Skeletal sites for osteoporosis diagnosis: the 2005 ISCD Official Positions.

The International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) has developed Official Positions to assist healthcare providers in addressing some of the issues inherent with the use of bone mineral density (BMD) assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) to diagnose osteoporosis, apply World Health Organization (WHO) T-score classifications, and monitor BMD changes over time. Differences exist, however, between the ISCD Official Position statement and that of the International Osteoporosis Foundation with respect to WHO criteria for skeletal sites. Consequently, a subcommittee of the ISCD was directed to address the application of the WHO classifications to specific skeletal sites and regions of interest. In 2005, the ISCD Position Development Conference reviewed the findings and prepared Official Positions, which address whether or not: (1) the lowest T-score of the total proximal femur, femoral neck, trochanter, and spine should continue to be used for diagnosis; (2) the WHO classification may be applied to a single vertebral body T-score; and (3) the ISCD should endorse the use of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey database for proximal femur T-score derivation. The resulting ISCD Official Positions, with their corresponding rationales and evidence are provided here, as well as questions that will need to be addressed in the future.     

Executive Summary of the 2019 ISCD Position Development Conference on Monitoring Treatment,DXA Cross-calibration and Least Significant Change,Spinal Cord Injury,Peri-prosthetic and Orthopedic Bone Health,Transgender Medicine,and Pediatrics

To answer important questions in the fields of monitoring with densitometry, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry machine cross-calibration, monitoring, spinal cord injury, periprosthetic and orthopedic bone health, transgender medicine, and pediatric bone health, the International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) held a Position Development Conference from March 20 to 23, 2019. Potential topics requiring guidance were solicited from ISCD members in 2017. Following that, a steering committee selected, prioritized, and grouped topics into Task Forces. Chairs for each Task Force were appointed and the members were co-opted from suggestions by the Steering Committee and Task Force Chairs. The Task Forces developed key questions, performed literature searches, and came up with proposed initial positions with substantiating draft publications, with support from the Steering Committee. An invited Panel of Experts first performed a review of draft positions using a modified RAND Appropriateness Method with voting for appropriateness. Draft positions deemed appropriate were further edited and presented at the Position Development Conference meeting in an open forum. A second round of voting occurred after discussions to approve or reject the positions. Finally, a face-to-face closed session with experts and Task Force Chairs, and subsequent electronic follow-up resulted in 34 Official Positions of the ISCD approved by the ISCD Board on May 28, 2019. The Official Positions and the supporting evidence were submitted for publication on July 1, 2019. This paper provides a summary of the all the ISCD Adult and Pediatric Official Positions, with the new 2019 positions highlighted in bold.     

Cross-calibration,Least Significant Change and Quality Assurance in Multiple Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry Scanner Environments: 2019 ISCD Official Position

In preparation for the International Society for Clinical Densitometry Position Development Conference (PDC) 2019 in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, a cross-calibration and precision task force was assembled and tasked to review the literature, summarize the findings, and generate positions to answer 4 related questions provided by the PDC Steering Committee, which expand upon the current ISCD official positions on these subjects. (1) How should a provider with multiple dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanners of the same make and model calculate least significant change (LSC)? (2) How should a provider with multiple DXA systems with the same manufacturer but different models calculate LSC? (3) How should a provider with multiple DXA systems from different manufacturers and models calculate LSC? (4) Are there specific phantom procedures that one can use to provide trustworthy in vitro cross calibration for same models, different models, and different makes? Based on task force deliberations and the resulting systematic literature reviews, 3 new positions were developed to address these more complex scenarios not addressed by current official positions on single scanner cross calibration and LSC. These new positions provide appropriate guidance to large multiple DXA scanner providers wishing to offer patients flexibility and convenience, and clearly define good clinical practice requirements to that end.     

