Preemptive Therapy in Adult Liver Transplant Recipients in CMV-Endemic Area

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is not only a common complication after liver transplantation but also a significant contributing factor to morbidity and mortality. We investigated whether preemptive therapy can prevent CMV syndrome or tissue-invasive CMV disease in an endemic area. Preemptive therapy was initiated when more than 10 positive CMV pp65 antigen-positive cells per 400,000 white blood cells were detected, regardless of clinical manifestations. Intravenous ganciclovir as preemptive therapy was administered daily for 10 to 14 days until negative results were achieved. The incidence of initial CMV antigenemia and CMV syndrome during the posttransplantation period was 49.7% (353/710) and 5.2% (37/710), respectively. One hundred eight-two patients (51.6%) received ganciclovir as preemptive therapy. Patients with CMV antigenemia who received preemptive therapy had high Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score, repeat operation, renal dysfunction, infection, low hemoglobin concentration, low platelet count, low albumin concentration, high international normalized ratio, high total bilirubin value, high aspartate transaminase concentration, and high CMV peak titer. Cytomegalovirus syndrome and tissue-invasive CMV disease were more common in these patients. The survival curve in patients without CMV syndrome was better than that in those with CMV syndrome (P = .000). Patients with more than 10 pp65 antigen-positive cells per 400,000 white blood cells should be treated aggressively with an antiviral agent as preemptive therapy because CMV infection is common in CMV-endemic areas and patients with CMV syndrome demonstrate poor survival rates.     

Risk Factors for Posttransplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder in Pediatric Liver Transplant Recipients With Cytomegalovirus Antigenemia

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infections, associated with posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) are known to develop in cytomegalovirus (CMV)-infected transplant recipients due to the indirect effects of CMV. This study evaluated risk factors for PTLD among pediatric liver transplant recipients with CMV infections. We reviewed the medical records of 119 patients ≤18 years old who underwent liver transplantation between September 1996 and April 2009. Sixty-six subjects (55.5%) displayed CMV antigenemia during the study period; 15 (12.6%) developed PTLD. Of these, 10 developed PTLD after CMV antigenemia. The other patients (n = 5) were excluded due to negative CMV antigenemia. The incidence of PTLD influenced by CMV infection was not significantly different from the incidence of PTLD without underlying CMV (P = .258). There were no differences in age, gender, antiviral prophylaxis, type of liver transplantation, or acute rejection episodes in the incidence of between patients with versus without PTLD. EBV but not CMV high-risk groups were a predictor for the development of PTLD (P = .035). CMV syndrome, tissue-invasive CMV disease, and CMV peak titer were not associated with an increased risk of PTLD. The primary risk factor for PTLD was EBV high-risk patients (donor positive/recipient negative). CMV disease was not associated with PTLD in pediatric liver transplant recipients with CMV infections.     

Cytomegalovirus prophylaxis using oral ganciclovir or valganciclovir in kidney and pancreas-kidney transplantation under antibody preconditioning

We investigated retrospectively the risk factors for cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection under ganciclovir or valganciclovir prophylaxis (oral ganciclovir 1 g tid, valganciclovir 450 mg/d) in our kidney and simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplant patients undergoing transplantation between July 1, 2001 and February 28, 2003. Two hundred eleven patients receiving prophylactic oral ganciclovir or valganciclovir were included in the study. All patients were given antibody preconditioning (thymoglobulin 178, alemtuzumab 33). Duration of prophylactic treatment was between 3 and 8 months. Fifteen (7.1%) patients developed a positive CMV antigenemia in the first 6 months after transplantation, and 18 of 176 (10.2%) patients developed a positive CMV antigenemia during the first year. No patient developed tissue invasive CMV disease. At 6 months after transplantation, valganciclovir was slightly more effective than ganciclovir prophylaxis (P=.052). Positive donor CMV serology significantly increased the risk of CMV infection compared to CMV-negative donors (P=.014 and P=.003 at 6 and 12 months, respectively). Duration of CMV prophylaxis for more than 3 months decreased the risk of CMV infection (P=.04 and P=.009 at 6 and 12 months, respectively). Either valganciclovir prophylaxis (450 mg/d) or high-dose oral ganciclovir (1 g tid) is effective in preventing tissue-invasive CMV disease, and results in a low incidence of CMV antigenemia in patients undergoing kidney and SPK transplantation.     

