A phase I study of weekly gemcitabine and docetaxel in patients with advanced cancer: a Hoosier Oncology Group Study

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of weekly gemcitabine plus docetaxel, a dose escalation trial of both drugs was developed with each administered weekly for 3 weeks out of 4. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Dose levels for gemcitabine (mg/m(2)) and docetaxel (mg/m(2)) were as follows: level 1: 600/25; level 2: 600/35; level 3: 750/35; and level 4: 900/35. Sixteen patients with adequate renal, hepatic, and hematologic function and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2 were treated. Primary sites included pancreas (12) and others (4). RESULTS: Three patients were treated at each dose level from level 1 through level 4. The dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was neutropenia, the maximum tolerated dose being 750 mg/m(2) of gemcitabine and 35 mg/m(2) of docetaxel. No grade 4 nonhematologic toxicity was seen. Three patients had grade 4 neutropenia. Of the 12 patients with pancreatic cancer, 1 had a partial remission and 7 had stable disease with a median duration of 8 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Gemcitabine and docetaxel can be safely administered weekly at a dose of 750 and 35 mg/m(2), respectively. The DLT was neutropenia. Disease stabilization suggests that this may be an active regimen in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.     

A phase I trial of weekly gemcitabine and concurrent radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer

This study investigated the maximum-tolerated dose of gemcitabine based on the frequency of dose-limiting toxicities of weekly gemcitabine treatment with concurrent radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Fifteen patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer that was histologically confirmed as adenocarcinoma were enrolled in this phase I trial of weekly gemcitabine (150-350 mg x m(-2)) with concurrent radiotherapy (50.4 Gy in 28 fractions). Gemcitabine was administered weekly as an intravenous 30-min infusion before radiotherapy for 6 weeks. Three of six patients at the dose of 350 mg x m(-2) of gemicitabine demonstrated dose-limiting toxicities involving neutropenia/ leukocytopenia and elevated transaminase, while nine patients at doses of 150 mg x m(-2) and 250 mg x m(-2) did not demonstrate any sign of dose-limiting toxicity. Of all 15 enrolled patients, six patients (40.0%) showed a partial response. More than 50% reduction of serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 level was observed in 13 (92.9%) of 14 patients who had pretreatment carbohydrate antigen 19-9 levels of 100 U x ml(-1) or greater. The maximum-tolerated dose of weekly gemcitabine with concurrent radiotherapy was 250 mg x m(-2), and this regimen may have substantial antitumour activity for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer. A phase II trial of weekly gemcitabine at the dose of 250 mg x m(-2) with concurrent radiation in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer is now underway.     

Phase I study of fixed dose rate infusion of gemcitabine in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the feasible dose of gemcitabine when administered as a fixed dose rate infusion (10 mg/m(2)/min) on a weekly schedule to Japanese patients with unresectable advanced pancreatic cancer. METHODS: Patients were required to have histologically or cytologically proven locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer for which they had received no previous chemotherapy. Gemcitabine was administered intravenously weekly for three consecutive weeks every 4 weeks. Patients at three dose levels were scheduled to receive escalating doses of gemcitabine: 1000 mg/m(2) over 100 min (Level 1), 1200 mg/m(2) over 120 min (Level 2) and 1500 mg/m(2) over 150 min (Level 3). RESULTS: A total of 16 patients were enrolled in this study between December 2003 and September 2004. Maximum-tolerated dose was not reached during the first course. Dose-limiting toxicity was Grade 4 neutropenia. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was observed at Level 3 in all six patients in the first course, and administration of gemcitabine on Day 8 or 15 was skipped in all six patients. Non-hematologic toxicity was mild and the most common symptoms were anorexia, nausea and vomiting. Partial response was achieved in 1 of the 17 patients (7%). Median overall survival was 7.3 months. CONCLUSIONS: Gemcitabine administered at a rate of 10 mg/m(2)/min was tolerated up to 1500 mg/m(2), but 1200 mg/m(2) represented a more appropriate recommended dose in further studies owing to neutropenia in Japanese patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.     

