No Advantage of Expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene and Fluorinated Ethylene Propylene–Covered Stents over Uncovered Nitinol Stents for Percutaneous Palliation of Malignant Infrahilar Biliary Obstruction: Results of a Single-Center Prospective Randomized Trial

PurposeTo prove that covered stents are more efficacious than uncovered stents regarding patency, safety, enabling of chemotherapy, and survival in percutaneous palliation of malignant infrahilar biliary obstruction.Materials and MethodsAfter failed endoscopic treatment, 154 patients with obstructive jaundice caused by unresectable infrahilar malignancy were randomly allocated to receive an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene and fluorinated ethylene propylene–covered or an uncovered nitinol stent. Occlusion rate, patency, and survival were assessed. Safety and clinical success in terms of chemotherapy were compared.ResultsThree patients were excluded post hoc. Fifteen patients died within 7 d and were excluded from patency analysis. Occlusion rates were 32% (21 of 66) for covered and 29% (20 of 70) for uncovered stents (P = .7). Estimated median patency durations were 308 d (95% confidence interval [CI], 178–438 d) for covered and 442 d (95% CI, 172–712 d) for uncovered stents (P = .1). Serious adverse events (P = 1.0) and 30-day mortality (P = .5) were equivalent between groups. At hospital discharge, median bilirubin reduction of 8 mg/dL was found in both groups (P < .001). In the covered stent group, 35 patients (48%) received palliative chemotherapy, vs 29 (37%) in the uncovered stent group (P = .2). Estimated median survival times were 96 days (95% CI, 68–124 d) with covered stents and 75 days (95% CI, 42–108 d) with uncovered stents (P = .6).ConclusionsIn malignant infrahilar biliary obstruction not amenable to endoscopy, no improvement in patency or survival with percutaneously placed covered stents could be confirmed. Covered and uncovered stent types exhibit similar safety profiles and clinical success rates.     

Outcomes of Preventive Embolization of the Inferior Mesenteric Artery during Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

PurposeTo evaluate the impact of preemptive inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) embolization on outcomes of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair (EVAR).Materials and MethodsFrom January 2015 to July 2017, all patients undergoing elective EVAR or fenestrated EVAR (F-EVAR) for asymptomatic AAA in a single tertiary hospital were retrospectively included. Three groups of patients were defined: patients with a patent IMA who underwent embolization during EVAR/F-EVAR (group 1), those with a patent IMA who did not undergo embolization during EVAR/F-EVAR (group 2), and those with a chronically occluded IMA (group 3). Preoperative aortic morphology, demographics, and procedural details were recorded. Aneurysmal growth (≥5 mm), reintervention, and overall mortality rates were analyzed using multivariate proportional hazard multivariate modeling. Propensity scores were constructed, and inverse probability weighting was applied to a new set of multivariate analyses to perform a sensitivity analysis.ResultsA total of 266 patients (male, 95% [n = 249]) with a median age of 70 (65–77) years were included, with F-EVAR procedures comprising 87 (32.7%) of the interventions. There were 52, 142, and 72 patients in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Changes in aneurysmal sac size did not differ between groups, nor did overall survival or reintervention rates at 24 months. IMA embolization was not identified as an independently protective factor for aneurysmal growth during follow-up (relative risk [RR] = 2.82/mm [0.96–8.28], P = .060), whereas accessory renal arteries (RR = 5.07/mm [1.72–14.96], P = .003) and a larger preoperative aneurysmal diameter (RR = 1.09/mm [1.03–1.15], P = .004) were independent risk factors for sac enlargement.ConclusionsPreventive embolization of the IMA during EVAR or F-EVAR did not promote aneurysmal sac shrinking or decrease the reintervention rate at 2-year follow-up.     

Diagnostic Performance of CT-Guided Bone Biopsies in Patients with Suspected Osteomyelitis of the Appendicular and Axial Skeleton with a Focus on Clinical and Technical Factors Associated with Positive Microbiology Culture Results

