inpatient, outpatient, or home settings, using at least three sessions weekly (one may be unsupervised) for at least 6 wk. The programs usually consist of exercise training, education, and psychosocial/behavioral components. Upper extremity exercises and instruction on breathing technique are included in most rehabilitation programs and reduce dyspnea, but the contribution of these to improved functional capacity remains unproven. Decreases in the sensation of dyspnea, increased functional exercise capacity, and enhanced quality of life of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are established benefits of pulmonary rehabilitation. Evidence is lacking for the efficacy of rehabilitation for patients with non-COPD causes of pulmonary impairment, but many of these patients probably benefit. Despite the availability of strong evidence to support the efficacy of pulmonary rehabilitation programs in patients with severe COPD, third-party reimbursement policies have been inconsistent. Nonetheless, enrollment in a pulmonary rehabilitation program is encouraged for all appropriate candidates with chronic respiratory impairment, particularly for those with severe COPD.     

Short- and long-term effects of outpatient rehabilitation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomized trial

PURPOSE: Pulmonary rehabilitation programs are effective in patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in the short term, but their long-term effects are not known. We investigated the short- and long-term effects of a 6-month outpatient rehabilitation program in patients with severe COPD. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: One hundred patients were randomly assigned to receive either an exercise training program that included cycling, walking, and strength training (n = 50) or usual medical care (n = 50). Thirty-four patients in the training group were evaluated after 6 months (end of training), and 26 were evaluated after 18 months of follow-up. In the control group, 28 patients were evaluated at 6 months and 23 after 18 months. We measured pulmonary function, 6-minute walking distance, maximal exercise capacity, peripheral and respiratory muscle strength, and quality of life (on a 20 to 140-point scale), and estimated the cost-effectiveness of the program. RESULTS: At 6 months, the training group showed improvement in 6-minute walking distance [mean difference (training - control) of 52 m; 95% confidence interval (CI), 15 to 89 m], maximal work load (12 W; 95% CI, 6 to 19 W), maximal oxygen uptake (0.26 liters/min; 95% CI, 0.07 to 0.45 liters/min), quadriceps force (18 Nm; 95% CI, 7 to 29 Nm), inspiratory muscle force (11 cm H(2)O; 95% CI, 3 to 20 cm H(2)O), and quality of life (14 points; 95% CI, 6 to 21 points; all P <0.05). At 18 months all these differences persisted (P <0.05), except for inspiratory muscle strength. For 6-minute walking distance and quality of life, the differences between the training group and controls at 18 months exceeded the minimal clinically-important difference. CONCLUSION: Among patients who completed the 6-month program, outpatient training resulted in significant and clinically relevant changes in 6-minute walking distance, maximal exercise performance, peripheral and respiratory muscle strength, and quality of life. Most of these effects persisted 18 months after starting the program.     

Are patients with COPD more active after pulmonary rehabilitation?

BACKGROUND: Despite a variety of benefits brought by pulmonary rehabilitation to patients with COPD, it is unclear whether these patients are more active during daily life after the program. METHODS: Physical activities in daily life (activity monitoring), pulmonary function (spirometry), exercise capacity (incremental cycle-ergometer testing and 6-min walk distance testing), muscle force (quadriceps and handgrip force, and inspiratory and expiratory maximal pressures), quality of life (chronic respiratory disease questionnaire), and functional status (pulmonary functional status and dyspnea questionnaire-modified version) were assessed at baseline, after 3 months of a multidisciplinary rehabilitation program, and at the end of a 6-month multidisciplinary rehabilitation program in 29 patients (mean [+/- SD] age, 67 +/- 8 years; FEV(1), 46 +/- 16% predicted). RESULTS: Exercise capacity, muscle force, quality of life, and functional status improved significantly after 3 months of pulmonary rehabilitation (all p < 0.05), with further improvements in muscle force, functional status, and quality of life at 6 months. Movement intensity during walking improved significantly after 3 months (p = 0.046) with further improvements after 6 months (p = 0.0002). Walking time in daily life did not improve significantly at 3 months (mean improvement, 7 +/- 35%; p = 0.21), but only after 6 months (mean improvement, 20 +/- 36%; p = 0.008). No significant changes occurred in other activities or in the pattern of the time spent walking in daily life. Changes in dyspnea after the program were significantly related to changes in walking time in daily life (r = 0.43; p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: If one aims at changing physical activity habits in the daily life of COPD patients, the contribution of long-lasting programs might be important.     

