Clinical Analysis of Living Related Renal Transplantation With Donors Older Than 50 Years in China

Objective

The objective of this study was to investigate whether kidney grafts from living related donors older than 50 years were safe for the donors and recipients in the long term.

Methods

One hundred seven living related donor kidney transplantations were performed in our center from April 1994 to December 2007. No prisoners or organs from prisoners were used in the collection of these data. Donors were divided into 2 groups: >50 years of age (range, 51-78 years), designated as the study group, and ≤50 years of age (range, 21-50 years), designated as the control groups. The mean time of follow-up was 49 months (range, 12-180 months). Clinical data were compared, including donor serum creatinine (Scr) levels, glomerular filtration rates (GFR) before and after the procedures operative complications, and postoperative short-term and long-term recovery of renal function in recipients as well as their complications and recipient and kidney survivals.

Results

All operations were successfully performed. Before the operation, the mean Scr and GFR were 82.16 ± 10.86 umol/L and 85.82 ± 6.26 mL/min, respectively, in the study group versus 78.66 ± 10.41 umol/L and 88.74 ± 9.44 mL/min, respectively, in the control group. There were no significant differences in mean Scr or GFR values between the groups at various preoperative or postoperative times (P > .05). No severe perioperative complications occurred, and no subsequent renal function failure was observed upon long-term follow-up of donors in the 2 groups. Comparisons of recipient age, gender ratio, duration on dialysis, HLA matches, cold/warm ischemia times, and immunosuppression therapy showed a correlations between the 2 groups. Mean Scr levels of recipients, which were compared from 1 week to 3 years following surgery, were slightly higher among the control than the study group, but the difference was not significant (P > .05). There were no significant differences between the study and control groups in 1-,3-,5-, and 8-year recipient/graft survival rates (P > .05).

Conclusions

Long-term follow-up showed that transplantations using grafts from donors older than 50 years of age yielded similar results to those with younger donors.     

Association between preoperative allograft function (effective renal plasma flow) and the change in glomerular filtration rate among living-donor kidney transplant recipients

Background

Predonation kidney function may be an important factor affecting graft outcome. Increased baseline allograft function may be more effective than strategies to slow the decline in glomerular filtration rate (GFR). However, the role of donor effective renal plasma flow (ERPF) on long-term outcome is less well understood. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between preoperative allograft function as measured by ERPF and the decline of allograft function as defined by the annualized change in GFR among living-donor kidney transplant recipients.

Methods

We performed a retrospective analysis of 83 patients who underwent living donor renal transplantation at our institution from March 2001 to October 2010. A time series analysis of autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) model was applied to determine the annualized change in GFR after transplantation. Univariate and stepwise multivariate analyses were performed using linear regression between preoperative ERPF and annualized change in GFR after transplantation. We also investigated the influence on annualized change in GFR of other donor or recipient variables.

Results

The ARIMA model revealed that the annualized change in GFR was −1.344 ± 12.476 mL/min/1.73 m² per year. Pearson correlation coefficient for the association between predonation ERPF of the transplanted kidney and the annualized change in GFR was 0.033 (P = .777).

Conclusions

Poor predonation kidney function was not associated with an increased rate of decline of allograft function. Neither donor age nor renal function (preoperative ERPF value) was a valid predictor of change in GFR among living-donor kidney transplant recipients.     

Imaging evaluation of kidney using multidetector computerized tomography in living-related renal transplantation

Background

Multidetector computerized tomography (MDCT) is lesser invasive than conventional angiography and has the advantage of assessment of vessels and surrounding anatomic variants before laparoscopic nephrectomy.

Methods

From May 2005 to March 2011, 62 consecutive living kidney donors of mean age 45.3 ± 12.7 years (range 24-70 y, male:female 26:36) underwent laparoscopic nephrectomy to paired recipients of mean age 44.8 ± 14.0 years (range 17-74 y, male:female 38:24). The clinical characteristics and laboratory data of donors and recipients were collected for analysis. Graft function as indicated by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was obtained from the last stable visit of the donors and the best value displayed by the recipients.

