Undersensing of P Waves in the Presence of an Adequate P Wave Due to Automatic Postventricular Atrial Refractory Period Extension

Two cases in which a DDD pacemaker failed to track P waves due to repetitive activation of the automatic postventricular atrial refractory period (PVARP) extension are reported. In one case, the cycle was initiated by a premature ventricular contraction (PVC); in the other, by touching the unipolar pacemaker with a needle while suturing. We demonstrated that chest wall stimulation can be used to induce cycles of repetitive automatic PVARP extension and failure to track P waves. We demonstrated in vitro that touching a unipolar pacemaker with a needle can generate a signal sufficient to mimic a QRS complex, and initiate a cycle of repetitive P wave undersensing.     

Early Clinical Experience with a Minute Ventilation Sensor DDDR Pacemaker

The new DDDR pacemaker META DDDR utilizes a minute veritilation sensor based on transthoracic impedance measurements. The sensor determines the metabolic indicated interval, the atrioventricular (AV) delay and the postventricular atrial refractory period (PVARP). The baseline PVARP must be carefully selected to define nonphysiological tachycardias. If a Pwave falls within the PVARP the pacemaker will automatically switch to the VVIR mode. This behavior prevents tracking of paroxysmal atrial tachyarrhythmias (PAT). Twenty-eight patients with sinus node dysfunction (n = 20), AV junction ablation (n = 5), complete or intermittent AV block (n = 3); who received a META DDDR pacemaker were studied. The mean age was 65 ± 13 years. Results: mode switching (reversion) to VVIR was observed in 57% of the patients. Forty-two percent had episodes of mode switching to VVIR during a stress test four related to PAT, and seven to sinus tachycardia. Fifty percent had episodes of mode switching to VVIR during a 24-hour Holter, four related to PAT, three to retrograde P wave sensing, and two to sinus tachycardia. At the last follow-up, 20 of the 26 patients initially programmed to the DDDR mode remained in the DDDR mode, while five were reprogrammed to the DDD and one to the VVIR mode. Mode switching has a high sensitivity but a low specificity for PAT. It appears to be a useful approach to prevent rapid tracking of atrial tachyarrhythmias. Careful PVARP programming is critical to appropriate reversion behavior, but further modifications of the algorithm are needed to improve its performance.     

Use of a New Fallback Function to Prevent Endless-Loop Tachycardias: First Clinical Results

The methods used for preventing endless-loop tachycardias (ELTs) most often consist of initiating a long postventricular atrial refractory period (PVARP) with the sensing of every event likely to induce ELTs, such as sensed premature ventricular contractions (PVCs). A new fallback function may be useful to prevent the initiation of ELTs. A window of atrial rate acceleration detection (WARAD) is initiated with the sensing of every sinus event and equals 75% of the preceding PP interval. If an atrial event is sensed during this period, as are premature atrial contractions (PACs), no atrioventricular (AV) delay is initiated, but an atrial puise output is delivered and a subsequent 31-msec AV delay is started. Theoretically retrograde P waves are premature compared to sinus rhythm. They are therefore detected as PACs, and do not initiate AV delay, thus prohibiting the induction of ELTs. This function was tested in six patients, using external or implanted Chorus 2 pacemakers. Short PVARP (203 msec) and high atrial sensibility were programmed. Retrograde conduction was induced either by inefficient atrial pacing or a long programmed AV delay. Two different dual chamber settings were tested: dual chamber pacing with the fallback function On or Off. In every situation, the function proved effective in preventing ELTs: the number of tachycardia episodes went from 124 with the function programmed Off to 5 with the function programmed On for comparable durations. More than 75 ELTs effectively prevented by fallback have been recorded.     

Programming a Long Paced Atrioventricular Interval May Be Risky in DDDR Pacing

In patients with intermittent AV block and dual chamber pacemakers, a long paced AV interval of 200 msec or more can be selected to prolong pulse generator life (by avoiding the ventricular pace output) and to enable a more physiological and hemodynamically superior activation sequence. This case report describes the potential risks of programming a long paced AV interval in a patient with a DDDR pacemaker. T wave pacing, as described here, can occur if the conducted QRS complex is not sensed because it occurs during the ventricular blanking period (delivery of the atrial stimulus). This can be initiated by the mechanisms that induce apparent and actual P wave undersensing of the conducted QRS complex. In this case report apparent P wave undersensing and subsequent T wave pacing with ventricular capture (in a patient with intermittent AV block) occurred frequently during an exercise test done in the DDDR mode with a paced AV interval of 200 msec, according to the clinical evaluation protocol.     

