Proximal coronary artery intervention: Stent thrombosis,restenosis and death

Background

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of lesions in the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) may confer a worse prognosis compared with the proximal right coronary artery (RCA) and left circumflex coronary artery (LCX).

Methods

From May 2005, to May 2011 we identified all PCIs for proximal, one-vessel coronary artery disease in the Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry (SCAAR). We evaluated restenosis, stent thrombosis (ST) and mortality in the LAD as compared to the RCA and LCX according to stent type, bare metal (BMS) or drug-eluting stents (DES).

Results

7840 single vessel proximal PCI procedures were identified. Mean follow-up time was 792 days. No differences in restenosis or ST were seen between the LAD and the RCA. The frequency of restenosis and ST was higher in the proximal LAD compared to the proximal LCX (restenosis: hazard ratio (HR) 2.28, confidence interval (CI) 1.56–3.34 p < 0.001; ST: HR 2.32, CI 1.11–4.85 p = 0.024). We found no difference in mortality related to coronary artery. In the proximal LAD, DES implantation was associated with a lower restenosis rate (HR 0.39, CI 0.27–0.55 p < 0.001) and mortality (HR 0.58, CI 0.41–0.82 p = 0.002) compared with BMS. In the proximal RCA and LCX, DES use was not associated with lower frequency of clinical restenosis or mortality.

Conclusions

Following proximal coronary artery intervention restenosis was more frequent in the LAD than in the LCX. Solely in the proximal LAD we found DES use to be associated with a lower risk of restenosis and death weighted against BMS.     

Intravascular ultrasound assessed incomplete stent apposition and stent fracture in stent thrombosis after bare metal versus drug-eluting stent treatment the Nordic Intravascular Ultrasound Study (NIVUS)

Background

This prospective multicenter registry used intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) in patients with definite stent thrombosis (ST) to compare rates of incomplete stent apposition (ISA), stent fracture and stent expansion in patients treated with drug-eluting (DES) versus bare metal (BMS) stents. ST is a rare, but potential life threatening event after coronary stent implantation. The etiology seems to be multifactorial.

Methods

124 patients with definite ST were assessed by IVUS during the acute ST event. The study was conducted in 15 high-volume percutaneous coronary intervention -centers in the Nordic–Baltic countries.

Results

In early or late ST there were no differences in ISA between DES and BMS. In very late ST, ISA was a more frequent finding in DES than in BMS (52% vs.16%; p = 0.005) and the maximum ISA area was larger in DES compared to BMS (1.1 ± 2.3 mm² vs. 0.1 ± 0.5 mm²; p = 0.004). Further, ISA was more prevalent in sirolimus-eluting than in paclitaxel-eluting stents (58% vs. 37%; p = 0.02). Stent fractures were found both in DES (16%) and BMS (24%); p = 0.28, and not related to time of stent thrombosis occurrence. For stents with nominal diameters ≥ 2.75 mm, 38% of the DES and 22% of the BMS had a minimum stent area of less than 5 mm²; p = 0.14.

Conclusions

Very late stent thrombosis was more prevalent and associated with more extensive ISA in DES than in BMS treated patients. Stent fracture was a common finding in ST after DES and BMS implantation.     

Safety and Effectiveness of Drug-Eluting Versus Bare-Metal Stents in Saphenous Vein Bypass Graft Percutaneous Coronary Interventions : Insights From the Veterans Affairs CART Program

Background

Stenosis of saphenous vein grafts (SVGs) after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is common and often requires percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) for treatment. However, data for the effectiveness of drug-eluting stents (DES) versus bare-metal stents (BMS) in SVG-PCI are unclear.

Objectives

This study sought to examine the association between DES versus BMS used during SVG PCI and clinical outcomes in the national Veterans Affairs integrated healthcare system.

Methods

We studied a national cohort of 2,471 post-CABG veterans undergoing SVG-PCI between 2008 and 2011 at all Veterans Affairs hospitals and compared clinical outcomes of between those receiving DES and BMS. Clinical outcomes included procedural complications, myocardial infarction (MI), and all-cause mortality. Comparisons were made in a propensity-matched cohort using Cox proportional hazards regression models.

