A phase I study of prolonged continuous infusion of low dose recombinant interleukin-2 in melanoma and renal cell cancer. Part I: Clinical aspects.

The optimal schedule for recombinant interleukin-2 (rIL-2) administration is unclear. Because the clinical and immunological effects of prolonged continuous exposure to rIL-2 are unknown, we have conducted a phase I study to assess the toxicity and feasibility of continuous low dose infusion of rIL-2 (EuroCetus) using central venous access with a portable infusion device on an out-patient basis. Twenty-two patients entered the study, 13 with melanoma and nine with renal cell cancer, age range 26-66 years (median 51), performance status less than or equal to 1. They were treated with one of the following doses per m2 per 24 h: 0.18 x 10(6) IU, 0.6 x 10(6) IU, 1.8 x 10(6) IU, 3 x 10(6) IU, 6 x 10(6) IU and 9 x 10(6) IU. Toxicity was evaluable in 20 patients receiving greater than or equal to 3 weeks treatment duration or in whom treatment was discontinued prematurely because of toxicity. Constitutional symptoms consisting of fatigue, malaise and fever up to 40 degrees C without significant organ dysfunction occurred with doses greater than or equal to 1.8 x 10(6) IU m-2. The maximum tolerated dose was 6 x 10(6) IU m-2 24 h-1. In all patients toxicity reached a peak at 3 weeks and resolved thereafter despite continued rIL-2 treatment. Peripheral blood eosinophilia (up to 66% of white blood cell count) followed the same pattern. An infection of the central venous access occurred in 55% of the patients but this was mostly asymptomatic. Thirteen patients were treated greater than or equal to 6 weeks and were evaluable for tumour response. A partial remission occurred in a patient with melanoma with a dose of 1.8 x 10(6) IU rIL-2 m-2 24 h-1.     

Subcutaneous administration of interleukin 2 and interferon-alpha-2b in advanced renal cell carcinoma: a confirmatory study.

Recent clinical studies have suggested that the combination of subcutaneous recombinant human interleukin 2 (rIL-2) and interferon alpha (rIFN-alpha) is especially promising in advanced renal cell carcinoma. We assessed the safety, activity and toxicity of home therapy with these two agents in 50 patients. Each treatment cycle consisted of a 2 day pulse phase, with 9 x 10(6) IU m-2 of rIL-2 being given subcutaneously every 12 h, followed by a 6 week maintenance phase during which rIL-2 1.8 x 10(6) IU m-2 was administered subcutaneously every 12 h on days 1-5 and rIFN-alpha 2b 5 x 10(6) IU m-2 once a day on days 1, 3 and 5. Objective responses (CR+PR) occurred in 9/50 (18%) patients, six of whom (12%) achieved a complete response. Disease stabilisation was observed in 17 cases (34%) and 18 patients progressed during therapy. In the other six cases, treatment was interrupted early for toxicity or patient refusal. One patient died of myocardial infarction during the second cycle. The overall median survival was 12 months. Home therapy with subcutaneous rIL-2 + rIFN-alpha 2b proved to be active, feasible and moderately toxic, but serious adverse events can sometimes occur.     

Phase I trial of high-dose bolus interleukin-2 and interferon alfa-2a in patients with metastatic malignancy.

