The stripping technique: in vitro absorption and penetration of five UV filters on excised fresh human skin

This article gives the results of a study whose aim was to compare the compartmental distribution and absorption of 5 UV filters, in vitro, by fresh human skin, after exposure times of 30 min and 16 h. These UV filters from BASF (octyl methoxycinnamate, benzophenone 4, benzophenone 3, octyl triazone and octocrylene) were incorporated separately in a simple oil-in-water emulsion. The composition of the emulsions was designed in order to obtain a sun protection factor of 5. Therefore the UV filters were introduced into the emulsions at different concentrations. We show that the affinity for each skin level [stratum corneum (SC), viable epidermis, dermis and receptor fluid] is different according to the test substance used. Some substances accumulated in the SC, whereas others passed through the skin very quickly and were quantified in the receptor fluid. The stripping technique allowed us to see that more than 94% of the chemical compound in the SC was in the first eight tapes. The problem of individual values below the limit of detection was raised, a correlation between the two exposure times was found (y = 1.702x - 0.105; R = 0.94) and a classification of products according to their affinity for the SC was determined.     

Clothing reduces the sun protection factor of sunscreens

Background Individuals are recommended to wait for 20 min following sunscreen application before dressing. However, this is probably seldom done in daily life, and therefore we investigated how dressing earlier than 20 min after application affected the sun protection factor (SPF). Objectives To determine the SPF of a sunscreen applied at different amounts at 4, 8 and 20 min before dressing. Methods An organic sunscreen was used on the backs of 22 healthy volunteers. Before SPF testing, participants wore a cotton T‐shirt for 60 min after the test areas had been uncovered for 4, 8 or 20 min after sunscreen application. The SPF was also tested on unclothed skin. Results The median SPF was 11·7 (2 mg cm^?2), 5·7 (1 mg cm^?2) and 3·3 (0·5 mg cm^?2) for unclothed skin, and 8·1 (2 mg cm^?2), 4·8 (1 mg cm^?2) and 2·2 (0·5 mg cm^?2) following an interval of 8 min before dressing. The SPF was similar for time intervals of 20 and 8 min when the amount was 1 mg cm^?2 (P = 0·48) and 2 mg cm^?2 (P = 0·56). For 0·5 mg cm^?2 there was no difference between skin clothed after 20 min and unclothed skin (P = 0·19), nor between skin clothed after 4 min and after 8 min (P = 0·28). Conclusions When sunscreens are applied at amounts of 1 and 2 mg cm^?2 the time between sunscreen application and dressing can be as little as 8 min. When less sunscreen is used the SPF is insensitive to the length of time between application and dressing.     

Durability of the sun protection factor provided by dihydroxyacetone

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: The sunless tanning agent dihydroxyacetone (DHA) is known to protect against longwave ultraviolet radiation (UVA) and visible light. Recently, our laboratory has shown that DHA in addition offers a modest sun protection factor (SPF) in humans. We conducted this study in order to investigate the durability of the SPF provided by DHA. METHODS: Ten healthy volunteers were treated with 20% DHA cream twice in three areas on the volar forearm. One, 5 and 7 days after the second application the participants were phototested with simulated sunlight in each area. Blue reflectance was used to measure the skin coloration by DHA in the test sites. RESULTS: DHA generated a significant SPF of 3.0 at day 1, 2.0 at day 5 and 1.7 at day 7 (P<0.0001). The SPF was positively correlated to the change in blue reflectance (r=0.39, P=0.034). The loss of SPF unit/day was not significantly different between the subjects (P<0.122). However, the intercepts were significantly different (P<0.0001) indicating differences in the initial SPF obtained among the subjects. CONCLUSIONS: The SPF of DHA decreases with the same loss of SPF unit/day between humans and the durability of the SPF thus depends on the initial SPF provided.     

Sunscreen application and its importance for the sun protection factor

To achieve a good sun protection, a layer thickness of 2 mg/sq cm is often recommended. Fifty individuals were asked to apply five different sunscreens ad libitum. Ten percent dihydroxyacetone was added to the sunscreens in order to make them fluoresce when irradiated with Wood's light. The layer thickness was calculated by dividing the amount applied by the area. The thicknesses of the sunscreen layers varied little between different parts of the body and different brands; in general it was close to 1 mg/sq cm. The corresponding protection factor was measured for two sunscreens on 20 persons. The results indicate that the sun protection factor under ad libitum conditions is only 50% of what would be achieved using a layer thickness of 2 mg/sq cm.     

Product application technique alters the sun protection factor.

A number of factors may alter the efficacy of a sunscreen product being tested. Notably among these are (1) the source of ultraviolet (UV) radiation, (2) the filtration of the UV radiation source, (3) such environmental factors as swimming or sweating (4) and/or the amount of product applied. This is the first report in which the technique of product application itself is examined. We find that the act of rubbing the product into the skin appears also to remove product from the skin. In our study, different techniques of product application produced a 25% deviation in product sun protection factor. The variables associated with the application of sunscreening products are discussed.     

