Comparison of effects of azelnidipine and trichlormethiazide in combination with olmesartan on blood pressure and metabolic parameters in hypertensive type 2 diabetic patients

Aims/Introduction: Angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers (ARB) are regarded as first‐line treatment for type 2 diabetes with hypertension. However, lowering blood pressure to the target level often requires more than one antihypertensive agent as recommended by the guideline. In this open‐label, prospective, crossover clinical trial, we compared the effects of combination treatment of ARB with a calcium channel blocker (CCB) or with a low‐dose thiazide diuretic on blood pressure (BP) and various metabolic parameters in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes. Materials and Methods: A total of 39 Japanese type 2 diabetics with hypertension treated with olmesartan (20 mg/day) for at least 8 weeks were recruited to this study. At study entry, treatment was switched to either olmesartan (20 mg/day)/azelnidipine (16 mg/day) or olmesartan (20 mg/day)/trichlormethiazide (1 mg/day) and continued for 12 weeks. Then, the drugs were switched and treatment was continued for another 12 weeks. We measured clinical blood pressure and various metabolic parameters before and at the end of each study arm. Results: Compared with the olmesartan/trichlormethiazide treatment, treatment with olmesartan/azelnidipine achieved superior clinical blood pressure and pulse rate control. In contrast, the treatment with olmesartan/trichlormethiazide resulted in increased HbA_1c, serum uric acid and worsening of estimated glomerular filtration rate, though there were no differences in other metabolic parameters including urine 8‐hydroxy‐2′‐deoxyguanosine, C‐reactive protein and adiponectin between the two treatments. Conclusions: Our results show that the combination of ARB with azelnidipine is more beneficial with regard to blood pressure control and metabolic outcome than the combination of olmesartan with low dose trichlormethiazide. This trial was registered with UMIN clinical trial registry (no. UMIN000005064). (J Diabetes Invest, doi: 10.1111/j.2040‐1124.2011.00135.x, 2011)     

Effect of telmisartan on forearm postischemic hyperemia and serum asymmetric dimethylarginine levels

BACKGROUND: Although telmisartan may be more beneficial for glucose metabolism than other angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), it has not been determined whether telmisartan exerts more favorable effects on biological and functional parameters related to endothelial function than other ARBs. METHODS: A study with a crossover design was conducted in 40 hypertensive patients (61 +/- 10 years old, mean +/- SD) who had previously been treated with ARBs other than telmisartan or valsartan (ie, ARBs were switched to either telmisartan 40 mg/day or valsartan 80 mg/day, administered alternately for 12 weeks each). Blood examinations were conducted, and the mean reactive hyperemia ratio (mRHR) was measured by plethysmography for each treatment regimen. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in either blood pressure or plasma levels of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, C-reactive protein, 3-nitrotyrosine, or vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 between the two treatment regimens. The mRHR (2.7 +/- 1.0 v 2.4 +/- 1.0, mean +/- SD) was larger (P < .05), and the plasma levels of asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) (0.45 +/- 0.08 v 0.50 +/- 0.17 micromol/L, mean +/- SD) and the homeostasis model assessment index of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) (2.3 +/- 1.6 v 2.8 +/- 2.1, mean +/- SD) were lower (P < .05) in telmisartan-treated patients than in valsartan treated patients. The percent change in ADMA, but not in HOMA-IR, correlated significantly with that in the mRHR (beta = -0.33, t value = -2.00, P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: At doses producing equivalent hypotensive effects, telmisartan apparently had a more favorable effect on functional parameters related to endothelial function than did valsartan. The reduction in plasma ADMA levels may contribute to this more favorable effect of telmisartan.     