Executive Summary of the 2013 International Society for Clinical Densitometry Position Development Conference on Body Composition

There have been many scientific advances in measurement of fat and lean body mass as determined by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) convened a Position Development Conference (PDC) on the use of DXA for body composition measurement. Previously, no guidelines to the use of DXA for body composition existed. The recommendations pertain to clinically relevant issues regarding DXA indications of use, acquisition, analysis, quality control, interpretation, and reporting were addressed. The topics and questions for consideration were developed by the ISCD Board of Directors and the Scientific Advisory Committee and were designed to address the needs of clinical practitioners. Three Task Forces were created and assigned these questions and asked to conduct comprehensive literature reviews. The Task Forces included participants from 6 countries and a variety of interests including academic institutions, private clinics, and industry. Reports with proposed Position Statements were then presented to an international panel of experts with backgrounds in DXA and bone densitometry and a variety of fields that use body composition measures. The PDC was held in Tampa, FL, contemporaneously with the Annual Meeting of the ISCD, March 21 through March 23, 2013. This report describes the methodology of the 2013 ISCD Body Composition PDC and summarizes the results. Three separate articles in this issue will detail the rationale, discussion, and additional research topics for each question the Task Forces addressed.     

定量计算机断层扫描技术在成人骨质疏松管理中的临床应用：2015年国际临床骨密度学会官方共识（第三部分）

国际临床骨密度学会(International Society for Clinical Densitometry,ISCD)就无校准体模的计算机断层扫描（如来源于结肠成像术）的临床应用发布了新的官方立场,并提出机会性骨质疏松筛查技术。ISCD定量CT工作组综述了这些新技术临床应用的证据,并在2015年ISCD官方大会上提出一份报告和建议。该文将讨论与ISCD官方立场相关的支持证据、理论说明、争议和进一步研究建议,综述了统计参数映射方法的最新进展。     

Clinical use of quantitative computed tomography and peripheral quantitative computed tomography in the management of osteoporosis in adults: the 2007 ISCD Official Positions.

The International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) has developed Official Positions for the clinical use of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and non-DXA technologies. While only DXA can be used for diagnostic classification according to criteria established by the World Health Organization, DXA and some other technologies may predict fracture risk and be used to monitor skeletal changes over time. ISCD task forces reviewed the evidence for clinical applications of non-DXA techniques and presented reports with recommendations at the 2007 ISCD Position Development Conference. Here we present the ISCD Official Positions for quantitative computed tomography (QCT) and peripheral QCT (pQCT), with supporting medical evidence, rationale, controversy, and suggestions for further study. QCT is available for bone mineral density measurements at the spine, hip, forearm, and tibia. The ISCD Official Positions presented here focus on QCT of the spine and pQCT of the forearm. Measurements at the hip may have clinical relevance, as this is an important fracture site; however, due to limited medical evidence, definitive advice on its use in clinical practice cannot be provided until more data emerge.     

Executive Summary of the 2013 International Society for Clinical Densitometry Position Development Conference on Bone Densitometry

The International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) convenes a Position Development Conference (PDC) every 2–3 yr to make recommendations for guidelines and standards in the field of musculoskeletal measurement and assessment. The recommendations pertain to clinically relevant issues regarding the acquisition, quality control, interpretation, and reporting of various aspects of musculoskeletal health metrics. Topics for consideration are developed by the ISCD Board of Directors and the Scientific Advisory Committee. For the 2013 PDC, body composition analysis was a central topic area for the first time and considered timely because of the scientific advances in measurement of fat and lean body mass by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Indications for DXA and vertebral fracture assessment and use of reference data to calculate bone mineral density T-scores were also updated. Task Forces for each of these areas were assigned questions of relevance to a clinical audience and asked to conduct comprehensive literature reviews. Reports with proposed Position Statements were then presented to an international panel of experts. The Expert Panel included representatives of the International Osteoporosis Foundation, the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research, the National Osteoporosis Foundation, Osteoporosis Canada, and the North American Menopause Society. The PDC was held in Tampa, FL, contemporaneously with the Annual Meeting of the ISCD, March 21 through March 23, 2013. This report describes the methodology of the 2013 ISCD PDC and summarizes the results of the 2013 ISCD PDC for vertebral fracture assessment/DXA and National Health and Nutrition Survey (NHANES) Reference Database Task Forces. A separate article in this issue will summarize the results of the Body Composition Analysis Task Forces.     

