Subclinical Acute Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Positive Crossmatch Renal Allografts

Subclinical antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) has been described in renal allograft recipients with stable serum creatinine (SCr), however whether this leads to development of chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) remains unknown. We retrospectively reviewed data from 83 patients who received HLA-incompatible renal allografts following desensitization to remove donor-specific antibodies (DSA). Ten patients had an allograft biopsy showing subclinical AMR [stable SCr, neutrophil margination in peritubular capillaries (PTC), diffuse PTC C4d, positive DSA] during the first year post-transplantation; 3 patients were treated with plasmapheresis and intravenous immunoglobulin. Three patients had a subsequent rise in SCr and an associated biopsy with AMR; 5 others showed diagnostic or possible subclinical AMR on a later protocol biopsy. One graft was lost, while remaining patients have normal or mildly elevated SCr 8-45 months post-transplantation. However, the mean increase in CAN score (cg + ci + ct + cv) from those biopsies showing subclinical AMR to follow-up biopsies 335 +/- 248 (SD) days later was significantly greater (3.5 +/- 2.5 versus 1.0 +/- 2.0, p = 0.01) than that in 24 recipients of HLA-incompatible grafts with no AMR over a similar interval (360 +/- 117 days), suggesting that subclinical AMR may contribute to development of CAN.     

Peritubular capillary C4d staining in late acute renal allograft rejection – is it relevant?

Abstract: Background: In the early post-transplant period, renal allograft rejection with diffuse peritubular capillary (PTC) C4d deposition predicts poor graft survival. In the late post-transplant setting, that is, one or more yr after transplantation, the implication of diffuse PTC C4d deposition is still a topic of debate. The purpose of our study was to see if diffuse PTC C4d deposition, in late acute rejection (LAR), occurring more than one yr post-transplant, has any impact on graft survival and function. Methods: We selected cases, both cadaveric as well as living donor renal transplant recipients, in whom acute rejection with PTC C4d deposition was first detected after the first year post-transplant. Recipients with multiple acute rejection episodes during the first year post-transplant were excluded from the study. The first biopsy diagnosed with LAR was considered the index biopsy (n = 40). We formed two groups: group 1, C4d-positive LAR (n = 20), and group 2, C4d-negative LAR (n = 20). Groups were matched for maintenance and post-rejection immunosuppressive therapy, baseline serum creatinine levels before the time of the index biopsy, time from transplant to index biopsy, as well as chronic allograft damage index (CADI) score in the index biopsies. We compared the rate of graft loss, and the graft function of the surviving grafts at the end of the study period, as well as histologic parameters in the index biopsy specimens between the two groups. The mean follow-up period was 20 months. Results: No significant differences in the rate of graft loss or graft function were found between groups 1 and 2 at the end of the follow-up period. Histologically, PTC margination and transplant glomerulopathy were more common in the C4d-positive group, and this difference was statistically significant. There was no statistically significant difference in the degree of plasma cell infiltrates. Conclusions: Unlike in the acute setting, the presence or absence of PTC C4d staining in renal allografts with LAR may not have a predictive value regarding graft outcome.     

Endothelial C4d deposition is associated with inferior kidney allograft outcome independently of cellular rejection.

BACKGROUND: Capillary deposition of complement split product C4d has been suggested to be a valuable marker for humoral rejection. In this retrospective study we evaluated the clinical impact of C4d deposition in renal allografts with special emphasis on associations between C4d staining patterns and histological features of acute rejection. METHODS: One hundred and two allograft biopsies obtained from 61 kidney transplants (1-532 days after transplantation; median 14 days) were examined by immunohistochemistry on routine paraffin sections using a novel anti-C4d polyclonal antibody (C4dpAb). RESULTS: Fourty-two of 102 biopsies showed endothelial C4d deposits in peritubular capillaries (PTC). Histopathological analysis revealed a significantly lower frequency of positive C4d staining in biopsies with rather than in those without acute cellular rejection defined by the Banff grading schema (P<0.01). For clinical evaluation, patients were classified according to C4d staining in allografts (C4d(PTC) positive in at least one biopsy, n=31 vs C4d(PTC) negative in all biopsies, n=30). C4d(PTC) positive patients had significantly higher serum creatinine levels than C4d negative patients. Even in the absence of morphological evidence for rejection, differences in serum creatinine levels between C4d(PTC) positive and negative recipients were significant (6 months: 2.01+/-0.75 vs 1.41+/-0.27 mg/dl; 12 months: 1.95+/-0.60 vs 1.36+/- 0.34 mg/dl; 18 months: 1.98+/-0.50 vs 1.47+/-0.31 mg/dl; P<0.05). All patients with rejection resistant to conventional therapy (n=4) were in the C4d(PTC) positive subgroup. All recipients with panel reactive antibodies (PRA) >50% (n=8) were C4d(PTC) positive. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that endothelial C4d deposition is associated with inferior graft outcome. We provide evidence that this immunohistochemical finding and its clinical impact are not associated with morphological signs of cellular rejection.     

