Randomised controlled trial of the effect of evidence based information on women's willingness to participate in cervical cancer screening

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess whether providing women with additional information on the pros and cons of screening, compared with information currently offered by the NHS, affects their intention to attend for screening. DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either the control, (based on an NHS Cervical Screening Programme leaflet currently used), or the intervention leaflet (containing additional information on risks and uncertainties). SETTING: Three general practices in Birmingham. PARTICIPANTS: 300 women aged 20 to 64 attending the practices during a one month period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Intention to attend for screening. Main results: 283 women (94.3%) completed the study. Fewer women in the intervention (79%) than the control group (88%) expressed intention to have screening after reading the information leaflet (difference between groups 9.2%, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 3.2% to 21.7%). The crude odds ratio (OR) and 95% CI was 0.50 (0.26 to 0.97). After adjusting for other factors, the trend persisted (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.28 to 1.29). Having a previous Pap smear was the only significant predictor of intention to have screening (adjusted OR 2.54, 95% CI 1.03 to 6.21). Subgroup analysis showed no intervention effect in intended uptake between women at higher and lower risk of cervical cancer (p=0.59). CONCLUSIONS: Providing women with evidence based information on the risks, uncertainties, and the benefits of screening, is likely to deter some, but not differentially those at higher risk.     

Comparison of the smoking behaviour and attitudes of smokers who believe they have smoking-related problems with those who do not

BACKGROUND: Motivation to stop smoking is associated with smokers' possessing substantial smoking-related morbidity or believing that they have symptoms caused by smoking, but it is not clear if this holds for smokers attending general practice consultations. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to compare the attitudes and behaviour of smokers attending their GP with symptoms that they believe are smoking related with those who do not. METHOD: A cross-sectional, pre-consultation survey of patients attending GPs in Leicester, UK was carried out. RESULTS: A total of 83.8% (2955/3525) of people attending GPs completed the questionnaire and 34.7% were smokers. Multiple logistic regression showed that where smokers perceived that their problems were smoking related they were more likely to have tried stopping in the past [odds ratio (OR) 1.78, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.26-2.67], to want to stop smoking (OR 1.83, CI 1.15-2.9) or to intend to stop in the near future (OR 1.58, CI 1.03-2.43). CONCLUSION: Smokers who attend GPs' routine consultations and believe that they have smoking-related problems are more motivated to stop than others. This suggests that it is important for GPs to ascertain patients' views about the aetiology of their symptoms before discussing smoking with them.     

Attitudes, beliefs, and knowledge as predictors of nonattendance in a Swedish population-based mammography screening program

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of mammography screening could be improved if factors that influence nonattendance were better understood. METHODS: We examined attitudes, beliefs, and knowledge in relation to nonattendance in a population-based mammography screening program, using a case-control design. Data were collected from November 1997 to March 1998 through telephone interviews with 434 nonattenders and 515 attenders identified in a population-based mammography register in central Sweden. The questions asked drew primarily upon the components constituting the Health Belief Model. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis showed that nonattendance was most common among women within the highest quartile of perceived emotional barriers, compared to women within the lowest quartile (OR = 4.81; 95% CI 2.96-7.82). Women who worried most about breast cancer were more likely to attend than those who worried least (OR = 0.09; 95% CI 0.02-0.31). Women with the highest scores of perceived benefits were more likely to attend than women with the lowest ones (OR = 0.35; 95% CI 0.08-0.75). Other factors associated with nonattendance were less knowledge about mammography and breast cancer, lack of advice from a health professional to participate, and very poor trust in health care. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that increased participation in outreach mammography screening programs can be achieved through enhancement of breast cancer awareness and possibly by reducing some of the modifiable barriers. mammography; mass screening; breast cancer; attitudes; Sweden.     

