Aversion instead of preference learning indicated by nicotine place conditioning in rats

Although nicotine is a drug of abuse for millions of smokers, it has been difficult to demonstrate clearly the motivational properties of nicotine with rats using the conditioned place preference (CPP) paradigm. The first experiment attempted to replicate CPPs reported by other researchers using nicotine doses of 0.4, 0.8, and 1.2 mg/kg. There was a trend for all three doses to produce aversions, but it was significant only for the 0.8 mg/kg dose. Exposures to the CS alone extinguished aversions, but a priming dose (0.2 mg/kg) of nicotine given after extinction produced aversions only in animals exposed to 1.2 mg/kg. Experiment 2 tested whether preexposure to morphine or nicotine would sensitize animals to nicotine's reinforcing effects. In this experiment, rats were exposed to either six nicotine (0.6 mg/kg) or morphine (1.0 mg/kg) dosings prior to preference conditioning. Neither preferences nor aversions were observed in any group following subsequent conditioning with 0.6 mg/kg nicotine. The results suggest that previous observations of preference effects may have been due to specific procedural factors or may have depended on negative reinforcement due to stress reduction.     

Neuroleptics block the positive reinforcing effects of amphetamine but not of morphine as measured by place conditioning

The role of dopamine brain systems in mediating the rewarding effects of opiates and stimulants was investigated using the conditioned place preference paradigm. The effects of the neuroleptics alpha-flupentixol (0.8 mg/kg, IP) and haloperidol (1.0 mg/kg, IP) were tested against the place preferences produced by morphine sulphate (1.0 and 5.0 mg/kg, SC), d-amphetamine sulphate (1.0 mg/kg, IP) and cocaine hydrochloride (5.0 mg/kg, IP). Amphetamine place preference was successfully blocked but neuroleptic pretreatment had no effect on the place preferences produced by cocaine and morphine, alpha-Flupentixol alone produced no place conditioning. These results support the hypothesis of dopamine involvement in amphetamine reward. However, morphine reward, as measured by the conditioned place preference paradigm, appears not to be critically dependent on brain dopamine systems.     

Attenuation by haloperidol of place preference conditioning using food reinforcement

The place preference conditioning paradigm was used to examine the reinforcing properties of food in hungry rats. Availability of food in one of two distinctive environments increased the amount of time they spent in the environment associated with food in a test when the animals were no longer food deprived and neither environment contained food. Pretreatment with haloperidol (0.1 or 0.2 mg/kg) during the conditioning phase blocked the establishment of place preference even though the animals consumed the food in the drugged state. The results are interpreted as demonstrating a role for dopamine-containing neurons in mediating the reinforcing properties of food.     

Aripiprazole blocks reinstatement but not expression of morphine conditioned place preference in rats

Aripiprazole is an atypical antipsychotic drug primarily characterized by partial agonist activity at dopamine (DA) D₂ receptors and serotonin-1A (5-hydroxytryptamine, 5-HT_1A) receptors and minimal side effects. Based on its pharmacological profile, including stabilization of mesocorticolimbic DA activity (a pathway implicated in drug addiction), we investigated the effects of aripiprazole on relapse to morphine seeking in rats. In experiment 1, rats underwent morphine-induced conditioned place preference (CPP) training with alternate injections of morphine (5 mg/kg, s.c.) and saline (1 ml/kg, s.c.) for 8 consecutive days. To examine the effect of aripiprazole on the expression of morphine-induced CPP, rats received aripiprazole (0, 0.03, 0.1, and 0.3 mg/kg, i.p.) 30 min before testing for the expression of CPP. In experiment 2, rats underwent the same CPP training as in experiment 1 and subsequent extinction training. To examine the effect of aripiprazole on reinstatement of morphine-induced CPP, rats received aripiprazole 30 min before testing for reinstatement of CPP. In experiment 3, to assess the effects of aripiprazole on locomotor activity, aripiprazole was administered 30 min before testing for locomotor activity. Aripiprazole significantly decreased the reinstatement of CPP induced by a priming injection of morphine but had no effect on the expression of morphine-induced CPP or locomotor activity. The D₂ and 5-HT_1A partial agonist and 5-HT_2A antagonist properties of aripiprazole likely account for the blockade of relapse to drug seeking. These findings suggest that aripiprazole may have therapeutic value for reducing craving and preventing relapse to drug seeking.     

