Surgical approach to ascending aorta in bicuspid aortic valve

OBJECTIVE: Former studies have pointed out that hemodynamic stress imposed by associated valvular disease is the primary factor in the development of ascending aorta dilatation. At present, intrinsic wall pathology is blamed for dilatation and aneurysm formation in bicuspid aortic valve (BAV). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Aortic valve replacement (AVR) was performed on 78 adult patients with BAV. Patients were divided into two groups. Group I (n = 27) underwent only AVR. Group II (n = 51) underwent AVR and additional ascending aorta procedures such as Shawl-Lapel aortoplasty (n = 12) and tailoring aortoplasty (n = 9). Dacron wrapping was performed after both techniques were done. Ascending aorta replacement was done on 11 patients by using composite graft. Supracoronary graft replacement was performed in 3 patients after AVR. RESULTS: Ascending aorta diameter increment was 1.25 mm/year in normotensive and 2.80 mm/ year in hypertensive patients. Ascending aorta aneurysm (diameter > 55 mm) developed in eight patients in the postoperative period in group I. Ascending aorta dilatation did not develop in group II patients. Mean survival time +/- standard error (SE) was 128 +/- 11 and 99 +/- 4 months and survival possibility was 77.78% and 92.16%. Freedom from reoperation was 65.4% and 95.9% in 8 years in group I and group II, respectively. CONCLUSION: Aortic wrapping with or without aortoplasty has a beneficial effect not only in dilated ascending aorta but also in all nondilated BAV patients with normal-sized aortic diameter. Ascending aorta wrapping in BAV patients preserves the endothelial lining and prevents further dilatation, aneurysm formation, and dissection.     

Reduction aortoplasty for dilatation of the ascending aorta in patients with bicuspid aortic valve

BACKGROUND: Individuals with bicuspid aortic valve tend to develop a dilatation of the ascending aorta. It is controversial whether the dilated ascending aorta should be replaced with a tube graft or whether the diameter of the aorta should be reduced by reduction aortoplasty. Furthermore, it is unclear whether an external prosthetic support of the reduction aortoplasty is necessary. The aim of this study is to analyze the results of reduction aortoplasty with and without external prosthetic support. METHODS: Between 1985 and 1999, a total of 115 patients with bicuspid aortic valve and dilatation of the ascending aorta underwent reduction aortoplasty in combination with other types of open-heart procedure at our institution. The diameter of the ascending aorta was measured before and early after surgery and then later between 12 and 144 months (mean 40 months) postoperatively using echocardiography and computed tomography. RESULTS: The reduction aortoplasty decreased the internal diameter of the aorta from 48.7+/-5.1 mm preoperatively to 36.9+/-3.6 mm early after surgery (p = 0.0001). During follow-up, there was no increase of the aortic diameter either in patients with external prosthetic support or in 97 of 106 patients without external prosthetic support. The diameter increased only in 9 (8.5%) of 106 patients without external aortic support by 4 to 8 mm. In patients with postoperative diameter increase, the aortic diameter after operation had been higher than in patients without a postoperative increase of the aortic diameter (41.4+/-3.1 mm vs 36.6+/-3.4 mm; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Reduction aortoplasty showed good long-term results in patients with bicuspid aortic valve and dilatation of the ascending aorta. Redilation of the aorta occurred only in patients with a suboptimal diameter reduction.     

Congenital bicuspid aortic valve and an aneurysm of the ascending aorta

BACKGROUND: A congenital bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) in adults is known to be associated with aortopathy, specifically with aneurysms of the ascending aorta (AA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten (16.7%) patients with congenital BAV had an aneurysm of the AA. Aortic valve replacement was performed in 58 patients, repair in two. Aneurysms were repaired by a vertical reduction (tailoring) aortoplasty (VRA) with or without external synthetic grafting (wrapping, wrap) in nine patients, replaced in one. RESULTS: There were no operative deaths. One patient died 87 months after the operation due to a noncardiac cause. Fifty-four patients are alive and well, without the evidence of recurrence of an aneurysm. CONCLUSIONS: A VRA with or without external synthetic wrapping appears to be a satisfactory alternative to replacement procedures for the AA aneurysm in older patients with BAV, and those with comorbid conditions.     