Effects of the angiotensin receptor blocker azilsartan medoxomil versus olmesartan and valsartan on ambulatory and clinic blood pressure in patients with stages 1 and 2 hypertension

Azilsartan medoxomil is an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) being developed for hypertension treatment. To compare this ARB with others in the class, we studied the effects of 2 doses of azilsartan medoxomil, with valsartan 320 mg and olmesartan medoxomil (olmesartan) 40 mg, in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial using ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring and clinic BP measurements. The primary efficacy end point was the change from baseline in 24-hour mean systolic BP. Hierarchical analysis testing for superiority over placebo was followed by noninferiority analysis and then superiority testing of azilsartan medoxomil (80 mg and then 40 mg) versus the comparator ARBs. For 1291 randomized patients, mean age was 56 years, 54% were men, and baseline 24-hour mean systolic BP was 145 mm Hg. Azilsartan medoxomil at 80 mg had superior efficacy to both valsartan at 320 mg and olmesartan at 40 mg: placebo-adjusted 24-hour systolic BP was lowered (-14.3 mm Hg) more than 320 mg of valsartan (-10.0 mm Hg; P<0.001) and 40 mg of olmesartan (-11.7 mm Hg; P=0.009). Azilsartan medoxomil at 40 mg was noninferior to 40 mg of olmesartan (difference: -1.4 mm Hg [95% CI: -3.3 to 0.5]). For clinic systolic BP, both doses of azilsartan medoxomil were superior to the comparator ARBs. Safety and tolerability were similar among the placebo and 4 active treatments. These data demonstrate that azilsartan medoxomil at its maximal dose has superior efficacy to both olmesartan and valsartan at their maximal, approved doses without increasing adverse events. Azilsartan medoxomil could provide higher rates of hypertension control within the ARB class.     

Efficacy and duration of action of the four selective angiotensin II subtype 1 receptor blockers, losartan, candesartan, valsartan and telmisartan, in patients with essential hypertension determined by home blood pressure measurements

Our objective was to compare the efficacy and duration of action of 4 angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs)--losartan (25-100 mg), candesartan (2-12 mg), valsartan (40-80 mg), and telmisartan (10-40 mg)-in patients with essential hypertension using self-measurement of blood pressure at home (home BP) and to examine the differential effect of the four ARBs on home pulse pressure (home PP). After a 2-week run-in period, each of the 4 ARBs was assigned to subjects who were diagnosed as having hypertension on the basis of home BP and who were over 30 years old. The subjects were asked to take the ARB once daily in the morning and to measure home BP once in the evening and in the morning. We compared the efficacy of each ARB on home BP and home PP and assessed the duration of the BP-lowering effect using the morning effect versus evening effect ratio (M/E ratio). The antihypertensive effects of telmisartan on home systolic BP (SBP) both in the evening and in the morning and on home diastolic BP (DBP) in the morning were significantly greater than those of losartan. The effect of each ARB on home BP in the morning and in the evening was expressed as a ratio (M/E ratio). The M/E ratios of SBP/DBP in patients treated with losartan, candesartan, valsartan, and telmisartan were 0.49/0.16, 0.69/1.01, 0.82/0.88, and 0.88/0.88, respectively. The home PP-lowering effect was greater for valsartan and telmisartan than for losartan and candesartan in the morning. Among the 4 ARBs, the duration of the BP-lowering effect of losartan did not persist throughout 24 hr. The effects of the other 3 ARBs, in particular telmisartan, persisted over 24 hr when they were administered once daily in the morning. In addition, the duration of the PP-lowering effect was similar to that of the BP-lowering effect. Such long-acting property of several ARBs is essential for the modern antihypertensive treatment, and home BP measurements are useful for determining the duration of action of antihypertensive drugs. Losartan, 25 mg a day, which is usually used as an initial dose in Japan, is apparently insufficient to obtain adequate antihypertensive effect and sufficient duration of action.     

Efficacy and Duration of Action of the Four Selective Angiotensin II Subtype 1 Receptor Blockers,Losartan, Candesartan,Valsartan and Telmisartan,in Patients with Essential Hypertension Determined by Home Blood Pressure Measurements

