益生菌制剂VSL#3对溃疡性结肠炎诱导缓解作用的系统评价

循证医学证据提示益生菌对溃疡性结肠炎（UC）的诱导缓解无效,但对维持缓解有效,然而2009年发表的两项临床试验结果显示益生菌合剂VSL#3对UC的诱导缓解有效。目的：系统评价益生菌尤其是VSL#3诱导UC缓解的有效性和安全性。方法：联机检索MEDLINE、EMBASE、CochraneLibrary和中国生物医学文献数据、万方数据库,由两名分析人员独立选取与UC诱导缓解相关、比较益生菌治疗组与对照组（安慰剂或阳性对照）的随机对照试验（不限语种）并提取数据。应用RevMan5．2．10软件行meta分析,同时行亚组分析和敏感性分析。结果：共纳入9项随机对照试验,共557例UC患者,其中4项治疗组使用VSL#3。Meta分析显示益生菌组总体诱导缓解率显著优于对照组（OR=2．05,95％CI：1．14～3．70,P=0．02）,亚组分析显示VSL#3亚组诱导缓解率显著优于对照组（OR：2．35,95％CI：1．45—3．80,P=0．0005）,其他菌种与对照组间诱导缓解率无明显差异。益生菌组、VSL#3亚组与对照组间不良反应发生率均无明显差异。敏感性分析显示meta分析结果稳定。结论：VSL#3对UC的诱导缓解作用优于对照组且安全性高。     

Clinical effectiveness of probiotics therapy (BIO-THREE) in patients with ulcerative colitis refractory to conventional therapy

OBJECTIVE: Intestinal microflora has been implicated in the etiology of ulcerative colitis (UC). Over the past few years, the use of probiotics in UC has gained attention. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of probiotics therapy for mild to moderate distal UC refractory to conventional therapies. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty patients with mild to moderate distal UC took 9 BIO-THREE tablets per day for 4 weeks. Clinical symptoms and endoscopic findings were evaluated as ulcerative colitis disease activity index (UCDAI) scores before and after administration of BIO-THREE. Fecal samples were collected from all patients before and after probiotics administration, and fecal microflora was analyzed by the terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP) method. RESULTS: Remission (UCDAI score < or =2) was observed in 45% (9/20) of the patients; response (decrease in UCDAI > or = 3, but final score > or = 3) in 10% (2/20); no response in 40% (8/20); and worsening (UCDAI > 3) in 5% (1/20). T-RFLP analysis indicated that the principal alteration in microflora was an increase in bifidobacteria. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that administration of BIO-THREE improved the clinical symptoms and endoscopic findings in patients with UC, indicating that administration of BIO-THREE is safe and efficacious for the treatment of UC.     

Bacterial and fungal microbiota in relation to probiotic therapy (VSL#3) in pouchitis

BACKGROUND: The intestinal microbiota plays a critical role in the pathophysiology of pouchitis, a major complication after ileal pouch anal anastomosis in patients with ulcerative colitis. Recently, controlled trials have demonstrated that probiotics are effective in maintenance of remission in pouchitis patients. However, the mechanism by which therapy with probiotics works remains elusive. This study explores the role of the bacterial and fungal flora in a controlled trial for maintenance of remission in pouchitis patients with the probiotic VSL#3 compound. METHODS: The mucosa associated pouch microbiota was investigated before and after therapy with VSL#3 by analysis of endoscopic biopsies using ribosomal DNA/RNA based community fingerprint analysis, clone libraries, real time polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and fluorescence in situ hybridisation. Patients were recruited from a placebo controlled remission maintenance trial with VSL#3. RESULTS: Patients who developed pouchitis while treated with placebo had low bacterial and high fungal diversity. Bacterial diversity was increased and fungal diversity was reduced in patients in remission maintained with VSL#3 (p = 0.001). Real time PCR experiments demonstrated that VSL#3 increased the total number of bacterial cells (p = 0.002) and modified the spectrum of bacteria towards anaerobic species. Taxa specific clone libraries for Lactobacilli and Bifidobacteria showed that the richness and spectrum of these bacteria were altered under probiotic therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Probiotic therapy with VSL#3 increases the total number of intestinal bacterial cells as well as the richness and diversity of the bacterial microbiota, especially the anaerobic flora. The diversity of the fungal flora is repressed. Restoration of the integrity of a "protective" intestinal mucosa related microbiota could therefore be a potential mechanism of probiotic bacteria in inflammatory barrier diseases of the lower gastrointestinal tract.     

