Substrate modification by pulmonary vein isolation and left atrial linear ablation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation: its impact on complex-fractionated atrial electrograms

PV and Linear Ablation for CFAEs . Introduction: Linear ablations in the left atrium (LA), in addition to pulmonary vein (PV) isolation, have been demonstrated to be an effective ablation strategy in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (PsAF). This study investigated the impact of LA linear ablation on the complex‐fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAEs) of PsAF patients. Methods and Results: A total of 40 consecutive PsAF patients (age: 54 ± 10 years, 39 males) who underwent catheter ablation were enrolled in this study. Linear ablation of both roofline between the right and left superior PVs and the mitral isthmus line joining from the mitral annulus to the left inferior PV were performed following PV isolation during AF. High‐density automated CFAE mapping was performed using the NAVX, and maps were obtained 3 times during the procedure (prior to ablation, after PV isolation, and after linear ablations) and were compared. PsAF was terminated by ablation in 13 of 40 patients. The mean total LA surface area and baseline CFAEs area were 120.8 ± 23.6 and 88.0 ± 23.5 cm² (74.2%), respectively. After PV isolation and linear ablations in the LA, the area of CFAEs area was reduced to 71.6 ± 22.6 cm² (58.7%) (P < 0.001) and 44.9 ± 23.0 cm² (39.2%) (P < 0.001), respectively. The LA linear ablations resulted in a significant reduction of the CFAEs area percentage in the region remote from ablation sites (from 56.3 ± 20.6 cm² (59.6%) to 40.4 ± 16.5 cm² (42.9%), P < 0.0001). Conclusion: Both PV isolation and LA linear ablations diminished the CFAEs in PsAF patients, suggesting substrate modification by PV and linear ablations. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 23, pp. 962‐970, September 2012)     

Automated detection and characterization of complex fractionated atrial electrograms in human left atrium during atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND: Complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAEs) have been reported as ablative targets for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the process of CFAE identification is highly dependent on the operator's judgment. OBJECTIVE: It is the aim of the study to report our initial experience with a novel software algorithm designed to automatically detect CFAEs. METHODS: Nineteen patients (6 female, 58 +/- 8 years) who underwent catheter ablation of paroxysmal (n = 11) or persistent (n = 8) AF were included in the study. During ongoing AF, 100 +/- 15 left atrial (LA) endocardial locations were sampled under the guidance of integrated electroanatomical mapping with computed tomographic images. Bipolar electrograms recorded throughout the LA were analyzed using custom software that allows for automated detection of CFAEs. Interval confidence level (ICL), defined as the number of intervals between consecutive CFAE complexes during 2.5-second recordings, was used to characterize CFAEs. The CFAE sites with an ICL >/=5 were considered as sites with highly repetitive CFAEs, which are thought to be potential ablation targets. For purposes of analysis, the LA was divided into 6 areas: pulmonary vein (PV) ostia, posterior wall, interatrial septum, roof, mitral annulus area, and appendage. RESULTS: Among a total of 1,904 LA locations sampled in 19 patients, 1,644 (86%) were categorized as CFAE sites, whereas 260 (14%) were categorized as as non-CFAE sites. Thirty-four percent of all CFAE sites were identified as sites with highly repetitive CFAEs. Of these, 24% were located at the interatrial septum, 22% on the posterior wall, 20% at the PV ostia, 18% at the mitral annulus area, 14% on the roof, and 2.7% at the LA appendage. In all patients, highly repetitive CFAE sites were distributed in 4 or more areas of the LA. Persistent AF patients had more highly repetitive CFAE sites on the posterior wall than paroxysmal AF patients (30% +/- 7.3% vs 14% +/- 8.2%, P < .001). There was a strong trend toward more highly repetitive CFAE sites located at the PV ostia in patients with paroxysmal AF compared with persistent AF patients (24% +/- 13% vs 13% +/- 7.7%, P = .05). CONCLUSION: With the use of custom software, CFAE complexes were identified in more than 80% of the LA endocardial locations. LA sites with highly repetitive CFAE sites were located predominately in the septum, posterior wall, and PV ostia. Patients with persistent AF had a different anatomical distribution pattern of highly repetitive CFAE sites from those with paroxysmal AF, with a greater prevalence of highly repetitive CFAEs located on the posterior wall. Further studies are warranted to determine the clinical significance of these findings.     