Our objective was to compare the efficacy and duration of action of 4 angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs)—losartan (25–100 mg), candesartan (2–12 mg), valsartan (40–80 mg), and telmisartan (10–40 mg)—in patients with essential hypertension using self-measurement of blood pressure at home (home BP) and to examine the differential effect of the four ARBs on home pulse pressure (home PP). After a 2-week run-in period, each of the 4 ARBs was assigned to subjects who were diagnosed as having hypertension on the basis of home BP and who were over 30 years old. The subjects were asked to take the ARB once daily in the morning and to measure home BP once in the evening and in the morning. We compared the efficacy of each ARB on home BP and home PP and assessed the duration of the BP-lowering effect using the morning effect versus evening effect ratio (M/E ratio). The antihypertensive effects of telmisartan on home systolic BP (SBP) both in the evening and in the morning and on home diastolic BP (DBP) in the morning were significantly greater than those of losartan. The effect of each ARB on home BP in the morning and in the evening was expressed as a ratio (M/E ratio). The M/E ratios of SBP/DBP in patients treated with losartan, candesartan, valsartan, and telmisartan were 0.49/0.16, 0.69/1.01, 0.82/0.88, and 0.88/0.88, respectively. The home PP-lowering effect was greater for valsartan and telmisartan than for losartan and candesartan in the morning. Among the 4 ARBs, the duration of the BP-lowering effect of losartan did not persist throughout 24 hr. The effects of the other 3 ARBs, in particular telmisartan, persisted over 24 hr when they were administered once daily in the morning. In addition, the duration of the PP-lowering effect was similar to that of the BP-lowering effect. Such long-acting property of several ARBs is essential for the modern antihypertensive treatment, and home BP measurements are useful for determining the duration of action of antihypertensive drugs. Losartan, 25 mg a day, which is usually used as an initial dose in Japan, is apparently insufficient to obtain adequate antihypertensive effect and sufficient duration of action.     

Clinical and Experimental Aspects of Olmesartan Medoxomil,a New Angiotensin II Receptor Antagonist

Olmesartan medoxomil is a new orally active angiotensin II (Ang II) type 1 receptor antagonist. It is a prodrug and is rapidly de‐esterified during absorption to form olmesartan, the active metabolite. Olmesartan is a potent, competitive and selective Ang II type 1 receptor antagonist. Olmesartan is not metabolized by the cytochrome P‐450 and has a dual route of elimination, by kidneys and liver. In patients with essential hypertension olmesartan medoxomil administered once daily at doses of 10–80 mg dose‐dependently reduced diastolic blood pressure (DBP). Troughto‐peak ratios for both DBP and systolic blood pressure (SBP) were above 50%. At the recommended once‐daily starting doses, olmesartan medoxomil (20 mg) was more effective than losartan (50 mg), valsartan (80 mg) or irbesartan (150 mg) in reducing cuff DBP in patients with essential hypertension. The results of cuff SBP and mean 24‐h DBP and SBP were similar to those of cuff DBP measurement. In mild‐to‐moderate hypertensive patients the recommended starting dose of olmesartan medoxomil was as effective as that of amlodipine besylate (5 mg/day) in reducing both cuff and 24‐h blood pressure. In lowering DBP olmesartan medoxomil, at 10–20 mg/day, was as effective as atenolol at 50–100 mg/day. In mild‐to‐moderate hypertensive patients, olmesartan medoxomil, at 5–20 mg once daily, was more effective than captopril at 12.5–50 mg twice daily. At 20–40 mg once daily olmesartan medoxomil was as effective as felodipine, at 5–10 mg once daily. Olmesartan medoxomil has minimal adverse effects with no clinically important drug interactions. Animal studies have shown that olmesartan medoxomil provides a wide range of organ protection. Olmesartan medoxomil ameliorated atherosclerosis in hyperlipidemic animals and ameliorated cardiac remodeling and improved survival in rats with myocardial infarction. Olmesartan medoxomil has renoprotective effects in a remnant kidney model and type 2 diabetes models. Future investigation should reveal whether these beneficial effects of olmesartan medoxomil are applicable to human diseases.     