A New Approach to the Prevention of Endless Loop Tachycardia in DDD and VVD Pacing

Endless loop tachycardia (ELT) is a possible complication in dual chamber pacing; it is usually prevented by programming the atrial refractory period (PVARP) longer than the retrograde ventriculoatrial (VA) conduction interval; this in some patients limits the upper rate. In 15 patients with a DDD (nine patients) or a single-pass lead VDD pacemaker (six patients) and retrograde atrial activation, telemetric recording documented a significant difference in amplitude of antegrade, and retrograde atrial potentials (VDD 1.21 ± 0.32 mV vs 0.56 ± 0.23 mV, P = 0.008; DDD 2.7 ± 1 vs 1.8 ± 1 mV, P - 0.038; Student's t-test for paired data). In 3/15 patients ELT stopped after programming of atrial sensitivity to a value. greater than the retrograde P wave amplitude; in 11/15 patients this occurred at a sensing value lower than or equal to retrograde P wave amplitude with a high pass band filter operating. One patient required PVARP lengthening. Holter monitoring showed no more ELTs. In most patients with a DDD or single-pass lead VDD pacemaker with widely programmable sensing amplitude and Hi/Low bandpass filters. individual programming of atrial channel sensitivity prevents ELT without affecting the PVARP and, consequently, upper rate limit.     

An Optimized AV Delay Algorithm for Patients with Intermittent Atrioventricular Conduction

Detection and promotion of an intermittent atrioventricular (A V) conduction is the objective of an AV delay hysteresis algorithm in dual chamber pacemaker (DDDj pacing. The AV delay following an atrial event is automatically extended by a programmable interval (AV hysteresis interval) if the previous cycle showed spontaneous AV conduction, i.e., a ventricular event was detected within the previous AV delay. An automatic search mode scans for spontaneous ventricular events during the hysteresis interval: a single AV delay extension (equal to the programmed AV delay hysteresis) will occur after a successive, programmable number of AV cycles with ventricular pacing. If a spontaneous AV conduction is present, the AV delay will remain extended by the hysteresis interval. Our first results in 17 patients with intermittent AV block disclosed a satisfactorily working algorithm with effective reduction of ventricular stimuli. In relation to the underlying conduction disturbance and pacemaker settings, the majority of our patients showed a reduction of ventricular pacing events up to 90% without any adverse hemodynamic or electrophysiological changes. Based on clinical (promotion of a physiological activation and contraction sequence) and technical (reduction of power consumption) advantages, the AV hysteresis principle could be of incremental value for future dual chamber pacing in patients with intermittent complete heart block.     

DDI Pacing: Indications, Expectations, and Follow-Up

The DDI mode of pacing that permits noncompetitive atrioventricular sequential bradycardia support was chosen in 65 of 480 (14%) patients selected for dual chamber pacing between February 1985 and March 1990. All patients were implanted with Pacesetter 283 or 285 pulse generators and programmed to DDI. The indications for pacing were sick sinus syndrome (n = 52), combined sinus node dysfunction and AV block (n = 13). Forty-two of these patients had a history of paroxysmal atrial arrhythmias. All patients received passive fixation atrial and ventricular leads. Follow-up thereafter was performed predischarge, and at 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months after discharge. The duration of follow-up ranged from 1-61 months (mean 31 months). Fifty-four of 65 (83%) patients chosen for DDI remain programmed in the DDI mode. Three patients were reprogrammed to VVI and eight to DDD. During the course of follow-up, six patients presented with effective VVI pacing with consistent ventriculoatrial conduction that was appropriately sensed by the atrial circuit with atrial output inhibition. A further four patients presented with "functional undersensing" due to ventricular blanking period (VBP) characteristics in these pulse generators and in this mode. Functional undersensing was eliminated in all but one patient by reprogramming the VBP to 13 msec with no subsequent episodes of provoked crosstalk inhibition. Effective VVI pacing was observed in patients with AV block during times of sinus acceleration. While DDI mode is an effective form of pacing, permitting non-competitive atrioventricular sequential pacing, potential limitations include: effective VVI pacing during intact ventriculoatrial conduction, functional undersensing when long VBP are programmed, and effective VI pacing with sinus node acceleration during AV block.     