Risk factors associated with cytomegalovirus-positive antigenemia in orthotopic liver transplant patients

The aim of the study was to investigate risk factors associated with cytomegalovirus (CMV)-positive antigenemia in orthotopic liver transplant (OLT) patients. Sixty-nine patients undergoing OLT during 2001 were retrospectively evaluated for CMV antigenemia during a follow-up of 6 months after transplantation for demographic variables, pretransplant donor and recipient CMV serologic status, etiology of liver disease, number of blood transfusions, and type of immunosuppression. Among the 69 patients who underwent 71 OLT in this period, 43 met study criteria. Mean age was 49.7 +/- 10.8 years and 60.5% were men. End-stage liver disease was the indication for liver transplant, except in one case. The most prevalent etiology of liver disease was hepatitis C and/or alcohol in 66% of the cases. CMV-positive status was recorded in 74% of donors and 95% of recipients. None of the CMV-negative recipients received a positive donor allograft. CMV-positive antigenemia was 84% with 12% having two episodes of infection. There was no correlation between CMV infection and age, gender, etiology of liver disease, or number of blood transfusions. However, all patients using cyclosporine had CMV-positive antigenemia compared with 61% using tacrolimus (P <.032). In this study, the incidence of CMV infection after OLT in adult patients was slightly higher than reported in literature. No risk factor was associated with CMV antigenemia; however, this study suggests a higher probability of CMV infection among patients treated with cyclosporine.     

Cytomegalovirus infection and graft rejection in renal transplantation

BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and CMV disease have been associated with acute and chronic graft rejection. The introduction of the sensitive CMV antigenemia pp65 assay for detection of CMV infection allowed us to study the time course of CMV infection and acute rejection and the long-term outcome in renal transplant recipients with and without a CMV risk constellation. METHODS: Prospective single center study including 48 renal transplant recipients at risk for CMV infection (donor and/or recipient CMV seropositive) and a control group of 36 CMV seronegative recipients of CMV seronegative kidney donors. Evidence of CMV infection was monitored by the CMV antigenemia pp65 assay every 1 to 2 weeks and compared with the occurrence of acute rejection in the posttransplant period and graft function at 5 years. RESULTS: CMV infection developed in 83% (40/48) of patients of the CMV risk group within 4 months posttransplant. A total of 18 of patients experienced an acute rejection episode (control group 16/36; P=0.65). In 12/18 CMV infection followed rejection and in three patients antigenemia preceded the diagnosis of rejection. In three patients CMV antigenemia remained negative. Five-year follow up: Patient survival (44/48 vs. 31/36; P=0.48), graft survival (38/48 vs. 27/36; P=0.79), number of patients with at least one acute rejection episode: CMV risk group: 42.1%, control group 51% (P=0.46), serum creatinine: CMV risk group:130 +/- 66 micromol/iter, control group: 126 +/- 37 micromol/ liter (P=0.56), proteinuria: CMV risk group: 0.02 +/- 0.02 g/mmol creatinine, control group: 0.02 +/- 0.02 g/mmol creatinine (P=1.0). CONCLUSION: CMV infection within 4 months posttransplant, as defined by a positive antigenemia assay was not found to be a risk factor for acute graft rejection or chronic graft dysfunction at 5 years.     

