Opiate delta-2-receptor antagonist naltriben does not alter discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol

The ability of a selective 2-opiate receptor antagonist, naltriben, to modulate ethanol discrimination was investigated in a rat model using a drug discrimination procedure. Rats were trained to discriminate ethanol (1.25 g/kg, IP) from saline on a fixed-ratio schedule, FR10. Once rats had acquired the ethanol-saline discrimination, ethanol dose-response tests were conducted with 15-min pretest injections. Following the characterization of the ethanol dose-response curve, the effect of naltriben on ethanol's discriminative stimulus was assessed by administering naltriben (0. 032-5.6 mg/kg, IP) 15 min before the ethanol administration. In the present study, naltriben did not have any modulatory effect on ethanol discrimination, suggesting that either Delta(2)-opiate receptors are not involved in the formation of ethanol's discriminative stimulus or the antagonism of Delta(2)-opiate receptors is not sufficient to alter ethanol's compound discriminative stimulus.     

Quinidine does not alter antipyrine metabolism

Quinidine has been reported to be a potent inhibitor of a specific isozyme of cytochrome P-450 (P-450db 1) that is responsible for the metabolism of a select group of drugs. In order to investigate the potential for quinidine to inhibit other isozymes of cytochrome P-450 and to assess whether or not P-450db 1 plays any role in antipyrine metabolism, we studied the effects of quinidine pretreatment on the pharmacokinetics and metabolism of antipyrine in six healthy, male volunteers. Using a randomized, crossover study design with a 2-week washout period between treatments, subjects received a single 1 gram antipyrine dose alone or with quinidine sulfate 200 mg orally every 8 hours for 24 hours prior to the dose of antipyrine and over the 48 hours following antipyrine administration. Mean serum concentrations, apparent oral clearance (1.93 +/- 0.86 vs 2.06 +/- 1.06 L/hr with quinidine) and half-life (13.5 +/- 3.3 vs 12.4 +/- 3.6 hr with quinidine) were not significantly different between the two treatments. The fraction of the administered dose recovered as antipyrine and measured metabolites (56.7% vs 59% with quinidine) as well as the recovery of each individual metabolite was not altered with quinidine pretreatment. In addition, the mean formation clearances for norantipyrine, 4-hydroxyantipyrine and 3-hydroxymethylantipyrine exhibited no change between treatment phases.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Sildenafil does not alter nelfinavir pharmacokinetics

The objective of this study was to investigate if sildenafil influences the pharmacokinetics of nelfinavir. Five HIV-infected patients on steady-state nelfinavir-containing therapy were subject to pharmacokinetic sampling for nelfinavir concentration twice: without sildenafil and with sildenafil 25 mg as a single dose. There were no differences in the AUC, T(max), or C(max) of nelfinavir. In a similar design, two patients on indinavir and two patients on ritonavir combined with saquinavir were studied. In accordance with the literature, neither of these two treatments was affected. It is concluded that nelfinavir pharmacokinetics were unaffected by concomitant intake of a single dose of sildenafil.     

Rosiglitazone does not alter the pharmacokinetics of metformin

Rosiglitazone is a potent oral antidiabetic agent of the thiazolidinedione class that works through activation of the peroxisome proliferator-activated nuclear receptor. It improves insulin sensitivity in peripheral tissues and effectively lowers blood glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes. Metformin is a dimethyl-biguanide, also used in type 2 diabetes, that lowers fasting blood glucose primarily by decreasing hepatic glucose output. Rosiglitazone and metformin reduce plasma glucose concentrations via different mechanisms and thus could potentially be used in combination to optimize glycemic control. This study evaluated the effects of the coadministration of these two agents on the pharmacokinetics of both rosiglitazone and metformin. Sixteen male volunteers (22-55 years old) received oral metformin (500 mg every 12 hours), rosiglitazone (2 mg every 12 hours), or the combination each for 4 days. Plasma collected on day 4 of each regimen was assayed for rosiglitazone and metformin concentrations. Oral doses of rosiglitazone and metformin were safe and well tolerated when administered alone or in combination. There were no clinically significant episodes of hypoglycemia or increased blood lactic acid levels following treatment with any regimen. Coadministration of rosiglitazone and metformin had no significant effects on the steady-state pharmacokinetics (AUC(0-12 h), Cmax, tmax, or t1/2) of either drug. The authors conclude that rosiglitazone can be safely administered with metformin and, due to the different mechanisms of action of these agents, may offer a therapeutic advantage in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.     