Role of repeated exposure to morphine in determining its affective properties: place and taste conditioning studies in rats

Male Sprague Dawley rats were injected daily with saline (morphine naive rats) or 20 mg/kg morphine (morphine experienced rats), starting at least 12 days before training. Subsequent place and taste conditioning indicated that 2.5 mg/kg morphine caused a significant increase in the amount of time spent on the least preferred side by morphine experienced but not by morphine naive rats; furthermore, saccharin consumption was markedly decreased and slightly increased by 10–20 mg/kg morphine in naive and experienced rats, respectively. It was concluded that morphine experience enhances the reinforcing efficacy of morphine and broadens the conditions under which the drug is reinforcing; thus it possibly increases morphine abuse potential.     

Dose-dependent aversive and rewarding effects of amphetamine as revealed by a new place conditioning apparatus

Amphetamine-induced place conditioning was evaluated in mice using a newly designed apparatus. It was demonstrated that this apparatus provides a neutral set of cues devoid of rewarding or aversive properties and can reveal place preference or aversion after pairings with drugs (amphetamine and morphine for preference and naloxone for aversion) known to produce such effects. Moreover, repeated pairings of environmental cues with either 2 or 3 mg/kgd-amphetamine resulted in significant conditioned place preference on a drug free test, whilst repeated pairings with a lower dose of the drug (1 mg/kg) resulted in significant conditioned place aversion. Finally, a small number of mice showed opposite responses in comparison with group means at low as well as at high doses of amphetamine. These results suggest that amphetamine may promote conditioned place preference or avoidance depending on dosage and individual susceptibility.     

Conditioned place preference: An evaluation of morphine's positive reinforcing properties

The place-preference paradigm was evaluated as a measure of morphine's positive reinforcing properties. Previous place-preference studies obtained a morphine place preference of 26%–63%. In order to examine whether differences in procedure may account for this scatter, the present experiment investigated whether there is any difference in the absolute magnitude of preference when animals are conditioned on their non-preferred side of the box or when animals are randomly assigned to the side of conditioning. Furthermore, the number of conditioning days was extended with 3 intervening test days, and drug doses were doubled following each test day. The results showed no significant difference between conditioning animals on their non-preferred side or randomly assigning them to the side of conditioning. However, by extending the number of conditioning days, as well as by following the drug regimen used, the animals showed a greater magnitude of preference than that observed in previous studies. The implications of these findings for the usage of this paradigm as a measure of morphine's positive reinforcing properties are discussed.     

Naloxone blockade of amphetamine place preference conditioning

Amphetamine and naloxone were examined in place conditioning, in order to study possible interactions between endogenous opioids and catecholamines in reinforcement. After initial preferences were determined, animals were conditioned with amphetamine alone (1.0 mg/kg SC), naloxone alone (0.02, 0.2 or 2.0 mg/kg SC) or combinations of amphetamine plus naloxone. A reliable, long-lasting preference for the compartment associated with amphetamine was observed, reflecting the reinforcing properties of this drug. No preference or aversion was observed in animals that received saline in both compartments. Naloxone (0.02, 0.2 and 2.0 mg/kg) produced a dose-dependent place aversion; while the lowest dose had effects similar to saline, the higher doses produced significant place aversions. Naloxone, at all three doses examined, prevented the ability of amphetamine to produce a place preference. Thus, the lowest dose of naloxone, having no effects alone in place conditioning was still able to block the reinforcing effects of amphetamine. These results suggest that the reinforcing effects of amphetamine are dependent on activation of opiate receptors, and provide further evidence that interactions between endogenous opioids and catecholamines may be important in reinforcement.A preliminary report of this research was presented at the 11th Annual Society for Neuroscience Meeting in Dallas, Texas (Trujillo et al. 1985)     

Evidence of place conditioning after chronic intrathecal morphine in rats

The acute administration of either systemic or intrathecal morphine produced an antinociceptive reaction on the tail flick test; only systemic morphine produced a sedative effect on motor activity. Rats receiving chronic intrathecal injections were hyperactive relative to saline injected control subjects. After a series of four injections, a place preference was induced by both routes of administration: rats who had previously received morphine either by subcutaneous or intrathecal injection spent significantly more time in the context in which the drug had been given, relative to rats who were comparably injected with saline. These data suggest that chronic intrathecal morphine in rats may elicit a discriminable cue, either through direct pharmacological stimulation of supraspinal sites, or, indirectly, as a consequence of spinal opiate action.     

