Darbepoetin alfa: a new therapy for the management of anaemia associated with chronic kidney disease

Darbepoetin alfa (Aranesp^®, Amgen, Inc., Thousand Oaks, California) is a new erythropoietic protein that corrects anaemia associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD) in the majority of patients. Darbepoetin alfa contains five N-linked carbohydrate chains compared with three in recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO). The two additional sialic acid-containing carbohydrate chains prolong the serum half-life of darbepoetin alfa, resulting in greater biological activity and a reduced dosing frequency compared with rHuEPO. Clinical studies in patients with CKD have demonstrated that darbepoetin alfa is effective in correcting anaemia in rHuEPO-naive patients and in patients who have been converted from rHuEPO therapy. Darbepoetin alfa provides long-term maintenance of haemoglobin levels when administered once weekly or once every other week, with the possibility of once-monthly dosing in some patients. Darbepoetin alfa is well tolerated and has a safety profile similar to that of rHuEPO. Owing to its half-life being three times longer than rHuEPO, darbepoetin alfa can be administered at an extended dosing interval, without compromising efficacy. Lessfrequent dosing has potential benefits for both patients with CKD and healthcare providers. These benefits include reduced visits to the clinic, fewer injections and a reduced demand on staff and treatment facilities.     

Darbepoetin alfa: a new therapy for the management of anaemia associated with chronic kidney disease

Darbepoetin alfa (Aranesp, Amgen, Inc., Thousand Oaks, California) is a new erythropoietic protein that corrects anaemia associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD) in the majority of patients. Darbepoetin alfa contains five N-linked carbohydrate chains compared with three in recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO). The two additional sialic acid-containing carbohydrate chains prolong the serum half-life of darbepoetin alfa, resulting in greater biological activity and a reduced dosing frequency compared with rHuEPO. Clinical studies in patients with CKD have demonstrated that darbepoetin alfa is effective in correcting anaemia in rHuEPO-naive patients and in patients who have been converted from rHuEPO therapy. Darbepoetin alfa provides long-term maintenance of haemoglobin levels when administered once weekly or once every other week, with the possibility of once-monthly dosing in some patients. Darbepoetin alfa is well tolerated and has a safety profile similar to that of rHuEPO. Owing to its half-life being three times longer than rHuEPO, darbepoetin alfa can be administered at an extended dosing interval, without compromising efficacy. Lessfrequent dosing has potential benefits for both patients with CKD and healthcare providers. These benefits include reduced visits to the clinic, fewer injections and a reduced demand on staff and treatment facilities.     

Darbepoetin alfa: a new approach to the treatment of chemotherapy-induced anaemia

Chemotherapy-induced anaemia has important consequences on the quality of life and social function of cancer patients. The finding of erythropoietin (EPO) deficiency in these patients led to the therapeutic development of erythropoietic proteins. Darbepoetin alfa (Aranesp^®, Amgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, California), a new erythropoietic growth factor, has eight more sialic acids than epoetin alfa. The increased sialic acid content confers a three-fold longer half-life and allows the drug to be administered less frequently than epoetin alfa. Darbepoetin alfa affects the same early haematopoietic cells as epoetin alfa and the endogenous hormone EPO. Preclinical pharmacokinetic studies suggest that the intrinsic pharmacological properties of darbepoetin alfa are comparable to those of epoetin alfa, but that the increased sialic acid content allows for less-frequent administration with superior performance. Darbepoetin alfa has been shown to have safe clinical efficacy in a variety of tumour settings and with several types of chemotherapy.     

Darbepoetin alfa: a new approach to the treatment of chemotherapy-induced anaemia

Chemotherapy-induced anaemia has important consequences on the quality of life and social function of cancer patients. The finding of erythropoietin (EPO) deficiency in these patients led to the therapeutic development of erythropoietic proteins. Darbepoetin alfa (Aranesp), Amgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, California), a new erythropoietic growth factor, has eight more sialic acids than epoetin alfa. The increased sialic acid content confers a three-fold longer half-life and allows the drug to be administered less frequently than epoetin alfa. Darbepoetin alfa affects the same early haematopoietic cells as epoetin alfa and the endogenous hormone EPO. Preclinical pharmacokinetic studies suggest that the intrinsic pharmacological properties of darbepoetin alfa are comparable to those of epoetin alfa, but that the increased sialic acid content allows for less-frequent administration with superior performance. Darbepoetin alfa has been shown to have safe clinical efficacy in a variety of tumour settings and with several types of chemotherapy.     