Manganese does not alter the severe neurotoxicity of MPTP

We utilized a mice model of Parkinsonism: (1) to evaluate 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP)-induced neurotoxicity; and (2) to evaluate whether manganese (Mn) exposure can affect MPTP-induced neurotoxicity. A 2 x 3 experimental design (MPTP x+/- Mn) was as follows: SS, MPTP(-) x Mn(-); SLMn, MPTP(-) x low Mn(+); SHMn, MPTP(-) x high Mn(+); MpS, MPTP(+) x Mn(-); MpLMn, MPTP(+) x low Mn(+); MpHMn, MPTP(+) x high Mn(+). We administered MPTP (30 mg/kg per day) to male C57BL/6 mice intraperitoneally, once a day for 5 days. Subsequently, mice were treated with either 2 or 8 mg/kg of MnCl(2).4H(2)O intraperitoneally, once a day for 3 weeks.Blood and striatal Mn levels were elevated in the Mnexposed groups. The number of tyrosine hydroxylase (TH)-immunoreactive (ir) neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta were decreased significantly in the MPTP-exposed groups. The densities of TH-ir axon terminals in caudate-putamen (CPU) were significantly decreased in the MPTP-treated groups. However, Mn treatment did not affect MPTP neurotoxicity. The densities of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP)-ir astrocytes in the CPU or globus pallidus were significantly increased in the MPTP-treated groups. Concentrations of dopamine in the striatum were decreased significantly in the MPTP-exposed groups only, but Mn had no effect.     

An opioid receptor antagonist, naltrexone, does not alter taste and smell responses in humans

Several studies have shown that an opioid receptor antagonist, naltrexone, decreases palatable food consumption. Naltrexone has also been reported to reduce ethanol intake in alcohol-preferring rodents and human alcoholics. The aim of the present study was to assess the effects of naltrexone on taste and smell responses in healthy male volunteers. Naltrexone did not alter intensity and pleasantness of sucrose, quinine, citric acid, sodium chloride, and ethanol taste. Similarly, ratings of olfactory stimuli (orange extract and ethanol) and Coca-Cola flavor were not influenced by the opioid antagonist. Our findings may indicate that: (i) naltrexone exerts marginal, if any, effects on gustatory and olfactory responses in humans; (ii) the drug does not alter orosensory responses to ethanol.     

TRPV1 activation is not an all-or-none event: TRPV1 partial agonism/antagonism and its regulatory modulation

TRPV1 has emerged as a promising therapeutic target for pain as well as a broad range of other conditions such as asthma or urge incontinence. The identification of resiniferatoxin as an ultrapotent ligand partially able to dissect the acute activation of TRPV1 from subsequent desensitization and the subsequent intense efforts in medicinal chemistry have revealed that TRPV1 affords a dramatic landscape of opportunities for pharmacological manipulation. While agonism and antagonism have represented the primary directions for drug development, the pharmacological complexity of TRPV1 affords additional opportunities. Partial agonism/partial antagonism, its modulation by signaling pathways, variable desensitization, and slow kinetics of action can all be exploited through drug design.     

Metoprolol or propranolol does not alter the kinetics of procainamide

Eight healthy volunteers received a single 500 mg intravenous dose of procainamide hydrochloride by 30-min infusion on three occasions in random sequence. The three modes of administration were (a) control, without concurrent drugs; (b) during coadministration of propranolol, 80 mg three times daily; and (c) during coadministration of metoprolol, 100 mg two times daily. Procainamide kinetics were determined from multiple serum concentrations measured by enzyme-multiplied immunoassay (EMIT) during 10 h after each dose. A metaproterenol infusion study verified a high degree of beta-blockade during trials 2 and 3. Mean procainamide half-life during the three trials (1.9, 2.2, and 2.3 h, respectively) tended to show prolongation during beta-blocker treatment, but the overall difference was of borderline significance (0.05 less than p less than 0.1). Total procainamide clearance (16.2, 14.1, and 13.7 ml/min/kg) did not differ significantly between the three trials, nor was there a significant change in area under the serum concentration curve for N-acetylprocainamide, the major metabolite. Thus the kinetics of procainamide in healthy persons are not importantly altered by typical therapeutic doses of two beta-adrenergic blockers.     