Screening for Atypical Femur Fractures Using Extended Femur Scans by DXA

Atypical femur fractures (AFFs) are a rare but serious complication associated with the use of antiresorptive drugs such as bisphosphonates. Assessment of incomplete AFFs on extended femur scans by dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry (DXA) may prevent the development of complete fractures. The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential of extended femur scans by DXA as a screening tool for incomplete AFFs. From June 2014 until September 2016, extended femur scans were routinely performed in all consecutive patients undergoing DXA scanning who had used bisphosphonates or denosumab at any given moment in the previous year. When “beaking” was found, defined as a localized periosteal or endosteal thickening of the lateral cortex, a radiograph of the femur was performed to confirm incomplete AFF. Beaking was detected in 12 of 282 patients (4.3%) with extended scans of both femora. In 9 patients (3.2%), beaking corresponded with the radiological presence of incomplete AFFs, of whom 4 already had an X‐ray made because of a previous complete AFF of the other leg. Five patients (1.8%) were newly diagnosed with 6 yet unknown incomplete AFFs. No additional X‐ray was performed in 2 patients because of loss of follow‐up. Beaking was explained by known soft tissue calcifications in 1 patient. The positive predictive value of beaking on extended femur scan was 83.3% in our study. Three cases in whom the new diagnosis of incomplete AFF has affected medical and surgical treatment are further discussed to illustrate the relevance of early detection. We conclude that extended femur scans by DXA can detect incomplete AFFs in patients on antiresorptive treatment and should therefore be considered a clinically relevant screening tool because early identification of AFFs has therapeutic consequences. © 2017 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.     

Official Positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry and executive summary of the 2007 ISCD Position Development Conference.

The International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) convenes a Position Development Conference (PDC) every 2 yr to make recommendations for standards in the field of bone densitometry. The recommendations are based on clinically relevant issues in bone densitometry such as quality control, acquisition, analysis, interpretation and reporting. Topics for consideration are developed by the ISCD Board of Directors and its Scientific Advisory Committee. Clinically relevant questions related to each topic area are assigned to task forces for a comprehensive review of the medical literature and subsequent presentation of the reports to an international panel of experts. For this PDC, the Expert Panel included representatives of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research, International Bone and Mineral Society and the National Osteoporosis Foundation. The recommendations of the PDC Expert Panel are then reviewed by the ISCD Board of Directors. Recommendations that are approved become Official Positions of the ISCD. The most recent PDC was held July 20-22, 2007, in Lansdowne, Virginia, USA. Topics considered included vertebral fracture assessment, technical and clinical issues relevant to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), and bone densitometry technologies other than central DXA. This report describes the methodology and the results of the Lansdowne, Virginia, USA 2007 PDC, and a summary of all ISCD Official Positions, including the ones recently adopted by this PDC and the 2007 Pediatric PDC held in Montreal, Quebec, Canada.     

髋部定量CT（QCT）骨质疏松防治管理临床应用：2015 ISCD共识--部分Ⅰ摘录

国际临床骨密度测量学会(ISCD)发布了髋部定量CT(QCT)临床应用的最新共识。ISCD致力于汇总归纳定量CT的临床应用证据并在2015年ISCD指南修订会议上发布共识指南报告,讨论并一致通过了关于支持医学应用的证据、依据和矛盾,以及未来研究建议的共识。     

Incomplete Atypical Femoral Fractures: Assessing the Diagnostic Utility of DXA by Extending Femur Length

