A comparative randomized trial to assess the impact of oral contraceptive pretreatment on follicular growth and hormone profiles in GnRH antagonist-treated patients

BACKGROUND: This randomized controlled trial was designed to assess the impact of oral contraceptive (OC) scheduling with a GnRH antagonist (ganirelix) regimen on the ovarian response of women undergoing recombinant FSH (rFSH) stimulation for IVF, compared with a non-scheduled ganirelix regimen and a long GnRH agonist (nafarelin) protocol. METHODS: A total of 110 women was treated with an OC and ganirelix, 111 with ganirelix alone and 111 with nafarelin. The OC (containing 30 microg ethinylestradiol/150 microg desogestrel) was taken for 14-28 days and stopped 2 days prior to the start of rFSH treatment. Primary efficiency parameters were the number of cumulus-oocyte complexes (per attempt) and the number of grade 1 or 2 embryos (per attempt). RESULTS: In terms of follicular growth and hormone profiles, the OC-scheduled antagonist regimen mimicked the agonist regimen rather than the (non-scheduled) GnRH antagonist regimen. In the OC-scheduled GnRH antagonist group and the nafarelin group (versus the non-scheduled antagonist group), pituitary suppression was more profound at the start of stimulation (P < or = 0.001), there was a slower start of follicular growth (P < or = 0.001), longer stimulation was required (11.7 and 10.3 days respectively versus 9.4; P < or = 0.001), and more rFSH was used (2667 and 2222 IU versus 1966 IU; P < or = 0.001). In the three groups, the number of oocytes was similar (13.1, 12.9 and 11.5 respectively; not significant) as well as the number of good quality embryos (5.1, 5.7 and 5.0 respectively; not significant). CONCLUSION: OC treatment prior to the rFSH/ganirelix regimen can be successfully applied to schedule patients, although more days of stimulation and more rFSH are required than with a non-scheduled GnRH antagonist regimen.     

Use of a single bolus of GnRH agonist triptorelin to trigger ovulation after GnRH antagonist ganirelix treatment in women undergoing ovarian stimulation for assisted reproduction, with special reference to the prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: preliminary report: short communication

A new treatment option for patients undergoing ovarian stimulation is the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol, with the possibility to trigger a mid-cycle LH surge using a single bolus of GnRH agonist, reducing the risk of developing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in high responders and the chance of cycle cancellation. This report describes the use of 0.2 mg triptorelin (Decapeptyl) to trigger ovulation in eight patients who underwent controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with recombinant FSH (rFSH, Puregon) and concomitant treatment with the GnRH antagonist ganirelix (Orgalutran) for the prevention of premature LH surges. All patients were considered to have an increased risk for developing OHSS (at least 20 follicles > or =11 mm and/or serum oestradiol at least 3000 pg/ml). On the day of triggering the LH surge, the mean number of follicles > or =11 mm was 25.1 +/- 4.5 and the median serum oestradiol concentration was 3675 (range 2980-7670) pg/ml. After GnRH agonist injection, endogenous serum LH and FSH surges were observed with median peak values of 219 and 19 IU/l respectively, measured 4 h after injection. The mean number of oocytes obtained was 23.4 +/- 15.4, of which 83% were mature (metaphase II). None of the patients developed any signs or symptoms of OHSS. So far, four clinical pregnancies have been achieved from the embryos obtained during these cycles, including the first birth following this approach. It is concluded that GnRH agonist effectively triggers an endogenous LH surge for final oocyte maturation after ganirelix treatment in stimulated cycles. Our preliminary results suggest that this regimen may prove effective in triggering ovulation and could be said to prevent OHSS in high responders. The efficacy and safety of such new treatment regimen needs to be established in comparative randomized studies.     