奥美沙坦酯与缬沙坦对原发性高血压患者血压晨峰的影响

目的比较奥美沙坦酯和缬沙坦治疗高血压患者血压晨峰的疗效。方法选择我院76例原发性高血压患者随机分为2组,分别接受奥美沙坦酯20-40mg／d或缬沙坦80-160mg／d治疗,共8周,观察服药前及服药后清晨血压变化。结果奥美沙坦酯组和缬沙坦组治疗后晨峰血压均有明显下降,与治疗前比较差异有统计学意义（P〈0．05）。奥美沙坦酯组和缬沙坦组晨峰血压下降的幅度分别为：／kSBP（10．22±0．35）mmHg、（5．63±0．21）mmHg;△DBP（7．71±0．29）mmHg、（3．55±0．14）mmHg,奥美沙坦酯组血压晨峰下降幅度高于缬沙坦组,差异有统计学意义（P〈0．05）。结论奥美沙坦酯和缬沙坦均可以有效地控制原发性高血压患者血压晨蜂现象,奥美沙坦酯优于缬沙坦。     

Effects of telmisartan 80 mg and valsartan 160 mg on ambulatory blood pressure in patients with essential hypertension

OBJECTIVES: This trial investigated and compared the antihypertensive efficacy of telmisartan and valsartan, two angiotensin II receptor blockers, used in monotherapy at their maximum recommended dose in hypertensive patients. METHODS: We studied 70 subjects (32 men and 38 women) aged 47.6 +/- 12.2 (mean +/- SD) years, with mild to moderate essential hypertension; they were randomly assigned to receive monotherapy with either telmisartan (80 mg) or valsartan (160 mg), in the form of a single daily tablet upon awakening. Blood pressure was measured by ambulatory monitoring every 20 min during the day and every 30 min at night for 48 consecutive hours before and after 3 months of treatment. Physical activity was simultaneously monitored every minute by wrist actigraphy to calculate accurately the diurnal and nocturnal means of blood pressure on a per subject basis. RESULTS: There was a highly significant blood pressure reduction during the 24 h with both drugs. The blood pressure reduction in the 24-h mean was significantly larger for valsartan 160 mg (18.6 and 12.1 mmHg for systolic and diastolic blood pressure, respectively) than for telmisartan 80 mg (10.8 and 8.4 mmHg; P < 0.001 between treatment-groups). There was also a highly significant reduction (P < 0.001) of 6.5 mmHg in the 24-h mean of pulse pressure after valsartan administration only. The trough : peak ratio and the smoothness index were slightly higher in systolic, but similar in diastolic blood pressure, for telmisartan as compared to valsartan. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a shorter half-life, 160 mg/day valsartan was more effective in lowering blood pressure over 24 h than 80 mg/day telmisartan. Furthermore, valsartan was also more effective in lowering arterial pulse pressure, an observation that may have important therapeutic implications, given the mounting evidence that pulse pressure may be a risk factor for future cardiovascular events.     

Effect of Switching from Telmisartan,Valsartan, Olmesartan,or Losartan to Candesartan on Morning Hypertension

The Candesartan Cooperative Research of Therapy Design for Early Morning Hypertension in CHIBA was designed to investigate whether switching from angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) except candesartan to candesartan might be effective in Japanese patients with morning hypertension. Seventy-eight mild to moderate hypertensive patients, who were treated with the standard doses of ARBs except candesartan (losartan, 50 mg; valsartan, 80 mg; telmisartan, 40 mg; or olmesartan, 20 mg), were entered into 12-week treatment period with candesartan 8 mg according to a multicenter, open-label design. Morning and office blood pressures (BPs) were significantly reduced (morning, ?10.1 ± 10.5/?4.5 ± 8.4 mm Hg; office, ?13.1 ± 17.3/?6.2 ± 11.3 mm Hg) after medication change. Target BPs (morning BPs ≤ 135/85 mm Hg and office BPs ≤ 140/90 mm Hg) achievement rates were 42.9% in the morning and 64.3% at office. No adverse events were recognized in all patients. Candesartan treatment significantly reduced the morning and office BPs compared with other ARBs in Japanese patients with morning hypertension.     

