阴式子宫切除加阴道前后壁修补术治疗子宫脱垂20例临床分析

目的探讨阴式子宫切除联合阴道前后壁修补术治疗子宫脱垂的效果。方法对2011-01-2013-06间20例宫脱垂合并阴道前后壁膨出患者行阴式子宫切除联合阴道前后壁修补术。结果平均手术时间(78±17)min,平均术中失血量(77±23)mL,术后住院时间(8.2±1.0)d。20例患者术后症状全部消失,无并发症发生。结论阴式子宫切除联合阴道前后壁修补术是治疗子宫脱垂的安全、有效手段。     

改良式阴道前后壁修补治疗老年性子宫、阴道脱出57例临床分析

随着国家计划生育政策的实施及新法接生的推行，目前临康上子宫脱垂的病人已大为减少。但老年性子宫脱垂加阴道前后壁晦出件膀耽膨出的病人仍较多见。严重影响老年妇女的生活质量。由干老年妇女全身性并发症多，不能接受进腹及高难度阴道手术。本院于1990年开碚应用改良式阴道前后壁修补术治疗老年性子宫脱垂。并对57例病人进行术后追访，收到满意疗效，治愈率达98．25％。手术简单，病人容易接受，值得在临康推广应用。     

阴道旁修补联合自体组织反桥式修补术治疗阴道前壁膨出探讨

目的比较阴道旁修补联合自体组织＂反桥＂式修复术与传统阴道前壁修补术治疗阴道前壁膨出的临床效果。方法回顾性分析阴道前壁膨出患者33例,12例行传统阴道前壁修补术（对照组）,21例行阴道旁修补术联合自体组织＂反桥＂式修复术（观察组）,对两组术中出血量、手术时间、手术并发症、术后效果进行评价。结果观察组手术时间（43.1±2.3）m in,术中出血量（70.2±18.3）ml,术后无排尿困难,无手术并发症;对照组手术时间（42.2±2.6）min,术中出血量（46.3±12.3）ml,发生膀胱损伤1例,阴道前壁坏死2例,两组手术时间无统计学意义（P〉0.05）,手术并发症和术中出血量均有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。术后随防1年,观察组主观治愈率100%,客观治愈率95.2%;对照组主观治愈率75.0%,客观治愈率66.7%,组间比较均有统计学差异（P〈0.05）。结论阴道旁修补联合自体组织反桥式修复术简单易行,既恢复了解剖学结构,又体现了自体移植的优势,效果肯定。     

阴式子宫全切除联合阴道前后壁修补术治疗Ⅲ度子宫脱垂伴阴道前后壁膨出效果分析

目的分析阴式子宫全切除联合阴道前后壁修补术治疗Ⅲ度子宫脱垂伴阴道前后壁膨出的效果。方法选取2016-12-2018-12间在镇平县第二人民医院接受阴式子宫全切除联合阴道前后壁修补术的54例Ⅲ度子宫脱垂伴阴道前后壁膨出患者,对其手术情况、治疗效果,以及术后随访1 a期间的复发率进行分析。结果本组手术时间54~86 min,平均74.12 min。术中出血量340~420 mL,平均368.28 mL。术后胃肠功能恢复时间24~36 h,平均24.26 h。54例患者中,治愈52例(96.30%),好转2例(3.70%)。随访1 a,无1例复发。结论阴式子宫切除联合阴道前后壁修补术治疗Ⅲ度子宫脱垂伴阴道前后壁膨出,腹壁无切口、疗效确切、复发率低,是一种理想的微创治疗技术。     

阴式全子宫切除联合阴道前后壁修补术治疗子宫脱垂的临床效果

目的 探讨阴式全子宫切除联合阴道前后壁修补术治疗子宫脱垂的临床效果。方法 选择2020年5月至2023年6月收治的子宫脱垂患者,依照纳入排除标准筛选82例进行研究,根据治疗方式不同分为两组,采用腹式全子宫切除术治疗纳入对照组,采用阴式全子宫切除治疗纳入观察组,两组均联合阴道前后壁修补术治疗,对两组临床治疗效果及围术期指标进行比较。结果 观察组围术期指标较对照组更优（P<0.05）;观察组术后并发症发生率较对照组低（P<0.05）;术前两组患者盆底障碍评分无明显差异（P>0.05）,术后观察组盆底障碍评分较对照组低（P<0.05）。结论 阴式全子宫切除联合阴道前后壁修补术治疗子宫脱垂效果满意,可有效降低患者围术期指标,降低术后并发症发生,改善盆底功能。     