Identifying the relationship between the non-PV triggers and the critical CFAE sites post-PVAI to curtail the extent of atrial ablation in longstanding persistent AF

Relationship Between the Non‐PV Triggers and the Critical CFAE Sites. Background: Complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAE) ablation has been performed in addition to pulmonary veins (PV) isolation to increase the success rate of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation in patients with longstanding (LS) persistent AF. The mechanism underlying the clinical benefit of CFAE ablation remains, however, poorly understood. Objective: We compared the impact of CFAE ablation on the prevalence of non‐PV atrial triggers inducing AF in 2 groups of patients with LS persistent AF. One group underwent PVAI alone, and the other group underwent PVAI plus CFAE ablation. In addition, we correlated the site of non‐PV triggers with the presence of CFAE. Methods: A total of 98 consecutive patients with symptomatic drug refractory LS persistent AF presenting for ablation had a preablation electroanatomic CFAE map. Patients randomized to either isolation of the PVs and posterior wall (PVAI) (group I, n = 48 pts) or PVAI and biatrial ablation of CFAEs (group II, 50 pts). After ablation, infusion of isoproterenol up to 30 mcg/min was given to reveal non PV foci inducing AF. Those foci were mapped and correlated with CFAE regions and ablated. Results: A total of 19 patients (76%) with PV foci inducing AF were associated with either stable or transient CFAE after PVAI, respectively, in 12 patients (48%) and 7 patients (28%). A total of 20 (42%) non‐PV triggers were observed in group I versus 5 (10%) in group II (P < 0.001) in 18 and 5 patients, respectively. After a mean f/u of 17.2 ± 5.2 months, 33 (69%) patients in group I and 36 (72%) patients in group II were in SR (P = NS). Conclusion: Non‐PV triggers inducing AF post‐PVAI were associated with the presence of stable or transient CFAE in 48% and 28% of cases, respectively, in LS persistent AF. CFAE ablation after PVAI was associated with a significantly higher elimination of those non‐PV triggers. This suggests that at least part of the beneficial effect achieved by CFAE ablation reflects elimination of non‐PV AF triggers. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. pp. 1‐7)     

Impact of pre-existent areas of complex fractionated atrial electrograms on outcome after pulmonary vein isolation

Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) drivers outside pulmonary veins (PV) may account for failure after PV isolation. The aim of this study was to characterize pre-existent areas of complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAEs) recorded in right atrium (RA) and in coronary sinus (CS) during catheter-based PV isolation and to assess their relation to outcome. Methods and results With a tricuspid annulus and CS mapping, CFAEs were retrospectively identified in consecutive patients who underwent PV isolation. Of 224 patients, 161 were found to have CFAEs (81%). No clinical variable was found to be predictive of CFAEs presence. By Kaplan–Meier analysis, following a median follow-up of 23.7 months after a single ablation procedure, 62.8% of patients in the CFAEs(+) group and 85.4% of those in the CFAEs(−) group were free from recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmias (p = 0.013). Multivariable Cox regression analysis showed that CFAEs evidence was an independent predictor of recurrence (p = 0.007). Conclusions Pre-existent CFAEs, that can be easily identified in RA and CS during PV isolation, are a powerful independent predictor for AF recurrence. This finding may be helpful for refining AF ablation strategies.     