Results

DES were used in 1,549 SVG-PCI patients (63%) and the use of DES increased progressively with each calendar year (50% in 2008 to 69% in 2011). Incidence of procedural complications was low and comparable in both groups (2.8% among BMS vs. 2.3% among DES patients; p = 0.54). During long-term (>2 years) follow-up, use of DES was associated with lower mortality than BMS (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.57 to 0.89) and similar rates of MI (HR: 0.94; 95% CI: 0.71 to 1.24) in the propensity-matched cohort.

Conclusions

In a national cohort of veterans, we observed widespread and increasing use of DES during SVG-PCI. In long-term follow-up, compared with BMS, DES use was safe and effective in SVG-PCI patients.     

Long-term Outcomes of Drug-eluting versus Bare-metal stent for ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction

Background

Long-term outcomes of drug-eluting stents (DES) versus bare-metal stents (BMS) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) remain uncertain.

Objective

To investigate long-term outcomes of drug-eluting stents (DES) versus bare-metal stents (BMS) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).

Methods

We performed search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane library, and ISI Web of Science (until February 2013) for randomized trials comparing more than 12-month efficacy or safety of DES with BMS in patients with STEMI. Pooled estimate was presented with risk ratio (RR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) using random-effects model.

Results

Ten trials with 7,592 participants with STEMI were included. The overall results showed that there was no significant difference in the incidence of all-cause death and definite/probable stent thrombosis between DES and BMS at long-term follow-up. Patients receiving DES implantation appeared to have a lower 1-year incidence of recurrent myocardial infarction than those receiving BMS (RR = 0.75, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.00, p= 0.05). Moreover, the risk of target vessel revascularization (TVR) after receiving DES was consistently lowered during long-term observation (all p< 0.01). In subgroup analysis, the use of everolimus-eluting stents (EES) was associated with reduced risk of stent thrombosis in STEMI patients (RR = 0.37, p=0.02).

Conclusions

DES did not increase the risk of stent thrombosis in patients with STEMI compared with BMS. Moreover, the use of DES did lower long-term risk of repeat revascularization and might decrease the occurrence of reinfarction.     

Five-Year Outcomes in Patients With Chronic Total Coronary Occlusion Treated With Drug-Eluting vs Bare-Metal Stents: A Case-Control Study

Background

Limited data exist on long-term safety and effectiveness of drug-eluting stents (DESs) in true chronic total coronary occlusion (CTO) settings. We evaluated 5-year clinical outcomes of patients with CTO treated successfully with DES vs bare-metal stent (BMS).

Methods

We compared the 5-year clinical outcomes of 156 patients treated with DES implantation with outcomes of a historical cohort of 159 patients treated with BMS. Primary end point was freedom from major adverse cardiac events (MACEs; defined as death, myocardial infarction [MI], and target lesion revascularization [TLR]); secondary end points were freedom from target vessel failure (TVF; combination of target vessel revascularization, MI, and cardiac death) and TLR at 5 years.

Results

After 5 years, the DES group had significantly superior event-free survival from MACE (84% vs 69%; log rank P < 0.001), TVF (71% vs 84%; P = 0.002), and TLR (77% vs 92%; P = 0.0001), compared with the BMS group. The Cox proportional hazards model identified BMS vs DES (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 3.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.85-6.17; P = 0.001), final minimal lumen diameter (HR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.14-0.52; P = 0.0001), and stent length (HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 1.00-1.03; P = 0.03) as independent predictors of MACE at 5-year follow-up. Twelve (7%) and 7 (4%) stent thromboses occurred in the DES and BMS groups (P = 0.23), respectively.

Conclusions

After 5 years, DESs were superior to BMSs in reducing MACE, TVF, and TLR in patients with CTO and should be the preferred strategy.     

Gender-related differences of diabetic patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents: A real-life multicenter experience

Background

Gender-based differences in diabetic patients are understudied in the field of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents.

Methods

Data were obtained from a multicenter registry of 2420 consecutive patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) who underwent PCI with paclitaxel- or sirolimus-eluting stents between 2003 and 2009. Among them, 679 (28.1%) women were compared to 1741 (71.9%) men in terms of clinical aspects and major adverse cardiac events (MACE), including all-cause death, myocardial infarction (MI) and target lesion revascularization (TLR). Target vessel revascularization (TVR) and any revascularization were also reported.