PURPOSE: Based on preclinical evidence that the antitumor effects of the combination of interleukin-2 (IL-2) and interferon alfa (IFN alpha) are greater than those of either cytokine alone, we have performed a phase I trial of recombinant IL-2 (rIL-2) and recombinant human IFN alpha 2a (rHuIFN alpha 2a) in patients with refractory malignancies. This study was an extension of an earlier trial that identified reversible myelosuppression as the dose-limiting toxicity of this combination. The present trial used modified definitions of unacceptable toxicity to allow exploration of higher doses of rIL-2. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Both rHuIFN alpha 2a 10.0 x 10(6) U/m2 intramuscularly (IM) and rIL-2 were administered three times weekly for 4 consecutive weeks. IL-2 was given by intravenous (IV) bolus injection at doses that were escalated in successive cohorts of four to six patients, provided that toxicity at the preceding dose level was acceptable. Unacceptable toxicity was defined as an elevation of the serum creatinine level to greater than 5 mg/dL, an elevation of the serum bilirubin level to greater than 5 mg/dL, dyspnea at rest, hypotension refractory to pressors, altered mental status, or other toxicities of grade 3 to 4, using the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Toxicity Criteria. The doses of rIL-2 administered were 4.0 x 10(6), 6.0 x 10(6), 8.0 x 10(6), 10.0 x 10(6), 12.0 x 10(6), 14.0 x 10(6), 18.0 x 10(6), 22.0 x 10(6), and 26.0 x 10(6) BRMP (Hoffman-LaRoche) U/m2. At a dose of rIL-2 10.0 x 10(6) BRMP U/m2, patients were also treated with doses of rHuIFN alpha 2a of 1.0 x 10(6) and 0.1 x 10(6) U/m2. RESULTS: A total of 57 patients were treated. Intolerable side effects (hypotension, pulmonary, and CNS toxicity) were produced by rIL-2 26.0 x 10(6) BRMP U/m2 and rHuIFN alpha 2a 10.0 x 10(6) U/m2. Two of 21 patients with renal cell carcinoma showed objective responses, and five of 17 patients with malignant melanoma responded. Two of these responses in melanoma were complete and continue to be longlasting. CONCLUSIONS: When given with rHuIFN alpha 2a 10.0 x 10(6) U/m2 as described above, the maximum-tolerated dose of rIL-2 is 22.0 x 10(6) BRMP U/m2. This dose of rIL-2 is equivalent to 50 to 60 MIU/m2, depending on the conversion factor used. Based on this experience and other trials, we favor phase II trials in renal cell carcinoma using an alternative dose schedule of this cytokine combination, in which rIL-2 is administered by continuous infusion. We suggest that phase II trials of this combination in patients with melanoma use an rIL-2 dose of 8.0 x 10(6) BRMP U/m2 by IV bolus injection three times weekly in combination with rHuIFN alpha 2a 10.0 x 10(6) U/m2 IM three times weekly.     

Subcutaneous recombinant interleukin 2 in a dose escalating regimen in patients with metastatic renal cell adenocarcinoma

Recombinant human interleukin 2 (rIL-2) was administered by s.c. injection daily, 5 days/week to patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma in an escalating dose regimen. Fifteen patients were entered in this study and are evaluable for toxicity with one patient not evaluable for response because of lack of measurable disease. The patient population had a median age of 63 years with initial performance status (Southwest Oncology Group criteria) of 0 in one patient, 1 in eight patients, and 2 in six patients. The starting dose was 5 x 10(5) Cetus units/m2/day with dose escalation to 1 x 10(6), 2 x 10(6), 4 x 10(6), and 5 x 10(6) Cetus units/m2/day scheduled at 2-week intervals if no significant toxicity or response was noted. Six patients were treated with drug doses of 2 x 10(6) Cetus units/m2/day or higher with a maximum daily dose achieved of 2 x 10(6) units/m2 in two patients, 4 x 10(6) units/m2 in two patients, and 5 x 10(6) units/m2 in two patients. Fatigue with decrease in performance status and elevations in serum creatinine were the most common reasons for limiting the dose or removing a patient from the study. Only one minor anti-tumor response was seen. Subcutaneously administered rIL-2 was able to alter immunological parameters. In two of the three patients tested, development of lymphokine-activated killer cell activity in vivo was seen, and statistically significant enhancement of natural killer cell activity compared to values from a concurrently run normal control was demonstrated. With treatment, there was a trend toward increased numbers of circulating total lymphocytes, OKT 8+, OKT 11+, Leu 7+, and Leu 11a+ cells and decreased numbers of circulating OKT 3+ and OKT 4+ cells. However, for the heterogeneous group of six patients monitored, results were not statistically significant compared to pretreatment values. The levels of rIL-2-specific antibodies were followed in the sera of 10 patients. Six of the 10 developed rIL-2-specific IgG during treatment with five of the six patients also developing neutralizing activity. Recombinant human interleukin 2 given by the s.c. route in the doses and schedule used in this trial can safely be given as an outpatient regimen with manageable toxicity. It may result in enhanced immune function in some patients but also results in a high incidence of antibody formation.     