Results

There was no significant correlation between CT kidney volume and and eGFR. By univariate analysis, donor age was associated with worse graft function (−0.51 mL/min lower eGFR per 1 year of donor age; P < .0001). Female sex and higher effective renal plasma flow/body mass index ratio were associated with better graft function; conversely, body weight and BMI were associated with poor graft function upon univariate and multivariate analysis. An ERPF of <220 mL/min and a donor age >45 y showed significantly lower eGFR. There was no effect of CT kidney volume <100 mL.

Conclusions

Our preliminary data suggest that CT kidney volume does not predict posttransplantation graft function, but MDCT is still important for analysis of anatomy before laparoscopic nephrectomy among living donors.     

Kidney transplantation using expanded criteria donors in Korea

Background

Use of expanded criteria donor (ECD) grafts seeks to solve the organ shortage. We investigated the current status of donor selection and transplantation outcomes.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 791 kidney transplantations performed between 1997 and 2009. An expanded criteria deceased donor (ECDD) was defined as an individual who fulfilled the United Network for Organ Sharing criteria or, the Nyberg criteria. An expanded criteria living donor (ECLD) was determined by fulfillment of 1 or more of 5 criteria.

Results

Deceased and living donor kidney transplantations were performed in 228 (28.8%) and 563 (71.2%) cases, respectively. Forty-three cases (18.9%) belonged to the ECDDs. The ECDD group showed a lower posttransplantation 1-year estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) than that of the standard criteria deceased donor (SCDD) group (70.7 ± 19.2 vs 48.6 ± 11.5; P < .001). The ECDDs were allocated to older recipients or recipients with more HLA mismatches than SCDDs. The number of ECLD cases was 173 (30.7%). The proportions of each medical abnormality of living donors were as follows: age older than 60 years (0.5%), hypertension (2.5%), obesity (2.1%), low eGFR (25.9%), proteinuria (0%), and microscopic hematuria (1.4%). The ECLD group showed a lower posttransplantation 1-year eGFR than that of the standard criteria living donor (SCLD) group (66.9 ± 16.0 vs 58.3 ± 11.2; P < .001). Graft survival was not different among the donor types (P = .518).

Conclusions

eCDs were 27.3% of the total kidney donors. Posttransplantation 1-year eGFR was lower in the ECD group. However, there was no difference in the graft survival among the different donor types.     

Increasing levels of hemoglobin improve renal transplantation outcomes

Introduction

Several studies have reported various data on prevalence of posttransplant anemia (PTA). We have little information about its impact on long-term graft outcomes and few studies of the optimal hemoglobin (Hb) target in kidney transplantation.

Methods

We examined retrospectively 144 kidney transplant recipients of mean age 44.4 ± 12.3 years and follow-up of 40.5 ± 4.6 months. Exclusion criteria were age below 18 years, multiorgan transplantation, and graft failure in the first year. Using simple and multiple linear regression models, we evaluated the potential prediction of a serum concentration of Hb at 1 year after renal transplantation on allograft outcome as measured by Δ% estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), the difference between eGFR, measured with the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula, at the end of follow-up, and at 1 year. Multiple models were adjusted for recipient sex, recipient age, donor age, ESA therapy, acute rejection episodes (ARE), days of delayed graft function, human leukocyte antigen mismatches and cold ischemia time.

Results

At 1 year after transplantation, the mean Hb level was 13.77 ± 1.87 g/dL in males and 12.52 ± 1.53 g/dL in females. The average eGFR at 1 year was 63.07 ± 25.88 mL/min. At the end of follow-up, the mean Δ% eGFR was −5.73% ± 27.30%. Blood concentration of Hb correlated with donor, recipient sex, ARE, and eGFR at 1 year. There was a close correlation between the Δ% Hb and eGFR upon univariate analysis and the multiple linear regression model. Hb was the only predictor of transplant outcome.

Conclusions

Many factors are involved in kidney allograft function. Among these, Hb is important. In this work we demonstrated that increasing levels of Hb at 1 year after transplantation seemed to predict better preservation of graft function, representing a marker of a good quality graft.     

