Clinical and Histopathologic Comparative Analysis Between Kidney Transplant Recipients From Expanded-Criteria Donors and Standard-Criteria Donors

Owing to the disparity between the supply of kidney donors and demand, the use of organs from older deceased donors was initiated in recent years. The potentially poor outcome of these grafts is a major concern. This retrospective study compares graft and patient 1-year survivals between recipients from expanded-criteria donors (ECD; n = 30) and standard-criteria donors (SCD; n = 104). Rates of delayed graft function (DGF), acute rejection (AR), and chronic injury in the pre-implantation biopsy were also assessed. Increasing donor age was associated with increased rates of DGF, and DGF correlated with AR. Cold ischemia time >30 hours was associated with worse graft outcomes. Induction with Simulect correlated with better patient survival compared with Timoglobulina. Chronic injury pre-implantation biopsy correlated with worse renal function, but graft survival was similar. Death-censored graft survival at 1 year was 90% and patient survival 82%, and these were similar in ECD and SCD recipients. Selection of transplant candidates for ECD kidneys must be performed with caution. One-year graft survival was similar to that of SCD kidneys, but kidney function was worse during the same period. This may result in poorer graft survival over longer follow-up.     

Renal transplantation in children with emphasis on young patients

We report the results of 41 consecutive renal transplantations performed on 39 children (median age 2.7 years). Twenty-six recipients were less than 5 years old. Twenty-one recipients (13 under the age of 5 years) received cadaver (CAD) grafts. All grafts except 2 were from adult donors and were placed extraperitoneally. Patients were on triple immunosuppression (cyclosporine plus azathioprine plus methylprednisolone). Mean followup time was 2.3 years. No vascular and only one ureteral complication was seen. Acute tubular necrosis occurred in 3 patients (7.3%). No grafts were lost due to acute rejection. Three-year patient survival and 1-year graft survival were 100%. The overall 3-year actuarial graft survival was 86%. Three-year survival of grafts from living-related donors (LRD) was 92% and that of CAD grafts 75%. In recipients younger than 5 years, 3-year LRD graft survival was 89% and CAD graft survival 73%. No significant differences in graft survival between recipients of different age groups or between LRD and CAD grafts were found. We conclude that results of renal transplantation in children under 5 years of age are comparable to those of older children, even using CAD grafts, when adult donors and triple immunosuppression are used.     

Cyclosporine versus azathioprine: a review of 200 consecutive cadaver renal transplant recipients

Most renal transplant centers report an increase in graft survival when cyclosporine is used as a primary immunosuppressant. We report the outcome of 200 consecutive cadaver renal transplant recipients among whom initial immunosuppression and risk factors were similar except for the substitution of cyclosporine for azathioprine in the second 100 recipients. Azathioprine-treated recipients had significantly increased (p less than 0.05) mean hospital stays (31.9 versus 18.3 days), incidence of first rejection episodes (85 versus 31) and methylprednisolone dose (3.38 versus 0.06 gm. per patient). Cyclosporine-treated recipients had a significantly higher 1-year mean serum creatinine level (1.85 versus 1.56 mg. per dl.) and 1-year actual graft survival (83 versus 58 per cent). Despite mild nephrotoxicity, cyclosporine is superior to azathioprine as a primary immunosuppressant in cadaver kidney transplantation.     

Campath-1H (alemtuzumab) as an induction agent for the prevention of graft rejection and preservation of renal function in kidney transplant patients: Philippine 3-year follow-up