PurposeTo assess diagnostic performance of CT-guided percutaneous needle bone biopsy (CTNBB) in patients with suspected osteomyelitis and analyze whether certain clinical or technical factors were associated with positive microbiology results.Materials and MethodsAll CTNBBs performed in a single center for suspected osteomyelitis of the appendicular and axial skeleton during 2003–2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Specific inclusion criteria were clinical and radiologic suspicion of osteomyelitis. Standard of reference was defined using outcome of surgical histopathology and microbiology culture and clinical and imaging follow-up. Technical and clinical data (needle size, comorbidities, clinical factors, laboratory values, blood cultures) were collected. Logistic regression was performed to assess associations between technical and clinical data and microbiology biopsy outcome.ResultsA total of 142 CTNBBs were included (46.5% female patients; age ± SD 46.10 y ± 22.8), 72 (50.7%) from the appendicular skeleton and 70 (49.3%) from the axial skeleton. CTNBB showed a sensitivity of 42.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 32.0%–53.6%) in isolating the causative pathogen. A higher rate of positive microbiology results was found in patients with intravenous drug use (odds ratio [OR] = 5.15; 95% CI, 1.2–21.0; P = .022) and elevated white blood cell count ≥ 10 × 10⁹/L (OR = 3.9; 95% CI, 1.62–9.53; P = .002). Fever (≥ 38°C) was another clinical factor associated with positive microbiology results (OR = 3.6; 95% CI, 1.3–9.6; P = .011).ConclusionsCTNBB had a low sensitivity of 42.5% for isolating the causative pathogen. Rate of positive microbiology samples was significantly higher in patients with IV drug use, elevated white blood cell count, and fever.     

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Stage I Renal Cell Carcinoma: National Treatment Trends and Outcomes Compared to Partial Nephrectomy and Thermal Ablation

PurposeTo assess use of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for stage I renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and compare outcomes with thermal ablation and partial nephrectomy (PN).Materials and MethodsThe 2004–2015 National Cancer Database was investigated for histopathologically proven stage I RCC treated with PN, cryoablation, radiofrequency (RF) or microwave (MW) ablation, or SBRT. Patients were propensity score–matched to account for potential confounders, including patient age, sex, race, comorbidities, tumor size, histology, grade, tumor sequence, administration of systemic therapy, treatment in academic vs nonacademic centers, treatment location, and year of diagnosis. Overall survival (OS) was evaluated with Kaplan-Meier plots, log-rank tests, and Cox proportional hazards models.ResultsA total of 91,965 patients were identified (SBRT, n = 174; PN, n = 82,913; cryoablation, n = 5,446; RF/MW ablation, n = 3,432). Stage I patients who received SBRT tended to be older women with few comorbidities treated at nonacademic centers in New England states. After propensity score matching, a cohort of 636 patients was obtained with well-balanced confounders between treatment groups. In the matched cohort, OS after SBRT was inferior to OS after PN and thermal ablation (PN vs SBRT, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.29, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.19–0.46, P < .001; cryoablation vs SBRT, HR = 0.40, 95% CI 0.26–0.60, P < .001; RF/MW ablation vs SBRT, HR = 0.46, 95% CI 0.31–0.67, P < .001). Compared with PN, neither cryoablation nor RF/MW ablation showed significant difference in OS (cryoablation vs PN, HR = 1.35, 95% CI 0.80–2.28, P = .258; RF/MW ablation vs PN, HR = 0.64, 95% CI 0.95–2.55, P = .079).ConclusionsCurrent SBRT protocols show lower OS compared with thermal ablation and PN, whereas thermal ablation and PN demonstrate comparable outcomes.     

Impact of Body Mass Index on Perioperative Complications and Oncologic Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Thermal Ablation for Renal Cell Carcinoma

PurposeTo determine effect of body mass index (BMI) on safety and cancer-related outcomes of thermal ablation for renal cell carcinoma (RRC).Materials and MethodsThis retrospective study evaluated 427 patients (287 men and 140 women; mean [SD] age, 72 [12] y) who were treated with thermal ablation for RCC between October 2006 and December 2017. Patients were stratified by BMI into 3 categories: normal weight (18.5–24.9 kg/m²), overweight (25–29.9 kg/m²), and obese (≥ 30 kg/m²). Of 427 patients, 71 (16%) were normal weight, 157 (37%) were overweight, and 199 (47%) were obese. Complication rates, local recurrence, and residual disease were compared in the 3 cohorts.ResultsNo differences in technical success between normal-weight, overweight, and obese patients were identified (P = .72). Primary technique efficacy rates for normal-weight, overweight, and obese patients were 91%, 94%, and 93% (P = .71). There was no significant difference in RCC specific–free survival, disease-free survival, and metastasis-free survival between obese, overweight, and normal-weight groups (P = .72, P = .43, P = .99). Complication rates between the 3 cohorts were similar (normal weight 4%, overweight 2%, obese 3%; P = .71).ConclusionsCT-guided renal ablation is safe, feasible, and effective regardless of BMI.     