Prophylaxis of pouchitis onset with probiotic therapy: a double-blind,placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND & AIMS: We have recently documented the efficacy of a highly concentrated probiotic preparation (VSL#3) in the prevention of flare-up in patients with chronic pouchitis. The aim of this study was to compare probiotic therapy with VSL#3 versus placebo in the ability to prevent the onset of acute pouchitis during the first year after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. METHODS: Forty consecutive patients who underwent ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis were randomized to receive either VSL#3 (1 packet containing 900 billion bacteria/day) (n = 20) or an identical placebo (n = 20) immediately after ileostomy closure for 1 year. The patients were assessed clinically, endoscopically, and histologically after 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. Health-related quality of life was assessed using the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire. RESULTS: Two of the 20 patients (10%) treated with VSL#3 had an episode of acute pouchitis compared with 8 of the 20 patients (40%) treated with placebo (log-rank test, z = 2.273; P < 0.05). Treatment with VSL#3 determined a significant improvement in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire score, whereas this was not the case with placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with VSL#3 is effective in the prevention of the onset of acute pouchitis and improves quality of life of patients with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.     

Once daily high dose probiotic therapy (VSL#3) for maintaining remission in recurrent or refractory pouchitis

BACKGROUND: Ten to 15% of patients with pouchitis experience refractory or recurrent disease. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a single daily high dose probiotic preparation (VSL#3) in maintaining antibiotic induced remission, and quality of life (QOL), for one year in such patients. METHODS: Patients with pouchitis at least twice in the previous year or requiring continuous antibiotics, associated with a pouchitis disease activity index (PDAI) > or =7 (0 = perfect; 18 = worst), in whom remission was induced by four weeks of combined metronidazole and ciprofloxacin, were randomised to receive VSL#3 6 g or placebo once daily for one year or until relapse. Symptomatic, endoscopic, and histological evaluations were made before, and two and 12 months after randomisation or at the time of relapse. Remission was defined as a clinical PDAI < or =2 and endoscopic PDAI < or =1. Relapse was defined as an increased clinical PDAI score > or =2 and increased endoscopic PDAI score > or =3. QOL was assessed using the inflammatory bowel disease questionnaire (IBDQ). RESULTS: Thirty six patients were randomised: 20 to VSL#3 and 16 to placebo. Remission was maintained at one year in 17 patients (85%) on VSL#3 and in one patient (6%) on placebo (p<0.0001). The IBDQ score remained high in the VSL#3 group (p = 0.3) but deteriorated in the placebo group (p = 0.0005). CONCLUSION: The once daily high dose probiotic VSL#3 is effective in maintaining antibiotic introduced remission for at least a year in patients with recurrent or refractory pouchitis. This is associated with a high level of quality of life.     

A prospective randomized observer-blind 2-year trial of azathioprine monotherapy versus azathioprine and olsalazine for the maintenance of remission of steroid-dependent ulcerative colitis

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this prospective study was to assess whether the coadministration of azathioprine (AZA) and olsalazine is superior to AZA monotherapy in maintaining remission of steroid-dependent ulcerative colitis (UC). METHODS: Patients with steroid-dependent UC in remission were randomized to receive AZA alone (2.2 mg/kg) or in combination with olsalazine (0.5 g tid). Remission was defined as steroid withdrawal, an Ulcerative Colitis Clinical Activity Index (UCCAI) score of <2, an Ulcerative Colitis Disease Activity Index (UCDAI) score of 0, and a negative colonoscopy and histology. Patients were followed in the outpatient clinic every month for 2 yr. The study protocol included 1) monthly clinical examination, assessment of UCCAI, hematological and biochemical tests, and compliance with treatment; 2) a sigmoidoscopy and completion of inflammatory bowel disease quality-of-life questionnaire (IBD-Q) and UCDAI every 3 months; and 3) total colonoscopy with biopsies at the end of the first and second year of the trial. RESULTS: Seventy patients were randomized to receive AZA alone (n = 34) or with olsalazine (n = 36). Three patients in each group developed side effects or could not comply with treatment and were withdrawn from the study. Three patients receiving AZA relapsed after the first year of the study and three after the second year of the study (19%). In the combination therapy group four patients relapsed after the first year of study and two after the second year of the study (18%). Relapse rates were not significant whether analyzed by intention-to-treat or per protocol. There were no significant differences between groups in time to relapse or discontinuation of treatment, UCCAI, UCDAI, or IBD-Q scores. However, the number of adverse events and the cost of treatment were significantly higher, whereas compliance with treatment was poorer in the combination therapy. CONCLUSION: Patients with steroid-dependent UC successfully maintained in remission on AZA are not in need of 5-aminosalicylic acid compounds.     