肝移植术后巨细胞病毒再感染的预防与治疗

目的　探讨肝移植术后巨细胞病毒(CMV)再感染的预防、诊断及治疗。方法　回顾性分析44例原位肝移植患者的临床资料。结果　44 例中,术前43 例(97.7 %)有CMV潜伏性感染,其中6例(14.0 %)术后发生CMV再感染。6例CMV再感染患者的CMV pp65抗原均为阳性,3例CMV IgM阳性,均为无临床症状的CMV活动性感染,其中5例治愈,无一例发展为CMV病,1 例因上消化道大出血死亡。43例中,仅有7例CMV再感染高危病例接受了抗CMV感染的预防性治疗,患者在生存期内未发生CMV再感染。结论　在我国,肝移植患者术前CMV潜伏性感染的发生率较高,测定CMV pp65抗原可以早期诊断CMV再感染;对CMV再感染的高危患者进行预防性治疗可以降低术后CMV再感染的发生率;对无临床症状的CMV再感染者进行及时、规范的治疗是防止CMV病发生的关键。     

Cytomegalovirus antigenemia as a useful marker of symptomatic cytomegalovirus infection after renal transplantation--a report of 130 consecutive patients

In earlier work we demonstrated that CMV immediate early antigens can be detected in peripheral blood leukocytes of patients with active CMV infection. We now report a comparison of the antigenemia assay and an anti-CMV ELISA in a prospective longitudinal study of 130 renal transplant recipients who were monitored for active CMV infection during the first 3 months after transplantation. Active CMV infection developed in 56 patients. The antigenemia assay had a sensitivity of 89% and a specificity of 93% in the diagnosis of active CMV infection; for the ELISA these figures were 95 and 100%, respectively. In 22 of the 56 patients a CMV syndrome occurred. Antigenemia was demonstrated in all 22 patients while an antibody response occurred in 21 of them. The antigenemia assay became positive 8 +/- 7 days before the onset of symptoms while the antibody response was observed 4 +/- 9 days after the onset of symptoms. The pattern of antigenemia was helpful for monitoring the course of the infection. The maximum level of antigenemia was significantly higher and its duration significantly longer in symptomatic than asymptomatic infection. We conclude that CMV antigenemia is a sensitive, specific, and early marker of CMV infection. The antigenemia assay is of great value in monitoring patients with a high risk of CMV infection.     

Cytomegalovirus prophylaxis with valganciclovir in African-American renal allograft recipients based on donor/recipient serostatus

There is a paucity of data examining the efficacy of valganciclovir (VGC) for cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis in kidney transplant patients, particularly with regard to utilization of a risk-stratified dosing regimen. Eighty adult African-American (AA) renal allograft recipients transplanted from November 3, 2001 to May 28, 2003 and followed for 22 +/- 8 months received VGC once daily for 90 d post-transplant dosed according to donor/recipient (D/R) serostatus: high risk (D+/R-) received 900 mg (n = 12); moderate risk (D+/R+, D-/R+) received 450 mg (n = 60); and low risk (D-/R-) received no prophylaxis (n = 8). Thymoglobulin or basiliximab was used for induction, and mycophenolate mofetil, prednisone, and either tacrolimus or sirolimus for maintenance immunosuppression. Only six patients (7.5%) developed symptomatic CMV infection diagnosed by pp65 antigenemia, three in the high-risk (25%) and three in the moderate-risk (5%) group (p = 0.02). All patients were on tacrolimus for at least 3 months prior to diagnosis. There were no cases of tissue-invasive disease, resistance to treatment, or recurrence. D+/R- serostatus was the only significant independent predictor for CMV infection using multivariate analysis (odds ratio 10.5; p = 0.04). Thymoglobulin induction was not associated with CMV infection. None of 43 patients who were exposed to sirolimus for >30 d developed CMV infection, vs. six of 37 who were not (p = 0.006). We conclude that VGC dosed according to D/R serostatus provides safe and effective CMV prophylaxis in AA renal allograft recipients.     