Long-term immunotherapy with low-dose interleukin-2 and interferon-alpha in the treatment of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to evaluate response, toxicity, and immunologic effects of an original immunotherapy schedule based on repeated cycles of low doses of recombinant interleukin-2 (rIL-2) and recombinant interferon-alpha (rIFNalpha) in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). METHODS: Fifty patients who underwent nephrectomy received therapeutic cycles consisting of subcutaneous rIL-2 for 5 days per week and intramuscular rIFNalpha twice weekly for 4 consecutive weeks. The cycle was regularly repeated indefinitely at 4-month intervals in all patients, irrespective of their response. rIL-2 (1 x 10(6) IU/m(2)) was administered every 12 hours on Days 1 and 2 and once per day on Days 3-5 of each week; rIFNalpha (1.8 x 10(6) IU/m(2)) was given on Days 3 and 5. Toxicity was graded according to the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. Forty percent of the patients had only one metastatic disease site at the time of treatment. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival, and an analysis of variance was used to evaluate the effects on leukocytes and lymphocyte subsets over time. RESULTS: A total of 241 cycles were administered. One patient achieved a complete response, and five patients achieved a partial response. Five patients had stable disease, and 30 patients had progressive disease. Nine patients were not evaluable for response. The overall response rate was 12% (95% confidence interval, 3-21%) on the basis of an intent-to-treat analysis. The 36-month survival probability for all 50 patients was 47%. Treatment-related toxicity was limited to WHO Grades 1 and 2. Both lymphocyte and eosinophil levels significantly increased after all cycles (by 42% and 353%, respectively). The treatment also induced significant increases in the CD25 positive (24%), CD56 positive (28%), and CD3 negative/CD56 positive (54%) lymphocyte subsets. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term, repeated treatment with low doses of rIL-2 and rIFNalpha is feasible in patients with mRCC. The schedule induces clinical response rates and survival probabilities are similar to those obtained using higher doses.     

A phase II study of combined intravenous and subcutaneous interleukin-2 in malignant pleural mesothelioma

A total of 29 previously untreated patients with histologically proven malignant pleural mesothelioma, with an ECOG score of < or = 2 and UICC stage I-II disease, were enrolled between May 1994 and October 1996. On days 1 and 2, 18 x 10(6) IU/day of rIL-2 was administered by continuous intravenous infusion, and 6 x 10(6) IU/day of rIL-2 by subcutaneous injection on days 5--20 inclusive of a 42-day cycle. Further treatment was administered if no radiological disease progression was demonstrated. A total of 29 patients were assessable for toxicity and 25 for response, and 49 cycles of IL-2 were administered with a median of one per patient (range, < 1-4). Toxicity included mild fever, nausea and vomiting, and skin rashes, < grade II. Three patients failed to complete one cycle of treatment because of toxicity and one died of disease before response evaluation. Two patients achieved a partial response (8%, 95% CI 1-26%) surviving 18.1 and 18.7 months from diagnosis. A total of 11 patients (44%, 95% CI 24-65%) with stable disease had a median survival of 13.6 months (range 6.5-33.8). The median survival was 8.6 months (range 3.7-34.5) for the 12 patients with progressive disease (48%, 95% CI 28-69%). This regimen of rIL-2 is well tolerated and shows limited activity in mesothelioma.     

A phase II trial of intravenous gemcitabine and 5-fluorouracil with subcutaneous interleukin-2 and interferon-alpha in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to determine the response rate and toxicity of gemcitabine and continuous-infusion 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in combination with subcutaneous interleukin-2 (IL2) and interferon-alpha (IFNA) in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. METHODS: Forty-one patients were treated with gemcitabine 600 mg/m2 on Days 1, 8, and 15 and continuous-infusion 5-FU on Days 1-21. The dose of 5-FU was 200 mg/m2 per day for the initial 8 patients but was reduced to 150 mg/m2 per day for all remaining patients due to toxicity. Starting on Day 15, IL2 and IFNA were administered for 4 weeks. IL2 was administered at a dose of 11 x 10(6) IU subcutaneously (s.c.) 4 days per week and IFNA was administered at a dose of 10.0 x 10(6) IU s.c. 2 days per week. RESULTS: Of 41 patients enrolled in the study, there was 1 complete response (CR), and there were 5 partial responses (PR), for an overall response rate of 14.6% (90% confidence interval [90%CI], 6.6-26.9%). The median time to disease progression was 6.6 months (90%CI, 3.9-7.5 months), and the median overall survival was 20.6 months (90%CI, 9.6-23.3 months). Toxicity was moderate to severe, with fatigue, fever, anorexia, or nausea experienced by 75-90% of patients. Mucositis and neutropenia, likely due to the gemcitabine and 5-FU, were experienced by a majority of patients. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of gemcitabine and 5-FU to subcutaneous IL2 and IFNA results in a similar response rate to what was observed in previous studies of IL2-based therapy. The toxicity of this four-drug combination is significant, and the regimen is not recommended for further development.     