Unit dosing of darbepoetin alfa for thetreatment of anemia in patients with end-stage renal disease being switched from recombinant human erythropoietin: Results of a phase IIIb, 27-week, multicenter, open-label study in Greek patients

Background:

Darbepoetin alfa is an erythropoietis-stimulating glycoprotein with a ∼3-fold longer t1/2 and greater biological activity compared with recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO).

Objective:

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy andtolerability of long-term (24-week) darbepoetin alfa treatment in maintaining hemoglobin (Hb) concentrations in the target range of 10 to 13 g/dL in patients undergoing dialysis; the patients were switched from rHuEPO to a less-frequent dosing regimen of darbepoetin alfa without an increase in dose.

Methods:

In this Phase IIlb, open-label, multicenter study, patients withend-stage renal disease (ESRD) undergoing dialysis who were receiving rHuEPO BIW or TIW at baseline were switched to darbepoetin alfa QW; patients receiving rHuEPO QW were switched to darbepoetin alfa Q2W Administration of darbepoetin alfa was by the same route as previous rHuEPO administration (IV or SC). Patients received darbepoetin alfa for 24 weeks, including a 20-week drug titration period followed by a 4-week, stable-dose evaluation period. The mode, dose, and frequency of administration of darbepoetin alfa were compared with those of baseline rHuEPO. Tolerability assessment was based on spontaneous reporting and laboratory tests (hematology, vital sign measurement, iron status, and biochemistry).

Results:

The study comprised 173 patients who were divided into 2 groups by route of administration (IV group, n = 146; SC group, n = 27). Mean (SE) adjusted increases in Hb concentration from baseline to the evaluation period for patients receiving darbepoetin alfa QW were 0.94 (0.32) g/dL and 0.38 (0.30) g/dL for the IV or SC routes, respectively (P = 0.004 and NS, respectively). For patients receiving darbepoetin alfa Q2W the mean (SE) adjusted increases in Hb concentration were 0.08 (0.53) g/dL and 0.48 (0.35) g/dL for the IV and SC routes, respectively (both, P = NS). No significant differences in IV/SC dose ratio were observed between the 2 routes of administration. In addition, no increases in darbepoetin alfa dose were observed. The most commonly reported adverse events were hypertension (8 patients [5%]) and vascular access thrombosis (4 [2%]). The incidence of treatment-related adverse events was 6 (3%).

Conclusions:

Darbepoetin alfa effectively maintained Hb concentrations within the target range without an increase in dose, even at a reduced dosing frequency. Overall, darbepoetin alfa was well tolerated.     

Treatment of renal anemia with darbepoetin alfa: results of an Austrian multicenter study

Darbepoetin alfa is a unique erythropoetic protein whose half-life is 3 times longer than that of recombinant human erythropoetin (rHuEPO). It corrects and maintains haemoglobin (Hb) concentrations at increased dosing intervals as compared to rHuEPO. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of darbepoetin alfa administered as fixed unit doses. Haemodialysis patients (n = 250) maintained on stable rHuEPO treatment 2-3 times weekly (n = 200) were switched to darbepoetin alfa once weekly (QW). Treatment for patients on rHuEPO QW (n = 50) was changed to darbepoetin alfa every other week (Q2W). The route of administration (i.v. or s.c.) was kept unchanged. The dose of darbepoetin alfa was titrated to maintain Hb levels at 10-13 g/dL between baseline and the evaluation period (weeks 21-24; primary endpoint). There was no clinically relevant change in mean Hb levels between baseline (11.69 g/dL) and evaluation (-0.28 g/dL (95% CI: -0.43; -0.13)). Mean weekly dose requirements of darbepoetin alfa decreased by 13.3% from 36.7 micrograms (95% CI: 33.9; 39.7) to 31.8 micrograms (95% CI: 28.7; 35.2). This decrease was more pronounced in patients receiving darbepoetin alfa i.v. (-18.4%) as compared to those receiving it s.c. (-6.4%). Darbepoetin alfa was well tolerated. Overall safety data were consistent with those observed in other studies. These data confirm that unit dosing with darbepoetin alfa at increased dosing intervals and reduced dose effectively and safely maintains Hb levels in haemodialysis patients.     