Rehabilitation in COPD: the long-term effect of a supervised 7-week program succeeded by a self-monitored walking program

Pulmonary rehabilitation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) improves exercise tolerance and health status, however, these effects have been shown to decline after termination of the rehabilitation program. This study has examined the long-term effect of a 7-week supervised rehabilitation program combined with daily self-monitored training at home on exercise tolerance and health status. Two hundred and nine consecutive COPD patients who had completed a 7-week pulmonary rehabilitation program were assessed with endurance shuttle walk test (ESWT) and the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) at baseline, 0, 3, and 12 months after the program. Sixty-eight (32.5%) patients did not attend the 1-year follow-up. Among the 141 patients who competed the 1-year evaluation, the initial improvement after the 7-week program in the ESWT time was 180 s or 101% (p = 0.001) and in SGRQ 3.4 units (p = 0.001). These effects were maintained at the 1-year evaluation (ESWT 59% above baseline; p < 0.001 and improved SGRQ 3.0 units compared with baseline; p = 0.011). The 31 patients who attended the 6-month, but not the 12-month evaluation, improved ESWT time by 96 s (p = 0.02) without any change in SGRQ +2.0 (p = 0.40). A relative simple and inexpensive 7-week supervised rehabilitation program combined with daily self-monitored training at home was able to maintain significant improvement in exercise tolerance and health status throughout 1 year. Death and hospital admissions due to acute exacerbations were the main reasons for non-attendance in the follow-up period.     

Inpatient pulmonary rehabilitation: does it make sense?

Among the nonpharmacological therapies, pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is particularly appropriate for patients with chronic respiratory impairment who, despite any optimal drug management, are still symptomatic and experience restriction in every day activities. Pulmonary rehabilitation performed in inpatient, outpatient, or home settings demonstrates short- and long-term clinical efficacy. Although disease severity does not inherently dictate candidacy for exercise training, the degree of physiological and functional impairment may influence setting in which the training should occur. Therefore, inpatient rehabilitation is generally best-suited for the most sick and most disabled patients. The overall results from the literature confirm that the inpatient setting for a PR program is a feasible option and does not necessarily result in higher direct costs when balanced against duration and effectiveness in terms of improved outcomes.     

Regular walking and long-term maintenance of outcomes after pulmonary rehabilitation

BACKGROUND: Empirical evidence supports the role of exercise as part of pulmonary rehabilitation in improving symptoms of breathlessness (dyspnea), health-related quality of life, and exercise tolerance among patients with chronic lung disease. However, many studies show that these initial benefits tend to diminish 12 to 18 months after rehabilitation. Given the importance of exercise (ie, walking) during rehabilitation, we examined whether patient adherence to regular walking enhanced the long-term maintenance of functional benefits gained from an 8-week pulmonary rehabilitation program. METHODS: One hundred twenty-three patients with moderate to severe chronic lung disease completed an 8-week pulmonary rehabilitation program and participated in a 12-month maintenance intervention trial. Measures of weekly walking, lung function, self-efficacy for walking, dyspnea during activities of daily living, exercise capacity (6-minute walk test, 6MW), perceived breathlessness after the 6MW, and health-related quality of life were obtained at postrehabilitation, and at 6, 12, and 24 months after completing pulmonary rehabilitation. Regular walkers were defined as those active on most days or every single day of the week on the average throughout the 24-month period, whereas irregular walkers walked on some days, rarely, or not at all. RESULTS: The effects of the maintenance program on average frequency of walking were nonsignificant, with 44% of the maintenance patients and 38% of the standard care patients classified as regular walkers. There were no significant differences between walking groups on gender, healthcare utilization over the 24-month follow-up period, and postrehabilitation measures of lung function, 6MW distance, perceived breathlessness after 6MW, health-related quality of life, dyspnea, or age. Repeated measures analyses of variance using a 2 x 4 mixed model approach were applied to examine group differences and changes in outcomes over time. Overall, participants decreased in 6MW distance (P <.001), reported increases in perceived breathlessness after the 6MW (P <.05), and decreased in overall health-related quality of life (P <.001) from postrehabilitation to 24 months. Regular walkers reported significantly better health-related quality of life (P <.05) as compared to irregular walkers, averaging across time points. Irregular walkers declined significantly more than regular walkers on measures of shortness of breath during activities of daily living (P <.01) and walking self-efficacy (P <.001) from postrehabilitation to 24 months. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that participation in regular exercise such as walking after completing pulmonary rehabilitation is associated with slower declines in overall health-related quality of life and walking self-efficacy as well as less progression of dyspnea during activities of daily living. Regular exercise after rehabilitation may be protective against increases in dyspnea symptoms and perceived limitations in walking which are both characteristic of progressing chronic lung disease.     