Correlates of Intent to Seek Unnecessary Pap Tests Among Elderly Women

PURPOSE: Cervical cancer screening may be over-used by elderly women who might not benefit from the test. The purpose of this study was to examine the relative importance of objective factors (e.g. intact cervix) and subjective factors (e.g. patients' Pap-smear related beliefs/attitudes) as correlates of elderly women's intention to have a Pap smear. METHODS: This study was a secondary data analysis using a subset sample of the elderly women (>or=65 years) who participated in the Texas Tech 5000 Survey Wave 4, a cross-sectional phone interview study conducted in 2002. Intent to have a Pap test, previous gynecologic history, and beliefs/attitudes related to Pap tests were measured. chi2 tests and logistic regression were conducted. RESULTS: Among the 1,044 women in the analytical sample, 70.2% (733) reported intending to have a Pap smear test within the next 2 years. About 77% (449/582) of the women who had not undergone a hysterectomy reported the intend to have a Pap smear, whereas 62% (284/462) of the women who had undergone a hysterectomy reported the same intent (chi 2 = 30.26; df = 1; p = .000). Among women who had undergone a hysterectomy, having received a Pap smear within the past 2 years (odds ratio OR, 21.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 11.52-39.47), perceiving that their doctors might feel having the test is a good idea (OR, 7.14; 95% CI, 3.15-16.19), and insurance covering the test (OR, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.18-4.15) were positive correlates of intent to have a Pap test. Among women who had not undergone a hysterectomy, previous Pap smear history (OR, 19.28; 95% CI, 10.15-37.10), perceived doctor's opinion (OR, 5.39; 95% CI, 2.38-12.19), perceived pain of the test (OR, 0.52; 95% CI, .28-.99), perceived importance (OR, 4.00; 95% CI, 1.32-12.10), and perceived risk of developing cervical cancer (OR, 4.27; 95% CI, 1.27-14.33) were correlates. CONCLUSIONS: Public health educational messages intended to increase appropriate use of Pap screening should include factual information about risk factors such as age and possession of an intact cervix. Other messages intended to reduce inappropriate use of Pap screening should be directed at physicians, since many elderly women intend to inappropriately seek Pap tests based on erroneous beliefs/attitudes.     

Reasons women do not attend screening for cervical cancer: a population-based study in Sweden

BACKGROUND: With an improved compliance with screening a larger reduction of cervical cancer incidence would be within reach. We aimed at investigating why certain women do not attend Pap smear screening and at validating the reliability of self-reported screening. METHODS: In 1998 in the county of Uppsala, Sweden, information was collected through telephone interviews with 430 nonattendees and 514 attendees to Pap smear screening, who were all sampled from a population-based database. The women's recall of attendance was validated against the database. The main outcome measures used were odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Non-attendance was positively associated with nonuse of oral contraceptives (OR = 3.56, 95% CI 2.18-5.83), seeing different gynecologists (OR = 1.90, 95% CI 1.34-2.70), and seeing a physician very often (OR = 3.12, 95% CI 1.45-6.70) or not at all (OR = 1.78, 95% CI 1.09-2.90). Frequent condom use (OR = 1.88, 95% CI 1.02-3.47), living in rural/semirural areas (OR = 1.55, 95% CI 1.07-2.21), and not knowing the recommended screening interval (OR = 2.16, 95% CI 1.20-3.89) were all associated with nonattendance, whereas socioeconomic status was not, when tested in a multivariate model. Among the nonattendees, 57% underestimated the time lapse since last smear. CONCLUSIONS: Seeing a gynecologist on a regular basis and information guiding women to have a Pap smear on their own initiative are important factors for recurrent screening. Therefore, information should be given to all women about the purpose and benefits of Pap smear testing. Self-reports on screening should be treated with caution.     

Knowledge, Attitudes, and Interest in Breast-Ovarian Cancer Gene Testing: A Survey of a Large African-American Kindred with a BRCA1 Mutation

BACKGROUND: This study assessed counseling and testing needs from the perspective of adult members of a large African-American kindred with a BRCA1 mutation. METHODS: Interviews were conducted with 95 male and female kindred members to elicit information on sociodemographics, attitudes toward health care providers, breast cancer screening behaviors, and religious/spiritual beliefs, as well as to evaluate psychological distress, beliefs, knowledge, and attitudes related to genetic testing. RESULTS: Knowledge about breast and ovarian cancer genetics was limited. Adherence to screening recommendations was low among females with no personal breast or ovarian cancer history. The majority (67%) wished to discuss risk factors with a health care provider. Most participants (82%) indicated that they would have a genetic test if it were available. Significant predictors of intent to undergo testing were having at least one first-degree relative with breast and/or ovarian cancer (OR = 5.1; 95% CI = 1.2-20.9) and perceived risk of being a gene carrier > or =50% (OR = 64.3; 95% CI = 5.1-803.9) or reporting that they did not know their risk of being a gene carrier (OR = 10.9; 95% CI = 2.1-57.7). Cited barriers to testing included cost and availability. CONCLUSION: There is a high interest level in genetic testing despite limited knowledge about cancer genetics among these high-risk African Americans. Our study provides information for designing a genetic education and counseling intervention for this and similar families.     