Results of a living donor kidney promotion program

Background

Living kidney donor transplantation, a treatment option for end-stage kidney failure, may achieve better results than cadaveric donor transplantation. Although its significant use in some countries is due to the scarcity of cadaveric donors, it is also useful because it reduces waiting time for young recipients and avoids dialysis when performed before starting renal replacement therapy. Due to the high rate of cadaveric donation in Spain, there has only been a limited increase in the number of living donor kidney transplantations.

Methods

In February 2004, we initiated a program to promote living kidney donation (LKD) through an information plan that was transmitted to the patients by dialysis nephrologists and chronic kidney failure outpatient clinics.

Results

From February 2004 to March 2010, we evaluated 109 donor and recipient pairs: parent to child (n = 48 cases; 44%), spouses (n = 32 cases; 29.3%), siblings (n = 27; 24.7%), and uncle and nephew (n = 2; 1.8%). The mean donor age (49 ± 9 years) was significantly higher than the 39 ± 13 years of the recipients (P < .01). In 45 cases (41.3%), the procedure led to of living kidney donor transplantation but in 58 (53.2%), a transplantation was not performed due to recipient problems (n = 53) or donor problems (n = 5). In 6 cases (5.5%), the evaluation is still pending. With the initiation of this project, it has been possible to significantly increase the rate of living kidney donor transplantation in our hospital from 0.8% (March to January 2004: 16/1964) to 4.2% (February 2004 to March 2010: 43/1022 transplants; P < .01).

Conclusion

A policy of active information together with adequate studies of the potential donor and recipient significantly increased the number of living kidney donor transplantations. The profitability of the study procedure was 50%. The most frequent cause of noncompletion of the procedure was recipient-related problems.     

Impact of Recipient Aging on Kidney Allograft in Living Donor Transplantation

Background

The aging of recipients is becoming increasingly important in organ transplantation.

Patients and Methods

We analyzed outcomes in 215 consecutive adult kidney transplant recipients from living donors who underwent transplantation at our center between November 1988 and March 2012. The list of recipients was divided by age at transplantation into those aged 16 to 29 years (n = 61), 30 to 39 years (n = 69), 40 to 49 years (n = 33), 50 to 59 years (n = 29), and those 60 years or older (elderly group, n = 23). Cox proportional hazards analysis was used to calculate the relative risk (RR) of patient death and graft failure, with recipient age included as a continuous variable.

Results

Univariate analysis showed that recipient age did not significantly affect the risk of graft failure, either uncensored (RR = 1.01, P = .312) or censored for death (RR = 0.993, P = .587). Multivariate analysis, however, showed that recipient age was an independent risk factor for patient death (RR = 1.053, P = .024). The patient survival rate was the poorest in elderly group (87.0%, P = .036), whereas the both death uncensored and censored graft survival rates of this group were 78.1% and 91.3%, respectively, comparable to those of other age groups (P = .567 and P = .696). Mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 1 year after transplantation was lower in elderly groups than in other groups (46.1 ± 13.0 mL/min/1.73 m², P = .014). However, mean δeGFR, defined as the difference between pretransplantation eGFR of the donor and eGFR of the recipient 1 year post-transplantation, did not differ significantly among age groups.

Conclusion

Recipient age did not affect allograft deterioration in living donor kidney transplantation, although it was an independent risk factor of recipient death.     

Early postoperative spectral Doppler parameters of renal transplants: the effect of donor and recipient factors

Background

The objective of this study was to explore the donor and recipient factors related to the spectral Doppler parameters of the transplant kidney in the early posttransplantation period.

Methods

This retrospective study included 76 patients who underwent renal transplantation assessed using Doppler ultrasonography (US) on the first postoperative day. We compared spectral Doppler parameters (peak systolic velocity [PSV] and resistive index [RI]) of the segmental artery of the transplant kidney according to the type of renal transplant, level of serum creatinine (SCr) of donor prior to organ donation, and donor/recipient age.