An evaluation of two approaches to exercise conditioning in pulmonary rehabilitation

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To compare the effectiveness of two forms of exercise training in pulmonary rehabilitation. DESIGN: A prospective, randomized, unblinded, 8-week trial. SETTING: A hospital-based outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation program. PATIENTS: Forty patients (20 patients in each group) with COPD who were referred for pulmonary rehabilitation. INTERVENTIONS: We compared the short-term effectiveness of a high-intensity, lower-extremity endurance program with a low-intensity, multicomponent calisthenics program for the rehabilitation of patients with COPD. The high-intensity group trained predominately on the stationary bicycle and treadmill, with a goal of exercising at > or = 80% of maximal level determined from incremental testing for 30 min per session. The low-intensity group performed predominately classroom exercises for approximately 30 min per session. For both groups, twice-weekly sessions were held for 8 weeks. The primary outcome measure was health status, measured using the Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire. Other outcomes included peak oxygen consumption on incremental treadmill exercise testing, exertional dyspnea, treadmill endurance time, the number of sit-to-stand repetitions and arm lifts in 1 min, overall dyspnea, and questionnaire-rated functional status. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Both groups showed significant postrehabilitation improvement in exercise variables, exertional and overall dyspnea, functional performance, and health status. Patients in the high-intensity group showed greater increases in treadmill endurance and greater reductions in exertional dyspnea, whereas those in the low-intensity group showed greater increases in arm-endurance testing. Both groups had similar improvements in overall dyspnea, functional performance, and health status. CONCLUSIONS: Despite differences in exercise performance, both high-intensity, lower-extremity endurance training and low-intensity calisthenics led to similar short-term improvements in questionnaire-rated dyspnea, functional performance, and health status.     

Fatigue in COPD: prevalence and effect on outcomes in pulmonary rehabilitation

Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) complain of dyspnea and fatigue. We sought to estimate the prevalence of high fatigue in this population and to determine whether individuals with high fatigue had a different response to pulmonary rehabilitation. This observational study was embedded within a randomized trial. Participants underwent 3 months of pulmonary rehabilitation including education and exercise training. We divided 251 individuals into low and high fatigue groups using population normal scores of the SF-36 vitality domain. Baseline data included spirometry, 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), peak exercise capacity, constant workrate cycling endurance time, and questionnaires including the St. George's and Chronic Respiratory questionnaires (SGRQ, CRQ). The response to pulmonary rehabilitation was evaluated using changes in these measures at 3 months and 1 year after entry. High fatigue was present in 97/251 (39%) of patients. High fatigue patients were younger, had more depressive symptoms, greater dyspnea and poorer SGRQ scores (p < 0.01). They also had lower 6MWD, endurance times, and peak volume of oxygen consumption (VO(2); p < 0.05). Patients in both groups improved similarly in their dyspnea, the 6MWD and endurance time. High-fatigue patients had greater improvements in both the CRQ fatigue (by 0.74 more points) and the SGRQ scores (by 6.0 points; p < 0.01), with clinically significant gains maintained at 1 year. This study suggests that high levels of fatigue is a common feature in patients with COPD. They have a lower exercise capacity and a lower health status. However, they benefit from pulmonary rehabilitation.     