Hispanic acculturation and utilization of cervical cancer screening in the US

BACKGROUND: Hispanic women have an incidence rate of invasive cervical cancer that is twice as high as that of non-Hispanic White women. Previous investigations have reported that Hispanics are less likely to utilize cancer screening services. Using data from the 2000 National Health Interview Survey, this study examined whether acculturation of Hispanic women was associated with cervical cancer screening. METHODS: The subjects included 2307 Hispanic women aged 21-70 who did not have a history of cervical cancer or a hysterectomy. Women were analyzed by acculturation level according to whether or not they ever had a Pap smear and had one in the previous year and previous 3 years. RESULTS: Acculturation levels tended to be inversely correlated with no Pap smear. Compared to lower acculturated women, women who were more acculturated were less likely to never had a Pap smear (OR = 0.86; 95% CI = 0.58-1.27 for moderate acculturated women and OR = 0.51; 95% CI = 0.29-0.89 for higher acculturated women). Similar results were found for having no Pap smear within the past 3 years (OR = 0.83; 95% CI = 0.61-1.13 for moderate acculturated women and OR = 0.73; 95% CI = 0.49-1.08 for higher acculturated women). CONCLUSION: The findings show that lower acculturation was associated with the under use of cervical cancer screening and suggest that these women might have barriers in accessing and utilizing Pap smears.     

Maximizing the motivational impact of feedback of lung cancer susceptibility on smokers' desire to quit

This two-by-two factorially designed study evaluate approaches for communicating feedback of lung cancer susceptibility to smokers as a method for motivating smoking cessation. The study factors were: method of communicating feedback (by mail with telephone follow-up or in-person) and carbon monoxide feedback (yes or no). One-hundred-forty-four smokers were stratified on race and randomized to one of four conditions. Participants were surveyed at baseline and 2-month follow-up. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing for the absence of the glutathione S transferase mu (GSTM1) gene was the susceptibility marker. Regardless of counseling method or carbon monoxide (CO) feedback, the majority (90%) of smokers accurately recalled the test result and 66% accurately interpreted the meaning of the test result. Smokers who received their result in person were significantly less likely to have read the result booklet than those in the telephone counseling group (OR = .28, 95%; CI .12-.62; p < .05). Neither counseling method nor CO feedback increased smokers' perceived risks for lung cancer. However, at the counseling session those who received in-person counseling were significantly less frightened by the test result than those who received telephone counseling (OR = .42, 95%; CI .20-86; p < .05) and at the 2-month follow-up those who received a CO test were significantly less frightened by their susceptibility result (OR = .40, 95%; CI .17-.92; p < .05) than those who did not have a CO test. Evaluation of further refinements in communicating the meaning of susceptibility results to motivate smoking cessation is warranted.     

Understanding the role of violence in incarcerated women's cervical cancer screening and history

In this exploratory study the authors investigated characteristics, including reported experiences of violence, related to incarcerated women's self-report of cervical cancer screening and cancer history and treatment. During a four month period in 2010, 204 women in Kansas City jails were surveyed. Multiple logistic regression models were used to examine the relations of socio-demographic and community characteristics and history of violence among the women to their cervical cancer screening, diagnosis, and treatment histories. Forty percent of the women in the current sample reported abnormal Pap histories, though only 6% of all Pap smears done in the U.S. are abnormal. Women who reported abuse histories in this study were found to be more likely to report having ever had an abnormal Pap smear (for physical abuse Odds Ratio [OR] = 6.05; CI 2.36, 15.54 and for past year intimate partner violence OR = 2.41; CI 1.09, 5.31). Participants who did not fear neighborhood violence were less likely to report an abnormal Pap history (OR = 0.57; CI 0.34, 0.96) and more likely to visit a family doctor for their Pap screenings (OR = 1.91; CI 1.01, 3.60). Women who perceived greater neighborhood violence had increased odds of reporting that they received Pap screenings in a hospital setting (OR = 1.47; CI 1.08, 2.00). Frequency of Pap screening did not differ in women who did and did not have fear of neighborhood violence. This study highlights the heightened cervical cancer risk experienced by women with criminal justice histories and suggests that violence at several levels has implications for cervical cancer prevention for these women.     

