The use of intravenous iron in patients with cancer-related anaemia

Intravenous iron has become the standard of care in patients with renal failure receiving treatment with erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESAs) to treat true and functional iron deficiency and to prevent its development in haemodialysis patients. In cancer-related anaemia, several recently published, randomised studies suggested that intravenous iron improved haemoglobin response rates in ESA-treated patients compared to those treated with oral iron or placebo. The data supporting the efficacy of intravenous iron instead of oral iron in this setting are increasingly persuasive but larger randomised trials are needed before definitive recommendations are made.     

A fast-track anaemia clinic in the Emergency Department: feasibility and efficacy of intravenous iron administration for treating sub-acute iron deficiency anaemia

Background

Clinically significant anaemia, requiring red blood cell transfusions, is frequently observed in Emergency Departments (ED). To optimise blood product use, we developed a clinical protocol for the management of iron-deficiency anaemia in a fast-track anaemia clinic within the ED.

Materials and methods

From November 2010 to January 2014, patients presenting with sub-acute, moderate-to-severe anaemia (haemoglobin [Hb] <11 g/dL) and confirmed or suspected iron deficiency were referred to the fast-track anaemia clinic. Those with absolute or functional iron deficiency were given intravenous (IV) ferric carboxymaltose 500–1,000 mg/week and were reassessed 4 weeks after receiving the total iron dose. The primary study outcome was the haematological response (Hb≥12 g/dL and/or Hb increment ≥2 g/dL). Changes in blood and iron parameters, transfusion rates and IV iron-related adverse drug effects were secondary outcomes.

Results

Two hundred and two anaemic patients with iron deficiency (150 women/52 men; mean age, 64 years) were managed in the fast-track anaemia clinic, and received a median IV iron dose of 1,500 mg (1,000–2,000 mg). Gastro-intestinal (44%) or gynaecological (26%) bleeding was the most frequent cause of the anaemia. At follow-up (183 patients), the mean Hb increment was 3.9±2.2 g/dL; 84% of patients were classified as responders and blood and iron parameters normalised in 90%. During follow-up, 35 (17%) patients needed transfusions (2 [range: 1–3] units per patient) because they had low Hb levels, symptoms of anaemia and/or were at risk. Eight mild and one moderate, self-limited adverse drug effects were witnessed.

Discussion

Our data support the feasibility of a clinical protocol for management of sub-acute anaemia with IV iron in the ED. IV iron was efficacious, safe and well tolerated. Early management of anaemia will improve the use of blood products in the ED.     

Single-dose intravenous ferric carboxymaltose infusion versus multiple fractionated doses of intravenous iron sucrose in the treatment of post-operative anaemia in colorectal cancer patients: a randomised controlled trial

BackgroundRecent clinical guidelines suggest that treatment of postoperative anaemia in colorectal cancer surgery with intravenous iron reduces transfusion requirements and improves outcomes. The study aimed at comparing two intravenous iron regimens in anaemic patients after colorectal cancer surgery.Materials and methodsThis was a single-centre, open-label, randomised, controlled trial in patients undergoing elective colorectal cancer surgery. Patients with moderate to severe anaemia (haemoglobin [Hb] <11 g/dL) after surgery were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive ferric carboxymaltose (FC; 1,000 mg, single dose) or iron sucrose (IS; 200 mg every 48 hours until covering the total iron deficit or discharge). Randomisation was stratified by Hb level: <10 g/dL (Group A) or ≥10–10.9 (Group B). The primary endpoint was the change in Hb concentration at postoperative day 30. Secondary endpoints included iron status parameters, transfusion requirements, complications, and length of hospital stay.ResultsFrom September 2015 to May 2018, 104 patients were randomised (FC 50, IS 54). The median intravenous iron dose was 1,000 mg and 600 mg in the FC and IS groups, respectively. There were no between-group differences in mean change in Hb from postoperative day 1 to postoperative day 30 (FC: 2.5 g/dL, 95% CI: 2.1–2.9; IS: 2.4 g/dL, 95% CI: 2.0–2.8; p=0.52), in transfusion requirements or length of stay. The infection rate was lower in the FC group compared with the IS group (9.8% vs 37.2%, respectively).DiscussionThe administration of approximately 500 mg of IS resulted in an increase in Hb at postoperative day 30 similar to that of 1,000 mg of FC, but it was associated with a higher infection rate. Future research will be needed to confirm the results, and to choose the best regime in terms of effectiveness and side effects to treat postoperative anaemia in colorectal cancer patients.     

