Rapid osteolysis of the femoral neck: consequence of an insufficiency fracture of the hip?

Purpose

To describe the imaging and clinical features of rapid osteolysis of the femoral neck in an attempt to better understand this uncommon pathology.

Materials and methods

We retrospectively reviewed the files of 11 patients (six women and five men) aged 53–78 years diagnosed with rapid osteolysis of the femoral neck. Available imaging studies included radiographs, CT, MRI, and bone scintigraphy. Histopathological evaluations were available for seven cases.

Results

All patients presented with complaints of hip pain, six of whom had acute symptoms, while the rest had progressive symptoms and impairment. All but one case were found to have bone deposition in adjacent hip muscles. CT confirmed bone deposition in adjacent tissues and true osteolysis of the femoral neck with relative sparing of the articular surfaces. Bone scintigraphy and MRI were useful to exclude underlying neoplastic disease.

Conclusions

Rapid osteolysis of the femoral neck tends to occur in patients with underlying comorbidities leading to bone fragility and may actually represent a peculiar form of spontaneous insufficiency fracture. Recognition of its imaging features and clinical risk factors may help distinguish this process from other more concerning disorders such as infection or neoplasm.     

Radiography of cervical spine injury in children: are flexion-extension radiographs useful for acute trauma?

OBJECTIVE: We assessed the role of cervical spine flexion-extension radiographs in the acute evaluation of pediatric trauma patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all pediatric trauma patients who underwent static cervical spine radiography followed by flexion-extension radiography during a 22-month period. We reviewed the mechanism of injury, physical examination findings, and patient age, and tabulated the results of initial and follow-up imaging studies. RESULTS: Two hundred forty seven children (age range, 1.6-18 years; mean age, 11.5 years) with a history of trauma underwent cervical spine radiography followed by flexion-extension radiography. Static cervical spine radiographs revealed normal findings in 224 patients (91%). Flexion-extension radiographs revealed normal findings for all patients with normal findings on cervical spine radiographs. Of 23 children (9%) with abnormal findings on static cervical spine radiographs, seven (30%) had congenital abnormalities visible on flexion-extension radiographs; 10 (43%) had traumatic injuries including fracture, subluxation, or soft-tissue swelling; two (9%) had instability; and six (26%) had questionable abnormalities that were noted on static cervical spine radiographs. In four patients (66%) with abnormal findings on static cervical spine radiographs, flexion-extension radiographs were helpful in ruling out abnormality. CONCLUSION: In children with a history of trauma and normal findings on static cervical spine radiographs, additional flexion-extension radiographs are of questionable use.     

Can an evidence-based guideline reduce unnecessary imaging of road trauma patients with cervical spine injury in the emergency department?

The aim of this study was to determine if an unvalidated imaging guideline can reduce the use of imaging in patients with cervical spine trauma. A non-randomized clinical trial using historical controls was conducted in the emergency department from October 2001 to September 2002. Following an education programme, which introduced the imaging guideline to clinicians, the use of guideline and imaging were measured. The guideline was also converted to decision-support software for use in the emergency department. Three hundred and fifty-three patients satisfied inclusion criteria during the study period and these were compared with 403 historical control subjects. No significant difference was found between the two groups for age, sex or fracture prevalence. A significant increase was observed during the study period in the proportion of patients who were managed without the use of any cervical spine imaging (21.25 vs 31.2%; P=0.03; 95% confidence interval, 3-13). There were no delayed diagnoses of cervical spine injury among those not imaged. It is feasible to disseminate and implement an evidence-based imaging guideline for patients with cervical spine trauma. The use of a computerized decision-support system can facilitate this and is associated with a safe reduction in the proportion of patients imaged.     

Imaging of cervical spine trauma: are the anteroposterior and odontoid radiographs needed when CT of the entire cervical spine is routine?