A phase I study of radiation therapy and twice-weekly gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer

PURPOSE: In vitro studies suggest that low-dose gemcitabine sensitizes cells to radiation therapy and that this effect persists for 48 h after drug exposure. Cisplatin is a radiation sensitizer and is also synergistic with gemcitabine in some in vitro tumor systems. Gemcitabine's radiosensitizing properties can theoretically be exploited by twice-weekly administration. This study assessed toxicity in patients with pancreatic cancer treated with radiation therapy, gemcitabine, and cisplatin. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with locally advanced pancreatic or gastric cancer were eligible. Gemcitabine and cisplatin were given twice weekly for 3 weeks during radiation therapy (50.4 Gy in 28 fractions). The starting dose of gemcitabine was 5 mg/m(2) i.v. The starting dose for cisplatin was 5 mg/m(2). Chemotherapy doses escalated every 3 to 6 patients according to a standard Phase I study design. RESULTS: Twenty-four evaluable patients, all with pancreatic cancer, were treated on this protocol. Grade 3 neutropenia occurred in 2 patients, Grade 3 thrombocytopenia occurred in 2, and Grade 4 lymphopenia occurred in 1. There was no clear relationship between chemotherapy dose and hematologic toxicity. The most common Grade 3-4 nonhematologic toxic responses were vomiting (7 patients) and nausea (7 patients). Dose-limiting toxicity consisting of Grade 4 nausea and vomiting occurred in 2 of 3 patients at dose Level 6 (gemcitabine 45 mg/m(2) i.v. and cisplatin 10 mg/m(2) i.v.). Six patients were treated at dose Level 5 (gemcitabine 30 mg/m(2) i.v. and cisplatin 10 mg/m(2) i.v.) without dose-limiting toxicity. CONCLUSION: Gemcitabine 30 mg/m(2) i.v. twice weekly and cisplatin 10 mg/m(2) i.v. twice weekly may be given concurrently with radiation therapy (50.4 Gy in 28 fractions) with acceptable toxicity.     

Cetuximab, a monoclonal antibody targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor, in combination with gemcitabine for advanced pancreatic cancer: a multicenter phase II Trial.

PURPOSE: To determine the response rate, time to disease progression, survival duration and rate, and toxicity with the combination of cetuximab and gemcitabine in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-expressing advanced pancreatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with measurable locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer who had never received chemotherapy for their advanced disease and had immunohistochemical evidence of EGFR expression were eligible for the multicenter phase II trial. Patients were treated with cetuximab at an initial dose of 400 mg/m(2), followed by 250 mg/m(2) weekly for 7 weeks. Gemcitabine was administered at 1,000 mg/m(2) for 7 weeks, followed by 1 week of rest. In subsequent cycles, cetuximab was administered weekly, and gemcitabine was administered weekly for 3 weeks every 4 weeks. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients were screened for EGFR expression, 58 patients (95%) had at least 1+ staining, and 41 were enrolled onto the trial. Five patients (12.2%) achieved a partial response, and 26 (63.4%) had stable disease. The median time to disease progression was 3.8 months, and the median overall survival duration was 7.1 months. One-year progression-free survival and overall survival rates were 12% and 31.7%, respectively. The most frequently reported grade 3 or 4 adverse events were neutropenia (39.0%), asthenia (22.0%), abdominal pain (22.0%), and thrombocytopenia (17.1%). CONCLUSION: Cetuximab in combination with gemcitabine showed promising activity against advanced pancreatic cancer. Further clinical investigation is warranted.     

Treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer with a combination of gemcitabine and 5-fluorouracil: a single center phase II study

AIM: To determine the activity and toxicity of a combination of weekly gemcitabine and 5-fluorouracil bolus intravenously in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-one patients with previously untreated metastatic pancreatic cancer were included in this phase II study. The schedule was gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2 i.v.) and 5-fluorouracil (500 mg/m2 bolus i.v.) weekly for 3 weeks every month. RESULTS: Four patients (19%) achieved a partial response and three stable disease. A clinical benefit was obtained in 7 patients (33%). Median survival for all the patients was 6 months. The treatment was well tolerated and toxicity was mild. WHO grade 3 leukopenia occurred in 2 (9.5%) patients, grade 3 anemia in 4 (19%) patients, grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia in 4 (19%) patients, grade 1 diarrhea in 1 (4.7%) patient and grade 1 mucositis in 3 (14.2%) patients. CONCLUSION: The weekly administration of gemcitabine combined with 5-fluorouracil bolus i.v. is an active and well-tolerated regimen in metastatic pancreatic cancer. However, its efficacy is relatively limited.     