Use of a Dual Chamber Pacemaker with a Novel Fallback Algorithm as an Effective Treatment for Sick Sinus Syndrome Associated with Transient Supraventricular Tachyarrhythmia

A dual chamber pacemaker having a fallback (FB) mode was utilized in nine patients with sick sinus syndrome (SSS) associated with transient supraventricular tachyarrhythmia (atrial fibrillation [Af] in three patients, atrial flutter [AF] in two, and paroxysmal atrial tachyarrhythmia [PAT] in four). Various degrees of abnormality of atrioventricular (AV) conduction were observed at the time of pacemaker implantation in five patients. In this pacemaker, a DDD mode was active during sinus rhythm, but the mode changed, through a given cycle of high rale tracking at an upper rate limit (VRL), to VDI only during intrinsic atrial rate increases that were either normally or abnormally above the URL. The VDI mode automatically returned to DDD when the atrial rate fell below the URL. At follow-up periods of 7–12 months, this pacemaker appeared to be especially effective in those SSS patients with transient Af or AF. In the SSS patients with PAT, however, the FB mode was not active because the PAT rhythm was conducted to the ventricle without block (1:1 conduction) and thus the given cycles of ventricular tracking at the URL did not occur. From the repetitive FB starting tests that were performed during an Af period in one patient with transient Af, a 2:1 point setting of a given URL plus 30–50 ppm was required to quickly start the FB algorithm. Moreover, an atrial sensitivity setting that was less than half of the P wave amplitude was desirable. These results suggest that, when properly set, the DDD plus FB mode is useful in a SSS patient with transient supraventricular tachyarrhythmia when a significant degree of AV block is present.     

Method of atrioventricular programming in atrial flutter in patients with biventricular pacemaker

BACKGROUND: Atrial flutter is a common cause of exacerbation of congestive heart failure (CHF). Typically, during atrial tachycardia, pacemakers, both dual and biventricular, are programmed to ignore atrial tracking. Virtually all current pacemakers and defibrillators use a programmable mode switch algorithm to switch between atrial tracking modes (DDD, DDDR) to nontracking modes (DDIR, DDI, VVI) during episodes of atrial tachycardia. METHODS: In this report, we describe a novel method of atrioventricular (AV) pacemaker programming in four patients with atrial flutter and CHF who remained symptomatic postbiventricular pacemaker implantation. All patients had chronic atrial flutter upon interrogation; adjustment of AV delay and postventricular atrial refractory period (PVARP) was performed to enable sensing of every second to fourth atrial flutter beat by the atrial lead. Mode switch was turned "OFF" in all points, and lower and upper rate limits were set to 50 and 100 bpm. Once sequential early and late diastolic filling was seen on mitral inflow pulsed-wave (PW) Doppler, further adjustment of AV delay and PVARP was performed until the highest and broadest atrial velocity occurred on mitral inflow PW Doppler. RESULTS: All patients developed improvement in aortic ejection duration and peak ejection velocity during AV optimization. Repeat ECG in these patients at 8 months, 7 days, 2 days, and 2 months postoptimization showed no change in P and QRS relationship. All patients developed improvement in CHF symptoms postbiv pacemaker optimization. CONCLUSION: In symptomatic patients with CHF and stable atrial flutter who have a biventricular pacemaker, atrial mechanical contribution to cardiac output can be achieved by adjusting PVARP and AV delay during echo-guided pacemaker programming.     

Pacemaker Syndrome Induced by the Mode Switching Algorithm of a DDDR Pacemaker

A patient with marked first-degree AV block and a DDDR pacemaker presented with a history of paroxysmal narrow QRS tachycardia, subsequently identified as sinus tachycardia (with a very long PR interval), causing a clinical problem similar to pacemaker syndrome because of loss of AV synchrony. The latter resulted from an excessively long postventricular atrial refractory period (PVARP) that prevented sensing of sinus P waves. The unfavorable hemodynamics caused reflex sinus tachycardia. The long PVARP was mandated by the mode switching algorithm of this particular device and was automatically set according to the selected tachycardia detection rate. The patient became asymptomatic when the mode switching function was turned off and the PVARP shortened.     

