Pharmacokinetic properties of esomeprazole in adolescent patients aged 12 to 17 years with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease: A randomized, open-label study

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the pharmacokinetic (PK) properties and tolerability of esomeprazole 20 and 40 mg after single and repeated oral doses in adolescents with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). RESULTS: The study included 15 boys and 13 girls (mean age, 14.3 years). Geometric mean AUC(0-infinity) values (overall drug exposure) were 1.58 and 5.57 micromol . h/L (0.027 and 0.083 pmol x h x L(-1)/kg) after single-dose administration of esomeprazole 20 and 40 mg, respectively, on day 1. Corresponding values with repeated doses (day 8) were 3.65 and 13.86 micromol x h/L (0.064 and 0.207 micromol x h x L(-1)/kg). Geometric mean Cmax values were 0.67 and 2.78 micromol/L (0.012 and 0.041 micromol/L x kg(-1)) with single-dose administration of esomeprazole 20 and 40 mg, respectively, and 1.45 and 5.13 micromol/L (0.026 and 0.075 micromol/L x kg(-1)), respectively, with repeated doses (day 8). These mean AUC(0-infinity) and CmaX values were >2-fold with the 40 mg dose compared with the 20-mg dose with single- and repeated-dose administration. The most common adverse event was headache (2 [7.1%] patients). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that the PK parameters of esomeprazole were both dose- and time-dependent in these adolescents with GERD. Both doses of esomeprazole were well tolerated in this study population.     

Pharmacokinetic properties of esomeprazole in children aged 1 to 11 years with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a randomized, open-label study

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the overall exposure, other pharmacokinetic (PK) properties, and tolerability of esomeprazole magnesium after repeated oral doses of 5, 10, and 20 mg in pediatric patients who had symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). METHODS: This randomized, open-label study was conducted at West Coast Clinical Trials, Long Beach, California. Boys and girls aged 1 to 11 years who had a clinical diagnosis of GERD were included and stratified by age (1-5 years [younger group] and 6-11 years [older group]). For this 5-day study, children in the younger group were randomly assigned to receive 1 esomeprazole 5- or 10-mg capsule p.o. QD, and those in the older group were randomly assigned to receive 1 esomeprazole 10- or 20-mg capsule p.o. QD. On days 1 to 4, study medications were administered with the supervision of the study personnel 1 hour before breakfast. Blood samples were collected within 0.5 hour before and 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 hours after study drug administration on day 5. Plasma concentrations of esomeprazole were measured using reverse-phase liquid chromatography and mass-spectrometric detection. Tolerability assessments were performed by reviewing the number and severity of adverse events (collected via spontaneous reporting and direct questioning) and findings from the physical examination, which included vital-sign measurements and laboratory analysis (hematology, biochemistry, and urinalysis). Site personnel supervised the administration of the study drug to ensure compliance with treatment. RESULTS: The study included 31 children (17 boys, 14 girls; mean age, 5 years; 18 children in the younger group, 13 in the older group). A total of 27 children were included in the PK analysis. In the younger group, the geometric mean AUC(0-infinity) and Cmax values in the esomeprazole 10-mg group were >2-fold that in the 5-mg group (AUC(0-infinity), 4.83 and 0.74 pmol x h/L [0.32 and 0.04 micromol x h x L(-1)/kg], respectively; Cmax, 2.98 and 0.62 micromol/L [0.19 and 0.03 micromol/L x kg(-1)], respectively). In the older group, the geometric mean AUC(0-infinity) and Cmax values for the 20-mg dose group were approximately 2-fold those for the 10-mg dose group (AUC(0-infinity), 6.28 and 3.70 micromol x h/L [0.21 and 0.12 pmol x h x L(-1)/kg], respectively; Cmax, 3.73 and 1.77 micromol/L [0.13 and 0.06 micromol/L x kg 1], respectively). For the 10-mg esomeprazole dose, the geometric mean body-weight-normalized apparent oral clearance was approximately 50% higher in the younger group compared with the older group (0.40 and 0.25 L/h x kg(-1), respectively). Thirty patients were included in the tolerability analysis. The adverse events that occurred were skin excoriation, discolored feces, and skin laceration (1 [3.3%] patient each); none were considered related to treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this small study suggest that, in children aged 1 to 11 years who had GERD, the PK properties of esomeprazole may be both dose and age dependent and that younger children might have a more rapid metabolism of esomeprazole per kilogram of body weight compared with older children. Esomeprazole was well tolerated at doses of 5, 10, and 20 mg in the pediatric patients studied.     

