Totally Laparoscopic Tube Graft Bypass for Infrarenal Aortic Aneurysm: a Well-Established Surgical Technique

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair enters the field of laparoscopic surgery. Main advantage of laparoscopic AAA repair is to perform the gold standard endoaneurysmorraphy with a reduced surgical trauma. Since 2001, the technique has evolved and is now well-established. We describe the standard technique of totally laparoscopic endoaneurysmorraphy with tube graft interposition through a transperitoneal left retrorenal approach. Main technical points are discussed.     

Laparoscopy-assisted aneurysm resection as a minimal invasive alternative in patients unsuitable for endovascular surgery

OBJECTIVE: So far, endovascular surgery has been the only minimal invasive way to treat patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). With hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS), laparoscopic transperitoneal endoaneurysm repair can be performed through a 6-cm mini-incision only. We wanted to evaluate whether this laparoscopic technique can be offered as a minimal invasive alternative in patients unsuitable for endovascular AAA repair. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty patients were referred for endovascular AAA repair. Three patients had to be excluded from the study. Endovascular AAA exclusion was finally performed in 13 patients. Laparoscopic AAA resection was performed in 24 patients. Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery with transperitoneal access and endoaneurysm repair was accomplished in all patients unsuitable for an endovascular procedure. The outcome after endovascular repair was compared with the outcome of patients who underwent laparoscopy. RESULTS: In the laparoscopic group, conversion to an open procedure was necessary in one case. One patient in this group died (4.1%) postoperatively. There were four complications in each group. In the endovascular group we had one endoleak type II and one graft thrombosis, which required a reoperation. After endovascular treatment, patients were transferred significantly less frequently to the intensive care unit, and they could resume oral feeding earlier. Mobilization and postoperative hospital stay did not differ significantly between the groups. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic AAA resection with the use of the technique described can be routinely offered to patients unsuitable for endovascular AAA exclusion with excellent long-term results similar to open surgery. A controlled study is clearly indicated to evaluate the role of laparoscopic techniques in aneurysm surgery.     

Delayed rupture of a postinfarction left ventricular true aneurysm

Delayed rupture of a true left ventricular aneurysm is a rare clinical condition. We report a case of a 60-year-old woman who underwent emergency surgical repair of a ruptured true aneurysm of the left ventricular inferior wall 3 months after the myocardial infarction. The repair consisted of endoaneurysmorraphy patch technique. The patient made a satisfactory recovery.     

Laparoscopically assisted abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

Background: Laparoscopic surgery decreases postoperative pain and length of hospital stay. Whether laparoscopically assisted abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair can be safely and reliably performed is unknown. This prospective study was designed to establish the feasibility of laparoscopically assisted AAA repair and its effects on intraoperative and postoperative variables. Methods: With IRB approval, 10 patients with infrarenal AAA requiring a tube graft underwent laparoscopically assisted AAA repair. The procedure consisted of laparoscopic dissection of the aneurysm neck and iliac vessels. Then, through an 8–11-cm minilaparotomy, a standard endoaneurysmorrhaphy was performed. Data included laparoscopic and total operative times, blood loss, fluid requirements, duration of nasogastric suction (NGT), and lengths of intensive care unit (ICU) and postoperative hospital stays. Results: Laparoscopically assisted AAA was completed in nine of 10 patients. The first patient was converted to a standard incision because the aneurysm neck could not be adequately dissected. Laparoscopic and total operative times were 1.8 ± 0.4 and 4.5 ± 0.7 h, respectively. Mean blood loss was 1 ± 0.6 l. Intraoperative fluid requirement was 6.6 ± 1.3 l. The duration of NGT suction was 1.8 ± 1.0 days. The ICU stay was 2.1 ± 0.8 days and hospital stay was 6.7 ± 2.5 days. There were two minor complications and no deaths. Conclusions: Laparoscopically assisted AAA repair is technically feasible with acceptable blood loss, operative time, morbidity, and mortality. Potential advantages may be early removal of the NGT and shorter ICU and hospital stays. Prospective randomized trials are needed to determine if laparoscopically assisted AAA repair is advantageous.     