Objective: To evaluate the contribution of the anteroposterior (AP) and odontoid radiographs in cervical spine trauma when helical CT of the entire cervical spine is performed in routine screening. Methods: In part 1 of the study, 47 patients with cervical spine fracture (positive) and 92 patients without fracture (negative) were retrospectively assembled into a study population. For each patient, the lateral radiograph and the CT were evaluated for the presence or absence of fracture. The results were compared to the radiology report at the time of injury which was based on the lateral, AP, and odontoid radiographs plus the CT (gold standard). In part 2 of the study, the individual sensitivities of CT and each radiograph were determined by review of the 47 positive patients with the fracture locations known a priori. Results: In all 47 positive patients, the presence of fracture was correctly identified using only the lateral radiograph and the CT. In none of the 92 negative patients was the lateral radiograph plus CT incorrectly interpreted as positive for fracture. The sensitivities for fracture of CT, the lateral radiograph, the AP radiograph, and the odontoid radiograph were 100, 47, 28, and 18 % respectively. Conclusion: The AP and odontoid radiographs did not contribute to the evaluation of suspected cervical spine fracture when the lateral radiograph and helical CT of the entire cervical spine were performed in routine screening.     

MRI of the cervical spine with neck extension: is it useful?

Objectives

Standard MRI of the cervical spine is performed in a different anatomical position to that utilised for traditional contrast myelography. Those well practised in myelography are familiar with the considerable changes in configuration of the bony and soft tissues of the cervical spine that may occur with changes in the degree of neck flexion and extension. We set out to compare the findings in a select group of patients with myeloradiculopathy who had undergone myelography and MRI in both standard and neck-extended positions. These findings were correlated with the clinical status.

Methods

29 patients underwent myelography with CT (CTM) and MRI in neutral and neck-extended positions. The imaging was assessed for the degree of cord compression and neural foraminal narrowing, quantified using a simple grading scheme suitable for routine clinical practice. The degree of neck extension was assessed using an angular measurement.

Results

For both CTM and MRI, scanning with the neck extended significantly increases the severity of cord compression compared with the standard supine position, to a degree similar to that shown during conventional prone myelography. The degree of perceived cord compression is related to the degree of neck extension achieved. Correlation of standard MRI findings and the clinical level of radiculopathy is poor. This correlation improves when the neck is extended.

Conclusions

The most appropriate position for routine MRI of the cervical spine in degenerative disease remains unknown, but in selected patients imaging with the neck extended may provide important additional information.With the introduction of spinal surface coil technology and gradient echo sequences in the late 1980s, MRI rapidly replaced intrathecal contrast myelography as the standard imaging method for assessment of the cervical spinal cord and nerve roots. The two investigations are performed in very different anatomical positions. Standard cervical spine MRI is performed in a coil that is designed to make the patient comfortable, to minimise movement-related artefacts. This generally results in a position of mild extension of the neck. On the other hand, the majority of images for plain cervical myelography are obtained with the patient prone and the neck hyperextended so as to retain myelographic contrast within the cervical lordosis. CT myelography (CTM) is typically performed with the patient supine and with the neck straight or mildly flexed; however, CT myelography can also be performed in the prone position with the neck extended [1].For a number of years we continued to use plain myelography, with CTM as a second-line investigation in patients with cervical myelopathy and/or radiculopathy, when the results of standard MRI were inconsistent with symptoms and signs. More recently we have also performed MRI with neck extension, predominantly in patients with myelopathic features but inconclusive supine MRI. We have been unsure how extended MRI compares with myelography and whether it is able to produce the same degree of extension as myelography. We have performed CT in the prone extended position as well, but have also been unsure how that relates to standard supine CT imaging or to extended MRI. We therefore wished to compare these various modalities in a heterogeneous group of clinically problematic patients.     

Are cervical spine radiograph examinations useful in patients with low clinical suspicion of cervical spine fracture? An experience with 254 cases

Trauma patients with low clinical suspicion of cervical spine fracture are often examined with a plain X-ray cervical spine series rather than with cervical spine computed tomography (CT). The authors have been concerned by the absence of fractures in the group of patients examined with plain X-ray. The objective of this investigation was to determine the usefulness of plain X-ray examinations in suspected cases of cervical spine fracture compared to CT. A retrospective review was performed of all trauma patients undergoing imaging for suspected cervical spine fracture in our Emergency Department over a one-year period (January 1, 2007 to December 31, 2007). During the study period, 254 cervical spine plain X-ray and 3,080 cervical spine CT examinations were performed. Of the 254 plain X-ray examinations, 237 were interpreted as negative for fracture, 11 were suboptimal examinations, and six were interpreted as possible fractures (later ruled out by further imaging). Of the 3,080 CT examinations, 2,884 were interpreted as negative for fracture and 196 as positive. The overall positivity rates for acute cervical spine fracture were 0.0% in plain X-ray and 6.4% in CT examinations. These data confirm the authors’ concern that plain X-ray imaging for patients with low clinical suspicion for cervical spine trauma in our hospital may have too low a yield to justify its use. However, the 6.4% positivity rate in the group of patients selected for CT examination justifies its use in this group.     

