Emergency Medicine Resident Moonlighting: A Survey of Program Directors

OBJECTIVES: 1) To systematically describe emergency medicine (EM) program directors' perceptions of the benefits and risks of resident moonlighting. 2) To assess moonlighting policies of EM residencies, the degree of compliance with these policies, and the methods of dealing with residents who are out of compliance. METHODS: A written survey was mailed or hand-delivered to all allopathic and osteopathic EM residency directors in the United States in 1992-93. Incomplete and ambiguous surveys were completed by phone. RESULTS: There was a 96% response rate (113/118). The average EM resident clinical workweek ranged from 38 to 50 hours while the resident was assigned to ED rotations. Most (90%) of the program directors believe moonlighting interferes with residency duties to some degree. Few (10%) programs prohibit moonlighting altogether, although 44% limit moonlighting to an average of 41.5 hours per month. Program directors believe residents moonlight primarily for financial reasons. Most (60%) of the program directors believe moonlighting offers experience not available in the residency, primarily related to autonomous practice. Fifteen programs reported residents who had been sued for malpractice while moonlighting, with one program director named along with the resident. One third of program directors have penalized residents for abuse of moonlighting privileges. CONCLUSIONS: EM residency directors are concerned about the effect of moonlighting on resident education. The directors' concerns regarding litigation, excessive work hours, and interference with residency duties are balanced by a general acceptance of the financial need to supplement residency income.     

Gender and the Council of Emergency Medicine Residency Directors Standardized Letter of Recommendation

OBJECTIVES: Until 2002, the Council of Emergency Medicine Residency Directors standardized letter of recommendation (SLOR) prompted authors to predict how an applicant would rank on their match list. A ranking of guaranteed match (GM) was identified as the least common superlative response on the SLOR. That knowledge allowed precise identification of the best SLORs. The authors correlated GM with every possible author/applicant gender combination. METHODS: This was a retrospective, observational study of 835 SLORs submitted in the 1998-1999 and 1999-2000 application cycles to one emergency medicine residency program. A standardized data collection instrument was used. Author/applicant gender combinations (M/M, M/F, F/F, F/M, M/M + F/F, and M/F + F/M) were analyzed with respect to GM by chi-square test, odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals, and logistic regression. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant association between a female-authored/female-applicant SLOR and GM, with a female applicant two times more likely to get a GM from a female author than any other author/applicant gender combination (odds ratio, 2.0; 95% confidence interval = 1.1 to 3.8; p = 0.023). No other combination was significantly associated with GM. CONCLUSIONS: Female applicants to the authors' emergency residency program had a two times better chance of receiving a GM recommendation on a SLOR written by a female faculty member compared with any other possible gender combination of applicants and letter authors. Although the choice of GM has now been eliminated from the SLOR, the role of gender in relation to the SLOR merits further study.     

Radiology Services in Emergency Medicine Residency Programs: A National Survey

OBJECTIVES: To determine who reads plain film radiographs, how quickly radiologists' interpretations are available, how many initial readings require correction, and how satisfied emergency physicians (EPs) are with radiology in emergency departments (EDs) with emergency medicine (EM) residency programs. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to the chairs of all U.S. EM residencies, asking about EM radiology services. RESULTS: Of 120 sites surveyed, 97 (81%) responded. Respondents reported that, on weekday days, EM attendings or residents performed the radiograph interpretation used for clinical decision making at 66% of sites; on nights and weekends, EPs performed the clinically relevant readings at 79% of sites. Twenty-one percent of sites reported that no radiologist reviewed images before patients left the ED on nights and weekends. Only 39% of sites reported that all images were read within four hours on weekday days, and only 19% of sites reported readings within this time frame on nights and weekends. Median misinterpretation rates were reported as 1% on weekday days and 1.5% at other times. Overall, EPs were satisfied with their interactions with radiology at 63% of EDs. CONCLUSIONS: This study summarizes the perceptions of EPs regarding radiology services; the findings must be interpreted with caution, given the lack of external validation. Nevertheless, EPs report that many EM residency programs depend on EPs' interpretations of radiographs. Emergency physicians report that attending radiologists rarely read images on nights and weekends and that images are misread more frequently at these times. Although EPs were satisfied with many aspects of radiology, EPs expressed the most dissatisfaction with turnaround times and misreads.     