Limited Pap screening associated with reduced risk of cervical cancer in South Africa

BACKGROUND: We investigated the effect of Pap smear screening on the incidence of invasive cancer of the cervix in the Western Cape, South Africa where screening is limited. METHODS: Data were derived from a case-control study of the association of hormonal contraceptives and invasive cervical cancer. Incident cases (n = 524) of invasive cervical cancer who presented at two tertiary hospitals and controls (n = 1540) series matched for age, race, and place of residence were interviewed. Information on a wide range of variables was collected including whether the women had previously had a Pap smear taken and the number and timing of smears. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% CI were calculated using multiple logistic regression. RESULTS: The OR of cervical cancer was reduced among women who had ever had a smear (OR = 0.3, 95% CI: 0.3-0.4). The OR declined with increasing number of smears to 0.2 for >/=>3 smears (trend P = 0.0003). Among women who had a smear <5 years previously the OR was 0.3, but even if the smear was taken >/=15 years previously the women remained at reduced risk (OR = 0.5). CONCLUSION: The data suggest that even limited Pap smear screening reduces the risk of cervical cancer. Should a screening programme be successfully implemented, the incidence of cervical cancer might be reduced by as much as 70%.     

Addressing Taiwan's high incidence of cervical cancer: factors associated with the Nation's low compliance with Papanicolaou screening in Taiwan

BACKGROUND: Despite cervical cancer being the leading female cancer, women in Taiwan have received fewer screening examinations for this disease than populations in Western countries. METHODS: Randomly selected telephone questionnaire interviews with women aged 20 years and over were conducted to investigate the factors associated with the subject's cancer screening practices. RESULTS: Among 1021 respondents, 51.6% self-reported no Papanicolaou (Pap) examination received within their lifetime. The multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that, in addition to marital status, cancer knowledge was the most significant factor associated with screening practice compliance. Compared with women with correct answers for 22-28 cancer knowledge questions, the odds ratios (OR) for non-compliance were 1.4 (95% confidence interval (CI)=1.0-2.0) for women with 17-21 correct answers and 2.3 (95% CI=1.6-3.4) for women with less than 17 correct answers. Women aged 40-49 years had the best cancer knowledge scores. Unmarried women were at an elevated risk for no Pap examination (OR=7.6, 95% CI=5.2-11.3). CONCLUSIONS: Women in Taiwan should be targeted for intervention to promote cancer knowledge and screening compliance.     

The influence of marital status on the use of breast,cervical, and colorectal cancer screening

PurposeTo examine the impact of marital status on the use of screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer.MethodsWe relied on 2012 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey age-appropriate screening cohorts. Appropriate screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer was determined according to United States Preventive Services Task Force recommendations in effect at the time of the 2012 survey. Complex samples logistic regression models were performed to examine the effect of marital status on cancer screening.ResultsOverall, 81.6, 83.9, and 68.9% of married participants underwent breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer, respectively, relative to 74.2, 75.1, and 60.9% for divorced/widowed/separated, individuals, and 74.7, 78.7, and 53.4% for never married individuals. Marital status (married vs. never married) was an independent predictor of screening for all cancers examined: breast cancer, odds ratio (OR): 1.42 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.25–1.61); cervical cancer, OR: 1.29 (95% CI: 1.16–1.43); colorectal cancer, OR: 1.63 (95% CI: 1.51–1.77). Gender-specific subgroup analyses for colorectal cancer suggests that marital status may exert a greater effect in men, relative to women (married men: OR 1.75, 95% CI: 1.56–1.96; married women: OR: 1.52, 95% CI: 1.35–1.70).ConclusionBeing married is associated with increased utilization of breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening. The influence of marital status was greater in men relative to women eligible for colorectal cancer screening. Our results emphasize the importance of social determinants of health-seeking behaviors.     