Phase I trial and pharmacokinetics of gemcitabine in children with advanced solid tumors.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum tolerated dose, toxicity, and pharmacokinetics of gemcitabine in children with refractory solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Gemcitabine was given as a 30-minute infusion for 2 or 3 consecutive weeks every 4 weeks, to 42 patients aged 1 to 21 years. Doses of 1000, 1200 and 1500 mg/m(2) were administered for 3 weeks. Subsequently, gemcitabine was given for only 2 consecutive weeks at 1500, 1800, and 2100 mg/m(2). Plasma concentrations of gemcitabine and its metabolite, 2'2'-difluorodeoxyuridine, were measured in 28 patients. RESULTS: Forty patients who received 132 courses of gemcitabine were assessable for toxicity. The maximum tolerated dose of gemcitabine given weekly for 3 weeks was 1200 mg/m(2). Dose-limiting toxicity was not seen in one-third of children treated at any doses given for 2 weeks. The major toxicity was myelosuppression in three of five patients at 1500 mg/m(2) for 3 weeks, and one of seven patients at 1800 mg/m(2) for 2 weeks. Other serious adverse events were somnolence, fever and hypotension, and rash in three patients. Gemcitabine plasma concentration-time data were fit to a one- (n = 5) or two-compartment (n = 23) open model. Mean gemcitabine clearance and half-life values were 2140 mL/min/m(2) and 13.7 minutes, respectively. One patient with pancreatic cancer had a partial response. Seven patients had stable disease for 2 to 17 months. CONCLUSION: Gemcitabine given by 30-minute infusion for 2 or 3 consecutive weeks every 4 weeks was tolerated well by children at doses of 2100 mg/m(2) and 1200 mg/m(2), respectively.     

Phase I study of gemcitabine using a once every 2 weeks schedule.

Gemcitabine (2'',2''-difluorodeoxycytidine) is a novel nucleoside analogue. As part of a series of studies to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of gemcitabine and the most appropriate schedule, a two-centre phase I study of gemcitabine was undertaken in patients with advanced refractory solid tumours using a once every 2 weeks schedule. Fifty-two patients were entered into the study at 14 different dose levels (40-5700 mg m-2). Weekly evaluations for toxicity were performed and the MTD for this once every 2 weeks schedule was 5700 mg m-2. The dose-limiting toxicity was myelosuppression, with neutropenia being most significant. Other toxicities were nausea, vomiting, fever and asthenia. One minor response was seen in a heavily pretreated breast cancer patient treated at 1200 mg m-2. Preclinical studies suggest that the efficacy of gemcitabine is more schedule than dose related, and it is concluded that this is not the most appropriate dosing schedule for gemcitabine. However, this study demonstrates the safety profile of gemcitabine, as doses over fourfold greater than that recommended for the weekly schedule of 1000 mg m-2 could be tolerated.     

A phase I-II study of gemcitabine and docetaxel in advanced pancreatic cancer: a report from the Italian Group for the Study of Digestive Tract Cancer (GISCAD).

Background: Gemcitabine and docetaxel have been claimed to be active single agents in advanced pancreatic cancer. We determined the maximum tolerable dose of docetaxel combined with a weekly fixed dose of gemcitabine and assessed the activity of this combination in advanced pancreatic cancer.Patients and methods: Phase I. Patients were treated with gemcitabine on days 1 and 8, every three weeks, at a fixed dose of 1,000 mg/m²; docetaxel was given at escalating doses starting from 70 mg/m² on day 8. Phase II. In accord with the optimal two-stage phase II study design, 18 patients were treated with gemcitabine (1000 mg/m²) and the maximum tolerable dose of docetaxel (70 mg/m²).Results: Phase I. Dose-limiting toxicities occurred at the second dose level of docetaxel (80 mg/m²), with all three patients developing grades 3 or 4 neutropenia. Consequently, the dose tested in the phase II study was 70 mg/m². Phase II. In the 18 patients enrolled in the study, we registered only one partial response. The time to progression was 3 months, and the median treatment survival was 5.4 months. Grade 3–4 toxicities consisted of neutropenia (three episodes) and thrombocytopenia (two episodes). Furthermore, 10 patients complained of grade 3 fatigue.Conclusions: The addition of docetaxel to gemcitabine does not appear to be useful in advanced pancreatic cancer, since gemcitabine alone achieves similar results.     

Phase II trial of combined regional hyperthermia and gemcitabine for locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer

Purpose: Despite advances in cancer therapy, treating pancreatic cancer remains one of the major challenges in the field of medical oncology. We conducted this phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of regional hyperthermia combined with gemcitabine for the treatment of unresectable advanced pancreatic cancer.

Methods: Eligibility criteria included histologically proven, locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer. Gemcitabine was administered intravenously at a dose of 1000?mg/m² on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks. Regional hyperthermia was performed once weekly, 1 day preceding or following gemcitabine administration. The primary end point was the 1-year survival rate. Secondary objectives were determination of tumour response and safety.

Results: We enrolled 18 patients with advanced pancreatic cancer between November 2008 and May 2010. The major grade 3–4 adverse events were neutropenia and anaemia; however, there were no episodes of infection. The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (ORR + stable disease) were 11.1% and 61.1%, respectively. Median overall survival (OS) was 8 months, and the 1-year survival rate was 33.3%. Median OS of patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer was 17.7 months.

Conclusions: Regional hyperthermia combined with gemcitabine is well tolerated and active in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer.     

Phase II study of radiotherapy combined with gemcitabine for locally advanced pancreatic cancer

Gemcitabine has been reported to be a potent radiosensitiser in human pancreatic cell lines. This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of radiotherapy combined with gemcitabine for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. In all, 42 patients with pancreatic cancer that was unresectable but confined to the pancreatic region were treated with external-beam radiation (50.4 Gy in 28 fractions over 5.5 weeks) and weekly gemcitabine (250 mg m(-2), 30-min infusion). Maintenance gemcitabine (1000 mg m(-2) weekly x 3 every 4 weeks) was initiated 1 month after the completion of the chemoradiotherapy and continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Of the 42 patients, 38 (90%) completed the scheduled course of chemoradiotherapy. The major toxicity was leucopenia and anorexia. There was one death attributed to duodenal bleeding and sepsis. The median survival time was 9.5 months and the 1-year survival rate was 28%. The median progression-free survival time was 4.4 months. In 35 patients with documented disease progression at the time of analysis, 34 (97%) showed distant metastasis as the cause of the initial disease progression. The chemoradiotherapy used in this study has a moderate activity against locally advanced pancreatic cancer and an acceptable toxicity profile. Future investigations for treatment with more systemic effects are warranted.     

Phase I study of combination chemotherapy with gemcitabine and irinotecan for non-small cell lung cancer

A phase I study combining a fixed dose of gemcitabine with differing doses of CPT-11 every two weeks for previously treated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 21 patients with previously treated non-small cell lung cancer were treated every two weeks with CPT-11 followed by gemcitabine. The gemcitabine dose was fixed at 1000 mg/m2. The starting dose of CPT-11 (50 mg/m2) was then escalated different patients in 25 mg/m2 increments until 150 mg/m2 (level 5), the recommended dose as a single agent in Japan. RESULTS: Dose-limiting toxicity was only observed at level 5, in three of nine patients receiving the highest dose of CPT-11. One patient had grade 3 diarrhea, and two could not continue chemotherapy with grade 1 diarrhea or grade 1 neutropenia on day 15. Hematologic toxicity with this combination regimen, however, was generally mild. No grade 4 neutropenia, and only one case of grade 3 leukopenia was noted at level 5. Compliance with the combination regimen was good and there was no cumulative toxicity with the subsequent courses. Twenty-five courses of therapy were given at level 5 and the percentage of actual delivered doses/planned doses was 82%. CONCLUSIONS: The combination chemotherapy has only very mild toxicity and dose which can be recommended with this regimen are 1000 mg/m2 for gemcitabine and 150 mg/m2 for CPT-11 every two weeks.     