The Effect of Cytomegalovirus Antigenemia Titer on the Efficacy of Preemptive Therapy for the Prevention of Cytomegalovirus Disease After Kidney Transplantation

There is some controversy regarding the exact cytomegalovirus (CMV) antigenemia titer that should be used as a guideline for preemptive anti-CMV therapy. We performed 634 consecutive kidney transplantations between January 2000 and June 2007. Preemptive therapy employed intravenous gancyclovir treatment when the CMV antigenemia titer was ≥50/4 × 10⁵ leukocytes after kidney transplantation. The 634 recipients were allocated into 2 groups according to the peak CMV antegenemia: group A, CMV antigenemia titer <50/4 × 10⁵ (n = 550); and group B, ≥50/40 × 10⁵ (n = 84).Among the 634 recipients, 264 were positive for CMV antigenemia, and 61 developed symptomatic CMV infections. The incidence of symptomatic CMV infections in group B was significantly higher than in group A. Two cases in both groups developed tissue-proven CMV disease: group A CMV colitis and CMV nephritis, and group B, 2 cases of CMV colitis. Graft and patient survival rates in groups A and B at 5 years posttransplantation were not different.The authors concluded that a CMV antigenemia titer of ≥50/4 × 10⁵ leukocytes can be considered an appropriate guideline for preemptive anti-CMV therapy.     

Cytomegalovirus infection does not increase the risk of vanishing bile duct syndrome after liver transplantation

Abstract  Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and HLA-DR sharing have been reported to be associated with the development of vanishing bile duct syndrome (VBDS) after liver transplantation. We retrospectively analyzed the importance of these risk factors for VBDS in 126 consecutive recipients of a first transplant. In contrast to previous studies, CMV was monitored strictly using the antigenemia assay, a quantitative marker of the viral load. Patient and graft survival were comparable in patients with and without CMV infection. The incidence of VBDS was low, regardless of the CMV infection status or degree of HLA-DR sharing. Improvements in the early diagnosis and treatment of CMV infection may have eliminated its negative influence on graft survival.     

Cytomegalovirus infection in the first year after pediatric kidney transplantation

Cytomegalovirus is common in adult recipients (prevalence of 40–90%). Children are typically seronegative but immunosuppression may prone to primary-infection or viral reactivation, with potentially severe consequences. CMV infection incidence in pediatric kidney transplant recipients has seldom been investigated. The aim of our study was to evaluate the incidence and timing of CMV infection during the first year after renal transplantation. We assembled a retrospective cohort of 136 children who had received a kidney transplant between 2003 and 2014 with a year follow-up. The patients were classified regarding CMV infection as high risk (D+/R?), intermediate risk (R+) or low risk (D?/R?). CMV infection was defined by the viral replication remaining asymptomatic whereas CMV disease concerned viral replication with clinical and/or biological symptoms. Oral valganciclovir was used as prophylaxis for high-risk recipients. A total of 38 patients (27.9%) developed CMV infection, 13 (40.6%) of the 32 D+/R?, 24 (45.3%) of the 53 R+ and 1 (2.0%) of the 51 D?/R?. Of these 38 infected patients, 10 developed tissue-invasive disease. During the first year after kidney transplantation, 27.9% of recipients developed CMV infection. This study confirms the influence of donor and recipient CMV status on infection propensity and highlights the importance of adequate follow-up for intermediate risk patients.     

Cytomegalovirus infection and development of biliary complications after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is known to cause ulceration and mucosal hemorrhage in the gastrointestinal tract. Gastroduodenal and biliary complications were prospectively evaluated in 100 consecutive liver transplant patients in whom CMV was monitored during the first posttransplant year. METHOD: Gastroduodenal biopsy specimens were taken from 36 patients by endoscopies and in 28 patients by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, and bile duct specimens were taken from three patients who underwent surgical reconstruction because of biliary complication. CMV was demonstrated from blood by the pp65 antigenemia test and from frozen sections of tissue specimens by immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization. RESULTS: Symptomatic CMV infection, treated with ganciclovir, developed in 49 recipients: 13 (100%) of CMV seropositive donor (D+) seronegative recipient (R-) cases, 29 (45%) D+/R+ cases, and 7 (32%) D-/R+ cases. Duodenal ulcer developed in three and hemorrhagic gastritis in three recipients. CMV antigens were found from the gastroduodenal mucosa in 37 (69%) of the 54 studied recipients. The biliary complication rate was 24%. Preceding or concomitant CMV antigenemia was demonstrated in 75% of patients with a biliary complication (68% in CMV D+/R+ or D-/R+ and 100% in D+/R- recipients). The biliary complication rate was higher among recipients with CMV antigenemia, compared with recipients without (P<0.05). CMV antigenemia, CMV infection, or both in the duodenal mucosa was found in 96% of patients with a biliary complication. In two patients who underwent surgical reconstruction, CMV antigens and DNA were demonstrated in the bile ducts. CONCLUSIONS: Liver transplant patients are at risk of developing biliary complications after CMV infection, especially those with primary CMV infection.     

