Tolfenamic acid and caffeine: A useful combination in migraine

Tolfenamic acid is a potent inhibitor of prostaglandin biosynthesis, which has been proved effective in the treatment of acute migraine attacks. The usefulness of caffeine, metoclopramide and pyridoxine as adjuncts to tolfenamic acid was tested in acute migraine attacks in ten patients. A combination of tolfenamic acid (200 mg) with either caffeine (100 mg), metoclopramide (10 mg) or pyridoxine (300 mg) was given twice to each patient in random order. Thus 60 attacks were treated. The tolfenamic acid-caffeine combination proved the most effective as judged by duration and intensity of attacks, working ability, vigilance, and overall evaluation of the drugs by the patients. Metoclopramide was somewhat better than pyridoxine as an additive.     

Safety and efficacy of combined lysine acetylsalicylate and metoclopramide: repeated intakes in migraine attacks

The efficacy of the combination of lysine acetylsalicylate and metoclopramide in the treatment of migraine attacks has been established previously. The value of repeated doses of such a combination has been reported in a recent study. The purposes of this open-label study performed by general practitioners on a very large sample of migraine sufferers were to confirm that repeated doses of the combined treatment are efficient and well-tolerated, and to assess the efficacy of treatment according to the initial headache intensity. Three thousand seven hundred twenty-seven general practitioners entered 7259 migraine sufferers. Patients had to use a first dose, the efficacy of which was assessed 2 hours later. In the case of failure, they were then able to take a second dose and possibly a third dose, 2 hours after the second, in the case of persistent failure. Twelve thousand five hundred sixty-two migraine attacks were analyzed. Tolerance, as assessed by the patients, was considered as good in more than 85% of attacks, whatever the number of doses utilized. Five hundred thirty-five adverse effects were reported after the use of 22,697 sachets. Of 12,515 attacks documented for efficacy, patients considered the treatment as good or excellent in 80% of attacks treated with one dose, 55% of those treated with two doses, and 27% of those treated with three doses. Relief of headache (reduction of its severity from grade 3 or 2 to 1 or 0) was observed in 51% of episodes after the first sachet, 51% of episodes treated with a second sachet, and 56% of episodes treated with a third sachet. The first dose of treatment was found to be more effective when the initial severity of the headache was moderate (improvement in 66% of attacks) than when it was severe (improvement in 30% of attacks). Efficacy appeared to increase according to the number of doses when headache was initially severe. This trial confirms that repeated doses of this combination is well-tolerated and effective. Our results show that repeated doses are particularly useful for severe attacks.     

Tolfenamic acid decreases migraine recurrence when used with sumatriptan

Although sumatriptan is an effective drug for the treatment of acute migraine attacks, recurrence has been cited as an important limitation for its use. Tolfenamic acid is also effective in the acute treatment of migraine attacks. We studied the recurrence rate of migraine attacks with the use of sumatriptan plus tolfenamic acid among patients who presented frequent recurrence with sumatriptan. Fifty migraineurs were retrospectively studied, all having treated at least 10 attacks with 100 mg P.O.; sumatriptan was effective in at least eight of them. The patients also presented recurrence in less than 24 h in at least five of the treated attacks. We then used sumatriptan 100 mg plus tolfenamic acid 200 mg P.O. during the first 60 min of the attack; 240 attacks were treated and there was recurrence in 57 (23.8%). With sumatriptan alone, 5 out of 8 attacks (62.5%) presented recurrence. We therefore conclude that the combination sumatritpan plus tolfenamic acid is effective in reducing the recurrence rate from 5 of 8 (62.5%) to 1.19 of 5 (23.8%). Further prospective studies with a double-blind design and a higher number of treated attacks are necessary to confirm these initial observations.     

Effervescent metoclopramide and aspirin (Migravess) versus effervescent aspirin or placebo for migraine attacks: a double-blind study

Aspirin 650 mg and metoclopramide 10 mg in an effervescent preparation (Migravess) were compared with effervescent aspirin 650 mg (Alka-Seltzer) and placebo for common migraine attacks with a double-blind cross-over design. One hundred and eighteen patients with common migraine were entered. Eighty-five patients completed all three forms of treatment, eleven completed two, and six completed one. Medicine was taken when patients were sure they had a migraine attack and not just interval headache. After each form of treatment, they mailed a report form to the investigators. Additional medication was allowed after 2 h and was taken for 79/95 placebo treated attacks, 63/92 Migravess treated attacks, and 51/86 aspirin treated attacks (p less than 0.01). Aspirin was significantly better than placebo for pain but not quite significant for nausea. Migravess was significantly better than placebo for pain and for nausea. There was no significant difference between aspirin and Migravess with regard to analgesic effectiveness (p = 0.33) or to antinausea effect (p = 0.18).     

