The role of surveillance duplex scanning in preventing venous thromboembolism in trauma patients

BACKGROUND: This study was performed to determine the role of duplex scanning in preventing pulmonary embolism (PE), the correlation of venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk score with the incidence of deep venous thrombosis (DVT), and patients who may benefit from surveillance duplex scanning. METHODS: Age, sex, Injury Severity Score (ISS), VTE score, length of stay, diagnoses, and bleeding risk were recorded from the trauma registry in patients who had a duplex scan from 1995 to 2000. RESULTS: There were 1,513 duplex scans obtained (10,141 trauma admissions), 253 (2.5%) cases of DVT (52% above-knee, 8% upper extremity), and 30 cases of PE (0.3%). Only 5 of 21 duplex scans were positive in PE patients. DVT patients were older (52.9 vs. 46.7 years), with higher ISS (24.0 vs. 20.8) than patients without DVT. Regression analysis showed poor correlation between VTE score and DVT incidence (r2 = 0.27). Univariate analysis identified age, ISS, and VTE score as risk predictors for DVT. CONCLUSION: Adherence to an evidence-based VTE prophylaxis protocol is more important than surveillance duplex scanning in preventing VTE in trauma patients.     

Inappropriate use of venous duplex scans: An analysis of indications and results

Purpose: The increasing demand for venous duplex scans despite the relative rarity of detecting acute deep venous thrombosis (DVT) prompted us to review our experience with this diagnostic method.Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the results and indications of 2993 lower extremity venous duplex scans performed between July 1, 1992, and June 30, 1994, at our institution. The indication for the study and the results were prospectively recorded in a computerized data bank. The indications for these studies were leg pain (34%), leg swelling (24%), surveillance for DVT in a patient at high risk (23%), searching for a source of pulmonary embolism (14%), follow-up of previously diagnosed DVT (3%), and other indications (i.e., varicose veins, venous ulcer, 2%).Results: Overall, 74.1% of all scans were completely normal, and only 13.1% detected acute proximal (popliteal vein or higher) DVT. Scans performed for surveillance (87.3% normal) or source of pulmonary embolism (79.6% normal) were significantly more likely to be normal than when performed for any other indication (p < 0.01). When leg edema or calf tenderness was present, the incidence of acute DVT was significantly greater for all indications (p < 0.0001).Conclusions : The high percentage of normal venous scans implies that this diagnostic method is being inappropriately used. In the current climate of cost containment our data suggest that indications for venous duplex scans must be better defined and that improved education for referring physicians is needed. (J Vasc Surg 1996;23:881-6.)     

Duplex ultrasound surveillance for deep vein thrombosis after acute traumatic spinal cord injury at rehabilitation admission

Context/objective: To determine the prevalence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) detected through routine duplex screening and factors associated with DVT in spinal cord injury (SCI) patients on admission to rehabilitation.

Design: Retrospective chart review of medical records.

Setting: Acute inpatient rehabilitation.

Participants: One hundred and eighty-nine individuals admitted to rehabilitation within 2 weeks of initial traumatic SCI who underwent routine surveillance with duplex scan for DVT.

Interventions: Duplex scan of lower extremities.

Outcome measures: The dependent variable was positive duplex screening for either any DVT (distal and/or proximal) or proximal DVT.

Results: Of the 189 patients, 31 patients (16.4%) had a positive scan for any (proximal and/or distal) DVT, with 9 (4.8%) positive for a proximal DVT and 22 (11.6%) positive for isolated distal DVT. Of those with isolated distal DVT, 31.8% later developed propagation with either proximal DVTs or pulmonary embolism (mean?=?22 days). Factors significantly associated with positive duplex scans for any (proximal and/or distal) DVT include more severe neurological injury (AIS A, B or C versus AIS D: χ²?=?7.1791, df?=?1, P?=?0.007) and older age (age ≥50 years old: χ²?=?14.9410, df?=?1, P?=?0.000).

Conclusion: In acute traumatic SCI, older age and more severe neurological impairment (AIS A, B, and C) are independent risk factors for positive duplex screening for any (proximal and/or distal) DVT detected on rehabilitation admission. Individuals with an acute distal DVT have a high likelihood for future thrombus progression. Routine surveillance for these patients may be warranted.     