Transarterial Radioembolization versus Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Percutaneous Ablation for Unresectable,Solitary Hepatocellular Carcinoma of ≥3 cm: A Propensity Score–Matched Study

PurposeTo compare the safety and effectiveness of transarterial radioembolization (TARE) and transarterial chemoembolization with drug-eluting embolic agents combined with percutaneous ablation (transarterial chemoembolization [TACE] + ablation) in the treatment of treatment-naïve, unresectable, solitary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) of ≥3 cm.Materials and MethodsTwenty-nine patients with treatment-naïve, unresectable, solitary HCC of ≥3 cm received combined TACE + ablation, and 40 patients received TARE at a single institution. Local tumor response, tumor progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, need for reintervention, bridge to transplant, and major complications were compared. Clinical variables and outcomes were compared before and after propensity score matching (PSM).ResultsBefore PSM, patients who underwent TARE had a larger tumor size (3.7 vs 5.5 cm; P = .0005) and were older (61.5 vs 69.3 years; P = .0014). After PSM, there was no difference in baseline characteristics between the 2 groups, with the mean tumor sizes measuring 3.9 and 4.1 cm in the TACE + ablation and TARE cohorts, respectively. After PSM (n = 19 in each group), no statistically significant difference was observed in local radiological response (disease control rates, 100% vs 94.7%; P = .31), survival (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR], 0.71; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28–1.80; P = .469), PFS (SHR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.21–1.71; P = .342), bridge to transplant (21.1% vs 31.6%, P = .46), and major adverse event rates (15.8% vs 10.5%, P = .63) between the 2 groups. The mean total number of locoregional interventions was higher in the TACE + ablation cohort (1.9 vs 1.3 sessions, P = .02), with an earlier median reintervention trend (SHR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.20–1.32; P = .167).ConclusionsThe present study showed that TARE and the combination of TACE and ablation are comparable in safety and effectiveness for treating treatment-naïve, unresectable, solitary HCC of ≥3 cm.     

Partial Nephrectomy versus Percutaneous Cryoablation of Small Renal Cell Carcinomas: A Comparison of Adverse Events in a Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study

PurposeTo assess and compare complications and readmissions after partial nephrectomy and percutaneous cryoablation of cT1 renal cell carcinoma (RCC).Materials and MethodsPatients treated for cT1 RCC between 2019 and 2021 were prospectively and consecutively enrolled. Complications recorded within 30 and 90 days were graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification, and percutaneous cryoablation was graded according to the Society of Interventional Radiology classification of adverse events. Major complications were defined as complications with a grade of ≥3 based on the Clavien-Dindo classification. Readmission within 30 days was recorded.ResultsThe cohort included 86 partial nephrectomies and 104 cryoablations. The complication rate within 90 days was 23% after partial nephrectomy and cryoablation (P = .98), with major complication rates of 3% after partial nephrectomy and 10% after cryoablation (P = .15). The readmission rates were 14% and 11% after partial nephrectomy and cryoablation, respectively (P = .48). Double-J stents were associated with overall complications (odds ratio [OR], 9.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.18–44.68; P = .003) and readmissions (OR, 5.39; 95% CI, 1.37–21.06; P = .015) after cryoablation. A high versus low radius-endophytic-nearness-anterior-location score (OR, 5.86; 95% CI, 1.08–31.81; P = .040) and endophytic location (OR, 7.70; 95% CI, 1.72–34.50; P = .008) were associated with a higher complication rate after cryoablation. The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was associated with major complications after partial nephrectomy (OR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.05–4.30; P = .036).ConclusionsPartial nephrectomy and cryoablation are comparable regarding complications within 90 days after treatment. Tumor complexity and double-J stents were associated with complications after cryoablation, and a high CCI was associated with complications after partial nephrectomy.     

Prognostic Factors for Local Recurrence after Cryoablation of Desmoid Tumors

PurposeTo determine the risk factors for local of adult patients treated for desmoid tumors by cryoablation.Materials and MethodsEighty-four patients treated for nonabdominopelvic desmoid tumors by cryoablation from July 2012 to July 2020 were included in a retrospective study. The population was composed of 64 women (76.19%) and 20 men (23.81%), aged from 16 to 75 years (median, 35 years ± 14.25). Each patient underwent preprocedural gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and was followed up to 36 months with the same technique. Clinical features, such as tumor size and previous treatment, epidemiological features, and the technical parameters of cryoablation, were studied.ResultsLocal relapse was found in 19 (22.62%) of 84 patients. The 12-, 24-, and 36-month progression-free survival rates were 89% (95% confidence interval [CI], 79–94), 74% (95% CI, 60–83), and 68% (95% CI, 53–79), respectively. In univariate analysis, significant prognostic factors associated with local recurrence were non–abdominal wall location (P = .042), debulking strategy (P = .0105), risk of visceral injury (P = .034) or peripheral nerve injury during cryoablation (P = .033), previous radiation therapy (P = .043), and treatment before 2016 (P = .008). In multivariate analysis, abdominal wall tumors displayed the best outcome, whereas the neck and trunk showed a high rate of recurrence (hazard ratio, 7.307 [95% CI, 1.396–38.261]).ConclusionsThe local recurrence of desmoid tumors after cryoablation depends on a number of prognostic factors, in particular, a non–abdominal wall location of the tumor and previous local treatment such as surgery or radiation therapy.     