Combined oral lysine acetylsalicylate and metoclopramide in the acute treatment of migraine: a multicentre double-blind placebo-controlled study

This multicentre, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of combined oral lysine acetylsalicylate and metoclopramide (LAS-MCP) in the acute treatment of migraine attacks. A total of 266 patients, 18–65 years old, with two to six attacks of migraine with or without aura (IHS criteria) per month were included. The patients had to treat two migraine attacks with LAS-MCP (1620 mg lysine acetylsalicylate-the equivalent of 900 mg aspirin- combined with 10 mg metoclopramide) or placebo. The main outcome measure was headache relief (reduction in headache severity from grade 3 or 2-severe or moderate-to grade 1 or 0-mild or none) 2 h after treatment. LAS-MCP was superior to placebo for headache relief (56% vs 28%) and for the following secondary outcome measures: complete headache relief (18% vs 7%; p < 0.001), nausea (28% vs 44%; p < 0.001), vomiting (3% vs 11%; p = 0.001), use of rescue medication (47% vs 68%; p < 0.001), global efficacy judged as good or excellent (32% vs 14%; p < 0.001). The tolerability was considered as good in 94% of treated attacks in both groups. Combined oral lysine acetylsalicylate and metoclopramide is an effective and well-tolerated acute treatment of migraine attacks.     

Efficacy of a fixed combination of indomethacin,prochlorperazine, and caffeine versus sumatriptan in acute treatment of multiple migraine attacks: a multicenter,randomized, crossover trial

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of a fixed combination of indomethacin, prochlorperazine, and caffeine suppositories with sumatriptan suppositories in the treatment of 2 consecutive migraine attacks of moderate or severe intensity in a multicenter, randomized, crossover study. BACKGROUND: A fixed combination of indomethacin, prochlorperazine, and caffeine is the most commonly used drug for the acute treatment of migraine in Italy. No studies have been published comparing the efficacy of this combination with sumatriptan, the most widely prescribed of the triptans. METHODS: One hundred twelve patients with migraine with or without aura according to the diagnostic criteria of the International Headache Society were randomized to treat 2 migraine attacks with a fixed combination of indomethacin, prochlorperazine, and caffeine and 2 migraine attacks with sumatriptan. Both drugs were rectally administered in a single dose for each attack. Patients were asked to take study medication as soon as possible at the onset of a headache. RESULTS: Of the 112 patients, 88 were compliant to the protocol. More attacks became pain-free at 2 hours postdose (primary end point) on the combination than on sumatriptan (49% versus 34%; P<.01), while there was no difference in the relief of headache at 2 hours postdose (71% versus 65%). The combination was statistically superior to sumatriptan in the time to a pain-free response (a higher percentage of attacks became pain-free from 0.5 hours postdose to 5 hours postdose), in alleviation of nausea, and in a sustained pain-free response (pain-free at 2 hours postdose with no use of rescue medication or relapses within 48 hours). Moreover, a significant consistent response was achieved for the combination compared with sumatriptan across (higher percentage of patients pain-free at 2 hours postdose in the first, second, third, and fourth treated attack) and within patients (pain-free in 2 of 2 treated attacks in 35% of patients taking the combination and 20% of patients on sumatriptan). Both drugs were well-tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: This study, analyzed according to the more recent guidelines for controlled trials in migraine, showed that a fixed combination of indomethacin, prochlorperazine, and caffeine is significantly more effective than sumatriptan in the acute treatment of migraine attacks. It is notable that the combination is less expensive than sumatriptan per unit dose.     

Comparison of intravenous valproate versus intramuscular dihydroergotamine and metoclopramide for acute treatment of migraine headache