A Comparison of VVIR and DDDR Pacing Following Cardiac Transplantation

We compared the clinical course of patients paced in VVIR versus DDDR mode to determine the most appropriate method of pacing following cardiac transplantation. Pacemaker implantation was required in 9 of 90 orthotopic cardiac transplants (10%). Indications included sinus bradycardia or sinus arrest (8 patients) and AV node dysfunction (1 patient). VVIR pacemakers were implanted in four patients and DDDR in five patients. DDDR patients : The mean P wave was 1.7 mV and the mean atrial stimulation threshold was 0.8 V (at 0.5 msec). During follow-up of 20 months, two atrial lead complications developed (29% of leads in 33% of patients). No lead complications were directly related to endomyocardial biopsy. VVIR patients : All four patients developed VA conduction with mean VA time 180 msec (160–240 msec). Two patients developed pacemaker syndrome. Conclusions : VA conduction and pacemaker syndrome may develop in cardiac transplant recipients paced in the VVIR mode. Dual chamber pacing is technically feasible and preferable following cardiac transplantation.     

Functional Atrial Undersensing Associated with Switching to a Tracking Mode of Pacing

We have previously demonstrated that contemporary St. Jude devices (pacemakers and implantable cardioverter‐defibrillators [ICDs]; St. Jude Medical, Sylmar, CA, USA) are designed to generate an extended postventricular atrial refractory period (PVARP) of 475 ms at the termination of conventional automatic mode switching (AMS) in response to atrial tachyarrhythmias . This response may cause functional atrial undersensing . A similar PVARP response unrelated to conventional AMS was found in four St. Jude devices (three ICDs and one pacemaker) whenever a nontracking pacing mode switched to a tracking DDD(R) mode. PVARP extension and functional atrial undersensing were observed when the VOO, VVI, and the DDI(R) modes (unrelated to conventional AMS) switched to the DDD(R) mode . In one patient the switch from the OOO mode (in the programmed noise reversion mode) to the DDD mode occurred after cessation of electromagnetic interference disturbing the ventricular channel. In this case PVARP extension was seen only in the corresponding markers because no P waves occurred coincidentally with the extended PVARP. The PVARP extension caused by a mode switch to the tracking function was designed to prevent sensing of a retrograde P wave on the first cycle of the reestablished tracking mode. The observed functional atrial undersensing is a normal manifestation of device function and must not be misinterpreted as a true atrial undersensing problem. (PACE 2012; 35:1188–1193)     

Atrial Arrhythmia Management with Sensor Controlled Atrial Refractory Period and Automatic Mode Switching in Patients with Minute Ventilation Sensing Dual Chamber Rate Adaptive Pacemakers

Although a long postventricular atrial refractory period fPVARP) may prevent the occurrence of pacemaker mediated tachycardias and inadvertent tracking of atrial arrhythmias in dual chamber (DDD) pacing, the maximum upper rate will necessarily be compromised. We tested the feasibility of using minute ventilation sensing in a dual chamber rate adaptive pacemaker (DDDR) to shorten the PVARP during exercise in 13 patients with bradycardias (resting PVARP = 463 ± 29 msec) to avoid premature upper rate behavior. Graded treadmill exercise tests in the DDD and DDDR modes at this PVARP resulted in maximum ventricular rates of 98 ± 8 and 142 ± 3 beats/min, respectively (P < 0.0001), due to chronotropic incompetence and upper rate limitation in the DDD mode, both circumvened with the use of sensor. In order to simulate atrial arrhythmias, chest wall stimulation was applied for 30 seconds at a rate of 250 beats/min at a mean unipolar atrial sensitivity of 0.82 mV. Irregular ventricular responses occurred in the DDD mode fthe rates at a PVARP of 280 and 463 ± 29 msec were, respectively 92 ± 5 and 66 ± 3 msec; P < 0.0001). In the DDDR mode at a PVARP of 463 ± 29 msec, regular ventricular pacing at 53 ± 2 beats/min occurred due to mode switching to VVIR mode in the presence of repetitive sensed atrial events within the PVARP. One patient developed spontaneous atrial fibrillation on follow-up, which was correctly identified by the pacemaker algorithm, resulting in mode switch from DDDR to regular VVIR pacing and preservation of rate response. In conclusion, sensor controlled PVARP allows a long PVARP to be used at rest without limiting the maximum rate during exercise. In addition, to offer protection against retrograde conduction, a long PVARP and mode switching also limit the rate during atrial arrhythmias and allow regular ventricular rate responses according to the physiological demands.     