IL-2 in combination with IFN- alpha and 5-FU versus tamoxifen in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: long-term results of a controlled randomized clinical trial.

We conducted a prospectively randomized clinical trial to compare the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous interferon-alpha2a, subcutaneous interleukin-2 and intravenous 5-fluorouracil as home therapy against oral tamoxifen in 78 patients with progressive metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Treatment courses consisted of interferon-alpha2a 5 x 10(6) IU m(-2), day 1 weeks 1 + 4; days 1, 3, 5 weeks 2 + 3; 10 x 10(6) IU m(-2), days 1, 3, 5 weeks 5-8; interleukin-2 10 x 10(6) IU m(-2), twice daily days 3-5 weeks 1 + 4; 5 x 10(6) IU m(-2), days 1, 3, 5 weeks 2 + 3; and 5-fluorouracil 1000 mg m(-2), day 1 weeks 5-8. The tamoxifen group received tamoxifen 80 mg twice daily over 8 weeks. Among 41 patients treated with interleukin-2, interferon-alpha2a and 5-fluorouracil there were 7 complete (17.1%) and 9 partial responders (21.9%), with an overall objective response rate of 39.1% (95% CI, 24.2-55.5). An additional 15 patients (36.6%) were stable throughout therapy. The overall survival was 24 months (range 5-76+). In 37 patients receiving tamoxifen no objective remissions occurred. 13 patients (35.1%) had stable disease and 24 patients (64.9%) showed continued disease progression. The overall survival was 13 months (range 3-73+). In summary, this home-based therapy regimen of interferon-alpha2a, interleukin-2 and 5-fluorouracil demonstrated significant therapeutic efficacy in patients with progressive renal cell carcinoma when compared to hormonal therapy.     

Phase I clinical trial of interleukin 2 and alpha-interferon: toxicity and immunologic effects

Because recombinant interleukin 2 (rIL-2) and recombinant alpha-interferon (rIFN-alpha) exhibit synergistic antitumor activity in C3HMT1820 T-cell lymphoma and B16 melanoma tumor systems, we have performed a Phase I study of this combination in 55 patients with advanced malignancies for whom no standard therapy exists. Successive groups of greater than or equal to 4 patients have been entered into 12 dose levels (1A-3D), with dose levels 1-3 referring to doses of rIL-2 of 0.1, 0.5, and 2.0 x 10(6) units/m2, respectively, and dose levels A-D referring to doses of recombinant human alpha 2a-interferon (rHuIFN-alpha 2a) of 0, 0.1, 1.0, and 10.0 x 10(6) units/m2. Both agents were given on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays, with rIL-2 being given as i.v. bolus injections and rHuIFN-alpha 2a being given intramuscularly. Myelosuppression was dose-limiting and was related primarily to the dose of rHuIFN-alpha 2a. The maximum-tolerated dose level was reached at a dose of rIL-2 of 2.0 x 10(6) units/m2 and of rHuIFN-alpha 2a of 10.0 x 10(6) units/m2 (dose level 3D). At this dose level, 3/6 patients developed grade 3 neutropenia (absolute granulocyte count less than 1 x 10(9)/liter). Myelosuppression was transient, with no documented infections being associated with neutropenia. Hypotension was mild; a single patient was treated with a vasopressor, but all other cases of hypotension responded to fluid administration. No significant pulmonary toxicity was produced. Fever, chills, and malaise were universal but not dose-limiting. Three partial responses and one minor response were observed in patients with malignant melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, and breast cancer. Immunological studies suggested that natural killer activity was related to both the dose of rIL-2 and the dose of rHuIFN-alpha 2a, with natural killer activity being positively related to the dose of rIL-2 and maximal at the lowest dose of rHuIFN-alpha 2a of 0.1 x 10(6) units/m2.     