The incidence of thromboembolism in the surgical intensive care unit

The clinical diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) is unreliable. Studies have been performed examining the utility of frequent duplex scans. However, these studies included patients outside of the intensive care unit. The incidence of venous thromboembolism and the effect of a less intense surveillance protocol was prospectively examined at a level-1 urban trauma center for a 6 month period. During the study period there were 726 admission to the surgical intensive care unit. Sequential compression devices (SCDs) were used for DVT prophylaxis in 93 per cent of the admissions. A total of 114 duplex scans were ordered: 42 per cent for surveillance and the rest for evaluation of a clinical indication. Twelve DVTs were discovered (11% overall DVT rate). No patient on subcutaneous heparin or low-molecular-weight heparin developed a DVT or pulmonary embolism (PE). Four patients suffered a PE; however, none were found to have a lower extremity DVT on duplex ultrasound and all received SCD prophylaxis. Overall, proper use of DVT prophylaxis for intensive care unit days 1-14 was 77 per cent. The incidence of venous thromboembolism in a group of patients at overall high risk was low. A program of DVT surveillance with duplex ultrasound was not cost-effective.     

全髋关节置换术后深静脉血栓形成

目的：探讨全髋关节置换术后下肢深静脉血栓形成（DVT）的发生情况及预防治疗措施。方法：对220例（244髋）全髋关节置换患者围手术期皮下注射低分子肝素来预防治疗下肢深静脉血栓形成。术后第7天行彩色多普勒超声检查。结果：58例发生下肢深静脉血栓，其中远端血栓33例，近端血栓14例，全静脉血栓11例，DVT发生率26．4％，未发生1例肺栓塞。结论：围手术期低分子肝素应用可降低全髋关节置换术后DVT发生率，且安全可靠。     

Laterality of deep venous thrombosis among trauma patients: are we screening our patients adequately?

OBJECTIVES: Major trauma represents a significant risk for development of deep venous thrombosis (DVT). Duplex ultrasonography is a noninvasive test to identify DVT and has been suggested for screening asymptomatic high-risk trauma patients. While some risk factors for DVT are well described, it remains unclear whether site of DVT development is associated with anatomical location of injury. An association between anatomical locations of injury would serve to highlight the importance of directed screening of those extremities at highest risk. Therefore, we hypothesize that location of DVT correlates with side of lower extremity injury. METHODS: We performed an 11-year (1995-2005) retrospective review from the prospectively collected trauma registry at an urban, university-based, level I trauma center. All trauma patients with lower extremity DVT were included. Lateralizing lower extremity injuries were defined as penetrating or blunt injuries affecting only one lower extremity. Fisher's exact test compared concordance between side of injury and side of DVT. RESULTS: A total of 6674 trauma patients were admitted, of whom 40 (0.6%) were diagnosed with lower extremity or pelvic DVT. Mean age of patients with DVT was 39 y, with 80% male, 80% African American, and 55% penetrating trauma. Fourteen patients (35%) with DVT sustained lateralizing lower extremity injuries (6 gunshot wounds, 5 tibia/fibula fractures, 2 femur fractures, and 1 calcaneus fracture). Twelve of these 14 patients (86%) developed DVT on the same side as their injury; (7/7 on right side and 5/7 on left side, P = 0.02). The 26 patients without lateralizing injuries had equal distribution of DVT (39% right, 42% left, and 19% bilateral). CONCLUSION: Patients who sustained lateralizing lower extremity injury and developed lower extremity DVT had a high likelihood of developing their DVT on the same side as their injury. A larger multi-institutional analysis is needed to assess the correlation between injury site and anatomical location of DVT before suggesting any changes in recommendations for duplex screening.     

Pediatric orthopaedic lower extremity trauma and venous thromboembolism

Purpose

Research on venous thromboembolism events (VTE), such as deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), in pediatric orthopaedic trauma patients is sparse. We describe the incidence in the USA of VTE associated with pediatric lower extremity orthopaedic trauma, and characterize injury patterns and VTE treatment methods.

Methods

The Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) was queried from 2004 to 2013 using ICD-9 codes for lower extremity fractures (pelvis, femur, tibia, ankle, foot) and dislocations (hip, knee, ankle, subtalar) and VTE. Records were queried for age, diagnoses, and VTE treatment.