Detection of B lymphocytes (CD20+) in renal allograft biopsy specimens

Acute allograft rejection represents an important complication after transplantation with significant impact on long-term graft survival. The involvement and relevance of B lymphocytes in this process is still not clear. The aim of this study was to quantify in renal allograft biopsy specimens the number of cells positive for CD20, a specific marker for B lymphocytes. Immunohistochemical techniques using monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody was used on paraffin sections from 38 renal allograft biopsy specimens. The biopsy specimens were classified into 3 groups, according to clinical and histological criteria: normal kidney, acute rejection, and chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN). In the normal kidney, no CD20(+) cells were detected. In contrast, in all cases of acute rejection and CAN, there were CD20(+) cells. The CD20(+) cells occurred in the infiltrate in 2 distinct patterns: scattered or nodular. In cases of acute rejection, the number of CD20(+) cells was significantly higher than in CAN cases (137.0 +/- 57.2 vs 45.4 +/- 9.8 cells/mm(2); P < 0.05). The nodular pattern was observed in 4 of 11 cases (36%) in the acute rejection group, and in 4 of 20 cases (20%) in the CAN cohort. In the acute rejection group, the presence of B-cell clusters tender to be associated with a higher level of serum creatinine (3.7 +/- 1.8 mg/dL vs 2.8 +/- 0.1 mg/dL in the scattered pattern group; not significant [ns]). In conclusion, these preliminary results demonstrated B lymphocytes in cases of renal allograft dysfunction, which were more pronounced in acute allograft rejection. Further analyses are required to determine whether the detection of CD20(+) cells in renal allograft biopsy specimens can be used as a prognostic marker.     

C4d-positive acute humoral renal allograft rejection: rescue therapy by immunoadsorption in combination with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil

OBJECTIVE: We investigated the efficacy of immunoadsorption (IA) in combination with tacrolimus (FK506) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) rescue therapy for C4d-positive acute humoral rejection (AHR) of renal transplants. METHODS: Six of 185 cadaveric renal allograft recipients developed AHR at a mean of 4.8 +/- 0.8 days after the operation. C4d deposits were observed in peritubular capillaries (PTC) with accumulation of granulocytes. IA with staphylococcal protein A and FK506-MMF combination therapy were administered. RESULTS: After treatment with IA for 6.3 +/- 1.03 sessions combined with FK506 (0.14 to 0.16 mg.kg(-1).d(-1)) and MMF (1.5 g/d) therapy, renal function recovered in all the patients. The mean duration of treatment to a serum creatinine decrease was 14 +/- 2.9 days. The pre-IA panel reactive antibody reactivity (PRA) peaked at 50.2% +/- 6.1%, and was significantly reduced to 8.3% +/- 2.9% after IA. In four of six patients repeat allograft biopsy revealed a remission of AHR. With a mean follow-up of 18.8 +/- 5.46 months, patient and allograft survival are 100% and renal function remains stable with a mean serum creatinine of 1.2 +/- 0.22 mg/dL. CONCLUSION: The optimal treatment for alloantibody-mediated AHR remains uncertain. Our findings suggest that a therapeutic approach combining IA and FK506-MMF rescue improves the outcome of AHR.     