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of induction with Campath-1H with low-dose cyclosporine (CsA) monotherapy using outcome measures of acute rejection episodes (ARE), chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN), graft and patient survivals, as well as malignancies and infections. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fourteen kidney transplant recipients were randomized to receive either Campath 1H induction with CsA monotherapy (9 patients) or immunosuppression with CsA, azathioprine, and steroids (5 patients). Campath (20 mg IV) was administered within 6 hours after the anastomosis and repeated 24 hours later. Cyclosporine was started 72 hours after the first Campath dose (10 mg/kg on the first day, then 4 mg/kg/d), seeking to achieve target trough CsA levels of 90 to 110 ng/mL. This is a 3-year follow-up of the 9 patients who received Campath-1H induction. RESULTS: Six of 9 (67%) patients developed ARE (borderline ARE to Banff IB) in the Campath group compared with 1 of 5 (20%) in the other group (ARE Banff IIA). They all received methylprednisolone for 3 days with good responses. One of the 6 patients in the Campath group with ARE also displayed CAN and was converted to sirolimus; 2 others had mycophenolate mofetil and steroids added to their immunosuppression after the ARE. Creatinine levels ranged from 1 to 1.7 mg/dL at 24 to 36 months posttransplantation in both groups. Among the Campath group, 1 patient died 6 months posttransplantation with sepsis secondary to infectious diarrhea. Upper respiratory tract infections comprised the majority of infections at 24 to 36 months. No malignancies were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Three years posttransplantation, patients given Campath induction with CsA monotherapy showed a greater incidence of ARE, although renal function remained comparable to CsA-azathioprine-prednisone therapy. AREs were easily reversed with steriods. Infections were minor.     

Kidney Graft Survival Rates Do Not Improve by Era: The Impact of the Age Factor

We performed this study to evaluate whether older ages of donors and recipients negatively affected long-term graft survival. We compared 5-year graft survival rates of 89 recipients transplanted between 1991 and 1995 (period A) versus 221 recipients transplanted between 1996 and 2000 (period B). Acute rejection rates and the number of donors and recipients >50 years of age were compared in the two periods. The 5-year graft survival rate in period B was 76.3% versus 82% in period A. In period B, the acute rejection incidence was 18% versus 40% in period A (P < .001). The overall 5-year graft survival was 86.2% for donors aged 21-50 years and 65.7% for donor's aged >50 years (P < .0001) in period A versus 84.1% and 68%, respectively, in period B (P = .0023). In period A, 23.6% of donors and 35.9% of recipients were >50 years old, versus 50.2% and 42.9%, respectively, in period B. The graft survival rate in period B was worse than in period A, although the acute rejection rate was lower. The older age of both donors and recipients in period B seemed to be an important cause of worse outcomes.     

Long-term graft outcome of living donor renal transplantation: single center experience

The number of potential renal transplant recipients far exceeds the number of cadaveric donors. For this reason, living-related donors (LRD) and living-unrelated donors (LURD) have been used to decrease the cadaveric donor shortage. We analyzed 571 living donor transplants for 25 years in our center.

Materials and Methods

From 1978 to 2003, 571 patients underwent LRD (n = 253), or LURD (n = 318) kidney transplantation. The patients were divided into precyclosporine era (from 1978 to 1987, n = 44; era I), cyclosporine era (from 1988 to 1997, n = 367, era II), and cyclosporine plus mycophenolate-mofetil era (from 1998 to 2003, n = 160, era III). We compared the graft survival rate of the recipients according to the immunosuppressants, analyzing the variables of donor and recipient age, sex, HLA matching, and acute rejection rate. We also compared long-term survival rates between LRD and LURD.

Results

The 1- and 10-year graft survival rates of all patients were 93.4% and 77.4%, respectively. The 1- and 10- year graft survival rates were 75.0% and 36.3% in era I; and 94.8 % and 80.2% in era II. The 1- and 5-year graft survival rates were 96.6% and 93.3% in era III (P < .001). The occurrence rate of an acute rejection episode was 11.4% (era I), 21.8% (era II), and 14.4% (era III) (P = .056). The 1- and 5-year graft survival rates were 92.3% and 81.7% among LRD transplants, and 94.2% and 86.9% among LURD transplants, respectively (P = .122).

Discussion

The graft survival rates of living-donor transplants are improving due to advances in patient care and new immunosuppressive agents.     