Comparison of increasing doses of olmesartan medoxomil, losartan potassium, and valsartan in patients with essential hypertension

This 12-week, randomized, double-blind, forced-titration study compared the efficacy of 3 angiotensin receptor blockers. Patients received olmesartan medoxomil 20 mg, losartan potassium 50 mg, valsartan 80 mg, or placebo once daily. At week 4, doses were titrated to 40, 100, and 160 mg once daily for olmesartan, losartan, and valsartan, respectively. At week 8, losartan was increased to 50 mg twice daily and valsartan increased to 320 mg once daily (olmesartan remained at 40 mg once daily). The primary end point was mean change from baseline in seated diastolic blood pressure (SeDBP) at week 8. All 3 medications significantly reduced mean SeDBP from baseline compared with placebo at weeks 4, 8, and 12 (P<.001). At week 8, olmesartan reduced mean SeDBP more than losartan (P<.001); more patients in the olmesartan medoxomil group achieved a blood pressure goal of <140/90 mm Hg (P<.001). Olmesartan did not reduce mean SeDBP significantly compared with valsartan, although more patients attained blood pressure goal with olmesartan (P=.031). At week 12, all agents lowered blood pressure equivalently.     

Comparative efficacy of olmesartan, losartan, valsartan, and irbesartan in the control of essential hypertension

In a multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial, the authors compared the antihypertensive efficacy of once-daily treatment with the new angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker (ARB) olmesartan (20 mg) with recommended starting doses of losartan (50 mg), valsartan (80 mg), and irbesartan (150 mg) in 588 patients with a cuff diastolic blood pressure (DBP) of ≥100 and ≥115 mm Hg and a mean daytime DBP of ≥90 mm Hg and <120 mm Hg, as measured by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Cuff and ambulatory blood pressures were monitored at baseline and after 8 weeks of treatment. All groups were predominantly white and approximately 62% male, and their mean age was approximately 52 years. In all groups, mean baseline DBP and systolic blood pressure (SBP) were approximately 104 and 157 mm Hg, respectively. The reduction of sitting cuff DBP with olmesartan (11.5 mm Hg), the primary efficacy variable of this study, was significantly greater than with losartan, valsartan, and irbesartan (8.2, 7.9, and 9.9 mm Hg, respectively). Reductions of cuff SBP with the four ARBs ranged from 8.4–11.3 mm Hg and were not significantly different. The reduction in mean 24-hour DBP with olmesartan (8.5 mm Hg) was significantly greater than reductions with losartan and valsartan (6.2 and 5.6 mm Hg, respectively) and showed a trend toward significance when compared to the reduction in DBP with irbesartan (7.4 mm Hg; p=0.087). The reduction in mean 24-hour SBP with olmesartan (12.5 mm Hg) was significantly greater than the reductions with losartan and valsartan (9.0 and 8.1 mm Hg, respectively) and equivalent to the reduction with irbesartan (11.3 mm Hg). All drugs were well tolerated. The authors conclude that olmesartan, at its starting dose, is more effective than the starting doses of the other ARBs tested in reducing cuff DBP in patients with essential hypertension.     

The MUSCAT study: a Multicenter PROBE Study Comparing the Effects of Angiotensin II Type-1 Receptor Blockers on Self-Monitored Home Blood Pressure in Patients with Morning Hypertension: study design and background characteristics.

Elevated morning home blood pressure (MHBP) has been reported to have a close relationship to cerebro-cardiovascular events and hypertensive target organ damages, and hence is regarded as a predictor of cardiovascular events. However, there is no evidence that lowering of MHBP can improve morbidity, mortality or target organ damage. In recent guidelines, angiotensin II type-1 receptor blockers (ARBs) are recommended as the first-choice drugs for antihypertensive therapy. Pharmacological characteristics differ among ARBs, and some are suggested to have greater efficacy in lowering MHBP than others. In preparation for the MUSCAT study, we surveyed both self-monitored MHBP and office blood pressure (OBP) in 1,234 patients with essential hypertension. Among them, 367 patients had diabetes mellitus (DM) and 229 suffered from chronic kidney disease (CKD). More than 64% (n=790) of patients had morning hypertension. In MUSCAT, we will investigate the different effects of four ARBs (losartan, candesartan, valsartan, and telmisartan) in patients with morning hypertension, with a focus on the drugs' MHBP-lowering efficiency. Secondly, we will evaluate the different actions of the four ARBs on cardiovascular surrogate markers, such as the brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity, high-sensitive C-reactive protein level, and urinary albumin excretion/creatinine ratio. Patients will be randomized into four arms, and given one of the four "sartans" once daily for 12 months. MHBPs and surrogate markers will be examined at baseline and after 1 year of follow-up. In the stratified analysis, we will determine the significance of MHBP reduction on cardiovascular risk management.     

