Labor induction in women with an unfavorable Bishop score: randomized controlled trial of intrauterine Foley catheter with concurrent oxytocin infusion versus Foley catheter with extra-amniotic saline infusion with concurrent oxytocin infusion

OBJECTIVES: This study was undertaken to determine whether the addition of extra-amniotic saline infusion improves the efficacy of the Foley catheter in women undergoing cervical ripening and induction of labor with an unfavorable cervical examination. STUDY DESIGN: One hundred consenting women with a Bishop score less than 5 with singleton gestation, intact membranes, vertex presentation, who required induction of labor were randomly assigned to 2 groups: Foley alone (Foley, n=49) or to the Foley catheter with extra-amniotic saline infusion (EASI, 30 mL of NS per hour infused through the distal port of the Foley, n=51). All women received concurrent dilute oxytocin infusion per protocol. The primary analysis was intent to treat. Nonparametric tests were used as indicated. RESULTS: At randomization, the groups were well balanced for potential confounders including: parity, gestational age, prior cesarean delivery, preeclampsia, mean dilation, effacement, and Bishop score. There were no differences between the groups for time to delivery (Foley 17.7 +/- 10.5 hours vs EASI 17.4 +/- 11.7 hours, P=.9), the proportion of women delivered before 24 hours (Foley 41/49 [84%] vs EASI 39/51 [77%], P=.37) or cesarean rates (Foley 9/49 [17.7%] vs EASI 9/51 [18.4%], P=.92). There were also no differences in complications, including chorioamnionitis, endometritis, and neonatal morbidity. CONCLUSION: EASI does not increase the efficacy of cervical ripening and induction of labor with a Foley catheter and concurrent oxytocin infusion.     

A randomized comparison of transcervical Foley catheter to intravaginal misoprostol for preinduction cervical ripening

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of intravaginal misoprostol tablets with transcervical Foley catheter for preinduction cervical ripening. METHODS: Pregnant women who presented for induction of labor with unfavorable cervices (Bishop score less than 6) were assigned randomly to intravaginal misoprostol (50 microg tablet every 4 hours for a maximum of six doses) or 30-mL Foley catheter placed transcervically with maintenance of traction. RESULTS: Among 111 women, 53 were allocated to misoprostol and 58 to Foley bulb. Contractile abnormalities were more frequent in the misoprostol group (20.4%) than the Foley group (0%) (P <.001). No statistically significant differences were noted between groups in change in Bishop score, preinduction cervical ripening times, and total induction times. There were no statistically significant differences in mode of delivery or adverse neonatal outcomes. Uterine rupture occurred in one woman with two previous cesarean deliveries in the misoprostol group. CONCLUSION: Intravaginal misoprostol and transcervical Foley catheter are equivalent for cervical ripening. Uterine contractile abnormalities and meconium passage are more common with misoprostol.     

A randomized trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter with concurrent oxytocin for labor induction in nulliparous women

The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of intracervical Foley catheter with concurrent use of oxytocin versus vaginal misoprostol for labor induction in nulliparous women. Nulliparous women with Bishop score <6 who presented for labor induction were randomized to either 25 microg vaginal misoprostol every 4 hours followed by oxytocin, if indicated, or intracervical Foley catheter with simultaneous use of oxytocin. Among the 162 patients enrolled, 79 (49%) received misoprostol and 83 (51%) received Foley/oxytocin. We were unable to demonstrate a statistically significant difference between the misoprostol group and Foley/oxytocin group in the incidence of cesarean delivery (35% versus 29%; p = 0.37). The induction-to-delivery time was significantly shorter in the Foley/oxytocin group (18 versus 24 hours; p < 0.01). No differences in intrapartum complications, neonatal outcomes, or maternal morbidity were found. When compared with vaginal misoprostol, intracervical Foley catheter combined with oxytocin has a similar efficacy and safety profile for labor induction in nulliparous women. Foley/oxytocin results in a shorter induction-to-vaginal delivery time compared with misoprostol.     