Atypical femoral fractures (AFFs) are associated with prolonged bisphosphonate therapy. A feature of incomplete AFF is a localized periosteal reaction. It has been suggested that extending the length of the femur image at the time of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) may diagnose an incomplete AFF. In patients older than 50 yr on bisphosphonate therapy for more than 5 yr, we extended femur length at the time of routine DXA. Abnormal DXA images were suggested in 19 of 257 patients (7.4%). On X-ray, 7 patients (2.7%) showed no abnormality, 7 patients (2.7%) showed evidence of AFF, and 5 patients (2.0%) showed an unrelated radiographic abnormality. Of the 7 cases with X-ray evidence of AFF, 5 had a periosteal flare and 2 had a visible fracture line, both of whom needed insertion of an intramedullary nail. We demonstrated that it is feasible to detect incomplete AFF early using extended femur length imaging with a prevalence in our sample of 2.7% (95% confidence interval: 1.7%–3.7%).     

DXA与QCT预测骨折风险的进展：非骨密度测量指标

骨折风险的预测指标除了骨密度(BMD)之外还有很多进展。国际临床骨密度学会(ISCD)于2015年就DXA与QCT非BMD测量在预测骨折危险性方面的应用,包括骨小梁评分数(TBS)和髋关节几何测量的专题召开了共识研讨会。此外,定量计算机断层扫描(QCT)分析的新进展包括有限元分析、髋关节QCT、髋关节类DXA测量和随机筛查没有包含在ISCD以前的共识内。本次会上讨论的主题由ISCD理事会和科学咨询委员会提出,旨在解决临床实际需求。骨密度测量领域的国际专家小组对专题工作组提交的报告进行了审核。本文为共识研讨会会议总结。     

Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry Reports Fail to Adhere to International Guidelines

Introduction: Bone mineral density, measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), is the gold standard for diagnosis of osteoporosis. The utility of DXA relies on the accuracy of scan acquisition, interpretation of data, and the adequacy of reports. The International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) has published guidelines regarding minimum reporting guidelines. This study assessed whether DXA reports for patients receiving care at an academic teaching hospital adhere to these reporting standards, and determine whether differences exist depending on patient factors and the imaging service. Methods: Patients aged ≥18 years, receiving care at specialist outpatient clinics between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2019, with a DXA report available, were eligible for inclusion. DXA reports were manually reviewed for adherence to ISCD guidelines, with each criterion scored as one point, giving a total score of 14 for baseline DXA scans and 18 for repeat DXA scans. The score was then converted to a percentage. Results: Of 459 DXA scans included, 214 were performed internally at our hospital and 245 performed at 23 external imaging services. Mean (SD) patient age was 60 (16.3) years, and 75.8% were female. The overall median (IQR) report score was 57.1% (42.9, 82.4). ISCD criteria with the lowest scores were recommendation and timing of future DXA scans (included in 1.1% of reports) and investigation for secondary causes of osteoporosis (included in 1.2% of reports). Reports performed internally had significantly higher scores than those performed externally, after adjusting for age, sex, indication, and type of scan (incidence rate ratio 1.83, 95% confidence interval 1.77, 1.89). Baseline DXA reports had slightly higher scores than repeat DXA scans, and, among external imaging services, rural services had higher scores than metropolitan services. Conclusion: This study, the largest comprehensive evaluation of DXA reports, highlights significant deficiencies and variation in report standards between imaging services. This has potential implications for osteoporosis diagnosis and management.     