Probiotic treatments for induction and maintenance of remission in inflammatory bowel diseases: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Probiotics have been used for the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). However, the effects of probiotics on the induction and maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis (UC) or Crohn’s disease (CD) still remain controversial. This systematic review verified the findings of high-quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which investigated the therapeutic effects of probiotics on IBD. After the quality assessment, 20 RCTs which investigated the effects of probiotics on the induction or maintenance of remission in IBD were identified. From the results of the validation of these RCTs, beneficial effects of probiotic treatments to improve the response rate and remission rate on the remission induction therapies [risk ratio (RR) 1.81; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.40–2.35 and RR 1.56; 95 % CI 0.95–2.56, respectively] were verified. Furthermore, probiotic treatments exhibited effects equal to mesalazine on the maintenance of remission in UC (RR 1.00; 95 % CI 0.79–1.26). In contrast, no significant effect of probiotic treatments was shown in either the induction or maintenance of remission in CD. Because there were many variations in the conditions among these studies, a further analysis evaluating the effects of probiotic treatments in IBD is needed to clarify the optimal probiotics and treatment regimens for each condition or population in IBD patients.     

Therapeutic modulation of gut microbiota in inflammatory bowel disease: More questions to be answered

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) exhibit impaired control of the microbiome in the gut, and ‘dysbiosis’ is commonly observed. Western diet is a risk factor for the development of IBD, but it may have different effects on gut microbiota between IBD and non‐IBD individuals. Exclusive enteral nutrition (EEN) can induce remission in pediatric Crohn's disease with a decrease in gut microbial diversity. Although there are some theoretical benefits, actual treatment effects of prebiotics and probiotics in IBD vary. High‐quality studies have shown that VSL#3 (a high‐potency probiotic medical food containing eight different strains) exhibits benefits in treating ulcerative colitis, and gut microbial diversity is reduced after treated with VSL#3 in animal models. The effect of fecal microbiome transplantation on IBD is controversial. Increasing microbial diversity compared with impaired handling of bacteria presents a dilemma. Antibiotics are the strongest factors in the reduction of microbiome ecological diversity. Some antibiotics may help to induce remission of the disease. Microbiome alteration has been suggested to be an intrinsic property of IBD and a potential predictor in diagnosis and prognosis. However, the effects of therapeutic modulations are variable; thus, more questions remain to be answered.     

Oral bacteriotherapy as maintenance treatment in patients with chronic pouchitis: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Pouchitis is the major long-term complication after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis. Most patients have relapsing disease, and no maintenance treatment study has been performed. We evaluated the efficacy of a probiotic preparation (VSL#3) containing 5 x 10(11) per gram of viable lyophilized bacteria of 4 strains of lactobacilli, 3 strains of bifidobacteria, and 1 strain of Streptococcus salivarius subsp. thermophilus compared with placebo in maintenance of remission of chronic pouchitis. METHODS: Forty patients in clinical and endoscopic remission were randomized to receive either VSL#3, 6 g/day, or an identical placebo for 9 months. Patients were assessed clinically every month and endoscopically and histologically every 2 months or in the case of a relapse. Fecal samples were collected for stool culture before and after antibiotic treatment and each month during maintenance treatment. RESULTS: Three patients (15%) in the VSL#3 group had relapses within the 9-month follow-up period, compared with 20 (100%) in the placebo group (P < 0.001). Fecal concentration of lactobacilli, bifidobacteria, and S. thermophilus increased significantly from baseline levels only in the VSL#3-treated group (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that oral administration of this new probiotic preparation is effective in preventing flare-ups of chronic pouchitis.     