Results

RI was significantly higher in deceased-donor kidney transplantation (DDKT) as compared with living-donor kidney transplantation (LDKT; 0.73 ± 0.10 vs 0.66 ± 0.11; P = .007). In the DDKT recipients, multivariate analysis showed donor SCr was the only factor affecting PSV (P = .023), whereas recipient age was the only factor affecting RI (P = .035). In the LDKT recipients, multivariate analysis showed recipient age was the only factor affecting both PSV (P = .009) and RI (P = .018).

Conclusion

Spectral Doppler parameters in the early posttransplantation period are related to the type of renal transplant, donor renal function, and recipient age. These factors should be taken into consideration when interpreting the results of spectral Doppler US.     

Renal transplantation in old recipients from expanded criteria donors selected by kidney biopsy

Background

In Spain, the number of ideal kidney transplant donors has fallen, with at the same time an increase in the number of older recipients on the waiting list.

Aim

To analyze the results of expanded criteria cadaveric donor kidney transplants into older recipients using grafts selected by kidney biopsy.

Patients and methods

We studied 360 kidney transplant recipients who had been followed to December 2009: 180 in the study group and 180 in a control group composed of younger patients who received grafts from non-expanded criteria donors between 1999 and 2006. A paraffin-embedded kidney biopsy was evaluated by the percentages of sclerosed glomeruli, arteriolar hyalinosis, intimal wall thickening, interstitial fibrosis, and tubular atrophy.

Results

Significant differences were observed in donor age (63.50 ± 5.46 vs 31.90 ± 13.29 years; P < .001) and recipient age (58.40 ± 8.80 vs 40.71 ± 13.23 years; P < .001). Donor renal function was significantly worse among the expanded criteria group (90.80 vs 108.11 mL/min/1.73 m²; P = .006), remaining so over time in the recipient (at 1 year: 42.08 vs 63.71 [P < .001]; at 3 years: 41.25 vs 62.31 [P < .001], and at 7 years: 38.17 vs 64.18 [P < .001]). Censored 7-year graft survivals were 73% versus 87% (P < .001) with similar patient survivals (90.5% vs 95%; P = .39).

Conclusions

Selection of expanded criteria donors by kidney biopsy resulted in good renal function as well as graft and patient survivals at 7 years in older recipients.     

Long Graft Cold Ischemia Time Is Associated With Increased Arterial Stiffness in Renal Transplant Recipients

Background

Increased pulse wave velocity (PWV), an indicator of arterial stiffness, is associated with greater cardiovascular risk among renal transplant recipients. PWV depends on recipient-related factors and, as shown in recent studies, also on donor age. There is a lack of information whether graft-related factors influence arterial function in recipients. Graft cold ischemia time (CIT) significantly influences renal transplant outcomes. It was shown in an experimental model of aortic grafting that increased CIT promoted arteriosclerosis. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the relationship between renal graft CIT and PWV.

Methods

Carotid-femoral PWV were measured in 103 cadaveric kidney recipients of mean age 45 ± 12 years. We analyzed clinical data of recipient and donor ages, genders, body mass index, blood pressure, CIT, delayed graft function, and type of immunosuppressive therapy to compare patients with CIT < 24 (n = 24) versus CIT ≥ 24 hours (n = 79).

Results

PWV was lower among patients with shorter CIT (8.3 ± 1.6 vs 9.2 ± 2.0 respectively; P < .05). No significant differences were observed between the groups regarding donor and recipient ages, blood pressure, glomerular filtration rate, or immunosuppressive and cardiovascular therapy. A significant positive correlation was noted between PWV and CIT (r = .23; P = .019). Multiple regression analysis demonstrated that recipient age, therapy with cyclosporine, fasting glucose, systolic blood pressure, and CIT were independently associated with PWV.

Conclusions

Long CIT was associated with increased arterial stiffness. Further studies are necessary to understand the cause effect relationship of this finding.     

Donor-recipient age difference and graft survival in living donor kidney transplantation

Background

In paired living kidney exchange donation from an old donor to a young recipient, it may be argued that elderly donors provide an inferior quality kidney. However, the impact of donors older than recipients on transplant outcomes remains unclear.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the charts of primary living kidney transplantation patients who were divided into two groups based on the age difference between donor and recipient (recipient age subtracted from donor age, donor-recipient < 20 vs ≥ 20). The donor-recipient age difference < 20 group comprised 75 and donor-recipient age difference ≥ 20 group, 25 subjects. Outcome measures included serum creatinine, acute rejection episodes as well as graft and patient survivals at 1 and 5 years after transplantation.