Recombinant human LH supplementation versus recombinant human FSH (rFSH) step-up protocol during controlled ovarian stimulation in normogonadotrophic women with initial inadequate ovarian response to rFSH. A multicentre, prospective, randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: In approximately 12-14% of young normogonadotrophic women treated with a depot GnRH agonist long protocol, the initial ovarian response to recombinant human FSH (rFSH) can be suboptimal. We have tested the hypothesis that these women may benefit from recombinant human LH (rLH) supplementation in a multicentre, prospective, randomized trial compared with patients treated with an rFSH step-up protocol. METHODS: A total of 260 young normogonadotrophic women undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation with a GnRH agonist long protocol for IVF/ICSI were enrolled. The starting dose of rFSH was 225 IU. One hundred and thirty patients with serum estradiol levels <180 pg/ml and with at least six follicles with a mean diameter >5 mm but none >10 mm on both day 5 and day 8 of stimulation were randomly allocated to two groups. From the eighth day of stimulation, women in group A (n=65) received 150 IU of rLH in addition to rFSH, while those in group B (n=65) had an increase of 150 IU in the daily dose of rFSH (step-up protocol). One hundred and thirty normally responding women continued monotherapy with rFSH and served as a further control population (group C). RESULTS: The mean number of cumulus-oocyte complexes retrieved in group A (9.0+/-4.3) was significantly higher (P<0.01) compared with group B (rFSH 6.1+/-2.6) but significantly lower compared with group C (10.49+/-3.7, P<0.05). Implantation and pregnancy rates were significantly lower (P<0.05) in the rFSH step-up group (10.5 and 29.3% respectively) when compared with normal responders (18.1 and 47.3% respectively). CONCLUSIONS: rLH supplementation is more effective than increasing the dose of rFSH in terms of ovarian outcome in patients with an initial inadequate ovarian response to rFSH alone.     

High doses of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist in in-vitro fertilization cycles do not adversely affect the outcome of subsequent freeze-thaw cycles.

The clinical application of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists instead of GnRH agonists, to prevent spontaneous premature luteinizing hormone surge during ovarian stimulation for assisted reproduction treatment has been advocated. A recent, double-blind, dose-finding study, including six dosages of the GnRH antagonist ganirelix, in women undergoing ovarian stimulation with recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), has indicated that high doses of GnRH antagonist (1 or 2 mg once daily) are associated with a low implantation rate. This follow-up study reports on the pregnancy rate after replacement of cryopreserved embryos obtained in stimulation cycles of the above-mentioned trial. Ovarian stimulation was initiated on day 2 of the cycle, with daily injections of 150 IU recombinant FSH. Ganirelix (0.0625, 0.125, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0 or 2.0 mg) was administered once daily from stimulation day 6 onwards, up to and including the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin. Retrieved oocytes were fertilized by in-vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection and a maximum of three fresh embryos was transferred. Excess embryos were frozen, and subsequently used in either natural or programmed cycles. Until June 1998, 11 ongoing pregnancies (12-16 weeks after embryo transfer) were achieved from 46 cycles in which embryos had been first frozen (23.9% per transfer). Six of these 11 patients had been treated with a high dose of ganirelix (1.0 or 2.0 mg) during the IVF cycles in which the embryos were obtained. In conclusion, our data suggest that high dosages of ganirelix do not adversely affect the potential of embryos to establish clinical pregnancy in freeze-thaw cycles.     

Addition of estradiol to progesterone for luteal supplementation in patients stimulated with GnRH antagonist/rFSH for IVF: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: The role of progesterone for luteal support in stimulated cycles for IVF is well established. However, controversy still surrounds the benefit of additional supplementation with estradiol (E2) in GnRH agonist (GnRHa) cycles, while no such data are available for GnRH antagonists. The aim of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to compare ongoing pregnancy rates in patients stimulated with recombinant FSH (rFSH) and GnRH antagonist for IVF, who received micronized progesterone for luteal phase supplementation, with or without the addition of E2. METHODS: Two hundred and one patients underwent ovarian stimulation with a fixed dose of 200 IU rFSH and GnRH antagonist. Patients were randomized to receive, for luteal phase supplementation, either 600 mg of micronized progesterone vaginally (n=100, progesterone group) or 600 mg of micronized progesterone and 4 mg of E2 valerate orally (n=101, progesterone/E2 group). The main outcome measure was ongoing pregnancy at 12 weeks per patient randomized. RESULTS: Demographics, stimulation parameters and embryological data were comparable for the two groups compared. Twenty-six ongoing pregnancies were achieved in the progesterone (26%) and 30 in the progesterone/E2 group (29.7%). (Difference: 3.7 and 95%, CI: -15.8 to 8.6%). CONCLUSION: It appears that the addition of E2 to progesterone in the luteal phase after stimulation with rFSH and GnRH antagonist does not enhance the probability of pregnancy.     