Moexipril does not alter the pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics of warfarin

Summary The potential effect of moexipril, a new converting enzyme inhibitor, on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a single dose of warfarin has been investigated.Ten healthy male volunteers received in a randomised crossover fashion a single oral dose of 50 mg warfarin sodium alone and together with the first dose of 6 days of oral treatment with moexipril 15 mg o.d.Mean oral plasma clearance of (R)-warfarin was 175 ml·h^–1 in the absence and 181 ml·h^–1 in the presence of moexipril, and the corresponding values for (S)-warfarin were 248 ml·h^–1 and 249 ml·h^–1. Apparent volume of distribution, peak plasma concentration, time to reach peak concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve both of (R)- and (S)-warfarin were not significantly affected. Moexipril did not alter the maximum prothrombin time (20.3 versus 20.1 s, respectively in the absence and presence of moexipril), time to maximum response (48.0 versus 50 h) and area under the prothrombin time versus time curve.The results suggest that a clinically important interaction between moexipril and warfarin is unlikely to occur in patients treated with both drugs.     

Quercetin does not alter lipopolysaccharide-induced fever in rats

Fever is considered an important component of the acute phase response of the body in defence against invading organisms such as bacteria. Quercetin, an important representative of the flavonoid class, has been extensively studied as an anti-inflammatory agent. In the present study, we investigated the effect of quercetin, administered orally (5, 25 and 50 mg kg(-1)) or intraperitoneally (50 mg kg(-1)), on the febrile response induced by either intraperitoneally (50 mug kg(-1)) or intravenously (5 mug kg(-1)) injected lipopolysaccharide (LPS from Escherichia coli) in rats. In contrast with the well known anti-inflammatory activity of quercetin, the results demonstrate that quercetin, at the doses used, did not alter the fever induced by LPS, regardless of the route of administration.     

Eriodictyol: a flavonoid antagonist of the TRPV1 receptor with antioxidant activity

The transient potential vanilloid 1 receptor (TRPV1) is a calcium-permeable channel responsible for the transduction and modulation of acute and chronic pain signaling. As such, this receptor is a potential target for the treatment of a number of pain disorders. However, AMG517, a TRPV1 antagonist, presents several clinical limitations that include the induction of severe hyperthermia. The aim of this study was to investigate the possible interaction of the flavonoid eriodictyol with the TRPV1 receptor and to determine its putative antinociceptive and hyperthermic effects. Eriodictyol was able to displace [³H]-resiniferatoxin binding (IC₅₀ = 47; 21–119 nM) and to inhibit calcium influx mediated by capsaicin (IC₅₀ = 44; 16–125 nM), suggesting that eriodictyol acts as a TRPV1 antagonist. Moreover, eriodictyol induced antinociception in the intraplantar capsaicin test, with maximal inhibition of 49 ± 10 and 64 ± 4% for oral (ID₅₀ = 2.3; 1.1–5.7 mg/kg) and intrathecal (ID₅₀ = 2.2; 1.7–2.9 nmol/site) administration, respectively. Eriodictyol did not induce any change in body temperature or locomotor activity. Orally administered eriodictyol (4.5 mg/kg) prevented the nociception induced by intrathecal injections of capsaicin, as well as the non-protein thiol loss and 3-nitrotyrosine (3-NT) formation induced by capsaicin in spinal cord. Eriodictyol also reduced the thermal hyperalgesia and mechanical allodynia elicited by complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA) paw injection. In conclusion, eriodictyol acts as an antagonist of the TRPV1 receptor and as an antioxidant; it induces antinociception without some of the side effects and limitations such as hyperthermia that are expected for TRPV1 antagonists.     

Flunitrazepam does not alter cerebral distribution of buprenorphine in the rat

Deaths have been reported among heroin addicts related to combined buprenorphine and flunitrazepam use. The aim of this study was to determine the existence of a drug-drug interaction during the distribution phase of buprenorphine. Arterial blood gases were measured after intravenous administration of buprenorphine alone (30 mg/kg), flunitrazepam alone (40 mg/kg) or both drugs in rats. Buprenorphine kinetics was studied in plasma and in striatum using cerebral microdialysis, both alone and after rat pretreatment with flunitrazepam. In contrast to buprenorphine or flunitrazepam alone, buprenorphine in combination with flunitrazepam induced a significant, rapid and sustained respiratory depression. Arterial PCO2 was increased at 1.5 min (6.7+/-0.2 versus 5.4+/-0.3 and 5.5+/-0.3 kPa, respectively, P=0.04) (mean+/-S.E.M.), and arterial pH decreased (7.37+/-0.02 versus 7.45+/-0.02 and 7.45+/-0.01, respectively, P=0.03). Plasma buprenorphine kinetics was well described by a three-compartment linear model, with a distribution half-life of 7.4+/-2.7 min and an elimination half-life of 463.9+/-152.3 min. However, neither plasma nor striatal buprenorphine kinetics were significantly altered by pre-administration of flunitrazepam. The adverse interaction between flunitrazepam and buprenorphine cannot be explained by a pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction during the distribution phase of buprenorphine.     