Results

The mean donor age difference cohorts of < 20 and ≥ 20 years showed donor ages of 33 ± 8 and 54 ± 8 years, respectively. The mean recipient age in both groups averaged under 40 years. The acute rejection rate within the first year posttransplantation was greater among age difference ≥ 20 years. The mean serum creatinine values of the donor-recipient age difference < 20 group was lower than the ≥20 years group at 1 and 5 years posttransplant. The 1-year difference was associated with an increased creatinine value at 5 years. However, death-censored graft survival of the age difference of the ≥ 20 years group was not different (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.01-1.37, P = .08). Patient survival of the age difference ≥ 20 years group showed no difference compared with the age difference < 20 years group (HR = 0.25, 95% CI = 0.01-6.35, P = .4).

Conclusion

Although the cohort of a donor-young recipient age difference ≥ 20 years showed a greater risk of an acute rejection episode early posttransplantation, it did not affect graft or patient survivals. When considering paired kidney donation, older age donors should not necessarily be limited.     

Results with expanded donor acceptance criteria in heart transplantation

Objective

Over the past years both donor and recipient profiles have changed in heart transplantation. Satisfactory clinical outcomes of marginal donors in candidates >60 years of age have led us to allocate suboptimal donors to younger recipients as well. Therefore, we retrospectively reviewed our experience.

Methods

Among 199 patients undergoing heart transplantation from January 2000 to February 2010, there were 83 (41%) aged 61-72 years. The other 116 (59%) ranged in age between 18 and 60 years. According to their clinical conditions as heart transplantation candidates, They were classified into 4 groups: younger recipients (n = 116) of either optimal donors (n = 72; group 1 [G1]) or marginal donors (n = 44; group 2 [G2]) and older recipients (n = 83) of either marginal grafts (n = 70, group 3 [G3]) or optimal grafts (n = 13; group 4 [G4]). The gender distribution, cause of end-stage heart failure, preoperative pulmonary hypertension incidence, pretransplantation clinical status, and mean follow-up were not significantly different among the 4 groups.

Results

Overall 30-day survival was 90 ± 1% and 10-year rate was 78 ± 9%. Among the groups, 30-day and 10-year actuarial survival rates were, respectively: 94 ± 4% and 87 ± 1% for G1; 86 ± 5% and 84 ± 7% for G2; 88 ± 4% and 71 ± 7% for G3 and were 100% and 82 ± 7% for G4 (P = .7). In comparison among the 4 groups, there was no significant difference regarding freedom from graft failure (P = .3), right ventricular failure (P = .3), acute rejection episodes (P = .2), chronic rejection (P = .2), neoplasia (P = .5), or chronic renal failure (P = .1). Older recipients of marginal donors [G3] had a 4% (n = 3) prevalence of permanent pacemaker implant, versus G2: 3% (n = 2) among (P = .1).

Conclusion

Our results suggest that extended donor and recipient criteria do not compromise clinical outcomes after transplantation.     

Risks of Living Donor Nephrectomy

Introduction

There is good evidence that long-term graft survival is superior when living donors are used for kidney transplantation. Nevertheless, an assessment of potential risks associated with living donation is of particular interest.

Patients and Methods

In this single-center study, we evaluated the renal function of 31 kidney living donors (1997-2003) at 2-13.2 years after nephrectomy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate perioperative complications, renal function, new-onset proteinuria, and hypertension.