Efficacy of repeat pulmonary vein isolation procedures in patients with recurrent atrial fibrillation

INTRODUCTION: Pulmonary vein (PV) isolation is effective in the treatment of most patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Some advocate the addition of linear ablation techniques to improve efficacy; however, previous studies suggest recurrent PV conduction is responsible for AF recurrence. The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of repeat PV isolation in patients with recurrent AF after an initial ablation procedure and to determine if any patient characteristics predict failure of repeat PV isolation procedures. METHODS AND RESULTS: Seventy-four patients with two or more AF ablation procedures using selective PV isolation were included. PV isolation was guided with multielectrode ring catheter recordings, electroanatomic mapping, and intracardiac electrocardiography. Radiofrequency energy was delivered using a 4-mm-tip catheter (maximum 40 W, 52 degrees C); cooled-tip ablation was performed in 10 patients. Linear ablation was not performed. Antiarrhythmic drugs were continued for at least 6 weeks after ablation; AF episodes during this period were censored. Reconnection of one or more segments of previously ablated PVs was observed in 97% of patients; reconnected PVs served as the trigger for AF in 77%. Repeat PV isolation resulted in AF control (cure or 90% reduction in AF episodes) in 64 patients (86%) over a follow-up period of 9.1 +/- 6.7 months. "High-risk" characteristics such as left atrial enlargement, persistent AF, or mitral regurgitation did not predict failure of repeat PV isolation procedures. CONCLUSION: Recurrent AF following selective PV isolation is overwhelmingly associated with PV electrical reconnection. Repeat PV isolation without linear ablation provides effective treatment for recurrent AF in patients in whom an initial PV isolation procedure failed, independent of clinical characteristics.     

联合复杂碎裂电位消融及肺静脉电隔离治疗持续性心房颤动

目的研究联合复杂碎裂电位（comp lex fractionated atrial electrogram s,CFAEs）消融及环肺静脉电隔离（c ircum ferential pu lmonary ve in isolation,CPVI）治疗心房颤动（atrial fibrillation,AF）的有效性及安全性。方法持续性AF患者36例,首先进行环肺静脉消融,然后进行左房CFAEs消融,消融中恢复窦性心律则予以诱发AF;结束CFAEs消融未恢复窦性心律者进行电复律。结果 36例患者完成CPVI及CFAEs消融,5例恢复窦性心律;4例于消融中转为房扑;27例患者完成左房CFAEs消融后仍为房颤节律,31例患者进行了电复律,2例患者电复律失败继续进行了线性消融。平均随访12±2个月,CFAEs＋CPVI组32例患者一次手术成功率67.6%。结论联合CFAEs＋CPVI治疗持续性心房颤动是有效的。     

Characterization of conduction recovery across left atrial linear lesions in patients with paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation

Background: Left atrial (LA) linear lesions are effective in substrate modification for atrial fibrillation (AF). However, achievement of complete conduction block remains challenging and conduction recovery is commonly observed. The aim of the study was to investigate the localization of gap sites of recovered LA linear lesions.
Methods and Results: Forty-eight patients with paroxysmal (n = 26) and persistent/permanent (n = 22) AF underwent repeat ablation after pulmonary vein (PV) isolation and LA linear ablation at the LA roof and/or mitral isthmus due to recurrences of AF or flutter. In 35 patients, conduction through the mitral isthmus line (ML) had recovered whereas roof-line recovery was observed in 30 patients. The gaps within the ML were distributed to the junction between left inferior PV and left atrial appendage in 66%, the middle part of the ML in 20%, and in 8% to the endocardial aspect of the ML while only 6% of lines showed an epicardial site of recovery. The RL predominantly recovered close to the right superior PV (54%) and less frequently in the mid roof or close to the left PV (both 23%). Reablation of lines required significantly shorter RF durations (ML: 7.24 ± 5.55 minutes vs 24.08 ± 9.38 minutes, RL: 4.24 ± 2.34 minutes vs 11.54 ± 6.49 minutes; P = 0.0001). Patients with persistent/permanent AF demonstrated a significantly longer conduction delay circumventing the complete lines than patients with paroxysmal AF (228 ± 77 ms vs 164 ± 36 ms, P = 0.001).
Conclusions: Gaps in recovered LA lines were predominantly located close to the PVs where catheter stability is often difficult to achieve. Shorter RF durations are required for reablation of recovered linear lesions. Conduction times around complete LA lines are significantly longer in patients with persistent/permanent AF as compared to patients with paroxysmal AF.     