Reversal of acute cellular rejection after renal transplantation with Campath-1H

Between September 2002 and February 2004, 40 kidney transplant (27 from deceased and 13 from living donors) recipients (25 male and 15 female, aged 50.3 +/- 15.1 years) were treated with Campath 1H (C 1H; 30 mg/dose IV) for biopsy-proven steroid-resistant rejection (SRR) or rejections equal to or worse than Banff 1B. All transplantations occurred between August 2001 and May 2003. All patients had received antibody preconditioning (RATG 5 mg/kg, n = 34; C 1H 60 mg, n = 4; C 1H 30 mg, n = 2) preoperatively and were treated with Tacrolimus monotherapy (target level 10 ng/ml) postoperatively and subsequent spaced weaning. Elevated creatinine levels at follow-up were evaluated by renal transplant biopsy. Rejection was treated with steroids, reversal of weaning, addition of sirolimus, and/or antibody treatment, depending on grade of rejection. The mean duration of follow-up was 453 +/- 163 days after C 1H administration. Twenty-nine patients received C 1H for SRR and 11 patients for Banff 1B or worse rejections; 26 patients received more than 1 dose of C 1H. Graft survival was 62.5% (25 patients); 6 of the 15 allografts (40%) that failed had presented with rejections because of noncompliance. Graft survival in compliant patients with SRR or rejections equal to or worse than Banff 1B was 73.5% (25 of 34). Fourteen patients (35%) had infectious complications, of whom 2 patients (5%) died. C 1H is an effective agent for SRR and Banff 1B or worse rejections, with 95% patient survival and 73.5% graft survival (in compliant patients). The number of doses of 30 mg C 1H should be restricted to two, as there is a high incidence of potentially fatal infectious complications.     

Ethnic differences in clinical response to corticosteroid treatment of acute renal allograft rejection

BACKGROUND: Limited in vitro data suggest that African-Americans exhibit greater resistance to corticosteroids than do non-African-American transplant recipients. However, ethnic differences in clinical response to corticosteroids for treatment of acute rejection have not been investigated previously. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical response to corticosteroid treatment for acute rejection in both African-American and non-African-American renal allograft recipients. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 497 consecutive renal allograft recipients to identify patients who had received corticosteroids as initial treatment of acute rejection. One hundred and twenty patients who received corticosteroids for treatment of acute rejection were evaluated in this analysis. The study population was divided into two groups: the African-American group (n=73) and non-African-American group (n=47). All acute rejection episodes were documented by biopsy and were classified as mild-moderate histologically. Corticosteroid therapy consisted of either methylprednisolone, 500 mg intravenously for 3 days, or oral prednisone, 2 mg/kg/day rapidly tapered over 3 weeks. RESULTS: Twenty-six percent (26%) of African-Americans were considered corticosteroid treatment failures compared to an 8.0% failure rate among non-African-Americans (P<0.05). One-year graft survival was 78% in African-American versus 96% in non-African-American (P<0.05). Among African-American and non-African-American recipients, 1-year patient survival rates were 97% and 100, respectively (P=NS). CONCLUSIONS: African-American patients exhibit higher failure rates with corticosteroid treatment of acute rejection. Alternative anti-rejection therapies may need to be considered for this "high-risk" patient population to improve long-term graft survival.     

Tacrolimus plus low-dose mycophenolate mofetil in renal transplant recipients: better 2-year graft and patient survival than with a higher mycophenolate mofetil dose

OBJECTIVES: Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has become more widely prescribed in recent years, but its adverse effects on the gastrointestinal system and bone marrow restrict its use in certain settings. The aim of this study was to compare the demographic features and clinical data for 173 renal transplant recipients who received tacrolimus (TAC) plus 1 g/d MMF (group I, n = 112) versus TAC plus 2 g/d MMF (group II, n = 61 patients) over a 2-year period. Each patient received similar TAC doses. METHODS: We compared demographic data and clinical data for each case: acute rejection (AR) episodes, chronic rejection (CR) episodes, death, graft loss, development of posttransplantation diabetes mellitus (PTDM), and posttransplantation hypertension rates. RESULTS: Demographic features were similar. There were also no significant differences between groups I and II with respect to number of AR episodes (17/112 vs 12/61, respectively), number of CR episodes (4/112 vs 1/61, respectively), PTDM, and hypertension rate (P > .05). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed 2-year graft survival rates of 94% in group I versus 83% in group II. The corresponding 2-year patient survival rates were 100% in group I versus 91% in group II. The graft survival and patient survival rates in group I were significantly higher than those in group II (log-rank 0.005 and 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The 2-year graft and patient survival rates for the renal transplant recipients in this study suggest that the combination of a full TAC dose with 1 g/d MMF is a better choice than 2 g/d MMF.     