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness and tolerability of intravenous valproate for the acute treatment of migraine headache with or without aura (International Headache Society diagnostic criteria 1.1 and 1.2) compared with intramuscular metoclopramide 10 mg followed 10 minutes later by intramuscular dihydroergotamine 1 mg. BACKGROUND: Divalproex sodium is approved for prophylaxis of migraine headache. We studied the possible effectiveness of intravenous sodium valproate for the treatment of acute migraine headache. Valproate offers a treatment option for patients with migraine who recently have used a triptan or dihydroergotamine, theoretically avoiding the risk of drug interactions or cardiovascular complications. DESIGN/METHODS: In an open-label randomization, patients with an established diagnosis of migraine with or without aura were administered either intravenous valproate or intramuscular dihydroergotamine with metoclopramide to treat moderate-to-severe migraine headache of 24 to 96 hours' duration. Forty patients alternately received either 500 mg intravenous valproate or 10 mg metoclopramide intramuscularly followed by 1 mg dihydro- ergotamine. Patients rated severity of headache and the presence or absence of nausea, photophobia, or phonophobia at baseline, and at 1, 2, 4, and 24 hours. RESULTS: With intravenous valproate, 50% of patients reported headache improvement from moderate or severe to none or mild at 1 hour following treatment, 60% reported such improvement at 2 hours, 60% at 4 hours, and 60% at 24 hours. Corresponding improvement rates for dihydroergotamine were 45% at 1 hour, 50% at 2 hours, 60% at 4 hours, and 90% at 24 hours. Intravenous valproate and intramuscular dihydroergotamine provided similar relief from associated migrainous symptoms (nausea, photophobia, and phonophobia) during the first 4 hours following treatment. While none of the patients who received intravenous valproate experienced drug-related side effects during treatment, 15% of patients who took dihydroergotamine experienced one or more episodes of nausea and diarrhea during the first 4 hours of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous valproate is similar in effectiveness to dihydroergotamine/metoclopramide as abortive therapy for prolonged moderate-to-severe acute migraine headache. Although the results were not statistically significant (P =.3635), intravenous valproate appears to offer a safe, effective, and well-tolerated treatment for patients with acute migraine. Relative to dihydroergotamine/metoclopramide, however, headache relief was not as likely to be sustained at 24 hours as with intravenous valproate.     

A randomized prospective placebo-controlled study of intravenous magnesium sulphate vs. metoclopramide in the management of acute migraine attacks in the Emergency Department

The objective of this randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study was to determine the effectiveness of intravenous magnesium sulphate and intravenous metoclopramide in the treatment of acute migraine attacks in the Emergency Department when compared with placebo. Adult patients who presented to the Emergency Department with a headache that met International Headache Society (IHS) criteria for acute migraine were infused with either 10 mg of intravenous metoclopramide, 2 g of intravenous magnesium sulphate or normal saline over 10 min. At 0, 15, and 30 min, patients were asked to rate their pain on a standard visual analogue scale. At 30 min, patients were asked in a standard manner about the need for rescue medication. Adverse affects were also recorded. Patients were followed up by telephone within 24 h for any recurrence after discharge. The primary endpoint of the study was the difference in pain relief between the groups at 30 min. Of the 120 patients who met IHS criteria, seven were excluded from the study due to insufficient data. The number of patients, gender, age and initial visual analogue scale (VAS) scores were comparable between groups. Each group experienced more than a 25-mm improvement in VAS score at 30 min. However, there was no significant difference detected in the mean changes in VAS scores for pain. The rescue medication requirement was higher in the placebo group. The recurrence rate in 24 h was similar between the groups. Although patients receiving placebo required rescue medication more than the others, metoclopramide and magnesium have an analgesic effect similar to placebo in migraine attacks.     

Recurrent syncope, hypotension, asthma, and migraine with aura: role of metoclopramide

Migraine associated with asthma or symptomatic orthostatic hypotension is a particularly difficult subgroup to manage. Metoclopramide is a useful pharmacological agent for orthostatic hypotension. I present the case report of a migraine patient with asthma and recurrent hypotensive syncope. Metoclopramide relieved recurrent syncope as well as migraine attacks in this patient. Metoclopramide has a striking influence on arginine vasopressin (AVP) secretion. AVP promotes antinociception and influences vasomotor and behavior control, which actions possibly keep migraine in remission. Further studies are necessary to confirm the migraine prophylactic value of metoclopramide.     

