Prediction of Renal Function After Living Donor Kidney Transplantation

There is no reliable method to predict the ideal expected function after a kidney transplantation. Herein we have described our experience in the living donor kidney transplant setting, comparing donor and recipient renal function (body surface area adjusted) before the LDKT, and during six months after this procedure. We determined the expected relation between donor and recipient renal function as well as its evolution over time.     

Sirolimus Prolongs Recovery from Delayed Graft Function After Cadaveric Renal Transplantation

Sirolimus, lacking known nephrotoxicity, appeared to be an ideal immunosuppressive agent in the setting of delayed graft function (DGF) after renal transplantation. Coincident with our use of sirolimus however, we noticed prolongation of DGF. To investigate possible causes of prolonged DGF, extensive donor, recipient, transplant, and post-transplant data were collected on 132 consecutive cases of DGF at the University of California, San Francisco between 1/1/97 and 6/30/01. Cox proportional hazards analysis of time to graft function was used in univariate and multivariate models to identify factors that prolong DGF. Sirolimus had a large and highly significant effect on time to graft function (hazard ratio 0.48, p = 0.0007). The hazard ratio indicates that a recipient on sirolimus is half as likely to resolve DGF or twice as likely to remain on dialysis as a recipient without sirolimus. Two other factors had less potent but still significant association with DGF duration: recipient sensitization (hazard ratio 0.66, p = 0.037), and Novartis score (hazard ratio 0.93 per 1.0 increase; p = 0.034). Sirolimus retained its profound negative association with time to graft function in all multivariate models. Because sirolimus appears to prolong DGF, it may not be the optimal immunosuppressive choice in the DGF setting.     

Change in Renal Function After Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy for Kidney Transplantation

Background

Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) has become the method of choice for living-donor kidney transplantation. However, LDN may result in decreased renal function in the donor, and risk of end-stage renal failure has been reported.

Objective

To evaluate changes in renal function after LDN.

Patients and Methods

The study included 51 living donors of renal transplants between March 2002 and December 2008. Before kidney donation, we computed the initial function of the kidney preserved in the donor using 24-hour creatinine clearance (Ccr) and functional ratio as revealed at technetium 99m dimercaptosuccinic acid renal scanning. After kidney donation, serum creatinine concentration (sCr) and Ccr were calculated on postoperative day 2 and every 3 months thereafter.

Results

After LDN, mean sCr increased immediately, from 0.90 to 1.31, as did Ccr of the kidney preserved in the donor, from 58.2 to 79.6, a 36.9% increase. A greater percent increase in function was observed in younger donors and those with lower initial Ccr of the preserved kidney. Although 9.8% of donors demonstrated slightly decreased renal function of the preserved kidney at last follow-up, renal function was adequately preserved in most donors.

Conclusion

Younger donors and those with lower initial function of the preserved kidney before nephrectomy demonstrate a greater increase in function after nephrectomy. Age might be a risk factor for decreased renal function after LDN. Older potential living donors may need more careful evaluation before kidney donation.     

Early Graft Function After Living Donor Kidney Transplantation Predicts Rejection But Not Outcomes

Poor early graft function (EGF) after deceased donor kidney transplantation (DDKT) has been intensely studied. Much less is known about poor EGF after living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT). Data were collected on 469 LDKTs performed between 1/1/97 and 12/31/01 to determine risk factors for and outcomes associated with poor EGF, defined as either delayed or slow graft function (DGF or SGF). The incidence of DGF and SGF were 4.7% and 10.7%, respectively. Diabetic etiology (OR 2.22; p = 0.021) and warm ischemia time (WIT) (OR 1.05 per min increment; p = 0.0025) emerged as independently associated with poor EGF. Neither functional graft survival nor 1-year graft function differed among the EGF groups. However, DGF and SGF strongly predisposed to acute rejection (AR), which compromised functional graft survival (p = 0.0007) and 1-year graft function. Therefore, we conclude that diabetic etiology of renal disease and WIT are the dominant risk factors for poor EGF after LDKT. Poor EGF did not directly compromise functional graft survival but strongly predisposed to AR. We suggest that immunosuppression should be intensified in the poor EGF setting to maximize LDKT longevity, as AR does impair functional graft survival.     