Atrio-Ventricular and Ventriculo-Atrial Conduction Times in Patients Undergoing Pacemaker Implant

Pacemaker mediated reentrant tachycardias have been seen frequently during use of dual chamber sensing pacemakers and are dependent on the presence of intact retrograde (ventriculo-atrial) conduction. The status of a patient's retrograde (VA) conduction cannot be determined from the surface electrocardiogram. At the time of pacemaker implant the state of ante-grade conduction should be determined at incremental atrial pacing rates, the exact timing measured from the intracardiac electrograms, i.e., from the intrinsic deflection of the atrium to the intrinsic deflection of the ventricle. With this information obtained in 53 patients, if was possible to determine which patients could safely receive dual chamber sensing pacemaker devices, the appropriate pacemaker atrial refractory period setting to avoid pacemaker mediated tachycardias in those patients with intact retrograde conduction, and the optimal timing for programming the pacemaker's A V delay. Patients who have been studied in this manner and who were felt to be suitable for a dual chamber sensing device have not displayed pacemaker mediated reentrant tachycardias. Forty-seven percent of all patients who require pacemaker implant have VA 1:1 conduction; 67% of those with sinus node dysfunction and 14% of those with complete antegrade block have VA conduction at a mean interval of 235 ± 50 ms (range 110–380 ms).     

A New Algorithm for a High Level of Protection Against Pacemaker-Mediated Tachycardia

Pacemaker-mediated tachycardia (PMT) is a well-known complication of DDD pacing. PMT needs a permeable V-A conduction and is usually initiated by a premature ventricular or atrial systole, artifact sensing, or misprogramming (long AV delay [AVD]). Today, protection against PMT is expected from pacemaker multiprogrammability. Unfortunately, this prevention is often ineffective; postventricular atrial refractory period (PVARP) must be prolonged, which limits the upper tracking rate and the patient capacity. The new Chorus ELA Medical DDD pacemaker provides classic protection against PMT (PVARP prolongation after premature V or A complex, magnet application, noise sensing), hut also automatically reduces an eventual PMT and adjusts AVD or PVARP for a high level of protection. The process is divided in four steps: (1) a sensing step for 16 cycles, with V-P conduction analysis; (2) confirmation of the presence of the PMT and analysis of V-A conduction time; (3) a termination step, by extending the PVARP after the following ventricular heart beat; and (4) in case of immediate recurrence of the tachycardia, reprogramming of the AVD and eventually of the PVARP. By first reducing AVD, before reprogramming PVARP, the pacemaker preserves point 2:1, providing a higher exercise capacity. This algorithm was successfully tested in three patients who had a permeable V-A conduction, without any adverse effect.     

Interatrial Conduction During Cardiac Pacing

DDD pacemakers sense and pace right-sided cardiac chambers. The relationship of atrial to ventricular systole on the left side of the heart is of importance for systemic hemodynamics. Effective atrioventricular synchrony is partially determined by interatrial conduction time (IACT). At the time of DDD pacemaker implantation, interatrial conduction was measured using an intraesophageal pill electrode in 25 patients who were on no cardiac medications. Mean interatrial conduction time for all patients prolonged from 95 ± 18 ms during sinus rhythm to 122 ± 30 ms during right atrial pacing (p < 0.001). In 16 patients with P wave duration < 110 ms interatrial conduction prolonged from 85 ± 10 ms during sinus rhythm to 111 ± 9 ms during right atrial pacing (p < 0.01) compared to 114 ± 20 ms prolonging to 111 ± 19 ms (p < 0.01] in 9 patients with P wave duration > 110 ms. In each patient, while atrioventricular conduction prolonged with incremental right atrial pacing, interatrial conduction times did not vary. Interatrial conduction prolongs from baseline during atrial pacing and remains constant at all paced rates from 60–160 heats per minute. In addition to longer interatrial conduction times during sinus rhythm, patients with electrocardiographic P wave prolongation have longer interatrial conduction times during right atrial pacing than do normals (p < 0.0001). Based on interatrial conduction times alone, the AV interval during DDD cardiac pacing should be approximately 25 ms longer during AV pacing as compared to atrial tracking.     