主动脉瓣二瓣畸形与升主动脉形变的血流动力学关系

主动脉瓣二瓣畸形(BAV)是常见的先天性心脏病,BAV与升主动脉形变的血流动力学之间的关系至关重要,本文旨在对其进行综述。     

Management of the valve and ascending aorta in adults with bicuspid aortic valve disease

Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) disease is the most common congenital cardiac malformation, being present in 1% to 2% of the population. It is heritable and is three to four times more likely to occur in men. The pathogenesis of BAV disease is unknown. Bicuspid valves progress to aortic stenosis or insufficiency in the majority of patients. BAV disease is associated with several anomalies of the aorta including coarctation, aneurysm formation, and dissection. Several lines of evidence suggest that aortic complications are caused by the same underlying factor that causes BAV disease, rather than being a consequence of turbulent blood flow through a stenotic valve. Several different surgical options exist for patients with BAV disease depending on the age of presentation and the size and appearance of the aorta. We herein describe our surgical management of the aortic valve and ascending aorta in patients with BAV disease.     

Different hemodynamic stress of the ascending aorta wall in patients with bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valve

It is unclear whether ascending aorta dilation in patients with bicuspid aortic valve is caused by abnormal hemodynamics or by a common developmental defect of the aortic valve and aortic wall. We performed an echocardiographic study to examine the differences in hemodynamic stress at the ascending aorta in patients with bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valve. We studied prospectively 58 consecutive patients referred for preoperative echocardiographic examination with aortic valve stenosis and either bicuspid or tricuspid valve and an ascending aortic diameter of 相似文献   

Pseudoaneurysm of ascending aorta after aortic valve replacement

A pseudoaneurysm of the ascending aorta is an unusual and potentially fatal complication after aortic surgical procedures. A contrast computed tomographic scan is the investigation of choice. Surgical treatment is mandatory. We describe the successful management of a pseudoaneurysm of the ascending aorta by instituting femorofemoral bypass and achieving hypothermic circulatory arrest, which provided safe reentry and prevented an impending rupture.     

A case of ascending aortic dissection after aortic valve replacement in congenital bicuspid aortic valve]

Congenital bicuspid aortic valve is a risk factor of aortic dissection, but the case is rare in Japan. Several reports described ascending aortic aneurysm after aortic valve replacement. In these reports, most of aneurysms were false aneurysm, but the cases of ascending aortic dissection were rare. In this case, dissecting aneurysm of the ascending aorta occurred 4 years after aortic valve replacement, which was performed with mechanical prosthesis because of infective endocarditis, and it was repaired successfully by the modified Cabrol's method. This case was congenital bicuspid aortic valve, and had already been complicated with moderate aortic dilatation in the ascending aorta. In patients of congenital bicuspid aortic valve with aortic dilatation, consideration of complete replacement of the ascending aorta with aortic valve replacement is important.     

Open hemiarch versus clamped ascending aorta replacement for aortopathy during initial bicuspid aortic valve replacement

BackgroundThere is controversy regarding the extent of aortic resection necessary in patients with aortopathy related to bicuspid aortic valve disease. To address this issue, we reviewed our experience in patients undergoing ascending aorta replacement during bicuspid aortic valve replacement.MethodsWe reviewed 702 patients who underwent ascending aorta replacement at the time of initial nonemergent native bicuspid aortic valve replacement at our institution between January 2000 and June 2017. Treatment cohorts included an open hemiarch replacement group (n = 225; 32%) and a clamped ascending aorta replacement group (n = 477; 68%).ResultsMedian patient age was 60 years (interquartile range [IQR], 51-67 years), female sex was present in 113 patients (16%), ejection fraction was 62% (IQR, 56%-66%), and aortic arch diameter was 33 mm (IQR, 29-36 mm). Cardiopulmonary bypass time was longer in the hemiarch replacement group (188 minutes vs 97 minutes; P < .001). Procedure-related complications (36%) and mortality (<1%) were similar in the 2 groups; however, the hemiarch group had an increased odds of blood transfusion (odds ratio, 1.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15-2.28; P = .006). The median duration of follow-up was 6.0 years (95% CI, 5.3-6.8 years). Overall survival was 94 ± 1% at 5 years and 80 ± 2% at 10 years. Multivariable analysis demonstrated similar survival in the 2 groups (hazard ratio, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.51-1.33; P = .439). No repeat aortic arch operations were done for aortopathy over the duration of clinical follow-up.ConclusionsCompared with patients in the clamped ascending aorta replacement group, patients in the hemi-arch replacement group had longer cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic cross-clamp times, along with an increased risk of blood transfusion, but similar freedom from repeat aortic arch operation and survival. We identified no advantage of performing hemiarch replacement in the absence of aortic arch dilation.     