Comparison of extraamniotic Foley catheter and intracervical prostaglandin E gel for preinduction cervical ripening

BACKGROUND: The success of induced labor depends on the degree of ripening of cervix. Pharmacological preparations are in widespread use for cervical ripening but are not free from side-effects and complications. Mechanical methods, i.e. the use of Foley catheter balloon, though effective have not gained much popularity because of the fear of infection. Therefore, this study has been conducted to prove the efficacy and safety of extraamniotic Foley catheter balloon and to compare it with intracervical prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) gel. METHODS: The randomized prospective study was conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Medical Microbiology of Nehru Hospital. Hundred women attending the labor ward for induction of labor were divided into two groups: Group A--Foley catheter, Group B--PGE2 gel. Cervical swabs before and after the insertion of ripening agents were taken for culture studies. Placental membranes were also sent for culture. Labor outcome, side-effects, and complications were compared in both the groups. The statistical methods used were Student's compared t-test, Chi-square test, and Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test. RESULTS: Foley catheter proved to be a very effective preinduction ripening agent for unfavorable cervix compared with PGE2 gel, as is evident by the mean Bishop score at 12 h (P<0.001). Preparation delivery interval was significantly shorter (P<0.05) in women who underwent cervical ripening with Foley catheter balloon than with the PGE2 gel. No clinical evidence of chorioamnionitis was present in both the groups. CONCLUSION: This study concludes that extraamniotic Foley catheter balloon is an effective, safe, simple, low-cost, reversible, non-pharmacological mechanical method of preinduction cervical ripening.     

Cervical ripening with transcervical foley catheter and the risk of uterine rupture

OBJECTIVE: To estimate whether the rate of uterine rupture in patients with a previous cesarean delivery is related to labor induction and/or cervical ripening using transcervical Foley catheter. METHODS: Charts of all patients who had a trial of labor after a previous cesarean delivery in our institution between 1988 and 2002 were reviewed. The rates of successful vaginal birth after cesarean delivery and uterine rupture in patients with spontaneous labor (control group) were compared with those of patients who underwent a labor induction by means of amniotomy with or without oxytocin and patients who underwent a labor induction/cervical ripening using a transcervical Foley catheter. Logistic regression analysis was performed to adjust for confounding variables. RESULTS: Of 2479 patients, 1807 had a spontaneous labor, 417 had labor induced by amniotomy with or without oxytocin, and 255 had labor induced by using transcervical Foley catheter. The rate of successful vaginal birth after cesarean delivery was significantly different among the groups (78.0% versus 77.9% versus 55.7%, P <.001), but not the rate of uterine rupture (1.1% versus 1.2% versus 1.6%, P =.81). After adjusting for confounding variables, the odds ratio (OR) for successful vaginal birth after cesarean delivery was 0.68 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.41, 1.15), and the OR for uterine rupture was 0.47 (95% CI 0.06, 3.59) in patients who underwent an induction of labor using a transcervical Foley catheter when compared with patients with spontaneous labor. CONCLUSION: Labor induction using a transcervical Foley catheter was not associated with an increased risk of uterine rupture.     

Transcervical Foley catheter with and without oxytocin for cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: To estimate whether adding oxytocin to transcervical Foley catheter preinduction cervical ripening improves induction success. METHODS: This trial enrolled 200 women with singleton pregnancies presenting for preinduction ripening. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either Foley catheter alone (control) or Foley catheter plus low-dose oxytocin (treatment). Providers were not blinded to use of oxytocin, and labor was managed according to routine obstetric protocols. This study was powered to detect a 20% difference in the proportion of patients delivered within 24 hours. Secondary outcomes were related to vaginal delivery rate, duration of induction, complications, and pain management. RESULTS: Results were available for 183 (92 treatment, 91 control) of 200 patients randomly assigned. There were no differences in proportions of deliveries-overall (65% compared with 60%; relative risk [RR] 1.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.86-1.35, number needed to treat 21) or vaginal (48% compared with 46%; RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.76-1.41, number needed to treat 60)-in 24 hours, or cesarean deliveries or times to deliveries between treatment or control groups. Rates of complications were comparable; however, the treatment group had a higher proportion of regional analgesia requirement during induction than controls (23% compared with 9%, P=.01; RR 2.60, 95% CI 1.21-5.56). CONCLUSION: Addition of oxytocin to transcervical Foley catheter does not shorten the time to delivery and has no effect on the likelihood of delivery within 24 hours or vaginal delivery rate, although there is an increased use of analgesia by these patients during ripening. The use of oxytocin in addition to Foley catheter ripening is not justified. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00468520. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.     