Profound LH suppression after GnRH antagonist administration is associated with a significantly higher ongoing pregnancy rate in IVF

BACKGROUND: The significance of suppressed LH levels in GnRH antagonist cycles for IVF outcome is currently unknown. The purpose of this study was to evaluate prospectively the association between LH levels and ongoing pregnancy achievement after GnRH antagonist initiation in IVF cycles. METHODS: Ovarian stimulation with a fixed dose of 200 IU recombinant FSH and daily GnRH antagonist (ganirelix) 0.25 mg from day 6 of stimulation was initiated in 116 women. Patients were not pretreated with an oral contraceptive. Induction of final oocyte maturation was performed with HCG 10,000 IU as soon as three follicles of > or =17 mm were present in ultrasound, and was followed by oocyte pick-up, conventional IVF or ICSI, and embryo transfer. The luteal phase was supplemented with vaginal progesterone. RESULTS: A significant decrease of both ongoing pregnancy rate and implantation rate was present across groups of patients with increasing LH levels. The highest implantation rate and ongoing pregnancy rate was present in those patients with LH levels on day 8 of stimulation < or =0.5 IU/l. CONCLUSIONS: Profound suppression of LH on day 8 of stimulation is associated with a significantly higher chance of achieving an ongoing pregnancy. More studies are necessary to evaluate this phenomenon further.     

GnRH agonist as luteal phase support in assisted reproduction technique cycles: results of a pilot study

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to investigate whether intranasal (IN) administration of a GnRH agonist could provide luteal support in IVF/ICSI patients. METHODS: Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) was performed using hMG/FSH and a GnRH antagonist. Patients were then randomly allocated to either 10,000 IU hCG, followed by vaginal administration of micronized progesterone (3x 200 mg/day) (group A), or 200 microg IN buserelin followed by either 100 microg every 2 days (group B), or 100 microg every day (group C), or 100 microg twice a day (group D), or 100 microg three times a day (group E). Luteal support was continued for 15 days. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients were randomized. Groups B and C were discontinued prematurely in view of the short luteal phase. The luteal phase was significantly shorter in groups B, C and D, whereas group E was comparable with group A, 13.5 and 13.0 days, respectively. In the mid-luteal phase, median progesterone levels were significantly lower in groups B, C and D, whereas group E was comparable with group A, 68.9 and 98.0 ng/ml, respectively. Estradiol (E2) was significantly reduced in groups B and D but sustained in group E. In the hCG group, LH levels were undetectable (<0.1 IU/l), whereas LH was detectable and significantly higher in groups C, D and E. Two pregnancies were obtained in the hCG group (two of five), one ectopic and one ongoing. Three pregnancies were obtained in group E, one miscarriage and two ongoing twin pregnancies (three of five). CONCLUSION: IN administration of buserelin may be effective in triggering follicular maturation and providing luteal phase support in patients undergoing assisted reproduction techniques (ART).     