Effect of Donor Factors on Early Graft Survival in Adult Cadaveric Renal Transplantation

Previous studies of the effect of donor factors on renal transplant outcomes have not tested the role of recipient body mass index, donor/recipient weight ratios and age matching, and other factors. We analyzed 20,309 adult (age 16 or older) recipients having solitary cadaveric renal transplants from adult donors from 1 July 1994 to 30 June 1998 in an historical cohort study (the 2000 United States Renal Data System) of death censored graft loss by the Cox proportional hazards models, which corrected for characteristics thought to affect outcomes. The only independently significant findings in Cox Regression analysis were a high donor/ recipient age ratio (> or = 1.10, e.g. a 55-year-old donor given to a recipient age 50years or younger, adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) 3.22, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.36-4.39) and African American donor kidneys (AHR 1.64, 95% CI, 1.24-2.17). African American recipients and older donors were not at independently increased risk of graft failure in this model. Among donor factors, older donor kidneys given to younger recipients and donor African American kidneys were independently associated with graft loss in recipients of cadaver kidneys. The task for the transplant community should be to find the best means for managing all donor organs without discouraging organ donation.     

Analysis of Pre-transplant Resuscitation Factors Influencing Immediate Graft Function After Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation

Background

The management of a deceased donor in the intensive care unit before organ transplantation is important for the outcome of the recipient. Herein, we analyze the pre-transplant resuscitation factors managed before procurement that could influence graft function immediately after deceased-donor kidney transplantation (DDKT).

Age Matching Improves Graft Survival After Living Donor Kidney Transplantation

Background

Donor and recipient age in kidney transplantation are known to affect graft and patient survival. To address the question of whether the age difference between donor and recipient impacts on graft survival and death-censored graft survival after transplantation, we examined the impact of age matching (less than 10-year age difference) on the survivals after living donor kidney transplantation.

Methods

Two hundred one cases of the primary living donor kidney transplantation were performed and were divided into two groups, age-matched (n = 123) versus age-discrepant (n = 78). Variables included in this study were age, gender, body weight, height, kidney disease, type and duration of dialysis before transplantation, degree of human leukocyte antigen mismatch, ischemic time, graft weight, episode of rejection, type of immunosuppression, recipient serum creatinine after transplantation, and causes of patient death and graft loss.

Results

We observed the disparities of graft survival (P = .008) and death-censored graft survival (P = .003) between the groups. One-, 3-, and 5-year death-censored graft survival was 100%, 100%, and 97% in the age-matched group, respectively; and 97%, 90%, and 88% in the age-discrepant group, respectively. By Cox regression multivariate analysis, the variable of age-matching was an independent predictor for both graft survival (ß = 1.325, P = .017) and death-censored graft survival (ß = 2.217, P = .021).

Conclusion

During living donor and recipient matching, age difference between donor and recipient should be minimized.     

Impact of Donor Dopamine on Immediate Graft Function after Kidney Transplantation

Optimizing medical donor management may have a considerable impact on transplantation outcome. This study investigated the effect of donor dopamine on initial graft function in renal allograft recipients, involving 254 consecutive recipients of a cadaver kidney, aged 18-74 years, transplanted between 1990 and 2003. Immunosuppression was based on cyclosporine. Patients were grouped according to donor use of dopamine during intensive care. Delayed graft function (DGF), and serial creatinine concentrations were compared between the groups. Dopamine-treated and -untreated donors were very similar regarding hemodynamics and renal function. Delayed graft function occurred in 47/158 treated and 48/96 untreated kidneys (p = 0.001). Donor dopamine was associated with a more rapid decrease of s-creatinine, which became obvious on the first postoperative day. Of patients in the treated and untreated group, respectively, 81.9% and 65.8% reached a s-creatinine level less than 2 mg/dL during the first month (p = 0.005). Donor dopamine remained predictive of a normalized s-creatinine level [HR 1.71; 95% CI 1.22-2.41] after controlling for confounding factors by multivariate Cox regression. Donor dopamine is associated with improvements of initial graft function after kidney transplantation. The beneficial effect of dopamine is achievable without side-effects for the recipients, and correlates with superior long-term graft survival.     