Darbepoetin alfa in the treatment of chemotherapy-induced anaemia

Background: Darbepoetin alfa is an erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA), with a longer half-life than previous recombinant human erythropoietins. After its initial development for anaemia due to renal insufficiency, an extensive clinical trial program has defined its role in cancer patients. Objective/methods: Review of the initial registration studies, further development and recent progress, guidelines for use in clinical practice (EORTC, ASCO/ASH), and specific focus on recent safety concerns. Results: Darbepoetin alfa significantly decreases the number of red blood cell transfusions in patients with chemotherapy-induced anaemia, and has been shown to improve health-related quality of life in several studies. The prolonged half-life allows a prolonged dosing interval. Administration every three weeks, a suitable schedule to synchronise with day 1 of many chemotherapy regimens, is as efficient as the initially registered weekly administration. Recent data strongly suggest that the addition of intravenous iron improves haemoglobin response rates. The use of these agents in clinical practice has to be according to the guidelines. Recent safety data reported a negative effect on survival when ESAs were used to treat anaemia that was either not chemotherapy related, or when used to maintain high levels of haemoglobin and prevent anaemia. All of these studies were not in accordance with existing guidelines, while safety data from clinical trials using ESAs according to the guidelines remain reassuring. Conclusion: Darbepoetin alfa has a well defined place in the treatment of chemotherapy-induced anaemia, and is safe when used in line with existing guidelines. Recent safety signals on cancer outcomes in studies not in accordance with these guidelines illustrate the need for further research into the complex interaction between anaemia and tumour hypoxia in cancer patients.     

Hemoglobin decline in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy without an erythropoiesis-stimulating agent

Purpose

The aim of this study was to examine the rate and timing of hemoglobin decline from <10 g/dL to <9 g/dL in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy.

Methods

Pooled data from the placebo arms of six randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) of darbepoetin alfa and data from an aggregated US community oncology clinic electronic medical records (EMR) database were analyzed. Patients had baseline hemoglobin ≥10 g/dL (RCTs) or baseline hemoglobin between ≥10 g/dL and <11 g/dL (EMR episodes) that declined to <10 g/dL at least once during the study period. The proportion of patients/episodes with hemoglobin decline to <9 g/dL by 3, 6, and 9 weeks without erythropoiesis-stimulating agents was estimated from data in each of the data sources, as was the rate of transfusions in the RCTs.

Results

Data from 411 patients receiving placebo in the RCTs and 10,523 patients (10,942 episodes) in the EMR database were analyzed. Forty percent and 35 % of RCT patients and EMR episodes, respectively, had a hemoglobin decline from <10 g/dL to <9 g/dL at week 3, 54 % and 43 % at week 6, and 58 % and 46 % at week 9. Of patients in the RCTs, 43 % required an RBC transfusion.

Conclusions

Hemoglobin can rapidly decline in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy with hemoglobin levels around 10 g/dL, particularly in patients ≥65 years of age. The rapid rate of hemoglobin decline in these patients should be considered for optimal anemia management.     

Speed of haemoglobin response in patients with cancer: a review of the erythropoietic proteins