Photodynamic therapy during second surgery for recurrent gliomas improves survival

BackgroundGlioma accounts for most central nervous system tumors, and the degree of invasion and malignancy are higher in the recurrent glioma. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is an effective strategy in glioma. This study aimed to explore the risk factors for re-recurrence after a second glioma surgery and the effects of PDT on re-recurrence.MethodsThis was a retrospective study in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University in China, and 43 patients that received the secondary surgery for recurrent glioma were included. The Kaplan-Meier test and Cox proportional hazard method were used to analyze.ResultsThe total re-recurrence rate after the second surgery for recurrent glioma was 48.84%. When the age increased by 1, the risk of re-recurrence increased 1.065 times (95% CI 1.000–1.134, P = 0.049). High matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) 2 expression was associated with a significantly higher risk of re-recurrence than low MMP2 expression (HR = 25.550, 95% CI 3.190–204.650, P = 0.002). Pathological grades IV and III were associated with a significantly higher risk of re-recurrence than pathological grade II (HR = 17.121, 95% CI 2.345–124.986, P = 0.005; HR = 2863.470, 95% CI 100.697–81,427.197, P < 0.001). PDT decreased the risk of re-recurrence (HR = 25.550, 95% CI 3.190–204.650, P = 0.002) and increased survival time (HR = 3.611, 95% CI 1.012–12.888, P = 0.048).ConclusionThe age, MMP2 expression, and pathological grade are independent risk factors for re-recurrence after a second surgery for recurrent glioma. PDT during the second surgery decreased the risk of re-recurrence and increased survival time.     

γ-Glutamyltranspeptidase as a Prognostic Biomarker in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Transarterial Chemoembolization

PurposeTo evaluate the prognostic value of pretreatment serum γ-glutamyltransferase (GGT) level in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) receiving transarterial chemoembolization.Materials and MethodsThis retrospective study included 140 patients (123 male, 17 female; mean age, 56.9 y ± 12.0; range, 22.0–82.0 y) with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer class C HCC who received first-line conventional chemoembolization between December 2013 and March 2018. Patients were divided into low and high GGT groups based on a cutoff value calculated with a receiver operating characteristic curve. Overall survival (OS) was compared between groups by log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were performed.ResultsThe optimal cutoff values of GGT were 119.5 U/L in men and 175.0 U/L in women. The 6-, 9-, and 12-mo OS rates were 81.7%, 72.4%, and 62.9%, respectively, for patients in the low GGT group (n = 44) and 58.8%, 35.7%, and 28.8%, respectively, for patients in the high GGT group (n = 96; P < .001). Multivariable Cox regression analysis identified high pretreatment serum GGT level (hazard ratio [HR], 2.71; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.67–4.40; P < .001), multiple tumors (HR, 3.05; 95% CI, 1.23–7.53; P = .02), and performance of target treatment (ie, sorafenib; HR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.24–0.72; P = .002) or ablation (HR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.18–0.66; P = .001) as independent prognostic factors for OS.ConclusionsPretreatment serum GGT level was an independent prognostic factor for OS in patients with advanced HCC treated with chemoembolization, suggesting that GGT is a useful prognostic biomarker for advanced HCC.     

Hypertensive Crisis during Microwave Ablation of Adrenal Neoplasms: A Retrospective Analysis of Predictive Factors