A phase II study of the administration of recombinant interleukin 2 (rIL-2) plus lymphokine activated killer (LAK) cells in stage IV melanoma patients

From January 1987 to February 1988, 15 stage IV melanoma patients were treated with two courses of bolus injection of rIL-2 plus LAK cell infusions at the National Cancer Institute of Milan. The original treatment regimen included a first course of rIL-2 administration (400 micrograms/m2 bolus injection 3 times a day [TID] for 4 days) and a second course of rIL-2 administration (800 micrograms/m2 bolus injection TID for 7 days) separated by 4 consecutive daily leukaphereses. Autologous lymphokine activated killer (LAK) cells were reinfused into each patient on three occasions during the second period of rIL-2 administration. Due to the appearance of grade III-IV neurological, hepatic and cardiopulmonary toxicity, 7 patients discontinued dosing before the end of treatment, one patient desired to be withdrawn and one patient died from rapidly progressive disease, although complications of rIL-2 administration may have contributed to her death. Only 6 patients completed the schedule without evidence of major intolerance, even though the planned dose during the second course of rIL-2 was reduced to 400 micrograms/m2. The complete duration of treatment ranged from 11 to 19 days. The total dose of rIL-2 injected ranged from 12.6 to 30.4 mg. The number of infused LAK cells ranged from 15.5 x 10(9) to 60 x 10(9)/patient. Two of the 14 evaluable patients showed a minor anti-tumor response. In 5 patients new metastases in other sites were documented from 2 to 5 months after completion of dosing. No apparent association was found between progression of the disease (or the appearance of new metastases) and the total dose of rIL-2 injected, the number of LAK cells administered or the number of days of treatment. By December 1988, all patients had died of their disease in a period ranging from 3 to 14 months from the last injection of rIL-2. The lack of significant clinical responses in this study and the high toxicity of this treatment lead us to conclude that at least as far as melanoma patients are concerned, adoptive immunotherapy with rIL-2 plus LAK cells (as described here) is not a justifiable treatment option unless new evidence presents itself.     

Effectiveness of very low doses of immunotherapy in advanced renal cell cancer.

Twenty-one nephrectomized patients with metastatic renal cell cancer were treated with recombinant interleukin 2 (rlL-2) and interferon alpha (rIFN alpha). rIL-2 was administered s.c. at a dose of 1 x 10(6) IU m(-2) every 12 h on days 1 and 2, followed by 0.5 x 10(6) IU twice daily on days 3-5; rIFN alpha-2 was given i.m. as 1.8 x 10(6) IU m(-2) on days 3 and 5 of each week for 4 consecutive weeks. The cycle was regularly repeated at 4-month intervals and continued ad libitum in patients showing some response and in patients with progressing disease. Of 20 patients evaluable for treatment response, one (5%) had a complete response and three (15%) showed partial response. Three patients (15%) achieved stable disease and 13 (65%) were evaluated as having progressive disease. The estimated actuarial 44-month survival rate was 44%. Toxicity was limited to WHO grades 1 and 2 only.     