Perceptions of Pediatric Emergency Medicine Fellows and Program Directors about Research Education

Pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) fellows who entered training after January 1995 are required to complete three years of fellowship training. Additionally, they are required to receive instruction in related basic sciences and to demonstrate research competence. OBJECTIVES: To determine: 1) whether PEM fellows and program directors perceive their programs as providing adequate training in research principles, 2) the manner in which these principles are taught, and 3) the commitment of fellows and program directors to research and research training. METHODS: Pediatric emergency medicine fellows who participated in the Fourth Annual PEM Fellows Conference (Miami, Florida, March 1997) were surveyed. The survey was then extended via mail to all PEM fellows and program directors in the United States and Canada. RESULTS: A total of 159 of the 220 fellows (72%) in the United States and Canada returned completed questionnaires. Fifty-three of 70 PEM fellows (76%) who attended the conference completed questionnaires, and 106 of 167 fellows (63%) who did not attend the conference responded by mail. Fifty-three of the 63 program directors (84%) returned completed questionnaires. Of 159 responding fellows, 86 (54%), and of 53 responding program directors, 29 (58%) reported that their programs lacked adequate training in one or more of the surveyed research areas. Thirteen program directors (25%) reported no formal research training in their curricula. Programs that included formal research training were perceived to have higher overall quality than programs that failed to offer such formal training. Sixty-six of 158 responding fellows (42%) anticipated an ongoing commitment to research in their careers. One hundred fourteen of 153 responding fellows (75%) indicated that, if given the option, they would have pursued a two-year "clinical track" PEM board certification that did not include a research requirement. CONCLUSIONS: More than half of surveyed PEM fellows and program directors perceived important deficiencies in research education within their training programs. Further research is necessary in order to evaluate the validity of these perceptions.     

Developing a Standardized Faculty Evaluation in an Emergency Medicine Residency

Background: Quality educators are a core component of successful residency training. A structured, consistent, validated evaluation of clinical educators is important to improve teaching aptitude, further faculty development, and improve patient care. Study Objectives: The authors sought to identify specific domains of instructional quality and to develop a composite instrument for assessing instructional quality. Methods: The study setting is a 3-year residency program. Residents rated the quality of faculty member instruction using an 18-item survey twice over a 2-year period (2004–2005). Each survey item used a 9-point scale. Factor analysis employing a Varimax rotation identified domains of instructional performance. Cronbach's alpha was used to assess the internal consistency of the identified domains. Results: There were 29 faculty members evaluated. Using 2004 data, five domains of instructional quality were identified that explained 92.5% of the variation in survey responses (χ² = 2.33, P = 0.11). These were: Competency and Professionalism (30% of variation), Commitment to Knowledge and Instruction (23%), Inclusion and Interaction (17%), Patient Focus (13%), and Openness to Ideas (9%). Competency and Professionalism included appropriate care, effective patient communication, use of new techniques, and ethical principles. Commitment to Knowledge and Instruction included research, mentoring, feedback, and availability. Inclusion and Interaction included procedural participation and bedside teaching. Patient Focus included compassion, effective care, and sensitivity to diverse populations. Openness to Ideas included enthusiasm and receptivity of new ideas. These five domains were consistent in the 2005 data (Cronbach's alpha 0.68–0.75). Conclusions: A five-domain instrument consistently accounted for variations in faculty teaching performance as rated by resident physicians. This instrument may be useful for standardized assessment of instructional quality.     