Background Patients with cancer-related anaemia generally have a poor prognosis. Evidence suggests that an effective erythropoietic protein (epoetin)-mediated haemoglobin (Hb) response provides marked improvement in quality of life (QoL). An early Hb response to erythropoietic protein therapy in these patients would appear ideal but few studies have compared the speed of response to different erythropoietic proteins, or the potential benefits associated with an early Hb response. Results and discussion The pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profiles of commercially available erythropoietic proteins are reviewed along with available clinical data to examine Hb response and associated clinical outcomes for each of these agents. Randomised, head-to-head trials comparing epoetin alfa and darbepoetin alfa suggest that patients administered with epoetin alfa achieve a satisfactory Hb response significantly earlier than those given darbepoetin alfa, and with consistently lower monthly transfusion rates. Non-comparative studies support this, suggesting also that epoetin beta may provide a relatively faster Hb response in a greater number of patients than either epoetin alfa or darbepoetin alfa, irrespective of malignancy or chemotherapy type. Moreover, studies suggest consistently that a ‘front-loading’ dosing regimen with epoetin alfa does not convey improved speed of Hb response over epoetin beta administered according to current clinical practice guidelines. Conclusions Given the poor prognosis of anaemic patients with cancer, the use of an agent which provides clinical benefits quickly but with minimal thromboembolic risk, should be considered an essential component of anaemia management in these patients. However, more head-to-head studies are required to confirm the relative efficacy of currently available erythropoietic proteins.     

Darbepoetin alfa administration to achieve and maintain target hemoglobin levels for 1 year in patients with chronic kidney disease

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of every-other-week darbepoetin alfa therapy in treating anemia and maintaining hemoglobin levels for 1 year in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) who were not undergoing dialysis and who had not previously received erythropolesis-stimulating proteins (ESPs). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This multicenter 52-week study (evaluation period, weeks 20-32), a subanalysis of the Simplify the Treatment of Anemia with Aranesp study, enrolled patients with CKD who were not receiving dialysis (creatinine clearance < or =70 mL/min or estimated glomerular filtration rate [GFR] < or =60 mL/min). Patients evaluated in this analysis were not receiving ESPs, had hemoglobin concentrations less than 11 g/dL, and had transferrin saturation of 20% or higher during screening. Patients Initiated every-other-week darbepoetin alfa therapy at 0.75 microg/kg, with the dose subsequently titrated to maintain hemoglobin levels not to exceed 12 g/dL. The first study participant was enrolled on February 4, 2002, and the last participant completed the study on March 31, 2004. RESULTS: The analysis included 911 patients (mean [SD] age, 66.4 [14.2] years; 54.3% female; 55.3% white). The least squares mean evaluation hemoglobin concentration was 11.54 g/dL (95% confidence interval, 11.47-11.61 g/dL), and the change from baseline was 1.6 g/dL (95% confidence interval, 1.5-1.7 g/dL). The mean (SD) every-other-week darbepoetin alfa dose during evaluation was 44.5 (33.7) microg. Iron supplementation was administered to 573 patients (62.9%) during the study. Darbepoetin alfa was well tolerated throughout the study period. CONCLUSION: Darbepoetin alfa initiated every other week safely and effectively treated anemia and maintained hemoglobin for 1 year in patients with CKD who were not undergoing dialysis and who were not receiving prior ESP therapy.     

Effect of darbepoetin alfa administered once monthly on maintaining hemoglobin levels in older patients with chronic kidney disease

Background: The anemia of chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with increased hospitalizations, increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, and diminished quality of life in the elderly. Darbepoetin alfa is an erythropoiesis-stimulating agent that has been shown to be effective in treating anemia in patients with CKD (but not on dialysis) when administered using extended-dosing regimens.Objective: The purpose of this post hoc analysis was to examine the efficacy and safety profile of once-monthly (QM) darbepoetin alfa in study patients stratified according to age (ie, <65, 65–74, and ≥75 years).Methods: Patients with CKD but not on dialysis, receiving darbepoetin alfa every other week (Q2W), and with stable hemoglobin (Hb) levels between 11 and 13 g/dL, inclusive, were enrolled in this 33-week, multicenter, open-label, single-arm study. The study was carried out at 36 US centers and consisted of a 24-week QM darbepoetin alfa dose-titration period followed by an 8-week evaluation period. Hb levels were measured Q2W. Study results were stratified according to patient age (<65, 65–74, and ≥75 years).Results: A total of 152 patients (79 women, 73 men) were enrolled; 55 patients (36%) were <65 years of age, 46 (30%) were 65 to 74 years of age, and 51 (34%) were ≥75 years of age. In patients who received ≥1 dose of darbepoetin alfa, Hb levels ≥11 g/dL were maintained in 76%, 80%, and 71% of patients aged <65, 65 to 74, and ≥75 years, respectively. For patients who completed the study, the proportions who maintained Hb levels ≥11 g/dL were 83%, 88%, and 85%, respectively, for the 3 age groups. The safety profile of QM darbepoetin alfa in this study was consistent with that expected in patients with CKD not receiving dialysis.Conclusions: Darbepoetin alfa administered QM maintained Hb levels ≥11 g/dL in patients with CKD (not on dialysis) aged <65, 65 to 74, and ≥75 years. This treatment regimen may help optimize anemia management for older community-dwelling and long-term care patients.     