Multicenter, randomized, phase III trial of CD8(+) tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in combination with recombinant interleukin-2 in metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate in a multicenter randomized trial the antitumor activity of CD8(+) tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in combination with low-dose recombinant interleukin-2 (rIL-2), compared with rIL-2 alone, after radical nephrectomy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between December 1994 and March 1997, 178 patients with resectable primary tumors were enrolled at 29 centers in the United States and Europe. Patients underwent total nephrectomy, recovered, and were randomized to receive either CD8(+) TILs (5 x 10(7) to 3 x 10(10) cells intravenously, day 1) plus rIL-2 (one to four cycles: 5 x 10(6) IU/m(2) by continuous infusion daily for 4 days per week for 4 weeks) (TIL/rIL-2 group) or placebo cell infusion plus rIL-2 (identical regimen) (rIL-2 control group). Primary tumor specimens were cultured at a central cell-processing center in serum-free medium containing rIL-2 to generate TILs. RESULTS: Of 178 enrolled patients, 160 were randomized (TIL/rIL-2 group, n = 81; rIL-2 control group, n = 79). Twenty randomized patients received no treatment after nephrectomy because of surgical complications (four patients), operative mortality (two patients), or ineligibility for rIL-2 therapy (14 patients). Among 72 patients eligible for TIL/rIL-2 therapy, 33 (41%) received no TIL therapy because of an insufficient number of viable cells. Intent-to-treat analysis demonstrated objective response rates of 9.9% v 11.4% and 1-year survival rates of 55% v 47% in the TIL/rIL-2 and rIL-2 control groups, respectively. The study was terminated early for lack of efficacy as determined by the Data Safety Monitoring Board. CONCLUSION: Treatment with CD8(+) TILs did not improve response rate or survival in patients treated with low-dose rIL-2 after nephrectomy.     

A phase II trial of interleukin-2 and interferon alfa-2a in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma.

PURPOSE: A phase II trial that used a regimen of interleukin-2 (IL-2) and interferon alfa-2a (IFN-alpha) was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy of this combination in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-four assessable patients were treated with one to two induction cycles of IL-2 administered by continuous intravenous (IV) infusion at a dose of 3 x 10(6) U/m2/d [corrected] for 4 days per week plus IFN-alpha administered by subcutaneous injection at a dose of 5 x 10(6) U/m2/d [corrected] for 4 days per week for 3 consecutive weeks. A maintenance regimen of IL-2 2 x 10(6) U/m2/d [corrected] given by continuous IV infusion for 5 days per week plus IFN-alpha subcutaneously at a dose of 6 x 10(6) U/m2/d [corrected] that was given 3 days per week for 3 weeks was administered for one to five cycles. Twenty-eight patients (82%) completed one to two induction cycles, and 14 patients (41%) received maintenance doses. RESULTS: Major responses were achieved in four patients (12%), which included one complete response (CR) in a bone metastasis. Responses were observed in patients both with and without prior nephrectomy as well as in a primary tumor. Toxicity was moderately severe and included two treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSIONS: In view of the minimal antitumor activity and associated toxicity, the combination of IL-2 and IFN-alpha in this trial cannot be recommended. The investigation of new cytokines and the identification of biologic prognostic factors for a response to immunologic therapy are essential.     

Phase I trial of PEG-interferon and recombinant IL-2 in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma

PURPOSE: Pegylated interferon alpha-2b (PEG-Intron) is a conjugate of polyethylene glycol (PEG) and interferon alpha-2b, has a prolonged half-life, and an increased area under the curve (AUC) for interferon alpha-2b. The combination of PEG-Intron with recombinant interleukin-2 (rIL-2) was investigated in a phase 1 trial. To determine the maximal tolerable dose (MTD) and preliminary efficacy of concurrent subcutaneous (SC) administration of PEG-Intron and rIL-2 in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). METHODS: Cohorts of 3-6 patients received escalating doses of PEG-Intron (I-1.5, II- 1.5, III-3.0, IV-3.0, V-4.5 microg/kg SC) given weekly in combination with rIL-2 administered three times weekly (TIW) for 6 weeks. rIL-2 dose levels were escalated in weeks 1 and 4 (I-10.0, II-15.0, III-15.0, IV-20.0, V-20.0 MIU/m(2) SC), and 5.0 MIU/m(2) SC TIW was administered during weeks 2, 3, 5 and 6. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients (24 men; 10 women) were accrued at dose levels I (n = 4), II (n = 4), III (n = 6), IV (n = 14), and V (n = 6) between October 2000 and October 2002. All but one patient had prior nephrectomy (n = 33) and all but one patient (97%) had received no prior systemic therapy. Patients received a median of four cycles of treatment (range 1-9). Dose limiting toxicity occurred at dose level V and included grade 4 neutropenia and hypoxemia. A partial response was found in 5 pts (15%). Median progression-free and overall survival were 9.0 (95% C.I. 5.6-13.1 months) and 31.9 months (95% C.I. 17.2-61.9 months), respectively. CONCLUSION: The combination of PEG-Interferon and SC rIL-2 can be administered with acceptable toxicity.     