Totally laparoscopic abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) resection is a major surgical procedure performed frequently. As a minimal access procedure, laparoscopy has been shown in the field of general surgery to improve a patient's postoperative well-being and to shorten hospital stay. The same benefits could be expected from a laparoscopic approach for AAA repair. We report what we believe to be the first totally laparoscopic AAA repair performed according to the principles of endoaneurysmorrhaphy.     

Abdominal aortic aneurysmorrhaphy and cholelithiasis in the era of endovascular surgery

The incidence of acute cholecystitis complicating standard abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair has been reported between 0.3 and 18 per cent. This has prompted considerable debate regarding the management of cholelithiasis discovered incidentally during open aortic reconstruction. This study seeks to determine the incidence of cholelithiasis and acute cholecystitis after endovascular AAA repair and evaluate options for management. Between February 1996 and October 2001 492 patients underwent endovascular AAA repair. All the procedures were performed in the operating room under fluoroscopic guidance. Epidural (98.9%), local (0.5%), or general (1.7%) anesthesia was used during these cases. The incidence of cholelithiasis and acute cholecystitis was evaluated by CT scan and abdominal ultrasound. Serum measurements of alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, total and direct bilirubin, and amylase were performed and clinical assessment was conducted at 1, 6, and 12 months postoperatively and annually thereafter. The mean age of these patients was 76.6 years; 84% were male. Comorbid medical conditions were present in all patients (average 3.5 conditions/patient). Follow-up ranged from 2 to 35 months (mean 12.8 months). Endovascular stent graft deployment was successful in 486 of the 492 patients (98.8%). Six patients were converted to standard open repair because of inability to achieve successful endovascular aneurysm repair. The perioperative major morbidity rate was 14.9 per cent. Minor morbidity rate was 8.5 per cent. The perioperative mortality rate was 1.9 per cent. No deaths were related to biliary disease. Cholelithiasis was identified in 64 (13%) patients preoperatively. One of 64 patients with a prior Billroth II reconstruction for peptic ulcer disease developed jaundice 8 days after AAA repair as a result of choledocholithiasis that required surgical repair. One patient without gallstones developed acute acalculous cholecystitis on postoperative day 16 as determined on pathologic analysis of the gallbladder. A third patient who had gallstones identified on preoperative CT scan developed calculous cholecystitis 16 months after endovascular AAA repair. These two patients underwent uncomplicated laparoscopic cholecystectomy and recovered uneventfully. The incidence of postoperative symptomatic cholelithiasis is 1.6 per cent (one of 64). The incidence of postoperative acute cholecystitis was 0.2 per cent (one of 486) and was unrelated to the presence of gallstones. The incidence of delayed symptomatic cholelithiasis was 1.6 per cent (one of 64). Endovascular repair of AAA does not appear to predispose the patient to the development of symptomatic cholelithiasis during the perioperative period. Therefore a preoperative or intraoperative diagnosis of cholelithiasis does not necessitate cholecystectomy in the setting of planned endovascular AAA repair. Patients who develop cholecystitis after endovascular AAA repair may be effectively treated by standard laparoscopic techniques.     

Early and late conversion from endoluminal to open repair.

Conversion from endoluminal to open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) may be primary, at the original operation or secondary, at a subsequent operation. The indications for primary conversion include aortic rupture and migration of an endograft resulting in obstructed blood flow and irreversible twisting of an endograft. The indications for secondary conversion include persistent endoleak, sealed endoleak with continued AAA expansion, apparently successful AAA repair, with continued expansion and the presence of an infected endograft. The technique of conversion varies from standard repair through modified standard repair to supraceliac control, depending on the cause of failure leading to conversion. All conversion procedures expose the patient to an increased risk and are best avoided by careful case selection, accurate sizing, and good procedural technique.     