Clinical effectiveness of probiotics therapy (BIO-THREE) in patients with ulcerative colitis refractory to conventional therapy

Objective. Intestinal microflora has been implicated in the etiology of ulcerative colitis (UC). Over the past few years, the use of probiotics in UC has gained attention. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of probiotics therapy for mild to moderate distal UC refractory to conventional therapies. Material and methods. Twenty patients with mild to moderate distal UC took 9 BIO-THREE tablets per day for 4 weeks. Clinical symptoms and endoscopic findings were evaluated as ulcerative colitis disease activity index (UCDAI) scores before and after administration of BIO-THREE. Fecal samples were collected from all patients before and after probiotics administration, and fecal microflora was analyzed by the terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP) method. Results. Remission (UCDAI score≤2) was observed in 45% (9/20) of the patients; response (decrease in UCDAI≥3, but final score≥3) in 10% (2/20); no response in 40% (8/20); and worsening (UCDAI>3) in 5% (1/20). T-RFLP analysis indicated that the principal alteration in microflora was an increase in bifidobacteria. Conclusions. This study showed that administration of BIO-THREE improved the clinical symptoms and endoscopic findings in patients with UC, indicating that administration of BIO-THREE is safe and efficacious for the treatment of UC.     

Trichuris suis seems to be safe and possibly effective in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease

OBJECTIVES: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), especially Crohn's disease (CD), probably results from failure to downregulate a chronic Th1 intestinal inflammatory process. Induction of a Th2 immune response by intestinal helminths diminishes Th1 responsiveness. This study evaluates the safety and effectiveness of helminthic ova in the treatment of active IBD. METHODS: We studied four patients with active CD and three with ulcerative colitis (UC). In an initial treatment and observation period, a single dose of 2500 live Trichuris suis eggs was given orally, and patients were followed every 2 wk for 12 wk. Baseline medications were continued at the same dose throughout the study. Safety was monitored by following the patients' clinical status and laboratory studies at regular intervals. Patients also were monitored regularly using the Crohn's Disease Activity Index, Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index (SCCAI), and the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Quality of Life Index (IBDQ). To assess safety and efficacy with repetitive doses, two patients with CD and two with UC were given 2500 ova at 3-wk intervals as maintenance treatment using the same evaluation parameters. RESULTS: During the treatment and observation period, all patients improved clinically without any adverse clinical events or laboratory abnormalities. Three of the four patients with CD entered remission according to the Crohn's Disease Activity Index; the fourth patient experienced a clinical response (reduction of 151) but did not achieve remission. Patients with UC experienced a reduction of the Clinical Colitis Activity Index to 57% of baseline. According to the IBD Quality of Life Index, six of seven patients (86%) achieved remission. The benefit derived from the initial dose was temporary. In the maintenance period, multiple doses again caused no adverse effects and sustained clinical improvement in all patients treated every 3 wk for >28 wk. CONCLUSIONS: This open trial demonstrates that it is safe to administer eggs from the porcine whipworm, Trichuris suis, to patients with CD and UC. It also demonstrates improvement in the common clinical indices used to describe disease activity. The benefit was temporary in some patients with a single dose, but it could be prolonged with maintenance therapy every 3 wk. The study suggests that it is possible to downregulate aberrant intestinal inflammation in humans with helminths.     

Diet therapy for inflammatory bowel diseases: The established and the new

Although patients with inflammatory bowel diseases(IBD) have a strong interest in dietary modifications as part of their therapeutic management, dietary advice plays only a minor part in published guidelines. The scientific literature shows that dietary factors might influence the risk of developing IBD, that dysbiosis induced by nutrition contributes to the pathogenesis of IBD, and that diet may serve as a symptomatic treatment for irritable bowel syndrome-like symptoms in IBD. The role of nutrition in IBD is underscored by the effect of various dietary therapies. In paediatric patients with Crohn’s disease(CD) enteral nutrition(EN) reaches remission rates similar to steroids. In adult patients, however, EN is inferior to corticosteroids. EN is not effective in ulcerative colitis(UC). Total parenteral nutrition in IBD is not superior to steroids or EN. The use of specific probiotics in patients with IBD can be recommended only in special clinical situations. There is no evidence for efficacy of probiotics in CD. By contrast, studies in UC have shown a beneficial effect in selected patients. For patients with pouchitis, antibiotic treatment followed by probiotics, like VSL#3 or Lactobacillus GG, is effective. When probiotics are used, the risk of bacterial translocation and subsequent bacteremia has to be considered. More understanding of the normal intestinal microflora, and better characterization of probiotic strains at the phenotypic and genomic levels is needed as well as clarification of the mechanisms of action in different clinical settings. A FODMAP reduced diet may improve symptoms in IBD.     