Effects of test conditions on the outcome of place conditioning with morphine and naltrexone in mice

 Drug administration during test trials can increase the expression of place conditioning, offering an opportunity to determine the specificity of this enhanced response. Prior to training, Swiss-Webster mice spent similar durations in each of the distinctive compartments of a two-compartment box during three 900-s tests. During a 4-day conditioning period, daily injections of morphine (5–20 mg/kg, SC) or vehicle were differentially paired with one of two compartments of the box using an unbiased place conditioning procedure. Post-conditioning tests were conducted 2 and 3 days after the last conditioning day. Mice pre-treated during post-conditioning tests with vehicle did not show significant preference for the morphine-paired compartment when conditioned with morphine. Pretreatment with morphine (2.5–30 mg/kg, SC) led to a dose-dependent increase in time spent in the morphine-paired compartment. Post-conditioning tests in other groups of mice were conducted with heroin (0.1–3 mg/kg), fentanyl (0.01–0.3 mg/kg), cocaine (10–30 mg/kg) and pentobarbital (10–30 mg/kg), and results suggested that none of the tested drugs facilitated the expression of the morphine-conditioned place preference. In another experiment, naltrexone (0.1–10 mg/kg, SC) was administered as the conditioning drug. When tested with naltrexone (0.1–10 mg/kg), there was a dose-dependent avoidance of the naltrexone-paired compartment. Overall, the present data indicated that: (1) failure to exhibit place preference or place aversion when tested in a drug-free state does not imply the failure of conditioning procedure; and (2) effects of the morphine cue reinstatement during the post-conditioning tests appeared to be related to the unique pharmacological profile of the morphine stimulus. Received: 28 November 1997 / Final version: 23 July 1998     

Nicotine-induced place preferences following prior nicotine exposure in rats

The motivational properties of morphine and nicotine were investigated in an automated conditioned place preference (CPP) procedure using a two-compartment apparatus. The accuracy of the photocell recording system was assessed by correlation with direct observation. In a counterbalanced conditioning design, graded doses of morphine (0.1–3.2 mg/kg SC) produced dose-related CPP. Under similar conditions, a dose of nicotine (0.6 mg/kg SC) previously reported to produce CPP failed to show an effect. Increasing the number of conditioning trials from 4 to 12 did not facilitate CPP with nicotine. After pretreatment with nicotine (0.4 mg/kg SC) daily for 7 days prior to conditioning, nicotine (0.4–0.8 mg/kg) produced increasing magnitudes of CPP. Locomotor activity was assessed during both conditioning and extinction tests. During conditioning, nicotine but not morphine decreased activity in the first conditioning trial, but by the fourth trial, marked stimulation was apparent following administration of either drug. Activity in the drug-paired compartment was not increased during tests for CPP carried out in the undrugged state following 4 conditioning trials with either morphine or nicotine, but there was evidence for conditioned hyperactivity after 12 conditioning trials with nicotine. The results suggest that motivational properties of nicotine can be detected in counterbalanced CPP procedures, but only in subjects with a history of nicotine exposure. The CPP produced by morphine or nicotine does not appear to be an artefact associated with conditioned changes in locomotor activity.     

An animal model of anhedonia: attenuation of sucrose consumption and place preference conditioning by chronic unpredictable mild stress

Chronic exposure to very mild unpredictable stress has previously been found to depress the consumption of, and preference for, highly palatable sweet solutions. The present study used the place conditioning procedure to investigate whether these effects result from a decreased sensitivity to reward. Rats were subjected to chronic mild unpredictable stress for a total of 4 weeks. During weeks 3 and 4, they received four training trials, in which rewards were presented in a distinctive environment, and four further non-rewarded trials in a different environment. The rewards used in different experiments were food pellets, dilute (0.7%) and concentrated (34%) sucrose solutions, anddl-amphetamine sulphate (0.5 and 1.0 mg/kg). In all experiments, non-stressed animals showed an increase in preference for the environment associated with reward; in stressed animals, these effects were abolished or greatly attenuated. Chronic unpredictable mild stress, which may be comparable in intensity to the difficulties people encounter in their daily lives, appears to cause a generalized decrease in sensitivity to rewards.     