DXA Scan Variants in Transgender Patients

Transgender and gender non-conforming (TGNC) individuals face numerous barriers to healthcare, which contribute to many health disparities. TGNC persons may choose gender-affirming therapies with surgery and/or hormone replacement therapy (HRT) to manage gender incongruence. Despite the expanding use of HRT, the long-term outcomes on bone health and metabolism, are still relatively unknown in the TGNC population. In 2019, the International Society of Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) released an official position statement on the appropriate use of dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) to measure bone density in the TGNC population. In this study, we reviewed which “sex” is currently utilized among providers when performing DXA scans to calculate T- and Z-scores for TGNC persons and how this compares to the positions published by the ISCD. A retrospective analysis was performed utilizing HERON queries and subsequent chart review. HERON is a type of Informatics for Integrating Biology and the Bedside software that was utilized to find sets of patients of interest from electronic medical record data while preserving patient privacy through a query interface tool. Project specific sets including patient demographics, medications, gonadectomy, and DXA scan information was created in HERON to make this highly detailed data of specific patients available to the investigators on the platform, as reviewed and retrieved by the Institutional Review Board. The qualitative DXA data obtained from chart review was determined as "correct" or "incorrect" based on positions provided from the ISCD. 10 DXA scans that met inclusion criteria were obtained between 9 TGNC patients. In total, 18 T-scores and Z-scores of the 10 DXAs were reviewed and scored. Based on ISCD positions, 67% of the T-score and Z-scores were calculated incorrectly; using the erroneous “sex” based standard to compare scores. Like DXA scans, many current healthcare standards and protocols are based on a patient's sex or gender, which may cause confusion amongst healthcare personnel who have not received proper training regarding the TGNC population. In this study, 67% of T-scores and Z-scores were calculated incorrectly based on ISCD recommendations. An additional prospective research design is required to determine the consequences of incorrectly calculated DXA scans for TGNC patients. Furthermore, future research is needed to determine HRT's effects on bone mineral density in the TGNC population in the United States.     

Official positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry.

The International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) has convened two Position Development Conferences at which a panel of experts agreed on recommendations for performance and clinical applications of bone density testing. These recommendation were reviewed by the ISCD Board of Directors, and those approved by the board are now official positions of the ISCD. These include (1) indications for bone density testing, (2) reference databases for T-scores, (3) standards for performing central dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) for diagnosis, (4) interpretation of peripheral bone density results, (5) diagnosis of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women, (6) diagnosis of osteoporosis in men, (7) diagnosis in premenopausal women, (8) diagnosis in children, (9) indications and interpretation for serial bone mass measurement, (10) technical standards for phantom scanning and calibration, (11) technical standards for cross-calibration of DXAsystems, and (12) standards for reporting of bone density results including correct nomenclature and preferred number of decimal digits.     

2013 Pediatric Position Development Conference: Executive Summary and Reflections

The International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) convened its second Pediatric Position Development Conference (PDC) on October 2–3, 2013 in Baltimore, MD. The conference was co-sponsored by the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR) and was held immediately before their annual meeting. The aim of a PDC is to make recommendations for standards in the field of bone densitometry. The recommendations address issues such as quality control, data acquisition and analysis, and the interpretation and reporting of bone densitometric results. In 2007, ISCD convened its first Pediatric PDC to address issues specific to skeletal health assessments in children and adolescents. The 2013 Pediatric PDC focused on advances in the field since that initial conference that would lead to revisions of the original positions. Topics for consideration were developed by the ISCD and its Scientific Advisory Committee. Clinically relevant questions related to each topic were assigned to task forces for a comprehensive review of the medical literature and subsequent presentation of reports to an international panel of experts. Expert panelists included representatives from both the ISCD and ASBMR. The recommendations of the PDC Expert Panel were subsequently reviewed by the ISCD Board of Directors and positions accepted by majority vote. The approved recommendations became the Official Positions of the ISCD. The positions are to be submitted to the ASBMR for its consideration for endorsement. Topics considered at the Pediatric PDC included fracture prediction and definition of osteoporosis, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry assessment in chronic diseases that may affect the skeleton, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry interpretation and reporting, quantitative computed tomography measurements, and densitometry in infants and young children. We discuss potential implications of the new recommendations and factors leading to a change in the wording of these positions, considering the science that has evolved over the past 6 yr.     

Peripheral dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in the management of osteoporosis: the 2007 ISCD Official Positions.