Diagnostic accuracy of a new software for complex fractionated electrograms identification in patients with persistent and permanent atrial fibrillation

Introduction: The elimination of complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAEs) has been proposed as a potential target for guiding successful AF substrate ablation. The possibility to efficiently map the atria and rapidly identify CFAEs sites is necessary, before the CFAEs ablation becomes a routine approach. The aims of this study, conducted in patients with persistent and permanent atrial fibrillation (AF), were to analyze by CARTO mapping in the right (RA) and in the left atrium (LA) during AF: (1) the diagnostic accuracy of a new software for CFAEs analysis, (2) the spatial distribution of CFAEs, (3) the regional beat to beat AF intervals (FF). Methods and Results: Twenty‐five consecutive patients (four women, 58.8 ± 11.4 years) undergoing radiofrequency catheter ablation for persistent and permanent AF were enrolled in the study. The CFAE software showed a high sensitivity (90%) and specificity (91%) in the identification of CFAEs, using a specific setting of parameters. The LA had a significantly higher prevalence of CFAEs as compared with the RA (30.5% vs 20.3%, P = 0.016). The CFAEs were mostly present in the septum and in the area of coronary sinus ostium (CS os). The FF intervals were significantly shorter in the LA than in the RA (P < 0.01). Conclusion: CARTO system has a high diagnostic accuracy in the identification of CFAEs. Atrial electrical activity (CFAEs, mean FF intervals) during AF showed a significant spatial inhomogeneity.     

Catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation: The importance of substrate modification

Accumulating data have shown that elimination of atrial fibrillation (AF) sources should be the goal in persistent AF ablation. Pulmonary vein isolation, linear lesions and complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAEs) ablation have shown limited efficacy in patients with persistent AF. A combined approach using voltage, CFAEs and dominant frequency (DF) mapping may be helpful for the identification of AF sources and subsequent focal substrate modification. The fibrillatory activity is maintained by intramural reentry centered on fibrotic patches. Voltage mapping may assist in the identification of fibrotic areas. Stable rotors display the higher DF and possibly drive AF. Furthermore, the single rotor is usually consistent with organized AF electrograms without fractionation. It is therefore quite possible that rotors are located at relatively “healthy islands” within the patchy fibrosis. This is supported by the fact that high DF sites have been negatively correlated to the amount of fibrosis. CFAEs are located in areas adjacent to high DF. In conclusion, patchy fibrotic areas displaying the maximum DF along with high organization index and the lower fractionation index are potential targets of ablation. Prospective studies are required to validate the efficacy of substrate modification in left atrial ablation outcomes.     

Long- and Short-Term Temporal Stability of Complex Fractionated Atrial Electrograms in Human Left Atrium During Atrial Fibrillation

Background: Complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAEs) have been reported as targets for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the temporal stability of CFAE sites remains poorly defined.
Methods and Results: The study consisted of two phases. In the initial phase, two automated software algorithms, namely the interval confidence level (ICL) and the average interpotential interval (AIPI) were assessed for their diagnostic accuracy for automated CFAE detection. The AIPI was found to be superior to the ICL, and an AIPI of ≤100 ms was associated with a sensitivity and specificity of both 92% for detection of CFAEs. In the second phase of the study, 12 patients (2 females, mean age 54 ± 12 years) who underwent catheter ablation for persistent AF were studied to investigate the temporal stability of CFAEs. Two consecutive left atrial (LA) three-dimensional CFAE maps coded with AIPI readings were reconstructed during ongoing AF in each study patient, with a mean time difference of 34.3 ± 8.7 minutes between the two maps. Among a total of 149 CFAE sites and 238 non-CFAE sites on the first CFAE map that were precisely revisited during the repeat mapping process, 135 (90.6%) and 225 (94.5%) remained as CFAE sites and non-CFAE sites, respectively. RF ablation at the selected stable CFAE sites significantly prolonged AF cycle length (181 ± 26 ms to 199 ± 29 ms, P < 0.0001).
Conclusion: CFAEs recorded in the LA during AF display high temporal stability in patients with persistent AF. The clinical significance of our findings warrants further investigation.     