Ranitidine does not alter pethidine disposition in man.

The effect of concurrent ranitidine administration on the disposition of pethidine was investigated in eight healthy male volunteers (19-33 years). The subjects received 70 mg i.v. pethidine HCl doses before and during ranitidine treatment (150 mg p.o. twice daily). Ranitidine therapy was not associated with significant alterations in pethidine elimination rate constant, volume of distribution at steady state, total body clearance, and 24 h urinary excretion. No alteration in pethidine oxidation to norpethidine was noted, as suggested by nonsignificant changes in lag time to appearance of quantifiable norpethidine in serum, time to peak concentration, peak concentration, area under the curve from time 0.24 h, and 24 h urinary excretion. It would appear that, unlike cimetidine, ranitidine does not interact pharmacokinetically with pethidine. Further studies are necessary to evaluate the potential clinical advantages of ranitidine vs cimetidine therapy in patients also receiving pethidine.     

Cimetidine does not alter morphine disposition in man.

1 The pharmacokinetic parameters of morphine were determined in a crossover fashion following 4 days pretreatment with cimetidine, 300 mg every 6 h, or placebo. 2 Cimetidine had no apparent effect on the mean morphine plasma clearance, volume of distribution, AUC or half-life (P greater than 0.05; power greater than 0.80). 3 Cimetidine had no apparent effect on the magnitude or duration of morphine induced miosis. 4 The absence of a demonstrable effect on the pharmacokinetics of a drug with a high extraction ratio such as morphine suggests that cimetidine did not significantly reduce hepatic blood flow in ambulant normal volunteers.     

Bright light does not alter muscarinic receptor binding parameters

Seasonal Affective Disorders (SADs) are disorders of mood characterized by recurrent episodes of illness with a fixed relationship to season. Winter depression is characterized by recurrent onset of depression in the fall or winter followed by spontaneous recovery in the spring. This syndrome is responsive to treatment with bright light. The pathophysiology of depressive disorders may involve central muscarinic mechanisms. This possibility led to a series of physiological studies. The authors now report that contrary to expectation, treatment with bright light did not decrease the density of muscarinic receptors in either the hypothalamus or striatum.     

Norfloxacin does not alter warfarin's disposition or anticoagulant effect

Drug interactions related to inhibition of hepatic drug metabolism have been identified for some fluoroquinolone antibiotics. This study was designed to investigate whether the fluoroquinolone norfloxacin at the usual clinical dosage interacts with the anticoagulant agent warfarin. Ten healthy male subjects were administered a single oral dose of 30 mg warfarin sodium alone or during multiple-dose treatment with norfloxacin, 400 mg bid, in a randomized, crossover fashion. Plasma warfarin concentrations and prothrombin times were measured for 6 days after each of the two warfarin doses. The pharmacokinetic parameters of warfarin were comparable in the absence and presence of norfloxacin, including no significant differences in warfarin's elimination half-life, apparent total clearance, apparent volume of distribution, or peak plasma concentration. Norfloxacin also had no significant effect on the anticoagulant effect of warfarin, as assessed by the area under the prothrombin time versus time curve and the maximum response for prothrombin time. The lack of pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic interaction observed in this study suggests that a clinically important interaction of norfloxacin and warfarin is unlikely to occur in patients requiring both drugs.     

Chronic treatment with oestradiol does not alter in vitro LTP in subfield CA1 of the female rat hippocampus

Population excitatory post-synaptic potentials (pEPSPs) were recorded in vitro from subfield CA1 of the hippocampus of female rats which had been ovariectomized and treated for 14 days with either oil or 17beta-oestradiol (10 microg/day). The currents applied to the Schaffer collateral-commissural input necessary to induce threshold, maximum and 50% maximum pEPSP responses did not differ between groups. Application of trains of pulses (0.1-1 s; 100 Hz) evoked post-tetanic and long-term (> 60 min) potentiation of pEPSP responses, the magnitude of which was related to stimulus duration in both groups. However, the degree of potentiation induced by near-threshold (0.1, 0.15 and 0.2 s) and saturating (1 s) stimuli did not differ between groups. Thus, despite reports that oestradiol can modulate synaptic spine density and glutamatergic and GABAergic components of the inputs to CA1, these data suggest that chronic oestradiol treatment has no effect on either the excitability or induction of LTP in the Schaffer collateral-commissural-CA1 pathway.     