Extra-amniotic saline, laminaria, or prostaglandin E(2) gel for labor induction with unfavorable cervix: a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: To determine which of three methods of cervical ripening resulted in the lowest cesarean rate in women with unfavorable cervices and indications for labor induction. METHODS: Consenting women with singleton gestations, vertex presentations, and unfavorable cervices (dilatation under 2 cm and effacement under 75%) were randomly assigned to laminaria and standard intravenous oxytocin, serial doses of intracervical prostaglandin (PG) E(2) gel (Prepidil, Pharmacia & Upjohn, Inc., Kalamazoo, MI) 0.5 microg every 6 hours for two doses followed by oxytocin if indicated, or extra-amniotic saline infusion and oxytocin. RESULTS: An interim analysis after recruitment of 321 subjects, 67% of the planned sample, found similar cesarean rates for the three groups (laminaria 36%; PGE(2) gel 33%; saline infusion 29%; P =.59); however, the mean randomization-to-delivery interval was significantly longer in the PGE(2) group. Stochastic curtailment, as part of the interim analysis, indicated a low likelihood of achieving a statistically significant difference in cesarean rates between PGE(2) gel and the other two groups. Therefore, we completed the study with saline infusion and laminaria. The saline infusion and laminaria groups had similar preinduction characteristics. The cesarean rates were similar (saline infusion 25.4% versus laminaria 30.3%; P =.32), but the mean interval from randomization to delivery was shorter in the saline infusion group (18.0 versus 21.5 hours, P =.002). There were no significant differences in selected maternal and neonatal morbidities. CONCLUSION: Cervical ripening with extra-amniotic saline infusion, PGE(2), or laminaria resulted in comparable cesarean rates in women with an unfavorable cervix and indications for labor induction. Extra-amniotic saline infusion had the shortest randomization-to-delivery interval without increasing maternal or neonatal morbidity.     

A prospective randomized controlled trial that compared misoprostol, Foley catheter, and combination misoprostol-Foley catheter for labor induction

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of combination intravaginal misoprostol and intracervical Foley catheter for prelabor cervical ripening. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective, randomized controlled trial was conducted. Women who were undergoing labor induction, with a singleton gestation >or=28 weeks and an unfavorable cervix (Bishop score 相似文献   

Unsucessful labour induction in women with unfavourable cervical scores: predictors and management

BACKGROUND: Misoprostol fails to induce labour in 5-20% of women at term. AIM: To analyse possible predictors of unsuccessful induction with 50 microg vaginal misoprostol and effectiveness and the safety of intracervical Foley catheter application in induction failures. METHODS: An observational study was conducted on 1030 women with singleton, live fetuses, vertex presentation, > 34 weeks of gestation and Bishop score < 5. Induction of labour with 50 microg vaginal misoprostol repeated every 6 h was attempted. Women without regular uterine contractions and cervical changes at the end of 24 h were considered to be unsuccessful, and a transcervical Foley balloon catheter was placed and inflated with 50 mL saline. Possible predictors of induction failures were analysed via logistic regression analysis. Neonatal outcomes and vaginal delivery achieved after Foley catheter were also determined. RESULTS: Induction was successful in 918 cases (89.1%) and Foley catheter was placed in 112 (10.8%) women. Increasing gestational age in weeks (odds ratio [OR] 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.68-0.88) and increasing Bishop score (OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.60-0.90) decreased the risk of failed induction. Failure rates were 16% (27/169) in post-term nulliparous women with Bishop score 相似文献   

Extra-amniotic Foley catheter and prostaglandin E(2) gel for cervical ripening at term gestation.