Pharmacokinetic and safety profile of rupatadine when coadministered with azithromycin at steady-state levels: a randomized, open-label, two-way, crossover, Phase I study

BACKGROUND: Rupatadine is an oral active antihistamine and platelet-activating factor antagonist indicated for the management of allergic rhinitis and chronic urticaria in Europe. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to describe the effect of the concomitant administration of azithromycin and rupatadine on the pharmacokinetics of rupatadine and its metabolites after repeated doses. METHODS: This was a multiple-dose, randomized, open-label, 2-way, crossover, Phase I study in which healthy male and female volunteers received rupatadine 10 mg once a day for 6 days either alone or with azithromycin 500 mg on day 2 and 250 mg from day 3 to day 6. Treatments were administered after a fasting period of 10 hours with 240 mL of water, and fasting conditions were kept until 3 hours postmedication. A washout period of at least 21 days between the 2 active periods was observed. Blood samples were collected and plasma concentrations of rupatadine and its metabolites desloratadine and 3-hydroxydesloratadine were determined by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Tolerability was based on the recording of adverse events (AEs), physical examination, electrocardiograms, and laboratory screen controls at baseline and the final study visit. RESULTS: Twenty-four healthy volunteers (15 males, 9 females; mean [SD] age, 25.67 [5.58] years; weight, 65.96 [8.57] kg) completed the study. Except for maximum observed concentration during a dosing interval (Cmax,ss) of 3-hydroxydesloratadine, on average, there were no statistically significant differences in mean plasma concentrations in any of the main pharmacokinetic parameters of rupatadine, desloratadine, and 3-hydroxydesloratadine when administered in combination with azithromycin or alone. The Cmax,ss ratio was 111 (90% CI, 91-136) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve during a dosing interval (AUC0-tau) ratio had a value of 103 (90% CI, 91-117). The corresponding ratios for the rupatadine metabolites were 109 (90% CI, 100-120) for Cmax,ss and 103 (90% CI, 96-110) for AUC0-tau for desloratadine and 109 (90% CI, 103-115) for Cmax,ss and 104 (90% CI, 100-108) for AUC0-tau for 3-hydroxydesloratadine. Point estimates for Cmax,ss ratios using paired data were 111% for rupatadine, 109% for desloratadine, and 109% for 3-hydroxydesloratadine. The 90% CIs were included in the interval 80% to 125% for desloratadine and 3-hydroxydesloratadine, whereas 90% CI for rupatadine was shifted to the right of the interval used for comparing bioavailability of the drugs. A total of 5 subjects reported 9 AEs; 5 of these were thought to be related to the drug administration and all were categorized as mild or moderate. The reported AEs were somnolence (1/24 in the rupatadine group and 1/24 in the rupatadine plus azithromycin group), diarrhea (1/24 in the rupatadine plus azithromycin group), and gastric discomfort (2/24 in the rupatadine plus azithromycin group). Four AEs were considered not to be related (2 episodes of headache, 1 anemia, 1 cheilitis). All were resolved spontaneously. No serious AEs were reported. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study in these healthy volunteers found no significant differences in pharmacokinetic parameters other than Cmax,ss of 3-hydroxydesloratadine between rupatadine 10 mg administered alone or with azithromycin 500 mg on day 2 and 250 mg from day 3 to day 6. The administration of rupatadine compared with rupatadine plus azithromycin met the regulatory definition of bioequivalence in terms of exposure and rate parameters; however, Cmax,ss of rupatadine was outside the conventional confidence interval.     