Prevention of Cytomegalovirus Disease in Renal Transplantation: Single-Center Experience

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and CMV disease remain important issues in renal transplantation. Incidence depends on individual patient risk. There are different possible strategies for CMV prophylaxis. In our center CMV prevention includes prophylaxis with low-dose valganciclovir for all high-risk recipients; for the remaining patients, valganciclovir is only prescribed when there is evidence of CMV replication. All recipients are monitored for viral replication. We evaluated the results of this preventive strategy in all 135 patients who underwent transplantation between 2006 and 2007 in our center. Average follow-up time was 16 months (6-30 months). Fifty-one recipients (38%) received CMV prophylaxis. The median duration of prophylaxis was 84 days. In 37% of the recipients (50 patients) CMV antigenemia became positive, and were given therapeutic doses of valganciclovir. Of these patients, 32% were high-risk recipients undergoing prophylaxis. CMV infection rate was 40% in the group not receiving prophylaxis. No association was observed between CMV infection and prophylaxis duration. However, 50% of patients who suspended prophylaxis before completion of the first 3 months became infected. There were 3 cases of CMV disease (2.2%). Leukopenia was seen in 34% of patients receiving prophylaxis. Valganciclovir prophylaxis for high-risk patients seems to be effective and safe among subjects who complete the full duration of treatment. Despite CMV-positive antigenemia in 40% of patients not undergoing prophylaxis, pre-emptive therapy with valganciclovir was effective to prevent CMV disease, but close monitoring is essential for disease prevention.     

Cytomegalovirus infection in renal transplant recipients is associated with impaired survival irrespective of expected mortality risk

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and CMV disease are associated with increased mortality post-transplantation. We have thus retrospectively examined whether this association is found both in patients with high and low mortality risk. Between 1994 and 1997, 471 kidney transplant recipients were monitored once weekly for CMV pp65 antigenemia and CMV disease the first 100 d after tx and followed prospectively for median 66.6 months. Patients with nephrosclerosis, diabetic nephropathy and amyloidosis were selected as high mortality risk groups (HRG). Overall and cardiovascular mortality beyond 100 d in the low-risk group (n = 372) was 14% and 3.5%, and in the HRG (n = 99) 31% and 16%, respectively. The effects of CMV infection and disease, recipient age and gender, panel-reactive cytotoxic antibodies, acute rejection, HRG, and graft loss in the whole study period were tested on overall mortality beyond 100 d in multiple analysis. HRG was independently associated with overall mortality, RR = 2.03, and still both CMV infection and disease were significant risk factors for mortality, independent of HRG. The same analysis was repeated for HRG (n = 99). Even in this small group CMV disease was independently associated with overall mortality. These data indicate that CMV increase mortality independently both in patients with otherwise high- or low-risk for long-term mortality.     

Cytomegalovirus Infection Renal Transplant Recipients: Risk Factors and Outcome

Objective

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is the most common viral infection after allotransplantation; it can be a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Our aim was to analyze the main risk factors that lead to development of CMV infection and disease.

Patients and Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 207 patients who received a renal allograft from May 2003 to December 2007. Three patients (D−/R−) were excluded. CMV infection was defined by the detection of 2 or more positive tests for pp65 antigenemia and CMV disease by evidence of attributable symptoms in need of antiviral treatment.