Characteristics of Complex Fractionated Electrograms in Nonpulmonary Vein Ectopy Initiating Atrial Fibrillation/Atrial Tachycardia

Background: Nonpulmonary vein (PV) ectopy initiating atrial fibrillation (AF)/atrial tachycardia (AT) is not uncommon in patients with AF. The relationship of complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAEs) and non‐PV ectopy initiating AF/AT has not been assessed. We aimed to characterize the CFAEs in the non‐PV ectopy initiating AF/AT. Methods: Twenty‐three patients (age 53 ± 11 y/o, 19 males) who underwent a stepwise AF ablation with coexisting PV and non‐PV ectopy initiating AF or AT were included. CFAE mapping was applied before and after the PV isolation in both atria by using a real‐time NavX electroanatomic mapping system. A CFAE was defined as a fractionation interval (FI) of less than 120 ms over 8‐second duration. A continuous CFAE (mostly, an FI < 50 ms) was defined as electrogram fractionation or repetitive rapid activity lasting for more than 8 seconds. Results: All patients (100%) with non‐PV ectopy initiating AF or AT demonstrated corresponding continuous CFAEs at the firing foci. There was no significant difference in the FI among the PV ostial or non‐PV atrial ectopy or other atrial CFAEs (54.1 ± 5.6, 58.3 ± 11.3, 52.8 ± 5.8 ms, P = 0.12). Ablation targeting those continuous CFAEs terminated the AF and AT and eliminated the non‐PV ectopy in all patients (100%). During a follow‐up of 7 months, 22% of the patients had an AF recurrence with PV reconnections. There was no recurrence of any ablated non‐PV ectopy during the follow‐up. Conclusion: The sites of the origin of the non‐PV ectopies were at the same location as those of the atrial continuous CFAEs. Those non‐PV foci were able to initiate and sustain AF/AT. By limited ablation targeting all atrial continuous CFAEs, the AF could be effectively eliminated.     

Atrial fibrillation and effective refractory period of the pulmonary vein ostia.

BACKGROUND: The pathogenesis of atrial fibrillation (AF) is not completely understood. The role of pulmonary veins (PV) in AF initiation is documented, and the recent demonstration of persistent fibrillatory activity in an isolated PV suggests that the PV play a role in the maintenance of AF. OBJECTIVE: Since AF is facilitated by multiple reentry circuits in atrial tissue with short effective refractory periods (ERP) and prolonged conduction times, we investigated whether PV have shorter ERP compared with the left atrium (LA). POPULATION AND METHODS: The study population consisted of five male patients, between 45 and 78 years of age, with normal sized LA; three had coronary artery bypass surgery (and no previous history of atrial arrhythmias) and two had paroxysmal lone AF refractory to antiarrhythmic drugs and were referred for percutaneous ablation with radiofrequency energy. In the surgical patients, epicardial bipolar pacing wires were inserted in the PV ostia and LA roof at the end of the procedure. Post-operatively, the pacing wires were used to determine atrial thresholds and ERP in the PV ostia and LA roof. In the AF patients, atrial thresholds and ERP at these locations were obtained with the mapping/ablation catheter before and after PV isolation. ERP were determined with a basic pacing cycle length of 500 ms and a single extrastimulus with an initial coupling interval of 350 ms, gradually decreased (10 ms at a time) until atrial capture failure or AF induction. RESULTS: ERP in the LA roof were longer than 210 ms. The shortest ERP was always obtained in a PV ostium, with the shortest in the left PV ostia. The ERP values of the right inferior PV most resembled those of the LA roof. In patients referred for ablation, AF was induced when PV ostia with ERP shorter than 200 ms were stimulated. CONCLUSION: In the present study, the ERP of PV ostia were shorter than LA ERP, possibly explaining not only the presence of ectopic foci in the PV ostia, but also sustained fibrillatory activity in isolated PV, despite conversion of the atria to sinus rhythm. This fact may also explain the higher success rate and the preference for PV isolation in AF ablation.     

Does Left Atrial Volume and Pulmonary Venous Anatomy Predict the Outcome of Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation?