An infected enlarging abdominal aortic aneurysm after acute cholecystitis

INTRODUCTIONAn abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) infection is rare and can be difficult to manage, with high morbidity and mortality. We present a patient who suffered an infected AAA after undergoing a laparoscopic cholecystectomy and discuss the surgical management options.PRESENTATION OF CASEA 69-year-old male presents with a rapidly enlarging AAA 4 weeks following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. He was managed with open debridement, washout and repair of the aneurysm, but suffered ongoing sequelae of Escherichia coli sepsis.DISCUSSIONThe options for surgical management of infected AAA include open, endovascular and combined approaches. Recent papers report successful use of endovascular repair of infected AAAs but this is an ongoing area of research.CONCLUSIONInfection of an AAA is associated with high mortality and long-term morbidity and requires optimal treatment. Surgical options include open debridement and repair, endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) or a combined approach.     

Minimal incision aortic surgery.

PURPOSE: In this study we evaluated the clinical and economic impact of minimal incision aortic surgery (MIAS) for treatment of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) and aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD). METHOD: Fifty patients with either AAA (34) or AIOD (16), prospectively treated with the MIAS technique, were compared with 50 patients (40 AAA and 10 AIOD) treated in the same time period with long midline incision and extracavitary small bowel retraction. MIAS was also compared with a cohort of 32 patients with AAA treated by means of endoaortic stent-grafts. Outcomes and cost (based on metric mean length of stay) were compared for the open and endoaortic techniques. RESULTS: Patients who experienced no perioperative complications after the MIAS or endovascular repair technique had shorter hospital stays than patients with uncomplicated aortic repairs performed with a traditional long midline abdominal incision (3 days vs 3 days vs. 7.2 days). Hospital stay was also significantly shorter for the less invasive procedures when perioperative complications were included (4.8 days vs. 4.3 days vs 9.3 days). The MIAS and endovascular aortic repair groups had a shorter intensive care unit stay (< or = 1.0 day) and a quicker return to general dietary feeding (2.5 days) than patients treated with standard open repair (1.8 days, 4.7 days). The overall morbidity for the MIAS technique (14%) and endovascular technique (21%) was not significantly different from standard open repair (24%). The mortality rate for the different treatment groups was equivalent (MIAS, 2%; endovascular repair, 3%; standard repair, 2%). The MIAS was more cost-efficient than standard open repair ($12,585 vs $18,445) because of shorter intensive care unit and hospital stay and was more cost-efficient than endoaortic repair ($12,585 vs $32,040) because of reduced, direct intraoperative costs. CONCLUSIONS: MIAS is as safe as standard open or endovascular repair in the treatment of AAA and AIOD. MIAS is more cost-efficient than standard open or endoaortic repair.     

Total laparoscopic infrarenal aortic aneurysm repair: preliminary results

OBJECTIVES: We describe our initial experience of total laparoscopic abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between February 2002 and September 2003, we performed 30 total laparoscopic AAA repairs in 27 men and 3 women. Median age was 71.5 years (range, 46-85 years). Median aneurysm size was 51.5 mm (range, 30-79 mm). American Society of Anesthesiologists class of patients was II, III and IV in 10, 19, and 1 cases, respectively. We performed total laparoscopic endoaneurysmorrhaphy and aneurysm exclusion in 27 and 3 patients, respectively. We used the laparoscopic transperitoneal left retrocolic approach in 27 patients. We operated on 2 patients via a tranperitoneal left retrorenal approach and 1 patient via a retroperitoneoscopic approach. RESULTS: We implanted tube grafts and bifurcated grafts in 11 and 19 patients, respectively. Two minilaparotomies were performed. In 1 case, exposure via a retroperitoneal approach was difficult and, in another case, distal aorta was extremely calcified. Median operative time was 290 minutes (range, 160-420 minutes). Median aortic clamping time was 78 minutes (range, 35-230 minutes). Median blood loss was 1680 cc (range, 300-6900 cc). In our early experience, 2 patients died of myocardial infarction. Ten major nonlethal postoperative complications were observed in 8 patients: 4 transcient renal insufficiencies, 2 cases of lung atelectasis, 1 bowel obstruction, 1 spleen rupture, 1 external iliac artery dissection, and 1 iliac hematoma. Others patients had an excellent recovery with rapid return to general diet and ambulation. Median hospital stay was 9 days (range, 8-37 days). With a median follow-up of 12 months (range, 0.5-20 months), patients had a complete recovery and all grafts were patent. CONCLUSION: These preliminary results show that total laparoscopic AAA repair is feasible and worthwhile for patients once the learning curve is overcome. However, prior training and experience in laparoscopic aortic surgery are needed to perform total laparoscopic AAA repair. Despite these encouraging results, a greater experience and further evaluation are required to ensure the real benefit of this technique compared with open AAA repair.     