Propranolol does not alter flutoprazepam kinetics and metabolism in the rat

The influence of propranolol on the disposition of flutoprazepam, a benzodiazepine derivative extensively biotransformed by hepatic microsomal oxidation, was evaluated in the rat. Propranolol was infused subcutaneously with osmotic minipumps (5 mg/day) to obtain steady-state concentrations of about 200 ng/ml. Flutoprazepam (5 mg/kg) was given intraperitoneally on the third day of propranolol infusion. There was some variability in flutoprazepam disposition, consistent with the concept of an extensive first-pass metabolism of high-extraction drugs. Propranolol had no significant effects on the kinetics of flutoprazepam or norflutoprazepam, an active metabolite possibly accounting for a substantial part of the parent compound's pharmacological and clinical effects. It was concluded that there is no evidence of any pharmacokinetic interaction between this beta-adrenoceptor blocker and flutoprazepam in the rat.     

Azithromycin does not alter the effects of oral midazolam on human performance

Since macrolide antibiotics inhibit the oxidative hepatic metabolism of various drugs, including midazolam, the present double blind studies were conducted to find out if azithromycin, a new macrolide of the azalide type, would inhibit the metabolism of midazolam and enhance the effects of midazolam on human performance. In Study I, 64 healthy medical students, divided in four parallel groups received placebo, midazolam (10 mg or 15 mg), and midazolam 10 mg combined with azithromycin (500mg+250mg). In Study II, three males received oral midazolam 10 mg in combination with placebo, azithromycin or erythromycin 750 mg (as a positive control) in a cross-over trial. Objective and subjective tests were done before the intake of midazolam and 30 and 90 min after it, and venous blood was sampled for the assay of midazolam.In the placebo group in Study I, the mean numbers of letters cancelled (LC) at baseline, 30 min and 90 min were 21, 20 and 20, respectively, and the corresponding mean numbers of correct digit symbol substitutions (DSS) were 126, 137 and 140, indicating a practice effect. Midazolam 10 mg impaired these performances (21, 13 and 12 for LC, and 127, 113 and 111 for DSS). Either dose of midazolam produced clumsiness, mental slowness and poor subjective performance, midazolam 15 mg being slightly more active. The corresponding, scores in the azithromycin + midazolam group were 21, 16, 16 for LC, and 132, 121 and 119 for DSS, the only significant difference from placebo being the impairment of DSS at 90 min. The combination differed from midazolam 15 mg in producing less drowsiness and mental slowness. In Study II, mean plasma midazolam concentrations (g·1^-1) after erythromycin + midazolam 10 mg were 0 (baseline), 168 (30 min) and 113 (90 min), which were higher than the values (0, 79 and 41) after placebo + midazolam. The corresponding concentrations (g·1^-1) after azithromycin + midazolam (0, 85 and 46) were similar to those found after placebo + midazolam. Erythromycin but not azithromycin enhanced the objective and subjective effects of midazolam. Our results suggest that as azithromycin, unlike erythromycin, does not interfere with midazolam metabolism, it also does not enhance the effects of midazolam.     

Tegaserod coadministration does not alter the pharmacokinetics of theophylline in healthy subjects

Tegaserod (HTF 919), a selective 5-HT4 receptor partial agonist, is in development for the treatment of functional gastrointestinal motility disorders. Tegaserod has been found to inhibit cytochrome P-450 (CYP) 1A2, for which theophylline is a prototype substrate. This study was designed to assess the effect of tegaserod on the single-dose pharmacokinetic and safety profile of theophylline. Eighteen subjects were enrolled in a randomized, open-label, two-period crossover study. After an overnight fast, subjects were randomized to receive one of two treatments: (1) a single dose of controlled-release formulation of theophylline (Theo-Dur, 600 mg) on day 1 or (2) a single dose of tegaserod (6 mg) on day 1, concomitant administration of tegaserod (6 mg) and theophylline (600 mg) on the morning of day 2, followed by an additional dose of tegaserod (6 mg) 12 hours later. Four to 10 days later, the subjects received the alternative treatment regimen. The pharmacokinetic parameters of theophylline, including AUC, Cmax, and t(1/2lambda z), were similar for both treatment regimens, although the tmax of theophylline was statistically different between the treatments. Except for a decrease in partial metabolic formation clearance from theophylline to 1-methyluric acid, which is unlikely to be clinically relevant, there were no statistically significant differences in renal clearance of theophylline and partial metabolic formation clearances following the combined treatment compared with theophylline alone. The results of the current study indicate that no dose adjustment is required when drugs metabolized via CYP1A2 are coadministered with tegaserod.