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the efficacy of intravaginal prostaglandin E(2) gel in comparison with that of a Foley catheter for cervical ripening and induction of labor. STUDY DESIGN: Consecutive patients with unfavorable cervix requiring preinduction cervical ripening and induction of labor at term gestation were asked to participate in the study. One hundred and two patients were assigned to treatment with intravaginal prostaglandin E(2) gel (group 1) and 122 patients underwent the placement of an intracervical Foley catheter (group 2). After a maximum of three applications of intravaginal prostaglandin E(2) gel (18h) or after 18h from Foley catheter insertion oxytocin was administered to patients not in active labor. Labor profiles and pregnancy and neonatal outcome were compared between groups. RESULTS: The groups were comparable in term of demographic characteristics, indications for induction of labor, Bishop score at admission. The induction to labor time and the induction to delivery time were similar between groups. The cesarean sections rate was higher in group 1 than in group 2 (26.5 versus 14.7%, P<0.05). This remained significant when the analysis was restricted to nulliparous patients (32.3 versus 14.2%). The incidence of urinary tract infections, chorioamnionitis, and febrile morbidity was similar between groups. CONCLUSION: For preinduction cervical ripening, the Foley catheter is a valid alternative to the application of intravaginal prostaglandin E(2) gel and it is associated with a lower cesarean rate in nulliparous women.     

Preinduction cervical ripening. A randomized trial of intravaginal misoprostol alone vs. a combination of transcervical Foley balloon and intravaginal misoprostol.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if the addition of a mechanical ripening agent (transcervical Foley balloon) to a pharmacologic agent (intravaginal misoprostol) improves the efficiency of preinduction cervical ripening. STUDY DESIGN: Singleton patients with an indication for delivery, unfavorable cervix (Bishop score < or = 5) and no contraindication to labor were randomly assigned to two groups: misoprostol alone (25 micrograms intravaginally every 3 hours for no more than 12 hr) or combination therapy (25-French transcervical Foley balloon inflated to 50 mL of sterile water with identical intravaginal misoprostol dosing). All patients received a history and physical examination (including Bishop score), preripening ultrasound, electronic fetal heart rate and contraction monitoring (to rule out spontaneous labor and document fetal well-being). Multiple variables of perinatal outcome were analyzed, including the main outcome variables of ripening-to-delivery time and cesarean section rate. RESULTS: During August 1998 to August 1999, 81 patients were randomized, 40 to misoprostol alone and 41 to combination therapy. There were no differences between the groups with respect to maternal demographics, preripening Bishop score, maternal complications, intrapartum intervention or neonatal outcome. The misoprostol group spent longer periods of time in active labor, and there was a trend for the combination group to require oxytocin for longer intervals. These findings did not significantly affect the total ripening-to-delivery time or cesarean section rate which were similar for both groups. CONCLUSION: The addition of mechanical ripening with a transcervical Foley balloon to intravaginal misoprostol did not improve the efficiency of preinduction cervical ripening. Mechanical and pharmacologic cervical ripening agents appear to act independently rather than synergistically.     

Foley尿管水囊促宫颈成熟用于足月妊娠引产的前瞻性随机对照研究

目的 比较Foley尿管水囊与普贝生栓促宫颈成熟用于足月妊娠引产的安全性和有效性. 方法 采用前瞻性随机对照研究方法,选择2009年6月至12月在本院待产的孕足月、单胎头位、有引产指征、阴道清洁度≤Ⅱ度、胎膜完整、官颈Bishop评分＜6分的初产妇,签署随机对照研究知情同意书后,随机分为2组,最终纳入分析的共126例,分别予Foley尿管水囊(64例)和普贝生栓(62例)促官颈成熟,Foley尿管水囊组与普贝生栓组孕妇的孕周、引产前宫颈评分、引产指征差异无统计学意义.采用t、x2检验或Fisher精确概率法比较2组孕妇的引产成功率、分娩方式、产程时间及母儿结局. 结果 Foley尿管水囊组与普贝生栓组宫颈评分改善、引产成功率、阴道分娩率、总产程、产后出血量差异均无统计学意义(P＞0.05).Foley尿管水囊组较普贝生栓组引产24 h内阴道分娩率低[28.1％(18/64)与56.5％(35/62),t=10.37,P＜0.05],宫缩过频过强发生率也较低[0.0％(0/64)与17.7％(11/62),P＜0.05],但缩宫素使用率高[87.5％(56/64)与21.0％(13/62),x2 =56.27,P＜0.05].2组新生儿Apgar评分、羊水胎粪污染发生率、新生儿体重差异均无统计学意义(P＞0.05).2组孕妇无一例发生产褥感染. 结论 严格掌握Foley尿管水囊促宫颈成熟的指征及执行无菌操作规程,可以取得与普贝生栓相似的促官颈成熟效果及引产母婴结局,未发生过频过强官缩,具有安全性高及成本低廉等优点.     