腹腔镜阴道前后壁补片治疗女性盆腔脏器脱垂的疗效分析

目的 比较腹腔镜下阴道前后壁补片与开放性阴道前壁修补术治疗盆腔脏器脱垂的长期效果.方法 中山大学附属第三医院泌尿外科7年来共47例有症状的盆腔脏器脱垂患者被纳入研究.所有患者均存在阴道前壁膨出,膀胱脱垂和不同程度的尿路感染.另外,34例有阴道后壁膨出,8例子宫脱垂,14例合并压力性尿失禁.病人被随机分成两组.第1组病人行腹腔镜阴道前后壁补片术,腹腔镜下分离阴道前、后壁直至接近阴道外口.分别在阴道前、后壁置入1块100%聚脂的网状补片,远端与提肛肌固定,近端固定于骶岬,将盆腔脏器复位并固定.对存在压力性尿失禁患者实施了colposuspension手术.第2组病人采取Juma的阴道前壁修补术,所有病人修补阴道前壁,矫正膀胱脱垂并悬吊膀胱颈;5例行经阴道子宫切除术,17例修复直肠脱垂.结果 第1、2组病例的平均住院时间分别为5 d(3～7 d),8 d(3～11 d).总随访时间平均为48个月(13～83个月).所有行腹腔镜下阴道前后壁补片术的病例和22例(92%)阴道前壁修补术的病例术后阴道均获得良好的支持,没有出现膀胱脱垂、阴道后疝或直肠脱垂.第2组有2例(8%)患者阴道后疝复发.第1组23例(100%)患者和第2组22例(92%)术后没有出现压力性尿失禁.结论 腹腔镜技术应用于盆腔脏器脱垂的修复疗效满意,随访4年的调查显示此术式不仅具备开放手术治疗效果,还具有腹腔镜手术创伤小、并发症少的特点,病人满意度高.     

改良式阴道前后壁修补治疗老年性子宫、阴道脱出57例临床分析

随着国家计划生育政策的实施及新法接生的推行,目前临床上子宫脱垂的病人已大为减少。但老年性子宫脱垂加阴道前后壁膨出伴膀胱膨出的病人仍较多见。严重影响老年妇女的生活质量。由于老年妇女全身性并发症多,不能接受进腹及高难度阴道手术。本院于1990年开始应用改良式阴道前后壁修补术治疗老年性子宫脱垂。并对57例病人进行术后追访,收到满意疗效,治愈率达98.25％。手术简单,病人容易接受。值得在临床推广应用。     

阴道前后壁修补术联合阴式子宫全切术治疗中重度子宫脱垂的疗效

目的探究阴道前后壁修补术联合阴式子宫全切术治疗中重度子宫脱垂的疗效及其对性功能的影响。 方法选择芜湖市第五人民医院妇产科自2014年8月至2018年8月收治的中重度子宫脱垂患者60例,随机分为观察组与对照组,每组各30例。观察组行阴式全子宫切除术加阴道前后壁修补术治疗,对照组行单纯阴道前后壁修补术治疗,对比2组围手术期临床指标、术后并发症发生率及复发情况,采用盆腔器官脱垂/尿失禁性功能问卷（PISQ-12）对比2组术前、术后随访6个月的性功能变化情况。 结果观察组平均手术时间、肛门排气时间、住院天数明显短于对照组,观察组术中出血量少于对照组,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）;观察组术后并发症发生率与对照组差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）;观察组的治愈率为90.00%,好转率为10.00%,高于对照组的80.00%、3.33%,观察组无复发者,对照组复发率为16.67%,差异均有统计学意义（P<0.05）;术后随访6个月后观察组PISQ-12评分为（35.12±3.37）分,低于对照组（38.83±5.62）分,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。 结论阴式全子宫切除术联合阴道前后壁修补术治疗中重度子宫脱垂的临床效果较理想,与单纯阴式子宫切除术相比可显著缩短手术时间较短,减少术中出血,提高手术疗效,降低术后复发率,但在改善术后性功能方面并不具有优势。     