Tolfenamic Acid Rapid Release Versus Sumatriptan in the Acute Treatment of Migraine: Comparable Effect in a Double-Blind, Randomized, Controlled, Parallel-Group Study

The efficacy and safety of tolfenamic acid and oral sumatriptan in the acute treatment of migraine was studied at five neurological centers in Finland. One hundred forty-one patients experiencing 289 migraine attacks, fulfilling the diagnostic criteria for migraine with or without aura as defined by the International Headache Society, were randomized.
For first attacks, 77% of patients receiving tolfenamic acid experienced a reduction of the initial severe or moderate headache to mild or no headache after 2 hours, as compared to 79% in the sumatriptan group and 29% in the placebo group. No significant difference was found between active treatments ( P =0.85, 95% Cl [−22%, 18%]), however, both active treatments were significantly better than placebo; P =0.001, 95% Cl (26%, 69%) for tolfenamic acid and P =0.001, 95% Cl (28%, 71%) for sumatriptan. For second attacks, results were similar with 70% of patients receiving tolfenamic acid experiencing relief, as compared to 64% in the sumatriptan group and 39% in the placebo group.
No significant differences were observed in accompanying symptoms.
Both drugs were well tolerated with the frequency of adverse events; 30% for tolfenamic acid and 41% for sumatriptan, a nonsignificant difference.
In this study, tolfenamic acid and oral sumatriptan are comparably effective in the acute treatment of migraine. When comparably effective, factors like individual effect, tolerance, and cost of treatment should be considered when prescribing migraine medication.     

Neuroexcitatory amino acid levels in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid during migraine attacks

A current hypothesis for migraine suggests that neuroexcitatory amino acids may participate in the triggering of attacks. To investigate this possibility we measured glutamic and aspartic acid level in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of patients with common and classic migraine during attacks, making comparisons with controls suffering from stress. Plasma levels of amino acids in migraine patients were lower than in controls. CSF concentrations of glutamic acid were higher in migraineurs than in controls. Our results suggest an excess of neuroexcitatory amino acids in the CNS of migraine patients during attacks, possibly favoring a state of neuronal hyperexcitability.     

Aspirin treatment of migraine attacks: clinical observations

A retrospective study of the efficacy of soluble aspirin in migraine has been carried out. Data were available for 6l patients. These patients differed in only relatively minor ways from the remainder of the population of migraine sufferers referred to a neurological consultative practice. Soluble aspirin usually or always relieved migraine attacks in 44% of these patients, and sometimes relieved the disorder in another 25%. Adverse effects, mainly nausea and vomiting, were reported by 16% of patients only, and in some cases nausea and vomiting may have been due to migraine rather than to the drug. Response to aspirin was unrelated to factors such as the patient's age, sex and duration of migraine history, and to the severity of migraine or occurrence of nausea and vomiting during attacks. However, the presence of a migraine aura appeared to improve the chances of a response to aspirin. The aura may have permitted earlier recognition that migraine was present, and thus allowed earlier aspirin intake at a stage when it had a better chance of influencing migraine mechanisms.     

Acetaminophen, aspirin, and caffeine in combination versus ibuprofen for acute migraine: results from a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, single-dose, placebo-controlled study

OBJECTIVE: Compare the effectiveness of a combination analgesic containing acetaminophen, aspirin, and caffeine to that of ibuprofen in the treatment of migraine. METHODS: Multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, single-dose study. A total of 1555 migraineurs were included in the analysis. No patients were excluded solely because of severity of symptoms or degree of disability. A single 2-tablet dose for each of the 3 treatment groups: a combination product containing acetaminophen 250 mg, aspirin 250 mg, and caffeine 65 mg per tablet (AAC); ibuprofen 200 mg per tablet (IB); or matching placebo. The primary efficacy endpoint was the weighted sum of pain relief (PAR) scores at 2 hours postdose (TOTPAR2) and an important secondary endpoint was the time to onset of meaningful relief. RESULTS: There were 669 patients in the AAC group, 666 patients in the IB group, and 220 patients in the placebo group. The 3 treatment groups had similar demographic profiles, migraine histories, and baseline symptom profiles. While both active treatments were significantly better than placebo in relieving the pain and associated symptoms of migraine, AAC was superior to IB for TOTPAR2, as well as for PAR, time to onset of meaningful PAR, pain intensity reduction, headache response, and pain free. The mean TOTPAR2 scores for AAC, IB, and placebo were 2.7, 2.4, and 2.0, respectively (AAC vs. IB, P < .03). The median time to meaningful PAR for AAC was 20 minutes earlier than that of IB (P < .036). CONCLUSION: AAC and IB are safe, cost-effective treatments for migraine; AAC provides significantly superior efficacy and speed of onset compared with IB.     