Options for repair of a bicuspid aortic valve and ascending aortic aneurysm

BACKGROUND: Intrinsic abnormality of the aortic wall may explain the association of bicuspid aortic valves with ascending aortic aneurysms. Separate valve and graft repair of such lesions, rather than composite valve graft replacement, is more straightforward but leaves potentially abnormal sinuses behind. METHODS: Between January 1985 and January 1998, 45 patients underwent separate valve and graft (n = 27) or composite valve graft (n = 18) for an ascending aortic aneurysm and bicuspid aortic valve. Perioperative events and late results were compared. RESULTS: Patients undergoing separate valve and graft were older (mean age, 60 +/- 13 vs 42 +/- 12 years, p < 0.001) and were more likely to have purely stenotic (48% vs 6%, p = 0.003) than purely regurgitant (11% vs 72%, p < 0.001) disease. They were also more likely to require concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting (56% vs 6%, p = 0.001). There were no significant differences in operative risk and no known late complications related to recurrent aneurysms. CONCLUSIONS: Root replacement with a composite valve graft can be accomplished with low operative risk and is the first choice for repair of this lesion. Separate valve and graft repair, however, yields satisfactory early and late results and remains an acceptable option, especially when the coronary ostea are not displaced or when concomitant procedures must be performed.     

Replacement of ascending aorta with aortic valve reimplantation: midterm results

Objective: Aneurysms of the aortic root lead to aortic valve incompetence due to dilatation of the sinotubular junction and annuloaortic ectasia. Reimplantation of the native, structurally intact aortic valve within a Dacron tube graft corrects annular ectasia as well as dilatation of sinotubular junction and aortic sinuses. Durability of this valve repair with respect to increased mechanical stress on valve cusps is discussed controversially and is yet unknown. Methods: Since 7/93, replacement of the ascending aorta with repair of the aortic valve was performed in 48 patients (34 male, 14 female; 47±20 years) with aortic insufficiency and aneurysm of the aortic root. Fifteen patients (31%) had Marfan's syndrome and five patients (10%) had an aortic dissection type A (two acute, three chronic). In 11 patients (23%), concomitant replacement of the aortic arch was necessary utilizing elephant trunk technique in two patients. Additionally, one patient required mitral valve repair and two other patients coronary artery bypass grafts. Clinical and echocardiographic follow-up was performed in 6–12 month intervals for a cumulative study period of 100 patient years. Results: There were no operative deaths. Two patients (4%) died 5 and 20 months postoperatively. One additional patient experienced a TIA within the first postoperative week. Three patients (6%) with an early postoperative aortic insufficiency (AI)>1 required aortic valve replacement after 9, 11, and 14 months due to progressive AI. In these patients, distortion of the aortic root geometry led to valve incompetence. All other patients have no or mild aortic insufficiency. The repair now remains stable for up to 63 months (mean 25±18 months). Other valve related complications did not occur. Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that this type of aortic valve repair achieves excellent results in selected patients. Perfect coaptation of valve cusps during the repair with no or only trace AI at initial echocardiography seems to be essential for durability.     

Ascending aorta dissection associated with bicuspid aortic valve

Aortic dissection etiology involve many factors that are difficult to identify clearly. We report a 47-year-old man who underwent a Bentall operation with reattachment of bypass grafts for a dissecting aneurysm (DeBakey type II) 4 years after combined triple coronary artery bypass grafting and mitral valve replacement. This case appeared to be associated with factors leading to dissecting aneurysm although it remains unclear which was more influential congenital bicuspid aortic valve or proximal anastomosis of venous grafts or both. This case suggests the need to consider appropriate timing in surgical intervention for cases of congenital bicuspid aortic valves and the selection of additional aortic valve replacement in initial surgery.