PurposeTo identify risk factors for hypertensive crisis (HC) during ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave (MW) ablation of adrenal neoplasms.Materials and MethodsPatients who underwent MW ablation for adrenal tumors between April 2006 and November 2017 were retrospectively identified for this study (51 consecutive patients; 35 males, 16 females; mean age, 55 years; range, 15–85 years). A total of 77 MW ablation treatments were performed for 67 tumors (24 primary [9 pheochromocytomas, 8 adenomas, and 7 cortical carcinomas]; and 43 metastases [22 hepatocellular carcinoma, 8 renal cell carcinoma, 5 non-small cell lung cancer, 4 colorectal cancer, 3 liposarcoma, and 1 malignant fibrous histiocytoma]). The mean diameter of the adrenal tumors was 4.6 cm (range, 1.2–16.2 cm). Information about patient demographics, imaging studies, pathology and laboratory results, procedure records, and clinical outcomes was retrieved and analyzed. Statistical analysis was then performed to determine potential risk factors for HC.ResultsOf the 77 MW ablation procedures, HC occurred in 13 (16.9%). A significantly higher risk of HC was observed in patients with pheochromocytoma (odds ratio [OR], 9.037; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.731–47.172; P = .009), body mass index <24 kg/m² (OR, 5.167; 95% CI, 1.060–25.194; P = .042), dominant tumor size ≤4.5 cm (OR, 4.023; 95% CI, 1.011–16.005; P = .048), and pre-procedural systolic blood pressure ≥130 mmHg (OR, 0.242; 95% CI, 0.068–0.861; P = .029).ConclusionHC can occur during MW ablation in patients with either primary or metastatic adrenal tumors. Pheochromocytoma, body mass index, tumor size, and pre-procedural systolic blood pressure appear to be significant risk factors for the occurrence of HC.     

Radiation Segmentectomy for the Treatment of Solitary Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Outcomes Compared with Those of Surgical Resection

PurposeTo investigate the outcomes of radiation segmentectomy (RS) versus standard-of-care surgical resection (SR).Materials and MethodsA multisite, retrospective analysis of treatment-naïve patients who underwent either RS or SR was performed. The inclusion criteria were solitary hepatocellular carcinoma ≤8 cm in size, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Cohort performance status of 0–1, and absence of macrovascular invasion or extrahepatic disease. Target tumor and overall progression, time to progression (TTP), and overall survival rates were assessed. Outcomes were censored for liver transplantation.ResultsA total of 123 patients were included (RS, 57; SR, 66). Tumor size, Child-Pugh class, albumin-bilirubin score, platelet count, and fibrosis stage were significantly different between cohorts (P ≤ .01). Major adverse events (AEs), defined as grade ≥3 per the Clavien-Dindo classification, occurred in 0 patients in the RS cohort vs 13 (20%) patients in the SR cohort (P < .001). Target tumor progression occurred in 3 (5%) patients who underwent RS and 5 (8%) patients who underwent SR. Overall progression occurred in 19 (33%) patients who underwent RS and 21 (32%) patients who underwent SR. The median overall TTP was 21.9 and 29.4 months after RS and SR, respectively (95% confidence interval [CI], 15.5–28.2 and 18.5–40.3, respectively; P = .03). Overall TTP subgroup analyses showed no difference between treatment cohorts with fibrosis stages 3–4 (P = .26) and a platelet count of <150 × 10⁹/L (P = .29). The overall progression hazard ratio for RS versus SR was not significant per the multivariate Cox regression analysis (1.16; 95% CI, 0.51–2.63; P = .71). The median overall survival was not reached for either of the cohorts. Propensity scores were calculated but were too dissimilar for analysis.ConclusionsRS and SR were performed in different patient populations, which limits comparison. RS approached SR outcomes, with a lower incidence of major AEs, in patients who were not eligible for hepatectomy.     

Transarterial Radioembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Major Vascular Invasion: A Nationwide Propensity Score–Matched Analysis with Target Trial Emulation

PurposeTo examine National Cancer Database (NCDB) data to comparatively evaluate overall survival (OS) between patients undergoing transarterial radioembolization (TARE) and those undergoing systemic therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma with major vascular invasion (HCC-MVI).MethodsOne thousand five hundred fourteen patients with HCC-MVI undergoing first-line TARE or systemic therapy were identified from the NCDB. OS was compared using propensity score–matched Cox regression and landmark analysis. Efficacy was also compared within a target trial framework.ResultsTARE usage doubled between 2010 and 2015. Intervals before treatment were longer for TARE than for systemic therapy (mean [median], 66.5 [60] days vs 46.8 (35) days, respectively, P < .0001). In propensity-score–matched and landmark-time–adjusted analyses, TARE was found to be associated with a hazard ratio of 0.74 (95 % CI, 0.60–0.91; P = .005) and median OS of 7.1 months (95 % CI, 5.0–10.5) versus 4.9 months (95 % CI, 3.9–6.5) for systemically treated patients. In an emulated target trial involving 236 patients with unilobular HCC-MVI, a low number of comorbidities, creatinine levels <2.0 mg/dL, bilirubin levels <2.0 mg/dL, and international normalized ratio <1.7, TARE was found to be associated with a hazard ratio of 0.57 (95 % CI, 0.39–0.83; P = .004) and a median OS of 12.9 months (95 % CI, 7.6–19.2) versus 6.5 months (95 % CI, 3.6–11.1) for the systemic therapy arm.ConclusionsIn propensity-score–matched analyses involving pragmatic and target trial HCC-MVI cohorts, TARE was found to be associated with significant survival benefits compared with systemic therapy. Although not a substitute for prospective trials, these findings suggest that the increasing use of TARE for HCC-MVI is accompanied by improved OS. Further trials of TARE in patients with HCC-MVI are needed, especially to compare with newer systemic therapies.     