C4d staining of perioperative renal transplant biopsies

BACKGROUND: Deposition of C4d in peritubular capillaries (PTCs) has been shown to be a sensitive marker for antibody-mediated (humoral) rejection in renal transplant biopsies. Some studies also suggest that C4d in PTCs is specific for humoral rejection or, at least, for the presence of donor-specific antibodies. However, in other studies, PTC C4d deposits were noted in more than 40% of renal transplant biopsies performed for graft dysfunction and capillary C4d deposition in heart transplants may result from ischemic injury. METHODS: To test the specificity of C4d staining as a marker for acute humoral rejection ACR in renal allografts, indirect immunofluorescence using a monoclonal anti-C4d antibody and a fluorescein-isothiocyanate-conjugated secondary antibody was performed on cryostat sections of 90 renal transplant biopsies, including 35 pairs of preimplantation and 1-hr postreperfusion biopsies of the same graft, postreperfusion biopsies of 12 additional grafts, and 8 positive controls (biopsies with known C4d-positive AHR). Eighteen grafts were cadaveric, 17 grafts were liviing-related, and 12 grafts were living-unrelated (excluding controls). Included in these grafts were 13 grafts that developed AHR 3 to 34 days posttransplantation. RESULTS: Only 2 of 82 perioperative biopsies showed C4d staining in PTCs. Both perioperative biopsies were postreperfusion biopsies of grafts diagnosed with AHR 5 and 34 days posttransplantation, respectively, and, in each case, the recipient had been treated with plasmapheresis before transplantation because of a positive crossmatch (cytotoxic and flow cytometric) and continued to have a weakly positive flow crossmatch at the time of transplantation. In one biopsy, C4d staining was focal, and in the other biopsy, it was diffuse; in both biopsies, C4d staining was relatively mild (1+ on a 0-4+ scale). No C4d staining was noted on preimplantation biopsies of each graft. All biopsies that contained glomeruli showed linear capillary loop or blotchy mesangial staining, or both, which was similar in prereperfusion and postreperfusion biopsies. All positive controls showed diffuse C4d staining in PTCs.CONCLUSIONS: C4d staining in PTCs may be seen as early as 1 hr posttransplantation in some recipients with low levels of antidonor antibodies. However, this was not observed as a feature of ischemic or ischemia-reperfusion injury in perioperative renal transplant biopsies, including those of cadaveric grafts with cold ischemia times of as long as 41 hr.     

Peritubular capillary C4d deposition and renal outcome in post-transplant IgA nephropathy

BACKGROUNDS: Immunological staining of the transplanted kidney for C4d in peritubular capillaries (C4d(PTC)) has emerged as a useful method to detect antibody-mediated rejection in situ. In this retrospective study, we evaluated the prevalence of C4d(PTC) deposition in allograft renal biopsies diagnosed of IgA nephropathy (IgAN) and analysed its clinical significance. METHOD: Sixty-six biopsy specimens of post-transplant IgAN, which were obtained to evaluate azotemia and/or heavy proteinuria, were examined by immunohistochemical staining of the paraffin sections with polyclonal antibody for C4d. RESULTS: C4d was stained positively in peritubular capillaries in 16 (24%) of the 66 cases. The C4d(PTC)-negative (n=50) and C4d(PTC)-positive groups (n=16) were not different in recipient gender, age, donor age, type of donor (living vs. cadaveric), interval from transplantation to graft biopsy (41.6+/- 21.8 vs. 48.3+/-26.1 months) and post-biopsy follow-up period (60.3+/-23.3 vs. 56.9+/-25.4 months). During the follow-up period, 12 of 50 (24%) although the incidence of graft failure was not different by the C4d deposition in peritubular capillaries, intervals from renal biopsy to graft failure tended to be shorter in C4d(PTC)-positive cases than C4d(PTC)-negative cases. In Kaplan-Meier analysis, the renal allograft function of the C4d(PTC)-positive group deteriorated more rapidly than that of the C4d(PTC)-negative group (p<0.05). Histologically, the C4d(PTC)-positive group had findings suggestive of acute cellular rejection more commonly than the C4d(PTC)-negative group (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Evidence of humoral rejection, as demonstrated by C4d(PTC) deposition, was concurrently present in significant portions of post-transplant IgAN biopsy specimens and was associated with more rapid deterioration of renal function. These results suggest that C4d(PTC) positivity needs to be determined at the time of biopsy even in cases of post-transplant glomerulonephritis and immunosuppression may need to be modified accordingly.     

C4D Immunostaining in Surveillance Endomyocardial Biopsies From Well-Functioning Heart Allografts

Objective

The meaning of biopsy C4d detection in heart allografts without dysfunction or morphologic changes suggesting antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is not clear. The aim of this study was to search for an association between C4d detection in allograft biopsies of well-functioning hearts without changes suggestive of AMR, and clinical outcomes.