Results

During the study period 285,611 clinical encounters reported lower extremity trauma. Of those, 167 patients were simultaneously coded with VTE (99 DVT, 50 PE, 18 combined DVT/PE), to give an incidence of VTE associated with pediatric lower extremity trauma of 0.058 %. Patients were from 39 centers, with an average age of 12.9 years (range 0–19). There were 249 fractures and 21 dislocations, with 25 (15 %) patients sustaining more than one lower extremity injury. The most common fracture locations were the femur/femoral neck (95), tibia/ankle (92), and pelvis (44). 72 % (121/167) of patients were treated with anticoagulation medication, of which the most common was low-molecular-weight heparin (111/167, 66 %).

Conclusions

The incidence of VTE events associated with lower extremity orthopaedic trauma is 0.058 %. Adolescents and polytrauma patients with injuries of the femur/femoral neck, tibia/ankle, and pelvis are more commonly affected. Low-molecular-weight heparin is commonly used to treat VTE in pediatric and adolescent patients.     

Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis after Head and Spinal Trauma: Intermittent Pneumatic Compression Devices Versus Low Molecular Weight Heparin

Although there are alternative methods and drugs for preventing venous thromboembolism (VTE), it is not clear which modality is most suitable and efficacious for patients with severe (stable or unstable) head/spinal injures. The aim of this study was to compare intermittent pneumatic compression devices (IPC) with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for preventing VTE. We prospectively randomized 120 head/spinal traumatized patients for comparison of IPC with LMWH as a prophylaxis modality against VTE. Venous duplex color-flow Doppler sonography of the lower extremities was performed each week of hospitalization and 1 week after discharge. When there was a suspicion of pulmonary embolism (PE), patients were evaluated with spiral computed tomography. Patients were analyzed for demographic features, injury severity scores, associated injuries, type of head/spinal trauma, complications, transfusion, and incidence of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and PE. Two patients (3.33%) from the IPC group and 4 patients (6.66%) from the LMWH group died, with their deaths due to PE. Nine other patients also succumbed, unrelated to PE. DVT developed in 4 patients (6.66%) in the IPC group and in 3 patients (5%) in the LMWH group. There was no statistically significant difference regarding a reduction in DVT, PE, or mortality between groups (p = 0.04, p > 0.05, p > 0.05, respectively). IPC can be used safely for prophylaxis of VTE in head/spinal trauma patients.     

A potentially expanded role for enoxaparin in preventing venous thromboembolism in high risk blunt trauma patients

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a frequent and potentially life-threatening complication after trauma. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of enoxaparin in preventing deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) after injury in patients who are at high risk for developing VTE. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective single-cohort observational study was initiated for seriously injured blunt trauma patients admitted to a Level I trauma center during a 7-month period. Patients were eligible for the study if time hospitalized was > or = 72 hours, Injury Severity Score (ISS) was > or = 9, enoxaparin was started within 24 hours after admission, and one or more of the following high risk criteria were met: age > 50 years, ISS > or = 16, presence of a femoral vein catheter, Abbreviated Injury Score (AIS) > or = 3 for any body region, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) Score < or = 8, presence of major pelvic, femur, or tibia fracture, and presence of direct blunt mechanism venous injury. Patients with closed head injuries and nonoperatively treated solid abdominal organ injuries were also potential participants. The primary outcomes measured were thromboembolic events--either a documented lower extremity DVT by duplex color-flow doppler ultrasonography or a PE documented by rapid infusion CT pulmonary angiography or conventional pulmonary angiography. RESULTS: There were 118 patients enrolled in the study. Two patients (2%) developed DVT, one of which was proximal to the calf (95% confidence interval, 0% to 6%). Two of 12 patients (17%) with splenic injuries who received enoxaparin failed initial nonoperative management. There were no other bleeding complications, and no clinical evidence or documented episodes of PE. One patient died from multiple system organ failure. CONCLUSIONS: Enoxaparin is a practical and effective method for reducing the incidence of VTE in high risk, seriously injured patients. This study supports further investigation into the safety of enoxaparin prophylaxis in patients with closed head injuries and nonoperatively treated solid abdominal organ injuries.     