Laparoscopic transperitoneal clipping of the inferior mesenteric artery for the management of type II endoleak after endovascular repair of an aneurysm

We report the case of a high risk patient with an abdominal infrarenal aortic aneurysm (AAA) who was treated by endovascular technique and the subsequent management of a type II endoleak by the laparoscopic approach. In this case, a 74-year-old woman with a 6-cm infrarenal AAA underwent endovascular repair using a bifurcated stent-graft device. Surveillance CT scan showed a persistent type II endoleak at 1 week and 3 months after the operation. Angiography confirmed retrograde flow from the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA). Attempted transarterial embolization of the IMA via the superior mesenteric artery was not successful. Laparoscopic transperitoneal IMA clipping was performed. Subsequent aortic duplex scan and CT scan confirmed complete elimination of the type II endoleak. We conclude that a combination of endovascular and laparoscopic procedures can be used to manage AAA successfully.     

True acquired left ventricular aneurysms in childhood

AIM: True left ventricular aneurysms are rarely encountered in childhood. Etiological factors are varied and often indeterminable. There is a paucity of literature detailing the surgical techniques used to repair pediatric aneurysms. METHODS: Three children aged 21 months, 19 months and 5 years with true left ventricular aneurysms underwent surgical repair in our unit. The clinical details, surgical technique, histological review, hospital outcome and short term follow-up is discussed. RESULTS: Two patients underwent repair of their aneurysms by means of the Cooley endoaneurysmorraphy technique, and 1 patient underwent repair using the aneurysm resection and linear plication technique. Histological examination revealed tuberculosis to be the etiological factor in one patient, while a non-specific vasculitis was present in the other 2 patients. Immediate postoperative course was uneventful and all 3 patients were discharged from hospital within one week. Two patients were recatheterized during follow-up visits. All patients were asymptomatic at 1 year follow-up. Echocardiography demonstrated good left ventricular function with disappearance of preoperative mitral regurgitation. CONCLUSION: Pediatric left ventricular aneurysms may be successfully repaired using standard operative techniques. These techniques render excellent short-term RESULTS: Longer follow-up is needed to fully evaluate the outcome of these children.     

Minimal incision abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

OBJECTIVE: The use of a limited incision for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair was evaluated, and its outcome was analyzed in comparison to standard open repair. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between February 2000 and August 2001, 20 patients with an AAA underwent minimal incision repair (MINI) for tube graft implantation. The minimal skin incision was made after localization of aneurysm neck and aortic bifurcation by CT and DSA. For repair of the upper part of the AAA the abdominal incision was retracted toward the head of the patient who was in a jackknife decubitus position. Conversely, when the peripheral portion of the AAA was treated, the abdominal incision was retracted caudally with the patient in a flat or slightly bent decubitus position. The operation itself was performed using the standard conventional technique. The length of the abdominal incision was 10 cm. Clinical characteristics and in-hospital outcome of this procedure were compared to a group of patients who underwent repair of AAA by means of a standard open technique (OPEN). RESULTS: Patients age in the MINI and OPEN groups were similar (69 +/- 11 vs. 69 +/- 9 years). However, there were significant differences between the MINI and OPEN groups in the time for starting oral intake of food (2,4 +/- 1,2 vs. 7,4 +/- 5,5 postoperative days, p = 0,003), time for starting to walk outside the room (2,2 +/- 0,7 vs. 4,6 +/- 2,2 postoperative days, p = 0,01) and operation times (197 +/- 37 vs. 294 +/- 83 min, p = 0,0004). CONCLUSION: Minimal incision repair is technically feasible and combines the benefits of a minimal incision with those of conventional open repair, reducing patient recovery time.     