Embryo implantation and GnRH antagonists: GnRH antagonists do not activate the GnRH receptor

Recent suggestions that gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists activate the GnRH receptor are discussed. Most of the studies cited in support of this suggestion are in-vitro studies, testing supra-pharmacological doses of GnRH analogues in cancer cell lines, whereas GnRH antagonists, e.g. ganirelix or cetrorelix, do not affect the steroidogenesis of human granulosa cells in vitro. In patients treated with GnRH antagonists prior to IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), oocyte maturity and fertilization rates are equal to those achieved following a long protocol of GnRH agonists. Although there is a tendency towards a lower pregnancy rate (not statistically significant) in the initial trials using GnRH antagonist with either recombinant FSH or human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) for ovarian stimulation, this new treatment option of GnRH antagonists facilitates short and simple treatment and improves the convenience and safety for the patient. As with GnRH agonists in the past, the clinical outcome of GnRH antagonist treatment will improve with time as more clinical experience is gained (learning curve) and the treatment protocol is optimized. Moreover, a GnRH agonist instead of human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) may be used for triggering ovulation and will decrease the cancellation rate and minimize the risk for developing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS).     

Obstetrical and neonatal outcome after controlled ovarian stimulation for IVF using the GnRH antagonist ganirelix

BACKGROUND: To establish long-term safety, follow-up data on pregnancy, birth and neonatal outcome were collected during clinical development trials with ganirelix (Orgalutran) in women undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation for conventional IVF or ICSI. METHODS: Results of an analysis of the pooled data of all follow-up data of the phase 2 and 3 programme for the development of ganirelix are presented. Obstetrical data on 340 ongoing pregnancies ( vertical line16 gestational weeks) after ganirelix treatment and 134 pregnancies after GnRH agonist treatment in a long protocol are shown. Furthermore, the neonatal outcome of 432 children [258 (75.9%) singletons, 72 (21.2%) twins and 10 (2.9%) triplets] born in the ganirelix group is presented and compared with 184 children [91 (67.9%) singletons, 36 (26.9%) twins and seven (5.2%) triplets] in the agonist group. RESULTS: There were no differences between the two groups in pregnancy loss after 16 weeks gestation. Incidence and nature of complications during pregnancy and delivery did not differ between the two groups. The overall mean gestational age was approximately 38.0 weeks, ranging from an average of 39 weeks for singletons to 34 weeks for triplets. No major differences were observed in neonatal characteristics of infants in the ganirelix and agonist groups, who had an overall mean birth weight of on average 3200 g for singletons, 2300 g for twins and 1800-1900 g for triplets. Congenital malformations were observed in 32 of 424 (7.5%) fetuses vertical line26 gestational weeks in the ganirelix group and in 10 of 181 (5.5%) in the agonist group. When applying a broad definition of major malformation (a major congenital malformation is a condition that causes functional impairment or requires surgical intervention) the rates were 4.5 versus 3.3 (odds ratio 1.37, 95% confidence interval 0.54-3.48) for the ganirelix and agonist group respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Reviewing the presented data and the literature on obstetric and neonatal outcome after conventional IVF or ICSI, we conclude that a controlled ovarian stimulation protocol including the novel GnRH antagonist ganirelix has been shown to be safe for pregnant women and their newborn babies.     

A relative reduction in mid-follicular LH concentrations during GnRH agonist IVF/ICSI cycles leads to lower live birth rates

BACKGROUND: The effect of early- and mid-follicular LH concentrations on the ovarian response and pregnancy outcomes was evaluated in women receiving pituitary down-regulation with a GnRH agonist and ovarian stimulation with recombinant FSH (rFSH) during IVF/ICSI treatment. METHODS: Blood samples were collected prospectively from 701 cycles (560 patients) of assisted reproduction and analysed retrospectively. On the basis of LH concentrations on stimulation day 7/8, the patients were divided into two groups: LH<1.2 IU/l (n=179) and LH>or=1.2 IU/l (n=522). Cycle outcomes were also compared on the basis of a ratio of mid- to early-follicular LH concentrations (0.5, n=491). RESULTS: Patients with low LH concentrations were found to have a significant reduction in the late-follicular estradiol concentrations (P<0.001), the number of oocytes retrieved (P<0.01) and the number of usable embryos (P<0.01), and they required significantly more rFSH (430 IU difference, P<0.01). These differences did not translate into a significant change in live birth rates. Conversely, a ratio of or=50%) was associated with a significant reduction in live birth rates per embryo transfer and per cycle started (27.3 versus 19.0%, P<0.05 and 22.2 versus 15.8%, P<0.05, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Low mid-follicular levels of LH have a significant impact on ovarian response but not on live birth rates. A fall in LH level of >or=50% from the early- to mid-follicular phase resulted in a lower live birth rate.     