Comparison of effects of darbepoetin alfa and epoetin alfa on serum endothelin level and blood pressure

It is well known that epoetin alfa increases serum endothelin (ET)-1 and blood pressure. No data are available, however, on the effects of darbepoetin alfa on serum ET-1 and blood pressure. This study was conducted to compare the effects of darbepoetin alfa and epoetin alfa on serum ET-1 and blood pressure in patients on hemodialysis (HD). A total of 42 patients on HD were included in the study. Serum samples for measuring levels of ET-1 were taken 30 min after administration of epoetin alfa. After blood samples had been taken from all patients, epoetin alfa was changed to darbepoetin alfa. Three months after the start of darbepoetin alfa treatment, blood samples were taken to measure the same parameters. Mean arterial blood pressure was measured before recombinant human erythropoietin (EPO) administration and 30 min after EPO administration while patients were taking epoetin alfa or darbepoetin alfa. Injection of epoetin alfa or darbepoetin alfa significantly increased serum ET-1 levels compared with levels in those patients who were not on EPO therapy (P < .05). When the effects of epoetin alfa on serum ET-1 level were compared with those of darbepoetin alfa, the 2 types of EPO were found to increase serum ET-1 levels similarly (P > .05). Administration of epoetin alfa or darbepoetin alfa increased systolic and diastolic blood pressures significantly over values in the control group (P < .05). Serum systolic and diastolic blood pressures increased similarly after injection of epoetin alfa or darbepoetin alfa. Administration of darbepoetin alfa increased blood pressure in patients on HD in a way that was positively correlated with enhanced ET-1 release; a similar correlation was noted with epoetin alfa.     

Epoetin alfa increases hemoglobin levels and improves quality of life in anemic geriatric cancer patients receiving chemotherapy

Goal To evaluate epoetin alfa (EPO) treatment of anemia in geriatric cancer patients receiving chemotherapy, a retrospective subgroup analysis was conducted of anemic cancer patients ≥65 years of age from three 16-week community-based studies of thrice-weekly (TIW) or once-weekly (QW) EPO for chemotherapy-related anemia (CRA).Patients and methods Analyses were conducted on the overall geriatric population (≥65 years) and by age subgroup (65–74, 75–84, and ≥85 years), and compared with younger patients (<65 years) for each individual study and for pooled data.Main results Some 3,634 geriatric patients were compared with 3,467 younger patients. From baseline to final measurement, EPO therapy significantly increased Hb by 2.0 g/dl in patients ≥65 years and 1.9 g/dl in patients <65 years (P<0.0001) and reduced transfusion utilization in both groups (P<0.006). Both age groups also had significant improvements in quality of life (QOL), measured by the 100-mm Linear Analog Assessment Scale (LASA). In younger patients, mean LASA changes were significantly greater than those in geriatric patients (P<0.05); however, QOL improvements in both age groups were clinically meaningful. There were no significant differences across geriatric age subgroups or between TIW and QW regimens for Hb change or QOL improvement. Overall hematopoietic response rate to EPO was 65.4% for patients ≥65 years and 64.7% for patients <65 years. Predictors of greater hematopoietic response (based on a pooled analysis) included lower body weight, baseline Hb, and baseline serum erythropoietin levels; better tumor response; and history of EPO dose reduction and longer time on study.Conclusions Anemic geriatric patients receiving EPO for CRA responded comparably to younger patients <65 years and should be treated similarly.     

Anemia Management Trends in Hospital-Based Dialysis Centers (HBDCs), 2010 to 2013

Background

Few data have been reported on anemia management practices in hospital-based dialysis centers (HBDCs), which are uniquely different from other freestanding dialysis centers. Examining data from HBDCs would help determine if HBDCs and the general US dialysis population have similar trends related to how anemia is managed in dialysis patients.