Academic Emergency Medicine Staffing Nonacademic Emergency Department Sites: A National Survey

Changing health care markets have threatened academic health centers and their traditional focus on teaching and research. OBJECTIVES: To determine the number of academic emergency medicine departments (AEMDs) that staff additional non-academic ED sites and to determine whether clinical reimbursement monies from those ED sites are used for academic purposes. METHODS: A two-part survey of all 119 academic EM programs listed in the 1997-1998 Graduate Medical Education Directory was conducted. Questionnaires were addressed to each AEMD chair. AEMDs and ED sites were characterized. Hiring difficulties, EM faculty academic productivity, and use of ED site reimbursement monies for academic activities were assessed. RESULTS: Ninety-nine of 119 (83%) AEMDs responded. Twenty-three (23%) AEMDs staffed 28 added ED sites. These sites tended to be urban (65%), with moderate volumes (25,000-35,000 patients/year), and had an equal or better reimbursement rate than the AEMD (89%). ED sites were commonly staffed by academic EM faculty (79%) and EM residents (29%). Ninety-six percent of the AEMDs had hired additional faculty; hiring new faculty was considered easy. Academic productivity at AEMDs with added ED sites was reported as unchanged. Reimbursement monies from these ED sites were commonly used for faculty salary support, faculty development, and EM research and residency activities. CONCLUSIONS: Academic EM departments are often affiliated with nonacademic ED sites. These additional sites are commonly staffed by academic EM faculty and EM residents. Academic productivity does not appear to decrease when additional ED sites are added. Reimbursement monies from these ED sites commonly supports academic activities.     

Violence in the Emergency Department: A National Survey of Emergency Medicine Residents and Attending Physicians

Background: Violence in the Emergency Department (ED) is a well-known phenomenon. Few studies have been done to assess the incidence and nature of violence in the ED. Study Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess the incidence of violence in the ED nationwide. Methods: This study was a prospective, cross-sectional online survey of Emergency Medicine (EM) residents and attending physicians. Of the 134 accredited United States (US) EM residency programs, 65 programs were randomly selected and invited to participate. Results: Overall, 272 surveys were returned, of which 263 (97%) were completed and further analyzed. At least one workplace violence act in the previous 12 months was reported by 78% (95% confidence interval 73–83%) of respondents, with 21% reporting more than one type of violent act. Workplace violence was experienced similarly between males and females (79% vs. 75%, respectively; p = 0.65), and was more common in EDs with annual volumes over 60,000 patients (82% vs. 67%; p = 0.01). The most common type of workplace violence was verbal threats (75%) followed by physical assaults (21%), confrontations outside the workplace (5%), and stalking (2%). Security was available full time in most settings (98%), but was least likely to be physically present in patient care areas. The majority of respondent EDs did not screen for weapons (40% screened) or have metal detectors (38% had metal detectors). Only 16% of programs provided violence workshops, and less than 10% offered self-defense training. Conclusion: Despite the high incidence of workplace violence experienced by the emergency physicians who responded to our survey, less than half of these respondents worked in EDs that screened for weapons or had metal detectors. An even smaller number of physicians worked in settings that provided violence workshops or self-defense training.     

The Business of Emergency Medicine: A Nonclinical Curriculum Proposal for Emergency Medicine Residency Programs

Over the course of their postgraduate medical education, physicians are expected not only to acquire an extensive knowledge of clinical medicine and sound procedural skills, but also to develop competence in their other professional roles as communicator, collaborator, mediator, manager, teacher, and patient advocate. Although the need for physicians to develop stronger service delivery skills is well recognized, residency programs may underemphasize formal training in nonclinical proficiencies. As a result, graduates can begin their professional careers with an incomplete understanding of the operation of health care systems and how to utilize system resources in the manner best suited to their patients' needs. This article proposes the content, educational strategy, and needs assessment for an academic program entitled The Business of Emergency Medicine (BOEM). Developed as an adjunct to the (predominantly) clinical content of traditional emergency medicine (EM) training programs, BOEM is designed to enhance the existing academic curricula with additional learning opportunities by which EM residents can acquire a fundamental understanding of the nonclinical skills of their specialty.     