Comparison of the effects of telmisartan and olmesartan on home blood pressure, glucose, and lipid profiles in patients with hypertension, chronic heart failure, and metabolic syndrome

We compared the effects of telmisartan and olmesartan in 20 patients with chronic heart failure and metabolic syndrome. The subjects underwent once-daily 40 mg telmisartan for at least 3 months before switching to once-daily 20 mg olmesartan for the next 3 months (post 1). They were then treated with 3 months of once-daily 40 mg telmisartan (post 2). Systolic and diastolic blood pressure in the early morning, plasma B-type natriuretic peptide, serum total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and triglyceride levels were increased at post 1 (p < 0.005, p < 0.05, p < 0.05, p < 0.05, p < 0.05, and p < 0.005 vs. baseline, respectively) before returning to their baseline values at post 2. The changes in plasma B-type natriuretic peptide levels correlated significantly with the shifts in systolic and diastolic blood pressure in the early morning at posts 1 and 2. Meanwhile, there were no fluctuations in either blood pressure in the late evening or in the outpatient room; nor were there fluctuations in heart rate. Simultaneously, neither serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol nor fasting blood sugar levels differed significantly between posts. Moreover, telmisartan had more beneficial effects on glucose and lipid profiles in patients with relatively high HbA1c, serum total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and triglyceride levels. Therefore, we concluded that telmisartan was more beneficial than olmesartan for controlling blood pressure in the early morning, as well as for improving glucose and lipid profiles in patients with hypertension, chronic heart failure, and metabolic syndrome.     

Pretreatment plasma renin activity levels correlate with the blood pressure response to telmisartan in essential hypertension

BACKGROUND: Although the therapeutic response to angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) is assumed impaired in patients with low-renin hypertension, data are scarce about the association between levels of plasma renin activity (PRA) before treatment and response of ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) to ARBs in essential hypertension. METHODS: We prospectively studied 11 untreated Japanese patients with essential hypertension (3 women and 8 men, mean age: 50 +/- 9 (mean +/- SD) years). After a 4-week drug-free period, telmisartan 20-40 mg was administered orally once daily for 8 weeks. PRA levels were measured before treatment. The first ABP measurement was performed at the end of the drug-free period and the second measurement at the end of the treatment period with telmisartan. RESULTS: Telmisartan significantly decreased the 24-h ABP by 12 +/- 11 mm Hg systolic (P < 0.01) and 9 +/- 8 mm Hg diastolic (P < 0.01). Reductions in the 24-h systolic and diastolic ABPs were significantly greater in five patients with higher renin levels (> or =0.65 ng/ml/h) than in six patients with lower renin levels (<0.65 ng/ml/h) by 18 mm Hg systolic (P < 0.001) and 11 mm Hg diastolic (P < 0.05). Changes in the 24-h systolic and diastolic ABPs significantly correlated with log PRA before treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The ABP lowering effects of telmisartan were dependent on PRA levels before treatment in patients with essential hypertension. Measurement of PRA levels before treatment is thought to be useful for prediction of the ABP lowering effects of telmisartan.     

The differential effects of angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers on microalbuminuria in relation to low-grade inflammation in metabolic hypertensive patients

BACKGROUND: A dual angiotensin type 1 receptor blocker (ARB)/peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (PPARgamma) agonist telmisartan may be more useful for microalbuminuria reduction than ARBs with no PPARgamma agonistic action. We investigated whether there is a difference between the effects of telmisartan and valsartan with respect to microalbuminuria reduction, and the association with improvement of metabolic features or suppression of the inflammatory state. METHODS: Fifty-three patients who had metabolic syndrome and had been taking valsartan were recruited. All of these patients were randomly assigned to replace valsartan by telmisartan (telmisartan group; n = 30) or to keep taking valsartan (control group; n = 21). Various parameters were measured at baseline and 12 weeks after randomization. RESULTS: There were no significant changes in blood pressure (BP), glucose, and lipid parameters between baseline and 12 weeks after randomization in either group. There was a significant increase in high molecular weight adiponectin in the telmisartan group (4.6 v 5.0 microg/mL, P = .024), whereas there was no significant change in the control group. The reductions of microalbuminuria and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) were significant in the telmisartan group (28.1 v 18.9 mg/g.Cr and 0.77 v 0.60 mg/L, respectively, P = .001 and P = .022), whereas there was no significant change in the control group. The reductions of microalbuminuria and hs-CRP were significantly correlated with each other (gamma = 0.413, P = .003). CONCLUSIONS: The dual ARB/PPARgamma agonist telmisartan achieved more microalbuminuria reduction than an ARB with no PPARgamma agonistic action, possibly through suppression of the inflammatory state in metabolic hypertensive patients.     