Isolation rearing enhances the locomotor stimulant properties of intra-perifornical sulpiride, but impairs the acquisition of a conditioned place preference

Previous data indicated that infusions of the D₂/D₃ dopamine receptor antagonist sulpiride within the perifornical region of the lateral hypothalamus may engage neural circuitry relevant to activation of the mesoaccumbens dopamine projection. The present work examined this proposition further. Experiment 1 examined the ability of intra-perifornical sulpiride to induce a conditioned place preference, using an unbiased conditioning procedure. Thus, bilateral guide cannulae were implanted to gain access to the perifornical region of the lateral hypothalamus. Following recovery, animals were subjected to an initial exposure to the place preference apparatus. The apparatus consisted of three distinctive compartments, the central compartment allowing access to the two outermost compartments. Initial exposure indicated equal preference for each. Then, in alternating sessions, animals received infusions of sulpiride (5, 10 or 20 μg) before being placed in one of the two outermost compartments, and infusions of vehicle before being placed in the alternate compartment. Compartment-drug pairings were counterbalanced across animals. Four drug, and four saline sessions were completed, each being separated by at least 2 full days. On the final test day, animals were allowed free access to compartments, and the time spent in each was compared with that of initial exposure. Results showed that intra-perifornical sulpiride increased activity during drug-conditioning sessions in an incremental fashion, and supported dose-dependently the acquisition of a conditioned place preference. Experiment 2 examined the effects of isolation rearing upon the locomotor stimulant properties of intra-perifornical sulpiride, and the acquisition of a conditioned place preference. Rats were raised from weaning either alone (isolation-reared) or in groups of five (socially-reared controls) until 4 months of age. Consistent with previous reports of the effects of isolation rearing upon psychomotor stimulant responsivity, here isolates were found to be more responsive to the locomotor stimulant properties of intra-perifornical sulpiride, but were less responsive to the ability of intra-perifornical sulpiride to support the acquisition of a conditioned place preference. These data were suggested to provide further support for the proposition that blockade of dopamine receptors of the D₂ family within the perifornical region of the lateral hypothalamus results in the activation of the mesoaccumbens dopamine projection, via the ventral tegmental area. Received: 28 November 1996 / Final version: 3 April 1997     

Allopregnanolone does not influence ethanol-induced conditioned place preference in DBA/2J mice

Rationale The neurosteroid allopregnanolone (ALLOP; 3-hydroxy-5-pregnan-20-one) produces behavioral and discriminative characteristics similar to that of ethanol (EtOH) and can modulate some of the behavioral and electrophysiological effects of EtOH.Objective The present experiments investigated ALLOP modulation of the effects of EtOH in a place conditioning procedure in male DBA/2J mice.Methods In a series of experiments examining different EtOH doses (1, 2 g/kg) and ALLOP administration times, ALLOP (0, 3.2, 10, 17 mg/kg, IP) was administered four times with EtOH prior to placement on a distinctive floor (CS+). On alternate days, vehicle was administered prior to a saline injection paired with the other floor stimulus (CS–). In a separate experiment, finasteride (0, 50, 100 mg/kg, IP), a 5-reductase inhibitor that blocks ALLOP synthesis, was administered prior to both CS+ and CS– trials. In a final experiment, animals were place conditioned to EtOH alone, and ALLOP (0, 3.2, 10, 17 mg/kg, IP) was administered prior to the preference test only.Results During conditioning, ALLOP increased and finasteride decreased EtOH-stimulated activity compared with vehicle pretreatment. Acquisition of 2 g/kg EtOH-induced conditioned place preference was observed in all mice, regardless of treatment with either ALLOP or finasteride. Similarly, ALLOP did not modulate the expression of EtOH-induced place preference. EtOH increased brain ALLOP levels compared with saline; however, ALLOP administration produced dose-dependent elevations in brain ALLOP levels that were not further augmented by EtOH (2 g/kg) administration.Conclusions These findings indicate that ALLOP does not modulate EtOH-induced place conditioning in male DBA/2J mice.     

Blockade of morphine-induced place preference by diazepam in mice

The effects of diazepam on morphine-induced place preference were examined in mice. Pretreatment with diazepam (2 mg/kg i.p.) 30 min prior to morphine injection significantly abolished the morphine (5 mg/kg s.c.)-induced place preference, and this effect of diazepam was antagonized by pretreatment with flumazenil. In addition, pretreatment with diazepam prevented the morphine (5 mg/kg s.c.)-induced increase in dopamine turnover in the limbic forebrain. These results suggest that pretreatment with diazepam may suppress the rewarding effects of morphine.     