Local adoptive immunotherapy of human head and neck cancer xenografts in nude mice with lymphokine-activated killer cells and interleukin 2

The efficacy of local adoptive immunotherapy with human lymphokine-activated killer cells and recombinant interleukin 2 (rIL-2) in growth inhibition of established squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) was evaluated in a nude mouse model. The model of xenografted SCCHN was established by s.c. injections of in vitro maintained tumor cells (2-10 x 10(6) cells/mouse) into the flank of splenectomized animals pretreated with cyclophosphamide (200 mg/kg). The SCCHN line used was tumorigenic in 95% of the appropriately conditioned nude mice. Inhibition of tumor growth by locally administered effector cells was the end point of the study, since the tumors did not metastasize within 6 weeks of tumor challenge. Either i.p. or local administration of rIL-2 alone (1000 units/day) to the tumor site daily for 2 weeks resulted in a significant inhibition of tumor growth. In the absence of detectable natural killer activity in these mice, a modest dose of rIL-2 had a direct antitumor effect on SCCHN cells in vivo. In addition, complete inhibition of tumor growth was achieved with 3 times weekly injections of 5-10 x 10(6) lymphokine-activated killer cells delivered to the tumor site and 1000 units of rIL-2 administered locally every day for 2 weeks. Our data indicate that local or systemic immunotherapy with rIL-2 alone or local adoptive immunotherapy with an adequate dose of lymphokine-activated killer cells plus rIL-2 may be effective in preventing the growth of established SCCHN tumors in vivo.     

Evaluation of the safety of recombinant interleukin-2 (rIL-2) and rIL-2 plus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in the adjuvant treatment of gastric cancer patients.

Eight patients received either recombinant Interleukin-2 (rIL-2) alone or rIL-2 plus 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) by constant infusion after undergoing potentially curative surgery for gastric cancer. rIL-2, given at a dose of 18 x 10(6) IU/m2/24 hours, was safely tolerated and only two episodes of WHO grade 3 toxicities occurred, both of which promptly responded to treatment and temporary interruptions of rIL-2 infusions. 5-FU infusions given at 12.5 mg/kg/24 hours did not alter the rebound lymphocytosis seen after completion of rIL-2 infusions. We conclude that the administration of rIL-2 and rIL-2 plus 5-FU to cancer patients recovering from major surgery is safe and well tolerated.     

Modulation of O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase-mediated carmustine resistance using streptozotocin: a phase I trial.

1,3-Bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea (BCNU) resistance may be mediated by repair of chloroethylated guanine before stable cross-linking occurs. Guanine adducts may be repaired by the enzyme O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase (O6-AGAT). Such repair irreversibly inactivates O6-AGAT. Streptozotocin (STZ) forms adducts at the O6 position of guanine; repair of these adducts consumes O6-AGAT. In vivo STZ potentiates BCNU cytotoxicity. The purpose of this trial was to determine the maximum tolerated dose of BCNU that can be administered together with STZ. The STZ dose was 500 mg/m2/day for 4 days and was not escalated. BCNU was given 4 h after the third dose of STZ at a starting dose of 75 mg/m2. A total of 43 patients were entered in the study. There were 4 dose escalations, reaching a maximum tolerated BCNU dose of 175 mg/m2. At this dose, thrombocytopenia was the dose-limiting toxicity (one patient, 25-49 x 10(9)/liter; 2 patients, less than 25 x 10(9)/liter); neutropenia was less severe (2 patients, 2.0-3.9 x 10(9)/liter, 1 patient, 1.0-1.9 x 10(9)/liter). Two other commonly seen toxicities were elevations in the serum alkaline phosphatase and mild elevations in the serum creatinine. Peripheral blood lymphocyte O6-AGAT levels decreased from a mean of 212 fmol/mg protein pretherapy to 8.2 fmol/mg protein on day 3 prior to BCNU (P = 0.03). Three partial responses were seen. There were no therapy-related fatalities, and toxicity was easily managed. This study established that 150 mg of BCNU can be administered safely together with STZ, 500 mg/m2/day for 4 days. Additional studies are required to determine whether O6-AGAT-mediated BCNU resistance is suppressed.     