Renoprotective effects of blockade of angiotensin II AT1 receptors in an animal model of type 2 diabetes.

To evaluate the efficacy of angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) for use in the treatment of diabetic nephropathy, we examined the effects of olmesartan medoxomil (olmesartan), an angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) specific ARB, on the progression of nephropathy in Zucker diabetic fatty (ZDF) rats, an animal model of type 2 diabetes. We used 2 doses of olmesartan, a sub-antihypertensive dose and an antihypertensive dose, to specifically examine whether the drug exerts beneficial effects on the kidney without lowering blood pressure. Olmesartan mixed in the diet at a concentration of 0.001% (approximately 0.6 mg/kg/day) or 0.01% (approximately 6 mg/kg/day) was administered for 19 weeks starting from 12 weeks of age, when the animals developed microalbuminuria. Lean non-diabetic rats served as controls. ZDF rats had hyperglycemia, hyperinsulinemia, and moderate hypertension as compared to lean control rats. Plasma glucose and insulin concentrations were not affected by olmesartan, and blood pressure was lowered only by the high dose of olmesartan. Progressive proteinuria in ZDF rats was greatly (about 70%) suppressed by the high dose of olmesartan and moderately (about 30%) suppressed by the low dose that did not significantly lower blood pressure. ZDF rats exhibited hyperlipidemia and hypoalbuminemia, both of which were substantially corrected by treatment with olmesartan. The histological evidence of glomerular and tubular damage in the ZDF rats was also reduced by the drug. These results indicate that AT1 receptor blockade with olmesartan retards the progression of nephropathy associated with type 2 diabetes without affecting glucose metabolism, and that this renal protective effect is at least partly independent of the antihypertensive effect of the drug.     

Effects of blood pressure and the renin‐angiotensin system on platelet activation in type 2 diabetes

Aims/Introduction: Platelet‐derived microparticles (PDMP) are released from the platelets either after activation or in response to physical stimulation in vivo. The present study examined the association between blood pressure and PDMP, and the effects of high‐dose angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) on PDMP in patients with type 2 diabetes. Materials and Methods: The study subjects consisted of 28 type 2 diabetes patients with blood pressure ≥130/80 mmHg who were treated with valsartan (80 mg daily). The patients were randomly assigned to take either 80 mg of telmisartan (Tel group) or 160 mg of valsartan (Val group) and then were followed up for 24 weeks. Thereafter, the patients were switched to combination therapy (5 mg of amlodipine with 40 mg of telmisartan [Tel group] or 80 mg of valsartan [Val group]) for 12 weeks. Results: Although the ambulatory blood pressure did not change, the PDMP levels were significantly decreased from baseline to week 24 (high dose ARB). In contrast, combination therapy reduced both blood pressure and PDMP levels compared with the baseline. Although the PDMP level was significantly correlated with the morning BP elevation at baseline and week 36 (combination therapy), this same relationship was not found at week 24. There were no significant differences in the blood pressure and PDMP levels between the two groups. Conclusions: Patients with morning hypertension might be at risk for cardiovascular diseases. High‐dose renin‐angiotensin system inhibition and blood pressure control are both considered to reduce cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes. (J Diabetes Invest, doi: 10.1111/j.2040‐1124.2010.00048.x, 2010)     

Efficacy of Low-Dose Hydrochlorothiazide in Combination with Telmisartan on Early Morning Blood Pressure in Uncontrolled Hypertensive Patients

Hypertensive patients whose BP was uncontrolled despite the use of antihypertensive agents, including an ARB (candesartan 8 mg/day or valsartan 80 mg/day), were enrolled. The patients were randomly assigned to combination therapy with telmisartan 40 mg/day (changed from current ARB) and hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 12.5 mg/day (T?+?H, n?=?32) or to no change in their current drug regimen (CTL, n?=?32). The observation period was 12 weeks. The office and home BPs were significantly reduced in the T?+?H compared to those in the CTL. A sufficient and long-acting BP lowering effect, as reflected in decreased early morning BP, was obtained with the combination of low-dose HCTZ and telmisartan without apparent metabolic deterioration.     

Combination treatment with telmisartan and hydrochlorothiazide in black patients with mild to moderate hypertension

BACKGROUND: Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) is commonly used to treat black patients with hypertension. To avoid the metabolic disturbances associated with high-dose HCTZ, blood pressure control may be achieved by combining low doses with another antihypertensive. HYPOTHESIS: The study was undertaken to assess the tolerability and antihypertensive dose-response efficacy of telmisartan and HCTZ and their combination in black patients with mild to moderate hypertension (mean supine blood pressure 140/95-200/114 mmHg). METHODS: Following a 4-week, single-blind, placebo run-in period, 222 black patients were randomized to once-daily treatment with one of 20 different double-blind combinations of telmisartan (0, 20, 40, 80, 160 mg) and HCTZ (0, 6.25, 12.5, 25 mg) for 8 weeks. Blood pressure was measured at baseline and after 2, 4, and 8 weeks. RESULTS: Telmisartan 80 mg/HCTZ 12.5 mg reduced supine trough diastolic blood pressure (DBP)--primary efficacy parameter--by 13.3 mmHg, and supine trough systolic blood pressure (SBP) by 21.5 mmHg. These reductions represented benefits of 13.7/8.7 mmHg over telmisartan 80 mg and 12.3/8.1 mmHg over HCTZ 12.5 mg (p < 0.01). Telmisartan 40 mg/HCTZ 12.5 mg reduced supine trough SBP/DBP by 14.3/10.0 mmHg, amounting to 12.3/3.3 mmHg more than telmisartan 40 mg and 5.1/4.8 mmHg more than HCTZ 12.5 mg. This reached significance for the comparisons with telmisartan 40 mg for SBP and HCTZ 12.5 mg for DBP (p<0.05). A response surface analysis and therapeutic response rates confirmed the additive antihypertensive effects of telmisartan and HCTZ. All treatments were well tolerated, with side-effect profiles comparable with placebo. Adverse events were mainly transient and of mild to moderate severity. CONCLUSIONS: Telmisartan 80 mg combined with HCTZ 12.5 mg is effective and well tolerated in black patients with mild to moderate hypertension, providing greater antihypertensive activity than the corresponding monotherapies.     

Telmisartan ramipril combination therapy reduces strokes and improves cardiac and renal protection in stroke prone spontaneously hypertensive rats

Clinical and animal experimental studies suggest that combination therapy using angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors provides superior blood pressure (BP) lowering and target organ protection than either agent alone. We tested combination therapy with telmisartan and ramipril in lowering BP and protecting against stroke and target-organ damage in salt-fed stroke prone spontaneously hypertensive rats. Twenty-five rats were assigned to each of five groups: control (C), telmisartan (T), ramipril (R), and telmisartan + ramipril at full (TR) and at half-dose (½TR). Full dose telmisartan was 1 mg/kg/day and ramipril .4 mg/kg/day. Rats were fed a stroke prone diet for 8 weeks starting at age 7.5 weeks. Eighty-three percent C and 56% R showed behavioral signs of stroke. There were no strokes in other groups. BP was lower than control in all groups and lowest in TR. Urinary protein excretion, renal damage scores, and left ventricle cardiac collagen areas were lower than controls in all telmisartan treatment groups and lowest in TR. Telmisartan was superior to ramipril in preventing strokes, and telmisartan/ramipril combination therapy provided better BP control and greater cardio-renal protection than telmisartan alone.