Early outcomes in human lung transplantation with Thymoglobulin or Campath-1H for recipient pretreatment followed by posttransplant tacrolimus near-monotherapy

OBJECTIVES: Acute and chronic rejection remain unresolved problems after lung transplantation, despite heavy multidrug immunosuppression. In turn, the strong immunosuppression has been responsible for mortality and pervasive morbidity. It also has been postulated to interdict potential mechanisms of alloengraftment. METHODS: In 48 lung recipients we applied 2 therapeutic principles: (1) recipient pretreatment with antilymphoid antibody preparations (Thymoglobulin [SangStat, Fremont, Calif] or Campath [alemtuzumab; manufactured by ILEX Pharmaceuticals, LP, San Antonio, Tex; distributed by Berlex Laboratories, Richmond, Calif]) and (2) minimal posttransplant immunosuppression with tacrolimus monotherapy or near-monotherapy. Our principal analysis was of the events during the critical first 6 posttransplant months of highest immunologic and infectious disease risk. Results were compared with those of 28 historical lung recipients treated with daclizumab induction and triple immunosuppression (tacrolimus-prednisone-azathioprine). RESULTS: Recipient pretreatment with both antilymphoid preparations allowed the use of postoperative tacrolimus monotherapy with prevention or control of acute rejection. Freedom from rejection was significantly greater with Campath than with Thymoglobulin (P = .03) or daclizumab (P = .05). After lymphoid depletion with Thymoglobulin or Campath, patient and graft survival at 6 months was 90% or greater. Patient and graft survival after 9 to 24 months is 84.2% in the Thymoglobulin cohort, and after 10 to 12 months, it is 90% in the Campath cohort. There has been a subjective improvement in quality of life relative to our historical experience. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that improvements in lung transplantation can be accomplished by altering the timing, dosage, and approach to immunosuppression in ways that might allow natural mechanisms of alloengraftment and diminish the magnitude of required maintenance immunosuppression.     

Avoidance of Chronic Steroid Therapy in African American Kidney Transplant Recipients Monitored by Surveillance Biopsy: 1-Year Results

African American (AA) kidney recipients receive chronic steroid therapy to improve outcomes, despite their high susceptibility to side effects, particularly diabetes and hypertension. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of avoidance of chronic steroid therapy in AA compared to non-AA kidney recipients. Two hundred and six kidney recipients were studied; 103 AA recipients versus 103 non-AA recipients. Induction was basiliximab and maintenance was a calcineurin inhibitor plus mycophenolate mofetil or sirolimus. Surveillance biopsies were preformed at 1, 6 and 12 months to assess subclinical acute rejection (SCAR) and chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN). Biopsy-proven acute rejection (AR) and SCAR were treated by methylprednisolone. The primary end point was AR. Secondary end points were graft function, 1-year patient and graft survival. AR was observed in 16% of AA and 13% of non-AA recipients. SCAR at 1 month was significantly higher in the AA group (p=0.04). One-year actual patient and graft survival in the AA group was 96% and 88% and in the non-AA group 97% and 89%, respectively. Avoidance of chronic steroid therapy directed by surveillance biopsies provides equivalent AR, CAN and 1-year patient and graft survival in AA versus non-AA recipients and a 5% incidence of new onset diabetes mellitus. All recipients remain free of chronic steroid therapy. Longer-term follow-up is ongoing.     

Intermediate outcomes of dual renal allografts: the University of Washington experience