Is there an association between fractures of the cervical spine and first- and second-rib fractures?

OBJECTIVE: To investigate a potential association between cervical spine injury and first- and second-rib fractures. METHODS: Retrospective review of the radiologic and medical records of 28 consecutive patients admitted to an acute spinal injury unit. RESULTS: A total of 10 (36%) of the patients with cervical spine trauma also had fractures of either the first or second ribs. Eight of these 10 patients had a fracture or fracture-subluxation of the seventh cervical vertebra or the C6/7 segment. CONCLUSION: Almost one-third of patients with traumatic cervical spine injury have an associated upper-rib fracture. The strongest association is between injury at the C7 level and first-rib fracture.     

Is a lateral view essential in management of hip fracture?

Introduction

Neck of femur accounts to about 86,000 cases per annum in UK. AP and lateral radiographs form an essential investigation in planning the management of these fractures. Recently it has been suggested that lateral view does not provide any additional information in majority of the cases.

Materials and methods

We looked retrospectively at 25 consecutive radiographs with intracapsular and extracapsular fracture neck of femur each presenting to our department between May 2010 and January 2011. These radiographs were put on the CD in 2 folders as AP and lateral. It was reviewed by 2 observers who suggested their preferred treatment. The results were compared for the intra observer agreement to assess the necessity of the lateral view of the radiographs. We also compared the treatment options with the gold standard.

Results

Our results showed that lateral view did not make any difference in the management in majority of the cases with excellent agreement based on kappa statistics.

Conclusion

We feel that the lateral view does not make any difference in most of the cases as shown by a good intraobserver agreement.     

Imaging suspected cervical spine injury: Plain radiography or computed tomography? Systematic review

Aim(1) to establish which modality offers the greatest accuracy in the detection of cervical spine injury (CSI) Following trauma: plain radiography or computed tomography (CT), and (2) make an evidence-based recommendation for the initial imaging modality of choice.MethodA systematic literature review was performed to identify primary research studies which compare the diagnostic accuracy of plain radiography and CT with the results of a reference standard in the detection of CSI. A search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Science Direct and Pubmed Central databases was conducted.ResultsTen studies were identified. Critical appraisal identified limitations among all studies. There was heterogeneity in the sensitivity estimates for plain radiography, whereas estimates for CT were consistently high. Examination of the reported sensitivities shows that CT outperforms plain radiography in the detection of CSI.ConclusionCT is superior to plain radiography in the detection of CSI. However, the optimal imaging strategy depends on the patients' relative risk of injury. If at high-risk cervical CT is indicated. If at low-risk the increased cost and radiation exposure mean that screening CT may not be warranted, good-quality plain radiographs are sufficient.     

Trabecular bone structure of the distal radius, the calcaneus, and the spine: which site predicts fracture status of the spine best?

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To compare trabecular bone structure measures obtained in magnetic resonance images of the distal radius and the calcaneus as well as computed tomographic images of the spine versus bone mineral density (BMD) of the spine and the calcaneus in the prediction of osteoporotic spine fracture status. MATERIAL AND METHODS: High-resolution magnetic resonance images of the calcaneus and the distal radius and thin-section computed tomographic images of thoracic and lumbar vertebrae were obtained from 74 cadavers. Structure analysis was performed using parameters analogous to standard histomorphometry. BMD of the spine was determined by using quantitative computed tomography and of the calcaneus by using dual x-ray absorptiometry. Spine radiographs of these cadavers were assessed concerning vertebral deformities. RESULTS: The diagnostic performance in differentiating fracture and nonfracture subjects was highest for structure parameters in the spine and slightly lower for these parameters in the distal radius and for BMD of the spine. CONCLUSION: In this study structure parameters in the spine were best suited to predict the osteoporotic fracture status of the spine.     

Unilateral hip osteoarthritis: can we predict the outcome of the other hip?