Donor Scoring System for Cadaveric Renal Transplantation

We studied early renal function in 241 consecutive patients who received cadaveric renal transplants at two different transplantation centers (group 1, n = 90; group 2, n = 151). Univariate and multivariate analyses of data from group 1 showed a significant correlation between seven donor variables and early renal function after cadaveric renal transplantation. A scoring system was developed from these seven donor variables (cause of death, 0-6 points; history of hypertension, 0-6; final creatinine clearance before procurement, 0-6; age, 0-6; history of diabetes mellitus, 0-3; cold ischemia time, 0-3; and severity of renal artery plaque, 0-3). Data from group 2 were used to validate the donor scoring system and stratify cadaver kidneys on the basis of score: grade A, 0-5 points; grade B, 6-10; grade C, 11-15; and grade D, 16-32. A significant decline in early renal function was observed with increasing donor score and grade of cadaver kidney. In conclusion, a donor scoring system based on information available at the time of procurement can be used to estimate early graft function after cadaveric renal transplantation and may assist in the allocation of marginal organs.     

The Impact of Donor Factors on Early Graft Function in Kidney Transplantation From Donation After Cardiac Death

Donation after cardiac death (DCD) has the potential to significantly increase the number of organ donors. In this study, we investigate the influence of several donor parameters on the early graft function in kidney transplantation from DCD donors. We performed 58 kidney transplantations from DCD donors. Recipients were divided into 2 groups according to their graft function: normal graft function (NGF), patients who became be free of hemodialysis within 14 days post-transplantation) and delayed graft function (DGF) group, patients who required hemodialysis for longer than 15 days after transplantation). We compared donor age, sex, cause of death, warm and total ischemic time, duration of anuria (urine volume < 10 mL/h), and low blood pressure (systolic blood pressure < 60 mm Hg), usage of catecholamine and vasopressin, serum creatinine on the day of admission and graft retrieval, serum sodium concentration, and body temperature between 2 groups. The number of recipients in NGF and DGF group was 41 and 17. Univariate analysis revealed that duration of anuria (<24 vs ≥24 hours) and usage of catecholamine significantly influenced graft function. Duration of anuria was an independent risk factor for early graft function by multivariate analysis. In cadaveric kidney transplantation from DCD donors, there was a trend to poorer early graft function with donors who suffered from anuria for longer than 24 hours before kidney retrieval.     

Donor Kidney Adapts to Body Dimensions of Recipient: No Influence of Donor Gender on Renal Function After Transplantation

Female kidneys and kidneys from small donors have been suggested to perform worse after kidney transplantation. Here, we evaluate the impact of gender and body dimensions on posttransplantation GFR in living donor transplantation. Two hundred and ninety‐three donor–recipient pairs, who were transplanted at our center were evaluated. All pairs had detailed renal function measurement (¹²⁵I‐iothalamate and ¹³¹I‐hippuran) 4 months predonation in the donor and 2.5 months posttransplantation in donor and recipient. For 88 pairs, 5 years of recipient follow‐up was available. Delta GFR was calculated as (recipient GFR–donor single kidney GFR). Recipients of both male and female kidneys had similar renal function at early and long term after transplantation. Male recipients had higher ERPF, ΔGFR and ΔERPF at both time points. Kidneys of donors smaller than their recipient had higher ΔGFR and ΔERPF than kidneys of larger donors at both time points (p < 0.05). In multivariate analysis, ΔGFR was predicted by donor/recipient BSA‐ratio together with transplantation related factors (R² 0.19), irrespective of donor and recipient gender. In conclusion, in living donor transplantation, female kidneys perform as well as male donor kidneys. Kidneys adapt to the recipient's body size and demands, independent of gender, without detrimental effects in renal function and outcome up to mid‐long term.     