腹壁疝补片修补术后补片感染14例分析

目的：探讨疝修补术后补片感染的原因、预防及治疗方法。方法回顾性分析1997年12月至2013年12月我院收治的14例使用补片修补腹壁疝术后补片感染的临床资料。其中腹股沟疝平片修补1例,腹股沟疝腹膜前间隙修补11例,切口疝1例,使用巴德Composix补片开放式腹腔内补片修补;造口疝1例,腹壁肌肉前置入补片修补。根据感染程度、材料不同采用相应的治疗方法,4例去除补片,10例开放换药。结果全组患者均治愈出院,无围手术期死亡。手术过程中无大出血和膀胱损伤。随访时间8～64个月,1例切口疝术后复发。结论产生补片感染的原因很多,预防感染最为重要。一旦发生补片感染,治疗方法应个体化,有效引流及合理运用抗生素可解决多数聚丙烯（PPM）补片感染,唯膨体聚四氟乙烯（ePTFE）补片需完全去除。     

阴式全子宫切除术+阴道前后壁修补术对子宫脱垂患者应激反应的影响

目的 探讨阴式全子宫切除术+阴道前后壁修补术对子宫脱垂患者应激反应的影响.方法 回顾性分析长葛市中心医院2019-09—2021-03行全子宫切除术+阴道前后壁修补术治疗的31例子宫脱垂患者的临床资料,记录手术时间、术中出血量和住院时间.分析手术对WBC计数以及皮质醇(Cor)、C反应蛋白(CRP)、白介素-6(IL-...     

聚丙烯网片盆腔悬吊术治疗盆腔脏器脱垂79例

目的探讨聚丙烯网片盆腔悬吊术治疗女性盆腔脏器脱垂(pelvic organ prolapse,POP)的疗效。方法回顾性分析2003年12月～2008年12月我院应用国产穿刺锥行网片介入手术治疗79例POP的临床资料,评估该术式的治愈率、并发症、复发率和新盆腔症状。POP分级采用盆腔器官脱垂量化系统(POP-Q)评定,泌尿生殖道症状问询采用盆底功能障碍疾病相关问卷(PFDI-20)。结果术后1年POP治愈68例(86.1%),好转8例(10.1%)。术后3个月内POP复发1例(1.3%),再次手术随访2年末复发;术后1年POP复发3例(3.8%)。排尿障碍术后3个月内发生2例(2.5%),术后1年发生1例(1.3%)。网片腐蚀术后3个月内发生5例(6.3%),术后1年发生3例(3.8%)。术后1年出现性生活不适或疼痛4例(5.1%),术后出现膀胱过度活动症(overactive bladder,OAB)5例(6.3%),与网片相关的疼痛1例(1.3%)。结论聚丙烯网片POP腔悬吊术治疗盆疗效满意,复发率低,最多见的并发症是网片腐蚀,新出现的问题是OAB。     

Pelvic organ support and prevalence by Pelvic Organ Prolapse-Quantification (POP-Q) in Korean women