Results

Women were less numerous, older, used more insulin and showed more tortuous coronary arteries, while men were more frequently smokers and received larger stents. At the median follow-up of 24.3 months (interquartile range 12.3–39.7), MACE, TVR and any revascularization did not significantly differ between females and males (19.9% vs 18.7%, 12.2% vs 13.4%, 14.1% vs 15.1%, respectively). At multivariable analysis of the overall cohort, female gender was not a predictor of MACE (hazard ratio [HR] 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.92–2.36, p = 0.11), death (HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.84–1.24, p = 0.86), MI (HR 1.48, 95% CI 0.92–2.36, p = 0.11), and TLR (HR 1.14, 95% CI 0.85–1.52, p = 0.38).

Conclusion

In this registry of diabetic patients treated by drug-eluting stents, women were less represented, older and needed more insulin compared to men who, on the other hand, received larger stents. Gender-related outcomes were similar and female sex did not predict MACE.     

Impact of increased transmitral gradients after undersized annuloplasty for chronic ischemic mitral regurgitation

Introduction

It is unknown whether drug-eluting stents (DES), in comparison with bare-metal stents (BMS), improve clinical outcomes of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients with renal insufficiency. We aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of BMS versus DES, as well as sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) versus paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES), in STEMI patients with renal insufficiency.

Methods

From the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry, 874 STEMI patients with renal insufficiency (glomerular filtration rate < 60 ml/min) comprising 116 patients with BMS and 758 patients with DES (430 SES and 328 PES) implantation were selected. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) within 1 year, defined as composite of all-cause mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction and target lesion revascularization were compared. In addition to multivariate adjusted analysis, propensity analysis for stent choice was performed.

Results

With a median follow-up of 342 days, 116 MACE occurred. MACE was more frequent in the BMS group than in the DES group before (HR [95% CI] = 2.3 [1.3-3.8]) and after propensity score matching (HR [95% CI] = 2.0 [1.0-3.8]). The difference of MACE was mainly driven by a higher rate of target lesion revascularization rate in the BMS group. In comparison between SES and PES, there was no significant difference between the 2 groups in propensity score-matched populations (HR [95% CI] = 0.7 [0.4-1.1]).

Conclusions

In STEMI patients with renal insufficiency, DES implantation exhibits a favorable 1 year clinical outcomes than BMS implantation, however, no difference was found between SES and PES.     

Safety and efficacy of degradable vs. permanent polymer drug-eluting stents: A meta-analysis of 18,395 patients from randomized trials

Background

Degradable polymer drug-eluting stents (DP-DES) represent a promising strategy to improve the delayed healing and hypersensitive reaction in the vessel. However, the efficacy and safety of DP-DES vs. permanent polymer drug-eluting stents (PP-DES) are less well defined. The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the total, short (< 30 days), mid (30 days–1 year) and long (> 1 year) term outcomes of DP-DES vs. PP-DES.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched for randomized clinical trials to compare any of approved DP- and PP-DES. Efficacy endpoints were target-lesion revascularization (TLR) and in-stent late loss (ISLL). Safety endpoints were death, myocardial infarction (MI), and composite of definite and probable stent thrombosis (ST).

Results

The meta-analysis included 19 RCTs (n = 18,395) with interesting results. As compared with DES, there was a significantly reduced very late ST (OR [95% CI] = 0.42 [0.24–0.77], p = 0.852) and ISLL (OR [95% CI] = − 0.07 [− 0.12–0.02], p = 0.000) in DP-DES patients. However, there were no differences between DP-DES and PP-DES for other safety and efficiency outcomes, except that the stratified analysis showed a significant decreased TLR with DP-DES as compared to paclitaxel-eluting stent (OR [95% CI] = 0.41 [0.20–0.81], p = 0.457).

Conclusions

DP-DES are more effective in reducing very late ST and ISLL, as well as comparable to PP-DES with regard to death, TLR and MI. Further large RCTs with long-term follow-up are warranted to better define the relative merits of DP-DES.     

High post-clopidogrel platelet reactivity assessed by a point-of-care assay predicts long-term clinical outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction who underwent primary coronary stenting

Background

Recent studies have shown that post-clopidogrel high platelet reactivity (HPR), assessed by a point-of-care assay, is associated with a higher risk of adverse events after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We assessed the clinical impact of HPR by the VerifyNow P2Y12 point-of-care assay in 181 patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) who underwent primary PCI with drug-eluting stents (DES) at 3 hospitals.

Methods

The primary endpoint of the study was the 12-month major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), which comprised cardiovascular death, nonfatal MI and ischemic stroke. All patients received a single loading dose of 600 mg clopidogrel and 300 mg aspirin followed by a daily maintenance dose of 75 mg clopidogrel and 100 mg aspirin.

Results

A P2Y12 reaction unit (PRU) ≥ 282 (AUC 0.719, 95% CI 0.588–0.851, p = 0.004, sensitivity 68.8%, specificity 73.8%) was the optimal cut-off value in predicting 12-month MACE by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Occurrence of MACE was significantly more frequent in patients with HPR (PRU ≥ 282) compared to patients without HPR (20.4% vs. 3.9%, HR 6.24, 95% CI 2.05–18.99, p = 0.001). By multivariate analysis, HPR (HR 3.84, 95% CI 1.17–12.58, p = 0.026) and elderly patients above 80 years of age (HR: 8.13, 95% CI 1.79–37.03, p = 0.007) were found to be the significant predictors of 12-month MACE. The MACE-free survival rate was significantly lower in patients with HPR compared to patients without HPR (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

HPR assessed by a point-of-care assay was able to predict 12-month MACE in patients with STEMI who underwent primary PCI with DES.     

Clinical outcomes of patients treated with Nobori biolimus-eluting stent: Meta-analysis of randomized trials

Backgrounds

The Nobori is a new-generation, biodegradable-polymer coated, biolimus-eluting stent (BES) that has recently been investigated in several randomized trials with inconsistent results. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of Nobori BES versus other drug-eluting stents (DES) in patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Methods

We undertook a meta-analysis of randomized trials investigating Nobori BES versus other DES. Primary efficacy and safety outcomes were target lesion revascularization (TLR) and definite/probable stent thrombosis (ST), respectively. Secondary outcomes were the composite of cardiac death/myocardial infarction (MI)/target vessel revascularization (TVR), MI and death.

Results

A total of 9114 PCI-patients randomly received Nobori BES (n = 5080) or other DES (n = 4034). This latter group comprised patients receiving everolimus- (n = 2533), sirolimus- (n = 1376) or paclitaxel-eluting stents (n = 125). Median follow-up was 11 months [interquartile range 9–12]. The Nobori BES versus other DES showed comparable risk of TLR (odds ratio [95% confidence interval] = 0.91 [0.57–1.46], p = 0.71). There was significant heterogeneity across trials due to significant lower TLR risk with Nobori BES versus paclitaxel-eluting stent (0.32 [0.10–0.98], p = 0.046; p for interaction = 0.009). Nobori BES versus other DES showed comparable risk of definite/probable ST (1.40 [0.66–2.97], p = 0.39), cardiac death/MI/TVR (1.05 [0.88–1.25], p = 0.59), MI (1.13 [0.87–1.48], p = 0.37) and death (1.09 [0.81–1.48], p = 0.56).

Conclusions

Nobori BES has comparable efficacy with other limus-eluting stents at 1-year follow-up. There is no difference in terms of safety profile between these stent platforms.     

Fasting Levels of High-Sensitivity Growth Hormone Predict Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality : The Malmö Diet and Cancer Study

Background

Both pathological excess and deficiency of growth hormone (GH) are associated with cardiovascular mortality.

Objectives

The goal of this study was to test whether fasting levels of growth hormone measured with a high-sensitivity assay (hs-GH) predict cardiovascular morbidity and mortality at the population level.

Methods

We studied 4,323 participants (age 46 to 68 years; mean age 58 years; 59% women) of the Swedish, population-based Malmö Diet and Cancer study examined in 1991 to 1994. Using multivariate-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models, we related baseline levels of fasting hs-GH to incidence of coronary artery disease, stroke, congestive heart failure, all-cause mortality, and cardiovascular mortality.

Results

During a median follow-up of 16.2 years, hs-GH (hazard ratio [HR]/SD increment of natural logarithm of fasting hs-GH) was independently associated with increased risk of coronary artery disease (397 events; HR: 1.11; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01 to 1.23; p = 0.04), stroke (251 events; HR: 1.18; 95% CI: 1.04 to 1.34; p = 0.01), congestive heart failure (107 events; HR: 1.25; 95% CI: 1.03 to 1.52; p = 0.02), all-cause mortality (645 events; HR: 1.17; 95% CI: 1.08 to 1.26; p < 0.001) and cardiovascular mortality (186 events; HR: 1.43; 95% CI: 1.24 to 1.66; p < 0.001). The addition of hs-GH to a model with conventional cardiovascular risk factors significantly reclassified risk, with a category-free net reclassification improvement (>0) of 0.542 (95% CI: 0.205 to 0.840) in cardiovascular mortality.

Conclusions

Higher values of hs-GH were associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.     

Efficacy and safety of zotarolimus-eluting stents compared with sirolimus-eluting stents in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions — A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background

Whether ZES can further improve angiographic and clinical outcomes compared to SES still remains uncertain.

Objectives

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of zotarolimus-eluting stents (ZES) compared with sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI).

Methods

Major electronic information sources were explored for randomized controlled trials comparing ZES with SES among patients undergoing PCI during at least 9 months follow-up. The primary efficacy outcomes were target lesion revascularization (TLR), target vessel revascularization (TVR), and major adverse cardiac events (MACE); safety outcomes were stent thrombosis (ST), myocardial infarction (MI), and cardiac death.

Results

Seven comparative studies were identified (a total of 5983 patients). When compared with ZES at 12-month follow‐up, SES significantly reduced risk of MACE (relative risk [RR]: 0.74, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.61 to 0.89, p = 0.002), and TLR (RR:0.39; 95% CI: 0.29 to 0.52; p < 0.00001), without significant differences in terms of TVR (RR:0.68, 95% CI: 0.38 to 1.20; p = 0.18), ST (RR:0.71; 95% CI: 0.39 to 1.31; p = 0.28), cardiac death (RR:0.83; 95% CI: 0.49–1.42, p = 0.50) or MI (RR:1.08; 95%CI: 0.80 to 1.45; p = 0.62).

Conclusions

At 12-month follow-up, SES are superior to ZES in reducing the incidences of TLR and MACE in patients undergoing PCI, without significant differences in terms of TVR, ST, cardiac death, and MI.     

Randomized Comparison of Everolimus-Eluting Stents and Sirolimus-Eluting Stents in Patients With ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction: RACES-MI Trial

ObjectivesThe aim of the current study was to compare everolimus-eluting stents (EES) with sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) in patients undergoing primary angioplasty.BackgroundDrug-eluting stents may offer benefits in terms of repeat revascularization. However, as shown for first-generation drug-eluting stents, they may be counterbalanced by a potential higher risk of stent thrombosis, especially among patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). No data have been reported so far on the long-term benefits and safety of the new generation of drug-eluting stents in STEMI.MethodsConsecutive STEMI patients admitted within 12 h of symptom onset and undergoing primary angioplasty and stent implantation at a tertiary center with 24-h primary percutaneous coronary intervention capability were randomly assigned to SES or EES. The primary endpoint was a major adverse cardiac event at 3-year follow-up. The secondary endpoints were death, reinfarction, definite or probable stent thrombosis, and target vessel revascularization at 3-year follow-up. No patient was lost to follow-up.ResultsFrom April 2007 to May 2009, 500 patients with STEMI were randomized to EES (n = 250) or SES (n = 250). No difference was observed in terms of baseline demographic and clinical characteristics between the groups. No difference was observed between the groups in terms of number of implanted stents per patient or total stent length. However, a larger reference diameter was observed with SES (3.35 ± 0.51 mm vs. 3.25 ± 0.51 mm, p = 0.001), whereas patients randomized to EES more often received glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (54.4% vs. 42.4%, p = 0.006). Follow-up data were available in all patients (1,095 ± 159 days). No significant difference was observed between EES and SES in major adverse cardiac events (16% vs. 20.8%, adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 0.75 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.5 to 1.13], p = 0.17), cardiac death (4.4% vs. 5.6%, adjusted HR: 0.77 [95% CI: 0.35 to 1.71], p = 0.53), recurrent MI (6.4% vs. 10%, adjusted HR: 0.62 [95% CI: 0.33 to 1.16], p = 0.13), and target vessel revascularization (4.8% vs. 4.8%, adjusted HR: 1.00 [95% CI: 0.45 to 2.32], p = 0.99). However, EES was associated with a significant reduction in stent thrombosis (1.6% vs. 5.2%, adjusted HR: 0.3 [95% CI: 0.1 to 0.92], p = 0.035).ConclusionsThis study shows that among STEMI patients undergoing primary angioplasty, EES has similar efficacy as SES, but is associated with a significant reduction in stent thrombosis. (Randomized Comparison of Everolimus Eluting Stents and Sirolimus Eluting Stent in Patients With ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction [RACES-MI]; NCT01684982)     

Temporal trends in all-cause mortality of smokers versus non-smokers hospitalized with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

Background/objectives

Over the past decade, the development of novel management strategies has resulted in improved outcomes among patients hospitalized with ST-segment myocardial infarction (STEMI). The aim of the present study was to compare temporal trends in the mortality of smokers versus non-smokers admitted with STEMI in a real world setting between 2000 and 2010.

Methods

We evaluated time-dependent changes in the clinical characteristics, management strategies, and one year all-cause mortality of STEMI patients who were enrolled in the biannual Acute Coronary Syndrome Israeli Survey (ACSIS) between 2000 and 2010, categorized as smokers (n = 2399) and non-smokers (n = 3069). We divided the survey periods into early (2000–2004) and late (2006–2010). The primary endpoint of the study was the occurrence of one-year all-cause mortality.

Results

A total of 4564 STEMI patients were enrolled in the study. Compared with non-smokers, smokers were significantly younger and displayed a significantly lower rate of all-cause mortality at 30 days and 1-year. Both smokers and non-smokers who were enrolled in the late survey period received more evidence-based therapies (primary PCI and guideline-based medications) (p < 0.001 for all). There was a significant reduction in the risk of 1-year all-cause mortality only among non-smokers (HR = 0.664 CI 95% 0.52–0.85, p = 0.0009), whereas smokers who were enrolled in more recent survey periods did not display a significant risk reduction (HR = 1.08 CI 95% 0.77–1.51, p = 0.67).

Conclusion

Survival following STEMI among smokers has not improved over the past decade despite corresponding changes in management strategies. Future trials should focus on reducing the risk in smokers.     

Extent of Coronary and Myocardial Disease and Benefit From Surgical Revascularization in LV Dysfunction

Background

Patients with ischemic left ventricular dysfunction have higher operative risk with coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). However, those whose early risk is surpassed by subsequent survival benefit have not been identified.

Objectives

This study sought to examine the impact of anatomic variables associated with poor prognosis on the effect of CABG in ischemic cardiomyopathy.

Methods

All 1,212 patients in the STICH (Surgical Treatment of IsChemic Heart failure) surgical revascularization trial were included. Patients had coronary artery disease (CAD) and ejection fraction (EF) of ≤35% and were randomized to receive CABG plus medical therapy or optimal medical therapy (OMT) alone. This study focused on 3 prognostic factors: presence of 3-vessel CAD, EF below the median (27%), and end-systolic volume index (ESVI) above the median (79 ml/m²). Patients were categorized as having 0 to 1 or 2 to 3 of these factors.

Results

Patients with 2 to 3 prognostic factors (n = 636) had reduced mortality with CABG compared with those who received OMT (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.71; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.56 to 0.89; p = 0.004); CABG had no such effect in patients with 0 to 1 factor (HR: 1.08; 95% CI: 0.81 to 1.44; p = 0.591). There was a significant interaction between the number of factors and the effect of CABG on mortality (p = 0.022). Although 30-day risk with CABG was higher, a net beneficial effect of CABG relative to OMT was observed at >2 years in patients with 2 to 3 factors (HR: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.37 to 0.75; p<0.001) but not in those with 0 to 1 factor (HR: 0.88; 95% CI: 0.59 to 1.31; p = 0.535).

Conclusions

Patients with more advanced ischemic cardiomyopathy receive greater benefit from CABG. This supports the indication for surgical revascularization in patients with more extensive CAD and worse myocardial dysfunction and remodeling. (Comparison of Surgical and Medical Treatment for Congestive Heart Failure and Coronary Artery Disease [STICH]; NCT00023595)     

Long-term coronary arterial response to biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stents in comparison with durable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents and bare-metal stents: Five-year follow-up optical coherence tomography study

Objective

The long-term coronary arterial response of biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stents (BES) remains unclear. We sought to evaluate the coronary arterial response of biodegradable polymer BES at 5 years after stent implantation using optical coherence tomography (OCT) as compared with that of durable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) and bare-metal stents (BMS).

Methods

Five-year follow-up OCT was performed in 30 patients with 33 stents (10 with 12 BES; 10 with 11 SES; 10 with 10 BMS). Quantitative parameters and qualitative characteristics of the neointima were evaluated. A total of 5178 struts (BES, n = 2056; SES, n = 1410; BMS, n = 1712) were analyzed.

Results

Uncovered struts were found in 15 out of 2055 struts in the BES (weighted estimate 0.01%, 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 0.00–0.33%) and 54 out of 1410 struts in the SES (0.11%, 95% CI: 0.00–3.33%) (odds ratio [OR] 0.12, 95% CI: 0.01–1.95, p = 0.13). None of 1712 struts were uncovered in the BMS. Cross-sectional qualitative analysis of neointimal tissue showed that the frequency of lipid-laden neointima tended to be lower in the BES (2.26%, 95% CI: 0.38–12.3%) compared with the SES (9.90%, 95% CI: 4.37–20.9%; OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.03–1.16, p = 0.07), and was similar to the BMS (2.23%, 95% CI: 0.54–8.74%; OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.13–7.14, p = 0.98).

Conclusions

Biodegradable polymer BES shows a favorable coronary arterial response compared with SES, but different response with BMS at 5 years follow-up. The observed frequency of in-stent neoatherosclerosis within BES was similar to BMS and tended to be lower than SES.     

Prognostic implications of quantitative evaluation of baseline Q-wave width in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

Objectives

To evaluate quantitative relationships between baseline Q-wave width and 90-day outcomes in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).

Background

Baseline Q-waves are useful in predicting clinical outcomes after MI.

Methods

3589 STEMI patients were assessed from a multi-centre study.

Results

1156 patients of the overall cohort had pathologic Q-waves. The 90-day mortality and the composite of mortality, congestive heart failure (CHF), or cardiogenic shock (p < 0.001 for both outcomes) rose as Q-wave width increased. After adapting a threshold ≥ 40 ms for inferior and ≥ 20 ms for lateral/apical MI in all patients (n = 3065) with any measureable Q-wave we found hazard ratios (HR) for mortality (HR: 2.44, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.54–3.85), p < 0.001) and the composite (HR: 2.32, 95% CI (1.70–3.16), p < 0.001). This improved reclassification of patients experiencing the composite endpoint versus the conventional definition (net reclassification index (NRI): 0.23, 95% CI (0.09-0.36), p < 0.001) and universal MI definition (NRI: 0.15, 95% CI (0.02–0.29), p = 0.027).

Conclusions

The width of the baseline Q-wave in STEMI adds prognostic value in predicting 90-day clinical outcomes. A threshold of ≥ 40 ms in inferior and ≥ 20 ms for lateral/apical MI enhances prognostic insight beyond current criteria.     

Impact of intra-aortic balloon pump support initiated before versus after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with cardiogenic shock from acute myocardial infarction

Background

Little evidence is available on the optimal sequence of intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) support initiation and primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients who present with cardiogenic shock from ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The aim of this study was to evaluate the order of IABP insertion and primary PCI and its association with infarct size and mortality.

Methods

A series of 173 consecutive patients admitted with cardiogenic shock from STEMI and treated with primary PCI and IABP between 2000 and 2009 were included. The order of IABP insertion and primary PCI was left at the discretion of the interventional cardiologist.

Results

All baseline characteristics were similar in patients who first received IABP (n = 87) and patients who received IABP directly after PCI (n = 86). In these two groups, cumulative 30-day mortality was 44% and 37% respectively (p = 0.39). Median peak serum creatine kinase (CK) concentrations were 5692 U/l and 4034 U/l respectively (p = 0.048). In multivariable analysis, IABP insertion before PCI was independently associated with higher CK levels (p = 0.046). In patients who survived 30 days, IABP insertion before PCI was not associated with late mortality evaluated at five years of follow-up (HR1.5, 95% CI 0.7–3.3; p = 0.34).

Conclusions

Early IABP insertion before primary PCI might be associated with higher peak CK levels, indicating a larger infarct size. A possible explanation may be the increased reperfusion delay. Our study suggests that early reperfusion could have priority over routine early IABP insertion in STEMI patients with cardiogenic shock. Randomized studies are needed to determine the optimal timing of IABP insertion relative to primary PCI.     

Aspirin Treatment and Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention : Results of the ISAR-ASPI Registry

Background

Aspirin administration, as part of a dual antiplatelet treatment regimen, is essential for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Although the correlation between high on-clopidogrel treatment platelet reactivity (HCPR) and clinical outcome is well established, data for high on-aspirin treatment platelet reactivity (HAPR) are conflicting.

Objectives

The aim of the ISAR-ASPI (Intracoronary Stenting and Antithrombotic Regimen—ASpirin and Platelet Inhibition) registry was to assess the value of HAPR as a possible prognostic biomarker in PCI-treated patients with regard to clinical outcome.

Methods

From February 2007 to May 2013, we identified 7,090 consecutive PCI-treated patients with measured on-aspirin treatment platelet aggregation values directly before PCI. Platelet function was assessed with a Multiplate analyzer. The primary endpoint was death or stent thrombosis (ST) at 1 year.

Results

The upper quintile of patients (n = 1,414), according to Multiplate measurements, was defined as the HAPR cohort. Compared with non-HAPR patients (n = 5,676), HAPR patients showed a significantly higher risk of death or ST at 1 year (6.2% vs. 3.7%, respectively; odds ratio [OR]: 1.78; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.39 to 2.27; p < 0.0001). HAPR was found to be an independent predictor of the primary outcome (adjusted hazard ratio [HR_adj]: 1.46; 95% CI: 1.12 to 1.89; p = 0.005).

Conclusions

HAPR, measured at the time point of the PCI, is associated with a higher risk for death or ST during the first year after PCI. Present data are in support of the addition of HAPR to a panel of prognostic biomarkers in PCI-treated patients.     

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance-derived intramyocardial hemorrhage after STEMI: Influence on long-term prognosis,adverse left ventricular remodeling and relationship with microvascular obstruction

Background

T2 weighted cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) can detect intramyocardial hemorrhage (IMH) after ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The long-term prognostic value of IMH beyond a comprehensive CMR assessment with late enhancement (LE) imaging including microvascular obstruction (MVO) is unclear. The value of CMR-derived IMH for predicting major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and adverse cardiac remodeling after STEMI and its relationship with MVO was analyzed.

Methods

CMR including LE and T2 sequences was performed in 304 patients 1 week after STEMI. Adverse remodeling was defined as dilated left ventricular end-systolic volume indexes (dLVESV) at 6 months CMR.

Results

During a median follow-up of 140 weeks, 47 MACE (10 cardiac deaths, 16 myocardial infarctions, 21 heart failure episodes) occurred. Predictors of MACE were ejection fraction (HR .95 95% CI [.93–.97], p = .001, per %) and IMH (HR 1.17 95% CI [1.03–1.33], p = .01, per segment). The extent of MVO and IMH significantly correlated (r = .951, p < .0001). dLVESV was present in 40% of patients. CMR predictors of dLVESV were: LVESV (OR 1.11 95% CI [1.07–1.15], p < .0001, per ml/m²), infarct size (OR 1.05 95% CI [1.01–1.09], p = .02, per %) and IMH (OR 1.54 95% CI [1.15–2.07], p = .004, per segment). Addition of T2 information did not improve the LE and cine CMR-model for predicting MACE (.744 95% CI [.659–.829] vs. .734 95% CI [.650–.818], p = .6) or dLVESV (.914 95% CI [.875–.952] vs. .913 95% CI [.875–.952], p = .9).

Conclusions

IMH after STEMI predicts MACE and adverse remodeling. Nevertheless, with a strong interrelation with MVO, the addition of T2 imaging does not improve the predictive value of LE-CMR.