Length of Stay Predicts Risk of Early Infection for Hospitalized Patients Undergoing Central Venous Port Placement

PurposeTo compare early totally implantable central venous port catheter–related infection rates after inpatient vs outpatient placement and to determine whether the risk associated with inpatient placement is influenced by length of hospital stay.Materials and MethodsIn this single-institution retrospective study, 5,301 patients (3,618 women; mean age 57 y) underwent port placement by interventional radiologists between October 2004 and January 2018. The 30-day infection rate was compared between inpatients and outpatients using survival analysis. Among inpatients, the effect of time from admission to port placement and from placement to discharge was analyzed using a survival regression tree.ResultsThe 30-day infection rate was 3.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.9%–6.1%) among 386 inpatients and 1.0% (95% CI = 0.7%–1.3%) among 4,915 outpatients (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.6, 95% CI = 2.0–6.6, P < .001). Inpatient placement was a significant risk factor after accounting for covariates in multivariate analysis (HR = 2.2, 95% CI = 1.0–4.7, P = .05) and controlling for demographic differences by propensity score matching (HR = 2.8, 95% CI = 1.0–7.8, P = .04). Infection rate was 11% (95% CI = 4.7%–22%) among 65 inpatients in whom time from admission to placement was ≥ 7 days, 5.1% (95% CI = 1.9%–11%) among 129 inpatients in whom admission to placement was < 7 days and time to discharge was > 3 days, and 0% (95% CI = 0%–2.1%) among 192 inpatients in whom admission to placement was < 7 days and time to discharge was ≤ 3 days (P < .001).ConclusionsInpatient port placement was associated with a higher risk of early infection. However, a clinical decision tree based on shorter length of stay before and after placement may identify a subset of hospitalized patients not at increased risk for infection.     

Image-Guided Ablation of Recurrent or Unresectable Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

PurposeTo assess the safety and effectiveness of image-guided ablation of recurrent or unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC).Materials and MethodsIn this retrospective study, 25 patients (14 women; age, 36–84 years) underwent 37 image-guided liver tumor ablation procedures to treat 47 ICCs (May 2004 to January 2022). At initial diagnosis, 20 patients had Stage 1 or 2 disease and 5 had Stage 3 or 4 disease. Before ablation, 19 (76.0%) of the 25 patients had progressed through prior treatments, including resection (n = 11), chemotherapy (n = 11), transarterial embolization (n = 3), or radiotherapy (n = 1); 6 (24.0%) of the 25 patients were treatment naïve. Ablation modality selection was based on patient and tumor characteristics and operator preference. Primary outcomes included local progression–free survival (LPFS) and overall survival (OS) after ablation. Statistical analysis included Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival analyses and Cox proportional hazards models.ResultsThe mean ablated tumor size was 2.0 cm ± 1.2 (range, 0.5–5.0 cm). The 1-, 2-, and 5-year LPFS rates were 84.0% (95% CI, 72.9–96.8), 73.0% (95% CI, 59.0–90.4), and 59.5% (95% CI, 41.6–85.1), respectively. The 1-, 2-, and 5-year secondary LPFS rates were 89.5% (95% CI, 80.2–99.9), 81.9% (95% CI, 69.4–96.6), and 75.6% (95% CI, 60.2–94.9). The 1-, 2-, and 5-year LPFS rates for tumors ≤2 cm in size were all 95.8% (95% CI, 88.2–100.0). The 1-, 2-, and 5-year OS rates were 78.5% (95% CI, 63.5–97.2), 68.4% (95% CI, 51.3–91.1), and 43.5% (95% CI, 23.5–80.5). Larger tumor size was associated with decreased time to local progression (hazard ratio, 1.93; P = .012).ConclusionsPercutaneous ablation provided favorable intermediate to long-term disease control for patients with recurrent or inoperable cholangiocarcinoma.     