Dietary intakes of selected nutrients and food groups and risk of cervical cancer

We investigated the relationships between intakes of selected dietary nutrients and food groups and risk of cervical cancer in a hospital-based, case-control study including 239 cases diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix and 979 hospital patients with nonneoplastic diagnoses who completed a self-administered questionnaire between 1982 and 1998 at Roswell Park Cancer Institute. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated by unconditional logistic regression adjusting for age, education, smoking status, use of oral contraceptives, barrier contraceptives and spermicides, family history of cervical cancer, year questionnaire completed, and energy intake. Significant reductions in risk of approximately 40-60% were observed for women in the highest vs. lowest tertiles of dietary fiber (OR=0.59, 95% CI=0.37-0.94), vitamin C (OR=0.52, 95% CI=0.33-0.80), vitamin E (OR=0.44, 95% CI=0.27-0.72), vitamin A (OR=0.47, 95% CI=0.30-0.73), alpha-carotene (OR=0.41, 95% CI=0.27-0.63), beta-carotene (OR=0.44, 95% CI=0.29-0.68), lutein (OR=0.51, 95% CI=0.33-0.79), folate (OR=0.55, 95% CI=0.34-0.88), and total fruit and vegetable intake (OR=0.52, 95% CI=0.34-0.77). Our findings suggest that a diet rich in plant-based nutrients may be important in reducing the risk of cervical cancer.     

Genetic testing for colon cancer among African-Americans in North Carolina

OBJECTIVE: To describe attitudes and correlates of intention to take a genetic test for colon cancer in a population-based sample of African-Americans. METHODS: African-Americans (n = 658), age 18-70, in North Carolina completed an 11-page questionnaire between June-October 2003 that assessed attitudes (familiarity, perceived benefits and risks, anxiety, and confidentiality) and intention to take a genetic test for colon cancer and various participant characteristics. RESULTS: Respondents expressed favorable attitudes and high intention regarding genetic testing for colon cancer: 87% would definitely/probably take a genetic test, although only 42% had read/heard a lot or some about genetic testing. Most agreed that genetic test results should be available to healthcare providers (79%) but not to health insurers (62%) or employers (82%). About a third were concerned that genetic testing could lead to discrimination. Correlates of intention differed by sex. Perceived benefits were significantly positively associated with intention among all respondents. However, being married (OR = 2.1, 95% CI: 1.2, 3.7), doctor as the main source of health information (OR = 2.4, 95% CI: 1.4, 3.9), and colon cancer family history (OR = 4.3, 95% CI: 1.6, 11.6) were significant only for women; some college education (OR = 4.1, 95% CI: 1.7, 9.7), importance of sharing test results with relatives (OR = 5.5, 95% CI: 1.6, 18.7), and colon cancer screening history (OR = 3.4, 95% CI: 1.6, 7.5) were only significant for men. CONCLUSIONS: Respondents expressed high interest in genetic testing for colon cancer risk, although confidentiality of test results is a concern. Guidelines and policies for genetic testing specific to African-Americans should be established and future research should examine the prevalence of genetic testing.     

Predictors of attendance at a relocatable mammography service for rural women

Abstract: This study aimed to identify factors that predicted attendance at a relocatable screening mammography service in a rural centre in Victoria. A cohort design was used whereby 180 women from the target population were interviewed by telephone two weeks before the service moved to the area for a 10–week period of operation. Attendance data were ascertained from service records. Fifty per cent of the sample attended the service. Significant predictors of attendance were: mammographic history, with women who reported previous screening mammography being less likely to attend than women who had not had a previous mammogram (odds ratio (OR) 0.38, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.17 to 0.83); perception of personal risk for breast cancer, with women who perceived at least some risk being more likely to attend than women who perceived no risk (OR 2.73, CI 1.07 to 6.99); stated intention of attending (OR 2.01, CI 1.49 to 2.71); knowing the correct location of the service (OR 3.08, CI 1.37 to 6.89); and education, with higher education being associated with a lower likelihood of attending (OR 0.65, CI 0.44 to 0.96). Our study raised some issues, including the high prevalence of rural women who reported a previous screening mammogram, although BreastScreen services had not previously been available in their area; factors underlying perceptions of personal risk for breast cancer; and the generalisability of our finding of an inverse relationship between higher education and attendance for screening.     