Phase II, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study comparing the safety and pharmacokinetics of tefibazumab to placebo for treatment of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia

Tefibazumab (Aurexis), a humanized monoclonal antibody that binds to the surface-expressed adhesion protein clumping factor A, is under development as adjunctive therapy for serious Staphylococcus aureus infections. Sixty patients with documented S. aureus bacteremia (SAB) were randomized and received either tefibazumab at 20 mg/kg of body weight as a single infusion or a placebo in addition to an antibiotic(s). The primary objective of the study was determining safety and pharmacokinetics. An additional objective was to assess activity by a composite clinical end point (CCE). Baseline characteristics were evenly matched between groups. Seventy percent of infections were healthcare associated, and 57% had an SAB-related complication at baseline. There were no differences between the treatment groups in overall adverse clinical events or alterations in laboratory values. Two patients developed serious adverse events that were at least possibly related to tefibazumab; one hypersensitivity reaction was considered definitely related. The tefibazumab plasma half-life was 18 days. Mean plasma levels were <100 microg/ml by day 14. A CCE occurred in six patients (four placebo and two tefibazumab patients) and included five deaths (four placebo and one tefibazumab patient). Progression in the severity of sepsis occurred in four placebo and no tefibazumab patients. Tefibazumab was well tolerated, with a safety profile similar to those of other monoclonal antibodies. Additional trials are warranted to address the dosing range and efficacy of tefibazumab.     

Results of a multicenter, randomized, open-label efficacy and safety study of two doses of tigecycline for complicated skin and skin-structure infections in hospitalized patients

BACKGROUND: Tigecycline is a broad-spectrum glycylcycline antibiotic being investigated for the treatment of serious infections in hospitalized patients. Tigecycline has been shown to be efficacious against serious infections in animals, and preliminary studies in healthy adults have shown that tigecycline has an acceptable tolerability profile. OBJECTIVE: This study compared the clinical and microbiological efficacy, pharmacokinetic properties, and tolerability of 2 doses of tigecycline in hospitalized patients with a complicated skin and skin-structure infection (cSSSI). METHODS: This Phase II, randomized, open-label study was conducted between September 1999 and March 2001 at 14 investigative centers across the United States. Patients were randomized to receive tigecycline 25 or 50 mg IV q12h for 7 to 14 days. The primary efficacy end point was the clinically observed cure rate among clinically evaluable (CE) patients at the test-of-cure visit. Secondary end points were the clinical cure rate at the end of treatment and bacteriologic response in microbiologically evaluable (ME) patients. Also, in vitro tests of susceptibility to tigecycline were performed for selected pathogens known to cause skin infections, including methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible Streptococcus pyogenes, Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecalis, and Enterococcus faecium. Tolerability assessments also were conducted. RESULTS: A total of 160 patients received > or =1 dose of tigecycline; 109 patients were CE, and 91 were ME. The majority of patients (74%) were men, and the mean (SD) age was 49.0 (14.8) years. At the test-of-cure visit, the clinical cure rate in the 25-mg group was 67% (95% CI, 53.3%-79.3%) and in the 50-mg group was 74% (95% CI, 60.3%-85.0%). In the 25-mg group, 56% of the patients had eradication (95% CI, 40.0%-70.4%) of the pathogens compared with 69% (95% CI, 54.2%-82.3%) in the 50-mg group. Values for the minimum concentration of tigecycline that is inhibitory for 90% of all isolates ranged from 0.06 to 0.50 microg/mL for the selected pathogens. Both tigecycline doses were generally well tolerated. Nausea and vomiting were the most common adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, tigecycline appeared efficacious and showed a favorable pharmacokinetic profile and an acceptable safety profile in the treatment of hospitalized patients with cSSSI. In patients who received 50-mg doses of tigecycline q12h, the clinical cure rates and microbial eradication rates were 74% and 70%, respectively, and were 67% and 56% in patients who received 25-mg doses.     

Phase 2, randomized, dose-ranging study evaluating the safety and efficacy of anidulafungin in invasive candidiasis and candidemia

This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of anidulafungin, a novel echinocandin, in patients with invasive candidiasis, including candidemia. A total of 123 eligible patients were randomized to one of three intravenous regimens, 50, 75, or 100 mg once daily. Treatment continued for 2 weeks beyond resolution or improvement of signs and symptoms. The primary efficacy criterion was a successful global response rate (i.e., clinical and microbiological success) in the evaluable population at the follow-up (FU) visit, 2 weeks after end of therapy (EOT). One hundred twenty (120) patients received at least one dose of anidulafungin; 68 were evaluable. Review of adverse events and laboratory data indicated no dose response for safety parameters. Non-albicans Candida species accounted for approximately one-half of all isolates. Success rates at EOT were 84, 90, and 89% in the 50-, 75-, and 100-mg groups, respectively. At FU, the success rates were 72, 85, and 83%. Phase 3 studies of anidulafungin for the treatment of invasive candidiasis and candidemia are warranted.     