Introduction: Preprocedural factors may be helpful in selecting patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) for treatment with catheter ablation and in making an assumption regarding their prognosis. The aims of this study were to investigate whether left atrial (LA) volume and pulmonary venous (PV) anatomy, evaluated by computed tomography (CT) prior to ablation, will predict AF recurrence following catheter ablation.
Methods and Results: We included 146 patients (mean age 57 ± 11 years, 83% male) with symptomatic AF (55% paroxysmal, 18% persistent, 27% long-standing persistent). All patients underwent CT scanning prior to catheter ablation to evaluate LA volume and PV anatomy. Circumferential PV isolation was performed guided by Cartomerge electroanatomical mapping. The outcome was defined as complete success, improvement, or failure.
After a mean follow-up of 19 ±7 months, complete success was achieved in 59 patients (40%), and 38 patients (26%) demonstrated improvement. LA volume was found to be an independent predictor of AF recurrence with an adjusted OR of 1.14 for every 10-mL increase in volume (95% CI 1.00–1.29, P = 0.047). PV variations were equally distributed among the different outcomes of the ablation procedure, and therefore univariate analysis did not identify PV anatomy as a predictor of outcome.
Conclusion: LA volume is an independent predictor of AF recurrence after catheter ablation. Additionally, PV anatomy did not have any effect on the outcome. These findings suggest that an assessment of LA volume may be incorporated into the preprocedural evaluation of patients being considered for AF ablation.     

Hybrid epicardial and endocardial ablation of persistent or permanent atrial fibrillation: a new approach for difficult cases

Background : Although percutaneous epicardial catheter ablation (PECA) has been used for the management of epicardial ventricular tachycardia, the use of PECA for atrial fibrillation (AF) has not yet been reported.
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of a hybrid PECA and endocardial ablation for AF.
Methods: We performed PECA for AF in five patients (48.6 ± 8.1 years old, all male, four redo ablation procedures of persistent AF with a risk of pulmonary vein (PV) stenosis, one de novo ablation of permanent [AF]) after an endocardial AF ablation guided by PV potentials and 3D mapping (NavX). Utilizing an open irrigation tip catheter, a left atrial (LA) linear ablation from the roof to the perimitral isthmus or localized ablation at the junction between the LA appendage and left-sided PVs or ligament of Marshall (LOM) was performed.
Results: PECA of AF was successful in all patients with an ablation time of <15 minutes. The left-sided PV potentials were eliminated by PECA in all patients. Bidirectional block of the perimitral line was achieved in two of two patients and a left inferior PV tachycardia with conduction block to the LA was observed during the ablation in the area of the LOM in one patient. A hemopericardium developed in one patient, but was controlled successfully. During 8.0 ± 6.3 months of follow-up, all patients have remained in sinus rhythm (four patients without antiarrhythmic drugs).
Conclusion: A hybrid PECA of AF is feasible and effective in patients with redo-AF ablation procedures and at risk for left-sided PV stenosis or who are resistant to endocardial linear ablation.     

Prospective study of atrial fibrillation termination during ablation guided by automated detection of fractionated electrograms

Introduction: Complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAE) may identify critical sites for perpetuation of atrial fibrillation (AF) and provide useful targets for ablation. Current assessment of CFAE is subjective; automated detection algorithms may improve reproducibility, but their utility in guiding ablation has not been tested.
Methods and Results: In 67 patients presenting for initial AF ablation (42 paroxysmal, 25 persistent), LA and CS mapping were performed during induced or spontaneous AF. CFAE were identified by an online automated computer algorithm and displayed on electroanatomical maps. A mean of 28 ± 18 sites/patient were identified (20 ± 13% of mapped sites), and were more frequent during persistent AF. CFAE occurred most commonly within the CS, on the atrial septum, and around the pulmonary veins. Ablation initially targeting CFAE terminated AF in 88% of paroxysmal AF, but only 20% of persistent AF (P < 0.001). Subsequently, additional ablation was performed in all patients (PV isolation for paroxysmal AF, PV isolation + mitral and roof lines for persistent AF). Minimum follow-up was 1 year. One-year freedom from recurrent atrial arrhythmias without antiarrhythmic drug therapy after a single procedure was 90% for paroxysmal AF, and 68% for persistent AF.
Conclusions: Ablation guided by automated detection of CFAE proved feasible, and was associated with a high AF termination rate in paroxysmal, but not persistent AF. As an adjunct to conventional techniques, it was associated with excellent long-term single procedure outcomes in both groups. Criteria for identifying optimal CFAE sites for ablation, and selection of patients most likely to benefit, require additional study.     