Results

Living related donation was performed in all cases. The average time after donation was 5.7 ± 2.4 years. The mean age at nephrectomy was 46.3 ± 9.0 years (range, 25-64), and 26 (83.9%) donors were females. Twelve patients (29%) were older than 50 years. The left kidney was used in 25 patients (80.6%). Surgical complications occurred in 2 patients. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) decreased from 116.9 ± 23 to 77.7 ± 19.2 mL/min/1.73 m² (P < .001). Five patients (16.1%) developed a postdonation GFR between 50 and 60 mL/min/1.73 m². Patients with lower GFR values after uninephrectomy showed lower predonation values (P < .05). Older patients (>50 years) displayed lower postdonation GFR than younger ones. We did not observe an increased prevalence of low postdonation GFR over time nor significant differences in protein excretion and blood pressure.

Conclusions

Living donor nephrectomy appears to be an acceptably safe intervention. Despite a reduction in GFR, the postdonation incidence of hypertension was low and proteinuria was not observed in any donor, even among previously hypertensive patients. Rigorous donor follow-up is recommended to identify persons at risk.     

Importance of Renal Mass on Graft Function Outcome After 12 Months of Cadaveric Donor Kidney Transplantation

Background

Few studies have measured cadaveric kidney weight to investigate its relation to recipient kidney function related to it. The aim of this study was to evaluate kidney weight (cadaveric donor) and its relationship to creatinine clearance (CrCl) after 12 months posttransplantation.

Methods

We evaluated 81 renal transplantation recipients from cadaveric donors. We collected donor and recipient demographic, clinical and anthropometric data. Data about kidney weight were obtained through kidney measurement using an electronic machine at the moment of transplantation.

Results

The mean kidney weight was 201.4 ± 10.2 g (200.5 ± 11.6 g in women and 210.3 ± 14.1 g in men). Kidney weight correlated with CrCl at 12 months (0.001). The CrCl at 12 months showed a significant correlation of graft weight/recipient weight ratio (P < .01).

Conclusion

The cadaveric donor kidney weight significantly influenced the CrCl at 12 months after transplantation.     

The risk factors to predict acute rejection in liver transplantation

Purpose

The aim of this study was to evaluate risk factors for an acute cellular rejection episode (ARE) among adult liver transplant (OLT) patients.

Materials and methods

We retrospectively reviewed 110 consecutive patients who underwent OLT between May 2007 and December 2010. The diagnosis of ARE was based upon clinical and biochemical data; liver biopsy was only performed when clinical presentation was equivocal. We recorded donor and recipient characteristics, perioperative immune status, and postoperative laboratory data. Forty patients (36.4%) who suffered a clinical rejection episode and received pulsed or recycled steroid therapy (R group), were compared with 70 (63.6%) free of rejection (N group).

Results

The mean age of R recipients was 46.61 ± 9.97 years, which was younger than the N group (51.86 ± 8.37, P = .005). R group patients displayed a lower pre-OLT creatinine (P = .016) and higher alanine aminotransferase (P = .048). Cox regression model showed recipient age to be the only significant factor to predict ARE (odds ratio = 1.071, P = .003). The cutpoint of age was 46 years by receiver operating characteristic analysis. Patients younger than 46 years showed higher initial CD8⁺ T-cell counts (P = .038).

Conclusion

Recipient age was significantly associated with ARE; younger patients showed higher CD8⁺ lymphocyte counts than older patients. More aggressive immunosuppression should be considered for younger recipients to prevent ARE.     

Risk factors for kidney impairment and differential impact of liver transplantation on renal function

Background

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a common problem in long-term survivors after liver transplantation (LT). It is important to identify and correct risk factors that negatively affect kidney function. The purpose of this study was to delineate the risk factors associated with progressive kidney dysfunction after OLT.

Methods

We analyzed 50 recipients (10 female, 40 male) of overall age of 44 ± 13 year who were all ≥18 years old and underwent first LT between 1999 and 2005. Patient-related risk factors were evaluated for renal failure at 3 and 5 years after transplantation. We evaluated parameters of demographic data, laboratory values, daily proteinuria, and renal resistive index (RRI) by Doppler ultrasonography. CKD was defined as a sustained decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Patients were divided into 3 groups according to the change in eGFR from the baseline value: group 1, stable eGFR (no change from baseline); group 2, <50% decreased eGFR; and group 3, ≥50% decrease from baseline. eGFR was calculated by using Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula.