Pediatric Emergency Medicine Education in Emergency Medicine Training Programs

BACKGROUND: The educational goal of emergency medicine (EM) programs has been to prepare its graduates to provide care for a diverse range of patients and presentations, including pediatric patients. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the methods used to teach pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) to EM residents. METHODS: A written questionnaire was distributed to 118 EM programs. Demographic data were requested concerning the type of residency program, number of residents, required pediatric rotations, elective pediatric rotations, type of hospital and settings in which pediatric patients are seen, and procedures performed. Information was also requested on the educational methods used, proctoring EM received, and any formal curriculum used. RESULTS: Ninety-four percent (111/118) of the programs responded, with 80% of surveys completed by the residency director. Proctoring was primarily performed by PEM attendings and general EM attendings. Formal means of PEM education most often included the EM core curriculum (94%), journal club (95%), EM grand rounds (94%), and EM morbidity and mortality (M&M) conference (91%). Rotations and electives most often included the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) and the emergency department (ED) (general and pediatric). CONCLUSIONS: Emergency medicine residents are exposed to PEM primarily by rotating through a general ED, the PED, and the PICU, being proctored by PEM and EM attendings and attending EM lectures and EM M&M conferences. Areas that may merit further attention for pediatric emergency training include experience in areas of neonatal resuscitation, pediatric M&M, and specific pediatric electives. This survey highlights the need to describe current educational strategies as a first step to assess perceived effectiveness.     

Selection Criteria for Emergency Medicine Residency Applicants

OBJECTIVES: To determine the criteria used by emergency medicine (EM) residency selection committees to select their residents, to determine whether there is a consensus among residency programs, to inform programs of areas of possible inconsistency, and to better educate applicants pursuing careers in EM. METHODS: A questionnaire consisting of 20 items based on the current Electronic Residency Application Service (ERAS) guidelines was mailed to the program directors of all 118 EM residencies in existence in February 1998. The program directors were instructed to rank each item on a five-point scale (5 = most important, 1 = least important) as to its importance in the selection of residents. Followup was done in the form of e-mail and facsimile. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 79.7%, with 94 of 118 programs responding. Items ranking as most important (4.0-5.0) in the selection process included: EM rotation grade (mean +/- SD = 4.79 +/- 0.50), interview (4.62 +/- 0.63), clinical grades (4.36 +/- 0.70), and recommendations (4.11 +/- 0.85). Moderate emphasis (3.0-4.0) was placed on: elective done at program director's institution (3.75 +/- 1.25), U.S. Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) step II (3.34 +/- 0.93), interest expressed in program director's institution (3.30 +/- 1.19), USMLE step I (3.28 +/- 0.86), and awards/achievements (3.16 +/- 0.88). Less emphasis (<3.0) was placed on Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Society (AOA) status (3.01 +/- 1.09), medical school attended (3.00 +/- 0.85), extracurricular activities (2.99 +/- 0.87), basic science grades (2.88 +/- 0.93), publications (2.87 +/- 0.99), and personal statement (2.75 +/- 0.96). Items most agreed upon by respondents (lowest standard deviation, SD) included EM rotation grade (SD 0.50), interview (SD 0.63), and clinical grades (SD 0.70). Of the 94 respondents, 37 (39.4%) replied they had minimum requirements for USMLE step I (195.11 +/- 13.10), while 30 (31.9%) replied they had minimum requirements for USMLE step II (194.27 +/- 14.96). Open-ended responses to "other" were related to personal characteristics, career/goals, and medical school performance. CONCLUSIONS: The selection criteria with the highest mean values as reported by the program directors were EM rotation grade, interview, clinical grades, and recommendations. Criteria showing the most consistency (lowest SD) included EM rotation grade, interview, and clinical grades. Results are compared with those from previous multispecialty studies.     