Results

Thirty-two patients (15.7%) presented active CMV infections and another 35 (17.2%), CMV disease. The mean follow-up was 27.8 ± 17 months. Prior to transplantation, 9.2% of patients were seronegative (D+/R−) and 77.9% seropositive (D+/R+). Compared with noninfected patients, those with CMV infection/disease were older and received an allograft from an older donor. Upon logistic regression analysis, recipient age older than 55 years, induction therapy with Thymoglobulin, and maintenance immunosuppression with cyclosporine were the major risk factors to develop CMV disease. An early acute rejection episode was more frequent and renal function measured by serum creatinine poorer until 18 months posttransplantation among CMV-infected versus noninfected patients.

Conclusions

Our data showed that CMV infection is a common complication after kidney transplantation associated with older age, induction treatment with antilymphocyte globulin, worse renal function, and increased patient morbidity.     

Risk Factors of Cytomegalovirus Infection After Pediatric Liver Transplantation

PurposeCytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is known to be the most frequently viral infection among patients after liver transplantation. This is especially true in pediatric living-donor liver transplantation because the recipients have often not been infected with CMV and postoperative primary infection with CMV frequently occurs.Patients and MethodsOf 93 patients who underwent pediatric liver transplantation at our department, 33 patients (36.3%) were diagnosed with CMV infection using the antigenemia method (C7-HRP). Retrospective review and statistical analysis were conducted to confirm risk factors of post-transplantation CMV infection.ResultPositive lymphocytes were diagnosed between postoperative days 8 and 111 after transplantation. Ganciclovir or foscavir were administrated to 21 patients. The other 10 patients who had one positive lymphocyte were observed and the cell disappeared on follow-up examination. We did not observe any cases of positive lymphocytes with C7-HRP in patients who received a graft from a CMV antibody?negative donor. Independent predictors associated with CMV infection in the multivariable analysis were administration of OKT3 and grafts from CMV antibody?positive donors.ConclusionIn CMV infection after pediatric liver transplantation, cases with CMV antibody?positive donors and with OKT3 administration for acute rejection are considered high risk, and cases with CMV antibody?negative donors are considered low risk.     

Cytomegalovirus antigenemia directed pre-emptive prophylaxis with oral versus I.V. ganciclovir for the prevention of cytomegalovirus disease in liver transplant recipients: a randomized, controlled trial

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of pre-emptively administered oral ganciclovir in preventing cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease has not been documented in liver transplant recipients. We sought to compare the efficacy of pre-emptive oral ganciclovir with that of i.v. ganciclovir for the prevention of CMV disease after liver transplantation, and to determine whether withholding prophylaxis in the absence of CMV antigenemia, reliably identified patients in whom no prophylaxis was necessary. METHODS: Surveillance cultures for CMV pp65 antigenemia were performed in all patients at weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 16. Patients with CMV antigenemia were randomized into two study groups. The experimental group received oral ganciclovir for 6 weeks (2 g t.i.d. for 2 weeks, then 1 g t.i.d. for 4 weeks), and the control group received i.v. ganciclovir (5 mg/kg q 12 hr) for 7 days. RESULTS: Of 72 consecutive liver transplant recipients studied, CMV antigenemia occurred in 31% (22 of 72). Twenty-two patients with asymptomatic antigenemia were randomized to two study groups. CMV disease (viral syndrome) occurred in 9% (1 of 11) of the patients in the i.v. ganciclovir group and in 0% (0 of 11) of the patients in the oral ganciclovir group. None of the study patients developed tissue invasive CMV disease. The median reduction in antigenemia level with oral ganciclovir was 55% at week 1, and 100% at week 2. Overall, 64% of the patients by week 1, 93% by week 2, and 100% by week 4 had antigenemia levels below the baseline after oral ganciclovir. Of 50 patients without CMV antigenemia, none developed CMV disease. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-emptive prophylaxis based on CMV antigenemia can effectively target the patients for CMV prophylaxis; 69% of the patients never received antiviral prophylaxis and did not develop CMV disease. Antiviral therapy instituted upon detection of antigenemia prevented tissue invasive CMV in both ganciclovir groups. Pre-emptively administered oral ganciclovir was effective as prophylaxis for CMV disease after liver transplantation.     