Results

At 3 years after LT, GFR negatively correlated with initial Child-Pugh score (r = −0.42; P < .01); microalbuminuria (r = −0.28; P < .01), and RRI (r = −0.36; P < .01). After 5 years, GFR negatively correlated with initial gamma glutamyl transferase (r = −0.21; P < .05), PT (r = −0.29; P < .05), and RRI (r = −0.32; P < .01). Pretransplantation direct bilirubin levels were significantly correlated with GFR decrease at 3 years (P = .05). At 5 years of follow-up, smoking (P < .05), baseline alanine aminotransferase (P = .03) and serum triglyceride (P < .01) levels significantly correlated with eGFR decrease. Pretransplantation serum creatinine levels were stratified into normal versus high groups. Patients with increased basal serum creatinine levels displayed shorter survivals than those with normal creatinine levels, namely, median values of 21 ± 3.9 months versus 14 ± 2.4 months, log rank test: P < .05).

Conclusion

Renal function after liver transplantation show sustained impairment in certain patients. In the short term the main risk factors for renal detoriation were severity of liver disease before LT, microalbuminuria, and renal perfusion. In the long term, smoking and dyslipidemia were the main predictors of CKD. Patients with high basal serum creatinine values were at increased risk of mortality.     

Influence of Donor-Recipient Gender Mismatch in Early Outcome After Lung Transplantation

Objective

Donor and recipient genders are not considered in lung transplantation (LT) programs. However, recent data have suggested a possible biologic effect of gender combination on the outcome of LT. We ought to evaluate the effect of gender combinations on early survival in a single-institution experience in transplant recipients.

Methods

We analyzed the potential effect of donor-recipient gender combinations (male [M] or female [F]) on early survival of all patients whose LTs were performed between January 1999 and December 2006. Patients were distributed into 4 groups: M donor to M recipient (M-M group); M donor to F recipient (M-F group); F donor to F recipient (F-F group); and F donor to M recipient (F-M group). The comparison between groups was performed using two-tailed Fisher exact test and analysis of variance (ANOVA).

Results

During the study period, 152 LTs were performed in 149 patients, including 99 male donors and 53 female donors. The mean age of the recipients was 54 ± 10 years (range, 14-70). The 30-day survival rate was 86% (95% confidence interval [CI], 77%- 92%) for the M-M group, 67% (95% CI, 41%-87%) for the F-M group, 89% (95% CI, 52%-100%) for the M-F group, and 83% (95% CI, 66%-93%) for the F-F group. No differences were observed between group survivals according to the Fisher test (P = .27).

Conclusions

We found no association between donor-recipient gender mismatch and improved survival in lung transplant recipients. Further investigation is needed to finally understand the possible role of gender combinations in LT.     

Quality of Life and Problems Affecting Recipients More Than 10 Years After Living Donor Liver Transplantation

Background

We initiated living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in 1991, allowing us to examine issues related to long-term survival. The aim of this study was to review the long-term outcomes of LDLT in children.

Patients and Methods

We performed 116 LDLT from 1991 to present, including 17 recipients who survived >10 years. They were evaluated for growth, immunosuppressive therapy, complications, and quality of life (QOL).

Results

The average age at LDLT was 5.4 years (range, 6 months to 17 years), with a present average age of 17.2 years (range, 11-28 years). At the time of LDLT, 6 recipients had growth retardation with body weights low for age by 2 standard deviations (SD). However, 4 of 6 recipients who underwent LDLT before age of 2 years caught up, reaching average heights and body weights for their ages. Among 6 recipients who were diagnosed with acute rejections by biopsy >5 years after LDLT, 5 improved after steroid pulse therapy. One recipient with a steroid-resistant acute rejection was administered deoxyspergualin after steroids. Chronic rejection was not observed in this series. One recipient has not required immunosuppressive therapy for >4 years with a good present condition.

Conclusion

The majority of LDLT recipients achieved a good QOL during long-term survival; they are pursuing normal studies.     