Surveillance Venous Duplex Is Not Clinically Useful after Total Joint Arthroplasty When Effective Deep Venous Thrombosis Prophylaxis Is Used

The early detection of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and treatment with systemic anticoagulation to prevent pulmonary embolism (PE) are essential in the management of patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty (TJA). However, improvements in prophylactic measures have significantly decreased the occurrence of DVT in these patients. The purpose of this study was to determine whether routine postoperative duplex surveillance for DVT remains clinically useful. The medical records of all patients undergoing total knee or total hip arthroplasty between October 1997 and January 2002 at a University Hospital and its Veterans Affairs (VA) affiliate were reviewed. The type of operation and occurrence of complications (e.g., DVT, PE, and hemorrhage) were noted. All patients were treated postoperatively with both enoxaparin 30 mg b.i.d. and bilateral lower extremity sequential compression devices (SCDs). A venous duplex scan was performed prior to discharge. Three hundred ninety-eight patients underwent 441 TJAs for 149 hips and 292 knees. The average age was 65 years (range, 23-95). Venous duplex scans were performed within 1 week (median, 4 days) of operation. Initial inpatient scans revealed acute, ipsilateral DVT in five patients (1.3%). Three patients experienced documented PE—one as an inpatient and two after hospital discharge; both outpatients had negative in-hospital duplex scans. One of the 398 patients did not have a duplex scan as an inpatient and returned 6 weeks later with a popliteal DVT. Complications included one upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage, and one patient died postoperatively of unknown causes. These data demonstrate that routine postoperative venous duplex scans rarely found DVT (5 of 398 patients) after TJA when effective prophylaxis was used. Furthermore, surveillance scanning did not enable reliable prediction of PE. Therefore, we conclude that postoperative inpatient surveillance duplex scans for DVT provide very minimal benefit and that a routine screening program is not clinically useful for patients managed with effective DVT prophylaxis.Presented at the Twenty-eighth Annual Meeting of the Peripheral Vascular Surgery Society, Chicago, IL, June 7, 2003.     

Efficacy of color flow duplex imaging for proximal upper extremity venous outflow obstruction in hemodialysis patients

Purpose: The efficacy of color flow duplex imaging (CFDI) in detecting proximal upper extremity venous outflow obstruction in hemodialysis patients was compared with that of traditional contrast venography. Methods: From 1993 through 1997, all hemodialysis patients who were evaluated for upper extremity venous outflow obstruction of the axillary, subclavian, or brachiocephalic veins with both CFDI and venography were identified. Medical history, hemodialysis access procedures, and indications for imaging were reviewed. The diagnostic accuracy of CFDI was compared with that of venography for proximal venous outflow obstruction, including focal stricture, partial obstruction, or complete occlusion. Results: Sixty upper extremities in 42 hemodialysis patients were imaged with both CFDI and venography. Previous ipsilateral intravenous dialysis catheters had been present in 33 (55%) of the extremities imaged; current catheters were present in 16 (27%) of the extremities imaged; and 28 (67%) of the extremities imaged had a current ipsilateral arteriovenous (AV) shunt. Five (8%) of the 60 duplex scans were nondiagnostic because of artifact from intravenous dialysis catheters (3) or incomplete visualization of the subclavian or brachiocephalic veins (2) and were excluded from further analysis. In the remaining 55 duplex scans, proximal venous outflow obstruction was found in 18 (33%), compared with 21 (38%) identified by means of venography (P = not significant [NS]). Overall sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for CFDI were 81%, 97%, 94%, and 89%, respectively. Conclusion: CFDI is a reliable means of detecting proximal upper extremity venous outflow obstruction and should replace contrast venography as the initial imaging study in hemodialysis patients. (J Vasc Surg 1998;28:869-75.)     

Heparin, deep venous thrombosis, and trauma patients

One hundred consecutive patients with multiple trauma, who were admitted to a level I trauma center with an injury severity score of 10 or greater, were studied prospectively. A duplex scan was used to evaluate each patient initially and at set intervals during the hospitalization for the presence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT). The prophylactic regimen for DVT in this study was 5,000 U of subcutaneous heparin every 12 hours. This was used in 50 patients at the discretion of the attending physician, while the remaining 50 patients received no DVT prophylaxis. Fourteen of 50 patients (28%) who were receiving heparin developed DVT, while only 1 patient (2%) of the 50 who did not receive heparin developed DVT. The use of heparin did not provide any significant protection in the susceptible trauma patient. It is believed that those patients with minimal lower extremity injuries, lower injury severity scores, and a shorter period of immobilization do not require any form of DVT prophylaxis. However, those patients at increased risk for DVT are better served with either increased doses of heparin or alternative forms of DVT prophylaxis.     