PURPOSE: We evaluated pelvic organ support and the prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse in Korean women using the Pelvic Organ Prolapse-Quantification system as the assessment tool. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study population consisted of 713 women 18 to 72 years old who were seen for annual Papanicolaou testing and pelvic examinations. Pregnant patients and patients who had delivered within the previous 6 weeks were not recruited. All pelvic examinations were performed by a single examiner. The patient was examined in the dorsal lithotomy position in a pelvic examination chair positioned at a 15-degree angle. All 9 measurements except total vaginal length were taken with the patient performing the maximal Valsalva maneuver. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 41.6 years (range 18 to 72), mean weight +/- SD was 55.8 +/- 7.4 kg (range 40 to 83), mean height was 158.7 +/- 5.4 cm (range 138 to 177), mean body mass index was 22.3 +/- 8.1 kg/m2 (range 15.7 to 32) and median parity was 2 (range 0 to 6). Mean scores for the position of the cervix and posterior fornix, and total vaginal length were -5.0, -6.6 and 7.0 cm, respectively. In the 713 women with a uterus the incidence of anterior vaginal, uterine and posterior vaginal prolapse was 27.6%, 2.0% and 25.4%, respectively. The overall distribution of pelvic organ prolapse quantification system stage was stages 0 to 4 in 68.3%, 19.9%, 11.2%, 0.6% and 0.0% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Vaginal size in Korean women differs from that in Western women. The prevalence of any degree of prolapse was approximately 31.7%. Korean women were at relatively higher risk for anterior and posterior vaginal prolapse than for uterine prolapse.     

Robot-assisted Sacrocolpopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Comparative Studies

Context

Surgery represents the mainstay of treatment for pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Among different surgical procedures, abdominal sacrocolpopexy (SC) is the gold standard for apical or multicompartmental POP. Research has recently focused on the role of robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy (RASC).

Objective

To conduct a systematic review on the outcomes of RASC.

Evidence acquisition

PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases as well as ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for English-language literature on RASC. A total of 509 articles were screened; 50 (10%) were selected, and 27 (5%) were included. Studies were evaluated per the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system and the European Association of Urology guidelines.

Evidence synthesis

Overall, data on 1488 RASCs were collected from 27 studies, published from 2006 to 2013. Objective and subjective cures ranged from 84% to 100% and from 92% to 95%, respectively. Conversion rate to open surgery was <1% (range: 0–5%). Intraoperative, severe postoperative complications, and mesh erosion rates were 3% (range: 0–19%), 2% (range: 0–8%), and 2% (range: 0–8%), respectively. Surgical-related outcomes have improved with increased experience, with an estimated learning curve of about 10–20 procedures. Laparoscopic SC is less costly than RASC, although the latter has lower costs than abdominal SC.

Conclusions

RASC is a safe and feasible procedure for POP; it allows the execution of complex surgical steps via minimally invasive surgery without medium- and long-term anatomic detriments. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Patient summary

We looked at the outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy for prolapse. We found that the use of robotic technology is safe and effective for the treatment of prolapse in women.     

改良Kugel补片前入路腹膜前修补腹股沟疝(附35例报告)

目的 探讨改良Kugel补片前入路腹膜前修补腹股沟疝效果. 方法 2004年5月～2006年6月,应用改良Kugel补片修补腹股沟疝35例.手术要点：疝囊高位游离后将其翻转还纳腹腔,围绕内环口游离一个10 cm×10 cm的腹膜前间隙,将改良Kugel补片置于游离的腹膜前间隙,用2-0的Prolene线将固定带的上瓣固定于联合腱,下瓣固定在腹股沟韧带反折处. 结果 手术时间（47±10）min,术后均未使用止痛剂,术后住院天数（6±4）d.全组伤口一期愈合,无伤口浆液肿及感染发生.35例术后随访1～25个月,平均13.2月,其中26例随访＞12个月,无复发. 结论 改良Kugel补片修补腹股沟疝具有伤口疼痛和肿胀轻的优点, 特别适合Ⅲ、Ⅳ型疝修补.     

Sexual Function in Women with and without Urinary Incontinence and/or Pelvic Organ Prolapse

The sexual function of women with and without urinary incontinence and/or pelvic organ prolapse (UI/POP) was compared using a condition-specific validated questionnaire, the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ). Eighty-three women with UI/POP and 56 without agreed to participate. PISQ scores were significantly lower among women with UI/POP than in those without (P = 0.003). No differences in the stages of sexual excitement were noted between groups. The frequency of intercourse was less with UI/POP than without (P = 0.04). Women with UI/POP restricted sexual activity for fear of losing urine more frequently than did those without (P= 0.005). No differences were reported in patients’ or partners’ sexual satisfaction. This study found that women with UI/POP have poorer sexual functioning than those without, as measured by the PISQ, and report less frequent sexual activity. In addition, women with UI/POP are more likely to restrict sexual activity for fear of incontinence, although they report similar levels of satisfaction with their sexual relationships as do women without UI/POP.     