Methods

Endomyocardial protocol biopsies from 44 heart transplant patients with well-functioning grafts and without changes suggesting AMR were performed at 1 month and 1 year after transplantation and analyze the presence of C4d deposition using immunohistochemistry. Two-year follow-up was based on clinical parameters and echocardiographic information. Heart graft function was categorized as good vs. poor. The presence of C4d, using diverse schemes to graduate the extension of the deposition, was correlated with clinical graft outcomes.

Results

C4d deposition was observed in the capillary walls of 33 biopsies (37.5%; n = 25 patients; 56.8%). No biopsy had diffuse (>50%) immunostaining. Six patients presented with multifocal capillary C4d immunostaining in at least 1 biopsy. Capillary positivity for C4d (if focal or multifocal) showed no statistical association with cellular rejection or graft function. Perimyocytic C4d detection was neither associated with rejection nor graft outcome.

Conclusion

Our work failed to demonstrate an association between C4d detection in protocol biopsies of heart grafts and clinical outcomes. The clinical utility of C4d staining in solid organ transplantation may vary by organ. Our results suggest that C4d did not have clinical utility in surveillance biopsies of well-functioning heart grafts without morphological changes suggesting AMR.     

A retrospective study of plasma cell infiltrates in explanted renal allografts

Renal transplantation is the most effective therapy in end-stage renal disease. The prognosis for transplant survival is still determined by rejection. When plasma cells predominate in the cellular infiltrate of allografts in rejection, it is called plasma cell-rich rejection, which has a poor prognosis. To study the correlation between plasma cell infiltration and humoral rejection, and to explore whether the local plasma cells were involved in renal allograft loss we analyzed 40 explanted grafts and 20 specimens removed for other diseases. All specimens were embedded, deparaffined, and stained with hematoxylin eosin (HE) for analysis by immunohistochemistry (IH). Renal allograft rejection was classified according to the Banff 1997 criteria with examinations for C4d deposition and CD138 expression. Positive C4d staining was defined by linear endothelial C4d deposition in > or =25% of cortical peritubular capillaries. The specimens designated as CD138-positive demonstrated strong and diffuse staining characteristics; trace or rare CD138-positive were classified as negative. Our results showed that among 40 renal graft specimens, 17 cases were C4d-positive, 23 cases were CD138-positive, and 13 cases were C4d and CD138 double-positive, namely, 42.5%, 57.5%, and 32.5%, respectively. Among the double-positive cases, there were 2 patients with a diagnosis of acute cellular rejection, 1 with hyperacute rejection, and 10 with chronic humoral rejection. C4d deposition and CD138-positive plasma cell infiltrate were related by a Spearman analysis (r = 0.330; P = .038). In the control group, there was only 1 case showing C4d positive activities. These observations suggested that infiltrated plasma cells in the renal allograft probably participate in humoral rejection through local secretion of antibodies.     

Novel rescue therapy for C4d-positive acute humoral renal allograft rejection

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy of immunoadsorption (IA) in combination with tacrolimus (TAC) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) rescue therapy for C4d-positive acute humoral rejection (AHR) of renal transplants. METHODOLOGY: Six of 185 cadaveric renal allograft recipients transplanted at our institute developed AHR over a mean period of 4.8 +/- 0.8 d after operation. The ages ranged from 35 to 51 yr (mean 42.6 +/- 5.6 yr). C4d deposits in peritubular capillaries (PTC) and accumulation of granulocytes in PTC were observed. IA with staphylococcal protein A and TAC-MMF combination therapy were given. RESULTS: After subjected to IA for 6.3 +/- 1.03 sessions combined with TAC (0.14-0.16 mg/kg/d) and MMF (1.5 g/d) therapy, renal function recovered in all the patients. The mean duration of treatment when serum creatinine decreased was 14 +/- 2.9 d. The pre-IA panel reactive antibody reactivity was as high as 50.2 +/- 6.1%, and was significantly reduced to 8.3 +/- 2.9% after IA. Repeated allograft kidney biopsy in four of six patients revealed a favorable remission of AHR. With a mean follow-up of 18.8 +/- 5.46 months, patient and allograft survival are 100%, renal function remained stable with a mean serum creatinine of 1.2 +/- 0.22 mg/dL. CONCLUSION: The optimal treatment for alloantibody-mediated AHR remains undefined. Our findings suggest that a therapeutic approach combining IA and TAC-MMF rescue has excellence to improve the outcome of AHR.     