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to define, in unilateral hip osteoarthritis (OA), factors predicting the outcome of the other hip. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined the anteroposterior radiographs of the pelvis of 95 white patients with unilateral idiopathic (56 patients) or secondary to congenital hip diseases (39 patients) OA. The other hip was free from symptoms (pain or limping) at the initial examination and without radiographic evidence of OA; it was what we call a "normal" hip. Two parameters were evaluated: (1) the type of osteoarthritis of the involved hip and (2) the range of four radiographic indices of the contralateral hip: the sourcil inclination "(weight-bearing surface), the acetabular angle, the Wiberg's center-edge angle, and the neck-shaft angle. Follow-up radiographs for the hips that remained OA-free were available for 10 to 35 years and for those that developed OA, at the time of initial symptoms, range 2 to 31 years. RESULTS: Logistic regression analysis showed that the presence of idiopathic OA in one hip had a statistically significant effect on the development of OA on the other hip (p < 0.001). Minor deviations of radiographic indices of the contralateral hip is not a predictive factor for its outcome. When the radiographic indices are examined together with the pathology of the involved hip, only WBS was shown to have a significant effect to the development of OA and its type (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The following conclusions can be drawn from this study: 1. Patient with idiopathic OA of one hip is at increased risk of developing OA in the other hip. 2. The outcome of the other hip cannot be predicted only on the basis of the evaluation of its radiographic indices. 3. Among the different indices, WBS seems to have a strong influence toward the development of OA.     

Analysis of adjacent fracture after percutaneous vertebroplasty: does intradiscal cement leakage really increase the risk of adjacent vertebral fracture?

Objective  

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence and risk factors associated with adjacent vertebral fracture after percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) to treat osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. We also investigated the effect of intradiscal cement leakage on adjacent vertebral fracture formation after PVP.     

Skull fracture as a herald of intracranial abnormality in children with mild head injury: is there a role for skull radiographs?

The aim of the present study is to assess if skull fracture is a useful predictor of intracranial abnormality in children with minor head injury (MHI) and to evaluate the usefulness of skull radiographs. Retrospective review of CT scans and skull X-rays (SXR) of children <14 years of age with blunt head injury and correlation with the Glascow Coma Score definition of MHI (GCS > 12/15 or > 9/11) over a 1-year period was done. Three-hundred and eighty-one patients were included with a mean age of 6 years. Thirty-one percent of patients had intracranial abnormality. Forty-nine percent of all patients had fractures either on CT or SXR and 49% of these had intracranial abnormality on CT. Eighty-five percent of patients with drainable collections had associated fractures. Twenty-three percent of MHI had abnormalities on CT, of which 32% were drainable collections. All patients with MHI who had drainable collections showed a fracture. Some protocols for paediatric head injury recommend CT for all patients while others rely on clinical indicators. In developing countries, CT is neither widely available nor accessible, and preselection of patients is necessary. We demonstrated that omitting CT in MHI could result in missed intracranial abnormalities. All MHI with drainable collections had fractures. Fractures identified on SXR can be added to the clinical indications for CT in MHI and can improve detection of 'silent' drainable collections.     

Is there an added role for diffusion weighted imaging in the staging of cervical carcinoma?

Objective

To assess the diagnostic accuracy of diffusion weighted imaging (DWI-MRI) being a non-contrast based MR sequence versus dynamic contrast enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) in the preoperative loco-regional staging of the cervical carcinoma.

Imaging of the spine: Where do we stand?

The number of patients presenting with spine-related problems has globally increased, with an enormous growing demand for the use of medical imaging to address this problem. The last three decades witnessed great leaps for diagnostic imaging modalities, including those exploited for imaging the spine. These developments improved our diagnostic capabilities in different spinal pathologies, especially with multi-detector computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, via both hardware and software improvisations. Nowadays, imaging may depict subtle spinal instability caused by various osseous and ligamentous failures, and could elucidate dynamic instabilities. Consequently, recent diagnostic modalities can discern clinically relevant spinal canal stenosis. Likewise, improvement in diagnostic imaging capabilities revolutionized our understanding of spinal degenerative diseases via quantitative biomarkers rather than mere subjective perspectives. Furthermore, prognostication of spinal cord injury has become feasible, and this is expected to be translated into better effective patient tailoring to management plans with better clinical outcomes. Meanwhile, our confidence in diagnosing spinal infections and assessing the different spinal instrumentation has greatly improved over the past few last decades. Overall, revolutions in diagnostic imaging over the past few decades have upgraded spinal imaging from simple subjective and qualitative indices into a more sophisticated yet precise era of objective metrics via deploying quantitative imaging biomarkers.