Bleomycin,vincristine, lomustine and dacarbazine (BOLD) in combination with recombinant interferon alpha-2b for metastatic uveal melanoma

This EORTC multicentre study analysed the efficacy and tolerability in patients with metastatic uveal melanoma of BOLD chemotherapy in combination with recombinant interferon alpha-2b. The dose of bleomycin was 15 mg on days 2 and 5, of vincristine 1 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 4, of lomustine 80 mg on day 1, and of dacarbazine (DTIC) 200 mg/m(2) on days 1-5, given every 4 weeks for a minimum of two cycles. Subcutaneous (s.c.) interferon alpha-2b at a dose of 3 x 10(6) IU was initiated on day 8 of the first cycle, and continued at a dose of 6 x 10(6) IU three times per week after 6 weeks. A median of two cycles were administered to 24 patients (median age 60.5 years). None achieved an objective response (0%; 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0-14), 2 (8.3%) remained stable, 20 showed progression, and 2 (8.3%) were invaluable. The median progression-free survival was 1.9 months (95% CI: 1.8-3.4) and overall survival 10.6 months (95% CI: 6.9-16.4). Overall survival improved with increasingly favourable pretreatment characteristics (median, 14.7 versus 6.9 versus 6.0 months for Helsinki University Central Hospital (HUCH) Working Formulation stages IVBa, IVBb and IVBc, respectively; P=0.018). Grade 3 alopecia and neurotoxicity occurred in 13% of the patients. This multicentre study did not confirm earlier reports that BOLD with human leucocyte or recombinant interferon would induce at least 15% objective responses in metastatic uveal melanoma.     

Flavone acetic acid (FAA) with recombinant interleukin-2 (rIL-2) in advanced malignant melanoma: I. Clinical and vascular studies.

A trial of FAA and rIL-2 has been performed both to study the clinical efficacy of this combination and to determine whether they cause haemorrhagic necrosis by acting upon tumour vasculature. FAA and rIL-2 were given to 23 patients with progressing metastatic melanoma. FAA 4.8 gm m-2 was given as a 1 h infusion without urine alkalinisation on days 1, 8 and 15. rIL-2 (6-18 x 10(6) IU/m2/day) was given as a continuous infusion days 8-12 and 15-19 (nine patients) or days 8-12 only (14 patients). Treatment was repeated after 2 weeks unless there was disease progression. Of the 21 assessable patients there have been one complete (skin and liver) and two partial responses (skin and liver, skin and nodes) lasting 20 + 17 + and 15 months, overall response rate 14%. Unexpectedly severe hypotension after the third FAA, when given 2-4 days after RIL-2, was the major toxicity (8/15 grade 3 or 4). No alteration in coagulation parameters were seen during therapy of the first ten patients. No increase in tumour necrosis was seen in any of the 15 biopsies taken from ten patients after therapy. This suggests that FAA does not have similar vascular effects in human as it does in murine tumours.     

Continuous intra-arterial administration of recombinant interleukin-2 in low-stage bladder cancer. A phase IB study

Toxicity and clinical effects of intra-arterial (IA) continuous infusion of recombinant interleukin-2 (rIL-2) were evaluated in twelve patients with low-stage transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the bladder (T1NOMO; G1 to G2). rIL-2 dosages were escalated from 18 x 10(3) to 18 x 10(6) IU/m2/d in four groups of three patients. After two 5-day courses, separated by a 48-hour interval, evaluation of clinical response and transurethral resection (TUR) were carried out. World Health Organization (WHO) Grade 3 toxicity occurred in 2 of 12 patients (hypotension/mental confusion and fever, respectively); all side effects rapidly disappeared after infusion was abandoned. No laboratory toxicity developed in any patient. Two pathologically proven complete responses (CR) were achieved using 18 x 10(4) IU/m2/d, and three partial responses (PR) were achieved using 18 x 10(5) IU/m2/d in two patients and 18 x 10(6) IU/m2/d in one patient, giving an overall response rate of 42%. All objective responses are still ongoing after a mean follow-up time of 23 months (range, 12 to 32 months). Local relapses occurred 3 months after TUR only in two nonresponders.