The Use of Vascular Closure Devices for Brachial Artery Access: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PurposeTo estimate the rates of technical success and adverse events of vascular closure devices (VCDs) in the brachial artery and compare the rates of adverse events with manual compression.Materials and MethodsMEDLINE and Embase were searched for observational studies examining VCDs in the brachial artery. Meta-analyses were performed using random effects for the following outcomes: (a) technical success, (b) hematoma at the access site, (c) pseudoaneurysm, (d) local neurological adverse events, and (e) total number of adverse events. A pairwise meta-analysis compared VCD with manual compression for the outcomes of hematoma and the total number of adverse events.ResultsOf 1,761 eligible records, 16 studies including 510 access sites were included. Primary procedures performed were peripheral arterial disease interventions, percutaneous coronary intervention, and endovascular thrombectomy for ischemic stroke. The technical success rate was 93% (95% CI, 87%–96%; I² = 47%). Data on the following adverse events were obtained via meta-analysis: (a) hematoma, 9% (5%–15%; I² = 54%); (b) stenosis or occlusion at access site, 3% (1%–14%; I² = 51%); (c) infection, 0% (0%–5%; I² = 0%); (d) pseudoaneurysm, 4% (1%–13%; I² = 61%); (e) local neurological adverse events, 5% (2%–13%; I² = 54%); and (f) total number of adverse events, 15% (10%–22%; I² = 51%). Angio-Seal success rate was 96% (93%–98%; I² = 0%), whereas the ExoSeal success rate was 93% (69%–99%; I² = 61%). When comparing VCD and manual compression, there was no difference in hematoma formation (relative risk, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.35–1.63; I² = 0%; P = .47) or the total number of adverse events (relative risk, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.35–1.58; I² = 76%; P = .45).ConclusionsDespite being off-label, studies suggest that VCDs in the brachial artery have a high technical success rate. There was no significant difference in adverse events between VCDs and manual compression in the brachial artery.     

Computed Tomography Evaluation of In Vivo Pulmonary Cryoablation Zone Sizes

PurposeTo evaluate ablation zone sizes in patients undergoing pulmonary tumor cryoablation with 14-gauge cryoablation probes.Materials and MethodsA single-center retrospective analysis of all consecutive patients who underwent cryoablation of pulmonary tumors with 1 or more 14-gauge probes (August 2017 to June 2020) was performed. Intraprocedural and 1–2-month postprocedural chest computed tomography (CT) scans were evaluated to characterize pulmonary lesions, ice balls, and ablation zones. Single-probe 14-gauge ablation zone volumes were compared with manufacturer reference isotherms and single- and 2-probe ablation zones from a prior investigation of 17-gauge probes. Overall survival and local recurrence–free survival were calculated to 3 years.ResultsForty-seven pulmonary malignancies in 42 patients (women, 50%; mean age, 75.2 years ± 11.5) underwent cryoablation with 1 (n = 35), 2 (n = 10), or 3 (n = 2) cryoablation probes. One- to 2-month follow-up CT images were available for 30 of the 42 patients. The mean cryoablation zone volumes at 1–2 months when 1 (n = 21), 2 (n = 8), and 3 (n = 1) probes were used were 5.0 cm³ ± 2.3, 37.5 cm³ ± 20.5, and 28.4 cm³, respectively. The mean single-probe follow-up ablation zone volume was larger than that previously reported for 17-gauge probes (3.0 cm³ ± 0.3) (P < .001) but smaller than manufacturer-reported isotherms (11.6 cm³ for ?40 °C isotherm) and the 2-probe ablation zone volume with 17-gauge devices (12.9 cm³ ± 2.4) (for all, P < 001). The 3-year overall survival and local recurrence–free survival were 69% (95% confidence interval [CI], 53%–89%) and 87% (95% CI, 74%–100%), respectively.ConclusionsFourteen-gauge probes generate larger ablation volumes than those generated by 17-gauge probes. Manufacturer-reported isotherms are significantly larger than actual cryoablation zones. Cryoablation can attain low rates of local recurrence.     

Intra-Arterial Therapy for Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Meta-Analysis