Role of withdrawal in reinstatement of morphine-conditioned place preference

Rationale Relapse is a major characteristic of drug addiction and the primary problem in treating drug abuse. Based on the negative reinforcement view of addiction, in which the motivation to take drugs is thought to result from the desire to avoid the aversive effect of drug withdrawal, it has been theorized that withdrawal symptoms play a major role in the maintenance of and relapse to drug taking. However, the role of withdrawal in relapse has not yet been systemically investigated in the reinstatement model. Objectives Using a conditioned place preference (CPP) paradigm, we examined the role of different morphine withdrawal states (spontaneous withdrawal, naloxone-precipitated withdrawal, and conditioned withdrawal) in relapse to drug seeking. Methods Rats alternately received morphine (10 mg/kg, s.c.) and saline for 8 days to acquire the CPP. The morphine CPP disappeared after a 2-week extinction phase of saline-paired training. Rats were then chronically administered morphine to induce physical dependence. The different withdrawal states were induced and their roles in the reinstatement of extinguished CPP were assessed. During conditioned withdrawal, trunk blood samples were taken and the corticosterone level was measured by radioimmunoassay. To examine the role of corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) receptor antagonist on conditioned-withdrawal-induced reinstatement of CPP, different doses of α-helical CRF (0.1 and 1 μg, i.c.v.) were administered 30 min prior to the CPP testing. Results The results show that morphine spontaneous withdrawal and naloxone-precipitated morphine withdrawal were ineffective in reinstating morphine CPP. However, the withdrawal cues significantly elicited the reinstatement of CPP and increased corticosterone level. Moreover, pretreatment with the CRF receptor antagonist α-helical CRF (1 μg, i.c.v.) significantly attenuated the effects of withdrawal cues on reinstatement of CPP and corticosterone levels. Conclusion These findings demonstrate that the cues associated with previous drug withdrawal play a major role in drug relapse and that activation of the CRF receptor is involved in conditioned-withdrawal-induced reinstatement. The present study suggests that CRF receptor antagonists might be of value in the treatment and prevention of relapse to drug seeking after long-term abstinence. Xin Ge and Wen Yue contributed equally to this work.     

Effects of diazepam on conditioned place preference induced by morphine or amphetamine in the rat

RATIONALE: The drug-abuse literature suggests that benzodiazepines may be preferentially abused in conjunction with opioids rather than stimulants. OBJECTIVE: To investigate possible effects of diazepam on the reinforcing effects of morphine and amphetamine. METHODS: The effects of diazepam (0.5, 1 or 2 mg/kg) on the formation and expression of conditioned place preferences (CPP) induced by morphine sulphate (0.3, 0.8, 2 and 8 mg/kg) or D-amphetamine (0.4, 0.8, 2 or 2.5 mg/kg) were studied in an unbiased CPP paradigm. The action of diazepam (1 mg/kg) on conditioned and unconditioned locomotion induced by morphine (2 mg/kg) or amphetamine (2 mg/kg) was assessed. RESULTS: Rats that received conditioning injections of morphine in one environment displayed a preference for this environment. Pre-testing injections of diazepam did not alter the magnitude of this CPP. When diazepam was given with morphine during training, rats displayed a CPP for the environment paired with the two drugs. Injections of amphetamine in one environment also induced a preference for this environment. However, pre-testing injections of diazepam blocked the expression of amphetamine-induced CPP, and co-injections of diazepam blocked the formation of amphetamine CPP. Diazepam itself did not produce a CPP nor did it alter spontaneous place preferences. Diazepam equally blocked both morphine and amphetamine unconditioned and conditioned locomotor hyperactivity. This indicates that its effects on morphine and amphetamine CPP were not due to a differential effect on locomotion. CONCLUSIONS: Diazepam interferes with the reinforcing properties of amphetamines but not of morphine. The reinforcing effects of morphine and amphetamine are pharmacologically dissociable.     