Comparison of UVA protection afforded by high sun protection factor sunscreens

UVA protection afforded by 6 different sunscreens with a sun protection factor of 21 or more was compared by means of the persistent pigmentation darkening method. Colorimetric and visual assessment showed significant differences in UV radiation-induced pigmentation at 2 hours. The labeled sun protection factor of the tested sunscreens was not predictive of UVA protection level.     

Machine learning for the prediction of sunscreen sun protection factor and protection grade of UVA

We report a prediction model for sunscreen sun protection factor (SPF) and protection grade of ultraviolet (UV) A (PA) based on machine learning. We illustrate with real clinical test results of UV protection ability of sunscreen for SPF and PA. With approximately 2200 individual clinical results for both SPF and PA level detection, individually, we were able to see that active ingredient information can provide accurate SPF and PA prediction rates through machine learning. Furthermore, we included four new factors—presence of pigment, concentration of pigment grade titanium dioxide, type of formulation and type of product—as additional information for the prediction model and were able to see increased prediction rates as results.     

Multi-laboratory validation of very high sun protection factor values

Background: High sun protection factor (SPF) sunscreens have multiple benefits but there has not been validation of the test method for determining SPF values higher than 50. This study addresses specifically the accuracy and reproducibility of the high SPF test. Methods: Two high SPF formulations with a standard reference (SPF 15) were tested at four independent test facilities according to the 2007 FDA proposed amendments to the sunscreen monograph. Statistical analysis was performed to compare the SPF results within each lab as well as the SPF results between different labs. Results: The test formulations have overall mean values of 90.5 and 70.7. There was no statistically significant difference between the labs for either formulation and all four labs were able to statistically differentiate these two levels of SPF values. The coefficients of variance (CV) for the high SPF formulations were comparable to those of the corresponding SPF 15 reference within each lab. Conclusions: The data show that SPF values above 50 and up to at least 90 can be measured by multiple laboratories with accuracy and reproducibility.     

Lip sun protection factor of a lipstick sunscreen.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: There is a well-documented need for effective human UVA and UVB photoprotection. Since there are important anatomical variations, the sun protection factor (SPF) of a lipstick sunscreen was measured on the anatomical site intended for use. METHODS: The SPF tests were performed according to Federal US and European COLIPA guidelines. Prior to performing a test on the lip, the minimal erythemal dose (MED) of the unprotected back skin was determined. Subsequently, the sunscreen SPF was measured on the anatomical target site (lip). The evaluator was blinded with respect to scoring the SPF of each sunscreen treatment. Individual test sites were assigned to one of the following treatment conditions: (1) no treatment (MED of unprotected skin); (2) test formulation; (3) reference standard. RESULTS: The MED on unprotected back skin was found to be 25% lower than on unprotected lip skin. The SPF of the lipstick sunscreen was measured 2 units lower than the SPF determined in the classical way on the back skin. CONCLUSION: It was hypothesized that the higher MED of the lower lip compared with back skin was due to the adaptation of this tissue to the continuous exposure to UV radiation.     

防晒化妆品日光防护系数与使用剂量的关系

随着人们生活水平的提高,防晒化妆品已经被越来越多的人群所使用.日光防护系数(SPF)是对防晒化妆品防护效果的评价指标,在实验室中检测防晒化妆品SPF值时使用的剂量~([1])为2.0 mg/cm~2,但人们在日常生活中的使用量远低于此剂量.降低使用剂量是否会影响防晒化妆品的防护效果,影响程度有多大?我们对此进行多中心研究.     

The relation between sun protection factor and amount of suncreen applied in vivo

BACKGROUND: The declared sun protection factor (SPF) is based on the use of a sunscreen layer of 2 mg cm(-2). However, only around a quarter (0 x 5 mg cm(-2)) of this amount is applied by sunbathers. Theoretical calculations have suggested that the effective SPF is related to sunscreen quantity in an exponential way but this was not confirmed in vitro and has not been studied in vivo. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the relation between SPF and sunscreen amount in vivo. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: On the backs of 20 healthy volunteers, five areas of 34 cm(2) each were marked. One area was phototested to determine the ultraviolet (UV) sensitivity. Four areas were treated with a sunscreen SPF 4 in different amounts: 0 x 5, 1, 2 and 4 mg cm(-2). Thirty minutes after sunscreen application a phototest was conducted on each area. The effective SPF was calculated 22-26 h after irradiation using the UV dose needed to produce just perceptible erythema (minimal erythema dose) on protected and unprotected skin. RESULTS: In all areas the mean SPF was significantly different from an SPF of 1 (no protection) (P 相似文献