Granulocytapheresis in inflammatory bowel disease. Efficacy of an induction plus maintenance sessions protocol at 32 weeks]

INTRODUCTION: Granulocytapheresis (GCAP) eliminates activated granulocytes-monocytes from peripheral blood, thus modifying the circulating pool of leukocytes and reducing intestinal inflammation. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of GCAP in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) using an induction and maintenance protocol. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A retrospective study including patients with active corticosteroid-dependent or refractory IBD. Induction included 5 sessions in ulcerative colitis (UC) and 7 sessions in Crohn's disease (CD); one monthly session was used thereafter until week 32. Clinical activity indices and use of corticosteroids were monitored. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were included (10 with UC, 8 with CD), 10 of them dependent on and 8 refractory to corticosteroids. Fourteen of them were refractory and a further 4 were intolerant to immunosuppressants (IS). Induction was not completed in 2 UC (severe relapses) and 1 CD (side-effects) patients. One UC and 3 CD patients withdrew during maintenance. Among patients who completed induction, response or remission was achieved in 87.5% of UC cases (2 and 5 patients) and 71.4% of CD cases (1 and 4 patients), respectively. At week 32 response-remission rates reached 75% in CU (3 and 3 patients) and 42.8% in CD (1 and 2 patients) cases, respectively. Corticosteroid withdrawal was possible in 14.2% of CD and in 62.5% of UC patients (25% in remission and 37.5% with response). There were two major side effects (thrombophlebitis and syncope). No colectomies were performed for UC patients who completed GCAP induction after a mean follow-up of 97.6 weeks (range: 72-128). CONCLUSIONS: both UC and CD respond well to GCAP induction. At 32 weeks UC patients maintain similar response-remission rates (87.5 vs. 75%), whereas almost one-third of CD patients lose response. Granolocytapheresis is an alternative, steroid-sparing treatment modality to induce and maintain remission in UC, while good patient selection and a maintenance protocol not well defined yet are needed for CD.     

Tacrolimus is safe and effective in patients with severe steroid-refractory or steroid-dependent inflammatory bowel disease--a long-term follow-up

OBJECTIVE: We and others have reported the use of tacrolimus in refractory inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Little is known about its long-term efficacy and safety. METHODS: In this retrospective, observational single center study the charts of 53 adult patients with steroid-dependent (n = 18) or steroid-refractory (n = 35) IBD, Crohn's disease (CD) (n = 11), ulcerative colitis (UC) (n = 40), or pouchitis (PC) (n = 2) were reviewed. Tacrolimus (0.1 mg/kg body weight per day) was administered orally in all and initially intravenously in 2 patients (0.01 mg/kg body weight per day), aiming for serum trough levels of 4-8 ng/mL. Forty-one of 53 (77.1%) patients were receiving concomitant azathioprine. The mean treatment duration was 25.2 +/- 4.6 SD months (0.43-164 months). Patients were followed for a mean of 39 +/- 4.1 SD months (5-164 months). Response was evaluated using a modified clinical activity index (M-CAI). RESULTS: Thirty-one UC (78%), 10 CD (90.1%), and both PC (100%) patients experienced an immediate clinical response or went into remission at 30 days. A statistically significant drop on the M-CAI was documented for UC and CD patients. Nine UC patients (22.5%) underwent colectomy between 1.6 and 41.3 months following initiation. Mean colectomy-free survival was 104.8 +/- 15.5 (95% CI 74.4-135.2) months (limited to 164.4 months). Cumulative colectomy-free survival was estimated 56.5% at 43.8 months. Steroids were reduced or discontinued in 40 of 45 UC and CD patients (90%) taking steroids. Side effects included a temporary rise of creatinine (n = 4, 7.6%), tremor or paresthesias (n = 5, 9.4%), hyperkalemia (n = 1, 1.9%), hypertension (n = 1, 1.9%), and opportunistic infections (n = 2, 3.8%). CONCLUSION: Long-term tacrolimus therapy appears safe and effective in refractory IBD.     