The effect of an individualized GnRH antagonist protocol on folliculogenesis in IVF/ICSI

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the effect of an individualized GnRH antagonist regimen on folliculogenesis. METHODS: In a multicentre, randomized, clinical trial, IVF/ICSI patients were allocated to a standard regimen, in which they received daily 0.25 mg GnRH antagonist ganirelix (Orgalutran) from the 6th day of stimulation onward (fixed regimen n = 102) or to an individualized regimen, in which IVF/ICSI patients received daily 0.25 mg GnRH antagonist starting on the day that the dominant follicle had reached a diameter of > or = 15 mm (flexible regimen n = 103). The primary endpoint was to assess the difference in the total number of oocytes. RESULTS: The mean (SD) number of retrieved oocytes was not statistically significantly different: 9.4 (5.8) in the flexible group versus 9.7 (6.5) in the fixed group. The clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates were 22.7 and 21.8% respectively in the flexible group versus 33 and 31.1% in the fixed group [relative rate ratio 0.69 (95% confidence interval 0.44-1.08) and 0.7 (0.44-1.12) respectively]. CONCLUSION: The individualized flexible regimen did not result in an increase in the total number of oocytes obtained.     

A randomized, double-blind, multicentre clinical trial comparing starting doses of 150 and 200 IU of recombinant FSH in women treated with the GnRH antagonist ganirelix for assisted reproduction

BACKGROUND: Studies with the GnRH antagonist ganirelix in assistedreproduction have indicated that compared with traditional GnRHagonist downregulation protocols, slightly fewer oocytes areretrieved. In this study it was investigated whether an increasein the starting dose of recombinant FSH (rFSH) could compensatefor this loss. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, multicentreclinical trial comparing a starting dose of 150 and 200 IUof rFSH (follitropin ), in women undergoing treatment with theGnRH antagonist ganirelix. RESULTS: In total, 257 women weretreated with rFSH, of whom 131 received 150 IU and 126women 200 IU. Overall, 10.3 oocytes were retrieved in the150 IU group and 11.9 in the 200 IU group (P = 0.051).This difference became significant when women with cycle cancellationbefore HCG administration were excluded. Nearly 500 IUof additional rFSH was given in the high-dose group (2014 versus1541 IU). In the low-dose group, 4.6 high-quality embryoswere obtained compared with 4.5 in the high-dose group. Vitalpregnancy rates were similar (31 and 25% in the 150 and 200 IU-treatedwomen, respectively). Serum concentrations of FSH, estradioland progesterone were significantly higher in the high-dosegroup at day 6 of rFSH treatment and on the day of HCG administration.In the high-dose group, serum LH concentrations were higherat day 6 of rFSH treatment but lower at the day of HCG administration.CONCLUSION: By increasing the starting dose from 150 to 200 IUof rFSH, slightly more oocytes can be retrieved in GnRH antagonistprotocols for assisted reproduction. However, because this didnot translate into a higher number of high quality embryos,the clinical relevance of such a dose increase may be questioned.     

Is there a difference in the function of granulosa-luteal cells in patients undergoing in-vitro fertilization either with gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist or gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist?

Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) regulates gonadotrophin release. It has been shown that GnRH may have a direct effect on the ovary, as the addition of GnRH to granulosa cell cultures inhibits the production of progesterone and oestradiol. Specific GnRH receptors have been found to be present in rat and human granulosa cells. Desensitization of the pituitary by GnRH agonist has become common in in-vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment, usually by a long protocol of 2-3 weeks. With the introduction of GnRH antagonists, which produce an immediate blockage of the GnRH receptors, a much shorter exposure is needed of 3-6 days. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a GnRH agonist (buserelin) and a GnRH antagonist (cetrorelix) on the function of granulosa cells cultured in vitro from IVF patients. Women were treated by IVF randomized either to have buserelin nasal spray from the luteal phase in the previous cycle or cetrorelix from day 6 of the cycle. Both groups had ovarian stimulation with human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) 150 IU daily, i.e. HCG was administered when the follicles were larger than 17 mm, and aspirated 36 h later. Granulosa cells, separated and washed from large follicles containing ova, were pooled. After 48 h of pre-incubation, the granulosa cells were cultured for 4 days in medium with either added testosterone or cAMP with or without HCG, with change of medium after 2 days. The progesterone and oestradiol concentrations in the culture medium were measured by immunological assay, and cellular protein was measured by microprotein assay. The results showed that granulosa cells from women treated with GnRH antagonist (cetrorelix) responded earlier to the in-vitro hormone stimulation in terms of progesterone accumulation than women treated with the GnRH agonist (buserelin). This may have been due to difference in time of exposure to the analogue. The results may indicate that the luteal function is less impaired in GnRH antagonist treatment than in GnRH agonist treatment.     

Comparable clinical outcome using the GnRH antagonist ganirelix or a long protocol of the GnRH agonist triptorelin for the prevention of premature LH surges in women undergoing ovarian stimulation

This multicentre, randomized study was performed to assess theefficacy and safety of 0.25 mg ganirelix (Orgalutran^®, Antagon^TM)treatment, using triptorelin (Decapeptyl^®) in a long protocolas a reference treatment. In total, 236 subjects were randomizedto treatment with ganirelix (0.25 mg, s.c.) and 119 to triptorelin(0.1 mg, s.c.) treatment (treatment ratio 2:1). Treatment withganirelix started on day 6 of stimulation, whereas treatmentwith triptorelin started on menstrual cycle day 21 to 24 ofthe previous cycle (i.e. the midluteal phase). The ganirelixregimen was on average 17 days shorter (9 versus 26 days) comparedto the triptorelin regimen. The median total dose of recombinantFSH (Puregon^®) used was 450 IU less (1350 versus 1800 IU)in the ganirelix protocol. The initial follicular growth wasfaster and, consequently, oestradiol concentrations were higherin the ganirelix group. On the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin(HCG), the mean number of follicles 11 mm was 10.1 and 10.7and the median serum oestradiol concentration was 1090 and 1370pg/ml in the ganirelix and triptorelin groups respectively.Per attempt, 7.9 and 9.6 oocytes (mean) were retrieved in theganirelix and triptorelin groups respectively. The fertilizationrates (64.0% ganirelix and 64.9% triptorelin) and the mean numberof good quality embryos (2.7 and 2.9) were comparable in bothtreatment groups. The implantation rate was identical (22.9%).The ongoing pregnancy rate per attempt was 31.0 and 33.9% inthe ganirelix and triptorelin groups respectively. The ganirelixregimen showed an improved local tolerance in that the percentageof subjects with at least one local skin reaction was 2-foldlower than in the triptorelin group (11.9 versus 24.1%). Takingall data together, it may be concluded that ganirelix offersa new treatment regimen in ovarian stimulation that is short,safe and well-tolerated, optimizing convenience for the patient.     