The fate of C4d positive kidney allografts lacking histological signs of acute rejection

BACKGROUND: C4d deposits in renal transplants are known to be an independent risk factor of graft failure. The current analysis evaluates the impact of C4d deposits on graft function and survival in renal transplants without morphological signs of rejection. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed diagnostic transplant biopsies performed due to allograft dysfunction from June 1994 to June 2001 at the University Hospital in Basel. STUDY GROUP: Grafts/patients with focal or diffuse positivity of C4d along peritubular capillaries; absence of morphological signs of acute cellular and/or humoral rejection; up to 3 year follow-up analysis post index biopsy. Patients treated with anti-rejection therapy or an increase in maintenance immunosuppression post biopsy (intervention group = IG) were compared to patients with unaltered immunosuppression (standard group = SG). RESULTS: Study group: 22 biopsies/patients out of 400 biopsies (5%) were included into the study, 17 in the SG and 5 in the IG. Patient survival (1-/3-years): SG: 100/94%, IG: 80/80%; graft survival censored for death (1-/3-years): SG: 82.5/68.8%, IG: 100/100%; serum creatinine (micromol/l) at index biopsy/1-year/3-years: SG: 221 +/- 70/231 +/- 103/245 +/- 124, IG: 217 +/- 100/143 +/- 28/177 +/- 55; acute rejection episodes within 1 year post index biopsy: SG: 4 (4 patients), IG: 1 (1 patient); all differences not significant. Lowest serum creatinine within 4 weeks post index biopsy (IG vs. SG): 108 +/- 25 vs. 181 +/- 61, p = 0.02. CONCLUSIONS: C4d positivity in kidney transplants lacking histological evidence of acute rejection is not associated with rapid functional graft deterioration, even in untreated cases. However, anti-rejection therapy results in the improvement of kidney function. Thus, even in grafts with normal histology, the detection of C4d in diagnostic biopsies can be interpreted as a sign of "smoldering" rejection that benefits from therapy.     

Sinusoidal C4d deposits in liver allografts indicate an antibody-mediated response: diagnostic considerations in the evaluation of liver allografts

There is a paucity of data concerning the correlation of complement component 4d (C4d) staining in liver allografts and antibody-mediated rejection. Data about the location and character of C4d deposits in native and allograft liver tissues are inconsistent. We performed C4d immunofluorescence (IF) on 141 fresh-frozen liver allograft biopsy samples and native livers, documented the pattern of C4d IF staining, and correlated the findings with the presence of donor-specific alloantibodies (DSAs). A linear/granular sinusoidal pattern of C4d IF was noted in 18 of 28 biopsy samples obtained after transplantation from patients with positive crossmatch and detectable donor-specific alloantibody (pos-XM/DSA) findings. None of the 59 tested biopsy samples from patients with negative crossmatch and detectable donor-specific alloantibody (neg-XM/DSA) findings were C4d-positive (P < 0.001). No significant association was found between pos-XM/DSA and C4d IF staining in other nonsinusoidal liver compartments. To compare the results of sinusoidal C4d staining with IF and 2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) techniques, C4d IHC was performed on 19 liver allograft biopsy samples in which a sinusoidal pattern of C4d IF had been noted. Sinusoidal C4d IHC findings were negative for 17 of the 19 biopsy samples; 2 showed weak and focal staining, and both patients had pos-XM/DSA findings. Portal vein endothelium staining was present in only 1 IF-stained biopsy sample (pos-XM/DSA) but in 11 IHC-stained biopsy samples (2 of the 11 samples had neg-XM/DSA findings). We conclude that sinusoidal C4d deposits detected by IF in frozen tissue samples from liver allograft recipients correlate with the presence of DSAs and an antibody-mediated alloresponse. These observations are similar to findings reported for other solid organ transplants and can provide relevant information for patient management. Further validation of IHC techniques for C4d detection in liver allograft tissue is required.     