Deep venous thrombosis in patients with chronic spinal cord injury

Context/Objective: Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) is a well-known complication of an acute spinal cord injury (SCI). However, the prevalence of DVT in patients with chronic SCI has only been reported in a limited number of studies. The aim of our study was to examine the prevalence of DVT in patients with SCI beyond three months after injury.

Design: Cross-sectional study.

Setting: Rehabilitation Department at the Bydgoszcz University Hospital in Poland.

Participants: Sixty-three patients with SCI that were more than 3 months post injury. The patients, ranging in age from 13 to 65 years, consisted of 15 women and 48 men; the mean age of the patients was 32.1 years. The time from injury varied from 4 to 124 months.

Outcome measures: Clinical assessment, D-dimer and venous duplex scan.

Results: The venous duplex scan revealed DVT in 5 of the 63 patients. The post-injury time in four of the patients varied between 4 and 5 months; one patient was 42 months post-injury.

Conclusion: DVT occurred in patients with chronic SCI, mainly by the 6th post injury month.     

Deep venous thrombosis in the pediatric trauma population: an unusual event: report of three cases

The incidence of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in the pediatric population has been reported to be lower than in adults. Pediatric trauma patients have predisposing risk factors for DVT similar to those in the general trauma population. We reviewed the records of 2746 children under 16 years of age admitted to our Level I pediatric trauma service from 1989 to 1997. Only three cases of DVT were documented, all adolescents. DVT was located in the upper (n = 1) and lower (n = 1) extremity venous system. One patient presented with pulmonary embolism alone without identifiable DVT. Risk factors found were venous system manipulations, including atriocaval shunt, subclavian central line, and hyperinflated medical antishock trousers garment. Therapy consisted of heparin followed by warfarin anticoagulation. A vena cava filter was inserted in one patient for whom systemic anticoagulation was contraindicated. No DVT was seen in 1123 closed head injury patients or 29 spinal cord injury patients without associated risk factors. The thrombotic risk in pediatric trauma patients is low. Routine screening or prophylaxis is not indicated except for patients who are likely to remain immobile for an extended period of time and require prolonged rehabilitation, have venous manipulations, or present with clinical symptoms. Hematologic evaluation in patients with diagnosed DVT is necessary to identify individual risk factors.     

Is venous duplex imaging an appropriate initial screening test for patients with suspected pulmonary embolism?

Noninvasive tests for deep venous thrombosis (DVT) are helpful in evaluating patients with suspected pulmonary embolism (PE) who have non-high-probability ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) lung scans. Based on the enthusiasm for these noninvasive tests, venous duplex imaging (VDI) has evolved as the initial screening test for patients with clinically suspected PE in some centers. This study evaluates the utility of VDI as the initial test in a diagnostic algorithm for patients with suspected PE. A total of 306 consecutive patients who underwent VDI as the initial screening test for clinically suspected PE during the past 24 months were reviewed; 121 patients were subsequently evaluated with V/Q scans and 20 underwent pulmonary arteriography. VDI demonstrated DVT in 10% (23/216), with 7% (22/306) having proximal DVT and 3% (9/306) having isolated calf DVT. In 25 patients with unilateral leg symptoms, DVT was found in 40% (10/25); however, among the 281 without unilateral leg symptoms, results of VDI were abnormal in only 5% (15/281). V/Q scans were obtained in 40% (121/306), with only 16% (19/121) of scans showing a high probability of PE. DVT was found in 25% (5/19) of patients with high-probability V/Q scans and in 25% (26/102) with non-high-probability scans. In patients with clinically suspected PE the incidence of detectable infrainguinal DVT is low. VDI appears to be a reasonable initial screening test in patients with clinically suspected PE and unilateral leg symptoms. However, in patients without unilateral leg symptoms, the diagnostic yield is low and an alternative diagnostic approach appears justified.Supported in part by NIH grant 1 K07HL02658-01.Presented at the Twentieth Annual Meeting of the Peripheral Vascular Surgery Society, New Orleans, La., June 10, 1995.     

Perioperative incidence and locations of deep vein thrombosis following specific isolated lower extremity fractures

PurposeTo determine perioperative incidence and locations of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in injured and uninjured lower extremities following isolated lower extremity fractures (ILEFs).MethodsRetrospective analysis of a prospectively collected data of a consecutive patient series with ILEFs who underwent surgical treatment between September 2014 and September 2017 was performed. Patients’ bilateral lower extremities were screened for DVT with duplex ultrasonography (DUS) before and after surgery. DVT occurrence was analyzed by location of DVT and fracture site. All patients received pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis while hospitalized. Data on demographics, time to surgery, time of DUS examinations, length of hospital stay and symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE) was collected.Results1825 patients were included in the study. The incidence of symptomatic PE was 1.6%. All patients were screened with DUS of the bilateral lower extremities in a mean of 3.5 days (range: 0–18 days) after injury, and a mean of 3.6 days (range: 1–11 days) after surgery. Preoperative DUS detected DVT in 547 patients (30.0%), including 3.7% of patients with proximal DVT. 792 patients (43.4%) were found to have a DVT postoperatively, but only 6.2% of patients with proximal DVT. Proximal DVT was detected postoperatively of the represented fractures: 6.5% of the hip, 14.5% of the femoral shaft, 4.5% of the tibial plateau, 4.6% of the tibial shaft, 1.7% of the patellar, and 2.0% of the peri-ankle. Interestingly, the rate of DVT in an uninjured lower limb was significantly higher postoperatively compared to preoperatively (16.4% vs. 4.9%), however, only 0.2% of patients had proximal DVT.ConclusionsWhile the perioperative incidence of overall DVT is high following ILEFs, the majority were distal DVT, and the rate of symptomatic PE was low. Femoral shaft fractures were associated with the highest incidence for proximal DVT. The incidence was lower in more distal fractures. The majority of patients diagnosed with DVT postoperatively had already shown symptoms of DVT prior to surgery. DVT can occur in both the injured and uninjured leg, with an obviously higher incidence in the injured leg. The incidence of proximal DVT in an uninjured leg is rare.     

Incidence and propagation of infrageniculate deep venous thrombosis in trauma patients

BACKGROUND: The incidence and propagation of thrombosis involving vessels distal to the popliteal vein has not been clearly defined in trauma patients. Our aim was to determine the incidence and rate of propagation of infrageniculate deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in a trauma population and identify potential risk factors specific to propagation. METHODS: Retrospective review of all trauma admissions between the years 2001 and 2003 was conducted. Only those 18 years or older with an isolated infrageniculate DVT who underwent a lower extremity venous duplex scan during admission were included in the study. Nature of injury, injury severity score (ISS), method of DVT prophylaxis, thrombus location, and risk factors for hypercoagulable states were recorded. RESULTS: During the study period, 698 trauma admissions were included, and 109 (15.7%) with infrageniculate DVT were identified. Thirty-nine (35.7%) had thrombus propagation (14 suprageniculate and 25 infrageniculate) with a mean ISS of 27.6. Seventy (64.3%) had infrageniculate DVT without propagation and a mean ISS of 19.6. Thirty-eight (97%) patients with propagating infrageniculate DVT had received mechanical prophylaxis, and 33 (84%) also received chemical prophylaxis. The 14 patients with suprageniculate thrombus propagation were the most severely injured (mean ISS = 35.1). Elevated ISS, operation, age < or =62 years, and intensive care unit admission were positively correlated with propagation of infrageniculate DVT. CONCLUSION: The incidence and propagation of infrageniculate DVT in an aggressively prophylaxed trauma population are greater than previously reported. The clinical significance of isolated infrageniculate DVT remains to be determined, but when associated with a multiple injury trauma, the patient may be at risk for future suprageniculate DVT formation and may benefit from therapeutic anticoagulation.     

Symptomatic venous thromboembolism in Asian major trauma patients: incidence, presentation and risk factors

Background

Trauma patients are known to be at increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), and pulmonary embolism (PE) is one of the preventable causes of mortality in trauma patients. The incidence of VTE in Asian populations was believed to be lower than in Caucasians, but the recent literature suggests that this is not the case. The purpose of this study was to assess the incidence of VTE in Asian major trauma patients and to examine the manner of presentation, use of prophylaxis and risk factors for VTE. While other studies of VTE have addressed general and high-risk populations within Asia, our study is one of the few to examine Asian major trauma patients.

Methods

Data for all patients with VTE were extracted from the Singapore General Hospital trauma database over a 10-year period from 1998 to 2007. Patient profiles and clinical factors were compared to patients without a diagnosis of VTE admitted with injuries in the same time period.

Results

There were 8,615 patients entered into our database in this 10-year period. Thirty-four patients had VTE, with an overall incidence of 0.39 %. Thirteen patients had pulmonary embolism, an incidence of 0.15 %. Of note, 30 % of patients with deep vein thrombosis (DVT) presented with fever alone without limb symptoms. Almost all 34 patients who developed VTE had either head injury, a spinal cord injury or a pelvic/extremity injury. Eighteen patients had head injury, 22 patients sustained pelvic or extremity injury, and three patients had spinal cord injury with paraplegia. Head injury and spinal cord injury with neurologic sequelae were statistically significant risk factors for VTE (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

The incidence of symptomatic VTE in the Asian trauma population is no lower than in the West. The incidence found in this study is similar to the incidence of VTE according to a study using data from the American national trauma data bank using similar study methods and with a similar study population. It is also higher than the incidence in the literature for general post-surgical Asian patients. Fever was the presenting factor in some patients and screening for VTE should not be forgotten when assessing fever in the trauma patient. The strong association between head injury, spinal cord injury and VTE confirms that we should pay special attention to VTE prophylaxis for our patients with these injuries.     

Acute complications associated with greenfield filter insertion in high-risk trauma patients

BACKGROUND: Use of Greenfield filters (GFs) to prevent fatal pulmonary embolism (PE) in trauma patients is generally well accepted. Nonetheless, a surprisingly small number of trauma surgeons insert filters in their patients. Among the reasons cited is fear of complications. METHODS: We observed three femoral arteriovenous fistulae (AVF) in trauma patients who had inferior vena caval placement of filters for PE prophylaxis in one 12-month period (academic year 1999). In an effort to document the magnitude of this problem, we evaluated trauma patients who had a GF inserted in academic year 2000. RESULTS: During that year, 133 consecutive patients (8.6% of trauma admissions) received 133 GFs through a percutaneous approach. The most common isolated indications for GF insertion included closed head injuries (n = 28), multiple long bone fractures (n = 27), pelvic and acetabular fractures (n = 6), spinal cord injuries (n = 16), and vertebral fractures (n = 3). Five patients had documented deep venous thrombosis (DVT) diagnosed by duplex ultrasonography before GF placement, and 11 patients had other indications requiring a filter. There were 37 patients with more than one indication requiring filter placement. Most patients (57%) underwent preinsertion duplex scanning of their lower extremity veins; 77% of patients underwent postinsertion scanning. Filters were inserted an average of 6.8 +/- 0.6 (SE) days after trauma. No AVF were suspected clinically or detected ultrasonographically. No operative or postoperative complications occurred. DVT was observed in 30% of patients despite 92% prophylaxis; there was a 26% incidence of de novo thrombi detected. None of the patients evidenced DVT clinically. CONCLUSION: Our data indicate that complications of GF insertion for prophylaxis against PE from DVT complicating trauma patients continue to be negligible. In addition, the incidence of insertion-site thrombosis may be lower than expected. Moreover, femoral AVF is a rare complication of this procedure.     

Management and short-term patency of lower extremity venous injuries with various repairs

BACKGROUND: Although several methods of repair of extremity venous injuries have been shown to be efficacious, patency rates have varied significantly from center to center. METHODS: A retrospective review was made of treatment outcomes of adult and pediatric patients with major venous injuries of the lower extremity. RESULTS: From 1997 to 2002, 82 patients sustained 86 major lower extremity venous injuries. Venous injuries were treated with primary repair in 27, complex repair in 37 (autogenous vein, 10, and ringed polytetrafluoroethylene [PTFE], 27) and ligation in 20. Prior to repair, temporary intraluminal venous shunts were used in 18 patients. Follow-up duplex imaging or venography or both were performed on 42 extremities at a mean of 10.9 +/- 7.1 days after repair with an overall patency rate of 73.8% (primary repair 76.5%; autogenous vein graft 66.7%; and PTFE 73.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Overall early patency rate of venous repairs performed by an experienced trauma team is similar irrespective of the type of repair. The use of temporary intraluminal shunts is acceptable in selected circumstances, while ringed PTFE grafts are reasonable alternatives when the contralateral saphenous vein is too small.