糖皮质激素治疗炎症性肠病的随访研究

目的 回顾性分析糖皮质激素治疗炎症性肠病(IBD)1个月的疗效及1年后的转归.方法 1998年1月至2006年9年确诊为克罗恩病(CD)患者55例,溃疡性结肠炎(UC)患者154例,评估口服糖皮质激素治疗1个月和1年后的疗效.Logistic回归分析决定预后的影响因子.结果 共有21例(38.2%)CD患者和20例(13.0 %)UC患者口服糖皮质激素(2例UC患者失访).经1个月治疗后,21例CD患者中完全缓解15例(71.4%),部分缓解3例(14.3%),无效3例(14.3%);18例UC患者中,完全缓解15例(83.3%),部分缓解3例(16.7%).随访1年时,21例CD患者中,维持完全或部分缓解11例(52.4%),激素依赖6例(28.6%),被迫接受外科手术者4例(19.0%),18例UC患者中,维持完全或部分缓解11例(61.1%),激素依赖3例(16.7%),手术4例(22.2%).Logistic回归分析显示,发病时血清白蛋白水平与1年后的疗效有关(OR=1.320,95%CI:1. 032～1.690,P=0.027).结论 IBD患者对首次激素治疗有效,近期疗效良好.但无法长期维持缓解状态,亦无法降低手术风险.其预后与血清白蛋白水平相关.     

Medium-term results of oral tacrolimus treatment in refractory inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of oral tacrolimus in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) refractory to conventional therapy, including azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine, and infliximab. METHODS: Retrospective review of all patients with IBD treated with oral tacrolimus was undertaken. Tacrolimus was administered t an initial dose of 0.05 mg/kg twice daily, aiming for serum trough levels of 5-10 ng/mL. We evaluated clinical response, a retrospective estimated Crohn's disease activity index (CDAI) for Crohn's disease (CD), modified Truelove-Witts index for ulcerative colitis (UC), and modified pouch disease activity index (mPDAI) for pouchitis. Patients had been monitored clinically for benefit and side effects and by whole blood tacrolimus level approximately every 4 weeks for the duration of treatment. Clinical remission was defined as an estimated CDAI <150 (CD), an inactive disease score on the Truelove-Witts index (UC), and mPDAI <5 (pouchitis). RESULTS: Twelve patients with CD, six with UC, and one with pouchitis, all resistant to previous therapies, were treated for a median of 5 months. After 4 weeks 10 CD (83%), four UC (67%) patients, and one pouchitis patient had a clinical response. There was a median reduction of the estimated CDAI of 108 points (range 35-203; P = 0.002) and stool frequency of three per day at week 4. Remission was achieved in 42% (5/12) of CD and 50% (3/6) of UC patients at the end of follow-up. Side effects included temporary elevated creatinine (n = 1), tremor (n = 3), arthralgia (n = 1), insomnia (n = 1), and malaise (n = 1). Four patients discontinued treatment due to side effects. CONCLUSION-: Oral tacrolimus is well tolerated and effective in patients with refractory IBD in the short- to medium-term. Further controlled, long-term evaluation is warranted.     

Use of mycophenolate mofetil in inflammatory bowel disease

AIM： To assess the efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil （MMF） prospectively in inflammatory bowel disease （IBD） patients intolerant or refractory to conventional medical therapy.
METHODS： Crohn＇s disease （CD） or ulcerative colitis/ IBD unclassified （UC/IBDU） patients intolerant or refractory to conventional medical therapy received MMF （500-2000 mg bid）. Clinical response was assessed by the Harvey Bradshaw index （HBI） or colitis activity index （CAI） after 2, 6 and 12 mo of therapy, as were steroid usage and adverse effects.
RESULTS： Fourteen patients （9 CD/5 UC/IBDU; 8M/6F; mean age 50.4 years, range 28-67 years） were treated and prospectively assessed for their response to oral MMF. Of the 11 patients who were not in remission on commencing MMF, 7/11 （63.6%） achieved remission by 8 wk. All 3 patients in remission on commencing MMF maintained their remission. Ten patients were still on MMF at 6 mo with 9/14 （64.3%） in remission, while of 12 patients followed for 12 mo, 8 were in remission without dose escalation （66.7%）. Three patients were withdrawn from the MMF due to drug intolerance. There were no serious adverse events attributed due to the medication.
CONCLUSION： MMF demonstrated efficacy in the management of difficult IBD. MMF appeared safe, well tolerated and efficacious for both short and long-term therapy, without the need for dose escalation. Further evaluation of MMF comparing it to conventional immunosuppressants is required.     