PURPOSE: The increased survival advantage of renal transplantation with end stage renal disease combined with an increasing incidence of renal disease fuel an increasing disparity between supply and demand for transplantable kidneys. Despite efforts to increase cadaveric organ donation through education and publicity, the number of cadaveric kidneys transplanted has not increased and in the last year was surpassed by kidneys transplanted from living donors. In an effort to maximize cadaver organ donors use of kidneys from expanded criteria donors has been investigated. In select cases both donor kidneys have been transplanted into a single recipient, which is called dual renal transplant. We report on the 4-year dual renal transplant graft and patient outcomes and compare these to age matched single cadaver kidney transplants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of 10 dual renal transplant recipients and 10 age matched single cadaver kidney recipients was performed. All patients underwent transplantation at our university between January 1996 and February 1998. Mean followup was 4.1 years (range 2.5 to 5.1) for the dual kidney recipients and 3.6 (0.0 to 5.5) years for the control group. RESULTS: Of the 10 dual renal transplant recipients 7 remain alive and 3 died of nontransplant related causes. Of the 10 single recipients 8 are alive, 1 died of postoperative complications and 1 died of nontransplant related causes. When censored for death with a functioning graft, 7 of 10 dual grafts are functioning at followup with a mean creatinine clearance of 39.4 ml. per minute (range 16.1 to 65.9) and mean serum creatinine of 2.0 mg./dl. (1.1 to 3.9). If not censored for death with a functioning graft, 50% of dual grafts are functioning. Of the 3 graft losses 2 were due to recurrent disease and 1 was attributed to chronic rejection. In the control group 8 of 10 grafts are functioning at current followup (regardless of censoring for death with a functioning graft) with a mean creatinine clearance of 48.7 ml. per minute (range 23.4 to 66.5) and mean serum creatinine of 1.6 mg./dl. (1.2 to 2.4). Of the 2 graft losses 1 resulted from postoperative complications and 1 was due to chronic rejection. CONCLUSIONS At the 4-year followup patients undergoing dual renal transplant have comparable graft function, incidence of graft loss and survival compared to the control group. However, because of our small sample size, differences in the 2 groups may be significant in a larger study. Additional studies need to be conducted to determine if this practice represents an acceptable use of kidneys from expanded criteria donors.     

Calcineurin inhibitor avoidance versus steroid avoidance following kidney transplantation: Postoperative complications

This study compared early postoperative complications in kidney transplant recipients treated with either a sirolimus-based calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-free regimen or a tacrolimus-based steroid-free regimen. We used a single-center, prospective, sequential but nonrandomized study design. Consecutive recipients of primary cadaveric or non-HLA identical kidney transplant recipients received either a CNI-free regimen, consisting of sirolimus 5 mg daily beginning postoperative day 3, mycophenolate mofetil 1 gm twice a day, and methylprednisolone 500 mg intraoperatively, then prednisone 30 mg daily tapered to 10 mg daily at 3 months, or a prednisone-free regimen, consisting of methylprednisolone 500 mg, 250 mg, and 125 mg from days 0 to 2, then no further steroids, tacrolimus 0.075 mg/kg twice a day, and mycophenolate mofetil 1 g twice a day. All patients received thymoglobulin induction 6 mg/kg total dose. Outcome measures were patient and graft survival, BPAR, surgical and wound complications, viral infections and posttransplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM). Both groups had excellent early outcomes with no significant difference in patient or graft survival, early renal function, BPAR, surgical or wound complications, or viral infections between the two groups. Patients in the sirolimus-based CNI-free group had a significantly higher incidence of PTDM and a trend toward more discontinuation due to drug toxicity. Whether either regimen improves long-term outcomes awaits longer follow-up.     

Steroid-free tacrolimus monotherapy after pretransplantation thymoglobulin or Campath and laparoscopy in living donor renal transplantation

Living donor renal transplantation was performed under a regimen of recipient pretreatment and low-dose postoperative immunosuppression with subsequent weaning. From October 9, 2002, to December 31, 2004, 196 consecutive, unselected laparoscopic live donor nephrectomies resulting in 196 living donor renal transplantations were performed. Recipients were pretreated with rabbit antithymocyte globulin (thymoglobulin; 24 patients or [12%]) or Campath 1H (alemtuzumab; 166 patients [85%]), or were not in protocol (6 patients [3%]), and were given postoperative steroid-free low-dose tacrolimus immunosuppressive monotherapy with subsequent weaning. There was no donor mortality. Major and minor donor morbidities were 2.6% and 4.2%, respectively. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy recipient outcomes with a mean follow-up of 401 days included (1) recipient and graft survival of 99.0% and 97.4%, respectively; (2) no ureteral stenosis; (3) 0.5% delayed graft function, from recurrent focal segmental glomerulosclinosis; and (4) no vascular thrombosis. The incidence of acute rejection at 30, 90, and 401 days was 1.5%, 3.8%, and 11.2% (all 196 recipients), 0%, 25%, and 29.2% (thymoglobulin recipients), and 1.8%, 3.9%, and 8.4% (Campath 1H recipients), respectively. Sixty-six patients (33.7%) are receiving spaced-dose immunosuppressive monotherapy. The mean creatinine concentration in all recipients was 1.5 +/- 1.1 mg/dL. There were no instances of cytomegalovirus tissue invasive disease or posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disease. The incidence of new-onset posttransplantation insulin-dependent diabetes was 0.5%. At current follow-up, the use of Campath 1H rather than thymoglobulin for pretreatment seems to have significantly improved the efficacy of our regimen.     