A comparison of vaginally administered misoprostol with extra-amniotic saline solution infusion for cervical ripening and labor induction

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare intravaginal misoprostol with extra-amniotic saline solution infusion with concomitant oxytocin for cervical ripening and labor induction in viable pregnancies. STUDY DESIGN: Two hundred women with indications for labor induction and unfavorable cervices were assigned randomly to vaginal misoprostol or extra-amniotic saline solution infusion. Twenty-five micrograms of misoprostol was administered every 4 hours up to six doses, followed by intravenous oxytocin administration. Patients who had received extra-amniotic saline solution infusion also received intravenous oxytocin along with a maximum 12-hour saline solution infusion through Foley catheters that were placed above the internal cervical os. RESULTS: One hundred women were randomly assigned to misoprostol, and 100 women were assigned randomly to extra-amniotic saline solution infusion. The average interval from start of induction to vaginal delivery was longer in the misoprostol group (1323.3 +/- 700.3 minutes) than in the extra-amniotic saline solution infusion group (970.4 +/- 502.7 minutes; P =.006, log transformed data). Abnormal fetal heart rate tracings were found in 30% of the patients who received misoprostol and in 19% of the patients who received extra-amniotic saline solution infusion (relative risk, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.0-2.4; P =.05). There was more tachysystole in the misoprostol group (8%) than in the extra-amniotic saline solution infusion group (1%; P =.02). There were no differences in the routes of deliveries or neonatal outcomes between groups. CONCLUSION: Extra-amniotic saline solution infusion with oxytocin administration appears more effective and is associated with fewer maternal complications than misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction.     

Efficacy and Patient Satisfaction with Outpatient Prostaglandin E2 versus Foley Catheter for Cervical Ripening—A Randomized Trial

Introduction: an important factor in the success of labour induction is the presence of a ripe cervix. The safety and efficacy of outpatient prostaglandin E₂ (PGE₂) administered intracervically compared to extra-amniotic cervical Foley catheter placement to ripen the cervix were studied. Patient satisfaction and overall cost with both methods were reported for the first time.Methods: pregnant women with uncomplicated term pregnancies having an indication for induction of labour were enrolled. Singleton pregnancies with intact membranes and cervical Bishop scores < 5 were randomized blindly to receive .5 mg intracervical PGE2 (n=67) every six to eight hours or intracervical Foley catheter (extra-amniotic) (n=62) insertion overnight. Cervical assessments were carried out prior to treatment and again before induction of labour. Patients filled out a post-treatment Likert questionnaire.Results: overall change in Bishop score did not differ between the two groups. The Foley treatment group were more likely to have Mated to three to four cm (χ²=5.48 DF=1 p=.02). Intrapartum variables, mode of delivery and post-partum complications were similar. For patients completing the questionnaire, pain experienced during insertion was similar, however, fewer patients would recommend the Foley catheter treatment to a pregnant friend (F[1,64]=5.53 p=.02). The price of the Foley catheter is much less than the PGE₂.Conclusion: both methods lead to similar changes in overall Bishop score although the intracervical Foley catheter was more likely to lead to cervical dilatation of three centimetres or more—a dilatation which facilitates amniotomy. There were no differences in the mode of delivery, maternal or neonatal outcomes. Patients reported the same amount of pain with both treatments but patients seem to prefer the more expensive PGE₂.     