Laparoscopically assisted abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: First 20 cases

Purpose: Laparoscopic surgery decreases postoperative pain, shortens hospital stay, and returns patients to full functional status more quickly than open surgery for a variety of surgical procedures. This study was undertaken to evaluate laparoscopic techniques for application to abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. Methods: Twenty patients who had AAAs that required a tube graft underwent laparoscopically assisted AAA repair. The procedure consisted of transperitoneal laparoscopic dissection of the aneurysm neck and iliac vessels. A standard endoaneurysmorrhaphy was then performed through a minilaparotomy using the port sites for the aortic and iliac clamps. Data included operative times, duration of nasogastric suction, intensive care unit days, and postoperative hospital days. Pulmonary artery catheters and transesophageal echocardiography were used in seven patients. For these patients data included heart rate, pulmonary artery systolic and diastolic pressures, mean arterial pressure, central venous pressure, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, cardiac index, and end diastolic area. Data were obtained before induction, during and after insufflation, during aortic cross-clamp, and at the end of the procedure. Results: Laparoscopically assisted AAA repair was completed in 18 of 20 patients. Laparoscopic and total operative times were 1.44 ± 0.44 and 4.1 ± 0.92 hours, respectively. Duration of nasogastric suction was 1.3 ± 0.7 days. Intensive care unit stay was 2.2 ± 0.9 days. The mean length of hospital stay was 5.8 days excluding three patients who underwent other procedures. There were two minor complications, one major complication (colectomy after colon ischemia), and no deaths. For the eight patients who had intraoperative transesophageal echocardiographic monitoring, no changes were noted in heart rate, pulmonary artery systolic pressure, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, and cardiac index. Pulmonary artery diastolic pressure and central venous pressure were greatest during insufflation without changes in end-diastolic area. Volume status, as reflected by end-diastolic area and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, did not change. Conclusions: Laparoscopically assisted AAA repair is technically challenging but feasible. Potential advantages may be early removal of nasogastric suction, shorter intensive care unit and hospital stays, and prompt return to full functional status. The hemodynamic data obtained from the pulmonary artery catheter and transesophageal echocardiogram during pneumoperitoneum suggest that transesophageal echocardiography may be sufficient for evaluation of volume status along with the added benefit of detection of regional wall motion abnormalities and aortic insufficiency. Further refinement in technique and instrumentation will make total laparoscopic AAA repair a reality. (J Vasc Surg 1998;27:81-8.)     

Total laparoscopic abdominal aortic aneurysms repair

AIM: The aim of the study was to describe our experience of total laparoscopic abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. METHODS: Between February 2002 and September 2004, we performed 49 total laparoscopic AAA repair in 45 men and 4 women. Median age was 73 years (range, 46-85 years). Median aneurysm size was 52 mm (range, 30-95 mm). ASA class of patients was II, III and IV in 16, 32 and 1 cases, respectively. We used the laparoscopic transperitoneal left retrocolic approach in 47 patients. Seven patients were operated via a tranperitoneal left retrorenal approach and one patient via a retroperitoneoscopic approach. RESULTS: We implanted tube grafts and bifurcated grafts in 19 and 30 patients, respectively. Median operative time was 290 min (range, 160-420 min). Median clamping time was 81.5 min (range, 35-230 min). Median blood loss was 1800 cc (range, 300-6900 cc). Mortality was 6.1% (3 patients). In our early experience, two patients died of myocardial infarction. The 3rd death was due to a multiple organ failure. Thirteen major non lethal postoperative complications were observed in 9 patients (18%). Four patients had local/vascular complications, which required reintervention (8%). Nasogastric tube is now removed at the end of procedure. Median duration of ileus, return to general diet, ambulation and hospital stay were 2, 3, 3 and 10 days. With a median follow-up of 19 months (range, 8-39 months), complete recovery with patent graft was observed in 44 patients. Two patients needed a crossover femoral graft for one iliac dissection and one graft limb occlusion. CONCLUSIONS: These results show that total laparoscopic AAA repair is feasible and worthwhile for patients once the learning curve is overcome. It remains technically demanding and a previous training in videoscopic sutures is essential. Initial learning curve in laparoscopic aortic surgery with aortoiliac occlusive lesions is preferable before to begin laparoscopic AAA repair.     