肾移植一年后急性排斥反应时移植肾组织中C4d表达阳性的临床研究

目的 观察肾移植1年后发生急性排斥反应时移植肾组织中补体片段C4d的表达情况,分析其对移植肾功能及预后的影响.方法 选择肾移植时间超过1年,临床诊断为急性排斥反应并经病理穿刺活检证实的肾移植受者36例为研究对象.以第1例受者移植肾组织穿刺时间为观察起点(2006年3月),以此项研究结束时间为观察终点(2010年4月).应用C4d多克隆抗体对移植肾穿刺组织行免疫组织化学染色,检测C4d在移植肾组织中的表达情况;根据检测结果,分为C4d阳性组和阴性组,分析和比较两组在观察时间段内移植肾功能的变化及存活时间.结果 在36例受者的移植肾穿刺标本中,C4d阳性16例(44.4%),C4d阴性20例(55.6%);C4d阳性组和阴性组移植肾组织中嗜酸性粒细胞浸润数量分别为(9.4±4.5)个和(2.6±1.8)个,两组比较,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05).在观察时间段内,所有受者血清肌酐均有不同程度上升,但C4d阳性组上升幅度与C4d阴性组比较,差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05);C4d阳性组和C4d阴性组受者移植肾功能丧失率分别为31.3%(5/16)和30.0%(6/20),两组比较,差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05).C4d阳性组和C4d阴性组受者移植肾穿刺后的巾位存活时间分别为(19.3±5.3)个月和(22.5±7.4)个月,两组比较,差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05).结论 肾移植1年后发生急性排斥反应时,移植肾组织中C4d表达阳性对其功能及存活时间无明显影响.     

Diffuse C4d staining of peritubular capillaries in renal allograft following bamlanivimab therapy

Neutralizing monoclonal antibodies such as bamlanivimab emerged as promising agents in treating kidney transplant recipients with COVID-19. However, the impact of bamlanivimab on kidney allograft histology remains unknown. We report a case of a kidney transplant recipient who received bamlanivimab for COVID-19 with subsequent histologic findings of diffuse peritubular capillary C4d staining. A 33-year-old man with end-stage kidney disease secondary to hypertension who received an ABO compatible kidney from a living donor, presented for his 4-month protocol visit. He was diagnosed with COVID-19 44 days prior to his visit and had received bamlanivimab with an uneventful recovery. His 4-month surveillance biopsy showed diffuse C4d staining of the peritubular capillaries without other features of antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR). Donor-specific antibodies were negative on repeat evaluations. ABMR gene expression panel was negative. His creatinine was stable at 1.3 mg/dl, without albuminuria. Given the temporal relationship between bamlanivimab and our observations of diffuse C4d staining of the peritubular capillaries, we hypothesize that bamlanivimab might bind to angiotensin-converting enzyme 2, resulting in classical complement pathway and C4d deposition. We elected to closely monitor kidney function which has been stable at 6 months after the biopsy. In conclusion, diffuse C4d may present following bamlanivimab administration without any evidence of ABMR.     

C4D deposition and positive posttransplant crossmatch are not necessarily markers of antibody-mediated rejection in renal allograft recipients

The aim of the study was to search for serologic, immunopathologic, and morphologic evidence of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) among patients with acute renal allograft dysfunction. The study included 19 patients with episodes of acute rejection (ARE) within the first year after transplantation. All patients had negative crossmatch tests before transplantation. Patients underwent biopsy for histologic and C4d examinations. All patients were monitored for donor-specific HLA alloantibodies during the first posttransplant year. Complement-dependent cytotoxic crossmatches were performed with donor lymphocytes. In eight patients, the crossmatch test results changed to positive during ARE. In all biopsies except one with cortical infarction, we observed C4d staining (group 1). The biopsies of four patients showed histologic changes of AMR, and all of their grafts were lost. In one patient, cellular and vascular rejection (Banff II) were present; in two, Banff I; and in one, borderline lesions. These results were compared with 11 patients with ARE but negative posttransplant crossmatches and negative staining for C4d (group 2). The histologic findings in the biopsies of these patients were cellular interstitial and vascular rejection (Banff I and Banff II). With no features suggestive of AMR. During the first year after transplantation, the creatinine levels of group 1 patients, were significantly higher than group 2 patients. One-year graft survival was 50% in group 1 and 91% in group 2. CONCLUSIONS: C4d and a positive posttransplant crossmatch were not associated with histologic features of AMR in half of the ARE. Nevertheless, C4d deposition and positive posttransplant crossmatches correlated with allograft injury among renal transplant patients.     