The functional impact of an individualized, graded, outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation in end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the functional impact of an individualized outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation program in end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). METHODS: Patients with end-stage COPD were admitted into a 6-week comprehensive outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation program that was "packaged" for each patient. We compared spirometric parameters, exercise tolerance, level of breathlessness, and intensity of work before and after rehabilitation. RESULTS: Of 45 eligible patients, only 14 consented to participate in the study. All 14 patients had forced expiratory volume in 1 second <35% of predicted, and 10 patients (72%) had a 6-minute walk test <180 m. The level of breathlessness was between 7 (moderate to severely breathless) and 10 (maximally breathless) on the Visual Analogue Scale in all patients. After the program, there was significant improvement in the FEV 1 P = 0.04), forced vital capacity P = 0.0045), 6-minute walk test P = 0.00047), and shuttle-walk test (9 of 14 patients). All patients had some improvement in level of dyspnea. CONCLUSIONS: Individualized outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation in end-stage COPD can produce a measurable improvement in spirometry and exercise tolerance with a favorable impact on the level of physical activity.     

Long-term benefits of exercise maintenance after outpatient rehabilitation program in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

BACKGROUND: Optimal strategies to maintain short-term benefits of an initial rehabilitation program (RP) are not known. To assess the long-term effects of exercise maintenance (EM) after an initial outpatient RP, the authors conducted a prospective study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-eight patients with moderate to moderately severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease who completed an initial 7-week outpatient RP were included. They were allocated into four groups according to the conditions of EM they self-selected: 15 patients received a structured EM session supervised by a physiotherapist twice a week (group A); 14 patients received a structured EM session supervised by a physiotherapist once a week (group B); 15 patients continued self EM daily at home (group C); and 14 patients did not continue EM (group D). Patients were evaluated before, immediately after, and 18 months after the initial outpatient RP. Measurements included exercise testing on a cycle ergometer and a visual analog scale to evaluate chronic dyspnea. RESULTS: After RP, all patients exhibited improvements in maximal workload (P < 0.05) and in dyspnea (P < 0.05). Improvements in maximal workload were maintained at 18 months in patients in groups A, B, and C but these only reached significance in groups B and C (P < 0.05). On the other hand, maximal workload returned to baseline values in group D (P = 0.01) at 18 months. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate definite benefits of EM after an initial outpatient RP compared with no EM. Daily EM at home appears to be as efficient as structured EM sessions supervised by a physiotherapist, once or twice a week, in moderate to moderately severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.     

Long-term effects of outpatient rehabilitation of COPD: A randomized trial

OBJECTIVE: To examine the short- and long-term effects of an outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation program for COPD patients on dyspnea, exercise, health-related quality of life, and hospitalization rate. SETTING: Secondary-care respiratory clinic in Barcelona. METHODS: We conducted a randomized controlled trial with blinding of outcome assessment and follow-up at 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months. Sixty patients with moderate to severe COPD (age 65 +/- 7 years; FEV(1) 35 +/- 14%) were recruited. Thirty patients randomized to rehabilitation received 3 months of outpatient breathing retraining and chest physiotherapy, 3 months of daily supervised exercise, and 6 months of weekly supervised breathing exercises. Thirty patients randomized to the control group received standard care. RESULTS: We found significant differences between groups in perception of dyspnea (p < 0.0001), in 6-min walking test distance (p < 0.0001), and in day-to-day dyspnea, fatigue, and emotional function measured by the Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire (p < 0. 01). The improvements were evident at the third month and continued with somewhat diminished magnitude in the second year of follow-up. The PR group experienced a significant (p < 0.0001) reduction in exacerbations, but not the number of hospitalizations. The number of patients needed to treat to achieve significant benefit in health-related quality of life for a 2-year period was approximately three. CONCLUSION: Outpatient rehabilitation programs can achieve worthwhile benefits that persist for a period of 2 years.     