A prospective randomized,controlled trial of intravenous versus oral iron for moderate iron deficiency anaemia of pregnancy

Abstract. Khalafallah A, Dennis A, Bates J, Bates G, Robertson IK, Smith L, Ball MJ, Seaton D, Brain T, Rasko JEJ Launceston General Hospital (LGH), Australia; University of Tasmania, Australia; and Centenary Institute, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia) A prospective randomized, controlled trial of intravenous versus oral iron for moderate iron deficiency anaemia of pregnancy. J Intern Med 2010; 268 : 286–295. Background. Iron deficiency anaemia is the most common deficiency disorder in the world, affecting more than one billion people, with pregnant women at particular risk. Objectives and design. We conducted a single site, prospective, nonblinded randomized‐controlled trial to compare the efficacy, safety, tolerability and compliance of standard oral daily iron versus intravenous iron Subjects. We prospectively screened 2654 pregnant women between March 2007 and January 2009 with a full blood count and iron studies, of which 461 (18%) had moderate IDA. Two hundred women matched for haemoglobin concentration and serum ferritin level were recruited. Interventions. Patients were randomized to daily oral ferrous sulphate 250 mg (elemental iron 80 mg) with or without a single intravenous iron polymaltose infusion. Results. Prior to delivery, the intravenous plus oral iron arm was superior to the oral iron only arm as measured by the increase in haemoglobin level (mean of 19.5 g/L vs. 12 g/L; P < 0.001); the increase in mean serum ferritin level (222 μg/L vs. 18 ug/L; P < 0.001); and the percentage of mothers with ferritin levels below 30 μg/L (4.5% vs. 79%; P < 0.001). A single dose of intravenous iron polymaltose was well tolerated without significant side effects. Conclusions. Our data indicate that intravenous iron polymaltose is safe and leads to improved efficacy and iron stores compared to oral iron alone in pregnancy‐related IDA.     

Use of erythropoiesis stimulating agents and intravenous iron for cancer and treatment-related anaemia: the need for predictors and indicators of effectiveness has not abated

Cancer and treatment-related anaemia is a significant clinical problem. Erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESA) improve anaemia and ultimately enhance patients' quality of life. However, about one-third of patients do not respond to ESA administration, mostly because of the impaired supply of iron to the erythroid marrow (functional iron deficiency). Concomitant administration of intravenous (IV) iron may improve responsiveness. The use of baseline predictors of response to ESA and of indicators of appropriateness of response and iron availability should allow targeted therapeutic interventions with both ESA and IV iron. Several biochemical and haematological indicators of response and of iron balance have been studied, but firm criteria for their use have not yet been rigorously established. The commonly used early predictive markers of response to ESA, such as baseline endogenous erythropoietin levels and an increase in haemoglobin, reticulocytes, and soluble transferrin receptor levels during ESA treatment, have not proved reliable due to their low sensitivity and specificity. Traditional markers of iron availability, such as serum ferritin and transferrin saturation display interpretation pitfalls. The need for predictors and indicators of responsiveness to ESA and IV iron is still current and clinically relevant.     

UK guidelines on the management of iron deficiency in pregnancy

Iron deficiency is the most common deficiency state in the world, affecting more than 2 billion people globally. Although it is particularly prevalent in less-developed countries, it remains a significant problem in the developed world, even where other forms of malnutrition have already been almost eliminated. Effective management is needed to prevent adverse maternal and pregnancy outcomes, including the need for red cell transfusion. The objective of this guideline is to provide healthcare professionals with clear and simple recommendations for the diagnosis, treatment and prevention of iron deficiency in pregnancy and the postpartum period. This is the first such guideline in the UK and may be applicable to other developed countries. Public health measures, such as helminth control and iron fortification of foods, which can be important to developing countries, are not considered here. The guidance may not be appropriate to all patients and individual patient circumstances may dictate an alternative approach.     