Peripheral assessment of bone density using photon absorptiometry techniques has been available for over 40 yr. The initial use of radio-isotopes as the photon source has been replaced by the use of X-ray technology. A wide variety of models of single- or dual-energy X-ray measurement tools have been made available for purchase, although not all are still commercially available. The Official Positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) have been developed following a systematic review of the literature by an ISCD task force and a subsequent Position Development Conference. These cover the technological diversity among peripheral dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (pDXA) devices; define whether pDXA can be used for fracture risk assessment and/or to diagnose osteoporosis; examine whether pDXA can be used to initiate treatment and/or monitor treatment; provide recommendations for pDXA reporting; and review quality assurance and quality control necessary for effective use of pDXA.     

Repeating Measurement of Bone Mineral Density when Monitoring with Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry: 2019 ISCD Official Position

Bone mineral density (BMD) can be measured at multiple skeletal sites using various technologies to aid clinical decision-making in bone and mineral disorders. BMD by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) has a critical role in predicting risk of fracture, diagnosis of osteoporosis, and monitoring patients. In clinical practice, DXA remains the most available and best validated tool for monitoring patients. A quality baseline DXA scan is essential for comparison with all subsequent scans. Monitoring patients with serial measurements requires technical expertise and knowledge of the least significant change in order to determine when follow-up scans should be repeated. Prior ISCD Official Positions have clarified how and when repeat DXA is useful as well as the interpretation of results. The 2019 ISCD Official Positions considered new evidence and clarifies if and when BMD should be repeated. There is good evidence showing that repeat BMD measurement can identify people who experience bone loss, which is an independent predictor of fracture risk. There is good evidence showing that the reduction in spine and hip fractures with osteoporosis medication is proportional to the change in BMD with treatment. There is evidence that measuring BMD is useful following discontinuation of osteoporosis treatment. There is less documentation addressing the effectiveness of monitoring BMD to improve medication adherence, whether monitoring of BMD reduces the risk of fracture, or effectively discriminates patients who should and should not recommence treatment following an interruption of medication. Further research is needed in all of these areas.     

Bone Densitometry in Infants and Young Children: The 2013 ISCD Pediatric Official Positions

Infants and children <5 yr were not included in the 2007 International Society for Clinical Densitometry Official Positions regarding Skeletal Health Assessment of Children and Adolescents. To advance clinical care of very young children, the International Society for Clinical Densitometry 2013 Position Development Conference reviewed the literature addressing appropriate methods and skeletal sites for clinical dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurements in infants and young children and how results should be reported. DXA whole-body bone mineral content and bone mineral density for children ≥3 yr and DXA lumbar spine measurements for infants and young children 0–5 yr were identified as feasible and reproducible. There was insufficient information regarding methodology, reproducibility, and reference data to recommended forearm and femur measurements at this time. Appropriate methods to account for growth delay when interpreting DXA results for children <5 yr are currently unknown. Reference data for children 0–5 yr at multiple skeletal sites are insufficient and are needed to enable interpretation of DXA measurements. Given the current scarcity of evidence in many areas, it is likely that these positions will change over time as new data become available.     

The Official Positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry: Acquisition of Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Body Composition and Considerations Regarding Analysis and Repeatability of Measures

In preparation for the International Society for Clinical Densitometry Position Development Conference of 2013 in Tampa, Florida, Task Force 2 was created as 1 of 3 task forces in the area of body composition assessment by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The assignment was to review the literature, summarize the relevant findings, and formulate positions covering (1) accuracy and precision assessment, (2) acquisition of DXA body composition measures in patients, and (3) considerations regarding analysis and repeatability of measures. There were 6 primary questions proposed to the task force by the International Society for Clinical Densitometry board and expert panel. Based on a series of systematic reviews, 14 new positions were developed, which are intended to augment and define good clinical practice in quantitative assessment of body composition by DXA.