Single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of genistein capsules in healthy chinese subjects: A phase I, randomized, open-label study

Background: Genistein capsules are currently being developed to treat osteoporosis in China. Genistein is extracted from the fruit of Sophora japonica Leguminosae.Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the pharmacokinetics of genistein capsules after single and multiple oral doses in healthy Chinese subjects.Methods: This was a Phase I, randomized, open-label, single- and multiple- dose study in healthy Chinese adults (aged 19-40 years). In the single-dose study, subjects were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive genistein 50, 100, or 300 mg (in 50-mg capsules). To assess the effect of food on the pharmacokinetics, subjects in the 50-mg group were equally randomized again into fasting and postprandial (genistein was administered after a high-fat breakfast) groups according to a 2-way cross-over design. A separate equal-sized group of subjects were administered genistein 50 mg on day 1 (single dose), received no treatment on days 2 and 3, and were administered genistein 50 mg QD for 6 days (days 4-9) to obtain a multiple-dose pharmacokinetic profile. Because genistein is converted so rapidly and completely to glucuronidated genistein after administration, plasma concentrations of glucuronidated genistein were determined using a validated high-performance liquid chromatography/ tandem mass spectrometry method. Drug tolerability was assessed by monitoring adverse events (AEs) and laboratory parameters.Results: The study enrolled 40 healthy subjects (24 men, 16 women; 10 each in the 50-, 100-, and 300-mg single-dose groups and 10 in the multiple-dose group). Three subjects voluntarily withdrew (2 in the 100-mg group and 1 in the 300-mg group) before study drug administration. Thirty-seven subjects (24 men, 13 women) completed the study and were included in the analysis. The mean (SD) values of the single-dose genistein 50-, 100-, and 300-mg groups were as follows: T_max, 6.0 (2.4), 7.4 (2.4), and 5.6 (1.2) hours, respectively; t_l/2, 13.0 (4.0), 12.6 (5.8), and 9.4 (1.1) hours; AUC_0−t, 3344 (1635), 8389 (5164), and 9361 (2428) ng/mL · h⁻¹; and C_max , 218.7 (68.6), 435.7 (202.1), and 553.4 (152.8) ng/mL. The plasma glucuronidated genistein concentrations were directly proportional to the administered dose over the range of 50 to 100 mg and increased nonproportionately with the 300-mg dose. No statistically significant differences in pharmacokinetic parameters were found in the fasting group compared with the postprandial group. In the multiple-dose group, the mean (SD) steady-state pharmacokinetic parameters on day 9 were similar to those following a single dose of genistein on day 1 (T_max, 6.0 [1.0] vs 5.9 [1.5] hours, respectively; t_l/2, 9.5 [1.5] vs 9.1 [1.5] hours; AUC_0−t, 2830 [1541] vs 2078 [1308] ng/mL · h⁻¹; C_max, 203.1 [130.9] vs 168.4 [105.7] ng/mL). All AEs were assessed as mild or moderate and resolved without treatment, with the exception of elevated alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase activities in one subject that resolved with treatment.Conclusions: The pharmacokinetics of glucuronidated genistein appeared to fit the linear-dose range of genistein 50 to 100 mg, but not the 300-mg dose in these healthy Chinese volunteers. Food consumption did not significantly affect the pharmacokinetic properties. No significant differences were observed in the pharmacokinetic parameters after multiple doses of genistein compared with a single dose, suggesting that the drug did not accumulate after multiple doses.     

Phase IIa study of dabigatran etexilate in children with venous thrombosis: pharmacokinetics,safety, and tolerability

Essentials

• Dabigatran etexilate may provide a new treatment option for pediatric venous thromboembolism.
• Children aged 1 to < 12 years were given dabigatran etexilate in an open‐label, single‐arm study.
• The pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic relationship was similar to that seen in adult patients.
• There were no serious adverse events, bleeding events or recurrent venous thromboembolism.