Donor-dependent risk factors for early surgical complications after simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation

Introduction

The success of simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPK) depends in a large degree on avoidance of surgical complications in the early postoperative period. The aim of the study was to analyze the Pre-procurement Pancreas Allocation Suitability Score (P-PASS) and the deceased donor parameters included within it as risk factors for early surgical complications after SPK.

Material and Methods

Forty-six consecutive donors whose kidney and pancreas were simultaneously transplanted were included in the study.

Results

Donor age was older among recipients who lost their pancreatic grafts: 30.4 ± 6.9 versus 24.1 ± 6.9 years. Donor age was also older among recipients who lost their pancreatic grafts or died compared with those discharged with a functioning graft: 29.3 ± 5.7 versus 24.0 ± 6.9 years. Donor body mass index (BMI) was higher among patients who died compared with those who were discharged: 25.3 ± 1.1 versus 23.2 ± 2.5 kg/m². P-PASS was higher in patients who lost their pancreatic grafts (17.6 ± 2.1 vs 15.2 ± 1.8) or died (15.3 ± 1.9 vs 17.2 ± 1.9), or lost pancreatic graft or died (15.2 ± 1.8 vs 17.0 ± 2.2) or with intra-abdominal infections (IAI; 17.1 ± 1.7 vs 15.0 ± 1.8). The incidence of donors ≥30 years old was higher among recipients with IAI (45.4% vs 14.3%; P = .04). An higher rate of donors with P-PASS >16 was revealed among patients who lost their pancreatic grafts (26.7% vs 3.2%), died (26.7% vs 3.2%), lost the pancreatic graft or died (33.3% vs 6.4%), or experienced IAI (46.7% vs 9.7%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed P-PASS (odds ratio 2.57; P = .014) and serum sodium (odds ration, 0.91; P = .048) to be important predictors of IAI development.

Conclusion

Older age and higher BMI among deceased donors increased the risk of IAI, pancreatic graft loss, or recipient death after SPK. Transplantation of a pancreas from a donor with a low P-PASS score was associated with a lower risk of surgical complications after SPK.     

Evolution of glomerular filtration rate, renal injury markers, anemia, and angiotensin blockers use after change from calcineurin inhibitors to sirolimus in transplant patients with neoplasia versus chronic allograft nephropathy

Background

The change from calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) to sirolimus (SRL) is a safe alternative in transplant patients with neoplasia (NEO) whereas the results of conversion for chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) are controversial, depending on the histologic score, degree of proteinuria, and glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Our aim in this study was to compare GFR, proteinuria, albuminuria, blood pressure (BP) effects, and anemia after switching to sirolimus (SRL) among renal transplant recipients with CAN versus NEO.

Methods

Fifty-five kidney transplant recipients with conversion from CNI to SRL owing to CAN or NEO were analyzed for the variables at 6 months before, at the time of, and at 6 months and 1, 2, and 3 years after the switch to SRL.

Results

There were no differences between CAN and NEO in the slope of estimated GFR (mL/min/1.73 m² by Cockcroft-Gault formula) at 1 year (−5.5 vs 3.7; P = .007) and at 2 years (−3.86 vs −10.3; P = .01). The values of proteinuria (mg/24 h/1.73 m²) before (665 ± 136 vs 329 ± 69; P = .036) as well as at 1 (1,122 ± 306 vs 863 ± 190; P = .478) and at 2 years after conversion (1,360 ± 430 vs 457 ± 154; P = .045) showed some significant differences, as did the use of both antiangiotensin agents, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and angiotensin receptor blocker at the moment of switch (35% vs 0%; P = .005) at 1 year (69% vs. 6% P = .02) and at 2 years (67% vs 28%; P = .047). There were no differences in graft survival (log rank: P = .515). By logistic regression analysis, the best covariate associated with GFR >45 mL/min at 2 years was GFR >60 mL/min at the moment of switch to SRL (odds ratio, 1.33; 95% confidence interval, 1.002-1.74).

Conclusions

The evolution of renal damage was more important in the CAN group requiring greater use of 2 angiotensin antagonists for control of proteinuria. We probably need histologic and serologic biomarkers to show which patients with CAN will show a bad evolution after the change to SRL.