Donor pretreatment in an unselected series of cadaver renal allografts.

In a single center, an unselected non-exclusion series of 78 consecutive cadaver renal allografts in 76 recipients was studied. Since 1971, using kidneys obtained from donors pretreated with large doses of cyclophosphamide and methylprednisolone, excellent clinical results with 2-year graft-survival of 70% 5-year graft survival of 66% have been obtained. The improvement in results is believed to be aided by the reduction in allograft immunogenicity due to short-term donor pretreatment. In this series, poor tissue-matching grades are notable, heavily transfused patients are few, 33 patients were high risk, and 43 patients were presensitized. In spite of these negative selection factors, the results obtained in this pretreated series, with 18% of graft losses due to rejection, are superior to those obtained in patients who did not receive pretreated allografts during the same time period, with 34% of graft losses due to rejection, and 2-year and 5-year graft survivals of 57% and 53%, respectively.     

Expanding the living related donor pool in renal transplantation: use of marginal donors

PURPOSE: In a living related transplantation program it is not always possible to find an ideal donor. Sometimes the only available donor in the family has some benign disease or suboptimal renal anatomy or physiology, or is too old to be accepted and defined as a marginal donor. However, with proper screening the donor pool can be increased by accepting these marginal donors and treating the benign diseases which is beneficial to the donor. We evaluate the outcome of grafts from marginal donors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From July 1988 to August 1997, 581 live related transplantations were performed. Of the donors 52 were older than 60 years and 34 had associated benign renal or nonrenal anomaly or disease. These donors were accepted after thorough questioning and consultation with family members. The recipients of graft from elderly donors were evaluated for the number of rejections, serum creatinine at last followup and graft survival. RESULTS: Of the recipients 52 received grafts from elderly donors with a mean age of 62.6+/-3.7 years. Mean followup was 34.14+/-0.7 months. The 2 and 5-year actuarial graft survival was 96% and 74%, respectively. Creatinine was normal (less than 1.5) in 37% of recipients and 1.5 to 2.5 mg.% in 46%. The rejection rate in postoperative month 1 was 29%. All donors underwent simultaneous surgery to treat the benign disease, and all did well after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: By accepting these marginal donors a 14.6% increase in the living related donor pool was achieved without compromising recipient or donor safety. Otherwise these recipients would have been forced to undergo unrelated transplantation or be maintained on dialysis, which is particularly difficult in a developing country. Donors with associated disease benefited from cure.     

Living-Unrelated Donor Renal Transplantation: An Alternative to Living-Related Donor Transplantation?

INTRODUCTION

An increasing number of living-unrelated, kidney donor transplants are being performed in our unit. We present a comparison of living-unrelated (LURD) and living-related donor (LRD) renal transplant outcomes and analyse influencing factors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analysed the outcome of all living-donor renal transplants performed at our centre from 1993 to 2004. The parameters studied included patient and graft survival, functioning status of grafts (determined by estimated GFR) at last follow-up and any rejection episodes. Multivariate analysis was performed for recipient and donor age, ethnicity, HLA matching and re-transplants.

RESULTS

A total of 322 live donor kidney transplants (LRD, n = 261; LURD, n = 61) were carried out over this period. Mean recipient age was 28 ± 16 years in the LRD group and 48 ± 12 years in LURD, while mean age of the donors was 43 ± 11 years and 48 ± 10 years, respectively. Caucasians constituted 80% of all the living donors. Amongst LRD, parents were the commonest (58%) donors followed by siblings (35%). In LURD, 80% were spouses. A total of 33 grafts failed, 30 in LRD (11%) and 3 in LURD (5%). Thirteen patients died, 11 (4.2%) in LRD (7 with functioning graft) and 2 (3.3%) in LURD (1 with functioning graft). Acute rejections occurred in 41% recipients in LRD and 35% in LURD (P = 0.37). Estimated GFR was lower in LURD than in LRD (49 ± 14 versus 59 ± 29 ml/min/1.73 m²; P = 0.032). One- and 3-year patient survival for LRD and LURD was 98.7% and 96.3% and 97.7% and 95%, respectively (P = 0.75). One- and 3-year graft survival was equivalent at 94.8% and 92.3% for LRD, and 98.4% and 93.7% for LURD, respectively (P = 0.18).