Summary

Background

The current standard‐of‐care treatments for pediatric venous thromboembolism (VTE) have limitations. Dabigatran etexilate (DE), a direct thrombin inhibitor, may offer an alternative therapeutic option.

Objectives

To assess the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety, and tolerability of a DE oral liquid formulation (OLF) in pediatric patients with VTE.

Patients/Methods

Patients who had completed planned treatment with low molecular weight heparin or oral anticoagulants for VTE were enrolled in two age groups (2 to < 12 years and 1 to < 2 years), and received a DE OLF based on an age‐adjusted and weight‐adjusted nomogram. Originally, patients were to receive a DE OLF twice daily for 3 days, but the protocol was amended to a single dose on day 1. The primary endpoints were pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics‐related: plasma concentrations of DE and its metabolites; activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), ecarin clotting time (ECT), and dilute thrombin time (dTT); and pharmacokinetic (PK)–pharmacodynamic (PD) correlation. Safety endpoints included incidence rates of bleeding events and all other adverse events (AEs).

Results

Eighteen patients entered the study and received the DE OLF (an exposure equivalent to a dose of 150 mg twice daily in adults). The projected steady‐state dabigatran trough concentrations were largely comparable between pediatric patients and adults. The PK/PD relationship was linear for ECT and dTT, and non‐linear for APTT. No serious or severe AEs, bleeding events, or recurrent VTEs were reported. Mild AEs were reported in three patients in the single‐dose group (screening period) and in one patient in the multiple‐dose group (on‐treatment period).

Conclusion

The current study supports the further evaluation of DE OLFs in pediatric patients with VTE.     

Immune checkpoint inhibition in sepsis: a Phase 1b randomized study to evaluate the safety,tolerability, pharmacokinetics,and pharmacodynamics of nivolumab

Sepsis-associated immunosuppression increases hospital-acquired infection and viral reactivation risk. A key underlying mechanism is programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1)-mediated T-cell function impairment. This is one of the first clinical safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) assessments of the anti-PD-1 antibody nivolumab and its effect on immune biomarkers in sepsis. Randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, Phase 1b study in 31 adults at 10 US hospital ICUs with sepsis diagnosed ≥ 24 h before study treatment, ≥ 1 organ dysfunction, and absolute lymphocyte count ≤ 1.1 × 103 cells/μL. Participants received one nivolumab dose [480 mg (n = 15) or 960 mg (n = 16)]; follow-up was 90 days. Primary endpoints were safety and PK parameters. Twelve deaths occurred [n = 6 per study arm; 40% (480 mg) and 37.5% (960 mg)]. Serious AEs occurred in eight participants [n = 1, 6.7% (480 mg); n = 7, 43.8% (960 mg)]. AEs considered by the investigator to be possibly drug-related and immune-mediated occurred in five participants [n = 2, 13.3% (480 mg); n = 3, 18.8% (960 mg)]. Mean ± SD terminal half-life was 14.7 ± 5.3 (480 mg) and 15.8 ± 7.9 (960 mg) days. All participants maintained > 90% receptor occupancy (RO) 28 days post-infusion. Median (Q1, Q3) mHLA-DR levels increased to 11,531 (6528, 19,495) and 11,449 (6225, 16,698) mAbs/cell in the 480- and 960-mg arms by day 14, respectively. Pro-inflammatory cytokine levels did not increase. In this sepsis population, nivolumab administration did not result in unexpected safety findings or indicate any ‘cytokine storm’. The PK profile maintained RO > 90% for ≥ 28 days. Further efficacy and safety studies are warranted. NCT02960854.     