PurposeTo evaluate the efficacy of hepatic arterial infusion (HAI), conventional transarterial chemoembolization, drug-eluting embolic transarterial chemoembolization (DEE-TACE), transarterial radioembolization, and their combinations with systemic chemotherapy (SCT) for unresectable colorectal liver metastases.MethodsA search was conducted on Embase, Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science for prospective nonrandomized studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from inception to June 20, 2020. Survival data of patients were recovered from original Kaplan-Meier curves by exploiting a graphical reconstructive algorithm. One-stage meta-analyses were conducted for the median overall survival (OS), survival rates (SRs), and restricted mean survival time (RMST), whereas two-stage meta-analyses of proportions were conducted to determine response rates (RRs) and conversion to resection rates (CRRs).ResultsA total of 71 prospective nonrandomized studies and 21 RCTs were identified, comprising 6,695 patients. Among patients treated beyond the first-line, DEE-TACE + SCT (n = 152) had the best survival outcomes of median OS of 26.5 (95% confidence interval [CI], 22.5–29.1) months and a 3-year RMST of 23.6 (95% CI, 21.8–25.5) months. Upon further stratification by publication year, DEE-TACE + SCT appeared to consistently have the highest pooled SRs at 1 year (81.9%) and 2 years (66.1%) in recent publications (2015–2020). DEE-TACE + SCT and HAI + SCT had the highest pooled RRs of 56.7% (I² = 0.90) and 62.6% (I² = 0.87) and pooled CRRs of 35.5% (I² = 0.00) and 30.3% (I² = 0.80), respectively.ConclusionsAlbeit significant heterogeneity, the paucity of high-quality evidence, and the noncomparative nature of all analyses, the overall evidence suggests that patients treated with DEE-TACE + SCT have the best oncological outcomes and greatest potential to be converted for resection.     

Transarterial Yttrium-90 Radioembolization for Unresectable Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PurposeTo investigate the overall efficacy and survival profile of yttrium-90 (⁹⁰Y) radioembolization for unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC).Materials and MethodsA systematic literature review and meta-analysis was completed using a random-effects model. Studies describing the use of ⁹⁰Y for unresectable ICC were included. The disease control rate (DCR), downstaged-to-resectable rate, cancer antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) response rate, pooled median overall survival (OS), pooled median progression-free survival (PFS), and mean reported survival rates ranging from 3 to 36 months were evaluated.ResultsTwenty-one studies detailing a total of 921 patients were included. The overall DCR was 82.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 76.7%–87.8%; I² = 81%). In 11% of the cases, patients were downstaged to being surgically resectable (95% CI, 6.1%–15.9%; I² = 78%). The CA19-9 response rate was 67.2% (95% CI, 54.5%–79.8%; I² = 60%). From the time of radioembolization, PFS was 7.8 months (95% CI, 4.2–11.3 months; I² = 94%) and median OS was 12.7 months (95% CI, 10.6–14.8 months; I² = 62%). Lastly, the mean overall reported survival proportions were 84% at 3 months (standard deviation [SD], 10%), 69% at 6 months (SD, 16%), 47% at 12 months (SD, 19%), 31% at 18 months (SD, 21%), 30% at 24 months (SD, 19%), 21% at 30 months (SD, 27%), and 5% at 36 months (SD, 7%).ConclusionsRadioembolization with ⁹⁰Y for unresectable ICC results in substantial downstaging, disease control, and survival.     

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prophylactic Transarterial Embolization for High-Risk Bleeding Peptic Ulcer Disease

The present systematic review determined the role of transarterial embolization (TAE) as a prophylactic treatment in bleeding peptic ulcers after initial successful endoscopic hemostasis. PubMed and Ovid Medline databases were searched from inception until July 2019 for studies that included patients deemed high-risk based on Forrest Classification, Rockall score ≥ 5, or endoscopic evaluation in addition to those who underwent prophylactic TAE after initial successful endoscopic hemostasis. Meta-analysis was performed to compare patients who underwent endoscopic therapy (ET) and TAE with those who underwent ET alone. The primary outcomes measured included rates of rebleeding, reintervention, and 30-day mortality. Secondary outcome measures evaluated length of hospitalization, technical success rates, and complications associated with TAE. Of 916 publications, 5 were eligible for inclusion; 310 patients with high-risk peptic ulcer bleeding underwent prophylactic TAE, and 255 were compared against a control group of 580 patients that underwent standard treatment with ET alone. Patients who underwent ET with TAE had lower 30-day rebleeding rates (odds ratio [OR], 0.35; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.15–0.85; P = .02; I² = 50%). The ET with TAE group had a lower 30-day mortality rate (OR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.10–0.83; P = .02; I² = 58%). There was no difference in pooled reintervention rates (OR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.43–1.08; P = .10; I² = 0%) and length of hospitalization (mean difference, ?0.32; 95% CI, ?1.88 to 1.24; P = .69; I² = 0%). Technical success rate of prophylactic TAE was 90.5% (95% CI, 83.09–97.98; I² = 75.9%). Pooled proportion of overall complication rate was 0.18% (95% CI, 0.00–1.28; I² = 0%). Prophylactic TAE has lower rebleeding and mortality with a good success rate and low complications. Prophylactic TAE after primary ET may be recommended for selected patients with high-risk bleeding ulcers; however, further studies should be performed to establish this as a routine tool in patients with bleeding peptic ulcer disease.