Objective

Given recent changes in the prescribing information of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) and in end-stage renal disease–related health policy and reimbursement, this study describes trends in anemia management practices in HBDCs from January 2010 through March 2013.

Methods

Electronic medical records of 5404 adult hemodialysis patients in 50 US-based HBDCs were analyzed retrospectively. Patients included in the study cohort were aged ≥18 years and had at least 1 hemoglobin (Hb) measurement and 1 dose of an ESA between January 2010 and March 2013. End points included Hb concentration, darbepoetin alfa dosing, epoetin alfa dosing, and iron biomarkers (transferrin saturation and ferritin) and dosing.

Results

From 2010 to 2013, mean monthly Hb levels declined from 11.4 to 10.7 g/dL; the percentage of patients with mean monthly Hb levels <10 g/dL increased from 11.3% to 24.4%; and the percentage of patients with mean monthly Hb levels >12 g/dL declined from 30.1% to 11.2%. The median darbepoetin alfa cumulative 4-week dose also declined 38.8%, and the weekly epoetin alfa dose declined 24%. From January 2010 to March 2013, the percentage of patients with transferrin saturation >30% increased from 35.8% to 43.6%, the percentage of patients with ferritin levels >500 ng/mL increased from 62.0% to 77.9%, the percentage of patients with ferritin levels ≥800 ng/mL increased from 28.9% to 47.3%, and the median cumulative 4-week intravenous iron dose increased 50%.

Conclusions

These study results support growing evidence that meaningful changes have occurred over the last 3 years in how anemia is clinically managed in US hemodialysis patients. Study limitations include that changes in patient clinical/demographic characteristics over time were not controlled for and that study findings may not be applicable to HBDCs that have different patient populations and/or do not use an electronic medical record system. Continuing to evaluate anemia management practices in HBDCs would provide additional information on the risks and benefits of anemia care. Consistent with national data, the findings from this study indicate that from 2010 to 2013, HBDCs modified anemia management practices for dialysis patients, as evidenced by reductions in mean monthly Hb levels and ESA dosing and by increases in iron biomarkers and dosing.     

Outcomes of treatment pathways in outpatient treatment of low risk febrile neutropenic cancer patients

Background We treated low-risk febrile neutropenic cancer patients utilizing two standard outpatient antibiotic pathways: oral ampicillin/clavulanate (500 mg) and ciprofloxacin (500 mg) or intravenous ceftazidime (2 g) and clindamycin (600 mg) every 8 h. The objectives were to determine the success of outpatient treatment of low-risk febrile neutropenia, to identify factors predicting outpatient failure, and to determine mortality related to the febrile episode.Methods Eligibility criteria included solid tumor diagnosis, stable vital signs, temperature 38.0°C, absolute neutrophil count (ANC) of <1000/ml, patient compliance, no significant organ dysfunction, ability to tolerate oral medication and fluids for oral pathway, residence within 30 miles of the institution, 24-h caregiver, and telephone and transportation access.Results There were 257 febrile episodes in 191 patients meeting the criteria. Patients were treated during March 1998 through February 2000. Median age was 48 (range, 17–77) years, and 60% (n=153) had an entry ANC of <100/ml; 205 (80%) febrile episodes successfully responded to outpatient treatment, and 52 (20%) were hospitalized. Logistic regression analysis showed the following were related to hospitalization: mucositis >grade 2 (p <0.002); Zubrod performance status 2 (p=0.029); ANC <100/ml (p=0.039), and age 70 years (p=0.048).Conclusions Outpatient treatment of low-risk febrile neutropenic cancer patients utilizing standard treatment pathways is associated with minimal morbidity and mortality and should be considered an acceptable standard of care with appropriate infrastructure available to provide strict and careful follow-up while on treatment. Certain factors are associated with higher risk of hospitalization and should be further examined in eligible patients with low-risk febrile neutropenia.Presented at the 2002 American Society of Clinical Oncology, Orlando, Florida, USA.     