Patients with active inflammatory bowel disease lack immature peripheral blood plasmacytoid and myeloid dendritic cells

BACKGROUND: Breakdown of tolerance against the commensal microflora is believed to be a major factor in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Dendritic cells (DC) have been implicated in this process in various animal models, but data on human DC in IBD are very limited. AIM: To characterise plasmacytoid DC (PDC) and myeloid DC (MDC) in patients with active versus inactive IBD and healthy controls. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Peripheral blood was obtained from 106 patients (Crohn's disease (CD) n=49, ulcerative colitis (UC) n=57) and healthy controls (n=19). Disease activity was scored using the modified Truelove Witts (MTWSI) for UC and the Harvey Bradshaw severity indices (HBSI) for CD. Four colour flow cytometric analysis was used to identify, enumerate, and phenotype DC. DC from patients with acute flare ups and healthy controls were cultured and stimulated with CpG ODN 2006 or lipopolysaccharide (LPS). RESULTS: IBD patients in remission (PDC UC, 0.39%; CD, 0.35%; MDC-1 UC, 0.23%; CD, 0.22% of PBMC) have slightly lower numbers of circulating DC compared with healthy controls (PDC 0.41%, MDC-1 0.25% of PBMC). In acute flare ups IBD patients experience a significant drop of DC (PDC UC, 0.04%; CD, 0.11%; MDC-1 UC, 0.11%; CD, 0.14% of PBMC) that correlates with disease activity (correlation coefficients: PDC MTWSI, 0.93; HBSI, 0.79; MDC-1 MTWSI, 0.75; HBSI, 0.81). Moreover, both express alpha4beta7 integrin and display an immature phenotype. Freshly isolated PDC and MDC-1 from untreated flaring IBD patients express higher baseline levels of CD86 which increases further in culture and upon stimulation compared with healthy controls. CONCLUSION: IBD patients lack immature blood DC during flare ups which possibly migrate to the gut. An aberrant response to microbial surrogate stimuli suggests a disturbed interaction with commensals.     

Effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab for maintenance treatment in inflammatory bowel disease—The Israeli real world experience

Introduction

Several real-world experience (RWE) studies with vedolizumab (VDZ) for induction of remission in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) have been published; however, long-term RWE data is scarce.

Active Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis can be specifically diagnosed and monitored based on the biostructure of the fecal flora

BACKGROUND: The intestinal microflora is important in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The impact of its spatial organization on health and disease is unknown. METHODS: We investigated sections of paraffin-embedded punched fecal cylinders. Fluctuations in spatial distribution of 11 bacterial groups were monitored in healthy subjects (n = 32), patients with IBD (n = 204), and other gastrointestinal diseases (n = 186) using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). RESULTS: The microbial structure differed in patients with Crohn's disease (CD), ulcerative colitis (UC), and healthy and disease controls. The profiles of CD and UC were distinctly opposite in 6 of 11 FISH probes used. Most prominent were a depletion of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii (Fprau<1 x 10(9)/mL) with a normal leukocyte count in CD and a massive increase of leukocytes in the fecal-mucus transition zone (>30 leukocytes/10(4) microm(2)) with high Fprau in patients with UC. These 2 features alone enabled the recognition of active CD (Crohn's Disease Activity Index [CDAI] >150) or UC (Clinical Activity Index [CAI] >3) with 79%/80% sensitivity and 98%/100% specificity. The mismatch in the sensitivity was mainly due to overlap between single IBD entities, and the specificity was exclusively due to the similarity of Crohn's and celiac disease. When inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients were pooled the sensitivity was 100% for severe disease, 84% for moderate activity, 72% for IBD with < or =12 months remission, and 24% for IBD with >12 months remission. CONCLUSIONS: The fecal flora is highly structured and spatially organized. Diagnosing IBD and monitoring disease activity can be performed based on analysis of punched fecal cylinders independent from the patient's complaints.