Efficacy of diclofenac sodium softgel 100 mg with or without caffeine 100 mg in migraine without aura: a randomized, double-blind, crossover study

OBJECTIVE: A phase II, randomized, double-blind, crossover study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of 100-mg diclofenac sodium softgel (formulated using ProSorb technology) with or without 100-mg caffeine versus placebo in migraineurs during migraine attacks. BACKGROUND: Diclofenac has been demonstrated to be an effective migraine treatment in several placebo-controlled studies. A rapidly absorbed softgel of diclofenac has been shown to be effective in the rapid relief of acute pain, and may have advantages in migraine treatment. In addition, caffeine has consistently been shown to increase both the efficacy and speed of onset of concurrently administered analgesics. The ability of caffeine to both enhance and accelerate analgesic effects has been documented with a variety of different medications (ie, aspirin, acetaminophen, ibuprofen, and ergotamine). METHODS: The 3-period crossover study was designed to compare diclofenac softgel 100 mg, diclofenac softgel 100 mg plus caffeine 100 mg, and placebo in the acute treatment of migraine. Subjects treated one moderate or severe attack with each study medication. The primary efficacy parameter was the percentage of subjects with headache relief at 60 minutes as defined by a reduction of headache severity from moderate or severe at baseline to absent or mild compared with placebo. Though the sample size estimate required that 72 subjects treat 3 separate attacks, 51 subjects treated 1 migraine attack, 44 treated 2 attacks, and 39 treated 3 attacks. Results.-In the placebo group, 6 (14%) of 43 subjects reported headache relief at 60 minutes versus 12 (27%) of 45 subjects in the diclofenac softgel group, and 19 (41%) of 46 subjects in the diclofenac softgel plus caffeine group. Differences were statistically significant for the diclofenac softgel plus caffeine group versus placebo (odds ratio, 4.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.3 to 13.7). Rescue medication was used by 27 (63%) of 43 subjects treated with placebo, 15 (33%) of 45 subjects treated with diclofenac softgel, and 14 (30%) of 46 subjects treated with diclofenac softgel plus caffeine. This result is highly statistically significant (chi22= 11.56, P=.003). Both the diclofenac plus caffeine (P <.03) and diclofenac only (P <.03) groups were significantly different from the placebo group in terms of the visual analog scale score at 60 minutes. CONCLUSIONS: The major finding of the present study is that diclofenac softgel plus caffeine produces statistically significant benefits relative to placebo at 60 minutes. Diclofenac softgel alone did not differ significantly from placebo, perhaps due to limits in sample size. Nonsignificant trends support the analgesic adjuvant benefit of caffeine when added to diclofenac softgels.     

Finding new drug targets for the treatment of migraine attacks

No new preventive drugs specific to migraine have appeared for the last 20 years and existing acute therapies need improvement. Unfortunately, no animal models can predict the efficacy of new therapies for migraine. Because migraine attacks are fully reversible and can be aborted by therapy, the headache- or migraine-provoking property of naturally occurring signalling molecules can be tested in a human model. This model has predicted efficacy of nitric oxide synthase inhibition and calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor blockade. The pharmaceutical industry should pay more attention to human models, although methods are different from normal target validation.     

Weekend attacks in migraine patients: caused by caffeine withdrawal?

The principal reasons for a predominantly weekend incidence of migraine attacks are likely to be social or psychological in origin. There may be another factor. This study examines the use, and more importantly the way of use, of caffeine containing substances. We collected data by questionnaire from 151 consecutive Migraine Clinic patients with the diagnosis of migraine or tension type headache. Of the whole group, 21.9% claimed to have weekend attacks, with relatively more males than females. The males amongst these were all migraine patients, but 23% of the women suffered from tension-type headache. Patients with both a high daily caffeine intake and excessively delayed wakening at weekends (each defined as greater than the mean for the whole group) had a 69% risk of weekend headache. This compared with 4% in patients exceeding the mean in one only, and zero in those with moderate habits in both. These results support the idea that weekend attacks are linked to caffeine withdrawal. Sleeping in is not on its own a significant cause. We suggest that this possibility should be considered in clinical management of affected patients.     

A double-blind study of ibuprofen versus placebo in the treatment of acute migraine attacks

The efficacy of ibuprofen, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, was assessed in the acute treatment of migraine. Twenty-five patients completed a double-blind placebo-controlled multicrossover trial. The initial dose of ibuprofen was 1200 mg. Six migraine attacks were randomly treated in each patient, three with ibuprofen and three with placebo. The results indicated a statistically significant reduction in the duration of the migraine attacks and also a statistically significant reduction in the severity of headache and nausea in the ibuprofen-treated attacks. The use of additional medication was significantly reduced in the ibuprofen-treated attacks (25.6% vs 57.5%). No serious side effects were reported. Ibuprofen is valuable in the treatment of acute migraine attacks.