Apparatus bias and place conditioning with ethanol in mice

RATIONALE: Although the distinction between "biased" and "unbiased" is generally recognized as an important methodological issue in place conditioning, previous studies have not adequately addressed the distinction between a biased/unbiased apparatus and a biased/unbiased stimulus assignment procedure. Moreover, a review of the recent literature indicates that many reports (70% of 76 papers published in 2001) fail to provide adequate information about apparatus bias. This issue is important because the mechanisms underlying a drug's effect in the place-conditioning procedure may differ depending on whether the apparatus is biased or unbiased. OBJECTIVES: The present studies were designed to assess the impact of apparatus bias and stimulus assignment procedure on ethanol-induced place conditioning in mice (DBA/2 J). A secondary goal was to compare various dependent variables commonly used to index conditioned place preference. METHODS: Apparatus bias was manipulated by varying the combination of tactile (floor) cues available during preference tests. Experiment 1 used an unbiased apparatus in which the stimulus alternatives were equally preferred during a pre-test as indicated by the group average. Experiment 2 used a biased apparatus in which one of the stimuli was strongly preferred by most mice (mean % time on cue = 67%) during the pre-test. In both studies, the stimulus paired with drug (CS+) was assigned randomly (i.e., an "unbiased" stimulus assignment procedure). Experimental mice received four pairings of CS+ with ethanol (2 g/kg, i.p.) and four pairings of the alternative stimulus (CS-) with saline; control mice received saline on both types of trial. Each experiment concluded with a 60-min choice test. RESULTS: With the unbiased apparatus (experiment 1), significant place conditioning was obtained regardless of whether drug was paired with the subject's initially preferred or non-preferred stimulus. However, with the biased apparatus (experiment 2), place conditioning was apparent only when ethanol was paired with the initially non-preferred cue, and not when it was paired with the initially preferred cue. These conclusions held regardless of which dependent variable was used to index place conditioning, but only if the counterbalancing factor was included in statistical analyses. CONCLUSIONS:These studies indicate that apparatus bias plays a major role in determining whether biased assignment of an ethanol-paired stimulus affects ability to demonstrate conditioned place preference. Ethanol's ability to produce conditioned place preference in an unbiased apparatus, regardless of the direction of the initial cue bias, supports previous studies that interpret such findings as evidence of a primary rewarding drug effect. Moreover, these studies suggest that the asymmetrical outcome observed in the biased apparatus is most likely due to a measurement problem (e.g., ceiling effect) rather than to an interaction between the drug's effect and an unconditioned motivational response (e.g., "anxiety") to the initially non-preferred stimulus. More generally, these findings illustrate the importance of providing clear information on apparatus bias in all place-conditioning studies.     

Diazepam impairs place learning in naive but not in maze-experienced rats in the Morris water maze

Anxiolytic benzodiazepines have been shown to impair place learning in the Morris water maze. However, a clear-cut demonstration of a direct and specific effect on mnemonic processes has not yet been offered. In the present study, the effects of diazepam on place navigation in the Morris water maze were studied in rats. Three conditions were examined: learning, reversal learning and learning after familiarisation of animals with the maze. In view of the anxiolytic and sedative properties of diazepam, appropriate doses of the drug, i.e. those that produced an anxiolytic effect but no major motor impairment, were initially selected in the water-lick conflict and rotarod tests, respectively. Doses of 2.5 and 5 mg/kg PO increased punished drinking in the water-lick conflict test without significantly decreasing rotarod performance. These doses were then used to assess the effects of diazepam on spatial behaviour. Diazepam, at both doses, impaired place learning in behaviourally naive rats. Such an effect appeared to be transient: diazepam-treated rats eventually reached control performance. Moreover, analysis of the probe trial at the end of training revealed adoption of a spatial strategy to locate the submerged platform. Neither reversal learning nor learning after familiarisation was affected. These results do not replicate previous findings in the Morris water maze and provide some evidence that the diazepam-induced place learning deficit may be primarily anxiolytic in nature.     

Triazolam attenuates amphetamine but not morphine conditioned place preferences

In a series of four experiments the benzodiazepine triazolam was tested for reinforcing effects and for effects on reinforcement induced by amphetamine and morphine. Reinforcement was assessed in a conditioned place preference paradigm. Triazolam did not produce reinforcing or aversive effects when administered in doses ranging from 0.0625 to 0.5 mg/kg. Triazolam did attenuate reinforcing effects produced by 0.75 and 1.25 mg/kg amphetamine. No effect of triazolam was observed on morphine-induced reinforcement. These results indicate that the administration of triazolam can affect the brain mechanisms that mediate the reinforcing effects of amphetamine but not morphine.