Phase I trial of twice-weekly gemcitabine and concurrent radiation in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose, dose-limiting toxicities, and potential antitumor activity of twice-weekly gemcitabine and concurrent radiation in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Nineteen patients with histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the pancreas were studied at the Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. The initial dose of gemcitabine was 20 mg/m(2) by 30-minute intravenous infusion each Monday and Thursday for 5 weeks concurrent with 50.4 Gy of radiation to the pancreas. Gemcitabine doses were escalated in 20-mg/m(2) increments in successive cohorts of three to six additional patients until dose-limiting toxicity was observed. RESULTS: The dose-limiting toxicities at 60 mg/m(2) given twice-weekly were nausea/vomiting, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia. Twice-weekly gemcitabine at a 40-mg/m(2) dose was well tolerated. Of the eight patients eligible for a minimum follow-up of 12 months, three remain alive, one of whom has no evidence of disease progression. CONCLUSION: A dose of twice-weekly gemcitabine at 40 mg/m(2) produced mild thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, nausea, and vomiting when delivered with concurrent radiation to the upper abdomen in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. These data suggest this regimen is well tolerated and may possess significant activity. These data and other observations have resulted in a phase II Cancer and Leukemia Group B study to ascertain the efficacy of this treatment regimen in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer.     

Phase I study of irinotecan and gemcitabine in previously untreated patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND: Irinotecan and gemcitabine are effective against non-small cell lung cancer. We conducted a phase I study of the combined use of irinotecan and gemcitabine in previously untreated patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer to determine dose-limiting toxicities and maximum tolerated dose. METHODS: Patients were treated with irinotecan followed by gemcitabine on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks. Gemcitabine dose was fixed at 1000 mg/m2, and irinotecan dose was increased from 60 mg/m2. RESULTS: A total of 16 patients was enrolled. Maximum tolerated dose of irinotecan was determined up to level 3 (irinotecan 100 mg/m2). In Japan, the maximum approved weekly dose of irinotecan is 100 mg/m2, so this was the dose that was used. Only very mild hematological and non-hematological toxicities were noted. CONCLUSION: Use of 100 mg/m2 irinotecan followed by 1000 mg/m2 gemcitabine on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks warrants a phase II study.     

Phase I-II study of gemcitabine and fluorouracil as a continuous infusion in patients with pancreatic cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicities, and efficacy of gemcitabine combined with fluorouracil (5-FU) in patients with pancreatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with measurable, locally advanced, nonresectable or metastatic pancreatic cancer were candidates for the study. 5-FU was given via protracted venous infusion (PVI) at a fixed dosage of 200 mg/m2/d, and gemcitabine was administered weekly for 3 consecutive weeks every 4 weeks. The initial dose of gemcitabine was 700 mg/m2 and was escalated in increments of 100 mg/m2/wk until the appearance of severe toxicity. Measurements of efficacy included the following: response rate; clinical benefit response, which is a composite measurement of pain, performance status, and weight loss; time to disease progression; and survival. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients received a total of 109 courses. Dose-limiting toxicity, which consisted of grade 4 neutropenia with fever (one patient) and grade 4 thrombocytopenia (one patient), was observed in two of three patients treated with 1,100 mg/m2/wk of gemcitabine. On the basis of these results, the MTD of gemcitabine with 5-FU via PVI on this schedule was 1,000 mg/m2. Sixteen patients developed grade 3-4 neutropenia, and three patients developed grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia. Grade 3-4 nonhematologic toxicity consisted of diarrhea (two patients) and cutaneous toxicity, asthenia, edema, mucositis, and nausea and vomiting (one patient each). The delivered dose-intensity of gemcitabine was similar at the 1,000 mg/m2 dose level (599 mg/m2/wk) as at the 900 mg/m2 (601 mg/m2/wk) dose level. For this reason, the recommended dose of gemcitabine for phase II evaluation on this schedule was 900 mg/m2. Five patients had objective responses (one complete response and four partial responses; response rate, 19.2%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 6.5 to 39.3), and 10 patients had improvement of disease-related symptoms (45%; 95% CI, 24 to 67). After a median follow-up of 17.7 months (range, 7.8 to 24.8 months), the median progression-free survival and overall survival times were 7.4 months (95% CI, 3.3 to 11.4) and 10.3 months (95% CI, 8.1 to 12.5), respectively. CONCLUSION: The MTD of gemcitabine when combined with 5-FU via PVI on this schedule was 1,000 mg/m2/ wk; however, on the basis of administered dose-intensity, the recommended dose for additional investigation is 900 mg/m2. This combination chemotherapy regimen was well tolerated and showed promising antitumor activity in the treatment of pancreatic cancer.     