Impact of Early Hospital Readmissions After Kidney Transplantation on Graft Function

Early hospital readmissions are common after kidney transplantation. This single-center retrospective study investigated the relationship between early hospital readmissions and clinical outcomes. All adult patients receiving a kidney transplant at this center between March 2009 and June 2015 were included. The early hospital readmissions within the first 30 days were numbered, and the diagnosis was ascertained. The patients were divided into None and Readmission groups. Clinical outcomes and patient- and death-censored graft survival were compared. Among the 103 patients included in the study, 32 (31.1%) had 1 or more readmissions within 30 days. Surgical complications, electrolyte imbalance, and acute rejection were common causes of readmission. No differences were observed in baseline characteristics between the two groups. Patients with early readmissions exhibited low renal function at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively (P = .002, .020, and .013, respectively). No difference in graft function was found 12 months after transplantation between the None and Readmission groups. Five-year graft and patient survival also showed no difference between the two groups (P?=?.424 and .442, respectively). In conclusion, early readmission after kidney transplantation affected lower graft function until 1 year after kidney transplantation. However, the long-term effect on graft function is limited in this study.     

The First Year Renal Function as a Predictor of Long-Term Graft Survival After Kidney Transplantation

This study examined the impact of graft function at the end of the first year after kidney transplantation on long-term graft survival. We analyzed the roles of serum creatinine (Scr) and other variables as predictors of graft survival among 235 adult kidney transplant patients. The subjects were divided into 3 groups according to their Scr at the end of the first year: group 1, Scr < 100 μmol/L; group 2, 100 μmol/L ≤ Scr ≤ 150 μmol/L; and group 3, Scr >150 μmol/L. The annual rate of graft loss of 0.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.63-0.77) in group 1, was lower than those in group 2 (2.1%; 95% CI, 2.02-2.18; P < .0001) and group 3 (6%; 5.74-6.26; P < .0001). Regression analysis showed the role of recipient age at the time of operation, and Scr level at the end of the first year to be independent predictors of graft loss. Graft survival was not influenced by any other studied parameter, including donor age, year of procedure, warm ischemia time, history of acute tubular necrosis, and occurrence of an acute rejection episode. We conclude that the 1-year Scr value predicts long-term renal graft survival, representing a simple, practical tool to identify recipients with an high risk for late graft failure.     

Rate,Factors, and Outcome of Delayed Graft Function After Kidney Transplantation of Deceased Donors

BackgroundDelayed graft function (DGF) is a frequent complication after kidney transplantation affecting long-term outcome.Patients and methodsA total of 525 consecutive recipients (age 54.2 ± 13.4 years, 33% female) of kidneys from deceased donors transplanted between 2005 and 2012 were retrospectively examined. DGF was defined as the need of dialysis within the first week after transplantation.ResultsDGF developed in 21.1% (n = 111). Factors associated with DGF (P ≤ .035, respectively) were recipient body mass index, C-reactive protein of the recipient, residual diuresis, cold ischemia time, donor age, and diuresis in the first hour after transplantation. Median duration of DGF was 16 (2-66) days. Patients after DGF had a significantly lower GFR compared with recipients without DGF either after 3 (32.9 ± 16.5 vs 46.3 ± 18.4 mL/min/1.73 m²) or after 12 months (38.9 ± 19.3 vs 48.6 ± 20.4 mL/min/1.73 m², P < .001, resp.). During DGF, 12.4% developed BANFF II and 18.0% BANFF I rejection, 20.2% had signs of transplant glomerulitis (first biopsy), and 16.2% (n = 18) remained on dialysis.ConclusionDGF affects 1 out of 5 kidney transplants from deceased donors. Minimizing modifiable risk factors, in particular immunologic risk, may ameliorate the incidence and outcome of DGF. The outcome of DGF depends mainly on the diagnosis of any rejection and worsens upon detection of transplant glomerulitis and pronounced interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IFTA).     