A comparison between intravenous iron polymaltose complex (Ferrum Hausmann®) and oral ferrous fumarate in the treatment of iron deficiency anaemia in pregnancy

Abstract: Anaemia is the most common medical disorder in pregnancy with iron deficiency anaemia accounting for the majority of cases. Over 90% of the iron deficiency anaemia is due to red cell iron deficiency associated with depleted iron stores and deficient intake. The two main modalities of treating iron deficiency anaemia are oral or parenteral iron. Ferrous Hausmann® (iron dextrin) is the latest iron preparation which can be used for intravenous parenteral administration as a total dose infusion. This study compares the efficacy of Ferrum Hausmann® with oral ferrous fumarate therapy in the treatment of iron deficiency anaemia in pregnancy. Our study shows that treatment with intravenous Ferrum Hausmann® (iron dextrin) resulted in a significantly better level and rate of increase of haemoglobin (p<0.001). Serum ferritin, which is the best indicator of iron stores, was significantly higher (p<0.001) in the intravenous group. Other indices of iron status such as serum iron, serum transferrin and zinc protoporphyrin also showed a significant improvement in the intravenous group compared to those given oral iron. The results suggest that intravenous iron as a total dose infusion is able to replenish iron stores more efficiently, completely and at a faster rate than oral iron therapy, thus providing the fuel for stimulation of full erythopoiesis compared to oral iron. There were also no reports of any adverse reactions with intravenous iron dextrin, whereas there were a considerable proportion of women on oral iron therapy who reported side effects. In conclusion, intravenous iron therapy with Ferrous Hausmann® (iron dextrin) is a suitable, effective and safe alternative to oral iron therapy in the treatment of iron deficiency anaemia in pregnancy.     

Pediatric Crohn's disease,iron deficiency anemia and intravenous iron treatment: a follow-up study

Background and aims: Increasing evidence in adults demonstrates efficacy and safety of IV iron in inflammatory Bowel disease (IBD) associated iron deficiency anemia; however, evidence in pediatric patients is yet scarce and no previous study has included a long follow-up. This study aimed to evaluate safety and efficacy of IV iron (primary end point), and the need of re-treatment (secondary end point), in this setting.

Methods: Prospective recruitment (40 months); PCDAI determined before and after treatment; anemia defined according to WHO criteria; IV iron treatment included iron sucrose and ferric carboxymaltose. Primary and secondary endpoints included hemoglobin, serum ferritin, transferrin saturation at baseline and 4-6 weeks after treatment; and the need of re-treatment during the median follow-up period (18 months), respectively.

Results: Nineteen patients (median age: 15.5 years) with remissive/mild disease were included. At recruitment, the median hemoglobin was 10.5?g/dl, (median s-ferritin: 20.1 ug/l, median transferrin saturation; 6%) and 4-6 weeks after treatment was 12.7?g/dl. Median hemoglobin according to age groups before vs. after treatment:?<12 years:11 vs. 12.0?g/dl; females ≥12 years:9.9 vs. 12.6?g/dl; and males ≥12 years:11.1 vs. 13.3?g/dl. Patients with remissive vs. mild disease had median Hb of 10.5?g/dl vs. 10.6?g/dl, and median s-ferritin: 6.8 ug/dl vs. 43.3 ug/dl, respectively). Nine patients were treated with iron sucrose (median dose 672.6?mg/dl) and 10 patients with ferric carboxymaltose (median dose 811.5?mg/dl). No major adverse reactions occurred. Six patients needed re-treatment after a median 15.5 months period.

Conclusions: Our prospective study, concerning pediatric IBD anemia patients with remission/mild disease and a significant follow-up, emphasizes efficacy and safety of IV-iron and the importance of long-term follow-up of iron status.

Summary: In pediatric IBD iron anemia, the evidence supporting the efficacy and safety of IV-iron is scare. This prospective study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy (short and long term) of IV-iron in these patients. Nineteen pediatric CD patients were evaluated before and after IV iron treatment (40-month period).The median Hb before and after IV iron was 10.5 and 12.7?g/dl, respectively. No major adverse reactions were documented. Six patients needed re-treatment (median period of 15.5 months). This study further demonstrates the efficacy and safety of IV iron. It reinforces the importance of long-term follow-up of the iron status in pediatric CD patients.     