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation, mixed chimerism, and tolerance in living related donor renal allograft recipients

OBJECTIVE: We designed a prospective, randomized, and controlled clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of achieving a mixed chimerism-associated tolerance protocol for recipients of living related donor (LRD) renal allografts. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-six consecutive patients were divided into two equal groups of 33 patients with end-stage renal disease. They were enrolled for transplantation after negative lymphocytotoxicity cross-matching (LCM). Both groups (treated [Tn] and control [Cn]) showed similar clinical and laboratory parameters and donor HLA match profiles. The Tn group underwent thymic transplantation of donor renal tissue, two donor-specific transfusions, low-intensity conditioning, and high-dose hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) before renal transplantation. The conditioning regimen included low-dose, target-specific irradiation (to abdominal and inguinal lymph nodes, bone marrow [BM] from thoracolumbar vertebrae and part of the pelvis on alternate days, 100 rad x 4), anti-T-cell antibodies (1.5 mg/kg body weight [BW]), cyclophosphamide (10 mg/kg BW x 2 consecutive days), and cyclosporine (CyA; >3 mg/kg BW/d). Unfractionated HSCT procured from the donor marrow was administered into the BM, portal and peripheral circulations, within 24 hours of achieving CD 4+/CD 8+ T-cell count less than 10% of normal. This infusion was supplemented with a dose of peripherally mobilized stem cells (mean total dose of 20 x 10(8) cells/kg recipient BW) administered peripherally. Renal transplantation was performed after negative LCM. Donor-specific cytotoxic antibodies were eliminated with intravenous immunoglobulins and plasmapheresis before renal transplantation. Mixed chimerism was evaluated before and after transplantation at monthly intervals in patients with donors of opposite gender by the FISH technique. Both groups received CyA and prednisolone for immunosuppression; Cn subjects also received mycophenolate mofetil/azathioprine. Rejection was treated with standard treatment. Immunosuppression was withdrawn 6 months after renal transplantation for patients with consistently positive chimerism. Clinical tolerance was defined as stable allograft function for more than 100 days without immunosuppression and confirmed by allograft biopsy. RESULTS: Over a mean follow-up of 210 days, all Tn patients showed stable allograft function with mean serum creatinines (SCr) of 1.20 mg/dL, no rejection/CMV infections/graft or patient loss. A low-level donor-specific cytotoxic antibody was observed in all Tn patients. The CyA toxicity was noted in 10 (30.3%) patients. Persistent mixed hematopoietic chimerism was seen in all 21 patients irrespective of donor-recipient HLA matching (mean 0.5% before and 1 +/- 0.3% after transplantation). All four patients on drug withdrawal have shown donor-specific tolerance at a mean follow-up of 129.8 days. Other Tn patients are in the process of being weaned off immunosuppression. Mean SCr of controls was 1.45 mg/dL over a mean follow-up of 216 days. Acute rejection was observed in 17 (51.5%) patients; no CMV infection/patient loss was noted and one (3.03%) graft was lost in controls. No patient was lost in controls. No graft-versus-host disease was observed in Tn patients. CONCLUSION: We have achieved mixed hematopoietic chimerism-associated tolerance with high-dose HSCT, intrathymic donor renal tissue transplantation, and minimal conditioning without any adverse effects.     

C4d Immunoreactivity of Intraoperative Zero-Hour Biopsy in Renal Allograft

C4d deposition in the peritubular capillaries is known to be correlated with antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in renal allografts. An intraoperative zero-hour biopsy during transplantation is considered an indicator to indirectly determine the status of the donor kidney. In this study, we investigated the relationship between C4d immunoreactivity of intraoperative zero-hour biopsy in renal allograft, thought to be due to donor condition, and acute rejection episodes during follow-up. We collected 147 renal transplantation cases examining intraoperative zero-hour biopsy with C4d immunohistochemical staining. All cases were from the Seoul National University Hospital between 2010 and 2011. Of the 147 cases, 24 (16.3%) showed strong C4d staining in the glomeruli, 38 (25.9%) showed weak staining, and the remainder (57.8%) showed negative staining. Nine cases (6.1%) showed positive C4d staining in the arterioles, and the remainder (93.9%) were negative. There were no significant differences between acute T-cell-mediated rejection and acute AMR episodes in the renal allograft specimens during follow-up according to the glomerular or arteriolar C4d immunoreactivity of the intraoperative zero-hour biopsy specimens.     