Body Mass Index and Kidney Donor Profile Index as Prognostic Markers of the Outcome of Renal Transplantation

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to determine the effects of Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) and body mass index (BMI) of the deceased donor on the kidney allograft outcome 1 year after transplantation.MethodsWe retrospectively studied 98 deceased kidney allograft donors with a mean age of 56 ± 12 years. The donors were divided into 5 groups according to their BMI: Normal ΒΜΙ = 25 (n = 25); ΒΜΙ 25 to 29 = Overweight (n = 33); ΒΜΙ 30 to 34.9 = Obese class I (n = 19); ΒΜΙ 35 to 39 = Obese class ΙΙ (n = 11); and ΒΜΙ >40 = Obese class III (n = 10). We examined the impact of the deceased donor's BMI and KDPI on delayed graft function (DGF) and estimated renal glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (measured by the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation) 1 year after transplantation.ResultsDonor BMI significantly increased the prevalence of DGF (P = .031), and it was associated with higher cold ischemia time (P = .021). However, there was no significant association between the aforementioned BMI groups and 1-year eGFR (P = 0.57), as deceased grafts from donors with increased BMI (BMI > 40) gained sufficient renal function during the first year of transplantation. Moreover, high KDPI was associated not only with DGF (P = .015), but also with decreased values of eGFR (P = .033).ConclusionIn this population, we identified no significant association between donor BMI and long-term clinical outcomes in deceased donor kidney transplants. KDPI, and not ΒΜΙ, of the deceased donor seems to be a good prognostic factor of renal function at the end of the first year after kidney transplant, whereas high BMI and high KDPI markedly induce DGF.     

Outcome of Nonheart-Beating Donor Kidneys with Prolonged Delayed Graft Function after Transplantation

Nonheart-beating donor (NHBD) kidneys are frequently associated with delayed graft function (DGF), with a deleterious effect on kidney function and allograft survival. The influence and the duration of DGF on the outcome of NHBD kidneys are assessed. All recipients of an NHBD kidney in the period 1993-2003 were reviewed. Excluded from analysis were patients with primary nonfunction (PNF). One hundred and five patients with a functioning NHBD graft were reviewed: 23 (22%) had immediate function (group 1), 40 (38%) had DGF < or = 2 weeks (group 2), 31 (30%) had DGF 15 days to 4 weeks (group 3) and 11 (10%) had DGF for > 4 weeks (group 4). Creatinine clearance at 3 months was higher in groups 1 and 2 versus group 4 (p = 0.015 and p = 0.006, respectively) and was higher in group 2 versus group 4, at 1 year (p = 0.01). Graft survival was 95%, 98%, 97% and 89%, respectively, at 1 year and 95%, 85%, 77% and 89%, respectively, at 5 years, which was not significantly different. The duration of DGF in NHB kidneys has a negative effect on creatinine clearance, but no effect on graft survival.     

Cardiac Remodeling in Structure and Function Six Months After Kidney Transplantation

Background

Cardiovascular disease accounts for 35% to 50% of the causes of mortality in chronic kidney disease. The majority of patients in substitution therapy in Mexico are subdialyzed owing to limited economic resources. This produces more cardiac deterioration than described in the statistics and has a direct impact on the prognosis of kidney transplantation. The aim of this work was to demonstrate and to quantify the improvement in the echocardiographic parameters 6 months after renal transplantation in patients with stable renal function.