Intracervical Foley catheter balloon vs. prostaglandin in preinduction cervical ripening.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of the intracervical Foley balloon catheter and 3 mg prostaglandin E(2) tablet(s) in preinduction cervical ripening. METHODS: Ninety women referred to the maternity clinic for induction of labor with a Bishop score of less than or equal to 5 were randomized to receive an intracervical Foley catheter or prostaglandin E(2) tablets. The primary measured outcome was ripening of the cervix as measured with the Bishop score. RESULTS: There were no differences in mean Bishop scores between the prostaglandin and the Foley catheter groups. Bishop scores (mean+/-S.D.) after ripening were 6.6+/-0.80 and 6.7+/-0.86 for the Foley catheter and prostaglandin groups, respectively (P=0.54). The Foley catheter group showed a statistically shorter time to ripening compared with the prostaglandin group (3.4+/-2.1 and 6.5+/-3.2 h, respectively (P=0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in induction time (4.8+/-1.8 h and 5.3+/-2.4 h, respectively (P=0.36). CONCLUSIONS: There are no differences in preinduction cervical ripening efficacy between prostaglandin E(2) and the Foley catheter, but the Foley catheter has the advantage of ripening an unfavorable cervix in a shorter time.     

Labor progression and risk of cesarean delivery in electively induced nulliparas

OBJECTIVE: To describe the pattern of labor progression and risk of cesarean delivery in women whose labor was electively induced. METHODS: We analyzed data on all low-risk, nulliparous women with an elective induction or spontaneous onset of labor between 37 + 0 and 40 + 6 weeks from January 2002 to March 2004 at a single institution. The median duration of labor by each centimeter of cervical dilation and the risk of cesarean delivery were computed for 143 women with preinduction cervical ripening and oxytocin induction, 286 women with oxytocin induction, and 1,771 women with a spontaneous onset of labor. An intracervical Foley catheter was used to ripen the cervix. RESULTS: Electively induced labor with cervical ripening had substantially slower latent and early active phases. After controlling for potential confounders, women who had an elective induction with cervical ripening had 3.5 times the risk of cesarean delivery during the first stage of labor (95% confidence interval 2.7-4.5), compared with those admitted in spontaneous labor. Elective induction without cervical ripening, on the other hand, was associated with a faster labor progression from 4 to 10 cm (266 compared with 358 minutes, P < .01) and did not increase the risk of cesarean delivery, compared with those in spontaneous labor. CONCLUSION: The pattern of labor progression differs substantially for women with an electively induced labor compared with those with spontaneous onset of labor. Furthermore, elective induction in nulliparous women with an unfavorable cervix has a high rate of labor arrest and a substantially increased risk of cesarean delivery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-2.     

Risk of cesarean delivery after induction at term in nulliparous women with an unfavorable cervix

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of induction on the route of delivery in nulliparous women laboring at term in a community hospital system. STUDY DESIGN: From April 1997 to October 1999, there were 7282 deliveries in nulliparous patients who met inclusion criteria. Cesarean delivery rates were calculated for patients in spontaneous labor and for patients who underwent induction. RESULTS: Among 4635 women (63.7%) in spontaneous labor, the cesarean delivery rate was 11.5% versus 23.7% among the 2647 (36.3%) patients who underwent induction. An important variable that affected the delivery route was the Bishop score at the initiation of the induction. The cesarean delivery rate was 31.5% among patients whose Bishop score was <5 at induction versus 18.1% for patients with a score > or =5(P <.001). CONCLUSION: The induction of labor in nulliparous patients, especially those women with an unfavorable cervix as measured by Bishop score, is associated with a significantly increased risk of cesarean delivery.     

Comparison of induction of labor methods for unfavorable cervices in trial of labor after cesarean delivery

Objective: To compare induction of labor methods in patients attempting a trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) with an unfavorable cervix.

Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study from patients attempting TOLAC from 2009 to 2013. Patients with a simplified Bishop score of three or less where labor was initiated with either a Cook balloon or oxytocin were included. Our primary outcome was mode of delivery. Our secondary outcomes included duration of labor and multiple maternal and neonatal morbidities.