Antagonizing leukotriene B4 receptors delays cardiac allograft rejection in mice

BACKGROUND: Allograft rejection is a cellular immunological/inflammatory response that is, in part, directed by potent proinflammatory mediators. This study was designed to test the hypothesis that leukotriene B4 (LTB4) may have a role in graft rejection and that LTB4 receptor antagonists may be clinically useful in the treatment of allograft rejection. METHODS: We evaluated the potent and selective LTB4 receptor antagonist CP-105696 in a murine heterotopic cardiac allograft model with oral dosing daily for 28 days or in an induction protocol (day -1 to day 3). RESULTS: At a dose of 50 mg/kg/day (28 days), B10.BR (H2k) allografts transplanted into C57Bl/6 (H2b) recipients were significantly protected, as reflected by the mean survival time versus control grafts (27+/-20 days [n=10] vs. 12+/-6 days [n=14]; P=0.0146). Using an induction protocol (day -1 to day 3), CP-105696 at 100 mg/kg/day significantly prolonged allograft survival (33+/-23 days [n=9]; P=0.0026), but CP-105696 at 10 mg/kg/day did not (18+/-16 days [n=8]; P=0.1433). Syngeneic grafts survived indefinitely (n=11). Immunohistological evaluation of allografts at rejection revealed a mononuclear cell infiltrate composed primarily of CD3+ and CD11b+ (Mac-1+) cells, which were infrequent in syngeneic grafts. Allografts from mice treated with CP-105696 at 50 or 100 mg/kg/day demonstrated a selective reduction in beta2-integrin (Mac-1) expression on monocytes/macrophages, as demonstrated by CD11b staining density compared with allograft controls. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that LTB4 or other potential ligands for LTB4 receptors may be important mediators of allograft rejection and support the clinical evaluation of LTB4 receptor antagonists in human organ transplantation.     

Significance of C4d deposition in the diagnosis of rejection after liver transplantation

C4d immunohistochemical staining of liver allograft biopsies was performed to assess its relationship to other pathological changes in the liver. C4d deposition was detected in 69.2% of liver graft biopsies from patients under going rejection, 33.3% of liver graft biopsies from patients with hepatitis B relapse after transplantation, and 28.6% of liver biopsies from patients with hepatitis B. When rejection occurred C4d deposition was located in the vascular walls of portal areas and hepatic sinusoidal walls. Examination of biopsies from patients with hepatitis B relapse after transplantation or hepatitis B infection showed C4d deposition only in the vascular walls of the portal area. C4d deposition in both vascular walls of portal area and hepatic sinusoidal walls was detected in only one of 12 ischemia-reperfusion damage cases. Repeated biopsy of the same patient 1 month later revealed acute cellular rejection. No C4d deposition was found in biopsies from a patient with bile duct occlusion after liver transplantation. C4d might serve as a sensitive marker for the diagnosis of liver rejection.     

Treatment of C4d-positive acute humoral rejection with plasmapheresis and rabbit polyclonal antithymocyte globulin

BACKGROUND: Alloantibody-mediated acute rejection is a major cause of renal allograft loss despite aggressive therapy. Patients with humoral rejection can be identified with high sensitivity and specificity by the presence of peritubular capillary C4d staining on renal biopsy and donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies. Standard therapy for acute humoral rejection (AHR) has been removal of donor-specific antibodies by plasmapheresis (PPH) in conjunction with intravenous immunoglobulin therapy. We describe a series of seven patients with C4d positive AHR who received combined therapy with PPH and polyclonal rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG). METHODS: PPH (1.4 volume exchange) was initiated on diagnosis of AHR on an alternate day basis for a mean number of 6.8 treatments, in conjunction with rATG (0.75 mg/kg/day 5-10 days) until the serum creatinine returned to 120% of nadir. RESULTS: The nadir posttreatment creatinine was significantly lower than pretreatment creatinine (1.0+/-1.2 vs. 2+/-1.4, P <0.007) with only one episode of graft loss. On follow-up there was no difference in renal allograft survival between the AHR group and the 60 patients without AHR who underwent transplantation during the same period. We describe the ability of rATG to induce apoptosis in vitro peripheral blood and activated B cells. CONCLUSION: Combination therapy using PPH and rATG is an effective means of reversing AHR in renal allografts.