Mechanisms of recurrent atrial fibrillation: comparisons between segmental ostial versus circumferential pulmonary vein isolation

Background: Electrical isolation of pulmonary veins (PVs) is an effective therapy for atrial fibrillation (AF). Both segmental ostial PV ablation and circumferential ablation with PV–left atrial (LA) block have been implicated to eliminate AF. However, the mechanism of the recurrent AF after undergoing either strategy remains unclear.
Methods and Results: Of the 73 consecutive patients with symptomatic AF that underwent PV isolation and had recurrences of AF, Group 1 consisted of 46 patients (age 56 ± 13 years old, 35 males) who underwent PV isolation by segmental ostial PV ablation and Group 2 consisted of 27 patients (age 51 ± 11 years old, 24 males) who underwent circumferential ablation with PV–LA block. In Group 1, the earliest ectopic beat or ostial PV potentials were targeted. In Group 2, circumferential ablation with PV–LA block was performed by encircling the extraostial regions around the left and right PVs. During the first procedure, all patients had PV–AF. There was no difference in the non-PV ectopy between Group 1 and Group 2. During the second procedure, the incidence of an LA posterior wall ectopy initiating AF was significantly lower (20% vs. 0%, P = 0.01) in Group 2. There was no difference in the PV ectopy initiating AF during the second procedure.
Conclusion: Circumferential ablation of AF with PV–LA block may eliminate the LA posterior wall ectopy and decrease the incidence of LA posterior wall ectopy initiating AF during the second procedure.     

Pulmonary edema after extensive radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation

Background: More extensive ablation strategies for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) have increased success rates but are associated with new and sometimes serious complications. We describe a new complication after extensive radiofrequency (RF) ablation in the left atrium (LA) for persistent AF.
Methods and Results: Electroanatomic guided circumferential ablation around both ipsilateral pulmonary veins (PV) was performed with the endpoint of complete conduction block. When necessary, supplementary RF applications were added, including ablation of complex fractionated potentials and/or isolation of other thoracic veins and/or linear left atrial lesions. RF energy was delivered via an irrigated tip catheter with a maximum power of 30–35 W. Four out of 120 patients undergoing extensive RF ablation for persistent AF (including two patients with additional LA substrate modification) developed dyspnea, bilateral pulmonary edema, and signs of a systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) (rise in body temperature, leukocyte count, and C-reactive protein (CRP levels) 18–48 hours after the procedure. There were no signs of PV stenosis, focal lung injury, left ventricular dysfunction, circulatory failure, or infection. All patients had complete recovery with supportive therapy within 3–4 days after the onset of symptoms.
Conclusions: Extensive LA radiofrequency ablation bears the risk of a severe pulmonary edema. Although the precise mechanism is elusive, clinical features point toward a systemic inflammatory response.     

Long-term evaluation of atrial fibrillation ablation guided by noninducibility

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary vein (PV) isolation and linear lesions are effective in eliminating paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF), but linear lesions probably are not required in all patients. Noninducibility of AF has been shown to be associated with freedom from arrhythmia in 87% of patients. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate the role of noninducibility in guiding a stepwise approach tailored to the patient. METHODS: In 74 patients (age 53 +/- 8 years) with paroxysmal AF, PV isolation was performed during induced or spontaneous AF. If AF was inducible after PV isolation, one to two additional linear lesions were placed at the mitral isthmus and/or left atrial roof, with the endpoint of noninducibility of AF or atrial flutter. Inducibility (AF/atrial flutter, lasting > or = 10 minutes) was assessed using burst pacing at an output of 20 mA down to refractoriness from the coronary sinus and both atrial appendages. RESULTS: In 42 patients (57%), PV isolation restored sinus rhythm and rendered AF noninducible. In the 32 patients with persistent or inducible AF after PV isolation, a single linear lesion achieved noninducibility in 20, whereas two linear lesions were required in 12 and resulted in conversion to sinus rhythm and noninducibility in 10. Using this stepwise approach, a total of 69 patients (93%) were rendered noninducible. During follow-up of 18 +/- 4 months, 67 patients (91%) were free from arrhythmia without antiarrhythmic drugs. Repeat procedures were performed in 23 patients: repeat ablation was required to consolidate prior targets in 15 patients (20%), and "new" linear lesions, which were not predicted by inducibility during the index procedure, were required in 8 (11%). CONCLUSION: Noninducibility can be used as an endpoint for determining the subset of patients with paroxysmal AF who require additional linear lesions after PV isolation. This tailored approach is effective in 91% of patients while preventing delivery of unnecessary linear lesions.     