A Phase II trial of fixed dose rate gemcitabine in patients with advanced biliary tree carcinoma

Gemcitabine is a commonly used chemotherapy for biliary tree carcinomas, achieving response rates of 10% to 60%. Preclinical studies indicate that fixed dose rate infusion optimizes accumulation of gemcitabine triphosphate and may enhance the clinical activity of gemcitabine. We conducted a phase II study of fixed dose rate gemcitabine in 15 chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder carcinoma. Gemcitabine was administered at a dose of 1500 mg/m2 over 150 minutes weekly for 3 weeks every 28 days. Fourteen patients were evaluable for response. No complete or partial responses were observed. Two patients (13%) had stable disease lasting a median of 9 weeks. The median time to progression was 9 weeks; median survival was 20 weeks. There was considerable grade 3/4 hematologic toxicity, including neutropenia in 49% of patients, leukopenia in 40%, anemia in 27%, and thrombocytopenia in 27%. Grade 3/4 nonhematologic toxicities were minimal. We conclude that fixed dose rate gemcitabine results in significant myelosuppression and has minimal activity in patients with biliary tree carcinoma.     

Activity of gemcitabine and continuous infusion fluorouracil in advanced pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Gemcitabine has been shown to improve survival and quality of life parameters compared to fluorouracil alone in advanced pancreatic cancer [J Clin Oncol 1997;15:2403-2413]. However, fluorouracil was given as a weekly bolus in that study and other administration schedules might be more effective. The objective of this trial was to determine the activity and toxicity of gemcitabine in combination with continuous infusion (CI) fluorouracil in advanced pancreatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Chemotherapy-na?ve patients with measurable advanced adenocarcinoma of the pancreas were treated with gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) intravenously weekly x 3 followed by 1 week of rest every 4 weeks and 200 mg/m(2)/day CI fluorouracil until disease progression or limiting toxicity. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were evaluable for response and toxicity. Objective partial responses were documented in 5 patients (20%; 95% confidence interval 6.8-40.7%) and disease stabilization or minor responses in 13 patients (52%; 31.3-72.2%). Toxicity was mild with grade 2/3 leucopenia in 26%, stomatitis in 15%, nausea in 6%, diarrhea in 3%, and hand-foot syndrome in 2% of the treatment cycles. In 3 patients a catheter thrombus occurred and in 1 patient the treatment had to be stopped due to asthenia. The performance status improved in 39% of the patients and 65% benefitted in terms of a decrease in pain intensity or consumption of analgesics. CONCLUSION: This phase II trial confirms a significant antitumor activity and a beneficial clinical effect of gemcitabine plus CI fluorouracil in advanced pancreatic cancer. The combination is well tolerated and it will have to be shown whether oral fluoropyrimidines can increase the practicability of this treatment without impairing efficacy.     

Phase II study of gemcitabine and vindesine in patients with previously untreated non-resectable non-small-cell lung cancer