Empowerment beliefs and intention to uptake cervical cancer screening: three psychosocial mediating mechanisms

Three studies tested if the associations between women's empowerment beliefs and intentions to attend cervical cancer screening could be explained by mediating psychological mechanisms: control-related beliefs, well being-related beliefs, and beliefs and evaluations referring to social functioning. Data were collected from January to March 2011 in the rural and urban areas across regions of Poland. Study 1 (N = 386) indicated that women with strong empowerment harbored stronger self-efficacy and beliefs that screening participation would make them feel in control of their own health and body. These two types of cognitions were, in turn, associated with stronger cervical cancer screening intentions. Results of Study 2 (N = 527) confirmed three significant well being-related mediators in the relationship between empowerment beliefs and cervical cancer screening: perceived benefits of screening related to well being, appearance satisfaction, discomfort- and shame-related barriers for screening. Finally, Study 3 (N = 424) showed that empowerment enabled receiving higher social support for cervical cancer screening, promoted perceiving fewer barriers for cervical cancer screening-related communication and more social benefits of engaging in cervical cancer screening. Support for cervical cancer screening, social barriers, and benefits were, in turn, related to screening intentions. Across the studies similar shares of intention variance were explained, and thus the hypothesized mediating mechanisms may have similar explanatory power.     

Risk factors of invasive cervical cancer in Mali

BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer is the most common cancer in women in Mali and the second commonest cause of cancer mortality. METHODS: As part of an international effort to evaluate the role of human papillomavirus (HPV) in the aetiology of cervical cancer, we conducted a hospital-based case-control study in three medical centres in Bamako during 1994-1995. A total of 82 cases (invasive cervical cancer patients) and 97 controls matched to the cases for age were included. Information on risk factors was collected through personal interview. Serum antibodies to HPV 16, 18 and 31 virus like particles (VLP) were detected using ELISA assays. Polymerase chain reaction was used to detect HPV DNA in frozen biopsies of cases. RESULTS: Human papillomavirus 6, 18, 31 VLP were detected in 60.4% of cases and 45.4% of controls (P = 0.03). Overall, HPV DNA was identified in 96.9% of the cervical cancer cases. Risk factors for cervical cancer were parity >10 versus <5 children ([odds ratio] OR = 4.8, 95% CI : 1.5-14.7), never having practised vaginal douching (OR = 17.6, 95% CI : 4.2-74.7), re-using home-made feminine napkins (OR = 45.9, 95% CI : 8.8-238.7) and having a husband with more than two wives (OR = 5.3, 95% CI : 1.3-21.3). CONCLUSIONS: These data provide further evidence on the role of HPV in cervical cancer and show that high parity and poor genital hygiene conditions were the main co-factors for cervical cancer in this population with prevalent HPV infection.     

BMI与宫颈癌发病风险的Meta分析

目的 探讨BMI与宫颈癌发病风险的关系。方法 采用系统评价方法,在EMbase、The Cochrane Library、PubMed、CNKI、WanFang Data和VIP数据库上,检索BMI与宫颈癌发病关系的文献,检索时限均从建库至2019年5月,整个过程由2名研究者独立筛选文献、提取资料并评价纳入研究的偏倚风险,采用Stata 12.0软件进行Meta分析。结果 共纳入15个研究,共计1 178 773名研究对象。Meta分析结果显示:超重人群患宫颈癌的风险是正常体重人群的1.10倍（OR = 1.10,95％CI:1.04～1.16,P = 0.001）,肥胖人群患宫颈癌的风险是正常体重人群的1.34倍（OR = 1.34,95％CI:1.16～1.55,P＜0.001）,差异均有统计学意义。结论 超重和肥胖均会增加宫颈癌发病风险,超重与宫颈癌发病风险之间的相关性较弱,但肥胖与宫颈癌发病风险之间有显著的相关性。     

女性激素替代治疗、口服避孕药与女性肺癌关系的Meta分析

目的探讨女性激素替代治疗(HRT)与口服避孕药(OCs)对女性肺癌的影响。方法搜索Medline等计算机数据库,系统收集相关文献。采用固定模型或随机效应模型(研究结果存在异质性)计算合并OR。结果纳入Meta分析的文献共12篇,其中3篇为队列研究,9篇为病例对照研究。Meta分析HRT与肺癌合并OR值为0.88(95%CI:0.77～1.01)。按是否吸烟进行分层分析,吸烟者与非吸烟者中HRT的合并OR值分别为0.76(95%CI:0.61～0.95)和0.78(95%CI:0.64～0.95)。口服避孕药与女性肺癌无统计学关联(OR=0.95;95%CI:0.83～1.20)。结论HRT可能降低女性肺癌发生的危险度,其结果还需要进一步深入研究来验证。