Electrophysiologic and clinical consequences of linear catheter ablation to transect the anterior left atrium in patients with atrial fibrillation

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the feasibility and outcome of ablation to transect the anterior left atrium (LA) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). BACKGROUND: While the Maze procedure is effective in maintaining sinus rhythm in patients with AF, it is associated with significant morbidity. This prospective clinical study evaluates the feasibility and consequences of limited LA linear ablation to transect the anterior LA in patients with AF. METHODS: Twenty-four patients (51.2 +/- 7.3 years) with paroxysmal (n = 16) or chronic (n = 8) AF resistant to pulmonary vein (PV) isolation were studied. To transect the anterior LA, linear ablation was performed joining the superior PVs; this line was then connected to the anterior mitral annulus. Pulmonary vein isolation and cavotricuspid isthmus ablation were performed in all cases. Ablation was performed using an irrigated catheter with the endpoint of achieving complete linear block demonstrated by online double potentials, differential pacing techniques, and an activation detour. RESULTS: Of 20 patients in AF prior to linear ablation, arrhythmia terminated in 12 (60%), including half the patients with chronic AF, during ablation. Despite repeated ablation, complete linear block was achieved in only 14 of 24 patients (58%). Complete linear conduction block resulted in an activation detour around the mitral annulus and PVs with a delay of 158 +/- 30 ms (P = .0001), significantly delayed activation of the lateral LA with prolongation of P-wave duration (P = .002), and characteristic change in P-wave morphology during sinus rhythm (P = .002). Of the 14 with anterior LA transection, 4 (29%) have had regular atrial tachycardias due to macroreentry through recovered gaps. Nine of these 14 (64%) have remained arrhythmia-free without antiarrhythmics compared to 3 of 10 (30%) with incomplete block at 28 +/- 4 months following their last procedure (P = .2). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the feasibility of catheter ablation to transect the anterior LA in humans. While being effective in the termination of AF, this configuration of linear lesions is technically challenging to complete, results in significant delayed LA activation, and is associated with modest long-term arrhythmia suppression.     

Treatment of atrial fibrillation by silencing electrical activity in the posterior inter-pulmonary-vein atrium.

AIMS: The recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) after pulmonary vein (PV) isolation is still a challenge. We investigated a new approach to treating AF patients by silencing electrical activity in the posterior inter-pulmonary-vein atrium (PIA). METHODS AND RESULTS: Three ablation steps are required to obtain PIA electrical silence: electrical PV isolation, the creation of two lines of lesions between the two superior and inferior PVs and the abolition of residual electrical signals within the PIA. The endpoint was the electrical silence and the inability to pace in the PIA. The posterior inter-pulmonary-vein atrium silence was obtained in 42 AF patients (56 +/- 9 years, four women). Recurrence of AF and atrial flutter was observed in 14 (33.3%) patients after the first procedure. Freedom from atrial arrhythmias after the second procedure was displayed by 94.4, 85.7, and 60.0% of patients with paroxysmal, persistent, and permanent AF, respectively. The left atrium (LA) volume was larger, and the percentages of the silent area of the LA surface and voltages were lower in patients with AF recurrence than in recurrence-free patients. CONCLUSION: Posterior inter-pulmonary-vein atrium electrical silence can greatly decrease the AF recurrence. The clinical AF recurrence may be related to an enlarged LA, a low percentage of electrically silent area, and low voltage in the LA.