CONCLUSIONS

Outcome of LRD and LURD is comparable in terms of patient and graft survival, acute rejection rate and estimated GFR despite differences in demographics, HLA matching and re-transplants of recipients.     

Renal cadaveric transplantation in diabetics using total lymphoid irradiation or cyclosporin A: A controlled randomized study

Abstract. A total of 20 renal transplant patients with end-stage diabetic nephropathy entered a randomized controlled trial comparing preoperative, fractionated total lymphoid irradiation (TLI) (radiation dose, 20–30 Gy) with postoperative cyclosporin A (CsA). Both groups received postoperative low-dose methylprednisolone maintenance therapy. The 3-year patient and graft survival was similar for both groups (100% and 71% in the TLI and 75% and 75% in the CsA group, respectively). Rejection crises occurred significantly more frequently ( P < 0.01) in the TLI-treated recipients. The incidence of infectious or diabetic complications was not significantly different in both groups. It is concluded that TLI and CsA are both effective treatment modalities for cadaveric renal transplantation in diabetics; CsA, however, is superior in preventing rejection crises.     

Dual kidney transplants from very old or very young donors: long-term outcomes and complications

The disparity between donors and the demand for organ transplants grows steadily. Annually, 4700 patients die on the kidney transplant waiting list in the United States. To increase utilization of deceased donor organs, we expanded our acceptable criteria to include very old (VO) or very young (VY) donors. We transplanted both such kidneys (dual transplant) into a single recipient and evaluated the long-term outcomes and complications. From July 2001 to December 2005, 16 patients (mean age 68, range 60-78) received dual kidneys from VO (mean age 72, range 60-79) donors and 6 patients (mean age 47, range 27-72) were transplanted from VY (mean age 17 months, range 2-36) donors. Seventy-four percent of these kidneys were imported after rejection by their local center due to low glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and extreme age. One- and 5-year patient survival rates were 100% and 88%, respectively. Death-censored 1- and 5-year graft survival rates for recipient of VO kidneys were 95% and 93%, and 66% and 50% for recipients of VY kidneys, respectively. Five-year graft survival rate for recipients of VO donor kidneys was 93% and was equal to the survival of standard deceased donor (SCD) kidney transplants (87%). The 5-year survival of dual transplants from VO donors was higher than expanded criteria deceased donor (ECD; P = .05). Over a mean follow-up of 66 ± 28 months, rejection rates were 10%, not statistically different than other groups. Of 22 dual transplants, four patients experienced urinary tract infections; three developed incisional subcutaneous seromas, and there were more urinary leaks compared to SCD (13.6% vs 2%, P = .002). The average 1- and 5-year estimated GFR (Cockcroft-Gault) was 57.4 and 54.6 mL/min, respectively. When properly placed in a single patient, such marginal organs are a valuable resource that offer comparable outcomes to SCD transplants and superior outcomes to ECD organs.     

High- versus low-dose methylprednisolone for acute rejection episodes in renal transplantation

A double-blind, randomized trial was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of two doses of methylprednisolone (MP) in reversing acute rejection episodes in renal allograft recipients. 18 subjects were randomized to receive either 250 mg (group 1) or 1,000 mg (group 2) MP daily for 4 days. The two groups were similar with regard to HLA matching, number of cadaveric grafts, number of second transplants, and transfusion history. 6 of 10 patients in group 1 and 4 of 8 in group 2 responded to treatment with MP, i.e., serum creatinine returned to baseline. 1-year follow-up has demonstrated a similar graft survival, 70% in group 1 and 50% in group 2. There were no significant differences in mortality, infectious complications, blood glucose, and blood pressure between the two groups. We conclude that (1) 250 mg MP is as effective as 1,000 mg in reversing acute rejection in renal allografts; (2) 1,000 mg MP does not result in a greater incidence of adverse effects, and (3) 250 mg MP does not adversely affect 1-year graft survival.