Results: Two-hundred and fourteen women met inclusion criteria: 150 received oxytocin and 64 had the Cook balloon placed. The vaginal birth after cesarean delivery rate was significantly higher in the oxytocin group at 70.7% versus 50.0% in the Cook balloon group (p?=?0.004). In the multivariable analysis, odds for cesarean delivery were two times higher with the Cook balloon than with oxytocin (Adjusted OR?=?2.09, 95% CI?=?1.05-4.18, p?=?0.036). The duration of labor was longer with the Cook balloon versus oxytocin (21.9 versus 16.3?hours, p?=?0.0002). There were no significant differences in maternal and neonatal health outcomes.

Conclusion: Oxytocin induction of labor was associated with a higher rate of vaginal delivery and a shorter duration of labor compared to the Cook balloon in women undergoing TOLAC with an unfavorable cervix.     

Laminaria versus extra-amniotic saline solution infusion for cervical ripening in second-trimester labor inductions

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine which cervical ripening method, laminaria placement or extra-amniotic saline solution infusion, was associated with the shorter interval from induction to delivery in the second trimester. STUDY DESIGN: Women admitted for indicated second-trimester labor induction with an unfavorable cervix were randomly assigned to receive either intracervical placement of laminaria (n = 25) or extra-amniotic saline solution infusion (n = 25) with concurrent concentrated oxytocin and vaginally administered prostaglandin E2 (10 mg every 6 hours). Treatment success was defined as an interval from induction to delivery of < or =24 hours. RESULTS: Maternal age, race, parity, gestational age, and initial cervical dilatation were similar between the groups. Indications for uterine evacuation were also similar and included fetal death (n = 7), aneuploidy (n = 20), fetal structural anomaly (n = 18), and maternal indications (n = 4). There was no difference in the mean intervals from induction to delivery (laminaria, 16 +/- 8 hours, vs extra-amniotic saline solution infusion, 17 +/- 10 hours) or the number of treatment successes (laminaria, n = 23, vs extra-amniotic saline solution infusion, n = 21). Retained placenta, live birth, and hemorrhage occurred with similar frequencies in the two groups. CONCLUSION: Relative to laminaria, extra-amniotic saline solution infusion did not shorten the induction-to-delivery interval in women undergoing indicated second-trimester labor induction with concentrated oxytocin and low-dose vaginally administered prostaglandin E2.     

Balloon cervical ripening with extra-amniotic infusion of saline or prostaglandin E2: a double-blind, randomized controlled study

OBJECTIVE: To compare extra-amniotic infusion of diluted prostaglandin (PG) E2 solution with saline infusion in balloon cervical ripening and labor induction. METHODS: Women with pregnancy complications and Bishop scores of 3 or lower (n = 116) were assigned randomly to receive extra-amniotic infusion (1 mL/minute) of normal saline or PGE2 in saline (0.5 microg/mL) through a Foley catheter with a 30-mL inflated balloon. We induced labor using intravenous oxytocin only when labor had not developed by 6 hours after balloon expulsion. Analysis was by intent-to-treat. We assessed ripening efficiency and course of labor in women who had spontaneous balloon expulsion (n = 110) and trial of labor (n = 107), respectively. RESULTS: Ripening with PGE2 was associated with significantly shorter mean (+/- standard error of the mean [SEM]) time for balloon expulsion (4.7 +/- 0.4 versus 6.5 +/- 0.6 hours) and with significantly higher Bishop scores (P <.002), compared with ripening with saline. In the PGE2 group, rates of labor induction (15%) and oxytocin use (37%) were significantly lower than in the saline group (51% and 72%, respectively). The groups did not differ significantly in other labor abnormalities, labor duration, mode of delivery, birth weight, Apgar scores, and puerperal morbidity. CONCLUSION: Cervical ripening by extra-amniotic balloon and PGE2 infusion is faster and more effective than by balloon and saline infusion, resulting in a higher rate of spontaneous labor and a lower rate of oxytocin use.