Effect of respiratory muscle endurance training in patients with COPD undergoing pulmonary rehabilitation

BACKGROUND: Respiratory muscle endurance training (hyperpnea training) has been shown to have beneficial effects in patients with COPD. STUDY OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine whether hyperpnea training, when added to an endurance exercise training program, would lead to additional benefits compared with endurance training alone in patients with COPD. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Patients with COPD entering an 8-week outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation program. Fifteen patients (mean [+/- SE] FEV1, 45 +/- 6% predicted) were randomized to combined therapy, and 14 patients (mean FEV1, 44 +/- 4% predicted) were randomized to endurance training. METHODS: Peak exercise capacity, exercise endurance time during constant workload cycle exercise, 6-min walk distance, quality of life as measured by the chronic respiratory questionnaire, respiratory muscle strength and endurance, and quadriceps fatigability were measured before and after endurance or combined training. RESULTS: After rehabilitation, peak exercise capacity, exercise endurance time, 6-min walk distance, and quality of life all increased in both groups, but there was no significant difference in the extent of improvement between groups. Mean respiratory muscle endurance increased to a significantly greater extent in the combined therapy group (17.5 +/- 2.7 vs 8.5 +/- 2.5 min, respectively; p = 0.02). Respiratory muscle strength was significantly increased, and quadriceps fatigability was significantly reduced after rehabilitation in the combined therapy group but not in the endurance training group, but the difference between groups did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION: The endurance of the respiratory muscles can be improved by specific training beyond that achieved by endurance training alone in patients with COPD. However, this improvement did not translate into additional improvement in quality of life or exercise performance.     

A study of the long-term continuation rate of respiratory rehabilitation in a day care service]

The purpose of this study is to report on the continuation rate of an outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation service for people with pulmonary disease. In Japan, Kaigo Hoken, the long-term care insurance system for the elderly, went into effect on April 1, 2000. Under this system, a special day care service was established in our hospital in order to continue outpatient rehabilitation for the elderly with pulmonary diseases. In the present study we analyzed the continuation rate of pulmonary rehabilitation in day care for a period of 2 years. Sixty-five stable patients with chronic respiratory failure were enrolled in the program. The continuation rates for 1 year and 2 years were 67.7% and 50.8%. We found that the continuation rate was high even for patients over 75 years old. Twenty patients died during the course of the program. When these 20 cases are excluded, the continuation rates for one year and 2 years become 88.9% and 73.3%. Our day care is the first service of its kind in Japan designed specifically for chronic pulmonary disease patients. It also includes a pick-up service and social activity support. In the future, the use of social resources like our day care service for the elderly with pulmonary diseases may play an important and beneficial role in continuing outpatient rehabilitation.     

Psychological outcomes of an outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation program in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

STUDY/PRINCIPLES: The effects of an outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation program on psychological morbidity (anxiety and depressive symptoms) were examined in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). METHODS: The 26 rehabilitation patients with COPD were compared with 19 control patients with COPD similar in age, gender, COPD severity and other variables. Initial assessment included lung function testing, health status, exercise tolerance, dyspnea intensity and psychiatric interviews using Hamilton depression rating scale (HAM-D) and Hamilton anxiety rating scale (HAM-A). A pulmonary rehabilitation program was carried out during the following 2 months; psychiatric interviews and measurements of health status, exercise tolerance and dyspnea intensity were done again on completion of the study at 2 months. RESULTS: There was a decrease in HAM-A scores in the rehabilitation group and the decrease was statistically significant (P=0.010). On the contrary the HAM-A scores did not change in control group. The decrease in HAM-A scores in rehabilitation group was also statistically significant compared with the control group (P=0.042). There was no significant difference in HAM-D scores within the two groups and also there was no significant difference between the two groups in HAM-D scores. The health status, exercise tolerance and dyspnea intensity improved significantly in the rehabilitation group compared to the control group. CONCLUSION: This study shows that our outpatient rehabilitation program leads to a benefit in anxiety and depressive symptoms in COPD patients. The benefit was especially significant in anxiety symptoms. In addition to the improvement in psychological symptoms, the health status, exercise tolerance and dyspnea intensity were also significantly improved in COPD patients who underwent the rehabilitation program. This outpatient-based rehabilitation program was well accepted by the patients. The relatively simple design of the program makes it feasible independently of expensive equipment.     