Phase 2, randomized, double-blind, dose-ranging study evaluating the safety, tolerability, population pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of oral torezolid phosphate in patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections

Torezolid (TR-700) is the active moiety of the prodrug torezolid phosphate ([TP] TR-701), a second-generation oxazolidinone with 4- to 16-fold greater potency than linezolid against Gram-positive species including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). A double-blind phase 2 study evaluated three levels (200, 300, or 400 mg) of oral, once-daily TP over 5 to 7 days for complicated skin and skin structure infections (cSSSI). Patients 18 to 75 years old with cSSSI caused by suspected or confirmed Gram-positive pathogens were randomized 1:1:1. Of 188 treated patients, 76.6% had abscesses, 17.6% had extensive cellulitis, and 5.9% had wound infections. S. aureus, the most common pathogen, was isolated in 90.3% of patients (139/154) with a baseline pathogen; 80.6% were MRSA. Cure rates in clinically evaluable patients were 98.2% at 200 mg, 94.4% at 300 mg, and 94.4% at 400 mg. Cure rates were consistent across diagnoses, regardless of lesion size or the presence of systemic signs of infection. Clinical cure rates in patients with S. aureus isolated at baseline were 96.6% overall and 96.8% for MRSA. TP was safe and well tolerated at all dose levels. No patients discontinued treatment due to an adverse event. Three-stage hierarchical population pharmacokinetic modeling yielded a geometric mean clearance of 8.28 liters/h (between-patient variability, 32.3%), a volume of the central compartment of 71.4 liters (24.0%), and a volume of the peripheral compartment of 27.9 liters (35.7%). Results of this study show a high degree of efficacy at all three dose levels without significant differences in the safety profile and support the continued evaluation of TP for the treatment of cSSSI in phase 3 trials.     

Effects of atorvastatin 10 mg and fenofibrate 200 mg on the low-density lipoprotein profile in dyslipidemic patients: A 12-week, multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group study

Background: Elevated plasma low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) concentrations are highly atherogenic, especially the small, dense LDL (sdLDL) species. Fenofibrate has been reported to shift the LDL profile by decreasing the sdLDL subfraction and increasing larger LDL subclasses. Atorvastatin, anantihyperlipidemic agent, has been reported to reduce plasma total cholesterol (TC) and triglyceride (TG) concentrations and thus could modify the LDL profile.Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of fenofi brate and atorvastatin on standard lipid concentrations and the LDL profile.Methods: In this randomized, open-label, parallel-group study, men and women aged 18 to 79 years with type II primary dyslipidemia, defined as LDL-C ≥160 and TG 150 to 400 mg/dL, after a 4- to 6-week washout period while eating an appropriate diet, were randomized to receive either atorvastatin 10 mg once daily or fenofi-brate 200 mg once daily. Plasma lipid concentrations and cholesterol and apolipoprotein (apo) B (reflecting the LDL particle number) in each LDL subfraction prepared by ultracentrifiigation were determined at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment. Tolerability was assessed using adverse events (AEs) obtained on laboratory analysis and vital sign measurement. Adherence was assessed by counting unused drug supplies.Results: A total of 165 patients (117 men, 48 women; mean [SD] age, 50.1 [10.7] years; mean TC concentration, 289 mg/dL) were randomized to receive atorvastatin (n = 81) or fenofibrate (n = 84). Compared with fenofibrate, atorvastatin was associated with a significantly greater mean (SD) percentage decrease in TC (27.0% [12.3%] vs 16.5% [12.9%]; P < 0.001), calculated LDL-C (35.4% [15.8%] vs 17.3% [17.2%]; P < 0.001), TC/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) ratio (29.1% [16.3%] vs 22.9% [15.9%]; P = 0.001), and apoB (30.3% [12.7%] vs 19.6% [15.5%]; P < 0.001). Compared with atorvastatin, fenofibrate was associated with a significantly greater decrease in TG (37.2% [25.9%] vs 20.2% [27.3%]; P < 0.001) and a significantly greater increase in HDL-C concentration (10.4% [15.7%] vs 4.6% [12.1%]; P = 0.017). Fibrinogen concentration was significantly different between the 2 groups (P = 0.002); it was decreased with fenofibrate use (4.6% [23.7%]) and was increased with atorvastatin use (5.7% [23.5%]). Atorvastatin did not markedly affect the LDL distribution; it was associated with a homogeneous decrease in cholesterol and apoB concentrations in all subfractions, whereas fenofibrate was associated with a marked movement toward a normalized LDL profile, shifting the sdLDL subfractions toward larger and less atherogenic particles, particularly in those patients with baseline TG ≥200 mg/dL. No serious AEs related to the study treatments were reported. A total of 5 AEs were observed in 8 patients, including: abdominal pain, 3 patients (2 in the atorvastatin group and 1 in the fenofibrate group); abnormal liver function test results, 1 (fenofibrate); increased creatine Phosphokinase activity, 2 (atorvastatin); gastrointestinal disorders, 1 (fenofibrate); and vertigo, 1 (fenofibrate).Conclusion: In these dyslipidemic patients, fenofibrate treatment was associated with an improved LDL subfraction profile beyond reduction in LDL-C, particularly in patients with elevated TG concentration, whereas atorvastatin was associated with equally reduced concentrations of cholesterol and apoB in all LDL subfractions independent of TG concentrations.     