Asthma Coaching in the Pediatric Emergency Department

Objectives: Coaching and monetary incentives have been used to modify medical behavior of individuals with several chronic diseases, including asthma. The authors performed a randomized, controlled trial of an intervention combining asthma coaching during an emergency department (ED) visit for asthma, and monetary incentive to improve follow-up with primary care providers (PCP).
Methods: Subjects were parents of children 2–12 years of age, with Medicaid or no medical insurance, receiving treatment for asthma in the ED. The primary outcome was a verified PCP visit for asthma within two weeks of the index ED visit. All parents received 15 for their time in the ED. Parents in the intervention group were told that they would receive an additional 15 monetary incentive if a PCP visit was completed. The coach engaged in a dialogue with the parent during the ED visit, and discussed the importance and advantages of seeking follow-up care with the child's PCP. All parents received the usual discharge instructions, including advice to see the PCP within three days.
Results: The authors enrolled 92 parents; outcome data were available for 86 (42 controls, 50 intervention). Demographic characteristics were similar in both groups. There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients who had follow-up PCP visits between the intervention (22.0%; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] = 11.5% to 36.0%) and control (23.8%; 95% CI = 12.0% to 39.4%) groups (p = 0.99).
Conclusions: An intervention combining asthma coaching during acute ED visits and a monetary incentive to return for a PCP visit does not appear to increase follow-up with the PCP.     

Pediatric Migraine: Abortive Management in the Emergency Department

Studies suggest that headache accounts for approximately 1% of pediatric emergency department (ED) visits. ED physicians must distinguish between primary headaches, such as a tension or migraine, and secondary headaches caused by systemic disease including neoplasm, infection, or intracranial hemorrhage. A recent study found that 40% of children presenting to the ED with headache were diagnosed with a primary headache, and 75% of these were migraine. Once the diagnosis of migraine has been made, the ED physician is faced with the challenge of determining appropriate abortive treatment. This review summarizes the most recent literature on pediatric migraine with an emphasis on diagnosis and abortive treatment in the ED.     

Emergency Medical Services Education in Emergency Medicine Residency Programs: A National Survey

Objectives: Emergency medical services (EMS) was recently approved as a subspecialty by the American Board of Medical Specialties, highlighting the core content of knowledge that encompasses prehospital emergency patient care. This study aimed to describe the current state of EMS education at emergency medicine (EM) residency programs in the United States. Methods: The authors distributed an online survey containing multiple‐choice and free‐response questions pertaining to resident EMS education to the directors of EM residency programs in the United States between July 21 and September 10, 2010. Results: Of 154 programs, 117 (75%) responded to the survey, and 108 (70%) completed the survey by answering all required questions. Of completed surveys, 82 programs (76%) reported the cumulative time devoted to EMS didactic education during the course of residency training, a median of 20 hours (range = 3 to 300 hours; interquartile range [IQR] = 12 to 36 hours). There is a designated EMS rotation in 89% of programs, with a median duration of 3 weeks (range = 1 to 9 weeks; IQR = 2 to 4 weeks). Most programs involve residents on EMS rotations strictly as in‐field observers (63%), some as in‐field providers (20%), and the rest with some combination of the two roles. Ground ride‐along is required in 94% of programs, while air ride‐along is mandatory in 4% and optional in 81% of programs. Direct medical oversight (DMO) certification is required in 41% of residency programs, but not available in 26% of program jurisdictions. Residents in 92% of programs provide DMO. In those programs, most residents (77%) provide DMO primarily while working in the emergency department (ED), 13% during dedicated EMS or medical oversight shifts, and 4% during a combination of these shifts. Disaster‐preparedness was most frequently listed as the component programs would like to add to their EMS curricula. Conclusions: There is a wide range in the didactic, online, and in‐field EMS educational experiences provided as part of EM training. Most residents participate in ground ride‐along activities, provide DMO, and have a dedicated EMS rotation. Disaster‐preparedness is the most common desired addition to existing EMS rotations. ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE 2012; 19:1–6 © 2012 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine