Formal consensus and consultation: a qualitative method for development of a guideline for dementia.

OBJECTIVES: To use a formal consensus method--the nominal group technique--for developing a clinical practice guideline to improve the diagnosis, needs assessment, and management of dementia at the primary/secondary care interface. To assess the usefulness of this method in an area where there is a dearth of clinical trials thus precluding an evidence-based approach. DESIGN: A qualitative and iterative method was used. The guideline was developed by an expert panel using the nominal group technique, incorporating the deliberations of a Primary Care Professionals' Task Group, recent reviews in the scientific literature, information from semistructured interviews with local specialists, and a local questionnaire survey. SETTING: Mainly Bristol but incorporating other parts of the United Kingdom especially the south and west. SUBJECTS: Expert panel group (including users and non-statutory organisations), local general practitioners (GPs), professionals carrying out the health check for people over 75, local geriatricians and psychogeriatricians, and primary care professionals with an interest in dementia. MAIN MEASURES: Items important in dementia from the nominal group in response to three questions on diagnosis, needs assessment, and management, ranked into a series of top 10 items for each area and allocated a score according to relative importance to each member; summary outputs from the questionnaire survey, semistructured interviews, and primary care professionals' task group. RESULTS: A clinical practice guideline covering diagnosis, needs assessment, and management of dementia in primary care was produced in the form of an algorithm and a management sheet. CONCLUSIONS: A formal consensus method can be used as an acceptable alternative to the evidence-based approach when developing guidelines in situations in which evidence is scarce, in which the guideline is intended as an aid in linking different stages of care, and in which practical and political considerations--such as the links between agencies--are important.     

Telephone triage by nurses in primary care: what is it for and what are the consequences likely to be?

OBJECTIVES: To examine the perceptions that those working in primary care have about the purpose and impact that telephone triage by nurses may have on their clinical roles and identities. METHODS: Twenty-six semi-structured interviews were carried out with general practitioners (GPs), practice nurses and practice managers from a purposive sample of nine practices in one health district in the North West of England. Analysis drew on the techniques of constant comparison and discourse analysis. RESULTS: Four themes emerged from the data: justifying triage - the respondents justify the introduction of telephone triage by emphasising the managerial benefits of controlling access and by suggesting the benefits this may bring to the patient-clinician relationship; categorising patients - patients are categorised and allocated on the basis of their biomedical diagnoses to the nurses or GPs in the practice; changing roles and identities - the hierarchy of patients and conditions created by allocating patients in this way strengthens and extends the professional hierarchy within a practice; and achieving a balance between conflicting aims - there is tension between the managerial need to triage patients according to their biomedical diagnosis and the aspirations that health care professionals have to personal and patient-centred care. CONCLUSION: Telephone triage by nurses may be effective at managing patient access to GPs but the need to categorise patients according to biomedical and managerial criteria needs to be balanced against the professional roles and identities that those working in general practice aspire to.     

Roles and identities in transition: boundaries of work and inter‐professional relationships at the interface between telehealth and primary care

Shifting the balance of care towards home and community is viewed as requiring interventions which enhance or complement primary care. Technology‐based interventions are seen as key to the future in this work. Telehealthcare implicates a new agenda for inter‐professional working across boundaries of healthcare. One such interface is between telehealthcare professionals and professionals located in primary care. This study reports the findings from a qualitative study forming part of a broader project examining the potential of developing and implementing telehealth interventions to support patients with long‐term conditions. Semi‐structured interviews were undertaken with telehealth nurse care managers, practice nurses and general practitioners in their respective work settings (39 interviews with 62 participants). Observation was undertaken at a telehealth call centre. The research took place between April 2010 and March 2011. Thematic analysis of qualitative data was undertaken. Telehealth nurse care managers' interviews suggested narrative constructions of new roles and identities to fit telehealth work, combining a holistic ideal and retro‐appeal with ‘traditional’ values of nursing, which distinguished and distanced them from counterparts in general practices. Practice nurses and general practitioners were ambivalent and often sceptical about the contribution of telehealth to long‐term condition work. Practice nurses' accounts suggested a sense of protectiveness about maintaining boundaries around established remits of managing long‐term conditions; general practitioners, having devolved much of the care of long‐term conditions to nurses, were keen to retain their positions as gatekeepers to resources. Perceptions of shifts of professional roles, new ways of working and how they are valued form a relevant contextual element to the introduction of telehealth interventions. A pre‐emptive view and response to how professionals understand and approach increasingly complex and multi‐faceted roles within primary care is likely to prepare and facilitate the introduction and integration of telehealth innovations into existing patient services.     

The consequences of task delegation for the process of care: Female patients seem to benefit more

ABSTRACT

The shift of tasks from primary care physicians to practice nurses and the continuing incease in the numbers of women involved in medical care may have consequences for the provision of health care and communication. The aim of the present study was to examine potential differences in female practice nurses’ application of communication skills, practice guidelines, and motivational interviewing skills during consultations with female and male patients. Nineteen female practice nurses and their patients (n = 181) agreed to have their consultations videotaped (during 2010–2011). The videotaped consultations were rated using two validated instruments: the Maas-Global (to assess generic communication skills and practice guidelines) and the Behaviour Change Counselling Index (to assess motivational interviewing skills). Multilevel linear and logistic regression analyses were performed. Female practice nurses provided significantly more comprehensive information during consultations with female patients (p = .03) and talked more about management with male patients (p = .04). Furthermore, nurses applied motivational interviewing skills more clearly during consultations with female than with male patients (p < .01). The shift in tasks from primary care physicians toward practice nurses may have implications for clinical and patient outcomes as patients will no longer be counseled by male professionals. Conceivably, female patients are motivated more by nurses to change their behavior, while male patients receive more concrete management information or advice.     

Meeting the educational needs of people at risk of diabetes-related amputation: a vignette study with patients and professionals

OBJECTIVE: To investigate how patients and professionals view the role of advice in diabetes foot care, in order to inform educational practice. DESIGN: A qualitative study based upon one-to-one interviews using a vignette technique with patients and professionals. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Interviews with 15 patients with diabetes-related foot complications attending diabetes foot clinics, and 15 health professionals across two hospital sites and two primary care trusts. RESULTS: There were similarities between issues raised by patients and professionals, with differences in emphasis. An important factor was patient understanding and acceptance of the implications of diabetes from diagnosis. Many patients reported a lack of early understanding that may reflect inadequate provision or acceptance of advice. Development of positive relationships with health professionals was important for patients and encouraged shared understanding. Use of the vignette technique highlighted the gap between patient knowledge and action, with patients and professionals emphasizing their own responsibilities in relation to reduction of risk through education and action. Responses suggest that early positive interactions with appropriately trained professionals are needed to help patients assimilate advice into everyday routines. CONCLUSIONS: For effective preventive care, patients need to understand how diabetes impacts on their health. Foot care education should begin early, be patient-centred and delivered with empathy by professionals whom the patients trust. The findings reflect patient and professional expectations in educational practice, and therefore have relevance for other chronic conditions for which much education and advice is related to self-care.     

Transforming general practice: the redistribution of medical work in primary care

The paper focuses on the redistribution of medical work within primary health care teams. It reports the results of the analysis of interviews with general practitioners, practice nurses and managers, undertaken as part of an ethnographic study of primary care organisation and practice during a period of rapid organisational change. By examining the ways in which the respondents account for how work is being redefined and redistributed, we explore how current government policy and professional discourses combine to reconfigure both the identities of those who work in primary care and the nature of patienthood. In particular, we show how general practitioners are being reconfigured as medical specialists or consultants in ways that seem to depart radically from earlier claims that general practice is a distinctive field of social or biographical medicine. Within this new discourse medical work is distributed between doctors, nurses and unqualified staff in ways which make explicit the reduction of general practice work to sets of biomedical problems or tasks. At the same time, the devolution of much general practice work to less qualified and cheaper personnel is justified by drawing on a discourse of person-centred medicine.     

'Justifiable depression': how primary care professionals and patients view late-life depression? A qualitative study

BACKGROUND: Depression is the commonest mental health problem in elderly people and continues to be underdiagnosed and undertreated. AIM: To explore the ways that primary care professionals and patients view the causes and management of late-life depression. DESIGN: A qualitative study using semistructured interviews. SETTING: One Primary Care Trust in North West England. PARTICIPANTS: Fifteen primary care practitioners comprising nine GPs, three practice nurses, two district nurses and one community nurse; twenty patients who were over the age of 60 and who were participating in a feasibility study of a new model of care for late-life depression [PRIDE Trial: PRimary care Intervention for Depression in the Elderly (a feasibility study in Central Manchester funded by the Department of Health)]. RESULTS: Primary care practitioners conceptualized late-life depression as a problem of their everyday work, rather than as an objective diagnostic category. They described depression as part of a spectrum including loneliness, lack of social network, reduction in function and viewed depression as 'understandable' and 'justifiable'. This view was shared by patients. Therapeutic nihilism, the feeling that nothing could be done for this group of patients, was a feature of all primary care professionals' interviews. Patients' views were characterized by passivity and limited expectations of treatment. Depression was not viewed as a legitimate illness to be taken to the GP. Primary care professionals recognized that managing late-life depression did fall within their remit, but identified limitations in their own skills and capabilities in this area, as well as a lack of other resources to which they could refer patients. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the complicated nature of the diagnosis and management of late-life depression. Protocols for the diagnosis and treatment of depression emphasis the biomedical model which does not fit with the everyday experience of GPs or elderly patients who share the views of primary care professionals that depression is a consequence of social and contextual issues. There is a need for the development of evidence-based provision for older people with depression within primary care, but also a need for elderly patients to be made aware of the legitimacy of presenting low mood and misery to their primary care professional.     

Communication about risk: the responses of primary care professionals to standardizing the 'language of risk' and communication tools

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to gauge responses of primary care professionals to standardization of the 'language of risk' and risk communication tools. METHODS: We carried out a qualitative study using six semi-structured focus group discussions. The subjects were 36 primary care professionals from general practice, practice nurse, district nurse, community psychiatric nurse and health visitor disciplines. RESULTS: Between professionals, the standardization of the language of risk was felt to have potential benefit in making professionals consistent in their appreciation of risks and communication with each other. Between professionals and patients, standardized language was thought inappropriate or insufficient because of contextual variation in communication and interpretation of risk information by patients. The use of more-detailed comparisons of risks was felt to be a potentially effective development of risk communication in practice. CONCLUSIONS: A standard language of risk communication was perceived as being potentially helpful for communication between professionals, but many respondents were sceptical about its usefulness in communication with patients.      

Clinical management of chlamydia in general practice: a survey of reported practice

BACKGROUND: Chlamydia trachomatis is the most common curable sexually transmitted infection (STI) in the UK. Prevalence of the infection in different health care settings has been found to be between 2% and 29% and diagnoses of the infection continue to rise significantly. It is estimated, however, that only 10% of all chlamydial infections are seen and treated in genitourinary medicine (GUM) clinics. Few data exist about the actual practice patterns of primary care providers in the management of chlamydia. The management of patients identified with the infection within this setting warrants attention. AIMS: To determine general practitioners' (GPs') and nurses' reported clinical practice in the management of genital chlamydial infection. To design a needs-based education guideline on the management of chlamydia in rural primary care. DESIGN: An anonymous, confidential, self-administered postal questionnaire was sent to all GPs and cervical cytology practice nurses in 84 practices in Dyfed Powys Health Authority (DPHA) area, Wales, UK. RESULTS: Following two mailings of the survey, responses were obtained from 75/84 practices (response rate 89%). A total of 130/307 GPs (response rate 42%) and 72/152 nurses (response rate 47%) in these practices responded. The data demonstrated that few tests for chlamydia are being carried out in general practice: 42% (55/130) of GPs and 54% (37/72) of nurses reported carrying out between one and four tests a month, and 35% (46/130) of GPs and 29% (21/72) of nurses reported performing less than one test a month. Very few positive results are being obtained. The majority of GPs (72%) and nurses (68%) routinely use the appropriate endocervical swab when testing for chlamydia, however 19% of GPs and 20% of nurses are using either an incorrect wooden-stemmed swab or are taking an inappropriate high vaginal swab. CONCLUSIONS: Few chlamydia tests are being performed in primary care in DPHA, Wales. Health professionals in general practice are in need of, and are in favour of, up-to-date training on all aspects of chlamydial identification and management in primary care. Attention needs to be focused upon resources and the paucity of GUM services and their access within the DPHA area.     

An evaluation of the implementation of a best practice guideline on tracheal suctioning in intensive care units

Aim To minimise suctioning-induced complications in intensive care patients, it is crucial that nurses are able to perform the procedure safely and act in accord with research-based recommendations. This paper reports the process of developing, disseminating and implementing the best practice guideline and an evaluation of the process and outcomes of care during and following its implementation in intensive care units. Methods The study was divided into four phases: (i) to develop the best practice guideline and plan strategies for its dissemination and implementation; (ii) to audit the current practice of nurses in the tracheal suctioning of patients in intensive care units with an artificial airway; (iii) to disseminate and implement the best practice guideline; and (iv) to evaluate the process as well as outcome of care following its implementation in intensive care units. Results The pretest results indicate that gaps exist between actual nursing practice and recommendations based on research evidence. Most nurses performed the skills in accord with the best practice guideline, with 65% nurses scoring above the 70% level. The post-test audit results show that, overall, nurses demonstrated a good endotracheal suctioning technique, with 96% scoring above 75%, indicating an overall improvement in compliance with the guideline. A statistically significant difference was found between the pretest (73%) and post-test (89%) compliance scores (t?=?-7.67, P?相似文献   

Translating policy into practice: a case study in the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease

Background This paper focuses on the relationships between health ‘policy’ as it is embodied in official documentation, and health ‘practice’ as reported and reflected on in the talk of policy‐makers, health professionals and patients. The specific context for the study involves a comparison of policies relating to the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease (CHD) in the two jurisdictions of Ireland – involving as they do a predominantly state funded (National Health Service) system in the north and a mixed health‐care economy in the south. The key question is to determine how the detail of health policy as contained in policy documents connects to and gets translated into practice and action. Methods The data sources for the study include relevant health‐care policy documents (N = 5) and progress reports (N = 6) in the two Irish jurisdictions, and semi‐structured interviews with a range of policy‐makers (N = 28), practice nurses (14), general practitioners (12) and patients (13) to explore their awareness of the documents’ contents and how they saw the impact of ‘policy’ on primary care practice. Results The findings suggest that although strategic policy documents can be useful for highlighting and channelling attention to health issues that require concerted action, they have little impact on what either professionals or lay people do. Conclusion To influence the latter and to encourage a systematic approach to the delivery of health care it seems likely that contractual arrangements – specifying tasks to be undertaken and methods for monitoring and reporting on activity – are required.     

新医改视域下北京市基层护士对失能失智老年照护的知信行现状与发展需求分析

目的 了解北京市基层护士对失能失智老年照护的知信行现状及发展需求,为改善基层医院失能失智老年照护策略及政府相关政策的提出提供实证依据.方法 采用自制《基层护士老年失能失智照护知信行及需求调查问卷》对北京市232名基层护士进行老年失能失智照护知识、行为、态度以及需求的调查.结果 北京市基层护士失能失智老年照护知信行总分为...     

Who is on the primary care team? Professionals’ perceptions of the conceptualization of teams and the underlying factors: a mixed-methods study

Background

Due to the growing prevalence of elderly patients with multi-morbidity living at home, there is an increasing need for primary care professionals from different disciplinary backgrounds to collaborate as primary care teams. However, it is unclear how primary care professionals conceptualize teams and what underlying factors influence their perception of being part of a team. Our research question is: What are primary care professionals’ perceptions of teams and team membership among primary care disciplines and what factors influence their perceptions?

Methods

We conducted a mixed-methods study in the Dutch primary care setting. First, a survey study of 152 professionals representing 12 primary care disciplines was conducted, focusing on their perceptions of which disciplines are part of the team and the degree of relational coordination between professionals from different disciplinary backgrounds. Subsequently, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 32 professionals representing 5 primary care disciplines to gain a deeper understanding of the underlying factors influencing their perceptions and the (mis)alignment between these perceptions.

Results

Misalignments were found between perceptions regarding which disciplines are members of the team and the relational coordination between disciplines. For example, general practitioners were viewed as part of the team by helping assistants, (district) nurses, occupational therapists and geriatric specialized practice nurses, whereas the general practitioners themselves only considered geriatric specialized practice nurses to be part of their team. Professionals perceive multidisciplinary primary care teams as having multiple inner and outer layers. Three factors influence their perception of being part of a team and acting accordingly: a) knowing the people you work with, b) the necessity for knowledge exchange and c) sharing a holistic view of caregiving.

Conclusion

Research and practice should take into account the misalignment between primary care professionals’ perceptions of primary care teams, as our study notes variations in the conceptualization of primary care teams. To enhance teamwork between professionals from different disciplinary backgrounds, professionals acknowledge the importance of three underlying conditions: team familiarity, regular and structured knowledge exchange between all professionals involved in the care process and realizing and believing in the added value for patients of working as a team.

     

New opportunities for nurses and other healthcare professionals? A review of the potential impact of the new GMS contract on the primary care workforce

PURPOSE: The paper seeks to show that the new General Medical Services (GMS) contract will provide opportunities for NHS staff to enhance their roles, so it is important that adequate training assessment and quality control systems are set in place. This paper assesses the implications for NHS staff in primary care. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: In this paper a review of policy documents was undertaken. FINDINGS: The paper finds that enhanced services set out in the new GMS contract may be provided by primary care organisations and healthcare professionals other than those located in general practitioner (GP) practices. As nurses and other healthcare professionals take on tasks previously conducted by GPs, so GPs will take on more consultant tasks previously confined to secondary care. Personal Medical Services (PMS) and GMS are converging in their contractual obligations and the opportunities offered to staff. As well as General Practitioners with Special Interests (GPwSIs), Practitioners with Special Interests (PwSIs) are important developments, which could promote recruitment and retention in the nursing and allied health professional workforce. Nurses and other healthcare professionals will be the main source of staffing for services shifted from secondary care. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: The paper shows that it will be important to identify whether these professionals can substitute for GPs, the boundaries to that substitution, and whether recruitment and retention are enhanced. Training for GPwSIs and PwSIs will be introduced or expanded but also needs accreditation and validation. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: The paper provides an overview of the implications of the new GMS contract for nurses and other NHS professionals.     

The changing role of the practice nurse

This study examines the changing role of practice nurses in the primary care of elderly people. The study took place in three district health authorities. Random samples of 1500 people aged 65 years and over were interviewed in 1990 and again in 1992 and questioned on their utilization and opinions of primary care services. More older people in 1992 than in 1990 were aware that their practice employed a nurse and annual consultation rates increased from 27% in 1990 to 43% in 1992 and those who consulted did so more often in 1992 than 1990. Their principal reasons for consulting a practice nurse included blood pressure checks, blood tests, ‘flu injections and ear syringing. There was an increase in the number of patients aged over 75 years who reported having a health assessment “health check” and an increase in the proportion of assessments carried out by the practice nurse. Respondents were very positive about their relationship with practice nurses; only one patient in each year was dissatisfied with practice nursing services and in 1992 there was an increase in the number of patients who reported being very satisfied. Conclusions: The role of practice nurses appears to be expanding and there is therefore an on-going need for evaluation and training to enable nurses better to fulfil their enhanced role in the primary care team.     

Poor communication may impair optimal asthma care: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND: Despite asthma being primarily managed in general practice and primary care, there is little research into the issues and tools which may impact on managing poorly controlled asthma in this setting. OBJECTIVE: To explore the views of health care professionals (HCPs) towards asthma guidelines and self-management plans (SMPs) to identify why these are not used routinely in general practice. METHODS: Data from 54 HCPs [GPs and practice nurses (PNs)] in north-east Scotland were collected via qualitative interviews and focus groups. Participant views and experience of asthma guidelines and SMPs were explored. RESULTS: Participants had mainly positive attitudes towards guidelines and SMPs, although both were used only when deemed suitable by the individual. Suitability depended on individual patient issues (e.g. psychosocial factors, level of control) and/or professional issues (e.g. ease of use, time available, job roles). Patient issues were viewed as impacting on asthma control directly and, indirectly, as the main reason for not using guidelines or SMPs with a patient. HCPs reported lacking necessary communication skills for dealing with patient asthma control issues, particularly where these were non-medical. Professional and organizational issues such as training and communication were also perceived as impairing asthma management. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that guidelines are seen as providing the 'why' of helping asthma patients' self-manage but not the 'what to...' or 'how to...' communicate. Poor professional-patient communication seems largely to explain the poor uptake of SMPs and guideline use in general practice and primary care. This limitation is more obvious to professionals when they are working with patients with poorly controlled asthma. There is a need to identify key communication skills for effective professional-patient partnership in adult asthma management, and to develop robust strategies for effectively training GPs and PNs in enhancing these skills.     

Communicating risk in dementia care: Survey of health and social care professionals

Supporting people to live at home in line with community care policies requires increasing attention to assessing, communicating and managing risks. There is a challenge in supporting client choices that include risk‐taking while demonstrating professional accountability. Risk communication becomes increasingly important with the need to engage clients and families in meaningful shared decision‐making. This presents particular challenges in dementia services. This survey of risk communication in dementia care was administered to all health and social care professionals in community dementia services in Northern Ireland: June–September 2016. Of 270 professionals, 70 questionnaires were fully completed, with 55 partial completions. Scores on the Berlin Numeracy Test plus Schwartz items was low‐moderate (mean 2.79 out of 7). This study did not find a significant association between numeracy and accurate perceptions of risk likelihoods in practice‐based scenarios. Although 86% reported using numeric information in practice (mostly from assessment tools), respondents rarely communicated themselves using numbers. As in other domains, participants’ responses were widely variable on numeric estimates of verbal terms for likelihood. In relation to medication side effects, few participants provided responses that were concordant with those in the guidance of the European Union. The risks most commonly encountered in practice were (in rank order): falls, depression, poor personal hygiene, medicines mismanagement, leaving home unsupervised, financial mismanagement, malnutrition, swallowing difficulties, abuse from others, risks to others, home appliance accidents and refusing equipment. Respondents generally overestimated the likelihood of serious harmful events by approximately 10‐fold (having a missing person's report filed with the police; having a fall resulting in hospitalisation) and by approximately double (being involved in a car accident; causing a home fire), and with wide variation between respondents. There is potential in icon arrays for communicating risks. Risk literacy among dementia care practitioners needs to be developed.     

"Opening a can of worms": GP and practice nurse barriers to talking about sexual health in primary care

BACKGROUND: There is evidence that health professionals do not discuss sexually related issues in consultations as often as patients would like. Although primary care has been identified as the preferred place to seek treatment for sexual health concerns, little is known either of the factors that prevent GPs and practice nurses initiating such discussions or of how they feel communication in this area could be improved. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present study was to identify barriers perceived by GPs and practice nurses to inhibit discussion of sexual health issues in primary care and explore strategies to improve communication in this area. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 22 GPs and 35 practice nurses recruited from diverse practices throughout Sheffield. RESULTS: The term 'can of worms' summarized participants' beliefs that sexually related issues are highly problematic within primary care because of their sensitivity, complexity and constraints of time and expertise. Particular barriers were identified to discussing sexual health with patients of the opposite gender, patients from Black and ethnic minority groups, middle-aged and older patients, and non-heterosexual patients. Potential strategies to improve communication about sexual health within primary care included training, providing patient information and expanding the role of the practice nurse; however, several limitations to these approaches were identified. CONCLUSION: GPs and practice nurses do not address sexual health issues proactively with patients, and this area warrants further attention if policy recommendations to expand the role of primary care within sexual health management are to be met.     

The role of clinical audit in the quality improvement of health care

The aim of clinical audit is continuous improvement of the quality of care through systematic and critical review of current practice against explicit criteria and the implementation of change if necessary. The audit is a regular multidisciplinary activity by which all participants of care including doctors, nurses and other health professionals carry out a systematic review of their own practice. Data collected during the process of audit should be handled with care, and individual data concerning care-givers, patients or health professionals must be treated confidentially. Clinical audit needs realistic timeframe and necessary resources as well as tolerant culture of learning organisations. Furthermore the success of clinical audit depends on the commitment and support of the management of the organisations. Clinical audit could relatively easily be embodied into the current practice of peer-review processes and other quality improvement initiatives in Hungary. Widespread and systemic application of clinical audit may improve the quality of patient care and maintain the trust of the population. However, clinical audit should be effective and cost-effective. The recently published methodological guideline by the Ministry intends to promote good practice in clinical audit.