Clinical significance of anaemia associated with prolactin-secreting pituitary tumours in men

Background: An association between prolactin‐secreting pituitary adenomas and anaemia in male patients has been recently reported. Our aim has been to evaluate the prevalence of anaemia in men with prolactinomas and to assess the relationships between haemoglobin concentrations and pituitary function at diagnosis in these patients. Methods: In a retrospective analysis, 26 male patients with prolactinomas (22 macroprolactinomas and 4 microprolactinomas) were studied. Blood haemoglobin concentration, haematocrit value and baseline hormonal levels were collected at the time of prolactinoma diagnosis. The presence or absence of partial or total hypopituitarism was also evaluated at diagnosis. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess the presence of anaemia as a function of serum hormone concentrations and pituitary dysfunction. Results: Patient bearing macroprolactinomas showed significant lower haemoglobin concentrations than those found in patients with microprolactinomas (13.5 ± 1.2 g/dl vs. 15.1 ± 0.9 g/dl, p < 0.05). Anaemia (haemoglobin < 13 g/dl) was present in nine (34.6%) patients, all of them with macroprolactinomas. The degree of anaemia was mild (haemoglobin > 11 g/dl) in all patients. No correlation between haemoglobin and serum prolactin was found. Haemoglobin concentration was significantly lower in men with hypogonadism (n = 14) than in eugonadal men. Haemoglobin value was also significantly lower in patients with total hypopituitarism in comparison with patients with partial hypopituitarism (12.4 ± 1.0 g/dl, n = 7 vs. 14.0 ± 1.2 g/dl, n = 13, p = 0.007). The number of affected pituitary axes was found to be related with the presence of anaemia. Logistic regression analysis showed that anaemia was related with FT4 (OR 0.23; 95% CI 0.06–0.81, p = 0.02), cortisol (OR 0.81; 95% CI 0.68–0.96, p = 0.02) and the presence of hypopituitarism (OR 20.0; 95% CI 1.68–238.63, p = 0.02). Conclusions: Anaemia was found in about a third of men with prolactinomas. Our results also suggest that the presence of anaemia in these patients seems to be associated with panhypopituitarism.     

A multicenter retrospective cohort study of practice patterns and clinical outcomes of the use of darbepoetin alfa and epoetin alfa for chemotherapy-induced anemia

BACKGROUND: Darbepoetin alfa is the second erythropoietic protein to be approved for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA). In the clinical setting, darbepoetin alfa can be administered less frequently than epoetin alfa with similar efficacy. Practice patterns and outcomes associated with the use of darbepoetin alfa and epoetin alfa in the clinical setting have not been reported. OBJECTIVE: This study compared practice patterns and clinical outcomes of the use of darbepoetin alfa and epoetin alfa for CIA at oncology practices in the United States. METHODS: This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study. Data were abstracted from the medical charts of consecutive patients who began darbepoetin alfa treatment between August 1 and October 4, 2002, or epoetin alfa treatment between April 1 and July 31, 2002, and were receiving concurrent chemotherapy. These data were used to determine the initial dose and dosing schedule, dose changes, and changes in hemoglobin concentrations after 4, 8, and 12 weeks of treatment, adjusted for red blood cell (RBC) transfusions, and the incidence of RBC transfusions over time. To minimize potential bias, the study protocol defined specific end points and prespecified analytic techniques for assessing clinical outcomes with the 2 agents. RESULTS: The records of 1391 patients from 16 community and hospital outpatient oncology clinics were abstracted. Of these, 1293 patients (93.0%) received only 1 erythropoietic agent (darbepoetin alfa, 735 [56.8%]; epoetin alfa, 558 [43.2%]); the remainder received both agents. In the patients who received darbepoetin alfa, most (553 [75.2%]) received an initial dosage of 200 microg q2wk. A similar proportion (414 [74.2%]) received epoetin alfa at an initial dosage of 40,000 U qwk. As these were the regimens for the majority of patients whose records were abstracted, the results reported here are for these patients. The dose was increased in 63 darbepoetin alfa recipients (11.4%) and 58 epoetin alfa recipients (14.0%) at a median of 7 weeks. After 12 weeks, the 2 groups had an identical mean imputed change from baseline in hemoglobin concentration (1.0 g/dL), and the incidence of RBC transfusions during treatment was also similar between groups (darbepoetin alfa, 44553 [8.0%]; epoetin alfa, 39414 [9.4%]). CONCLUSIONS: Darbepoetin alfa 200 microg q2wk was used as a standard regimen for CIA at the 16 US oncology practices participating in this study. It appeared to be as effective as epoetin alfa 40,000 U qwk, with a reduced frequency of dosing.     