The effects of pulmonary rehabilitation with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)]

It is controversial whether pulmonary rehabilitation is effective in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). To test the effect of pulmonary rehabilitation, 7 patients with COPD (aged 76.0 +/- 2.6 years) were enrolled in pulmonary rehabilitation program for 6 weeks. The program consisted of relaxation, pursed lip breathing, diaphragmatic breathing, panic control, muscle stretch gymnastics, and exercise training. The distance of the 6-minute walking test increased significantly from 246.4 +/- 38.0 (m) to 304.3 +/- 28.4 (m) (p < 0.05). The minimum SpO2 during the 6-minute walking test increased from 86.0 +/- 2.8 (%) to 90.1 +/- 1.3 (%) and dyspnea as measured with Borg scale decreased from 5.6 +/- 1.1 to 4.6 +/- 0.5, although they were not significantly different. These results suggest that pulmonary rehabilitation might improve exercise tolerance in elderly patients with COPD.     

The nonpharmacologic treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: advances in our understanding of pulmonary rehabilitation

The optimal care of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease generally requires combining pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic therapies. The latter include smoking cessation, the encouragement of physical activity and exercise, influenza and pneumonia vaccinations, education on adherence to medical therapy, collaborative self-management strategies, such as a plan to manage exacerbations, and advance directives. Although each of these is a component of good medical practice, they can be given together in the form of a comprehensive outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation program. Pulmonary rehabilitation, which includes exercise training, education, psychosocial support, and nutritional intervention, has demonstrated effectiveness over multiple outcome areas, despite the fact that it has virtually no direct effect on the underlying pathophysiology of the lung. This intervention works primarily through its beneficial effects on associated morbidity, such as physical deconditioning. Pulmonary rehabilitation is indicated when respiratory symptoms or functional limitations persist despite otherwise standard medical therapy. Combining optimal bronchodilator therapy and/or supplemental oxygen therapy with exercise training will enhance the effectiveness of the latter.     

An innovative maintenance follow-up program after a first inpatient pulmonary rehabilitation

Although the benefits of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) have been demonstrated in patients with COPD, most studies suggest that short-term programs are insufficient to maintain the benefits beyond a post-discharge period of 6 months to 1 year. We were interested to evaluate the effects of an innovative maintenance intervention compared with a usual after-care. Forty moderate to severe COPD patients, who had just completed their first inpatient PR, were consecutively included in either a maintenance group (MG) or a standard after-care group. The maintenance program was coordinated within a health-care network including self-help associations, and offered weekly activities. We measured the 6-min walk distance (6MWD), the quality of life using the St George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), the dyspnea, the maximal workload and the health-care utilization. Data were collected at respiratory clinic admission and discharge, and at 6- and 12-month visits after the PR. After 12 months, we found statistically and clinically significant differences in favor of the MG in 6MWD (74 m; p < or = 0.01) and in the three domains of SGRQ: symptom (19%; p < or = 0.01), activity (27%; p < or = 0.01) and impact (32%; p < or = 0.01). The results showed no difference between groups in dyspnea and maximal workload. We also found that the number of days spent in hospital for respiratory disorders was significantly lower in the MG after 12 months (p < or = 0.03). The multidisciplinary management of COPD patients in the post-rehabilitation period within a health-care network including self-help associations seems to be an effective strategy for maintaining, and even improving, the benefits of a first initial structured program.     

Noninvasive ventilation during exercise training improves exercise tolerance in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