Monitoring of human cytomegalovirus infections in heart transplant recipients by pp65 antigenemia

BACKGROUND: Rapid diagnostic techniques offer the opportunity of early diagnosis of human cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in immunocompromized patients at risk of developing CMV disease and syndrome. The use of CMV pp65 antigenemia as a predictor of CMV syndrome and disease in heart transplant recipient after induction therapy was studied retrospectively. METHODS: One hundred and nineteen consecutive heart transplant recipients treated with induction therapy who survived more then 14 d were monitored for CMV infection. Ninety-four recipients were seropositive for CMV. Twenty-five recipients were seronegative for CMV and received grafts from seropositive donors. Pre-emptive therapy was used in seropositive patients when CMV pp65 antigenemia was greater than 50 antigen-positive cells per 2 x 10(5) peripheral blood leukocytes (PBL); prophylactic therapy was done only in seronegative recipient matched with seropositive donor. RESULTS: High-level CMV pp65 antigenemia (50 antigen-positive cells 2 x 10(5) PBL) occurred in 34% (41 of 119) of patients at a median of 44 d following transplantation. In seropositive recipients, 16% (15 of 94) of patients developed CMV invasive disease or syndrome, and in seronegative recipients 20% (5 of 25) of patients developed CMV disease or syndrome. Sixty-six per cent (62 of 94) of CMV seropositive patients were identified as not requiring pre-emptive therapy. In seropositive and seronegative recipients, the sensibility and negative predictive value of the cut-off level of 50 antigen positive cell for CMV disease and syndrome was 100%. The specificity was 79% and positive predictive value was 49%. CONCLUSION: Because of the excellent sensibility and negative predictive value of the cut-off level of 50 antigen positive cell per 2 x 10(5) PBL, application of pre-emptive therapy guided by high level of CMV pp65 antigenemia in the context of induction therapy allow to omit antiviral therapy in many at risk patients. In the context of pre-emptive and prophylactic therapy, the cut-off level of 50 antigen positive cell do not allow to predict with accuracy the development of CMV disease or syndrome.     

Cytomegalovirus infection after renal transplantation: selective prophylaxis and treatment

We have reviewed our experience in selective cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection prophylaxis and treatment in our renal transplant population. Between 1996 and 2001, 263 cadaveric renal transplant recipients had at least 6 months follow up. Immunosuppression was based on cyclosporine Neoral (n=108) or tacrolimus (n=155). CMV infection prophylaxis (oral acyclovir or gancyclovir at half usual doses) was only prescribed in recipients receiving a CMV positive ve kidney and in recipients treated with OKT3. CMV infection was diagnosed by a positive pp65 antigenemia upon appearance of CMV-related symptoms, leading to specific treatment (IV ganciclovir) only if symptoms were intense or there was visceral involvement. Thus, no preemptive treatment or programmed or periodic antigenemia was performed in any case. Nineteen episodes of symptomatic CMV infection were diagnosed (prevalence 7.2%). The frequency was similar for all immunosuppressive regimens. Only 9 of 19 (47%) of patients were given IV ganciclovir; the others were not treated. All patients survived without apparent complications, relapses, or recurrences. No oral gancyclovir was delivered after IV treatment. Our CMV prophylaxis protocol was limited to high-risk patients, using lower gancyclovir dosages than those usually advocated. It does not include programmed or scheduled search for CMV antigenemia in asymptomatic renal transplant patients. Despite these factors, our CMV infection rate and severity were similar to those reported with more aggressive protocols, with extended prophylaxis, preemptive therapy, or intense surveillance.