Laparoscopy-assisted abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: early and middle-term results of a consecutive series of 122 cases

BACKGROUND: Endoaneurysmorrhaphy with intraluminal graft placement, described by Creech, is the gold standard for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. Endovascular aneurysm repair has gained popularity for its minimal invasiveness and satisfying short-term results, but there are still many concerns about the long-term success of the procedure. Since 1998, laparoscopic surgery has been proposed for AAA treatment. The potential benefits of a minimally invasive procedure reproducing the endoaneurysmorrhaphy results over time have been advocated. In our experience, hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) has been routinely used for the open-surgery transperitoneal/retroperitoneal approach and for endovascular aneurysm repair. After 4 years, we are able to define the early and middle-term results of such laparoscopic-assisted treatment. METHODS: From October 2000 to March 2004, 604 consecutive nonurgent AAAs were treated at our institution. Of these, 122 (20.2%) were treated by HALS. Exclusion criteria for HALS were hostile abdomen (previous major abdominal or aortic surgery), bilateral diffuse common iliac and/or hypogastric aneurysms, massive aortoiliac calcifications, and severe cardiac (ejection fraction <35%) and respiratory (P(O2) <60 mm Hg or carbon dioxide >50 mm Hg) insufficiency. Juxtarenal and proximal iliac aneurysms were not a contraindication, nor was obesity. In all patients, we performed a minilaparotomy (7-8 cm) both for laparoscopic hand-assisted dissection and for endoaneurysmorrhaphy. All perioperative data were prospectively recorded. Follow-up consisted of ultrasonography and clinical evaluation after 6 and 12 months and then every year after surgery. RESULTS: The mean laparoscopic and total operative times were respectively 64 +/- 32 minutes and 257 +/- 70 minutes, the mean aortic cross-clamping time was 76 +/- 26 minutes, and the mean autotransfused blood volume was 1136 +/- 711 mL. The overall mortality and morbidity were respectively 0% and 12.2%. Morbidity was surgery related in only two cases (bleeding from an ipogastric artery lesion and a leg graft thrombosis). The mean intensive care unit stay was 14.3 +/- 13 hours. Oral food intake was resumed after 27.4 +/- 15 hours, and patients were discharged after a mean of 4.4 +/- 1.7 days. Operative times were not affected by obesity, suprarenal aortic cross-clamping, or aneurysm size. Both concomitant iliac aneurysms and bifurcated graft implantation (related to longer vascular reconstruction) involved significantly longer operative times. The learning curve of the procedure (comparing the first 30 patients with the last 92 patients) led to significantly shorter endoscopic, cross-clamping, and total operative times (P = .000). The mean follow-up was 28.6 +/- 16 months. Three incisional hernias and one case of bowel occlusion were detected. All these cases (3.4%) required laparoscopic treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The HALS technique is a safe and minimally invasive treatment for AAA; it is useful for limiting the need for conventional open surgery and reducing the length of hospital stay. Despite the lack of randomized studies, HALS seems to be associated with a better postoperative course than standard open surgery. HALS can also be considered as an equivalent of a well-established procedure and as a bridge between open and total laparoscopic surgery.     

Laparoscopic Repair of a Giant Hiatus Hernia—How I Do It

The laparoscopic approach is now the technique of choice for the repair of large hiatus hernia. It is associated with a low risk of complications. However, controversy exists as to the optimal technique for laparoscopic repair. In this paper, we describe our approach. This entails full dissection of the hernia sac from the mediastinum, hiatal repair with posteriorly placed sutures, and then construction of an appropriate fundoplication. Whether the use of mesh for hiatal repair will reduce the risk of subsequent reintervention and not add any new risks is, however, unclear. For this reason, we believe that the mesh should only be used in appropriately designed clinical trials, and for now, the standard approach to laparoscopic repair of a large hiatus hernia is sutured repair.     