PURPOSE: In patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pulmonary rehabilitation has been demonstrated to increase exercise capacity and reduce dyspnea. In the most disabled patients, the intensity of exercise during the training sessions is limited by ventilatory pump capacity. This study therefore evaluated the beneficial effect of noninvasive ventilation (NIV) support during the rehabilitation sessions on exercise tolerance. METHODS: This study included 14 patients with stabilized chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, ages 63 +/- 7 years, with a forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) 31.5% +/- 9.2% of predicted value. All 14 patients participated in an outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation program. Seven of the patients trained with NIV during the exercise sessions (NIV group), whereas the remaining seven patients breathed spontaneously (control group). Exercise tolerance was evaluated during an incremental exercise test and during constant work rate exercise at 75% of peak oxygen consumption (VO(2)) before and after the training program. RESULTS: The application of noninvasive ventilation increased exercise tolerance, reduced dyspnea, and prevented exercise-induced oxygen desaturation both before and after training. The pressure support was well tolerated by all the patients during the course of the training program. In the NIV group, training induced a greater improvement in peak VO(2) (18% vs 2%; P <.05) and a reduced ventilatory requirement for maximal exercise, as compared with the control group. The constant work rate exercise duration increased similarly in both groups (116% vs 81%, nonsignificant difference), and posttraining blood lactate was decreased at isotime (P <.05 in both groups), but not at the end of the exercise. CONCLUSION: In this pilot study, exercise training with noninvasive ventilation support was well tolerated and yielded further improvement in the increased exercise tolerance brought about by pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. This improved exercise tolerance is partly explained by a better ventilatory adaptation during exercise.     

Results of a home-based training program for patients with COPD

OBJECTIVES: To have a group of COPD patients undergo a simple program of home-based exercise training, using the shuttle walking test (SWT) to standardize the intensity of training. METHODS: Sixty patients participated, randomly distributed into two groups (rehabilitation and control) of 30 patients each. The following evaluations were carried out at baseline and at 12 weeks: (1) pulmonary function studies; (2) SWT; (3) submaximal intensity resistance test; (4) cycle ergometer test; (5) quality of life; and (6) dyspnea. The rehabilitation group underwent a lower-extremity training program. Walking was selected as the type of exercise. The intensity of training was set at 70% of the maximum speed attained on the SWT. Divided sessions were held, lasting 1 h, 6 days/wk, at home, with a checkup every 2 weeks. The duration of the program was 12 weeks. RESULTS: The following patients completed the study: 20 patients (66.6%) from the rehabilitation group (mean [+/- SD]) age, 64.3 +/- 8.3 years; mean FEV(1), 41.7 +/- 15.6% of predicted); and 17 patients (56.6%) from the control group (mean age, 63.1 +/- 6.9 years; mean FEV(1), 40 +/- 16.4% of predicted). We found no changes in pulmonary function or effort parameters (SWT or cycle ergometer) in the rehabilitation group at 12 weeks. A twofold increase (1,274 +/- 980 to 2,651 +/- 2,056 m; p < 0.001) was achieved in the submaximal intensity resistance test, with less dyspnea at the conclusion of the test (p = 0.05). Significant improvement also was achieved in basal dyspnea and, both statistically and clinically, in the quality of life. Significant changes were not achieved in the control group patients. CONCLUSIONS: A simple home-based program of exercise training achieved improvement in exercise tolerance, posteffort dyspnea, basal dyspnea, and quality of life in COPD patients.     

The effect of pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with post-tuberculosis lung disorder

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Although the benefit of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) has been demonstrated for patients with COPD, the benefit for patients with non-COPD lung disorders is still unclear. In the present study, we compared the effect of PR on patients with post-tuberculosis (TBC) lung disorders and patients with COPD. DESIGN: We performed a prospective nonrandomized open trial over a 9-week period. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-two patients with post-TBC lung disorders (thoracoplasty, 25 patients; mean [+/- SD] age, 71 +/- 5 years; FEV(1), 0.84 +/- 0.29 L) and 32 age-matched and FEV(1)-matched COPD patients were enrolled in the study. First, we compared the exercise tolerance between groups using a 6-min walking test. Next, we trained the patients using a 9-week outpatient PR program. We assessed improvement using clinical dyspnea ratings, a daily activity score, and the results of a 6-min walking test. RESULTS: When age and FEV(1) were matched, the distance covered during the 6-min walking test did not differ between the groups. After rehabilitation, significant improvement was observed in both the post-TBC group and the COPD group in terms of Medical Research Council dyspnea grade, transition dyspnea index, activity score, and 6-min walking distance (42 m [p < 0.01] vs 47 m [p < 0.01], respectively). The magnitudes of the improvement in these parameters were comparable between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: PR is as beneficial in post-TBC lung disorder patients as in COPD patients if the severity of the disability is similar.