Extended dosing of darbepoetin alfa in patients with chronic kidney disease not on dialysis: a review of recent data.

Anemia is a common and serious complication of chronic kidney disease (CKD), which can be successfully and safely treated with erythropoiesis-stimulating proteins (ESPs). Darbepoetin alfa, a long-acting ESP, can be dosed less frequently than Epoetin alfa, thereby reducing the burden on patients and health care staff. This review summarizes recent clinical data supporting use of darbepoetin alfa at extended dosing intervals of once every 2 weeks and once monthly in patients with CKD not on dialysis.     

Observational Aranesp® Survey to Investigate the Q3W Schedule (OASIS): a prospective observational study of treatment of chemotherapy-induced anaemia with every 3 weeks darbepoetin alfa

Introduction  This prospective observational study examined the adherence to published European guidelines on erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) and the pattern of use and effect of darbepoetin alfa (DA) 500 μg once every 3 weeks (Q3W) for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced anaemia (CIA). Materials and methods  A total of 293 patients were included (263 solid tumour, 30 haematologic malignancy). Their mean age was 63 years, 51% were male, 57% had platinum-based chemotherapy. DA was started at a haemoglobin (Hb) level between 9 and 11 g/dL in 82% of patients. Results and discussion  In an analysis correcting for transfusions, 55% of patients achieved ≥2 g/dL increase in Hb, and a Hb level of >11 g/dL was reached in 81%. Transfusion rate was 27%. Most patients (70%) were treated in a Q3W chemotherapy, and planned synchronisation of chemotherapy and Q3W DA could be maintained in 76%. Conclusion  Adherence to European guidelines for DA treatment was good, and Q3W DA treatment was in synchronisation with Q3W chemotherapy in the majority of the patients, thereby reproducing the findings of a recent phase III study.     

Epoetin alfa versus darbepoetin alfa in chemotherapy-related anemia

OBJECTIVE: To review and compare the data concerning the clinical activity of epoetin alfa versus darbepoetin alfa when administered to patients with cancer who are experiencing treatment-related anemia. DATA SOURCES: English-language publications from the MEDLINE database (1990-June 2005), published articles, and meeting abstracts were reviewed. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Relevant data were extracted from published reports and abstracts on studies of humans with cancer who developed treatment-related anemia and were treated with epoetin alfa or darbepoetin alfa. DATA SYNTHESIS: Epoetin alfa and darbepoetin alfa are similar agents with identical indications for treatment of anemia in patients with cancer. Clinical trials have demonstrated that both agents can significantly improve hemoglobin levels, reduce transfusion requirements, and improve quality of life. Epoetin alfa is approved for administration at a dose of 150 units/kg subcutaneously 3 times per week, and darbepoetin alfa is approved for administration at a dose of 2.25 units/kg once a week. Clinical studies have demonstrated that epoetin alfa may be administered at 40,000 units once a week and that darbepoetin alfa may be administered at 200 microg every 2 weeks without loss of efficacy. Cost analysis, based on the average wholesale price of each drug alone administered for 12 weeks at Food and Drug Administration-approved doses, revealed that epoetin alfa is less expensive than darbepoetin alfa. When they are administered in the extended schedules, the cost of darbepoetin alfa is slightly less than that of epoetin alfa. However, the total expense associated with the extended schedule of either agent is further reduced by a reduction in other costs associated with drug administration. CONCLUSIONS: Epoetin alfa and darbepoetin alfa have identical indications for treatment of anemia in patients receiving cancer chemotherapy. Clinical trials have demonstrated similar activities with both agents. Darbepoetin alfa, with a longer half-life, can be administered less frequently, saving costs as well as reducing patient office visits.