The MANDELA study: A multicenter,randomized, open-label,parallel group trial to refine the use of everolimus after heart transplantation

In recent years a series of trials has sought to define the optimal protocol for everolimus-based immunosuppression in heart transplantation, with the goal of minimizing exposure to calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) and harnessing the non-immunosuppressive benefits of everolimus. Randomized studies have demonstrated that immunosuppressive potency can be maintained in heart transplant patients receiving everolimus despite marked CNI reduction, although very early CNI withdrawal may be inadvisable. A potential renal advantage has been shown for everolimus, but the optimal time for conversion and the adequate reduction in CNI exposure remain to be defined. Other reasons for use of everolimus include a substantial reduction in the risk of cytomegalovirus infection, and evidence for inhibition of cardiac allograft vasculopathy, a major cause of graft loss. The ongoing MANDELA study is a 12-month multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group study in which efficacy, renal function and safety are compared in approximately 200 heart transplant patients. Patients receive CNI therapy, steroids and everolimus or mycophenolic acid during months 3 to 6 post-transplant, and are then randomized at month 6 post-transplant (i) to convert to CNI-free immunosuppression with everolimus and mycophenolic acid or (ii) to continue reduced-exposure CNI, with concomitant everolimus. Patients are then followed to month 18 post-transplant The rationale and expectations for the trial and its methodology are described herein.     

Steady-state pharmacokinetics of once-daily cyclobenzaprine extended release: a randomized, double-blind, 2-period crossover study in healthy volunteers

BackgroundThe single-dose pharmacokinetic profile of cyclobenzaprine extended-release (CER) has been previously characterized and compared with the pharmacokinetics of cyclobenzaprine immediate-release (CIR) administered 3 times daily for 3 doses.ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to characterize the multiple-dose pharmacokinetic properties of once-daily CER 30 mg and CIR 10 mg TID formulations in healthy volunteers.MethodsIn this double-blind, single-center, 2-period crossover study, healthy subjects were randomized to dosing sequences with once-daily CER 30 mg or CIR 10 mg TID for 7 days. Subjects crossed over to the alternative regimen following a 14-day washout period. Pharmacokinetic assessments at steady state included area under the plasma cyclobenzaprine concentration–time curve over the dosing interval (AUC_0–τ,ss), peak plasma cyclobenzaprine concentration (C_max,ss), time to observed C_max (T_max,ss), observed minimum cyclobenzaprine concentration (C_min,ss), average cyclobenzaprine concentration (C_avg,ss), accumulation ratio (R_ac), and terminal elimination half-life (t_½). Tolerability and safety assessments were conducted.ResultsA total of 36 subjects were randomized; 34 completed both dosing periods (1 subject was lost to follow-up, 1 withdrew consent). Steady state was reached for CER 30 mg on day 7. Mean C_max,ss, C_min,ss, and C_avg,ss were 41.1, 21.4, and 31.4 ng/mL, respectively. The median T_max,ss for CER 30 mg was 7.0 hours, with a mean t_½ of 34.8 hours. At steady state, CER produced a sustained plasma cyclobenzaprine concentration with a single peak in plasma concentration during the 24-hour dose interval. The R_ac for CER was 2.65. Because of a protocol violation (insufficient data), no steady-state pharmacokinetic assessments could be performed for CIR. Most adverse events were mild or moderate in intensity. Somnolence was the most frequently reported adverse event (100% of subjects) in those receiving CER, followed by dry mouth (58%), dizziness (19%), and headache (17%).ConclusionsOnce-daily CER 30 mg delivered sustained plasma cyclobenzaprine levels over 24 hours at steady state. Owing to a protocol violation, steady-state pharmacokinetic properties for CIR could not be assessed.