Timing ovulation for intrauterine insemination with a GnRH antagonist

BACKGROUND: We aimed to assess the efficacy of a GnRH antagonist in intrauterine insemination (IUI) cycles to increase number of mature ovulatory follicles and pregnancy rates. METHODS: Prospective randomized study. Women (18-38 years old) with primary/secondary infertility were included. Eighty-two patients were randomly assigned to controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) consisting of rFSH + GnRH antagonist or rFSH alone. RESULTS: A non-significant increase in the total amount of rFSH was seen in the GnRH antagonist group (707+/-240 IU) with respect to the control group (657+/-194 IU). The number of mature follicles (> or =16 mm) was significantly higher in the GnRH antagonist group than in the control group (2.4+/-1.4 versus 1.7+/-1.2, P<0.05). Pregnancy rates were significantly increased in the group of patients receiving the GnRH antagonist (38%) compared to the control group (14%). The only non-single pregnancy (triplets) occurred in the antagonist group. CONCLUSIONS: In this preliminary study, adding the GnRH antagonist to the COS protocol for IUI cycles significantly increased pregnancy rates. Nevertheless, these results may not be associated directly with the antagonist itself but with the fact that more mature ovulatory follicles are present by the day of the hCG. Finally, the risk for multiple gestations needs to be carefully evaluated.     

A prospective, randomized comparison of two starting doses of recombinant FSH in combination with cetrorelix in women undergoing ovarian stimulation for IVF/ICSI

BACKGROUND: A prospective randomized study was carried out in two centres to compare the number of oocytes retrieved after two different starting doses of recombinant human FSH (rhFSH) (Gonal-F) in women undergoing ovarian stimulation for IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles using the multiple dose regimen of the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist cetrorelix (Cetrotide) to prevent induction of the premature LH surge. METHODS: Sixty women were randomized to receive rhFSH 150 IU ('low'), and 60 women to receive rhFSH 225 IU ('high') as the starting dose for the first 5 days of stimulation. From stimulation day 6 and onwards, including the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) administration, the women received 0.25 mg of cetrorelix as a daily dose. The primary endpoint was the number of oocytes retrieved. RESULTS: The mean number (+/- SD) of oocytes was 9.1 +/- 4.4 and 11.0 +/- 4.6 in the 'low' and 'high' groups respectively (P = 0.024). The mean number of 75 IU ampoules of rhFSH was significantly lower in the 'low' group (23.0 +/- 6.3 versus 30.5 +/- 5.6, P < 0.0001). The ongoing pregnancy rate per started cycle and per embryo transfer were 25.9 and 28.8% versus 25.4 and 26.8% respectively in the 'low' and 'high' rhFSH groups (P = NS). CONCLUSIONS: When using a starting dose of 225 IU rhFSH combined with the multiple dose of 0.25 mg cetrorelix from stimulation day 6, significantly more oocytes were obtained than with a starting dose of 150 IU rhFSH.     

Recombinant versus urinary follicle stimulating hormone for ovarian stimulation in assisted reproduction.

The recent availability of recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (rFSH), with its high level of purity and batch-to-batch consistency has made it an attractive alternative to urinary FSH (uFSH) for ovarian stimulation. Several trials have compared the two preparations, but none had sufficient power to detect a clinically meaningful difference in pregnancy rates. The purpose of this study was to determine the clinical pregnancy rates per started cycle by pooling data from randomized trials which compared the use of rFSH and uFSH in treatment cycles using in-vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). A thorough search of the literature identified 12 trials which met the inclusion criteria. In four trials, both IVF and ICSI were performed, in seven trials only IVF was performed and in one trial only ICSI was performed. Data were extracted and pooled using the principles of meta-analysis. There was no significant heterogeneity of treatment effect across the trials. The common odds ratio and the risk difference (and their 95% confidence intervals), obtained by pooling the data using a fixed effects model, were 1.20 (1.02-1.42) and 3.7% (0.5-6.9%) respectively, in favour of rFSH. The pregnancy rate with the alpha preparation of rFSH was statistically significantly higher than with uFSH in IVF cycles. The overall conclusion from this meta-analysis is that the use of rFSH in assisted reproduction is preferred over uFSH.     