Because both vindesine and gemcitabine are active drugs in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with different modes of action and only partly overlapping toxicity, a phase II study was performed. Gemcitabine 1000 mg m(-2) was given on days 1, 8 and 15 every 4 weeks, while vindesine 3 mg m(-2) was administered weekly for 7 weeks, then every 2 weeks. A total of 42 patients with nonresectable NSCLC were included. The median age of patients was 56 years; 57% were men, 52% had adenocarcinoma, 31% squamous cell carcinoma and 17% had large-cell carcinoma. The performance status ranged from 0 to 2 with 83% in performance status 1. The majority (55%) had stage IV disease, while 40% had stage III B and 5% stage III A disease. WHO grade 3-4 leucopenia occurred in five patients (12%) and 9% had grade 4 neutropenia. Thrombocytopenia grade 3-4 was observed in six patients (15%). There were no septic death or bleeding episodes. One patient had a transient WHO grade 4 increase in bilirubin, and four patients had a decrease in glomerular filtration rate below the normal limit; one of these patients developed a non-reversible renal insufficiency. Ten patients (24%) complained of dyspnoea of uncertain mechanism, possibly involving bronchoconstriction. There were one complete and seven partial responses among 40 assessable patients (20%, 95% confidence limits 9-36%). Median response duration was 31 weeks (range 11-83 weeks) and median survival time 31 weeks (range 2-171 weeks). The current combination of gemcitabine and vindesine does not appear to be promising for further examination because of the toxicity and somewhat disappointing activity.     

A phase I/II study of combination chemotherapy with gemcitabine and 5-fluorouracil for advanced pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND: In an effort to improve efficacy of single-agent gemcitabine in pancreatic cancer, several studies have examined the effects of 5-FU combined with gemcitabine. However, no studies to date have been performed in Japanese patients. We thus conducted a phase I/II study of gemcitabine and infusional 5-FU in Japanese patients to determine a recommended dosage for this combination and clarify efficacy and toxicity. METHODS: Phase I evaluated the frequency of dose limiting toxicity of two 5-FU dosages (400 and 500 mg/m(2)/day) infused continuously over 5 days combined with gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) x 3 every 4 weeks. Results from phase I determined the recommended dosage to be examined in phase II for effect on survival period, clinical benefit response (CBR), tumor response and safety. RESULTS: A total of 34 chemo-naive patients were entered into the study. All had a Karnofsky performance of > or =50 points and distant metastases. Dose limiting toxicities in phase I determined the recommended 5-FU dosage at 400 mg/m(2)/day. Grade 3-4 hematological toxicities (neutropenia, leukopenia and thrombocytopenia) were the most common severe toxicities. For the 28 patients administered the recommended dosage, 1-year survival rate was 14.3%, median survival time 7.1 months and progression free survival 3.2 months. Seven patients achieved a 25% overall response rate and three showed 27.3% improvement in CBR. CONCLUSION: Although a meaningful survival benefit over single-agent gemcitabine was not demonstrated, 5-FU 400 mg/m(2)/day infused continuously over 5 days in combination with gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) x 3 every 4 weeks appeared to be a moderately effective palliative treatment with low toxicity in Japanese patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.     

A phase 1 study of vinblastine in combination with carboplatin for children with low-grade gliomas: a Children's Oncology Group phase 1 consortium study

Both carboplatin and vinblastine have demonstrated single-agent activity in children with low-grade gliomas. A phase 1 trial evaluating 2 different schedules of these 2 agents in combination was performed: (1) Schedule A = carboplatin (140 mg/m²) weekly × 3 + vinblastine (4.5 or 3.5 mg/m²) weekly × 6, every 6 weeks; (2) Schedule B = carboplatin (300, 400, or 500 mg/m²) on day 1 + vinblastine (4.0 mg/m²) weekly × 3, every 4 weeks. Twenty-six patients, median (range) age 4.4 (0.7–14.8) years, were enrolled. Four of 9 patients enrolled on Schedule A had recurrent grade 4 neutropenia, suggesting that this schedule was not feasible. Seventeen patients were enrolled on Schedule B. At the 500 mg/m² carboplatin dose level, 2 of 3 patients developed dose-limiting toxicity (elevated alkaline phosphatase, neutropenia). At the 400 mg/m² carboplatin dose level, none of the 6 patients had dose-limiting toxicity. Ten of 16 patients who received treatment on Schedule B completed the prescribed 12 courses. Of the 21 patients evaluable for response, central review confirmed 1 partial response and 6 minor responses. Eleven patients had stable disease (>3 months) and 3 developed progressive disease. Seven of 9 patients with visual pathway tumors and acute visual changes prior to enrollment had documented improvement. The recommended phase 2 dose and schedule is carboplatin, 400 mg/m²/dose on day 1, and vinblastine, 4 mg/m²/dose, weekly × 3, repeated every 4 weeks. Further study of this regimen in patients with low-grade glioma is warranted.