Continuous Holter telemetry of atrial electrograms and marker annotations using a common Holter recording system: impact on Holter electrocardiogram interpretation in patients with dual chamber pacemakers

The impact of continuous telemetry of atrial electrogram and marker annotations on Holter ECG interpretation was assessed in 98 patients with bipolar dual chamber pacemakers (VDD pacemakers n = 29, DDD(R) systems n = 69). Atrial electrogram and marker annotations were continuously sampled by a telemetry coil that was externally positioned on the pacemaker pocket, amplified, and transduced to a three-channel Holter ECG recorder in addition to an ECG recording. Holter tapes were analyzed by two experienced investigators for quality of P wave recognition and episodes suspicious of pacemaker dysfunction. Initially, only the ECG channel was analyzed. Thereafter, results were compared to those achieved on the basis of the complete recording including atrial electrogram and marker annotations. Recognition of atrial rhythm was markedly improved by Holter telemetry. During 99.3% of recording time telemetry showed a satisfying quality, whereas ECG alone allowed a reliable P wave recognition only during 84.4% of recording time (P < 0.001). One hundred twenty-nine episodes suspicious of pacemaker malfunction occurred in 17 of 98 patients. By analysis of ECG, only 78.3% of episodes were concordantly classified by the investigators. However, 98.4% of all episodes were properly identified when atrial electrogram and marker annotations were added to the analysis (P < 0.001). In particular, discrimination between atrial undersensing, sinus bradycardia, and atrial sensed events within the refractory periods was facilitated. Holter telemetry of atrial electrogram and marker annotations facilitates the analysis of Holter ECGs in pacemaker recipients and improves the detection of pacemaker dysfunctions.     

Delayed Restoration of Atrioventricular Synchrony with Beat-to-Beat Mode Switch

BODE, F., et al. : Delayed Restoration of Atrioventricular Synchrony with Beat-to-Beat Mode Switch. This case report describes a patient with complete AV block and a VDD pacemaker who experienced repetitive episodes of symptomatic bradycardia. Episodes occurred due to activation of an automatic beat-to-beat mode switch algorithm. After mode switch to VDI operation, the pacemaker failed to immediately switch back to AV synchronous pacing when regular sinus rhythm (≥ 100 beats per minute) resumed despite adequate P wave sensing. Dizziness was felt for up to several minutes of asynchronous pacing at the lower rate limit until VDD mode was restored. Episodes were completely eliminated by programming the mode switch function from an automatic beat-to-beat algorithm to a fixed rate algorithm.     

VDD Single Pass Lead Pacing; Sustained Pacemaker Mediated Tachycardias Unrelated to Retrograde Atrial Activation

Pacemaker mediated tachycardias (PMTs) are a well known complication of P synchronous pacing. Although the initiating mechanisms are severel, all of them are associated with retrograde atrial activation, which is sensed by the atrial sensing channel, resulting in ventricular pacing. In 19 patients suffering from symptomatic AV conduction disturbances and normal sinus node function, a VDD pacing system connected to a single pass ventricular lead with dual chamber electrodes was implanted. The bipolar atrial electrode, floating in the right atrium, was used to detect endocardial atrial electrograms that were differentially processed within the pacemaker for optimal discrimination and filtering of undesirable signals. The widely programmable atrial sensitivity (amplitude and filtering) allowed stable P synchronized ventricular pacing in all patients, but in five of them, sustained PMTs not related to retrograde atrial activation was documented during the follow-up. The common mechanism for the onset and maintenance of these PMTs was traced to the abnormal sensing of the terminal forces of ventricular activation and for of the T wave. The possibility of interferences between ventricular and atrial electrodes (crosstalk) was also considered, The reduction of atrial channel sensitivity represented in all cases the only effective procedure to prevent this type of PMT. In conclusion, the best signal to noise ratio is an important endpoint (o assure the proper function of a single lead VDD pacing system. Furthermore, using the differential amplifier built within the pacemaker, consideration should be given to the optimal mode of rejection of the terminal forces of the QRS and T wave.     

Failure to Sense P Waves During DDD Pacing

ECG tracings of three patients in whom AV universal (DDD) pacemakers were implanted intermittently demonstrated dropped P waves. In one patient, true atrial undersensing was present; in the others, sensing of the atrial electrode was appropriate, but sensing of sinus P waves was intermittently blocked by normal pacemaker operation. In this report we discuss the electrocardiographic diagnosis of atrial undersensing in order to avoid unnecessary reinterventions.