阴道前壁“斜拉桥”式修补术与传统阴道前壁修补术治疗阴道前壁膨出的临床效果比较

目的比较阴道前壁“斜拉桥”式修补术与传统阴道前壁修补术治疗阴道前壁膨出的临床效果。方法2006年1月～2009年10月对30例（斜拉桥式组）阴道前壁膨出施行阴道前壁“斜拉桥”式修补术（将阴道前壁两侧膀胱筋膜分别缝于对侧耻骨降支骨膜上）,与2002年1月-2006年1月35例（传统术式组）阴道前壁膨出行传统阴道前壁修补术（将膀胱筋膜荷包缝合以使膨出的膀胱回缩）进行比较,比较2组手术时间、术中出血量、手术并发症、术后复发率、术后阴道深度、术后性生活满意情况及保持率。结果2组手术时间、术中出血量、术后1周内新发尿潴留无统计学差异（P〉0．05）。术后12个月阴道深度传统术式组为（5．6±1．1）cm显著短于斜拉桥式组（7．5±0．6）em（t=-8．440,P=0．000）。传统术式组术后2年复发率20．0％（7／35）,显著高于斜拉桥式组0（P=0．010）。术后12个月内性生活保持率传统术式组5．7％（2／35）与斜拉桥式组13．3％（4／30）无统计学差异（,=0．395,P=0．530）。结论阴道前壁“斜拉桥”式修补术不用额外材料而将脱垂的组织交叉固定在坚韧有力的骨膜上,借鉴了斜拉桥的构造原理,既加固盆底又经济,且骨膜标志易辨识,手术简单易操作,增加了安全性,临床效果优于传统修复术。     

An ambispective observational study in the safety and efficacy of posterior colporrhaphy with composite Vicryl-Prolene mesh

There is increasing evidence to show that the use of surgical meshes reduces recurrence rates of hernia repair and anterior vaginal wall prolapse. The aim of this study was to determine the safety and efficacy of posterior colporrhaphy with mesh in patients with posterior vaginal prolapse. An ambispective observational study involving 90 patients was conducted with retrospective chart review and prospective subjective and objective assessments at the end of a 1-year study period. Apart from 2 of 90 (2.2%) minor hematoma incidents, there was no other major perioperative morbidity. Prevalence of common prolapse complaints of vaginal lump sensation, constipation, defecation difficulty and dyspareunia all improved significantly postoperatively (p<0.001). Surgical correction was achieved in 27 of 31 (83.9%) at 6 months and beyond. There was no mesh infection but minor vaginal mesh protrusion was found in 7 of 90 (7.8%) patients at 6–12 weeks and 4 of 31 (12.9%) patients at 6 months and beyond. All these were treated easily with trimming without the need of mesh removal. We conclude that posterior colporrhaphy with mesh is effective in treating posterior vaginal prolapse in short term.Editorial Comment: This study reflects the authors experience in using a Vicryl-Prolene mesh, Vypro II, for treatment of rectocele in 90 patients. No serious operative or postoperative complications occurred. The most common minor complication was vaginal mesh protrusion, with a 9 of the 90 being found with this problem; all but 1 of these were resolved with a simple clinic procedure. In a group of 31 patients followed for at least 6 months, the authors note a 16% recurrence rate of rectocele. In a questionnaire given after the surgeries, comparing pre-op and post-op symptoms, 63–79% of the respondents felt improved, depending on the symptom. The authors feel that vaginal colporrhaphy with Vicryl-Prolene mesh will prove to be more efficacious than the existing popular approaches, including site-specific defect repair. Clearly, randomized controlled studies with longer follow-up comparing this method with other colporrhaphy techniques will be needed to validate this assumptionAn erratum to this article can be found at