The impact of timing of intravenous iron supplementation on preoperative haemoglobin in patients scheduled for major surgery

BackgroundAnaemia is frequent and an independent risk factor for morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing surgery. Iron deficiency (ID) is the main cause for anaemia and can be corrected by intravenous (IV) iron. The aim of this study was to investigate the timing of preoperative IV iron supplementation on preoperative haemoglobin (Hb) level.Materials and methodsSurgical patients were screened for the presence of anaemia and ID from November 2015 to January 2020. In case of ID or iron deficiency anaemia (IDA), patients received IV iron supplementation. The timing of IV iron supplementation on preoperative Hb level was analysed by days and time frames clustered by 5 days before surgery.ResultsIn total, 404 patients with IV iron supplementation were analysed. In all patients, IV iron was administered with a median (interquartile range [IQR]) of 3.0 (1.0; 9.0) days before surgery. Preoperative Hb level increased steadily starting from 6 days (0.13 [±1.2] g/dL) until 16 days before surgery (1.75 [±1.1] g/dL). Group comparison revealed a median preoperative Hb change of −0.2 (−0.5; 0.2) g/dL for days 1–5, 0.2 (0.0; 0.7) g/dL for days 6–10, 0.7 (0.2; 1.1) g/dL for days 11–15, 0.7 (0.2; 1.8) g/dL for days 16–20, 0.9 (0.3; 1.7) g/dL for days 21–25, 1.5 (0.4; 2.6) g/dL for days 26–30, and 0.6 (0.0; 1.7) g/dL for >31 days. Three patients received multiple administrations of IV iron which resulted in an increase in Hb of >4 g/dL.DiscussionSupplementation of IV iron to increase Hb concentration preoperatively may be most effective if administered at least ten days before surgery.     

Efficacy and safety of intravenous iron therapy as an alternative/adjunct to allogeneic blood transfusion

Anaemia is a common condition among patients admitted to hospital medicosurgical departments, as well as in critically ill patients. Anaemia is more frequently due to absolute iron deficiency (e.g. chronic blood loss) or functional iron deficiency (e.g. chronic inflammatory states), with other causes being less frequent. In addition, preoperative anaemia is one of the major predictive factors for perioperative blood transfusion. In surgical patients, postoperative anaemia is mainly caused by perioperative blood loss, and it might be aggravated by inflammation-induced inhibition of erythropoietin and functional iron deficiency (a condition that cannot be corrected by the administration of oral iron). All these mechanisms may be involved in the anaemia of the critically ill. Intravenous iron administration seems to be safe, as very few severe side-effects were observed, and may result in hastened recovery from anaemia and lower transfusion requirements. However, it is noteworthy that many of the recommendations given for intravenous iron treatment are not supported by a high level of evidence and this must be borne in mind when making decisions regarding its application to a particular patient. Nonetheless, this also indicates the need for further large, randomized controlled trials on the safety and efficacy of intravenous iron for the treatment of anaemia in different clinical settings.     

Aetiology of severe iron overload in a family with hereditary haemolytic anaemia

Severe iron overload is a reported complication of certain erythroid disorders which are characterized by increased erythropoietic activity. Proposed mechanisms include enhancement of iron absorption secondary to increased erythroid activity and coexistent heterozygosity or homozygosity for haemochromatosis. We performed PCR-based analysis for the haemochromatosis-related HFE C282Y mutation in an extended family with inherited haemolytic anaemia in which several members exhibited iron overload. The results demonstrated iron overload was associated with homozygosity but not heterozygosity for this mutation. Such an association may also exist in other erythroid disorders in which iron overload has been reported.     

Safety and efficacy of intravenous iron isomaltoside for correction of anaemia in patients with inflammatory bowel disease in everyday clinical practice

Aims: Iron deficiency anaemia (IDA) is common in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), who are often treated with intravenous iron. This observational study aimed to investigate the effectiveness and safety of iron isomaltoside in routine practical care of IDA in IBD patients.

Methods: The study included 197 IBD patients designated for treatment with iron isomaltoside. Treatment was administered according to routine practice. Data were recorded at baseline and after approximately 4, 8, and 16 weeks. Efficacy data included haemoglobin (Hb) levels and haematinics, while safety data included adverse drug reactions and safety laboratory variables.

Results: Patients received a mean (range) cumulative dose of 1304 (100–3500) mg iron isomaltoside. Hb increased from 10.7(±1.6) g/dL at baseline to 13.1(±1.5) g/dL at the final visit. In addition, serum iron, ferritin and transferrin saturation increased and soluble transferrin receptor decreased. Calprotectin decreased, as did IBD symptom scores, Harvey–Bradshaw Index (Crohn’s disease) and partial Mayo score (Ulcerative colitis). About 8% of patients reported transient adverse reactions, most commonly skin reactions, nausea and vomiting, and 2% SAEs, most frequently tachycardia.

Conclusion: Iron isomaltoside was demonstrated to be effective and had a good safety profile in IBD patients in everyday clinical practice in Germany.