GnRH agonist versus GnRH antagonist in oocyte donation cycles: a prospective randomized study

BACKGROUND: The specific role of LH in folliculogenesis and oocyte maturation is unclear. GnRH antagonists, when administered in the late follicular phase, induce a sharp decrease in serum LH which may be detrimental for IVF outcome. This study was performed to evaluate whether the replacement of GnRH agonist (triptorelin) by a GnRH antagonist (ganirelix; NV Organon) in oocyte donation cycles has any impact on pregnancy and implantation rates. METHODS: A total of 148 donor IVF cycles was randomly assigned to use either a GnRH antagonist daily administered from the 8th day of stimulation (group I) or a GnRH agonist long protocol (group II) for the ovarian stimulation of their donors. The primary endpoints were the pregnancy and the implantation rates. RESULTS: The clinical pregnancy rate per transfer (39.72%, 29/73 versus 41.33%, 31/75) based on transvaginal scan findings at 7 weeks of gestation, the implantation rate (23.9 versus 25.4%) and the first trimester abortion rate (10.34 versus 12.90%) were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSION: In oocyte donation cycles the replacement of GnRH agonist by a GnRH antagonist appears to have no impact on the pregnancy and implantation rates when its administration starts on day 8 of stimulation.     

A double-blind, randomized, dose-finding study to assess the efficacy of the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist ganirelix (Org 37462) to prevent premature luteinizing hormone surges in women undergoing ovarian stimulation with recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (Puregon). The ganirelix dose-finding study group

A multicentre, double-blind, randomized dose-finding study of Org 37462 (ganirelix) was conducted in 333 women undergoing ovarian stimulation with recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (rFSH; Puregon) to establish the minimal effective dose preventing premature luteinizing hormone (LH) surges during ovarian stimulation. For ovarian stimulation, rFSH was given in a fixed daily dose of 150 IU for 5 days from days 2 to 6 of the menstrual cycle. From cycle day 7 onward, up to and including the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG), Org 37462 (dosages 0.0625, 0.125, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 mg/0.5 ml) was administered once daily by s.c. injection, and the rFSH dose was adjusted depending on ovarian response. The lowest (0.0625 mg) and highest (2.0 mg) dose groups were terminated prematurely on the advice of an external independent advisory committee. Serum Org 37462 concentrations increased in a linear dose-proportional manner, whereas serum LH and increases of oestradiol fell with increasing Org 37462 dose. During Org 37462 treatment, serum LH concentrations > or =10 IU/l were observed in the lowest dose groups with incidences of 16% (0.0625 mg), 9% (0.125 mg) and 1.4 % (0.25 mg). On the day of HCG, the number of follicles > or =11, > or =15 and > or =17 mm were similar in the six dose groups, whereas serum oestradiol concentrations were highest in the 0.0625 mg group (1475 pg/ml) and lowest in the 2 mg group (430 pg/ml). The median daily dose of rFSH was between 150 and 183 IU and the overall median duration of Org 37462 treatment was approximately 5 days in the six treatment groups. Overall, Org 37462 treatment appeared to be safe and well tolerated. The mean number of recovered oocytes and good-quality embryos was similar in all dose groups and ranged from 8.6 to 10.0 and 2.5 to 3.8, respectively. The mean number of replaced embryos in the different dose groups ranged from 2.3 to 2.7. The implantation rate was highest in the 0.25 mg group (21.9%) and lowest in the 2 mg group (1.5%). The early miscarriage rates (first 6 weeks after embryo transfer) were 11.9 and 13% in the 1 and 2 mg group respectively, whereas in the other dose groups this incidence was zero (0.0625%) up to a maximum of 3.7% (0.5 mg group). The vital pregnancy rate (with heart activity) at 5-6 weeks after embryo transfer was highest in the 0.25 mg group, i.e. 36.8 % per attempt and 40.3 % per transfer, and resulted in an ongoing pregnancy rate 12-16 weeks after embryo transfer of 33.8% per attempt and 37.1% per transfer. In conclusion, a daily dose of 0.25 mg Org 37462 prevented LH surges during ovarian stimulation and resulted in a good clinical outcome.