Laparoscopic assisted aortic surgery. A review

We give an overview of different laparoscopic assisted techniques to perform aortic surgery. In a meta-analysis the paper describes the combined experience of two vascular surgical centers who together have performed more than 524 laparoscopic assisted aortic procedures. Basically the following techniques can be used to perform a laparoscopic assisted procedure: 1) transperitoneal approach (the Alimi procedure); 2) hand assisted laparoscopy (the Ferrari technique); 3) left retrocolic laparoscopic assisted; 4) combining laparoscopic assisted and total laparoscopy techniques. In all cases a transperitoneal approach was chosen to dissect the aorta. This was either accomplished directly or using a left retrocolic access originally described by Dion as the apron technique. In some cases a hand assist device was used, which permits the surgeon to introduce the non dominant hand while maintaining the pneumoperitoneum. The mortality in abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) patients in either center did not exceed 1.8%. ICU stay, postoperative ileus and length of stay were significantly shorter compared to patients with a full length incision. The Pisa group showed that there is still a significant reduction of operating time as well as aortic cross clamping time beyond the learning curve of the first 30 patients. The analysis of the pooled data shows that even in AAA patients the laparoscopic assisted procedure can be performed with operating times of less than 3 h and hospital stays up to 4 days, which we only know from endovascular aneurysm exclusion. This is the first publication of hand assisted laparoscopic endoaneurysm repair involving a large number of patients. The operations can be performed with expediency and safety. We can use these laparoscopic procedures to perform even complex aortic operations including suprarenal aneurysms with revascularization of the renal and visceral arteries. An outlook of future developments including stapling technology is given.     

Laparoskopische Aortenchirurgie

The following article describes our technique and results with total laparoscopic aortic aneurysm repair. A distinction must be made between laparoscopic-assisted procedures requiring a mini-incision to perform an anastomosis and total laparoscopic operations where the whole procedure is performed laparoscopically. In addition to aorto-femoral or ileo-femoral bypass procedures, total laparoscopic techniques can be used to perform abdominal aortic aneurysm resections. A transperitoneal left retrorenal access is preferred in most cases. Special laparoscopic clamps, often in combination with balloon catheters are used to occlude the aorta and if necessary the renal arteries. Exactly the same techniques as used in open surgery are transferred to a laparoscopic setting. Either a tube graft repair or a bifurcated graft anastomosed with the iliac bifurcation or the femoral artery is performed to exclude the aneurysm. Laparoscopic techniques can also be used to treat patients with type II endoleakage after EVAR or cases with endotension. Lumbar arteries or the IMA are clipped and if necessary downsizing of the aneurysm can be accomplished by opening the sac of the AAA, evacuating the thrombus material and stitching lumbar arteries from the inside. More recently laparoscopic techniques have been used to reduce the access trauma in debranching procedures. The learning curve of total laparoscopic aortic procedures is still steep, but new instruments, staplers or robotic devices will probably shorten this learning curve in the future. In an increasing number of European countries laparoscopic aortic surgery is becoming a third way to perform aortic repair. In contrast to EVAR it can offer to aneurysm patients the same definitive outcome and long lasting results as open surgery.     

Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: pros and cons compared with open hernia repair.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to analyse the surgical techniques, perioperative complications, and recurrence rate of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR), in comparison with the open ventral hernia repair (OVHR), based on the international literature. METHODS: A Medline search of the English literature was performed using the term "laparoscopic ventral hernia repair." Further articles were found by cross-referencing the references of each main article. RESULTS: Current literature on the topic suggests that LVHR is a safe alternative to the open method with the main advantages being minimal postoperative pain, a shorter convalescence period, and better cosmetic results. Main complications after the laparoscopic approach, such as incidental enterotomy, protracted pain, postoperative seroma, or mesh infection occur at an acceptable rate. Furthermore, most articles favor LVHR versus OVHR in terms of recurrence rate. CONCLUSIONS: Although further randomized studies are needed to draw safe conclusions in terms of complications and recurrence, LVHR is fast becoming the standard approach in the repair of abdominal wall hernias.